Showing posts with label tyranny. Show all posts
Showing posts with label tyranny. Show all posts

Sunday, April 28, 2024

Viktor Orban: Liberal subversion across the West drives crashing birthrates, soaring divorce rates, broken families, and an education system focused on indoctrination not academic achievement"

During his speech at the third annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Budapest, Hungary, Hungary's President, Viktor Orbán, noted that "across the West, liberals resort to both court action and intelligence service spying to silence their opponents."

 [Justin Trudeau sequestered bank accounts too].

Orbán described five additional methods of oppression being deployed by liberals to silence the opposition:


1. Change the meaning of words

The first step Orbán describes is liberal actions designed to change the meaning of words and phrases in order to mislead the people, with the issue of migration being the most substantial example of this trend.

“The first step of progressive liberals, their oppression, is to make normal mean the exact opposite. War is peace. That is what progressives still say today. The Peace Facility. That’s the name of the Brussels financial fund from which the most destructive weapons are sent to the front. Migration is a resource, they say, while crime is rising, the threat of terror is increasing and trust is being drained from our societies,” said Orbán.

Orban noted that Hungary has been able to withstand this sea change, making it a “unique location in all of Europe.”

“It is the fact that, while the whole of Europe is being swamped by an ocean of progressive liberalism, a conservative island has survived (in Hungary), an Island of Deference, defying the liberal tide, the Brussels blast, and the Washington hurricane. Not only defying but surviving, even thriving, even succeeding, even triumphing and triumphing again and again.”

2. Invert everything that is normal

The second step on the path to liberals maintaining power is to invert everything that is normal, including sexuality, education, family life, love of country, and ethnic homogeneity.

“The second step is to start spreading this inverted normality by state means. Anyone who thinks otherwise is problematic. There is something wrong with that. Anyone who disagrees is either ignorant or insane. The perception must be that listening to them would lead to some fatal disaster,” said Orbán.

This method helps tear families apart, mock cultural and national traditions, and normalize behavior that up until just a few decades ago was considered beyond the pale, Orbán told the conference, adding that liberal subversion had led to “crashing birthrates, soaring divorces, broken families, and a failing education system that focuses more on ideology than academic greatness.”

“All of this is fertile breeding ground for left-wing parties to thrive and paint conservatives and the right as “backward” and deserving of political suppression and even outright violence,” he said.

3. Make the right into a “security threat”

The next step is to create an aura of “danger” around right-wing and conservative views, which will help the state justify any action taken against conservatives. In the United States, this includes, for example, portraying supporters of Donald Trump as terrorists, or equating any right-wing view as “Nazi.”

“You are made to believe that you hold dangerous views and that you are also a security risk. They send some kind of democracy watchdog at you, which then finds out that you do not share the views of normality they preach, and are therefore a radical whose freedom of speech can be safely restricted,” Orban said.

This particular step has played out across social media, where conservatives and the right face enormous censorship. However, NGOs and organizations, many of whom are lavishly funded by governments, corporations, and billionaire oligarchs such as George Soros, are actively working to silence and persecute conservatives. As Remix News has reported, they are deeply embedded in the major social media networks, and work to police conservative thought and views.

Demonizing conservatives was also evident just last week in Brussels after another conservative conference in which Orbán and many other high-profile politicians from Europe were speaking, was shut down by the local mayor citing public safety concerns.

It took the lawyers of the National Conservatism conference to file last-minute motions in Belgium’s top administrative court to ensure the conference could continue for its second day.

4. The press goes on the attack

In the fourth step, the liberal press targets you, often personally, while the state turns civilians into a mob of informers, Orbán warned.

“They deploy activists who use legal means to silence you. Then, the often anonymous profiles on the internet come to denounce you on social media, while a plethora of civilians bombard the courts and state bodies with complaints and denunciations,” he added.

5. Send the authorities in

“And if you still have the stomach for it, and if you’re still standing, the fifth step is for the public authorities to spring into action. They receive so many complaints and denunciations that they are obliged to investigate you, unfortunately, so they become the private institutions of the progressives,” the Hungarian prime minister explained.

“They will find that the accusations of the press, the concerns of the watchdogs, are well founded, they will prosecute yo,u and you will eventually be silenced by state means. That is what they do to Hungary in Brussels, and that is what they do to conservatives in progressive, liberal European capitals.”

Orbán noted that the same thing was happening in the United States where the judiciary was being utilized in an attempt to get President Trump off the ballot for the upcoming presidential election.

He also pointed to the German government’s actions against the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party. Due unique laws in Germany, the authorities have been able to label the AfD a “definite case of right-wing extremism” in key eastern states. In turn, this gives intelligence services authority to monitor communications, including phone calls, messages, and emails, between AfD politicians and members — all without a warrant.

“This is what happened in the European Union when they tried to ban Tucker Carlson by administrative means. It is happening in Germany, where political parties are being monitored by the secret services. And it happened in Finland when they wanted to condemn a politician and a bishop for quoting Scripture. Ladies and gentlemen, that is where we are.”

A new era for Europe

The Hungarian leader expressed hope, however, that the tide could turn should the people desire it at the forthcoming polls across the West, including the European Parliamentary elections in June.

He said the elections could help “end an inglorious era of Western civilization” and help defeat a “progressive liberal hegemony” that has only served to bring “war, chaos, and unrest” to Europe, as well as a collapsing economy and confusion to the world.

Instead, the European electorate could vote in favor of a new “world spirit” that promotes nation-state sovereignty as its core principle.

“In that world, national interest will determine the movement of states, and each independent nation will act in its own national interest. I also believe that in a sovereign world order, the real sovereign is the people, as our guests would say, popular sovereignty.

“I hope that it will no longer be NGOs of all kinds, big business, media outlets, dubious experts, and out-of-touch academics who tell us what is right and what should be done, but elected representatives and politicians elected by the people.”

In a rallying cry to fellow conservatives, Orbán urged them to “saddle up, arm up, take to the battlefield, and let the electoral battle begin,” calling for a “return to the peaceful and secure path that made the West great.”

Monday, February 5, 2024

The Resistible Rise of The New Normal Reich

 By C.J. Hopkins

So, the German authorities have filed an appeal to overturn my acquittal in criminal court last week. Apparently, their plan is to keep putting me on trial until they get a judge who is willing to convict me of something, or to bankrupt me with legal costs. Silly me, for a moment there, I was actually starting to believe this was over.

Let me quickly review how I got here for anyone just tuning in.

I am an author and a political satirist and commentator. In August 2022, I posted two Tweets criticizing mask mandates and making fun of Karl Lauterbach, Germany’s Minister of Health. Both Tweets included an image from the cover artwork of my latest book, The Rise of The New Normal Reich: Consent Factory Essays, Vol. III (2020-2021).

The German authorities did not appreciate those Tweets, so they (1) had them censored by Twitter, (2) had Amazon ban my book in Germany, and (3) dragged me into criminal court and prosecuted me on trumped-up “hate crime” charges.

Last week, a judge acquitted me of those charges, after which she launched into a tirade in which she insulted me at some length, and then strapped on a “Covid mask” and stalked out of the courtroom. During her diatribe, she made a big show of proclaiming that, by acquitting me of the fabricated hate-crime charges, she was proving that “Germany is not a totalitarian state” … you know, the kind of totalitarian state where books are banned, political speech is censored, and dissident authors are harassed by the police and subjected to ridiculous show trials.

The judge didn’t have much choice but to acquit me, because the relevant German law is clear, as my attorney had reminded her in his pretrial pleading, and because my case had received some international press. Also, the public gallery was packed, and there was a fair amount of independent media in the courtroom. Unlike the German mainstream media, which have been churning out government propaganda like the proverbial Goebbelsian keyboard instrument for years, and which were too busy covering the totally-organic government-sponsored mass demonstrations against the government’s only political opposition to devote any attention to my political prosecution, the banning of my book, government censorship, and so on, some of the alternative German media are still interested in actual journalism.

The prosecutor, who appeared to be drunk or on some kind of high-grade sedatives, was very clearly unhappy to be there performing in front of a sold-out house. He spent the proceedings hidden behind one of those Plexiglass “anti-Covid” panels that cashiers still have to sit behind in grocery stores and other retail establishments, so I couldn’t make out every word he slurred. The gist of his argument was, although I didn’t intend to “disseminate pro-Nazi propaganda,” I nonetheless “disseminated pro-Nazi propaganda,” by comparing New Normal Germany to Nazi Germany, and “unnecessarily using a swastika in an artwork.”

Read more

Related:

COVID-19 masks provided NO PROTECTION during “pandemic,” British government now admits

Texas AG: Pfizer lied about efficacy of COVID vaccine, which is less than 10%

Thursday, April 28, 2022

Globe and Mail Touts Bullshit Medical Journal Article Blaming the Unvaccinated for Covid Infection of the Vaccinated

Anyone familiar with the scientific literature knows that that most published research findings are false (and here). So when the media push a claim to scientific fact bearing on a highly contentious political issue, consider the evidence before accepting the claim.

In relation to the Toronto Globe and Mail's headline of April 24 claiming that the Unvaccinated increase risk of infection for others: study skepticism is certainly warranted because, so far as it relates to Covid-19, the claim is untrue.

The article begins: 

People who have not been vaccinated against Covid-19 contribute disproportionately to the risk of infection among those who have been vaccinated, according to a new study ...

Oh yes? 

Who says? 

Who says is J. Fishman et al., in an article in the current issue of the Canadian Medical Association Journal entitled: 

Impact of population mixing between vaccinated and unvaccinated subpopulations on infectious disease dynamics: implications for SARS-CoV-2 transmission

Trouble is, the paper reports what is a purely mathematical exercise, based on no real world data whatsoever. That this is a problem becomes evident if one considers the real world data that would be needed to confirm the authors' conclusions. 

In particular, data would be necessary to show at least one of the following things:

(1) That unvaccinated persons have a higher Covid-19 infection rate than the vaccinated;

(2) That unvaccinated persons infected with Covid-19 are more infectious that the vaccinated; or

(3) In their interaction with others, unvaccinated persons are in some way more social, promiscuous or more careless of the risk of infection than the vaccinated. 

Proposition (1) we know to be false. The weekly Covid Surveillance Reports compiled by the UK Health Security Agency have shown consistently over many months that overall, and  except in the youngest age classes, the vaccinated have a Covid-19 case rate several times that of the unvaccinated (see Table 13 on Page 44). 

Proposition (2) is refuted by the July 30, 2021: Statement by CDC Director, Rochelle P. Walensky, MD

...Delta infection resulted in similarly high SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in vaccinated and unvaccinated people. High viral loads suggest an increased risk of transmission and raised concern that, unlike with other variants, vaccinated people infected with Delta can transmit the virus. ...

Which is to say, vaccinated persons can pass Covid-19 just as readily as the unvaccinated.  

Proposition (3) is obviously false. It is the vaccinated who, believing, correctly or otherwise, that they are immune from serious harm from Covid-19, are most likely to eat out, attend a party at No. 10 Downing St. during a national lockdown, or whatever, whereas the unvaccinated, knowing themselves to be among the most vulnerable to severe Covid-19 illness, act with greater circumspection. 

So, yes, Fishman et al., from their base at Canada's top research university, have published a nonsense paper that has made a nonsense of the Canadian Medical Association Journal, while showing the Toronto Gobe and Mail to be the publication of elite correct thought that we have always supposed it to be. 

But why this particular lie? 

Let the reader decide. But one thing's for sure, that headline in the Globule sure helps cover wannabe dictator, Justin Trudeau's arse over his irrational and tyrannical vaccine mandates and his Hitlerian diatribe of hate directed at Freedom Rally supporters. 

Related:


But they're 79.2% vaxxed! It must be those vax-deniers causing a die-off of the vaxxed.













Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms: Tamara Lich to be awarded the George Jonas Freedom Award

Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms: Trudeau Liberals’ claim that truckers want to ‘overthrow’ government is false and dangerous






Tuesday, April 5, 2022

Trudeau's Covid Big Lie

Justin Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act, an Act of Parliament intended to deal with threats to national security, because a bunch of truckers were illegally parked in Ottawa and elsewhere during a peaceful protest against a Covid vaccine mandate. 

Why are Covid vaccine mandates so important to Trudeau?

Because they provide a justification for a vaccine passport linked with a digital database that can be readily expanded to record any aspect of your life history, and then used to control your life on the basis of that life history. 

So you donated a few dollars in support of the Truckers' Convoy? No Federal Government employment for you. Oh, and for now, you're denied access to your bank account. 

You declined the vax on religious grounds? That won't look good when the School Board considers your application for a teaching position. 

But Canadians are mostly passive in the face of Trudeau's totalitarian program.

Why?

For three reasons:

First, they've been terrorized by media-complicit government propaganda that presented a novel flu-like illness as comparable in virulence to the Black Death, a plague from the East that wiped out a third of Europe's population during the Fourteenth Century. 

Second, they've been persuaded by media-propagated propaganda that the untested novel mRNA vaccine will save us all from a horrible death by Covid. 

Third, they've swallowed the lie that the unvaxxed are a threat to the health and safety of the vaxxed. 

That is Trudeau's big Covid lie, that the unvaxxed threaten the health of the vaxxed. 

On the face of it, the idea that unvaxxed threaten the health of the vaxxed is bizarre, for if the vaxxed are endangered by the disease-spreading unvaxxed, then clearly the vax is not doing what a vaccine is supposed to do, which is provide immunity to infection. So why the fuss to have everyone vaxxed?

And with respect to the threat posed to the vaxxed by the unvaxxed, it has been stated by none other than Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the US National Institute for Allergy and Infections Diseases, that the vaxxed, if infected, carry as high a viral load as unvaxxed people who are infected.

But the vax lessens the severity of Covid illness. Thus, whereas an unvaxxed person who is Covid infected will likely feel sufficiently ill to stay home, a vaxxed person with Covid is more likely to carry on with the normal course of their life, spreading the virus as they go. 

So who is the greatest hazard to whom?

Well, as it happens, the UK Governments Health Security Agency's weekly Covid Surveillance Report provides conclusive evidence on that point. 

Here are the most recent data (for the period March 6 – 27, 2022):

Table 14. Unadjusted rates of COVID-19 infection, hospitalisation and death per 100,000 persons vaccinated or unvaccinated, by age class:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                   Covid Cases/100,000

                  Triple Vaxxed   Unvaxxed                 

 Under 18:        1454            1711

  18 - 29:        3119             942

  30 - 39:        4325            1086

  40 - 49:        3958             955

  50 - 59:        3303             780

  60 - 69:        2815             573

  70 - 79:        2162             532

80 & over:        2024             776

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

So there you have conclusive evidence: except among children, it is not the unvaxxed, but the vaxxed who are most likely to be infected and, therefore, most likely to pass the virus on to you*. 

And if you're not convinced by those numbers, here are data for New Zealand (Source) :

But that the vax increases your risk of Covid is not what every Canadian knows. What Canadians have been repeatedly told by both Provincial authorities and the Government of Canada — from Saint Bonnie Henry of British Columbia to Mother Teresa Tam of Ottawa, plus our genius Prime Minister, Justin Cludeau — is that the unvaxxed are the unclean, a threat to public health. Indeed, they are dangerously deluded crackpots who threaten the welfare of the entire nation. 

Which is a lie. 

It is Trudeau's big lie. 

It's the Trudeau Government's justification for vax mandates and vax passports. 

It's the reason that, for the unvaxed, Canada now bears a resemblance to Stalin's Russia. The unvaxxed, like citizens of the Soviet Union, are legally prohibited from leaving the country, whether by air, rail or sea

Where exactly this is going remains to be seen. But here is former Canadian Foreign Minister, Maxime Bernier, leader of the People's Party of Canada,  on the vaccine passport, the implementation of which is absolutely dependent on Trudeau's big lie: 

But plans by our governments to implement digital IDs are going much further.

Their goal is to create a single, centralized digital identity with which you will be able to access all governments services.

It could also integrate your financial transactions and all sorts of information about your dealings with private institutions and organizations.

That sounds like very convenient. But it means that anyone accessing your identity will know literally everything about you. And could potentially control every aspect of your life.

Plans by central banks in Canada and around the world to develop digital currencies will make financial control even easier."

You don’t want to get your third booster shot? Or you posted something on Facebook that the government considers hateful? One click on a computer by a bureaucrat and you just lost your driving license.

You produced too much greenhouse gas this month according to the government? They will know about it. Forget about refueling your car, your credit card is frozen.

This totalitarian system already exists—in China. It’s called the social credit system.

If you are a “bad” citizen according to the communist regime, you lose social credit points. And when you lose too many, they block you from accessing services. You become a non-citizen.

Of course, proponents of digital IDs are telling us it will protect our privacy and will not be used as a tracking tool. Don’t be fooled.

Governments will implement more controls, little by little, until the system works just like in China.

Trudeau and Freeland already started a few weeks ago when they froze the bank accounts of Canadians who supported the truckers’ convoy.

The absolute fraudulence of Canada's rationale for vaccine passports is provided by news this week from British Columbia, where eighty percent or more of the population is fully vaccinated, yet at least half the population have been infected by the latest Covid variant, Omicron.

So no, the vax does not stop the spread. It is the vaxxed, believing themselves immune, who are most likely to give you a dose of Corona. Trudeau's policy of demonizing the unvaxed and subjecting them to restrictions on their freedom of movement and association proves him to be stupid in the extreme or utterly corrupt. 

It is hard to believe he can be that stupid. He is, after all, able to call on the entire Canadian public service for advice, and the top guys in the Ottawa bureaucracy are not unintelligent people. So the inference is clear: Trudeaus is just another son-of-a-bitch wannabe tyrant.

_______

* The higher infection rate among the vaxxed is not surprising if you think about it. The vaxxed are under the impression that the vax has made them proof against infection, so why not eat out, go to a party, or otherwise socialize freely. The unvaxxed, on the other hand, given the heavy pro-vax propaganda, are mostly more cautious.  

Related: 

Vaccinated Have Up To SIX Times the Infection Rate of Unvaccinated, New Zealand Government Data Show So you can't say the vax is ineffective: It creates the epidemic to justify the vax mandates. 


Covid Vaccines Increase Risk of Heart-Related Deaths by Up to 50%, Lancet Analysis of Trial Data Finds

769 Athletes have Collapsed While Competing Over The Past Year – “Avg. Age of Players Suffering Cardiac Arrest is JUST 23”

BC's Cretinous and Vicious Vax Mandates for Public Servants Even when it became clear that the vax doesn't protect against either infection or disease transmission and may not even reduce disease severity due to Omicron, Saint Bonnie and Strongman Horgan are adamant: Civil servants will be double jabbed or fired. Is that stupidity? Ignorance? Malice? Spite?

German Lawmakers Reject Mandatory Vaccination Bill




US Counties With Highest Vaccination Rates See More COVID-19 Cases Than Least Vaccinated

Numerous Health Problems More Likely Due To COVID-19 Vaccines Than Coincidence: VAERS Data Analysis

“It’s Beyond ANY Shadow of a Doubt That the Vaccines Are Causing LARGE NUMBERS of Deaths”: Dr. Peter McCullough (VIDEO)

Omicron wave exposed, infected 50 per cent of British Columbians: Henry

B.C. lifting vaccine card rules this week, even as rise in cases expected

Trudeau lies to Canada’s face

Unmasking Trudeau’s lies and trucker truths

KINSELLA: Justin Trudeau irredeemably deserving of outrage

John Robson: Justin Trudeau's factory of little lies

Trudeau ‘gaslighting’ Canadian people over protests

Friday, December 10, 2021

Why the Trudeau Liberals and the O'Toole Tories Are Doomed

 Two weeks ago, news came out that a new covid variant originating in South Africa, Omicron, was spreading around the world.

So far, there is no indication it causes more severe disease, the opposite seems to be the case.

Establishment politicians and the media nonetheless jumped on this story to once again fearmonger and extend authoritarian covid measures.

I’m not worried about this new variant!

I’m a lot more concerned about other diseases like cancer or mental issues.

I’m more concerned about vaccine passport and the loss of our freedoms.

I’m more concerned about censorship and the lack of rational scientific debates in our society.

I’m more concerned that the mainstream media have become the propaganda arm of the government.

I’m more concerned about the acceptance of discrimination and segregation in our society.

I’m more concerned that the government of New Brunswick is allowing grocery stores to ban the unvaccinated.

I’m more concerned that people are losing their jobs because of their personal medical choice.

I’m more concerned about governments deficits and inflation.

The LibConNDP coalition unanimously supports covid tyranny.

Nobody else in Ottawa is raising these concerning issues.

Max Bernier
People's Party of Canada

Related:

Did Britain's 'first Omicron death' die FROM the Covid variant or WITH it? They could have been hit by a bus

28X increase in stillbirths in multiple parts of Canada… The bravest politician in Ontario…
Brilliant response to Ontario MPP's question from the Ontario Minister of Health — Complete bullshit assurance, entirely fact free

Another Study Finds That Natural Immunity Protects Better Against Infection Than the Pfizer Vaccine

Tuesday, November 16, 2021

So Why, Again, Is Our Dictator Wannabe Prime Minister Seeking to Compel Universal Vaccination?

MedRXiv: Deaths in Children and Young People in England following SARS-CoV-2 infection during the first pandemic year: a national study using linked mandatory child death reporting data

Twenty-five English children and young people died of SARS-CoV-2 during the year March 1, 2020 to Feb 28, 2021. 

Those deaths equate to a mortality rate of 2 per million among England's 12,023,568 children and young people versus mortality from all causes which is 35 times greater.

Children and young people over the age of 10 years, of Asian and Black ethnic backgrounds, and with comorbidities were over-represented compared to other children.
Based on the analysis of 81 published studies, it was determined that children and young people at greatest vulnerability of severe disease or death from SARS-CoV-2 infection are infants, teenagers, those with cardiac or neurological conditions, or two or more comorbid conditions, and those who are obese. These groups should be considered higher priority for vaccination and for protective shielding when appropriate. But the absolute increase in risk for most comorbidities was small compared to children without underlying conditions.

Conclusion
The very low Covid mortality among children and young people can be further reduced by vaccinating that minority with cardiac or neurological conditions or who are obese. In addition treatment of those who have a symptomatic infection with Pfizer's antiviral pill, a protease inhibitor like Ivermectin--a drug used widely and to good effect to treat Covid infection in India, may be expected to  virtually eliminate mortality among young people and children with SARS-CoV-19 infection . 

Vaccinating all children and young people thus seems unnecessary and unwise, given the evidence of heart damage and even death caused by the vaccine in young people. 

Related: 

Saturday, October 23, 2021

Justin Trudeau's Prison Camp Canada: Why Is Canada's Prime Minister Acting Like a Moronic Arse Hole?

Trudeau: You can’t leave Canada if you’re Unvaccinated….

Trudeau aims to make "vaccination" mandatory by locking down the "unvaccinated" for ever. Prevented not only from leaving the country, but likely eventually locked in their own homes, denied access to the grocery store, schools and workplaces. 

 Why? 

Supposedly because the "unvaccinated" are a risk to the health and safety of the "vaccinated." 

But conclusive evidence refutes the claim. 

1. The "vaccinated" are susceptible to Covid infection. 

2. The "vaccinated" who are infected carry as high a viral load as the "unvaccinated" -- that's a statement from Rochelle Walinsky, Director of the US Center for Disease Control. 

3. "Increases in Covid cases are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States"-- that's the title of a peer-reviewed journal article in the European Journal of Epidemiology.

4. Millions of Canadians have superior immunity to Covid than the "vaccinated" because they've had Covid and thus acquired broad-spectrum Covid immunity, not just a bunch of variant-specific antibodies. Antibodies, that is, that  are of limited effectiveness against new Covid variants and which dissipate rapidly, thus necessitating a further shots within months to maintain whatever feeble Covid protection they are supposed to provide. 

Many so-called "anti-vaxxers" are in fact those who've had Covid and need no fucking jab, Trudeau, you retarded bastard. 

As Yale epidemiologist, Dr. Harvey Risch, explains: It's the "unvaccinated" who need protection from the "vaccinated."

What Canada has is a tyranny run by a self-declared dictatorship wannabe holding power with the support of less than one third of the population. 

Will intelligent, properly informed Canadians remain supine, subordinate, sycophantic, under the heel of this ridiculous prime ministerial jerk? 

We'll soon know, as millions of "unvaccinated" Canadians decide such questions as these:

Will "unvaccinated" students now in Canada but registered for study at a US or other foreign University, withdraw from their course of study?

Will "unvaccinated" Canadian students now abroad, accept that it is right and reasonable that they have been made an exile through the action of their own government.

Will unvaccinated persons whose business or profession requires them to travel abroad, abandon their career?

Let no one doubt, it was in fear of the response to such questions as these that Canada's blackface-loving Mussolini called an election during the Covid pandemic. 

It was to strengthen his hand against what he knew would be a popular backlash, when his stupid tyrannical intentions became known. 

But why Trudeau has so crassly declared the death of Canada as a free country, we have no explanation other than sheer stupidity. But we invite alternative suggestions.

Postscript: 
Does anyone know what would be the Canadian equivalent to "Let's go Brandon"? A lifetime free subscription to this blog for the best suggestion.

Related:

That's not your child to advise, slave. He belongs to the state.

National Post — Raymond de Souza: Overreach on COVID measures about power This is an excellent analysis demonstrating that Canada, a supposed constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy, is governed neither by its constitution nor its parliament. Rather we are ruled by bureaucrats and judges conforming to the dictates of unscrupulous politicians representing a remarkably small proportion of the population.

Sunday, August 22, 2021

Canadian Election: Justin Trudeau Delivers Creepiest Speech of the Week

 Whoever runs the corporate puppet that lives inside Justin Trudeau’s skin has clearly decided it’s time for him to shake his rather inneffectual image and try and become a forceful public speaker. In a “strongman” speech in the run-up to the Canadian elections, Trudeau worked himself into a frenzy on vaccination:

“If you don’t want to get vaccinated, that’s your choice. But don’t think you can get on a plane or a train beside vaccinated people and put them at risk!”

A tip for the future though – if you’re going to have the blandest man in the world try and excite a crowd, give him more than 80 people to work with. That said, however poorly delivered and however lukewarm the reception, the sentiment itself is very unsettling.* Full on segregation in Canada. As someone remarked to us on Telegram, “instead of the back of the bus, it’s now no bus at all.”

Source: Off Guardian

* Another thing that's unsettling is the idea that the unvaxed are a threat to the vaxed. That hardly inspires confidence in the effectiveness of a so-called vaccine that has killed and injured thousands upon thousands of recipients. 

Also unsettling is the failure to acknowledge that there are millions of Canadians, probably more than ten million, who've had a Covid infection, which will have conferred more robust and durable Covid immunity than any of the untested commercial "vaccines" that Trudeau, in full Mussolini mode, is shilling for.

Fortunately, few Canadians respond to rhetorical bullshit the way pre-WW2 Italians did.

Related:


Fox 29: Study suggests lambda variant could evade COVID-19 vaccine protection (but it won't evade resistance of the Covid recovered -- but Trudeau, our low IQ and poorly informed PM, doesn't know that).

Wednesday, March 24, 2021

One Year to Flatten Life as we Knew it

By Rob Slane

The Blogmire Blog, March 22, 2021: It is a year since we embarked on an untried, untested, unscientific, draconian and frankly mad medical, social, economic and psychological experiment on millions of people. On the day we were thrust into this folly I wrote, “So that seems to be that. The end of Britain as we knew it.” All that has taken place since has, I believe, confirmed that, and my only surprise is that millions of people still cling to the bizarre idea that Lockdowns were based on science, that they were necessary, that they have been effective, and that we have a benevolent Government whose aim has been to keep us all safe. None of these things are true.

A Brief Recap of What Has Taken Place

You will search in vain for pre-2020 medical and scientific literature advocating the mass quarantining of healthy people as an appropriate response to a pandemic. In fact, after a panicked Mexican Government flirted with the idea for five whole days during the 2009 Swine Flu outbreak (ending it once it was realised how devastating it would be), the Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO) at the time, Dr Margaret Chan, explicitly warned against such destructive measures being used:

“In this regard, let me make a strong plea to countries to refrain from introducing measures that are economically and socially disruptive, yet have no scientific justification and bring no clear public health benefit.”

So this disruptive, unscientific measure, with no clear public health benefit was quietly buried and forgotten about. Until, that it is, it was implemented in January 2020, in the Chinese province of Hubei, on the orders of Xi Jinping, leader of one of the most totalitarian regimes on the planet, as the lawyer Michael Sanger details in great depth here.

One might have expected the WHO to take the same line as Dr. Chan in 2009, yet by February it had inexplicably changed its pandemic response guidance, on the flimsiest and most unreliable evidence, bringing it into line with the Wuhan decree.

One might then have expected Western countries to reject this tyrannical approach, but shockingly they did not. In Britain, the perfectly sensible Pandemic Preparedness Strategy the Government had had in place since 2011, which stressed the absolute importance of ensuring minimal disruption to society, even during a virus outbreak that might take 315,000 lives in a 15 week period, was binned. Why? That is the single most important question to which we need answers, but I think that Professor Neil Ferguson gave us a big clue in his interview with The Times in December:

“They [the Chinese] claimed to have flattened the curve. I was skeptical at first. I thought it was a massive cover-up by the Chinese. But as the data accrued it became clear it was an effective policy. But it’s a communist one-party state, we said. We couldn’t get away with it in Europe, we thought. And then Italy did it. And we realized we could.”

His claim of flattening the curve is a red-herring. His comment that they realised they could get away with implementing the tactics of a despotic regime is not.

Having been failed by the WHO and the Government, surely the British people would not fall for something so self-evidently absurd as prohibiting millions of perfectly healthy people from coming into contact with other healthy people? Surely the spirit that had made this country one of the freest nations on earth would kick in?

Sadly, and bafflingly, no. The British people, through a combination of being bombarded with fear, hysteria and outright lies on an unprecedented scale, meekly submitted to these despotic decrees, believing them to be something to do with being kept safe.


The Lie of Asymptomatic Transmission and the Myth of Half a Million Deaths

The biggest lie by far is that of asymptomatic transmission. Indeed, it may one day become known as the biggest lie, told to the largest number of people, in the shortest space of time. The claim was based chiefly on an incident in Germany, where a Chinese lady, who was thought to have been asymptomatic, was said to have spread the illness. However, it subsequently turned out that she did in fact have symptoms, but had suppressed them with medication. Yet that was scarcely reported on, and by that time the myth that this was some kind of new, mystical disease that could be spread by people with no symptoms had been born, and with it the basis for the Lockdowns, masks, and the myriad of other bizarre, dystopian restrictions placed upon us. Later in the year, a huge study of 10 million people in Wuhan showed zero cases of asymptomatic spread, but as you can probably guess this was entirely ignored by Governments and media around the world.

What of Professor Ferguson’s claim of 510,000 deaths? This remains the basis for the claim of Lockdown supporters that there would have been hundreds of thousands more deaths had we not locked down. Apart from the fact that the UK is currently fifth on the worldwide deaths per million table having had the third most stringent Lockdown on planet earth, according to the University of Oxford, and that countries who did not lock down have fared no worse, is there anything else that we can point to, to show the fallacy of Professor Ferguson’s doomsday prophecy?

Why yes there is, and it is in fact contained within Professor Ferguson’s report itself. He arrived at his figure of 510,000 dead for a “no-restrictions” scenario by estimating that 81% of the population would become infected, and by assuming an Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) of Covid-19 at 0.9%. However, in October, arguably the world’s foremost epidemiologist, John Ioannidis, of Stanford University, California, published a definitive study into the IFR of Covid-19. He calculated that the median rate was 0.23%, not 0.9%, as Ferguson had assumed, and his work was accepted and approved by the WHO.

This is very important: If Ferguson had used the IFR number of 0.23%, rather than 0.9%, guess what number of deaths he would have arrived at? The answer is around 127,000. Which is mighty interesting, since the total number of “official” deaths from Covid-19, at the time of writing, is 126,172. In other words, if Ferguson had used the correct IFR, the number of deaths he would have predicted in a scenario with no Lockdown would have been the same number of official deaths that we’ve actually had with the 3rd most stringent Lockdown on earth. Of course, I’m well aware that those 126,000 or so deaths were not all from Covid-19, but Lockdown supporters claim they were and so it’s for them to explain how this number is currently the same as Ferguson’s study would have predicted for a non-Lockdown situation, had he used the correct IFR.

That Lockdowns have not saved lives ought to be obvious. The virus was known since early March 2020 to overwhelmingly kill the elderly with comorbidities, and so resources could and should have been targeted to protect such people. Yet the scattergun approach that was taken of quarantining everyone is not — by definition — a targeted approach. And so the irony is that with all the absurd calls for healthy people to change their whole way of life to protect the vulnerable, what actually happened is the healthy had their lives utterly overturned, and the vulnerable were left to die.


The Destructive Power of Lockdowns

So much for the futility of Lockdowns to do good, what about their destructive power? This cannot be overstated. They are destroying lives. They are destroying livelihoods. They are destroying jobs. They are destroying businesses. They are destroying education. They are destroying churches. They are destroying trust. They are destroying mental health. They are destroying marriages. They are destroying relationships. They are destroying communities. They are destroying the idea that the police serve the people. They are destroying the rule of law. They are destroying free Britain.

Time and space will not suffice to tell of the destruction to the delicate balances of life in the medical sphere (especially weakened immune systems), the social sphere, the psychological sphere and the economic sphere, or the slide to a Transhumanist future brought about by the incessant calls for humans to stay away from other humans, and the bizarre ritual of covering the human face — the most immediate and important physical manifestation of the Imago Dei — with useless bits of cloth.

To those who have acquiesced in this, I would just ask this: Do you still not see what you have done? Do you still not see what it is you have supported?

The Britain that existed prior to March 2020, or which many of us thought existed, is gone. The Britain, in which we took freedom for granted, is gone. We have entered a very different future, and what is more, the vast majority of people seem to have welcomed it. Worse than this, we are being ushered into a Transhumanist Technocracy, where we are not seen as human, made in the image of God, but merely as potential virus carriers, digital ID numbers, drones fit to be tracked and traced, fit to be watched and ordered about by the dystopian technocrats who are building their Medical Despotism around us, but not considered worthy to live quiet and peaceful lives, going about our lawful business, living life without interfering overlords meddling in every aspect of it.


Why has this happened?

For the first few months I hedged my bets between the idea that the continuance of these measures was down to politicians trying to cover up for a monumental blunder, or that it was part of something far more nefarious. And whilst I am still unclear on the origins, for me the “covering up for a big mistake” possibility became untenable in October, with the release of The Great Barrington Declaration. This was a scientifically sound, medically robust, intellectually credible way out of the crisis that had been created. It was an open door for the British Government, along with others around the world, to walk through and save face. But what actually happened is they either ignored it or, in the case of Comrade Hancock, actively ridiculed it.

I think it obvious by now that there is something far more nefarious going on. But how to explain it? Some imagine that this must require some Dr Evil character, pulling the strings and making his puppets all dance to the same tune. I don’t believe this to be so. Anyone who has even the most cursory knowledge of politics over the past two decades must have noticed that almost all the people who rise to the top have broadly the same ideology. They think the same things. They mouth the same platitudes. They walk the same walk. And if you don’t think, speak or walk like them, why you’ll never be invited to the party. It is fairly obvious that many of these people have seen Covid-19 as an opportunity to increase their power, to control people, and to remake society in their own hideous image.

But that’s not all. I have seen endless disquieting comments – echoing my own thoughts – from both Christians and non-Christians, that the inexplicably bizarre reaction to what happened was as if millions of people have been put under some kind of spell. On this, it would be well to remember that there are things that go on which are well beyond our ability to explain by purely human reason and human actions:

“For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places” (Ephesians 6:1).

Looking to the Future

Having been lulled and propagandised into the acceptance of measures that are not only futile in and of themselves, but which have destroyed the idea of what we might call normal life, millions have now been lulled into the idea that rushed, untried, untested “vaccines”, which are not due to finish their clinical trials until 2023 (see links to PfizerAstraZeneca and Moderna trials), are some sort of salvation and way back to normal. But as the news in recent days has shown, they are in for a big disappointment. Your overlords do not want to let you return to normal. They have the bit between their teeth, and I don’t think they are about to let this opportunity go.

What we are seeing is far bigger, far more comprehensive, far more awful than most of us can comprehend. As Naomi Wolf summed up in a fantastic commentary on the situation recently:

“But this time we do not just face a war on freedom. This time we face a war on human beings, and on all that makes us human.”

Indeed. From Lockdowns to social distancing to masks, humanity and what it means to be human is under attack. There is but one peaceful way out of this Transhumanist Technocratic future: individuals, churches and nations need to repent before God, and having repented they need to plead with Him for deliverance from this judgement, and that he will re-establish truth, reality, and what it actually means to be human, in a world that has forgotten these things. The hour is late. The need really is urgent.


Related: 

Victor Davis Hanson: Follow The ‘Science,’ They Said