Prof Michel Chossudovsky: The Covid Pandemic — A Diabolical Plan to Destroy Lives, Destabilize the Global Economy, and Transfer Wealth to the Already Obscenely Rich
The video will last a half hour and is well worth the time it takes to listen to it, though I don't think it will convince people who think the lockdowns and the new normal are a genuine response to a plague.
The valuable part of the presentation is the focus on the timeline in the first three months of 2020. I did not know that a Davos conference was held in the last week of January. I think that is when preparations for the operations were finalized. Other conspiracy theorists point to a simulated pandemic exercise in late 2019, which seems to have been a rehearsal. UN agencies coordinated the response, which why it was imposed so uniformly in March and April. Lukashenko of Belarus has stated that the IMF tried to bribe him into imposing a lockdown.
One thing I still haven't figured out is why the lockdown started to be relaxed in May 2020, and unlike the imposition of the lockdown, this was not done uniformly. Just in the last week, some states in the USA further relaxed restrictions, while some European countries greatly tightened them. Honestly, in April 2019 I thought they would just roll right into whatever totalitarian order was planned, when everyone was effectively under house arrest and couldn't resist. Also, I don't believe that this was to cover for some sort of financial manipulation or crisis, because if that had been the case the lockdowns would have been the two week thing that normies thought at the time would happen (same with the weird theory that it was done to upgrade communications infrastructure).
My suspicion has been that there was a long standing plan by the world elites to take down the liberal facade of globalization and go to open, forced based, totalitarianism. The excuse wasn't necessarily going to have been a pandemic, maybe it was going to be war instead, and I think sometime next year the pandemic excuse will be quietly dropped. The timing could have been dictated by the start of methane being released in the Artic in 2018, and the end of the viability of fracking, meaning there is not much time until the global economy collapses anyway. The fact that other than in the United States (and we see how American elections can be managed), 2020 was in the middle of a quiet period for elections in developed countries also affected the timing.
In the first three sentences of his Wikipedia entry, Chossudovsky is described as a conspiracy theorist, a publisher of conspiracy theories, or a promoter of 911 conspiracy theories. The CBC, citing the US State Department -- thereby to avoid a charge of libel, brands Chossudovsky a Russian disinformation agent.
Someone so described by among the most preeminent propagators of bullshit certainly deserves a hearing.
But what is puzzling about the gatekeepers' reaction to Chossudovsky is that Communism, which Chossudovsky espouses, is essentially the objective of the elite that Chossudovsky condemns, i.e., a social system characterized by an all powerful elite and a terrorized and subservient mass. So what is the argument about? Why is Chossudovsky fighting the trend? Is it merely that the elites under the intended New World Order will not be the Commie intellectuals like Chossudovsky, but members of the already existent plutocratic elite?
In other words, are we headed for Communism but without the revolution and the mass execution of those without callused hands and bitter hearts?
Or to put that another way, are we seeing a pre-emptive fascist takeover to forestall the Communists?
Also of note on this topic is that Judicial Watch obtained 302 pages of Fauci emails from last year via a Freedom of Information request, which AIER published here: https://www.aier.org/article/chinas-role-in-global-lockdowns-the-smoking-gun/.
I won't be able to go through 302 pages of emails quickly, but they should reveal more about what the elites were thinking last year.
The video will last a half hour and is well worth the time it takes to listen to it, though I don't think it will convince people who think the lockdowns and the new normal are a genuine response to a plague.
ReplyDeleteThe valuable part of the presentation is the focus on the timeline in the first three months of 2020. I did not know that a Davos conference was held in the last week of January. I think that is when preparations for the operations were finalized. Other conspiracy theorists point to a simulated pandemic exercise in late 2019, which seems to have been a rehearsal. UN agencies coordinated the response, which why it was imposed so uniformly in March and April. Lukashenko of Belarus has stated that the IMF tried to bribe him into imposing a lockdown.
One thing I still haven't figured out is why the lockdown started to be relaxed in May 2020, and unlike the imposition of the lockdown, this was not done uniformly. Just in the last week, some states in the USA further relaxed restrictions, while some European countries greatly tightened them. Honestly, in April 2019 I thought they would just roll right into whatever totalitarian order was planned, when everyone was effectively under house arrest and couldn't resist. Also, I don't believe that this was to cover for some sort of financial manipulation or crisis, because if that had been the case the lockdowns would have been the two week thing that normies thought at the time would happen (same with the weird theory that it was done to upgrade communications infrastructure).
My suspicion has been that there was a long standing plan by the world elites to take down the liberal facade of globalization and go to open, forced based, totalitarianism. The excuse wasn't necessarily going to have been a pandemic, maybe it was going to be war instead, and I think sometime next year the pandemic excuse will be quietly dropped. The timing could have been dictated by the start of methane being released in the Artic in 2018, and the end of the viability of fracking, meaning there is not much time until the global economy collapses anyway. The fact that other than in the United States (and we see how American elections can be managed), 2020 was in the middle of a quiet period for elections in developed countries also affected the timing.
In the first three sentences of his Wikipedia entry, Chossudovsky is described as a conspiracy theorist, a publisher of conspiracy theories, or a promoter of 911 conspiracy theories. The CBC, citing the US State Department -- thereby to avoid a charge of libel, brands Chossudovsky a Russian disinformation agent.
DeleteSomeone so described by among the most preeminent propagators of bullshit certainly deserves a hearing.
But what is puzzling about the gatekeepers' reaction to Chossudovsky is that Communism, which Chossudovsky espouses, is essentially the objective of the elite that Chossudovsky condemns, i.e., a social system characterized by an all powerful elite and a terrorized and subservient mass. So what is the argument about? Why is Chossudovsky fighting the trend? Is it merely that the elites under the intended New World Order will not be the Commie intellectuals like Chossudovsky, but members of the already existent plutocratic elite?
In other words, are we headed for Communism but without the revolution and the mass execution of those without callused hands and bitter hearts?
Or to put that another way, are we seeing a pre-emptive fascist takeover to forestall the Communists?
Also of note on this topic is that Judicial Watch obtained 302 pages of Fauci emails from last year via a Freedom of Information request, which AIER published here: https://www.aier.org/article/chinas-role-in-global-lockdowns-the-smoking-gun/.
ReplyDeleteI won't be able to go through 302 pages of emails quickly, but they should reveal more about what the elites were thinking last year.