Justin Trudeau's Prison Camp Canada: Why Is Canada's Prime Minister Acting Like a Moronic Arse Hole?

Trudeau: You can’t leave Canada if you’re Unvaccinated….

Trudeau aims to make "vaccination" mandatory by locking down the "unvaccinated" for ever. Prevented not only from leaving the country, but likely eventually locked in their own homes, denied access to the grocery store, schools and workplaces. 

 Why? 

Supposedly because the "unvaccinated" are a risk to the health and safety of the "vaccinated." 

But conclusive evidence refutes the claim. 

1. The "vaccinated" are susceptible to Covid infection. 

2. The "vaccinated" who are infected carry as high a viral load as the "unvaccinated" -- that's a statement from Rochelle Walinsky, Director of the US Center for Disease Control. 

3. "Increases in Covid cases are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States"-- that's the title of a peer-reviewed journal article in the European Journal of Epidemiology.

4. Millions of Canadians have superior immunity to Covid than the "vaccinated" because they've had Covid and thus acquired broad-spectrum Covid immunity, not just a bunch of variant-specific antibodies. Antibodies, that is, that  are of limited effectiveness against new Covid variants and which dissipate rapidly, thus necessitating a further shots within months to maintain whatever feeble Covid protection they are supposed to provide. 

Many so-called "anti-vaxxers" are in fact those who've had Covid and need no fucking jab, Trudeau, you retarded bastard. 

As Yale epidemiologist, Dr. Harvey Risch, explains: It's the "unvaccinated" who need protection from the "vaccinated."

What Canada has is a tyranny run by a self-declared dictatorship wannabe holding power with the support of less than one third of the population. 

Will intelligent, properly informed Canadians remain supine, subordinate, sycophantic, under the heel of this ridiculous prime ministerial jerk? 

We'll soon know, as millions of "unvaccinated" Canadians decide such questions as these:

Will "unvaccinated" students now in Canada but registered for study at a US or other foreign University, withdraw from their course of study?

Will "unvaccinated" Canadian students now abroad, accept that it is right and reasonable that they have been made an exile through the action of their own government.

Will unvaccinated persons whose business or profession requires them to travel abroad, abandon their career?

Let no one doubt, it was in fear of the response to such questions as these that Canada's blackface-loving Mussolini called an election during the Covid pandemic. 

It was to strengthen his hand against what he knew would be a popular backlash, when his stupid tyrannical intentions became known. 

But why Trudeau has so crassly declared the death of Canada as a free country, we have no explanation other than sheer stupidity. But we invite alternative suggestions.

Postscript: 

Does anyone know what would be the Canadian equivalent to "Let's go Brandon"? A lifetime free subscription to this blog for the best suggestion.

Related:

National Post — Chris Selley: There seems to be a sick thrill in firing the unvaccinated

National Post — Ottawa mother banned from giving teenage son COVID vaccine advice 

That's not your child to advise, slave. He belongs to the state.

National Post — Raymond de Souza: Overreach on COVID measures about power This is an excellent analysis demonstrating that Canada, a supposed constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy, is governed neither by its constitution nor its parliament. Rather we are ruled by bureaucrats and judges conforming to the dictates of unscrupulous politicians representing a remarkably small proportion of the population.

the Corona Virus Response: A Media Induced Panic For What Reason?

Here's a comment from an actual expert on viral respiratory diseases:

Dr. John Oxford, virologist, Professor at Queen Mary College, University of London, and a leading expert on influenza, including bird flu and the 1918 Spanish Influenza, and HIV/AIDS.

What he says:

Personally, I would say the best advice is to spend less time watching TV news which is sensational and not very good. Personally, I view this Covid outbreak as akin to a bad winter influenza epidemic. In this case we have had 8000 deaths this last year in the ‘at risk’ groups viz over 65% people with heart disease etc. I do not feel this current Covid will exceed this number. We are suffering from a media epidemic! Source

So why the continued lock-down?

Many unofficial reports are now emerging that reveal Covid19 infection rates in the general population that are huge multiples of officially reported rates.

 That means that infection rates in many communities are pretty certainly past the point necessary to achieve herd immunity, which is to say the point at which the disease spreads with ever increasing difficulty before dying out entirely.

Yet no government has reported a survey of the general public to determine whether herd immunity has been achieved.

Why not?

Presumably, because governments do not want the public to know.

And that presumably, is because governments want the lock-downs to continue for reasons quite other than those stated.

What are those ulterior and unstated motives?

Interesting question that:

To drive up unemployment while destroying small businesses that are the chief employers of low-wage labor?

Why would governments want this?

Many reasons come to mind. Here are a couple:

1. By creating a much larger pool of the unemployed, a desperate and docile pool of cheap labor is made available to the corporate giants that own the government.

2. While thousands upon thousands of small business that have been forcibly closed -- shops, restaurants, a multiplicity of service enterprises -- the big boys, Amazon, Star Bucks, Tim Hortons, Crispy Kreme will have been planning how to take over the space newly created for their own expansion.

3. Or is the objective simply to create widespread poverty on a permanent basis?

Is it the idea that living standards for the majority having been crushed, they are to remain crushed?

What, after all, is the point of so many people stuffing their faces with junk food, pissing away energy and other resources on  hedonistic cruise vacations, trips to Vegas and stuffing themselves with toxic, obesity- and diabetes-inducing  grease- and sugar- loaded junk food.

Welcome to the new peonage.

Other possibilities? Suggestions welcome!

And here's one obvious alternative: a Deep State plot to get rid of Trump.

Related:
LA Times: Hundreds of thousands in L.A. County may have been infected with coronavirus
Perspective on the Pandemic: Interview with Prof. John Ioannides

Thierry Meyssan: Covid-19: Neil Ferguson, the Liberal Lyssenko
Ron Paul: What If The Lockdown Was A Giant Mistake?
Jim Fedako: Exactly How Many Deaths To Justify Giving Government's Control Of Everything?
ZH: Why The Shutdown Must End

Understanding the Reproduction Number, Lock-downs and Herd Immunity

During a disease epidemic, lock-downs cut the reproduction number -- that is the number of people infected by each infected person -- by reducing opportunities for viral spread. This can be seen in the Canadian data, which show that the number of newly reported cases turned down within two week of the onset of a national lock-down (see figure 2). As the incubation period for the disease is approximately two weeks, that indicates that the lock-down had a more or less immediate effect in reducing the spread of the virus.

Figure 2. New reported COVID-19 cases (n=5,590

Footnote1) in Canada by episode dateFootnote2 as of April 1, 2020, 11 am EDT

When R0 is less than one, the epidemic dies down and is ultimately extinguished. Problem is, if R0 is driven down by means of a lock-down, any remaining cases or new cases from whatever source are likely to re-ignite the epidemic when the lock-down ends. That is the danger China now faces. China is dealing with this risk by testing people entering the country so that imported cases can be quarantined, and so that contacts of new cases of any source, can be tracked down and quarantined.

In time, if the proportion of the population that has been infected rises high enough, R0 will fall below 1 without a lock-down because most people are immune and cannot therefore be (re-)infected. That is why, in Britain, epidemiologists are now conducting surveys to determine how many people have already acquired immunity. If the proportion is high enough, probably over 60%, herd immunity will have been achieved. That means that even without control over human interactions, R0 will be less than 1 and the virus will be unable to spread. At that point, any new outbreak will die out spontaneously and the national lock-down can be ended.

A further consequence of making a reliable estimate of the population-wide infection rate is that it will provide a basis for an accurate estimate of the mortality rate for the disease. At present, mortality rate estimates are hopelessly skewed because the infection rate includes only those with disease symptoms who are known to medical authorities. Those who suffer the illness without reporting to a doctor, or who are infected without experiencing disease symptoms, are currently excluded from mortality rate estimates, thus elevating the apparent death rate, probably many times in excess of the actual rate.

Related:
James Corbett: The Things You CANNOT Say About Coronavirus
Spectator USA: No lockdown, please, we’re Swedish
Guido Fawkes: China Faking Corona Virus Stats?