Thursday, March 4, 2021
Is the Vaccine More Deadly Than the Virus?
The paper interviews Aix-Marseille University Faculty of Medicine Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit's Dr. Hervé Seligmann and engineer Haim Yativ about their research and data analysis. They claim that Pfizer's shot causes "mortality hundreds of times greater in young people compared to mortality from coronavirus without the vaccine, and dozens of times more in the elderly, when the documented mortality from coronavirus is in the vicinity of the vaccine dose, thus adding greater mortality from heart attack, stroke, etc."
Dr Hervé Seligmann works at the Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France. He is of Israeli-Luxembourg nationality. He has a B. Sc. In Biology from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and has written over 100 scientific publications.
FranceSoir writes that they follow publications, data analyzes, and feedback from various countries on vaccination, and have therefore taken an interest in the Nakim article, asking to interview them in order to understand their analysis and its limitations.The authors of the article declare they have no conflicts or interests other than having children in Israel.
After a presentation, the authors discussed their data analysis, the validations carried out, limitations, and above all, their conclusions that they compare with data received via a Health Ministry Freedom of Information Act request.
Their findings are:
- There is a mismatch between the data published by the authorities and the reality on the ground.
- They have three sources of information, besides the emails and adverse event reports they receive through the Internet. These three sources are Israeli news site Ynet, the Israeli Health Ministry database, and the U.S. federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database.
- In January 2021, there were 3,000 records of vaccine adverse events, including 2,900 for mRNA vaccines.
- Compared to other years, mortality is 40 times higher.
- On February 11, a Ynet article presented data related to vaccination. The authors of the Nakim article claim to have debunked this analysis based on data published by Ynet itself: “We took the data by looking at mortality during the vaccination period, which spans 5 weeks. By analyzing these data, we arrived at startling figures that attribute significant mortality to the vaccine."
- The authors say “vaccinations have caused more deaths than the coronavirus would have caused during the same period."
- Haim Yativ and Dr. Seligmann declare that for them, "this is a new Holocaust," in face of Israeli authority pressure to vaccinate citizens.
They also invite specialists to complete their analyses, and intend to pursue legal follow-up to their discovery. The Health Ministry was not available for comment on a FranceSoir query regarding the findings.
The authors also deplored "the fact of not being able to communicate on this vital information" to their fellow citizens.
On their site, Nakim writes: "On February 11, 2021, Ynet (the most known Israeli News website) published a confused and confusing article entitled 'Vaccination efficiency data in Israel, and its rapid effects on the young'.
"Our reanalyses of these data explain why during the massive vaccination project initiated mid-December 2020 during a confinement, daily new confirmed COVID-19 cases failed to decrease as they do during confinements, and, more importantly, why numbers of serious, critical, and death cases increased during that period that covered at least one month. From mid-December to mid-February (two months), 2,337 among all Israeli 5,351 official COVID-deaths occurred. Our analyses indicate orders of magnitude increases in deaths rates during the 5-week long vaccination process, as compared to the unvaccinated and those after completing the vaccination process. Presumably, asymptomatic cases before vaccination, and those infected shortly after the 1st dose, tend to develop graver symptoms than those unvaccinated.
"The Ynet article is organized in an exciting way and uses data provided in an erroneous way by the Ministry of Health. It is unclear whether this was intentional to prove the vaccine's efficiency or if this was done erroneously because the provided data were misunderstood. Note that in Israel, all vaccines are from Pfizer.
"The data in the table, rather than indicating the vaccine efficacy, indicate the vaccine's adverse effects," the authors conclude.
Sources:
http://www.nakim.org/israel-forums/viewtopic.php?t=270812
Related:
British Government Study Confirms Covid-19 Vaccine Risk: Infections INCREASE in Fortnight after Jab90% of ALL coronavirus fatalities have occurred in countries where HALF of people are fat
Big Pharma’s COVID Vaccine
Wednesday, March 3, 2021
Monday, March 1, 2021
Is This the Beginning of the End of the Covid Disaster or Is It Only the End of the Beginning
It is also the case that the wave of reinfections in Brazil, could be evidence of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), meaning that antibodies produced in response to vaccination may facilitate infection by, and enhance the virulence of, novel strains of the virus.
If a pessimistic interpretation of the report from Brazil is correct, the Covid disaster is only now beginning to take shape. What we could then expect is:
Not an end to quarantine for international travelers, but an end to international travel.
Not an end to pub and restaurant closures, but an end to pubs and restaurants.
Not an end to work from home, but an end to most work.
Not an end to home schooling, but an end to schools.
The Covid-19 mRNA vaccines induce an antibody response but no T-cell response. Hence, while they prevent manifestation of disease they do not prevent infection or, therefore, the spread of infection.
Thus, it was to be hoped that because it entailed a T-cell response, resistance induced by infection, unlike that induced by vaccination, would be long-lived. The report from Brazil of widespread reinfection among those previously infected means that this hope was ill-founded.
Friday, February 26, 2021
A Covid Miscellany
President Biden Says the Experimental Coronavirus Vaccines Are Safe. The Vaccines’ Fact Sheets Say Something Very Different
Saturday, February 20, 2021
America: A Nation Living With Lies
Yusef, commenting on an earlier post, pointed out that if reported US Covid-19 deaths relative to population were similar to the numbers reported for the rest of the world:
"we would have 4% of the covid-related deaths. Instead we have 20%, or 5X what we "should" have"
But I see no reason to believe the US stats.
The US has clearly superseded the Soviet Union as the world's biggest liar.
The US doesn't merely lie about important things such as the reasons for "bombing the shit out of" this or that country (to use President Trump's idiom), but about almost everything.
Like the dying Soviet Union, the US teaches lies in its schools and universities.
Indeed, lies are the only essential part of the US educational curriculum, hence America's continuing decline in the ratio of educational attainment per dollar expended, which must be about the lowest in the world.
Americans, like the citizens of Russia in the days of the Soviet Union are living with lies.
Lies about almost everything. From Black lives matter, meaning all white people are racists who deny that black lives matter, to a seemingly endless list of mind-numbing bullshit from micro-aggressions to triggering, pussy hats, cultural appropriation, and the demand for less whiteness, aka European cultural and racial genocide.
Which means that Americans get more lies and sheer nonsense for their educational dollar than anyone else. As the inevitable result, Americans have the lowest rate of academic achievement per dollar invested than any other country in the world, although the Brits are right up there along with the people of Canada where, to quote a national newspaper headline, Universities have become cesspools of political correctness.
What to do?
Well obviously when you are in the throws of a Communist takeover your chances of doing anything to counter the menace other than hurt yourself are slight. But here's how to make a start in transforming "education" from a process of Communist indoctrination to a process of productive learning.
Enact legislation that:
Embodies in education the old English principle that "Sticks and stone may break my bones but words can never hurt me;"
Makes academic achievement the driving principle of education at all levels;
Pays teachers according to student achievement, and pays the best teachers more than the top educational bureaucrats.
But nothing of the kind, obviously, will be done.
We are all doomed. Doomed to live under the increasingly tyrannical rule of fools and scoundrels.
Related:
Philip Giraldi: The Decline of the West: American Education Surrenders to ‘Equity’
Reuters: White House working with Facebook and Twitter to tackle anti-vaxxersFriday, February 19, 2021
Why Almost Everything You Know About Covid-19 Is a Lie
There is no scientific basis for the measures in place to deal with the alleged Covid Pandemic. Among experts, support for these measures is largely limited to those with financial links with pharmaceutical corporations. Public health bureaucrats, such as Fauci at NIH, are also linked with pharmaceutical corporations. Medical practitioners take their guidance from approved authority, which means NIH, CDC, WHO, all compromised with conflicts of interest. Conforming with these compromised institutions provides liability protection that relying on independent expert advice does not.
One thousand five hundred experts from around the world have come together to challenge the Covid measures as “a global scientific fraud of unprecedented proportions.” Here is their statement.
Is it safe to assume that compromised public health bureaucracies with links to pharmaceutical corporations know more and are more trustworthy than independent experts?
What is the real agenda behind the Covid Deception? Clearly it is not public health.
How was media orchestrated to deplatform and censor experts who challenge the obviously unsuccessful Covid measures? It should make you instantly suspicious when scientifically ignorant and totally compromised presstitutes dismiss dissenting independent experts as “conspiracy theorists.”
Why is no public discussion of the situation possible? If the Covid measures could stand examination, there would be no censorship.
Clearly, an undeclared agenda is being shoved down our throats.
In this article Dr. Pascal Sacre explains why the PCR test results in a huge exaggeration in the number of Covid infections and thus serves the assertion of a pandemic and the creation of fear that causes people to accept tyrannical measures.
That independent scientific experts have been forced out of public discussion should tell you how utterly corrupt are the governments of the world.
Related:
The Covid Pandemic Is The Result of Public Health Authorities Blocking Effective Treatment
Coronapocalypse; Big Pharma's Doomsday Vaccine #666Wednesday, February 17, 2021
mRNA Vaccines: Five Questions
2. DID YOU KNOW IT USUALLY TAKES 5-10 YEARS TO FULLY DEVELOP A VACCINE?
4. DID YOU KNOW THAT THE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES CAN’T BE SUED IF THE VACCINE HURTS OR KILLS SOMEONE?
5. DID YOU KNOW 99.8% OF PEOPLE SURVIVE COVID19?
Tuesday, February 16, 2021
Global Warming? Athens, February 2021
Saturday, February 13, 2021
Quote of the Day, No. 79
Biden: “Address me as Mr. President or President Biden”
De Santis: “I will not, and you can go fuck yourself”
Thursday, February 11, 2021
The Moral Insanity of the Politically Correct
The New York Times column the New York Times didn’t want anyone to read
Last weekend, New York Times columnist Bret Stephens wrote a piece criticizing the rationale behind the forced ouster of Times reporter Donald G. McNeil Jr., but it was never published. Stephens told colleagues the column was killed by publisher A.G. Sulzberger. Since then, the piece has circulated among Times staffers and others — and it was from one of them, not Stephens himself, that The Post obtained it. We publish his spiked column here in full.
Every serious moral philosophy, every decent legal system and every ethical organization cares deeply about intention.
It is the difference between murder and manslaughter. It is an aggravating or extenuating factor in judicial settings. It is a cardinal consideration in pardons (or at least it was until Donald Trump got in on the act). It’s an elementary aspect of parenting, friendship, courtship and marriage.
A hallmark of injustice is indifference to intention. Most of what is cruel, intolerant, stupid and misjudged in life stems from that indifference. Read accounts about life in repressive societies — I’d recommend Vaclav Havel’s “Power of the Powerless” and Nien Cheng’s “Life and Death in Shanghai” — and what strikes you first is how deeply the regimes care about outward conformity, and how little for personal intention.
Wednesday, February 10, 2021
The Crooks, Imbeciles and Shysters Behind the Scamdemic
By Jeffrey A. Tucker
American Institute for Economic Research, February9, 2020: People of the future will look back at these 11 months and be very confused. How could virtually the entire world have thrown out settled practices of civil, economic, and cultural liberties for a virus that resisted every attempt to control it?
This virus is not Ebola and it has come nowhere near approaching the death rates associated with H1N1 of 1918. By some measures, it’s not been as deadly as 1957-58, a virus that came and went without much public attention at all. New pathogens are part of life, and there was and is nothing particularly unusual about this one.
The enduring question now and for many years to come will be: why? We all asked the question a thousand times, and it has been asked of us the same number of times. It is too early to say, and the answer will likely be similar to other epic events in history such as the Great War or the Fall of Rome.
Related:
The risk of eternal lockdownSunday, February 7, 2021
Time to Ban the Republican Party?
Biden not legitimately elected, two-thirds of Republicans say
Saturday, February 6, 2021
India Achieves Covid Herd Immunity With Mortality of One in Five Thousand
India, is reported to have achieved Covid herd immunity, with about half the population, or just under seven hundred million people, having Covid19-specific antibodies. That means India is essentially finished with Covid as a national disaster.
Covid deaths recorded in India total 155,000, indicating a Covid19 infection fatality rate of around one in 5000. That is around one tenth of the rates reported in Europe and North America. That difference reflects, at least in part, the steep age-dependence of Covid mortality and a difference in population age profile. India has fewer than 6% of its population aged over 60 versus around 26% in Europe and North America.
In addition, the European and North American infection fatality rates are undoubtedly greatly exaggerated due to underestimation of the infection rate, which is based on reported cases, not population-wide antibody surveys.
The inference is clear: The Western states have totally mishandled the epidemic. The virus should have been allowed to spread among the young and resilient, while the elderly should have been given every means to isolate themselves — if they so chose. And it should be emphasized that isolation of the elderly should have been entirely voluntary. At the age of 75 plus, why should one not take a 10% risk of dying a year or two prematurely due to Covid, rather than being locked up for much, or perhaps all, of the rest of one's life?
What the response of the Western nations to Covid19 demonstrates is either remarkably poor judgement in government, or a conspiracy to undermine Western economies and crush the spirit of the people.
Related:
Zero Covid is a mirageFriday, February 5, 2021
The TCF Convention Center, Detroit, MI, November 4, 2020: Video Cam Record of Post Election Vote Delivery
Source
Tuesday, February 2, 2021
Covid19: Vaccination and the Risk of Antibody Dependent Enhancement
The infection fatality rate for Covid19 has a strong age dependency. Young people have a negligible risk of death from Covid19. Those over 70 have a better than 10% risk of death from the disease. Such a steep age dependency means that rational assessment of the balance between the cost and benefit of vaccination is strongly age dependent.
UK COVID Conundrum: The Mysterious Case Of Disappearing Flu
Monday, February 1, 2021
Understanding your risk from Covid19
Out there in the quagmire of the Internet Covid controversy, Ron Unz remains insistent on the deadly peril of covid, asserting that:
... research—examining deaths out of the total number of infections, which includes unreported cases—suggests that Covid-19 kills from around 0.3% to 1.5% of people infected.
Thus stated, without qualification, covid mortality rates will be taken to refer to the population as a whole, which is an entirely false inference.
Covid mortality is hugely age-dependent, so infection fatality rates are meaningless as a basis for assessing personal risk.
If you are under 21, your risk is of death from Covid19 is substantially less than the risk of being killed in a motor vehicle accident. If you are over 75, your risk of death from Covid19 is 10% or more.
There's another factor that massively distorts understanding of the Covid mortality risk, and that is the prevalence of infection among different groups.
A study conducted in UK care homes revealed that as early as April 2020, 40% of investigated care home residents and 21% of staff were Covid19 antibody positive. These rates, which are vastly higher than national rates at the time (almost certainly less than 5%), mean that UK care homes were death traps for the most vulnerable, and accounted for a large majority of the UK's total Covid death toll.
Take these facts into consideration and it is evident that talking of population-wide IFRs is either foolish nonsense or deliberate misdirection.
In Canada, for example, as of October, 2020, 73% of all Covid 19 deaths were of care home residents.
Covid is not a world-destroying pandemic, but rather, whether launched deliberately or by chance, a mechanism for saving both the UK's bloated National Health Service from collapse under its own monstrous weight, and the profits of the US Healthcare insurers. This it is doing by ridding the world of the most useless and expensive eaters.
Young people mostly understand all of this, which is why they don't give a bleep about lockdowns and resent the cowardice of school teachers and university faculty who won't show up and teach.
Related:
Saturday, January 30, 2021
February 1, 2021
The Largest Experiment on Humans Ever Seen
Avoid the ‘Great Reset’ in Three Easy Steps
Joe Biden Pledged Allegiance To The New World Order In 1992
Text of Donald Trump's Letter to Joe Biden Revealed
Twitter rolls out Stasi-like “snitch” feature
Now Reddit Investors Are Talking About Targeting Silver
How minnows sank the Wall Street sharksMarine LePen Vows to Ban Hijab, "Murderous Islamist Ideologies", As She Scores Record High in Polls
The following statement by Dr. Roberto Petrella is, naturally, dismissed as bunk by the usual defenders of the official pandemic truth:
Tuesday, January 26, 2021
Further Evidence That Lockdowns Don't Reduce Covid Deaths -- But they do increase death and suffering due to hunger, opioid-related overdoses, missed vaccinations, increase in non-COVID diseases from missed health services, domestic abuse, mental health and suicidality, as well as a host of economic consequences with health implications
Mises Institute, January 21, 2021: Although advocates for covid-19 lockdowns continue to insist that they save lives, actual experience keeps suggesting otherwise.
On a national level, just eyeballing the data makes this clear. Countries that have implemented harsh lockdowns shouldn’t expect to have comparatively lower numbers of covid-19 deaths per million.
In Italy and the United Kingdom, for example, where lockdowns have been repeatedly imposed, death totals per million remain among the worst in the world. Meanwhile, in the United States, states with with the most harsh lockdown rules—such as New York, New Jersey, and Massachusetts are among the states with the worst total deaths.
Lockdown advocates, of course, are likely to argue that if researchers control for a variety of other variables, then we’re sure to see that lockdowns have saved millions of lives. Yet research keeps showing us this simply isn’t the case.
The latest study to show the weakness of the prolockdown position appeared this month in the European Journal of Clinical Investigation, authored by Eran Bendavid, Christopher Oh, Jay Bhattacharya, and John P.A. Ioannidis.
Read More
Related:
Congressman who had second COVID-19 vaccine dose tests positive for virusThursday, January 21, 2021
The Deep State's Stealthy, Subversive, Silent Coup To Ensure Nothing Changes
By John W. Whitehead
The Rutherford Institute, January 19, 2020: “You have such a fervent, passionate, evangelical faith in this country…why in the name of God don’t you have any faith in the system of government you’re so hell-bent to protect? You want to defend the United States of America, then defend it with the tools it supplies you with—its Constitution. You ask for a mandate, General, from a ballot box. You don’t steal it after midnight, when the country has its back turned.”—Seven Days in May (1964)No doubt about it: the coup d’etat was successful.
That January 6 attempt by so-called insurrectionists to overturn the election results was not the real coup, however. Those who answered President Trump’s call to march on the Capitol were merely the fall guys, manipulated into creating the perfect crisis for the Deep State—a.k.a. the Police State a.k.a. the Military Industrial Complex a.k.a. the Techno-Corporate State a.k.a. the Surveillance State—to swoop in and take control.
It took no time at all for the switch to be thrown and the nation’s capital to be placed under a military lockdown, online speech forums restricted, and individuals with subversive or controversial viewpoints ferreted out, investigated, shamed and/or shunned.
This new order didn’t emerge into being this week, or this month, or even this year, however.
Indeed, the real coup happened when our government “of the people, by the people, for the people” was overthrown by a profit-driven, militaristic, techno-corporate state that is in cahoots with a government “of the rich, by the elite, for the corporations.”
Related: