Wednesday, May 14, 2025

Canadian PM, Mark Carney, Disabuses Trump of the Idea That Canada Would Rape Easy

Here's the conversation, which reveals one thing clearly: Trump is a narcissist devoid of the slightest intellectual heft. His arguments for a US takeover of Canada are not even childish, they are inane. The border between the countries, he states, is a straight line, as if that established the need for union. He then follows this vacuity by saying that the map of a US:Canadian Union would make a pretty picture. This pretence of an argument he then seeks to reinforce with the further irrelevance that "I'm a very artistic person." Yeah, and so was Adolph Hitler, who could actually paint, while dreaming of territorial expansion.

History, Carl Marx said, repeats, first as tragedy then as farce. The first time with Adolph it was certainly a tragedy. It's to be hoped that this time, with Trump, it remains only a farce.

Carney responded to the American President's outburst of threatening drivel with subtle firmness. Canada, he made clear, would never ever be American.

Bravo, but Canada should up its defense budget. Who knows, Canadians may have to fight for their national survival sooner than they had ever expected, against a foe they had never imagined.

And DJT wants a piece of Palestinian land too.

The Spectator: How Donald Trump will be impeached


Thursday, May 8, 2025

Trump Hastening the End of US Power

Dimitri Lascaris says Trump’s chaotic second presidency is hastening the demise of U.S. global power.

Dimitri Lascaris is a lawyer, journalist and activist. He worked for many years as a lawyer for some of the biggest corporations on Wall Street. To say he knows a lot about deal-making is an understatement.

Lascaris says Trump’s acclaimed business prowess and “art of the deal” are wildly overrated. He is a failed real estate magnate who has been bankrupted and bailed out numerous times.

His 1987 bestselling book, The Art of the Deal, should have been titled The Art of the Con.

Trump’s proposal to take over Gaza and turn it into a “Riviera of the Middle East” is typical of his unscrupulous and brutish style. It is ethnic cleansing – a blatant war crime on a massive scale – dressed up by Trump as a wonder deal.

The 47th U.S. president’s stupidity, arrogance and criminality are fully on display.

Read more

Meantime:

New, American-born, Pope Leo XIV Supports Open Borders — Previously Took Aim at VP J.D. Vance for Defending American Sovereignty.

Hey Popey: Set an example for the World. Take down your own wall.

Tuesday, May 6, 2025

More Lies About Canada From US President Bullshit

Washington CNN — President Donald Trump has been making false claims about Canada for months. He did it again in the days leading up to his scheduled Tuesday meeting with Prime Minister Mark Carney.

In an interview that aired Sunday on NBC, Trump made Canada’s military spending sound much smaller than it is and made the US trade deficit with Canada sound much bigger than it is. And in a late-April interview with The Atlantic, he exaggerated the extent of Canada’s trade reliance on the US.

Here is a fact check of these claims – and a bunch of others Trump has made about Canada this year.

Canada’s military spending
Trump, who has spoken repeatedly of his desire to somehow turn Canada into the 51st US state, said in the NBC interview: “And by the way, Canada, they spend less money on military than practically any nation in the world. They pay NATO less than any nation.”

Facts First: It’s not true that Canada is the lowest military spender in NATO or “practically” the world’s lowest military spender. Official NATO estimates show that, of the 31 alliance members with a standing army, Canada had the eighth-highest defense spending in absolute terms in 2024; it had the fifth-lowest defense spending as a percentage of gross domestic product – low, but not lower “than any nation.” The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, which tracks global military spending, reported that Canada was the world’s 16th-highest 2024 military spender in absolute terms out of more than 150 countries for which the institute had data.

Trump’s claim is still wrong if he happened to be speaking literally about members’ direct contributions to NATO’s organizational budget. Canada is currently the 6th-largest contributor to NATO’s “common funding” pool.

The US trade deficit with Canada
Trump has repeatedly said the US has a “$200 billion” trade deficit with Canada. He used a familiar vaguer formulation in the NBC interview, claiming, “We subsidize Canada to the tune of $200 billion a year.”

Facts First: Trump’s claim is not even close to true. Official US statistics show the 2024 deficit with Canada in goods and services trade was $35.7 billion. Even if you only count trade in goods and ignore the services trade at which the US excels, the deficit was $70.6 billion. And even if he was this time using the word “subsidize” to describe unspecified other things in addition to the trade deficit, there is no basis for the claim.

The US-Canada trade relationship
Trump, talking about Canada, claimed to The Atlantic that “they do 95% of their business with us.”

Facts First: There’s no doubt Canada is heavily reliant on its trade relationship with the US, but Trump’s “95%” figure is a significant exaggeration. Canada’s federal statistics agency reported in February: “In 2024, the United States was the destination for 75.9% of Canada’s total exports, and was the source of 62.2% of Canada’s total imports.”

Other Trump false claims about Canada
Here are some other false claims about Canada that Trump has made in 2025:

Canada’s defense spending: Trump falsely claimed in January that Canada spends “less than 1%” of GDP on defense. The official NATO estimates show Canada spent an estimated 1.37% of GDP on defense in 2024, up from an estimated 1.31% in 2023 and from 1.2% in 2022. That’s all short of NATO’s 2% target, which Carney has vowed to meet by 2030, but not as low as Trump claimed.

Canadians’ views on becoming the 51st state: Trump falsely claimed to reporters in January that “the people of Canada like” his idea of Canada joining the US. In fact, poll after poll has shown the idea is massively unpopular with the people of Canada. It has been vehemently rejected by Carney and other Canadian political leaders from left to right.

Canada’s tariffs in general: Trump falsely claimed in a social media post in March that Canada is “ONE OF THE HIGHEST TARIFFING NATIONS ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD.” In fact, Canada has long had relatively low tariffs, though it has this year announced a series of new retaliatory tariffs on the US in direct response to Trump’s own new tariffs on Canada. Canada was just 102nd-highest on a World Bank list of 137 countries’ trade-weighted average tariff rates in 2022, the last year for which the data is available – and had a lower average (1.37%) than the United States (1.49%) that year, the most recent for which the data is available.

Canada’s dairy tariffs and former President Joe Biden: Trump falsely claimed to reporters in March that he had Canada’s dairy-tariff situation “well taken care of” at the time he left office the first time, “but under Biden, they just kept raising it.” In fact, Canada did not raise its dairy tariffs during the Biden administration. The tariffs Trump is denouncing were left in place by the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement he signed in 2018, though that agreement did secure greater US access to the Canadian dairy market.

Trump has also persistently failed to mention that Canada’s high dairy tariffs only kick in after the US has hit a certain Trump-negotiated quantity of tariff-free dairy sales to Canada each year – and as the US dairy industry acknowledges, the US is not hitting its zero-tariff maximum in any category of dairy product, so the tariffs aren’t being applied.

Exemptions from Canada’s dairy tariffs: Trump falsely claimed in April that Canada has low tariffs on only one carton of milk imported from the US, but then imposes massive tariffs on all other US milk imports. In reality, Canada guaranteed in the USMCA that tens of thousands of metric tons of imported US milk per year, not merely a single carton, will face zero tariffs.

Canada’s imports of US agricultural products: Trump, speaking of Canada, claimed in February that “they don’t take our agricultural product for the most part”; he mentioned dairy, then said, “A little bit they do, but not much.” This is false even with Trump’s qualifiers. Canada was the world’s second-largest buyer of US agricultural exports in 2024, according to the US Department of Agriculture, purchasing about $28.4 billion worth.

While Canada does limit foreign access to its dairy, egg and poultry markets in particular, these are exceptions rather than the rule. The US Department of Agriculture notes on its website that “almost all” US agricultural exports to Canada face zero tariffs or quotas, and that “Canada consistently ranks among our top markets for agricultural product exports, representing one of our most significant and reliable trading partners.”

Canada and US banks: Trump falsely claimed in both February and March that Canada prohibits US banks. While Canada’s tight regulations have discouraged many foreign banks from opening retail branches there, Canada does not forbid these banks; in fact, US banks have been operating in Canada for well over a century.

The Canadian Bankers Association industry group said in a February statement that “there are 16 US-based bank subsidiaries and branches with around C$113 billion in assets currently operating in Canada” and that “U.S. banks now make up approximately half of all foreign bank assets in Canada.”

Canada, Russia and China: Trump falsely claimed in January that Canada joining the US would secure Canada “from the threat of the Russian and Chinese Ships that are constantly surrounding them.” Canada has never been surrounded by Russian and Chinese ships, let alone been “constantly” surrounded. In fact, a smattering of Russian and Chinese military ships and jets, as well as Chinese research vessels viewed with suspicion by Canada and the US, have been occasionally spotted in recent years in the vicinity of the US state of Alaska – and have been monitored or intercepted by the Canadian and US militaries.

The Canadian government did warn in December that among the “potential threats” in its Arctic region were “increased Russian activity in Canadian air approaches” and “China’s regular deployment of dual-use – having both research and military application – research vessels and surveillance platforms to collect data.” But that’s not the same as being “surrounded.”

Source: CNN

Friday, April 25, 2025

Donald the Hun

Donald Trump lusts to rule the entire North American Continent -- meaning he wants to steal Canada. Hitler had the same impulse with respect to all of Europe that was not Germany.

Trump's idea is to occupy Canada -- a country that could be acquired only by military force, and then insult the citizens of the occupied land by granting them the status of just one American state, notwithstanding that Canada is larger than all of lower 49 states combined and has more people than the combined population of America's 22 smallest states.

Yeah, well, drop dead Trump you senile megaliomaniac and the Hell with any Americans who support him in his Hitlerian fantasies. 

Trump says Canada would ‘cease to exist’ without the U.S.  More silly bugger lies and nonsense from the great American Hitler wannabe who has threatened the occupation and extinction of Canada
And Now This From US Secretary of State Marko Rubio: 
 "we actually don’t like the way they treated us when it comes to trade."
LOL. By "they" he means we killer Canadians. Poor American bastards being outwitted and robbed blind by a bunch of wily Canucks.
But then Rubio had to make a show of support for his lunatic boss so we won't hold this drivel against him. 
Trump lies like Hitler. 
Trump doesn't think military force will be needed to make Canada the "51st state"

I've never owned a gun, but  now may be the time to get one:

Vive le Canada

Tuesday, April 22, 2025

Senator Ron Johnson Links WTC Building 7 Collapse to 9/11 ‘Cover-Up’, Demands New Investigation Into the Attacks

 Building 7 was a block-long, multi-storey, office building that collapsed on 9/11. It was struck by debris from the collapsing Twin Towers which was said to have started a low intensity fire. Building 7 then sank gracefully to earth as if on an elevator going down. 

Some "conspiracy theorists" (CIA copyright terminology) find it hard to understand how a low intensity fire could have brought down a block-long building in such a fashion -- every supporting structure giving way at the same moment. So, yeah,Ron Johnson could be on to something, albeit over twenty years too late.

'Building 7 Controlled Demolition?': Republican Senator Plans Shock 9/11 Hearings, Says 'My Eyes Have Been Opened'

Richard Gage: 10 Facts You May Not Know About 9/11

America's Cold War victory over the Soviet Union was due almost entirely to a better class of bullshit, which enabled a psychopathic elite to fool most of the people most of the time -- about 9/11 and much else.

For the ruling elite, headed at the time by the psychopathic George W. Bush, the value of 9/11 was that it allowed a reduction in civil liberties, and a large expansion in the government's power of intrusion into and control over the lives of citizens.

It will be interesting to see how page views of this site will be reduced as a result of today's post.

British Lion in Defense of National Genocide

 French “Great Replacement” Philosopher Renaud Camus Banned From Entering UK

Britain's ruling elite, like that of Canada and most other Western nations, is intent on the genocide of its own people and their replacement by migrants of a different race, religion and culture. Hence, the suppression of comment by people like Renaud Camus on the fact that public policy aims to suppress the fertility of the native population during  an alien invasion.

Here are the facts: 

UK fertility rate: 

1.57 children per woman and falling, versus the maintenance rate of 2.1

in 2024 there were:

        591,000 births in the UK. of which 37% were to at least one            non-UK born parent

        An estimated 300,000 abortions

In addition, there were 728,000 net migrants to the UK.

The Brits are thus being genocided by their own elite by means of fertility suppression, pro-abortion policies, and mass replacement immigration that plays a key role in the suppression of native fertility by raising the cost of housing while driving down wages. 

And yes, this is the Trudeau - Carney government policy in Canada too. 

Trump Exploring Ways to Resolve America’s Demogaphic Crisis — Including $5,000 ‘Baby Bonus’ For Mothers


That won't cut it. Mothers should have a lifetime share of their child's father's income. 

Why are Democrat Politicians and Judges So Hysterical and Desperate to Protect Illegal Alien Thugs, Gangsters, Gangbangers & Terrorists?

“This Is Displacement, Not Immigration”: Muslims Now Majority in Vienna Schools as Freedom Party Sounds Alarm Over ‘Great Replacement’

Meantime: The people of Sweden continue on their path to total self-extinction

Sweden Offers Migrants $61K Incentive to Leave Europe - That may cause some to leave, but won't it encourage more to come?

Saturday, April 19, 2025

The White House: LAB LEAK,The True Origins of Covid 19

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.



Funny thing though, Covid was reported to be circulating in the United States and Europe well before the Wuhan Lab leak. (There were some links for that, but probably scrubbed from the Google database by now).

US intelligence agencies have found no direct evidence that Covid-19 broke out from a Chinese laboratory - declassified report

Wednesday, April 16, 2025

Trump’s tariffs: a beacon of Catholic social teaching

By Gavin Ashenden 

The Catholic HeraldThe moment a nation’s debt exceeds its GDP, the economic situation moves into banana-republic territory. This ought to cause deep alarm—but equally concerning is the realisation that we are presented with only one side of the argument in the public space.

These are two serious causes for concern for all of us.

President Trump has proposed a radical reform of America’s trading relationships to rescue its economy. Astonishingly, however, the world’s media appears to have moved into panic mode over Trumpian tariffs.

The assumption in the commentary is that all sensible people should position themselves somewhere on a scale between outrage and panic. Yet Catholic social teaching may offer some balm for a disturbed Western economic digestion, partly because it prioritises protecting the poor.


Commentators’ imaginations have been inflamed due to threats to the current world order, which is based on a trading equilibrium between nations. The American government’s strategy to apply tariffs mirroring and reciprocating the financial hurdles other countries impose on American trade has triggered almost universal outrage.

Occasionally, voices have pointed out that current trading arrangements do nothing to address the gargantuan debt crisis. The American national debt has exceeded $36 trillion, a figure which may mean little to most people—but the ratio of debt to GDP should be alarming: it is currently 122 per cent.


In Britain, since the beginning of the 21st century, government debt has escalated from 33 per cent of GDP to the current level of 100 per cent.


For those of us for whom economic theory is at least as complex and inscrutable as the nominalist theology of the 14th century, these figures should ring the loudest of alarm bells. They mean both the UK and the US economies are sliding inexorably into the quicksand of indebtedness, from which there is no recovery or escape short of a complete economic collapse in the West.


Trump has made it clear that, since the present economic order is unsustainable—particularly for the US economy—he aims to reconfigure trading relationships, beginning by establishing reciprocity between the US and its trading partners.

Who is likely to be most drastically affected by runaway debt pushing economies over the cliff? Undoubtedly, the rich will have large percentages wiped off their portfolios—but it will be the poor who cannot afford to eat. It is worth remembering that in the US, 94 per cent of stocks and shares are owned by only eight per cent of Americans. Thus, volatility on the stock market may or may not constructively affect the economy, but it primarily impacts the very rich, not the poor.


The poor are most immediately affected by the price of essentials. Two central principles of Catholic social teaching involve pursuing options for the poor and vulnerable and ensuring the dignity of work and the rights of workers. Will the proposed tariff reset help with that?


Trump’s strategy is to reduce an overpriced stock market by approximately 20 per cent. This will drive investors towards Treasury bonds, seeking stability in government-issued securities. In turn, this allows the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates. Such circumstances would create a new platform from which the US government could renegotiate interest payments on trillions of dollars of debt, thus bringing greater stability to the American economy.


This strategy itself represents a defence of the interests of the poor, especially since this deflationary process lowers prices for ordinary Americans. Despite Chinese propaganda depicting overweight Americans trapped in new factory sweatshops, tariff resets may persuade global businesses to relocate back to the States, providing more jobs—particularly for the poor.


The mainstream media’s capacity to misrepresent tariff negotiations seems limitless. Observers of Trump’s technique will note he pursues “the art of the deal”. His opening position is often shocking and outrageous, designed deliberately to destabilise and seize the initiative. When played out publicly, this causes literal-minded commentators to howl with outrage. Wholly unable to recognise or handle strategic hyperbole, they take him literally and are undone.


The tariff stand-off is yet another example. Trump begins with an aggressive move that deeply unsettles competing negotiators. Then, as so often, he pauses—for 90 days in this case—and waits for a more sensible, accommodating response closer to the median compromise he envisaged all along. He is a wealthy businessman who neither needs his salary nor his job. Yet, he puts his political independence at the service not of the super-rich, who always survive, nor of the comfortable who have a “plan B”, but at the service of the indebted poor, those who have no savings, and those who work two jobs to pay rent and eat.


Commentators whose opinions saturate the media fail to understand either Trump’s technique or his ultimate objective. Catholics have particular reason to be grateful for the platform given to JD Vance, who offers a vision of Catholic ethics as one of several resources potentially guiding government strategy.

 

Is Trump fully guided by Catholic faith or vision? No. But has he accorded it a privileged position among the ideological and ethical resources the administration may draw on? Although some Catholics express disappointment with certain ethical priorities of the administration, the answer must be “yes”.


Should Trump fail in his attempt to rebalance tariff barriers between the US and its trading partners, the consequences could be catastrophic. The existing global order based on globalisation is already faltering, poised for further breakdown that could trigger civilisational collapse. The poor are always the earliest and most vulnerable casualties. Trump, therefore, might represent their only genuine economic hope.

Monday, April 14, 2025

Trump Tariffs: The Response to Unfair Chinese Trade Practises and Patent Theft

 Drieu Godefridi

In a world where the global economy bristles with grievances, lamentations and threats, the U.S. tariffs against China arouse anger and incomprehension. Labeled as retrograde protectionism, these tariffs – of up to 145% – are nonetheless defensible in the light of Adam Smith, titan of liberal thought. Far from caricatures, Smith, in The Wealth of Nations (1776), was no zealot of unilateral free trade. His nuances, rooted in pragmatism, offer a surprising reading grid for understanding Republican politics.

China closed

Let’s start by setting the scene. The United States, in imposing these tariffs, aims to rebalance a Sino-American trade relationship that it deems iniquitous: an abysmal trade deficit ($400 billion in 2018, before the first tariffs), systematic and even systemic theft of intellectual property by Beijing, and a worrying strategic dependence for key sectors such as steel or semiconductors.

Purists cry scandal, invoking free trade and peace through commerce. But what is Adam Smith really saying?

The author of The Wealth of Nations certainly despised artificial restrictions. Take his criticism of tariffs favoring local monopolies: “To give the monopoly of the home-market to the produce of domestic industry, in any particular art or manufacture, is in some measure to direct private people in what manner they ought to employ their capitals, and must, in almost all cases, be either a useless or a hurtful regulation.” (Book IV, Chapter II). At first glance, U.S. tariffs, by protecting American steel or electronics, for example, are open to criticism. They distort the market, make goods more expensive for the US consumer, and risk diverting capital to less competitive industries. The figures bear this out: tariffs cost around 0.2% of US GDP in 2019, a toll paid by households via higher prices.

First exception: national defense

But Smith did admit exceptions, and the first resonates with US rhetoric: national defense. The Navigation Act, or more precisely the Navigation Acts, refers to a series of laws passed by the British Parliament between 1651 and 1733 to regulate trade within the British Empire. Their aim was to maintain England’s strategic and maritime primacy. Let’s read Smith: “The act of navigation is not favourable to foreign commerce, or to the opulence which can arise from it… As defence, however, is of much more importance than opulence, the act of navigation is, perhaps, the wisest of all the commercial regulations of England.” (Book IV, Chapter II).

Trump’s aim in taxing Chinese steel from 2018 is not just to resurrect American blast furnaces (although the symbol has panache). It’s about reducing dependence on a geopolitical rival whose rise threatens American security. In 2017, China produced 50% of the world’s steel – with an output of around 831 million metric tons out of a global total of around 1.69 billion tons, according to World Steel Association data – often subsidized, crushing competitors with fire-sale prices. If America loses its ability to produce strategic materials, what does it become in the event of conflict? A nation of traders, influencers, and woke whiners? Smith, a pragmatist, would have understood the argument: security takes precedence over short-term advantage.

Read More

Sunday, April 13, 2025

Our Friends in Kiev

By Lucas Leiroz

Strategic Culture Foundation: 

Since the 2014 coup and under the command of the illegitimate Maidan junta regime, Ukraine has increasingly exhibited signs of a terrorist state. Under the guise of defending “European values,” the Kiev regime has consistently violated international law, adopted prohibited methods of warfare, and openly supported neo-Nazi formations.

As well known, in recent years, Ukraine has committed war crimes and terrorism against civilians, especially in Donbass and the Belgorod and Kursk regions, where the Ukrainian army and nationalist groups carry out barbaric attacks against cities, destroying vital infrastructure such as homes, schools, and hospitals. Thousands of civilians, including children, have lost their lives in artillery bombardments, justified by the Kiev regime as part of a “fight against separatists/invaders.” However, the evidence reveals that this has always been a deliberate terrorist campaign against the civilian population, not a legitimate military confrontation.

Furthermore, the Ukrainian regime resorts to the use of prohibited weapons such as cluster munitions and landmines, particularly in residential areas, which is strictly prohibited by international conventions. These attacks aim to intimidate the civilian population and suppress their resistance.

Read more

Monday, March 31, 2025

The Trump Putin Phone Call

 Trump:

     Privyet Vlad

Putin: 

    Hey Don

Trump:

    Enjoy the dumplings in Odessa

Putin:    

    Enjoy the duck hunting in Nunavut

Trump:

    All agreed then?

Putin:

    Absolyutno

Impeach Trump

Trump wants to annex Greenland

    he is prepared to do it by armed force.

Greenland is more than twice the size of France, 

     four times the size of Britain,  

     almost six times the size of Japan.

Trump has also mused openly about taking Canada, 

    Canada is five times the size of Greenland,

    and even larger than the United States itself.

Trump is looking at the World as Hitler did:

     what to steal next?

     who to smash next?

Trump, is a maniac,

Which is to say, insane.

A great power with an insane leader risks starting a world war.

A world war today would likely end in a nuclear conflagration.

The United States Congress should act now to prevent catastrophe.


Thinks armed force will be unnecessary ... Greenlanders will just submit. 

Thinks the same with Canada.

Rightly so unless Carney negotiates something with the EU better than a trade deal. 

As for the planes, what use is there now for a license to build-your-own planes over the course of the next ten or twenty years.

Meantime,


Which would take him to a super-senile 86th year. 

And if Trump lived that long, he'd no doubt demand another four years. 

As Trump reveals, power is a highly addictive drug.

America is ruled by a senile, overweigh, paranoid, drug addict.

Friday, March 28, 2025

The European Peoples Are Committing Suicide

 Authored by Paul Weston via X:

A few harsh realities to consider: 

1) The hard-left has infiltrated all Western institutions and actively seeks to undermine and subvert all Western nations - regardless of which particular puppet politician is in power. 

2) Most countries within Western Europe will see their native young become a minority well before 2050. 

3) Western countries currently operate on the principle that foreign people and foreign cultures are intrinsically good, whilst European culture and people are irredeemably evil. 

4) This sets up the neo-Marxist agenda of the oppressed and the oppressor which copies the early 20th century revolutionary ideology of Marxist-Leninism where the working class was designated as the oppressed, and the bourgeoisie the oppressor. 

5) The result of this was the murder of 100 million people deemed the "oppressor" in Communist Russia and Communist China. 

6) Islam is currently designated the "oppressed" by all Western institutions, regardless of the fact that Islam is a supremacist ideology with a 1,400-year history of imperial expansion and warfare. Europeans are designated the "oppressor" even as they yield to every edict of "diversity" ladled upon them. 

7) Islam will politically control much of Western Europe before 2050 as a result of rapidly declining native demographics, coupled with rapidly expanding Islamic demographics and single-minded bloc voting for Islamic political parties. 

8) Few politicians or journalists (none in England...) will talk about this, let alone state what should be done to halt the overthrow of Western Europe. People who do talk about it are liable to be arrested for Hate Crime and imprisoned. 

9) This represents an existential crisis which threatens our very survival as a people, a culture, and an entire continent. We are a dwindling demographic deemed the oppressor by our own Traitor Class, even as a growing demographic with a supremacist belief system is forced upon us by the Traitor Class - which maintains our potential future masters are the oppressed. The history of Lenin, Stalin and Mao with regard to the oppressed and the oppressor does not bode well for the European people. 

10) We have little time left, but most people cling to the naïve belief that we can somehow vote our way out of this terrible situation. I don't entirely discount this possibility, but I do believe that should the AfD in Germany or Marine Le Pen in France threaten to win an election in a landslide, they would never be allowed to take power. The EU criminals in the Commission - and they really are criminals - have already intimated they will ban "far-right" parties capable of winning elections - and recently did just that in Romania.

All in all then, not good, as Jerry Seinfeld might say. I'm sorry if people find this depressing, but I do think it is a matter of crucial importance that our situation be properly understood. After all, if we don't realise how bad things are, we will be unable to plan any possible salvation.

White British now little more than one third of London's population, or how European governments are destroying their white population to the benefit of migrants. Naturally, it's the same in Canada, the US and Oz. 

Meantime, in South Africa, the government openly promotes the murder of white people

Wednesday, March 26, 2025

Canada: Where Bureaucrats Rule

Canada would be a great place to live if the people had a choke-hold over government. Sadly, it's the other way around. For example, fish. With over a quarter of a million kilometers of coastline on three oceans, you'd think Canada would have fish. In fact Canada does have fish. Trouble is, it costs. It costs a lot. Two small pieces of sockeye salmon, eight to ten bucks. But that's only half of it. You already paid that much in Federal Government tax. Canada's Fisheries Administration spent $4.7 billion last year almost as much as the national fish harvest is worth. So first you paid for your fish in taxes at the rate of $45.00 a pound, then you paid about the same again at the supermarket fish counter. 

Which could make one wonder: do we need the luxury of so much government? For example, the Treasury Board Secretariat, which is said to provide "advice and support to ensure government spending is efficient, effective and aligned with priorities." Well nothing wrong with spending efficiently, which is to say spending that achieves maximum productivity with a minimum of wasted effort or expense. But at an annual cost of $9.3 billion, or around a thousand dollars per family of four, is this monitor of government efficiency itself efficient? The price of fish, when the cost of Fisheries Administration is taken into account, suggests not.

The case of the Treasury Board Secretariat indicates the need for a review of all Federal Government expenditure, which totalled $449 billion in 2024, an amount that exceeds revenue by $49 billion, thereby generating a yearly addition to public debt of a cool $1,225.00 for every man, woman and child. So yes, in addition to taxes to cover ongoing expenditures, a family of four is on the hook for the cost of servicing the additional $4,900 per person in Federal Government debt incurred just last year. But not to worry. The Feds will just add last year's debt to the $90,000 the Feds have already borrowed in the name of every living Canadian, including the old, the sick, the panhandlers, and the young, the babes in arms, and those remaining until their late 20s or early 30s in publicly funded so-called education. And yes, if you're in the work force, you're one of the noble minority shouldering the service cost of that monstrous debt. 

To some this may seem a time for tumbrils and guillotines. But for the most part, Canadians are not a sanguinary people, moreover a bloodless way to deal with a spendthrift elite is easily to be found. First, enact a balanced budget law. Second, eliminate the Canada Revenue Agency and the income tax. Third, triple the GST to 15%. The result?

Eliminating the income tax would save Government the $18 billion a year now spent on tax collection, but reduce revenue by $200 billion. This would spare citizens both the time and the misery of an annual tax filing, plus those hefty tax deductions from every pay cheque. As for the loss of Government revenue, it could be largely made up by raising the GST to 15% -- well below Europe's average rate of 21%, but delivering $96 billion a year in additional revenue. 

In accordance with these measures, annual government revenue would fall short of the current total by $84 billion. This however, would be offset by eliminating the Treasury Board Secretariat, for a yearly saving of $9.3 billion (For providing that so valuable advice, remember.). The remaining deficit of $75 billion could surely be eliminated by deleting, in addition to the Treasury Board Secretariat, a few other grotesquely expensive advisory bodies to whose advice, one suspects, no one pays the slightest attention.

Monday, March 24, 2025

Donald Trump, American Totalitarian

By 

It didn’t take long for Donald Trump to show his true colors.

Trump won a landslide election last November primarily on the promise to STOP America’s “stupid” wars. It is now obvious to everyone that, while Trump might be able to negotiate a deal to stop the war in Ukraine—a war that Russia has already won—he is decidedly intent on accelerating and expanding U.S. wars in the Middle East.

But as soon as I tell the truth about the morbid duplicity of Trump’s mind and the moral derangement of Trump’s heart, evangelicals ferociously respond with examples of the “good” things he is doing, as if any of that erases the evil he is inflicting on both America and the world.

Evangelicals are eaten up with the disease of Prophetic Dispensationalism and see Trump as a harbinger of their eschatology. Prophetic Dispensationalism is a moral and spiritual cancer that befalls the brain and hardens the heart. And it is an epidemic among evangelicals.

Read more

Sunday, March 23, 2025

Canada Foils Trump's Hitlerian Plan for a North American Anschluss

The term "Anschluss" applied to Nazi Germany's annexation of Austria on March 12, 1938 and it applies as well to Trump's insolent, Hitlerian, and as it turns out, stupid attempt to make Canada, a country somewhat larger than the USA itself, America's 51st state. 

Happily for Canadians, Trump's scheme was adroitly defeated by Canada's abrupt realignment with Europe by way of the Canada-Europe Trade Agreement (CETA). This agreement joins Canada with a large, technologically advanced, and highly diverse trade association that provides access to advanced weapons technology. That means access to the Swedish-designed fighter aircraft, the Saab Viggen, which Canada will build for itself in place of the US-built F-35 of which Canada had intended to purchase 88 copies, at a cost of almost C$20 billion -- or two thousand dollars for every Canadian family of four. 

So much for Trump's dumb decision to impose a tariff wall obstructing trade with America's Northern neighbor and largest trade partner.

Saturday, March 15, 2025

Canada Defects from the US: Will Build Swedish Designed Fighter Aircraft While Growing Trade Relations with the European Union

Ha ha! Tired of insults from a demented American President, "The Fifty-First State" has cancelled its order for American built F-35 warplanes. Beyond 16 of the American aircraft already paid for, Canada has opted to equip the Royal Canadian Airforce with the Swedish designed, Saab Viggen. 

The Saab is designed for operation in a cold climate, can land on a dirt track -- in the Canadian Arctic, for example, and will be built in Canada, creating 6,000 well paid jobs. 

In trade, Canada will pursue closer ties with the European Union under the terms of CETA, the Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement.

 The Saab Viggen:
 SAAB JA 37 Viggen 

Thursday, March 13, 2025

Greenland: a Natural Fit For the Canadian Confederation

 Greenland is just twenty-two kilometers from Ellsmere Island, Canadian territory inhabited by the close relatives of Greenland's indigenous Innuit people. 

But Greenlanders are said to be interested in joining the United States, a land with which they have no ethnic or cultural connection, and at its nearest point -- the town of Pohenegahook, Maine -- one hundred times more distant than the closest Canadian territory. 

Well if Greenlanders were to choose union with the US of A, then good luck to them. But you'd think they'd give the Canadian option consideration. Canada, in the meantime, might make them a serious offer. 

Sure Canada wouldn't flood the place with money to the extent that the Americans could. But it is also the most unlikely that Canada would turn the place into a military base, and hence a prime target in war -- something the US of A could hardly refrain from doing. 

While militarization would bring investment to the island, it would also, in the event of a global conflict, bring the risk of anihilation. A remote Canadian island of no military significance, on the other hand, would have an excellent chance of surviving untouched in the tragic event of a world conflagration.

Canada's enfeebled Liberal Government should focus for a minute on Greenland and consider making the islanders a friendly invite.  

Greenland's Pro-Independence Election Winners Brush Back Trump, Who Asserts Annexation By US "Will Happen" :

... the center-right Demokraatit party just won Greenland’s parliamentary elections this week, and Greenland’s likely new prime minister, Jens-Frederik Nielsen, has surprised many by quickly coming out so strongly against Trump's rhetoric on Greenland:

"We don’t want to be Americans. No, we don’t want to be Danes. We want to be Greenlanders, and we want our own independence in the future," Nielsen, 33, told Britain’s Sky News. "And we want to build our own country by ourselves."

Mark Carney, the Canadian Prime Minister No One Voted For

The Parliamentary Liberal Party in Ottawa has made the unelected banker, Mark Carney, Canada's Prime Minister. 

Carney seized the day by seizing the Conservative Party's platform. Specifically, he "Axed the Tax", which is to say the carbon tax, which is a tax on energy: oil, gas, coal, etc. What, then, is left for the Tories to run on? 

Easy peasy: AXE THE TAX. The income tax, that is. 

And let the Liberals steal that too. After all, it will be obvious by then that the only intelligence in Ottawa is coming from the Tories, albeit their ideas are being implemented by brain-dead Liberals. 

Some, will immediately raise the objection that we need the income tax to run the government. But that is quite untrue. There are plenty of other taxes. The GST, remember. And all sorts of fees and licenses that people must pay while going about their business. 

What's more, Ottawa can and should massively cut expenditure. 

How?

(1)  Axe the bureaucrats, a large proportion of whom do little more than sit at a desk waiting to qualify for a pension. (I know. I worked in Ottawa as a Public Servant. I was given an assignment, which I completed in eight months. After that, there was nothing obvious to do but join with colleagues in sitting at a desk for decades waiting for a pension -- so I quit.) 

(2) Install a DeepSeek type computer system that not only speaks with members of the public but give them instant access to whatever government information they require, for example, about their taxes, pension or other matters.

Yup, go for it Pierre. Continue the call to Axe the Tax.

Saturday, March 8, 2025

Fat Lady From the State Department Named in Trump Assination Plot

Victoria Nuland: Ukraine Has ...

Former National Security Advisor Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn accused former Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland of being a central figure in an alleged plot to assassinate President Donald Trump, suggesting a broader conspiracy involving multiple individuals both within and outside the government. 

Nuland played a central role in the launch of the Ukraine war and must hate Trump for seeking to end it. Presumably, therefore, she much regrets that Thomas Crooks' bullet only nicked Trump's ear. 

Nuland in 2014, at the launch of the Ukraine war: "Fuck the EU"

Nuland might more realistically have said "Fuck Ukraine" where the war resulting from her diplomacy has killed close on a million Ukrainians.