Thursday, June 10, 2021

How to Depopulate the World: Self-disseminating Sterilizing Vaccines

"Self-disseminating vaccines have their roots in the Australian effort to create sterilizing vaccines for small mammal control."

Source: Nature Ecology and Evolution — 27 July 2020: Self-disseminating vaccines to suppress zoonoses (Scott L. NuismerJames J. Bull)

   There you have it: Bill Gates'es answer to the problem of useless plebs in a world of automation and AI:

   Dr. Fauci will finance the research, then a "lab leak," universally denied by the trusty media, and the self-disseminating "vaccine" will do the rest.

   First, though, the elite require an anti-sterilizing virus vaccine for themselves.

   As the authors of this paper write:
"Their (i.e., self-disseminating vaccines) obvious advantage, of course, is that for each animal you vaccinate directly, additional animals are vaccinated for ‘free’ either through behavioural transmission of a conventional vaccine or through the contagious spread of a transmissible vaccine. ...."
"There are two possible applications for self-disseminating vaccines, ... one that can be realized now and another that is more aspirational.
The immediate application focuses on well-characterized pathogens such as rabies and Lassa virus that regularly spillover into the human population from known animal reservoirs.
The aspirational application envisions the possibility of preventing future pandemics by eliminating high-risk zoonotic pathogens from their animal reservoirs before spillover into the human population occurs."

   But that there are only "two possible applications" for the technology of self-disseminating vaccines is clearly false, as the authors' boxed statement above confirms. 

   The technology of self-disseminating "vaccines" provides top-down control of future human evolution. 

   Yes, the technology of self-disseminating "vaccines" provides elites, people like Bill Gates and his friends such as the supposedly late Jeffrey Epstein, the means to eliminate large swaths of the global population, while introducing whatever characteristics they deem desirable in that remnant of the global population they see fit to preserve. 

   What will stop them. Nothing that I can think of, other than world revolution followed by a Taliban-style suppression of advanced technology. 

   In the meantime, here's what would bring me to approve the Presidency of Joe Biden: a one-time 15%  "emergency" capital tax on billionaires, to be followed by an annual capital tax of 2%. That would at least put the bastards on notice. 


US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting system:

‘Self-spreading’ vaccines pose multiple risks to society — including the end of informed consent

Lawmakers Send Letter To Fauci Demanding He Explain Remarks That Allegedly Contradict Testimony To Congress

America's Moral Decline: Fauci Lied to Congress, and a US Judge Condoned Torture

Despite Fauci’s claims, the National Institute for Allergic and Infectious Diseases, which Fauci heads, provided money that went to China's Wuhan Institute of Virology for gain of function research. Specifically, research that weaponized corona viruses originating from bats.

And at Gitmo: For the first time in American history, a federal judge last week authorized the government to admit as evidence in a criminal case in a public courtroom words uttered by the defendant that were obtained under torture. The fruits of torture – which is any cruel or degrading or intentionally painful or disorienting behavior visited upon a person in captivity to induce compliance or to gratify the torturer – are not permitted in any court in the United States, and their inducement is criminal. Read more.

Wednesday, June 9, 2021

Suuuuure, Covid19 Did Not Come From the Lab

Hear Fauci-funded Peter Daszak, who subcontracted research to China's Wuhan Institute of Virology, on how we create deadly new diseases in the lab:


And supporting the out-of-the-lab thesis on the origin of Covid19, if only unintentionally, this absurdly bad article and mostly fatuous comments from the Unz Review, which claims that the virus was created and released by a bunch of dirty NeoCon Jews plus the horrible Steve Bannon intent on war with China.

Yes, there may be dirty NeoCon Jews intent on war with China, but that is not the relevant question. What's relevant is:

(1) Are there people creating dangerous pathogenic viruses in the lab?

And if so,

(2) Are they creating dangerous pathogenic corona viruses with spike protein genetically engineered to increase infectivity and virulence, i.e., viruses that would look just like Covid19.

To which the answer, in both cases, is yes.

Related questions of interests include:

(3) Was such gain-of-function research on pathogenic viruses being conducted in China?

And if so,

(4) Was such work conducted in collaboration with scientists from the US, the UK and other Western countries with US Funding provided, directly or indirectly, by Fauci's National Institute of Allergic and Infectious Diseases?

To which the answer in both cases is yes.

None of this means that Covid19 came from the lab, but it establishes:

First, that Covid19 could be, and in light of other evidence, almost certain is, a lab construct;

Second, that Covid19 could have been released from the lab into the human population in many possible accidental or deliberate ways, including collusion between US and Chinese agents intent on promoting the New World Ordure.


ZH: CDC To Hold "Emergency Meeting" After 100s Suffer Heart Inflammation Following COVID Vaccines
CanSpeccy: Blaming America for China's Covid lab leak?

Monday, June 7, 2021

Wall St. Journal: The Science Suggests a Wuhan Lab Leak

By Steven Quay and Richard Muller

Wall St. Journal, June 6, 2021: The possibility that the pandemic began with an escape from the Wuhan Institute of Virology is attracting fresh attention. President Biden has asked the national intelligence community to redouble efforts to investigate.

Much of the public discussion has focused on circumstantial evidence: mysterious illnesses in late 2019; the lab’s work intentionally supercharging viruses to increase lethality (known as “gain of function” research). The Chinese Communist Party has been reluctant to release relevant information. Reports based on U.S. intelligence have suggested the lab collaborated on projects with the Chinese military.

But the most compelling reason to favor the lab leak hypothesis is firmly based in science. In particular, consider the genetic fingerprint of CoV-2, the novel coronavirus responsible for the disease Covid-19. 

In gain-of-function research, a microbiologist can increase the lethality of a coronavirus enormously by splicing a special sequence into its genome at a prime location. Doing this leaves no trace of manipulation. But it alters the virus spike protein, rendering it easier for the virus to inject genetic material into the victim cell. Since 1992 there have been at least 11 separate experiments adding a special sequence to the same location. The end result has always been supercharged viruses.

A genome is a blueprint for the factory of a cell to make proteins. The language is made up of three-letter “words,” 64 in total, that represent the 20 different amino acids. For example, there are six different words for the amino acid arginine, the one that is often used in supercharging viruses. Every cell has a different preference for which word it likes to use most.

In the case of the gain-of-function supercharge, other sequences could have been spliced into this same site. Instead of a CGG-CGG (known as “double CGG”) that tells the protein factory to make two arginine amino acids in a row, you’ll obtain equal lethality by splicing any one of 35 of the other two-word combinations for double arginine. If the insertion takes place naturally, say through recombination, then one of those 35 other sequences is far more likely to appear; CGG is rarely used in the class of coronaviruses that can recombine with CoV-2.

In fact, in the entire class of coronaviruses that includes CoV-2, the CGG-CGG combination has never been found naturally. That means the common method of viruses picking up new skills, called recombination, cannot operate here. A virus simply cannot pick up a sequence from another virus if that sequence isn’t present in any other virus.

Although the double CGG is suppressed naturally, the opposite is true in laboratory work. The insertion sequence of choice is the double CGG. That’s because it is readily available and convenient, and scientists have a great deal of experience inserting it. An additional advantage of the double CGG sequence compared with the other 35 possible choices: It creates a useful beacon that permits the scientists to track the insertion in the laboratory.

Now the damning fact. It was this exact sequence that appears in CoV-2. Proponents of zoonotic origin must explain why the novel coronavirus, when it mutated or recombined, happened to pick its least favorite combination, the double CGG. Why did it replicate the choice the lab’s gain-of-function researchers would have made?

Yes, it could have happened randomly, through mutations. But do you believe that? At the minimum, this fact—that the coronavirus, with all its random possibilities, took the rare and unnatural combination used by human researchers—implies that the leading theory for the origin of the coronavirus must be laboratory escape.

When the lab’s Shi Zhengli and colleagues published a paper in February 2020 with the virus’s partial genome, they omitted any mention of the special sequence that supercharges the virus or the rare double CGG section. Yet the fingerprint is easily identified in the data that accompanied the paper. Was it omitted in the hope that nobody would notice this evidence of the gain-of-function origin?

But in a matter of weeks virologists Bruno Coutard and colleagues published their discovery of the sequence in CoV-2 and its novel supercharged site. Double CGG is there; you only have to look. They comment in their paper that the protein that held it “may provide a gain-of-function” capability to the virus, “for efficient spreading” to humans.

There is additional scientific evidence that points to CoV-2’s gain-of-function origin. The most compelling is the dramatic differences in the genetic diversity of CoV-2, compared with the coronaviruses responsible for SARS and MERS.

Both of those were confirmed to have a natural origin; the viruses evolved rapidly as they spread through the human population, until the most contagious forms dominated. Covid-19 didn’t work that way. It appeared in humans already adapted into an extremely contagious version. No serious viral “improvement” took place until a minor variation occurred many months later in England.

Such early optimization is unprecedented, and it suggests a long period of adaptation that predated its public spread. Science knows of only one way that could be achieved: simulated natural evolution, growing the virus on human cells until the optimum is achieved. That is precisely what is done in gain-of-function research. Mice that are genetically modified to have the same coronavirus receptor as humans, called “humanized mice,” are repeatedly exposed to the virus to encourage adaptation.

The presence of the double CGG sequence is strong evidence of gene splicing, and the absence of diversity in the public outbreak suggests gain-of-function acceleration. The scientific evidence points to the conclusion that the virus was developed in a laboratory.

Dr. Quay is founder of Atossa Therapeutics and author of “Stay Safe: A Physician’s Guide to Survive Coronavirus.” Mr. Muller is an emeritus professor of physics at the University of California Berkeley and a former senior scientist at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Sunday, June 6, 2021

America's Repellent Elite: The Truth About Bill Gates, Microsoft, and Jeffrey Epstein

 By Whitney Webb

In early May, the announcement that Bill and Melinda Gates would be divorcing after twenty-seven years of marriage shocked both those that praise and those that loathe the “philanthropic” power couple.

Less than a week after the initial announcement of the divorce, on May 7, the Daily Beast reported that Melinda Gates had allegedly been “deeply troubled” by Bill Gates’s relationship with child sex trafficker and intelligence asset Jeffrey Epstein. The report suggested that Melinda was a major reason for her husband’s decision to distance himself from Epstein around 2014 because of her discomfort with Epstein after they both met him in 2013. That previously unreported meeting had taken place at Epstein’s mansion on New York’s Upper East Side.

The Daily Beast also revealed that the details of the Gates’s divorce had been decided several weeks prior to the official announcement. Then, on May 9, the Wall Street Journal published a report suggesting that the plans for divorce went back even farther, with Melinda having consulted divorce lawyers in 2019. Allegedly, that consultation was made after details of Bill Gates’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein had gained considerable mainstream media attention, including from the New York Times.

While mainstream media outlets apparently agree that Jeffrey Epstein was a likely factor in the Gates’s recently announced split up, what these same outlets refuse to cover is the real extent of the Bill Gates–Jeffrey Epstein relationship. Indeed, the mainstream narrative holds that Gates’s ties to Epstein began in 2011, despite the evidence pointing to their relationship beginning decades earlier.

This blanket refusal to honestly report on the Gates-Epstein ties likely is due to Gates’s outsized role in current events, both in terms of global health policy as it relates to COVID-19 and in his being a major promoter and funder of controversial technocratic “solutions” to a slew of societal problems. What is more likely, however, is that the nature of the relationship between Gates and Epstein before 2011 is even more scandalous than what transpired later, and it may have major implications not just for Gates but for Microsoft as a company and for some of its former top executives.

This particular cover-up is part of an obvious tendency of mainstream media to ignore the clear influence that both Epstein and members of the Maxwell family wielded—and, arguably, continue to wield—in Silicon Valley. Indeed, the individuals who founded tech giants such as Google, LinkedIn, Facebook, Microsoft, Tesla, and Amazon all have connections with Jeffrey Epstein, some closer than others.

Read More

Friday, June 4, 2021

The Origin of Covid: An Interesting Observation

Here's a comment from a discussion over at


Phylogenetic analyses have shown that the Wuhan ‘L’ strain is NOT ancestral to the Italian ‘G’ strain which has the D614G mutation in its spike S protein, causing the latter to become more infectious over time. The Wuhan ‘L’ strain does NOT have the D614G mutation in its spike S protein which explains its low rate of infectiousness thus leading to a lower number of Covid-19 cases in Wuhan, as compared to Italy.

The attribution of Wuhan-1 arising inside of China is quite likely true, however the attribution of progenitor Covid is not needed to originate inside of China, that is only an inference that has not been established.

The Wuhan ‘L’ strain is attributed to have originated in Wuhan while the Italian ‘G’ strain is attributed to have originated in Italy. Both share a common ancestral strain which has yet to be attributed to its place of origin.

Here’s an article discussing the significance of the D614G mutation in the Italian ‘G’ strain which caused the global Covid-19 pandemic:

G strains are now dominant around the world. One specific mutation, D614G, has become the most common variant. It is so named because one amino acid is changed from a D (aspartate) to a G (glycine) at the 614th position on the viral spike proteins, the structure that gives the virus its crown-like appearance.

The rise of the G strains coincided with spikes in outbreaks of the virus around the world, with a clutch of new cases allowing the strains to invade new areas. The dominance of the G strains is illustrated by the data for Australia, Japan and Thailand. During Australia’s second wave of infections, G strains were present in almost all samples, indicating the country had effectively eliminated transmission of the earlier L and S strains through a series of social distancing measures. All of Australia’s second wave clusters were sparked by people who had returned from overseas and breaches in quarantine.

The dominance of the G-strains becomes even more evident when looking at some countries with the most infections.

The United States is leading the overall number of infections and deaths by far. The majority of infections and first, second, and third waves all coincide with the increase in samples showing three G strains.

In India, a similar pattern can be observed as the constant increase in infections from June to September seemed to follow the curve of the G strain samples.

Empirical evidence suggests that travel bans and containment measures adopted against travelers from China during Jan-Feb 2020 helped stop the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus as evidenced by the low number of Covid-19 cases involving the Wuhan ‘L’ strain outside of China. Scientific evidence has now proven that the Italian ‘G’ strain spread rapidly throughout the Western World during the same period precisely due to its D614G mutation which caused the global Covid-19 pandemic.

As both the Wuhan ‘L’ strain and the Italian ‘G’ strain were known to have been discovered in December 2019, the question as to the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus must perforce address the global spread of the ancestral strain prior to December 2019. This inquiry should not be limited to Wuhan but also expanded to Italy and elsewhere.

That the SARS-COV2 viral outbreak in China in late 2019 was of the less infectious L Strain, not the G Strain that afflicted the rest of the world, would explain several otherwise curious facts; namely, 

(1) that China contained the initial outbreak quickly and with very few deaths; and 

(2) that China is currently resorting to lockdowns to limit new outbreaks of SARS-COV2 that are, presumably of the more infectious and virulent G Strain that originated outside of China.

As the author of the comment quoted above notes, that the global pandemic began with more than one viral strain raises new questions about the origin and global spread of SARS-COV2.

Time for Fauci and Gates to Sweat

 By Yusef:

Fauci has been nothing more, his entire career, than a tool to the elites who run the country from behind the scenes.

It may be-- maybe-- now the octogenarian tool will be used as the scapegoat for the whole ugly destructive mess.

"We were listening to Dr. Fauci, the nation's 'chief immunologist'-- what else could we do? We had no idea, no idea at all, he was this corrupt. We didn't know he was the bad apple at NIH, spoiling the bunch of great scientific work they otherwise do there."

Dr. Fauci has been touted as if all-knowing, the scientist who knows more than any other scientist, and even knows, just by looking at it, what's credible and what is not.

I mean, come on, look at this. Facebook and Google were censoring anyone who mentioned the lab leak theory. Even though the lab leak theory was the one best supported by what we knew.

A virus with bat and pangolin and then a special furin-activating site which just happened to activate infectivity into humans. Suspected to have originated in a place in China known to have a lab conducting precisely such "gain of function" research, and where lab workers had been hospitalized with "covid-like" symptoms prior to the general outbreak.

But the nation's chief immunologist said that was ridiculous, so it was ridiculous. Until now, when it may turn out to be convenient for the powers that be the nation's chief immunologist be revealed as a conniving buffoon.

If I was Fauci, I would be sweating. But it does look as if he's been sweating all along...

If I was Bill Gates, I would be sweating. Fauci and Gates are connected somehow and this is understood among those paying attention. But Gates probably isn't sweating. Nor has he been sweating all along. He is far too stupid and removed from the realities of daily plebian life to see how vulnerable he actually is right now.


AIER: Why Is There Such Reluctance to Discuss Natural Immunity?

Globe and Mail:
Canada's connection with China's bioweapons research

Read the Fauci emails

Fauci’s Boss ADMITS That NIH Was Funding Wuhan Lab And The CCP, Not Them, Had Control Over What They Were Doing

DM: British doctor and his secret campaign to gag the Covid lab leak theory: He worked in Wuhan and manipulated coronaviruses — yet orchestrated a campaign to clear it of blame and tried to hide his tracks

Jonathan Cook: Was There a Wuhan Lab Leak? An Inquiry Won't Dig Out the Truth. It Will Deepen the Deception

Armstrong Economics: Gates & Schwab Control Europe

Big Pharma now taking out Big Tech: Oracle VP dies of “covid” after receiving second vaccine injection

Zhengli-Li Shi (Bat Woman) and Ralph S. Baric and others: A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence

Chinese military 'engineered mice with humanized lungs' in 2019 to test viruses on them - just months before the pandemic erupted

Tuesday, June 1, 2021

Blaming America for China's Covid lab leak?

Did the virus responsible for the Covid-19 pandemic come from China's Virology Research Institute in Wuhan? 

And if so, did it get loose by accident or design. 

Today the English speaking media seem to have abandoned the idea that the virus came by chance from a bat to humans, possibly by way of an intermediate vector such as a pangolin. 

Close-up of a pangolin hunting for ants.
Instead, the story now is that the virus most likely escaped from China's Wuhan institute of virology, when workers there became infected and took the virus home with them, thereby setting the virus on course to infect, first, the people of Wuhan, and then the World.

The Unz Review (Prop. Ron Unz)  however, is fiercely combating that meme, arguing in a series of articles by Ron himself that the pandemic is a 100% American-made fiasco and that to suggest any Chinese responsibility is a gross libel on that unfortunate nation, emanating from a US Government described by one commenter as "a collection of liars, murderers and thieves acting in bad faith," which I suppose is a fair description -- a fair description, in fact, of just about any government, including, quite possibly, China's. 

In his latest piece, Mr. Unz offers fifty two hundred words to distract from the fact that Wuhan virologists, with indirect US funding via Dr. Fauci's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, were evaluating chimeric corona viruses for human infectivity, as tested on human tissue cultures and humanized mice. Details are reported here:

The pandemic has thus, almost certainly, been the result of US:Chinese collaboration. And that collaboration either led to an unintended lab leak, or to an exercise to evaluate pandemic control measures in anticipation of someone accidentally or deliberately letting loose a corona virus with a lethality of 50% plus, not Covid's 0.05%. 


...A trove of emails from Dr. Anthony Fauci — who was the government’s top infectious disease specialist during the AIDS pandemic, the anthrax attacks, and the COVID pandemic — was published on Monday by BuzzFeed after they were produced pursuant to a FOIA request. Among other things, they reveal that in February and March of last year — at the time that Fauci and others were dismissing any real possibility that the coronavirus inadvertently escaped from a lab, to the point that the Silicon Valley monopolies Facebook and Google banned any discussion of that theory -- Fauci and his associates and colleagues were privately discussing the possibility that the virus had escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, possibly as part of a U.S.-funded joint program with the scientists at that lab. ...

'It looks a lot like perjury': Tucker Carlson accuses Dr Fauci of lying

FAUCI LIED, MILLIONS DIED — Fauci Was Informed of Hydroxychloroquine Success in Early 2020 But Lied to Public Instead Despite the Science #FauciEmails

"Expect the Unexpected" Indeed - Fauci's Pandemic-Profiteering Book Was Just Pulled From Amazon, Barnes & Noble

"That Was A Lie": Tucker Carlson Levels Fauci After FOIA Emails Connect The Dots

Wuhan Panic: Is Fauci Going To Jail?

Saturday, May 29, 2021

SARS COV 2 Pandemic: A Joint US:China Biowarfare Defense Exercise?

 My bet is that the Covid pandemic was a joint US:Chinese exercise to game a pandemic due to a deadly biological weapon of mass destruction. 

The corona virus, one of several viruses responsible for the common cold, was the agent chosen because it is virtually harmless except to elderly people who are liable to be carried off by even a mild  respiratory infection. 

The strain of the virus that was used had been souped up through joint US:Chinese "gain-of-function" research to be highly infectious, as would be required of a real WMD.

The PCR test was adopted as the standard means of identifying cases because the symptoms of Covid infection were too  hard to detect, there being no swollen lymph nodes (buboes), pocks, vomiting of blood, etc., to distinguish the infection from, well, a just a common cold.

To induce the state of fear necessary to induce people to participate in the exercise, the virus was released in the vicinity of a Chinese bioweapons research establishment. 

To make the virus especially scary, it was reported to have jumped from bats to humans -- yikes.

Then the Chinese put on a fine bit of theartre, with folks supposedly stricken by the virus dropping in the streets, going into paroxysms, etc.

Other videos showed people in China being nailed up in their homes or being doused in the streets by trucks spraying disinfectant. 

In most First World nations, infected hospital patients were forced into care homes for the elderly setting off a massive die-off. Thus in Canada, over 70% of all reported Covid deaths were "achieved" in this way.

Now almost everyone was scared and there was no trouble getting everyone to mask up, while seeking always to maintain their distance from every other human on the face of the earth, even the flesh of their own flesh, their partner in marriage. 

To maintain the fear, the PRC test was amped to give massive numbers of false positive "cases," and anyone dying within 28 days of a positive test result was declared a Covid "death" even if the proximal cause of death happened to have been a motor vehicle accident or a bullet in the head. 

Meantime, big pharma was working for a big pay-day by producing a novel type of "vaccine" that does not give you real immunity, just some antibodies to be going on with, before a top-up shot, or booster, is required. 

Most people were scared enough by now to get "vaccinated" as soon as possible, and those who were reluctant were being bullied into getting the "vaccine" by, well being called "hesitant" and "anti-vaxx" or just plain conspiracy nuts. 

Moreover, the "hesitant" were threatened with the introduction of a vaccine passport, for the lack thereof, they would be barred from virtually every social space and function, a fate unavoidable without getting the shot, plus the booster and the top-up and whatever else the authorities decide it is necessary that they be injected with. 

Meantime the case count as determined by the dodgy PCR test showed the virus to be coming in waves and multiple variants. 

Thus it was decided that salvation, for which the people were now desperately anxious, could only be achieved by locking everyone but essential workers at home. 

Lockdowns, at first known only in totalitarian China, were now essential throughout the developed world, although poorer countries, where lockdown was impractical since it would mean general starvation, seemed to suffer no worse from Covid than the developed world.

But even in the developed world, lockdowns were not without catastrophic consequences for millions upon millions of small business, many of which were forced into permanent closure. 

Meantime, at vast public expense, experience was being gained with track and trace, and millions were being made by those with good government connections in the face-mask and hand sanitizer supply business and, particularly, PCR testing.

At some point, in the next 12 months, the exercise will hopefully be wound up and the world will return to something like normal once again, but better prepared,perhaps, for all out war with biological weapons of mass destruction.


LA Times: Trump administration ended pandemic early-warning program to detect coronaviruses

Daily Mail: COVID-19 'has NO credible natural ancestor'

Martin Armstrong: Collapse in Confidence: Vaccine Refusal

Luc Montagnier (The Nobel Prize winner who isolated the AIDS virus)The COVID-19 Shots are Creating “Variants”

The Daily reckoning: COVID and the Noble Lie

Gateway Pundit: 1,000 Lawyers and 10,000 Doctors Join Together and File Lawsuit to Prosecute the “2nd Nuremburg Tribunal” Against Corona Fraud Scandal

Thursday, May 27, 2021

Dr. Mike Yeadon, Anti-Covid-Vaxx Speech at Canterbury Freedom Rally: 15 May, 2021

In this presentation Dr. Yeadon makes no claim that the vaccines are designed to kill people. Furthermore, he says he'd "like to know what's in them," which suggests that he had no real basis for having previously claimed that the vaccines, or the top-up or booster shots, were designed to depopulate the world. 

Wednesday, May 26, 2021

Dr. Michael Yeadon, Former Pfizer Inc. VP and Chief Science Officer, Undermines Own Anti-Vaxx Message With Claim That Vaccines Are Designed to Kill Ya

 Yesterday I summarized key points made by Dr. Michael Yeadon, former Pfizer Inc. VP and Chief Science Officer, concerning Covid vaccines and and the public policy response to the Covid pandemic. Here, I consider the validity of four of those claims.

First: asymptomatic transmission is a lie.

This is the premise of Yeadon's claim that locking down asymptomatic people, as a means to stop viral spread, makes no sense. 

On the face of it, the claim is plausible: Only when the virus has multiplied sufficiently to induce coughing, sneezing, and a running nose is the virus easily spread, whether by physical contact or the spread of airborne droplets of mucus and saliva. 

Thus, says Yeadon, we should quarantine the sick not the healthy, "that is what we have always done."

 But what we have always done does not stop viral spread as the almost yearly return of the flu confirms, despite the fact that people expressing symptoms of the flu stay home. 

And the reason that people with the flu staying home does not stop the spread is for the obvious reason that until they become symptomatic, people infected by the flu virus do not stay home, which means that there is "asymptomatic transmission."

In particular, "asymptomatic transmission" most likely occurs during the few hours between a person becoming aware that they are sick and the time they are able to sequester themselves at home.

Thus, it is not necessarily a mistake to quarantine all but essential workers during an epidemic of what is considered a dangerous disease. 

Moreover, even if it is true, as Yeadon claims,  that "we have never done that," i.e., quarantine the healthy, that fact has no bearing on the question of the best public policy today. Furthermore, there is a clear distinction between the present circumstances, and hence the most appropriate policies,  and times of epidemics past. 

For example, in London, during the plague years of the early 17th Century, infected individuals were required to remain at home. Any seen in public with the marks of the plague upon them were liable to death by hanging. 

But that asymptomatic individuals were free to go about their business in plague-ridden London during the early sixteen hundreds was a matter of absolute necessity for the reason that a large proportion of the population was essential to maintain the production and distribution of food and other essential services.

Today, economic conditions are totally different. In the developed world, a mere one percent of the population is sufficient to maintain full agricultural production, and another several percent suffice to move and process the food, keep the lights on, chlorinate the water, and run the sewage plant. For the rest, they might just as well be locked up if that is what it takes to "bend the curve."

Second: Immunity to infection depends, primarily, not on antibodies, but on T-cells.

Is that claim true? As a non expert, I won't presume to say. However, it seems to be the case that robust and durable immunity to a viral pathogen does depend on T-Cell immunity, whereas, antibody immunity, for example that induced by "vaccination" with Covid spike protein mRNA, even if effective in preventing the manifestation of disease in infected individuals, will likely fade within months.

Third: Covid is less of a threat that the flu, except to the elderly and those with certain predisposing conditions

This I believe is correct and it underlies Yeadon's message, which is this: 

We should have allowed Covid to spread freely, while seeking to quarantine only the elderly and others at particular risk of death from Covid. Had that been the policy adopted, herd immunity would have been achieved before the end of last year, and Covid, otherwise known as SARS COV 2 would be a thing of the past, as is the case with SARS COV 1 with which it has an 80% genetic similarity. 

Fourth: Booster shots now being prepared by Yeadon's old employer Pfizer Inc. and other mRNA vaccine suppliers will be designed not only to handle Covid variants that escape control by the current Covid vaccines, but to induce genetic diseases, cancer, liver failure whatever, as a population reduction measure. 

This has to be nonsense. Genetic vaccines, whether of RNA or DNA cannot have secret ingredients. There must be literally thousands of people around the world capable of reading the nucleotide sequence of a nucleic acid "vaccine" and understanding its intended purpose. The inclusion, for example, of CRISPR technology to modify the genetic code of the treated person would be immediately apparent, likewise the inclusion of cancer-causing genes or other lethal components. What that means is that the monstrous crime against humanity that Yeadon proclaims to be the purpose of the ongoing Covid vaccination program would be impossible to perpetrate without exposure.

But if Yeadon's key point is nonsense, what does that mean? Possible it means simply that Dr. Yeadon is off his head. That does happen to highly intelligent people, and there is no doubt that Yeadon is highly intelligent. 

Alternatively, the explanation seems to be that Yeadon is a mouthpiece for extremely nasty propaganda, which works as follows:

Yeadon's key point, that the vaccines are a depopulation weapon designed to kill you, is obvious nonsense, therefore, everything Yeadon says is nonsense, which thus falsifies the idea that: 

(a) Instead of wrecking economies with lockdowns, Governments should have allowed the virus uncontrolled spread to achieve herd immunity, which would have ended the SARS COV 2 pandemic, months ago.  

(b)  That antibody-inducing M-RNA "vaccines" are essentially useless if not worse than useless. 

So it would appear that whatever his intention, Yeadon's public statements about Covid vaccines have the perverse effect of convincing many people that Covid-related public policies pursued by Western governments, including the planned introduction of vaccine passports which Yeadon has quite correctly, in my view, inveighed against,  have all been for the best in the best of all possible worlds, whereas in fact, the opposite is almost certainly case. 


Summit News: Johns Hopkins Prof: Half Of Americans Have Natural Immunity; Dismissing It Is ‘Biggest failure Of Medical Leadership’

Monday, May 24, 2021

Covid Update May 25, 2021

To summarize what Dr. Yeadon has to say in this lengthy video:

1. Asymptomatic transmission is a lie

2. PCR Tests as they are being conducted are meaningless

3. Lockdown is ineffective as a means to prevent transmission: the correct action is to quarantine the sick not the healthy

4. Covid is less of a threat that the flu, except to the elderly and those with certain predisposing conditions

5. Immunity to infection depends not on antibodies, but on T-cells*

6. Cheap non-proprietary drugs are highly effective in reducing covid infection and treating those already infected.

* Here's the controversial bit: that immunity to Covid infection does not depend on antibodies. Is that true. As a non expert, I don't know. But the whole objective of the mRNA vaccines is to induce antibodies. And in particular, it is claimed that the antibodies produced are "neutralizing", which means that they resist infection.

It is on this point that Yeadon is in total disagreement with vaccine specialist Geert vanden Bossche, who argues that immunity achieved with the mRNA vaccines will be lost as genetic variants of the virus emerge that escape control by the antibodies induced by the vaccines. Yeadon has gone so far as to call vanden Bossche's position evil, i.e, deliberately false.

7. Yeadon claims, correctly I believe, that Covid variants will not escape Covid T-cell immunity.

With respect to this point, however, it is the case that apart from those who have already been infected with Covid or a sufficiently closely related Corona virus, none have Covid T-cell immunity. Moreover, Yeadon does not deal with the question of neutralizing Covid antibodies, i.e., whether the mRNA vaccines can in fact work, or whether even minor genetic differentiation in the circulating virus result in immune escape from vaccine induced antibodies.

Rather, Yeadon turns to the "top-up" vaccines being prepared now to induce antibody immunity to the antibody immune-escape variants. These booster shots, he fears, are designed not to restore Covid immunity but to use genetic technology to kill you.

Unfortunately, there is no real public debate among experts to discuss these issues. Specifically about:

(a) How effective can antibody immunity to Covid be (the number of so-called break-through Covid infections of vaccinated individuals suggests that it is not very effective) and how rapidly is Covid escape from antibody immunity through genetic differentiation occurring; and

(b) What possibility exists that an intentionally lethal mechanism could be included in a supposed antibody inducing mRNA vaccine?

Instead, we have merely propaganda deployed against anyone who questions the pretty certainly badly if not catastrophically flawed public policy response to Covid-19.


The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended that people who have recovered from the Covid-19 virus get vaccinated, arguing that health officials don’t know how long natural immunity lasts.

“Even if you have already recovered from COVID-19, it is possible—although rare—that you could be infected with the virus that causes COVID-19 again,*” the CDC says on its website.

But even if you have already been vaccinated, IT IS POSSIBLE AND ACTUALLY QUITE LIKELY that you could be infected with the virus that causes COVID-19.

But Note: of the two, immunity due to past infection should provide much greater protection than the immunity induced by the so-called "vaccines"since it includes the full spectrum immune response, including long-lasting, probably life-long, T-Cell immunity, as well as the short-lived antibody response induced by the vaccine. 


*Presumably what the CDC is trying to say here is that "you could be re-infected with Covid-19, not that you "could be infected with the virus that causes Covid-19 again." Note: there is no virus that "causes Covid-19 again," there is just a virus that causes Covid-19, which, allegedly, may infect you again and again unless you have the vaccine -- a claim in support of which there is little if any evidence, and given the known limitations to the effectiveness of the so-called vaccine, is almost certainly untrue. 

Wuhan Lab Staff Hospitalized With Covid-Like Symptoms Before Confirmed Outbreak

MSM Finally Reports on Wuhan Illnesses in November 2019 – More Than A Year After First Reported By the Alt media

The role of vaccinations in India’s SURGING death rate can no longer be denied

Friday, May 21, 2021

Covid Update: May 23, 2021

UK government is paying the Sun and Daily Mail for positive coverage of its coronavirus response

Nobel Prize winner, Luc Montagnier, says covid vaccination is an “unacceptable mistake” that’s spreading “variants”

“It is clear that the new variants are created by antibody-mediated selection due to the vaccination. ....

Ever since Chinese Virus injections were introduced, the disease and death rate has only continued to skyrocket, the latest data shows. Especially among young people, the death count has “exploded” in every county where the jabs are now being widely administered.

The fake news media is calling each of these cases “breakthrough,” the sentiment being that they are abnormal. The truth, however, is that vaccine-caused variants are the norm, and more people would realize that if only they would take the time to look at the science for themselves."

CanSpeccy: Covid 19 Vaccination: Leading to a Global Viral-Immune-Escape Catastrophe?

Plos One (April 28, 2021): Risk of rapid evolutionary escape from biomedical interventions targeting SARS-CoV-2 spike protein

CDC Caught Manipulating Data to Hide New COVID Cases Among those Who Were Already Vaxxed

Tucker Carlson: Know potential risks of coronavirus vaccines before getting vaccinated

If people get jabbed after watching this they are beyond saving

...all four vaccines in use in Europe contain a fatal design flaw: they cause the fusogenic, pro coagulation spike protein to be expressed wherever the vaccine is taken up. In some people, especially those so young that they’re at no measurable risk of death if infected by the virus, vaccination results in their deaths from thromboembolic events. Permitting the inexpert population to walk into this trap is unconscionable: there will be thousands of further vaccine-induced deaths of young people.

It is my deduction and conclusion that the only motivation that fits all the observations is the intention to ‘herd’ every citizen into a VaxPass system. This is a completely novel system. Never before have all individuals been represented in a single, interoperable database as a unique digital ID, accompanied by an editable health-related field. Whoever controls that database, and the algorithms which govern what it permits and denies, has literally totalitarian control of the entire population.

Jim Jordan: Where did the Covid-19 virus come from:

Leave Our Kids Alone

... notice the deliberately-misleading moniker the media invented for the people who get Covid after being vaccinated. They call them “Breakthrough cases”.

“Breakthrough”? Really?

If cases surge in nearly every country that launches a mass vaccination campaign, then there’s nothing “breakthrough” about it. It’s the predictable result of a failed experiment.

Wednesday, May 19, 2021

White Self Genocide: If You're White, Your Government Has Painted a Target on Your Back

Paul Craig Roberts, former US Deputy Secretary to the Treasury, explains how the US is ruled and how the Western nations are intent on racial and cultural self-destruction:

Dan Hannon: Covid Has Killed Freedom

Monday, May 17, 2021

Prince Harry, the Direct Descendant of George the Third, In His Open Declaration of Contempt for the First Amendment, Backs the Woke Revolution to Intimidate the People and Recognize the Money Power as the Permanent Government of Amerika

Proving that royalty can be stupid beyond belief and highly toxic, Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, is reported to have offered the following botched attempt at intelligent speech in something called a podcast:

"I don't want to start sort of going down the First Amendment route because that's a huge subject and one in which I don't understand because I've only been here a short period of time," Harry said.

"But, you can find a loophole in anything. And you can capitalize or exploit what’s not said rather than uphold what is said." He said.

"I’ve got so much I want to say about the First Amendment as I sort of understand it, but it is bonkers," he continued.
So now you know.

If you are an anti-masker, Harry does not want to hear from you.

If you have a religious scruple against the taking of human life in the womb, Harry does not want to hear from you.

Harry is a counter-revolutionary who dreams, apparently, of becoming the ruler, nominal or otherwise, of an anti-democratic, Amerikan Empire.

He is, it would appear, a poorly educated and confused puppet of America's plutocracy that has become impatient with the democratic charade and wishes to govern directly and without the uncertainties and embarrassments of rule by bribery and blackmail of what are nominally the elected representatives of the people.


“Free Speech Is A Digital Black Plague”: Bishop Garrison is Key Mercenary in Biden’s Dark War Against The First Amendment

Sunday, May 16, 2021

Untested Covid-19 "Vaccines:" Known Unknowns

International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research:

Not only blood clots? EMA ‘assessing reports’ of AstraZeneca jab link to rare IMMUNE DISORDER

The Faces of Corruption

G7 leaders

Ten things we have learned during the Covid coup:

1. Our political system is hopelessly corrupt. Virtually all politicians are hopelessly corrupt. No political party can be trusted. They all can be, and have been, bought.

2. Democracy is a sham. It has been a sham for a very long time. There will never be any real democracy when money and power amount to the same thing..

3. The system will stop at nothing to hold on to its power and, if possible, increase its levels of control and exploitation. It has no scruples. No lie is too outrageous, no hypocrisy too nauseating, no human sacrifice too great.

Denying Reality Leads To Tyranny And Societal Failure

Thursday, May 13, 2021

Quote of the Day, May 13, 2021

What used to be unimaginable is now taking place in America. We see certain aspects of Nazi-like totalitarianism in the United States. The obsession with race, declaring an ethnic group collectively guilty, shaming, humiliations based on ethnicity, lootings, arson, racist violence, intimidation of opponents, cancel culture, controlled dissemination of news, and indoctrination of children in schools. We see fake news, conspiracy theories, an overhaul of history, a new language imposed, and unprosecuted theft. All in the name of a more just culture.

On May 8, we remembered that America had a leading role in liberating Europe from the totalitarian Nazi regime. But who will liberate America if it becomes totalitarian state? America is playing with fire.