Letter to Editor of Focus Malaysia
A LEADING global environmental virologist and microbiologist for 30 years and involved in human vaccine development for 23 years with various major pharmaceutical firms, Dr Geert Vanden Bossche warns that the global vaccination programme amid the global pandemic does more harm than good.
Expressing genuine concerns if the vaccination was the right thing to do against this super smart mutating coronavirus, he stated: “If you go to war, make sure you have the right weapon at the right time against the enemy that you understand enough.”
He further warns that the vaccination:
- Creates more asymptomatic cases to spread the virus as the vaccines do not prevent infection and transmission;
- Merely suppresses COVID-19 symptoms and can prevent hospitalisation and deaths. But at what price?
- only stimulates artificially induced antigen-specific antibodies and not natural killer (NK) cells needed to neutralize the coronavirus effectively;
- Allows antigen-specific antibodies, which may not work on new variants, to remain permanently and compete with, undermine and even destroy capable and loyal warrior NK cells;
- Helps create new variants and “teaches” the virus on “viral immune escape”; and
- It is a “lose-lose” situation that is dangerous at all levels, emphasizing that dealing with the coronavirus and pandemic must be based on science.
In a nutshell, if we aren’t cautious, humanity – facing a “global catastrophe without equal” – will suffer exponentially by this “emperor” virus.
In June 2020, Ken Frazier, CEO of Merck, implored the need to understand the coronavirus more before rushing for a quick solution via vaccines. (Merck is the gold standard for vaccine development and had produced four out of seven successful vaccines in world history)
Merck was honest enough to give up its COVID-19 vaccine development programme to this mutating “emperor” virus to focus on a treatment or cure.
The Director of US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in stating in a CNN report on March 2 that gains made in the US including the mRNA vaccination could be wiped out by new variants. This supports Dr Bossche’s warning.
The US Government National Institutes of Health (NIH) has confirmed that the mRNA vaccine is a form of gene therapy, an approach that can have “serious health risks, such as toxicity, inflammation and cancer.”
Already, there are many reported cases worldwide about unexplained deaths and suffering from severe side effects after taking the Pfizer product.
Being constructive and based on Dr Bossche’s revelatory warning, we appeal to the Government and its relevant agencies to:
- Urgently consider deferring, if necessary, the mRNA vaccination programme to truly curb long-term harm;
- Do an honest “benefits versus risks” analysis for every vaccine purchased based on the latest information (It is UNFAIR to lump these vaccines together as not all vaccines are equal. We are NOT anti-vaxxers but pro-SAFE vaccines);
- Keep its promise NOT to force – directly or indirectly – vaccination, especially with the experimental mRNA vaccine, which is a breach of the Nuremberg Code; and
- Consider (after a study) using more appropriate, much safer, and tried and tested vaccines such as using inactivated or attenuated virus technology while choosing the right timing to enforce the vaccination programme.
Therefore, we urge the Government to immediately approve Ivermectin, a repurposed” wonder drug” that’s easily available, very safe and effective in preventing and treating COVID-19 and also fund a low-cost Ivermectin Programme.
We are aware that Ivermectin poses a major financial threat to some big pharmaceutical firms and unfortunately. Ivermectin is being discredited and demonized by people with selfish interest, whose biased views must be seriously dismissed.
In fact, Ivermectin has already been proven to be safe for over 40 years. The Government has nothing to lose by immediately approving Ivermectin in Malaysia, as a prescribed drug. There is no need to wait for clinical trials as people are dying fast and getting infected from COVID-19.
We state clearly here that we do not have vested interest, directly or indirectly, in the manufacturing, selling or distribution of Ivermectin. – March 12, 2021
Signatories:Covid Research Centre, Kuala Lumpur
Persatuan Patriot Kebangsaan (PATRIOT)
Gabungan NGO Islam (GNI)
"It is a “lose-lose” situation that is dangerous at all levels, emphasizing that dealing with the coronavirus and pandemic must be based on science."
ReplyDeleteThis is all so chilling. Humanity may very well be blindly and unnecessarily entering into the worst catastrophe in its history. It is much, much worse that if it does so, the catastrophe has elements of being self-induced.
I had a long and productive conversation yesterday with my son. He was interested in satellites, orbits, and so on. This led us into a discussion of airplanes, airplane crashes, and much more.
As we discussed these things I started to realize what a terrible disservice to the nation's youth when the official 9/11 narrative had been allowed to stand basically without modification. It did not meet scientific scrutiny and any young person who was not sufficiently versed in science at the time (and how could they be?) or sufficiently skeptical of the government's science-based institutes and agencies (I don't think it is healthy for youth to be so skeptical, nor should it be necessary) had their minds bent to accept as reasonable and science-based that which was neither.
I myself relied consistently on NIST throughout my career. Imagine NIST publications or certifications or anything else which are not impeccable. There's no reason for them not to be. They can and must be held to the highest scientific and ethical standards. They are after all, the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Yet the NIST publication about the collapse of the WTC buildings was released with a full official NIST seal of approval.
I see this now as a prelude to what's happened with the CDC. These previous "lapses" of the "official" scientific community served as trials, or test balloons of how much the public would swallow without rebellion, as well as how effectively the "unofficial" and dissenting scientific community would be in countering the disinformation offensive.
Yusef, thank you for your comments.
DeleteI share your feeling of shock and disgust at government-mandated lies on scientific and technical questions.
The rot was evidently taking hold by the mid eighties -- the time of the Shuttle Challenger disaster, the cause of which, but for Richard Feynman, would likely forever have been concealed from the public.
Such dishonesty in government, is of course, to be expected, but here in the Western world we once prided ourselves on being different from the Soviets or the ChiComms, and indeed we believed, and I believe, believed correctly, that the commitment to truth was a key factor in our success in the realms of science and technology.
Well now we lie with the worst of them while our preeminence in most fields of science and technology has been lost or is in rapid decline. Those trends are surely not unconnected. Moreover, they are reflected in the academy, where woke bullshit is peddled with the highest administrative approbation.
As has long been known, those whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad, or if not mad, then habitual liars.
This SOB Dr. Anthony Fauci,
ReplyDelete"In a press conference Thursday, infectious disease expert Dr. Anthony Fauci expressed his joy that he could now "let the science speak" after being sidelined by former President Trump. Fauci also said he recently suffered mild side effects after his second covid shot.
Anthony Fauci on Thursday said it has been “liberating” to work as the nation's top infectious diseases doctor under President Biden after his experience working for former President Trump. Speaking at the White House press briefing, Fauci was asked if he feels "less constrained" in the new administration after clashing with Trump and eventually being sidelined last year.
Fauci, who has served under seven presidents as head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, was a frequent target of public criticism from President Donald Trump, who accused him and other career scientists at public health agencies of overstating the seriousness of the worsening pandemic and hampering efforts to address it.
Most of the times Dr. Anthony S. Fauci made an appearance in the White House briefing room in 2020 — before eventually being banished from public view for his grim assessments of the coronavirus pandemic — he had President Donald J. Trump glowering over his shoulder. On Thursday, Dr. Fauci, the nation’s foremost infectious disease specialist, was back, this time with no one telling him what to say. And he made no effort to hide how he felt about it. (Shear, 1/21)
“No,” Fauci replied. “I mean, I always said everything on the basis [of science] — that’s where I got in trouble sometimes.”
Anthony Fauci, the U.S. government’s top infectious-disease expert, said he suffered mild side effects after receiving a second dose of the Covid-19 vaccine. “I was hoping that I wouldn’t get too knocked out. I did for about 24 hours. Now I’m fine,” he said at a White House event Thursday. Fauci, an adviser to President Joe Biden on Covid-19, said he felt fatigued and achy, “not sick.”
Coronavirus Guidelines Now The Rule At White House.Testing wristbands are in. Mask-wearing is mandatory. Desks are socially distanced. The clearest sign that there’s a new boss at the White House is the deference being paid to coronavirus public health guidelines. ... Officials in close contact with Biden wear wristbands to signify they have been tested that day. Every event with the president is carefully choreographed to maintain distancing, with strips of paper taped to the carpet to show the likes of Vice President Kamala Harris and Dr. Anthony Fauci where to stand when Biden is delivering an address. ... Plexiglass barriers have been set up at some desks that are in open areas, but nearly all staff who are already working in the building have enclosed offices."
Fauci was silenced and sidelined? Fauci was constrained? Fauci got into trouble because everything he said was scientific? Trump glowered over Fauci’s shoulder?
Fauci is a perfect example of a member of the Trump administration who undermined President Trump every way he could. Obviously he felt no loyalty to Trump. Obviously what he is relieved by now is he has complete, unquestioned, unobstructed authority in the Biden administration.
If it is true Fauci took two coronavirus shots and suffered severe fatigue for twenty-four hours, he really has no idea what that actually meant. Doesn't sound "mild" to me, anyway. (I once got a rabies vaccination and experienced this.) He is simply making an unfounded assumption this "mild" side effect is induced through physiological is similar or analogous to what's scientifically understood to happen with tried and tested, safe vaccines. Because the symptoms of the side effects seem the same. He better get down on his knees and pray he is right.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI forgot to put in the link for the information about Fauci:
ReplyDeletehttps://khn.org/morning-breakout/for-dr-fauci-relief-and-liberation-now-that-bidens-at-the-helm/
I edited (deleted parts) the text somewhat, for brevity.