I enter the above heading in the contest for the world's most obscure blog post title, a title that I will now attempt to explain.
The Georgia Guide Stones, as any conspiracy theorist knows, were 19-foot-tall slabs of granite erected in a farm field in the US State of Georgia, inscribed with globalist directives including the injunction to eliminate nine tenths of the world's population, while selectively breeding the posterity of the remainder. These stones have now been taken down, the first with an explosive laid by an unknown hand, the rest with a backhoe presumably on orders from Georgia State authorities.
In what way could Covid be related to the Georgia Guide Stones? Simply on the presumption that the virus is the intended mechanism for global depopulation.
But how can that be, since the Covid mortality rate is so low? The answer could be what is known in the technical literature as original antigenic sin (OAS).
Original antigenic sin is the whimsical name for a particular feature of the action of the human immune system. What is it? The answer is fairly straight forward, but, as set forth below, the explanation has a number moving parts.
On first infection by a pathogenic organism, the immune system develops proteins, known as antibodies, that bind to one or more constituents of the alien organism thereby inactivating it. The constituents of the pathogen in response to which antibodies are formed are known as antigens. Thus, for example, infection by the SARSCoV-2 virus, aka Covid-19, elicits the production of antibodies to various protein constituents of that particular virus. Best known among Covid-19 antigens is the infamous spike protein, which enables the virus to enter human cells, while damaging the affected tissues in the process.
The antibodies that the immune system evolves in response to the presence of an antigen, bind to the antigen, thereby preventing it from serving its function, whether that be, in the case of a viral antigen, the invasion of the cells of the host organism or in the replication of the virus once cell entry has been achieved.
Having created an antibody, a process that may take several weeks during which viral infection can proceed, the immune system retains cells, known as memory B-cells, that are capable of producing the same antibody on short notice in the event of a future infection. That is the essence of disease immunity, and is the phenomenon upon which the effectiveness of vaccination against infection depends. In vaccination, a pathogen-derived antigen, or a non-infectious form of the pathogenic organism, is injected to induce the production of pathogen-specific antibodies resulting in long-lived disease immunity.
Original antigenic sin results when infection by a particular pathogen is succeeded by infection by a evolved version of the same pathogen in which the antibody-inducing antigen, for example the spike protein in the case of Covid-19, differs due to mutation from the immunity inducing antigen of the earlier infection or vaccination. What happens then is that the mutated antigen evokes rapid production of antibodies effective against the original antigen. This reaction is a sin if the mutation in the antigen of the newly infecting pathogen prevents effective binding by the antibodies to the original antigen, which are what the host organism is producing. In that case, the immune system kicks into high gear producing antibodies that don't work.
Here then is how OAS could be exploited to cut a huge swathe through the human population.
First, let loose a virus such as Covid-19 that is both highly infectious and sufficiently scary to compel universal vaccination.
Next, release a novel strain of the virus with mutations that massively increase virulence while modifying the antigen against which the vaccine-induced antibodies are effective (the spike protein in the case of Covid-19 mRNA vaccines) in such a way that it resists binding by the vaccine induced antibodies.
The result? The immune system goes into overdrive producing ineffective antibodies, and people die by the billion.
The above conspiracy theory is just that, a theory, without any supporting evidence that I am aware of. But it does demonstrate that we live in interesting, and dangerous, times.
Related:
Comments of Harvard University Prof, Martin Kulldorff via the Daily Skeptic
On the scientific community’s denial of natural immunity…
We’ve known about natural immunity since 430 BC during the Athenian plague. So this is not a new concept. It would have been shocking if the immunity from the vaccine was better than the immunity from having recovered from Covid. So by pushing these vaccines on those who already had Covid, was both unnecessary and unethical, but it also diminishes the trust in public health authorities and diminishes the trust in vaccines. […] These vaccine fanatics (e.g., Canada's low-IQ PM, Justin Trudeau) who insisted that everybody should be vaccinated, including those who already have immunity from having recovered from Covid, I think they have destroyed the confidence in vaccines in general, to an extent that a small group of pre-Covid, so-called anti-vaxxers had never succeeded.
On the reaction to the Great Barrington Declaration…
The difference was that it came from three people other than one person. All of the three of us have worked on infectious disease technology. […] All of us came from reasonably respectable universities: Oxford, Harvard and Stanford. So it was impossible to ignore. We were attacked, including by the NIH Director Collins and Anthony Fauci and Jeremy Farrar at the Wellcome Trust here and Christian Drosten in Germany who called us pseudo-scientists. But I think the key thing was to show the public that there was not scientific consensus for lockdowns.
On whether he was supported by Harvard after speaking out…
No, I didn’t get much defence from the university, no. […] I got private emails from many of the faculty members, many of whom I’d never heard of before. So there was support, yes, from individuals. […] I think that’s a huge problem for science as we move forward, because science can only thrive with discussions. It’s a process. And if we don’t have open discourse about science, science is going to die.
On the problems with epidemiological modelling…
I think these models where you predict a certain number of people are going to die, are pretty useless. And the key thing is what is the optimal strategy to use? So in the case of Covid, in the beginning, we didn’t know exactly what was the infection-fatality rate, which is what’s the risk of dying if you get infected, because we didn’t know how many people had got infected. The optimal strategy doesn’t depend on if it’s 0.1%, or 1% because the optimal strategy depends on the difference, the relative risk in the difference by age or some other factor. So in terms of deciding what is the optimal thing to do, these models that Imperial College developed, I think were very useless.
On the effects of mishandling the pandemic…
I think there will be an enormous distrust in public health agencies. I think there will be an enormous distrust in science, in the scientific community. I think that will take decades to repair, if it can be repaired, I don’t know. I’m sure there will be consequences, political consequences as well. They’re obviously enormous public health consequences from the collateral damage, which I mentioned. I think there’s also economic consequences of these lockdowns that we’re starting to see now. So I think the consequences are profound. And maybe we are in a tipping balance in terms of whether we accept this as the standard way of doing things, which I think would be terrible, or maybe we go in a different direction, where we say, this was a fiasco, let’s make sure it doesn’t happen again.
Plus:
Possible mechanism behind mysterious COVID-19 symptoms“experts say the trend probably stems from statistical “biases” — the nature of the people who have been getting tested and who most frequently were exposed to the virus — and definitely not some strange quirk of immunization.”
"Ol’ blackface Trudeau is taking a page straight out of Biden’s playbook.
The tyrannical Canadian PM is currently holed up in his basement as tens of thousands of trucks and countless others begin arriving in the country’s Capitol of Ottawa to protest his autocratic Covid-19 mandates. ..."
We’re experiencing an attack on the foundation of ordered liberty, an assault that is already in the process of submerging democracies beneath what the Italian philosopher Giorgio Agamben has called a “permanent ‘state of exception.’”
 |
| Red line = Natural immunity from infection Yellow line = Immunity from infection plus vaccination Green line = Immunity from vaccination Vertical axis: Infection risk reduction Image Source |
A headline reads:
New COVID Virus Variant Identified in Africa Is “Highly Transmissible and Vaccine-Resistant.”When Jens Spahn, Germany's Minister of Health, said that, within months, all Germans will be "vaccinated, cured, or dead," his objective, presumably, was to so terrify the unvaxxed that they would get the jab.
However, the statement of this latter-day Goebbels embodies a lie, three lies in fact.
First:
Conveyed by implication, the Minister's first lie is that the "vaccinated" are a distinct category from the "cured" and the "dead". This however is not so. British data show that the vaccinated are more, not less, likely than the unvaccinated to catch Covid. That means that the vaccinated must, in greater numbers than the unvaccinated, be joining the community of the "cured" or the "dead".
In fact, among adults over the age of 29, the British data show that the Covid case rate, i.e., cases percent, for the vaccinated is more than twice that for the unvaccinated.
Second:
As for the division between the "cured" and the "dead," it is true, again according to British data (see Page 15), that mortality from Covid is higher among the unvaccinated that the vaccinated, but contrary to the implication of the minister's statement, the risk of death from Covid is not great, rather, it is barely higher than that from the flu.
Among under 18's, the recorded death rate per 100,000 was zero for both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated.
In the 18- to 60-year-old category, the death rate for the four-week period to Week 42 was 2.8 in 100,000 (0.0028%) among the unvaccinated, versus 0.48 in 100,000 (0.00048%) among the vaccinated.
For the over 60's the recorded overall mortality was 63 per 100,000 (0.063%) among the vaccinated versus 176 per 100,000 (0.176%) among the unvaccinated.
For comparison, in 2019, deaths in the UK involving flu and pneumonia averaged 8.5 per 100,000 (0.0085%) per four-week period, which is four times the death rate from Covid among unvaccinated people between the ages of 18 and 60 recorded during the four weeks to October 24, 2021.
Third:
The third lie implied by the German "Health" Minister's statement is that the progress of Covid through the population is a bad thing that must be halted. In reality, Covid is beyond containment. All attempts, however draconian, to stop the spread of this highly infectious virus have failed. That is true even in China, where outbreaks are ongoing. Covid has become endemic, meaning that it is now widespread and ineradicable by means of any feasible public health measures.
Now, therefore, the objective of public policy should be to allow the acquisition of herd immunity through naturally acquired infection among the majority of the population, although those wishing to obtain whatever benefit there may be from vaccination should certainly be free to do so. The resultant more widespread immunity from infection, already acquired by a large fraction of the world's population, will prove to be both more robust and more durable than the short-lived, narrow-spectrum immunity provided by the so-called vaccines.
With the attainment of herd immunity, the virus will reach a stage of so-called endemic equilibrium, meaning that it will remain in circulation, but at a sub-epidemic rate, its spread limited by naturally acquired immunity throughout the population.
Immunity from the so-called vaccines will not be a factor in ending the Covid pandemic since we have seen from the UK data that the vaccines do not stop, but rather promote, viral spread.
The vaccines now available are of value, at best, in moderating the severity of disease. Moreover, there is a cost to the use of the vaccines, that being an increase in the number and virulence of newly created Covid variants.
Far from inducing a general immune system response, the vaccines induce merely the production of antibodies to just one of the virus's 18 protein components, namely the spike protein of the original Wuhan Covid strain. Thus, any mutation in the Covid spike protein that evades neutralization by vaccine-induced antibodies makes the vaccinated person a potential incubator for a novel Covid variant.
This phenomenon of vaccine-facilitated immune escape means that the ongoing and world-wide drive to achieve universal vaccination with the present generation of "leaky" Covid vaccines may be about to create a global catastrophe. Specifically, the vaccines may be giving rise to an array of Covid variants more deadly than the original virus. Thus, to quote an article from The Lancet:
If substantial immune evasion occurs, current vaccines are likely to still offer some benefit to individuals. At the population level, however, they could induce viral selection and escape, making the prospect of achieving herd immunity increasingly remote.That is a truly terrifying prospect: a world ravaged by multiple Covid variants, against which the achievement of population-wide natural immunity has been made virtually unattainable.
“The forced vaccination of all military personnel with the present COVID-19 vaccines may compromise U.S. national security due to the unknown extent of serious vaccine complications,”writes Furman. “Further study is needed before committing the Total Force to one irreversible experimental group. Initial reports leave more concern for the COVID-19 vaccinations than the virus itself for the (at present) exceptionally healthy military population.”
The average member of the U.S. military is young and in excellent physical fitness, two categories that are nearly immune to the dangers of COVID. So far, only 24 people out of 2.2 million military personnel have died of COVID-19, a rate of less than one per 91,000.
There is reason to believe severe or even fatal side-effects from existing COVID-19 vaccines are more common than reported, and could even prove deadlier to otherwise-healthy servicemen than COVID-19.
There is also the outlier possibility that mRNA vaccines (the kind used by the Moderna and Pfizer shots) may have unanticipated negative effects on the immune systems of recipients.
Currently, the U.S. military has proven completely capable of weathering COVID-19 without any loss of effectiveness, so forcibly making the entire service a test case for a novel type of vaccine is a pointless risk.
The same points apply to the majority of the civilian population.
But who cares?
Certainly not geniuses like Biden, Bojo or Justin Trudeau, who are clearly intent on gaining favor with the very rich corporations that are massively profiting from everyone being injected with an experimental, and all to often lethal, vaccine of slight to zero efficacy.
Assessing the Value of COVID-19 vaccination in Those Recovered From Covid
MedRXiv: Among the 52238 Cleveland Clinic Health System workers in Ohio on Dec 16, 2020, 1359 (53%) out of 2579 previously infected subjects remained unvaccinated. Not one of these Covid recovered but unvaccinated individuals experienced a SARS-CoV-2 infection during the course of the study, whereas there was a steady increase in infections among previously uninfected subjects who remained unvaccinated.
But despite studies such as the above which prove what any reasonably well informed person would expect, the silly buggers who constitute the public health authorities in Canada and many other countries want to compel injection of an untested so-called vaccine into Covid recovered individuals who are known to have robust and durable Covid immunity.
Those who have had Covid cannot benefit from vaccination, although they may suffer harm, up to and including death.
Why then are governments in Canada and elsewhere seeking to compel those who have had Covid to be "vaccinated"?
And if you have no explanation, why would you vote for the representatives of those governments ever again?
Hell, the Canadian vaccination regime with mixed vaccine types is not even recognized as a valid vaccination by national border control in many countries.
And for those who have had Covid and want recognition of the immunity to re-infection thereby gained, why not lobby your Provincial Health Officer, MLA, MP, Premier, whoever, to provide access to a Covid T-cell test such as this, and to grant Covid recovereds status equivalent to (actually in terms of immunity, superior to) those who have had the so-called vaccine.
Related:
Britain's SAGE Doomsters:Piers Moron of the Daily Moil calls for Gestapo treatment of the unvaccinated
Study: Recovered COVID-19 Patients Possess Robust Immunity To Virus"Why would people who have recovered from Covid and have active antibodies, and are therefore immune -- they have natural immunity, why would they be forced to take an experimental vaccine?"
Prof. Montagnier referred to the vaccine program for the coronavirus as an “unacceptable mistake”. Mass vaccinations are a “scientific error as well as a medical error,” he said. “It is an unacceptable mistake. The history books will show that, because it is the vaccination that is creating the variants,” Prof. Luc Montagnier continued.
The prominent virologist explained that “there are antibodies, created by the vaccine,” forcing the virus to “find another solution” or die. This is where the variants are created. It is the variants that “are a production and result from the vaccination.”
CDC admits that everything it pushed to “cure” COVID-19 has failed, including “vaccines”
In Britain, five times more children committed suicide than died of Covid19.
But they kept them home from school.
They made them wear masks.
And now they're determined to inject them with an experimental vaccine that hasn't prevented thousands dying from Covid.
Other than for killing substantial numbers of people, the "vaccine" appears to be useless.
Meantime, most Brits are self-isolating in fear and trepidation, not.
Related:
Arutz Sheva: Covid infection gives greatly superior Covid immunity than "vaccines"
Because, of course, a 22 year-old graduate in Whiteness Studies sitting in Twitter’s HQ in Silicon Valley knows much more about infectious diseases than a Harvard professor of medicine.But if you don't care about your mind being shaped and twisted for profit by Silicon Valley and in the service of the Money Power, carry on Twittering.
“He is Risen – Death could not hold him. Rejoice in the resurrection of Jesus Christ.”
How soon before the US follows the path of the defunct Soviet Union by making the expression or religious faith illegal.
Related:
Facebook ‘Fact-Checks’ Woman’s Post on Vaccine’s Adverse Reaction One Week Before It Killed HerAnd Other Lying Bastards
"It Was Intentionally False": 60 Minutes Slammed For Fabricating "Pay-For-Play" Narrative Against Gov. DeSantis●”If I get vaccinated can I stop wearing a mask?”
Government: “NO”
●”If I get vaccinated will the restaurants, bars, schools, fitness clubs, hair salons, etc. reopen and will people be able to get back to work like normal?”
Government: “NO”
●”If I get vaccinated will I be resistant to Covid?”
Government: “Maybe. We don’t know exactly, but probably not.”
●”If I get vaccinated, at least I won’t be contagious to others – right?”
Government: “NO. the vaccine doesn’t stop transmission.”
●”If I get vaccinated, how long will the vaccine last?”
Government: “No one knows. All Covid “vaccines” are still in the experimental stage.”
● “If I get vaccinated, can I stop social distancing?”
Government: “NO”
● “If my parents, grandparents and myself all get vaccinated can we hug each other again?”
Government: “NO”
● “So what’s the benefit of getting vaccinated?”
Government: “Hoping that the virus won’t kill you.”
●”Are you sure the vaccine won’t injure or kill me?”
Government: “NO”
●”If statistically the virus won’t kill me (99.7% survival rate), why should I get vaccinated?”
Government: “To protect others.”
●”So if I get vaccinated, I can protect 100% of people I come in contact with?”
Government: “NO”
● “If I experience a severe adverse reaction, long-term effects (still unknown) or die from the vaccine will I (or my family) be compensated from the vaccine manufacture or the Government?”
Government: “NO – the government and vaccine manufacturer’s have 100% zero liability regarding this experimental drug”
Related:Letter to Editor of Focus Malaysia
A LEADING global environmental virologist and microbiologist for 30 years and involved in human vaccine development for 23 years with various major pharmaceutical firms, Dr Geert Vanden Bossche warns that the global vaccination programme amid the global pandemic does more harm than good.
Expressing genuine concerns if the vaccination was the right thing to do against this super smart mutating coronavirus, he stated: “If you go to war, make sure you have the right weapon at the right time against the enemy that you understand enough.”
He further warns that the vaccination:
In a nutshell, if we aren’t cautious, humanity – facing a “global catastrophe without equal” – will suffer exponentially by this “emperor” virus.
In June 2020, Ken Frazier, CEO of Merck, implored the need to understand the coronavirus more before rushing for a quick solution via vaccines. (Merck is the gold standard for vaccine development and had produced four out of seven successful vaccines in world history)
Merck was honest enough to give up its COVID-19 vaccine development programme to this mutating “emperor” virus to focus on a treatment or cure.
The Director of US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in stating in a CNN report on March 2 that gains made in the US including the mRNA vaccination could be wiped out by new variants. This supports Dr Bossche’s warning.
The US Government National Institutes of Health (NIH) has confirmed that the mRNA vaccine is a form of gene therapy, an approach that can have “serious health risks, such as toxicity, inflammation and cancer.”
Already, there are many reported cases worldwide about unexplained deaths and suffering from severe side effects after taking the Pfizer product.
Being constructive and based on Dr Bossche’s revelatory warning, we appeal to the Government and its relevant agencies to:
Therefore, we urge the Government to immediately approve Ivermectin, a repurposed” wonder drug” that’s easily available, very safe and effective in preventing and treating COVID-19 and also fund a low-cost Ivermectin Programme.
We are aware that Ivermectin poses a major financial threat to some big pharmaceutical firms and unfortunately. Ivermectin is being discredited and demonized by people with selfish interest, whose biased views must be seriously dismissed.
In fact, Ivermectin has already been proven to be safe for over 40 years. The Government has nothing to lose by immediately approving Ivermectin in Malaysia, as a prescribed drug. There is no need to wait for clinical trials as people are dying fast and getting infected from COVID-19.
We state clearly here that we do not have vested interest, directly or indirectly, in the manufacturing, selling or distribution of Ivermectin. – March 12, 2021
Signatories:
