There is no scientific basis for the measures in place to deal with the alleged Covid Pandemic. Among experts, support for these measures is largely limited to those with financial links with pharmaceutical corporations. Public health bureaucrats, such as Fauci at NIH, are also linked with pharmaceutical corporations. Medical practitioners take their guidance from approved authority, which means NIH, CDC, WHO, all compromised with conflicts of interest. Conforming with these compromised institutions provides liability protection that relying on independent expert advice does not.
One thousand five hundred experts from around the world have come together to challenge the Covid measures as “a global scientific fraud of unprecedented proportions.” Here is their statement.
Is it safe to assume that compromised public health bureaucracies with links to pharmaceutical corporations know more and are more trustworthy than independent experts?
What is the real agenda behind the Covid Deception? Clearly it is not public health.
How was media orchestrated to deplatform and censor experts who challenge the obviously unsuccessful Covid measures? It should make you instantly suspicious when scientifically ignorant and totally compromised presstitutes dismiss dissenting independent experts as “conspiracy theorists.”
Why is no public discussion of the situation possible? If the Covid measures could stand examination, there would be no censorship.
Clearly, an undeclared agenda is being shoved down our throats.
In this article Dr. Pascal Sacre explains why the PCR test results in a huge exaggeration in the number of Covid infections and thus serves the assertion of a pandemic and the creation of fear that causes people to accept tyrannical measures.
That independent scientific experts have been forced out of public discussion should tell you how utterly corrupt are the governments of the world.
Related:
The Covid Pandemic Is The Result of Public Health Authorities Blocking Effective Treatment
Coronapocalypse; Big Pharma's Doomsday Vaccine #666
While you highlighted the drop in life expectancy in the USA in the last year, the fact is that if you look at the total deaths for 2020 in the USA and other countries like Canada, it is not far out of line with previous years at all. In fact the nursing homes/ respirator deaths explain the entire increase. I have not reconciled this with the reports of the life expectancy drop, but I think at least in the USA life expectancy has droppped in other years recently, blamed on opoids and obesity related illnesses. I do know that suicides went up last year.
ReplyDeleteWhat has happened is a big drop in deaths from causes other than COVID-19, including the flu, which equals the number of deaths attributable to COVID. Given that the virus was never isolated, I think its pretty clear that deaths that normally occurred due to the flu and other illnesses were re-labled as COVID deaths, with the nursing home operation used to spike the death toll in the Spring of 2020.
And yes, this was intentional, though the problem is figuring out what the ultimate goal was. My guess is that it was a program, done world wide but mainly targeted at wealth western nations, and the most urbanized parts of wealthy western nations, to get people used to living under totalitarian controls.
The drop in life expectancy data was used by the Associated Press article mainly about the severity of the pandemic in terms of an observed death rate over expected death rate of 135%.
DeleteThis is the death rate from all causes over expected death rate from all causes, and thus leaves open the possibility this 35% over expected is due to many other causes other than COVID-19.
What I would like to know is how 35% over expected can be reconciled with,
"the fact is that if you look at the total deaths for 2020 in the USA and other countries like Canada, it is not far out of line with previous years at all."
It can't be because, prior to the outbreak, the CDC predicted 35% fewer deaths for 2020, can it? No way.
I've wrestled with discrepancies in accounts and data and my own incomplete knowledge and understanding since the beginning of this cataclysmic mess. The situation is not clarifying now, as we, supposedly, "learn more about the disease." This in itself is something I cannot fathom...
...Something is rotten in Denmark...
...or else in the course of this year I've destroyed more brain cells than in all previous adult years combined.
The Associated Press article was illustrated with the photo of a refrigerated tractor trailer supposedly filled with the huge overflow of corona virus corpses.
OK, they're refrigerated, so there's nothing rotten there.
If you have a final and official total death count (total mortality) for 2020, please show it to me. I am worried you're working from a preliminary count which will be revised upwards later as more data comes in. In other words, not a final count. (I made the same mistake earlier in 2020.)
I've got this for you:
2015 2.712 official deaths (in millions)
2016 2.744
2017 2.813
2018 2.839
2019 2.900
The average for these five years is 2.802.
Provisional total excess deaths 2/1/2020 to 2/6/2021:
536,566
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/covid19/mortality-overview.htm
Adding 0.536 to 2.802 = 3.338.
3.338/2.802 = approx 119%.
I expected to see something closer to 135%, but I knew the work was crude and I am making haste because I have other things pressing.
Perhaps someone out there can pick up my train of thought and criticize or supplement.
I think, Unknown, your analysis makes good sense.
DeleteAs for the object of the exercise, if that is what it is, my first thought was simply demographic remediation, i.e., getting rid of the large and very expensive population of elderly people who must be carried by the productive work force.
But that idea fails to account for the deliberate wrecking of Western economies. As a result I have come around to the idea that a great reset is indeed being put into effect.
This may include euthanasia of the elderly but it aims for much more.
In particular, what's happened seems in line with the thinking of Prince Charles and Klaus Schwabb both enthusiastic about the "unique and fast closing window of opportunity that Covid provides to set ourselves (i.e., you peasants) on a new and more sustainable course (i.e., lower standard of living), while at the same you learn to touch your cap to your betters or face very rough consequences.
"The drop in life expectancy data was used by the Associated Press article mainly about the severity of the pandemic in terms of an observed death rate over expected death rate of 135%."
DeleteA 35% rise in deaths would total over 20 million worldwide, which seems disconnected with reports of worldwide Covid mortality that total 2.45 million, so Google tells me.
Maybe the 35% excess deaths estimate is nonsense. Do you know where the number comes from?
In support of the PCR article and my earlier comment:
ReplyDeletehttps://gab.com/Ruth-Plant/posts/105730290598245938
"I have a PhD in virology and immunology. I’m a clinical lab scientist and have tested 1500 “supposed” positive Covid 19 samples collected here in S.
California. When my lab team and I did the testing through Koch’s postulates
and observation under a SEM (scanning electron microscope), we found NO Covid in any of the 1500 samples.
"What we found was that all of the 1500 samples were mostly Influenza A and some were influenza B, but not a single case of Covid, and we did not use the B.S. PCR test. We then sent the remainder of the samples to Stanford, Cornell, and a few of the University of California labs and they found the same results as we did, NO COVID. They found influenza A and B. All of us then spoke to the CDC and asked for viable samples of COVID, which CDC said they could not provide as they did not have any samples. We have now come to the firm conclusion through all our research and lab work, that the COVID 19 was imaginary and fictitious."
As a note of caution, this is posted by someone named Ruth Plant. I found her linked in page (she is from Brantford, Ontario), and there is no indication there that she is a physicist or that she know what she is talking about. I'm posting it anyway because I have seen claims elsewhere to the effect that the underlying virus has not been isolated, and health data as I noted happens to track with it being the rebranded flu.
Apparently she is re-posting from someone else who is also re-posting from someone else, and so on, and no one has found the original account or people are saying its been debunked. I'm leaving it up since it dovetails with the drop in the flu cases matching the rise in COVID cases, and I've seen enough similar accounts elsewhere to indicate there is something here.
DeleteThere are alot of commentators who are on the lockdown skeptic side who have become invested in the "this was made in a lab" narrative, for various reasons. The flu virus mutates every year, so there is no reason to believe this was made in the lab. And yes, the flu can hit you hard and cause you to lose smell and taste.
The original post for the claim got tracked down by a commentator on another blog. Its from Derek Knauss, posting on January 9th, 2021 on Michael Choussedvesky's site globalresearch.ca. Derek Knauss the physicist has no internet presence.
DeleteI think the quoted post by Ruth Plant is rubbish. For instance, the statement:
Delete"When my lab team and I did the testing through Koch’s postulates"
This makes absolutely no sense. Koch's postulates state the conditions that must be met to prove that a particular bacterium causes a particular disease -- they have nothing whatsoever to do with testing for the existence of a virus.
There seems no reason to doubt that Covid-19 exists. Here's probably the earliest report of the isolation and genetic characterization of the virus. The virus was cultured on human cells, and intact virus particles were examined by transmission electron micrography (see Figure 3).
Paul Craig Roberts fell out of favor with me earlier in the pandemic when he said a bunch of questionable things based on what his friend a virologist had told him.(You picked a bone with him back then, didn't you, CS?) He seems to have changed his mind considerably since then, but the earlier gullibility makes his credibility seem weak.
ReplyDeleteYes, I agree: PCR has said some crazy things that raise questions about his judgement or integrity. But in this instance, I thought his comment made sense, blowing up the MSM/Official Western Government Covid-19 story in short and pithy way.
Delete