Thursday, June 2, 2022
FLASHBACK 2014 - US is militarizing Ukraine to invade Russia. Sergei Glazyev
Wednesday, June 1, 2022
Monday, May 30, 2022
Klaus Schwabb's Big Question: What To Do With All of These Useless People (Yes, He's Referring to You)?
Harari is the prophet of the billionaires. Ordinary folk, those who do not minister to the needs of the very rich, Harari calls "the useless people."
In this video, you can hear Harari express what Klaus Schwabb, whose organization seeks to bring into being a new world order, considers to be Harari's great “Pearls of Wisdom”. Afterwards, you might consider whether those such as Justin Trudeau, Volodymyr Zelensky, Joe Biden, and so many others of the rich and powerful who stand behind the World Economic Forum of which Schwabb is the public face, should be indicted before an international court for a conspiracy against the mass of mankind.
Sunday, May 29, 2022
Goodbye Ukraine. Welcome back Greater Poland and Imperial Russia
Was the ongoing war in Ukraine started for the purpose of redrawing the map of Eastern Europe?
In particular, was the objective to restore the frontier between Poland and Russia along the Dneiper River, where it was agreed in 1665 by the Treaty of Andrusovo, an agreement made "permanent" in 1686 by Russia's payment to Poland of 146,000 Rubles. (The ruble was worth more then than now -- about 5000 times more.) Under the terms of that treaty, Russia acquired Polish land to the right of the river, while Poland retained the left bank.
If that is the objective, what is the motivation?
For Russia, the benefit is obvious: the recovery of at least the Eastern half of the former Imperial domain of Little Russia.
For Poland, likewise, the benefit is the recovery of former imperial lands.
But why would Ukraine facilitate its own extinction?
For several reasons.
First, to be rid of those damn Russian cockroaches, to use the terminology of the Ukrainian nationalists.
Better to lose the Eastern territories than tolerate continued cohabitation with people who speak a foreign language, perpetuate a foreign culture, and have allegiance to the super power next door.
Second, to be rid of those damn Nazified nationalists, who not only hate Russians but also Jews, a highly influenctial element of Western Ukrainian society, with over one hundred thousand members in Kyiv alone.
Third, to enter immediately into the European Union and NATO, thereby gaining the prospect of rapid economic development plus increased security from further Russian encroachment.
How did Ukraine hope to achieve these objectives?
Easy.
First, send the Nazis to exterminate ethnic Russians in Eastern Ukraine.
Second, fail to prevent the Nazis from being killed or taken captive by invading forces of the Russian Federation sent to protect their Ukrainian co-ethnics.
Third, refuse a negotiated settlement with Russia, thus ensuring Russian annexation of East Ukrainian.
Fourth, make Poland an offer of union it cannot refuse, meaning the return to Poland of former Polish territory, including the Polish city of Lvov.
Result: Ukraine will be no more, and everyone but the Nazis and the many thousands of victims of war will be happy.
Related:
Ukraine Bits: Russian Artillery - Counter Attacks - New Missile Systems
Ukraine Army COLLAPSING; Zelensky (Now) Saying "Must Face Reality . . ."
Friday, May 27, 2022
Volodymr Zelinksy, the Man who Murdered the Ukraine
Zelinsky sent the Ukrainian Army, including the Nazi Azov battalion, to Eastern Ukraine to subjugate the rebel Donbas republics and to murder the Russian "cockroach" defenders. In response, Putin sent the Russian army to The Ukraine, not evidently, to pursue a lightning war of conquest, but to engage in a slow grinding down of the Ukrainian army, and the gradual occupation of Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizkia and Kherson. In the process, many of Ukraine's Nazi warriors must have died, while many more, more than 2500 according to this Russian source, have become prisoners of war following the surrender of the Nazis holed up in the Azovstal bastion.
How much further Russia will advance, and for how long Russia intends to hold the territory it has conquered, remains to be seen. It is likely, however, that Russia will hold indefinitely all occupied territory East of the Dneiper River, territory, that is, which Russia won, previously, in the Russo-Polish war that ended with the Treaty of Andrusovo in 1667. Under the terms of that treaty -- signed more than one hundred years before the founding of the United States of America -- Russia gained title to all of what is now the Ukraine on the right bank of the river.
In addition, however, Russia will likely cross the river and occupy the rest of Ukraine's Black Sea coast, including the city of Odessa, which was founded in 1794 as a Russian naval fortress on territory annexed from Turkey in 1792.
Meantime, Zelinsky has agreed to what is atantamount to a merger of Ukraine -- that part of it which the government in Kyiv still controls -- with Poland. Under the terms of this remarkable agreement, Polish citizens will be free both to stand for election to the Ukrainian Parliament, and to serve as judges in Ukrainian courts.
Thus, entirely through his own actions, Zelinksy has effectively abolished The Ukraine: the East and likely also the South going to Russia, the West going to Poland. In this way, Poland regains the lands, including the Polish City of Lvov, annexed to The Ukraine by Stalin following World War II. At the same time, Ukrainians will presumably be free to migrate into Poland. For Ukrainian Jews, this freedom is of immense significance, since it allows them to restore the a Jewish population to what, before the Nazi genocide, had long been the home of the majority of Europe's Jews.
Related:
When Will Canada's Low IQ Government Understand that Covid Vaccination Does Not Stop the Spread and End Its Vax Passport Tyranny
When Cornell University in the U.S. reopened to in-person tuition in August 2021, it had in place an extensive testing, contact tracing and quarantine programme in conjunction with the local health department. Vaccination was mandated for all students and encouraged for employees (students as usual getting a rough deal from their university). Masks were required on campus and isolation orders and contact tracing occurred within hours of any positive result.
The university is therefore an excellent live experiment to see whether vaccination, masks, mass testing and quarantine – tools deployed to contain Covid outbreaks the world over – could succeed.
The findings – published in the Journal of the American Medical Association – could not be clearer: the measures made no visible impact on the outbreak.
NATO vs Russia: what happens next
Pepe Escobar:
The Cradle, May 24, 2022: Three months after the start of Russia’s Operation Z in Ukraine, the battle of The West (12 percent) against The Rest (88 percent) keeps metastasizing. Yet the narrative – oddly – remains the same.
On Monday, from Davos, World Economic Forum Executive Chairman Klaus Schwab introduced Ukrainian comedian-cum-President Volodymyr Zelensky, on the latest leg of his weapons-solicitation-tour, with a glowing tribute. Herr Schwab stressed that an actor impersonating a president defending neo-Nazis is supported by “all of Europe and the international order.”
He means, of course, everyone except the 88 percent of the planet that subscribes to the Rule of Law – instead of the faux construct the west calls a ‘rules-based international order.’
Back in the real world, Russia, slowly but surely has been rewriting the Art of Hybrid War. Yet within the carnival of NATO psyops, aggressive cognitive infiltration, and stunning media sycophancy, much is being made of the new $40 billion US ‘aid’ package to Ukraine, deemed capable of becoming a game-changer in the war.
This ‘game-changing’ narrative comes courtesy of the same people who burned though trillions of dollars to secure Afghanistan and Iraq. And we saw how that went down.
Ukraine is the Holy Grail of international corruption. That $40 billion can be a game-changer for only two classes of people: First, the US military-industrial complex, and second, a bunch of Ukrainian oligarchs and neo-connish NGOs, that will corner the black market for weapons and humanitarian aid, and then launder the profits in the Cayman Islands.
Related:
As Things Fall Apart Biden May Want To EscalateSunday, May 22, 2022
Monkey Pox: Is This Bill Gates's Next-Time Pandemic?
By Michael Senger
Brownstone Institute, May 20, 2022 Elite media outlets around the world are on red alert over the world’s first-ever global outbreak of Monkeypox in mid-May 2022—just one year after an international biosecurity conference in Munich held a simulation of a “global pandemic involving an unusual strain of Monkeypox” beginning in mid-May 2022.
Monkeypox was first identified in 1958, but there’s never been a global Monkeypox outbreak outside of Africa until now—in the exact week of the exact month predicted by the biosecurity folks in their pandemic simulation. Take these guys to Vegas!
Ed Yong, who’s penned dozens of hysterical articles on Covid for The Atlantic including such gems as COVID-19 Long-Haulers Are Fighting for Their Future, Even Health-Care Workers With Long COVID Are Being Dismissed, How Did This Many Deaths Become Normal? and The Final Pandemic Betrayal, is hot on the scene of the new Monkeypox outbreak.Eric Feigl-Ding is also all over this.
Epidemiologists Jennifer Nuzzo and Bill Hanage are on the scene—but still no word from them as to whether they see anything strange about the first-ever global Monkeypox outbreak occurring in mid-May 2022, a year after they acted as advisers on an international biosecurity simulation of a global Monkeypox outbreak occurring in mid-May 2022.
Read more:
Related:
UK monkeypox cases jump 70% in just three daysGAIN OF FUNCTION ON POX VIRUSES CONFIRMED
ECDC: ‘Monkeypox Outbreak Appears To Have Leaked From Ukraine Lab’
An article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences calls for an independent investigation of information held by U.S.-based institutions that could shed light on the origins of Covid.
Justin Trudeau's Military Trained Zelensky's Nazis
Ottawa Citizen: Canada's Military Trained Ukrainian Nazis
A top Nazi hunter and Holocaust scholar says Canada failed when it allowed Ukrainian military personnel connected to far-right groups to receive training as recently as 17 months ago.
Advertisement 2
Article content
But the Canadian Forces says it had no obligation to be entirely certain of the backgrounds of those soldiers it trained in Ukraine.
Radio Canada reported Monday that Canadian military personnel trained both members of the far-right Azov regiment as well as at least one Ukrainian soldier who sported the crest of a Nazi SS unit from the Second World War. The training took place in November 2020.
Efraim Zuroff of the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Israel said in an interview with this newspaper that Canada failed to properly monitor its own military training program. “The Canadian government didn’t do its due diligence,” he said. “It’s the responsibility of the Canadian defence ministry to know exactly who they are training.”
Advertisement 3
Article content
“There is no question that there are neo-Nazis in different forms in Ukraine, whether they are in the Azov regiment or other organizations,” he added.
Defence sources acknowledged the crest worn by the Ukrainian soldier in Canadian military photos is the insignia of Ukraine’s SS unit which fought for the Nazis. The other photos show Ukrainian troops with insignia linked to the Azov unit.
The report, entitled “Far-Right Group Made its Home in Ukraine’s Major Western Military Training Hub” and published by the Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies at George Washington University, details a group within Ukraine’s National Army Academy (NAA) known as the “Military Order Centuria” or simply “Centuria.”
The group is led by those with ties to the internationally active far-right Azov movement, the report says. The Azov movement has attacked anti-fascist demonstrations, city council meetings, media outlets, art exhibitions, foreign student, the LGBTQ2S+ community and Roma people.
A 2016 report issued by the Office of the UN’s High Commissioner for Human Rights details accusations against the Azov movement’s militia known as the “Azov Battalion” of torture and other war crimes in the ensuing conflict after Russia annexed Crimea in 2014. The Ukrainian National Guard later took the Azov Battalion into its ranks – where it is now known as the Azov regiment.
On Monday Ottawa Citizen military reporter David Pugliese revealed that when Canadian military officials met with the Azov Battalion in June 2018, they knew the group used the Nazi “Wolfsangel” symbol and praised officials who helped slaughter Jews and Poles during World War II. “A year before the meeting,” reports Pugliese,
Canada’s Joint Task Force Ukraine produced a briefing on the Azov Battalion, acknowledging its links to Nazi ideology.
Rather than express public disagreement with their views, Canadian military officials sought to manage any potential public relations fallout from at least two meetings, which included Azov representatives boasting about their Canadian support. More than 20 Department of National Defence (DND) public-relations officials discussed how to respond if the media reported on the Azov meeting.
Hedges: No Way Out but War
Saturday, May 21, 2022
Why Governments Promoting Electric Cars Is Dumb
While on the road, electric cars emit no carbon dioxide. That apparently is why so many governments provide financial incentives for the purchase of electric cars by the comfortably-off to very rich people who can afford them.
Thing is, most of the electricity in the US, 61% in 2021, is generated through the combustion of fossil fuel. In China, the World's largest car market, the percentage of electricity generated from fossil fuel is 70%, most of that from sulfur-rich coal. (On the plus side, the sulfur, which is emitted to the atmosphere as gaseous sulfur dioxide, is converted by atmospheric processes to white sulfate particles that reflect sunlight, thereby significantly cooling the planet.)
And another thing, making batteries for electric cars generates a lot of carbon dioxide: up to 15 tons for an 80 kW hour battery, so say the folks at MIT.
And from the user's perspective there are other problems with electric cars. Importantly, there is a limit to the distance you can travel on a charge. Beyond that, if you want to travel further, you'll have to add more batteries. Oh sure, you can recharge en route, provided, that is, you don't mind either hanging around a charging station for hours while your battery trickle charges, or you are happy to degrade your very-expensive-to replace battery by "fast charging" in, say, half an hour.
Other draw-backs to electric cars include the added weight of the battery -- should you hit another car. Well probably it's an advantage to you, but definitely a disadvantage to the other fella.
But what's the alternative, you may ask. That's simple. Extract the carbon dioxide produced by cheap fossil-fuel-burning vehicles directly from the atmosphere. Currently, that's expensive, between $250 and $500 per ton or, at the high end, about $1.25 per liter of fuel burnt. But the expectation is that that cost will fall as the technology develops. So why not just stick a charge of $1.25 a liter on motor fuel and spend that revenue on atmospheric carbon capture?
Such a policy would have two immediate consequences. First, it would massively stimulate R and D on carbon capture technology leading to reductions in process cost and industrial-scale technology adoption. Second, it would stimulate the market for smaller, lower powered, and much most affordable fossil-fuel-burning cars, like my grandpa's pre-WW2 Standard 8. That car traveled very nicely at 40 to 50 mph, which should be fast enough for anyone.
Friday, May 20, 2022
Covid-19 Vax Reduces Long-term Covid-19 Immunity
Researchers already knew that many vaccinated people do not gain antibodies to the entire coronavirus after they are infected with Covid.
Unvaccinated people nearly always gain antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein, which covers the virus’s core of RNA, as well as its spike protein, which allows the virus to attack our cells. Vaccinated people often lack those anti-nucleocapsid antibodies and only have spike protein antibodies.
The researchers examined the development of anti-nucleocapsid antibodies in people who had been part of Moderna’s clinical trial and were infected with Covid. As they expected, the scientists found that the vaccinated people were far less likely to develop the anti-nucleocapsid antibodies. Only 40 percent of people who received the shots had antibodies, compared to 93 percent of those who did not.
But they then went a step further. Because the infected people had been in the trial, their viral loads had been precisely measured when they were found to have Covid. So the researchers were able to compare vaccinated and unvaccinated people who had the same amounts of virus in their blood.
Once again, they found that unvaccinated people were far more likely to develop anti-nucleocapsid antibodies than the jabbed. An unvaccinated person with a mild infection had a 71 percent chance of mounting an immune response that included those antibodies. A vaccinated person had about a 15 percent chance.
The chart that should worry the vaccinated: the yellow line shows the odds that an unvaccinated person will develop anti-nucleocapsid antibodies to Sars-Cov-2, stratified by viral load. The blue line shows the same odds for a person who received an mRNA shot.
An unvaccinated person has an almost 60 percent chance of developing antibodies even with an extremely mild infection; a vaccinated person needs almost 100,000 times as much virus in his blood to have the same chance.Source: Alex Berenson via the Gateway Pundit.
Plus:
Possible mechanism behind mysterious COVID-19 symptomsThursday, May 19, 2022
2013: The Origins of the Ukraine War
Related:
Wednesday, May 18, 2022
Debunking Trudeau's Lies About the Truckers' Convoy
True North May 17, 2021: Several key pieces of testimony have poked holes in Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s justification for using the Emergencies Act to quash peaceful freedom convoy protestors in February.
Throughout the protests, the Liberals and legacy media made a number of claims about the convoy ranging from extremist involvement, foreign funding and millionaires bankrolling the movement. To date, all of these claims have been called into question by law enforcement officials and fundraising executives.
Several Trudeau cabinet ministers claimed in February that foreign extremists were funding the convoy to undermine Canada’s democracy. Among these ministers was public safety minister Marco Mendicino who stated – without evidence – that many of the donations had “been raised from abroad.” Minister of emergency preparedness Bill Blair also claimed that “foreign entities” were behind the protests.
Media outlets including the Toronto Star and the CBC also published articles falsely suggesting that the convoy was foreign-funded. The CBC was forced to retract a story that claimed that support for the convoy had come mainly from abroad.
Liberal MP Taleeb Noormohamed also compared the convoy donations to “terrorist financing” and called on terrorist-funding watchdogs to investigate fundraising platforms.
True North has listed nine instances where officials have categorically disputed the Liberal government’s claims about the Freedom Convoy.
Monday, May 16, 2022
Jordan Peters: Justin Trudeau Is a Liar and a Narcissist
Full Interview: Recorded on April 20, 2022, as part of a Classical Liberalism Seminar at the Graduate School of Business at Stanford University.
Saturday, May 14, 2022
Scott Ritter: Russia Will Go to Full Mobilization for War on US-Funded Ukraine
May 13, 2022: Scott Ritter: Ukraine has suffered close to 50,000 casualties
Related:
Patrick Buchanan: Why Would US Give a War Guarantee — to Finland?
Americans Don’t Want War With Russia But Republicans And Democrats Are Forcing It Anyway
Daily Sceptic: Would the U.S. Side With Ukraine’s Far-Right Against Zelensky?
Friday, May 13, 2022
Brilliant Billionaires, No. 49:Bill Gates
And in this interview, he grants that there was no chance for eradication of covid, and also that “young people don’t sick very often,” which makes one wonder about the reasons for the extended lockdowns, from which the poor suffered most. He has regrets but hey, who doesn’t?
His theme is the same as we are hearing all over the planet. Yes, it could have been done better but the people who did this to us have only learned from their errors and they will do better next time.
Even on vaccines, Bill is somehow sure that the next time, the vaccine will stop infection and spread, will be one dose, and probably won’t be an injection, as if these are points no one could have hope for in this round, and as if this is all just a matter of funding more R&D. Just like Windows Millennium Edition, it will get better.
Related:
Rumble: THE PLAN - WHO plans for 10 years of pandemics, from 2020 to 2030
US Failure in Ukraine
NY Times Shifts Pro-War Narrative, Documents Failure of US in Ukraine
Anti-War.com May 13, 2022: The New York Times has a job to do – and it has done that job spectacularly well over the past few months. The Times is a leader, in the opinion of this writer, the leader in spelling out the US narrative on the war in Ukraine, a tale designed to keep up morale, give the war a high moral purpose and justify the untold billions pouring from the taxpayers’ pockets into Joe Biden’s proxy war on Russia. Day in and day out in page after page of word and picture it has been instructing one and all, including politicians and lower level opinion shapers, exactly what to think about the war in Ukraine.
So, when the Times says that things are not going well for the US and its man in Kiev, Volodymyr Zelensky, it is a man bites dog kind of story. It tells us that some truths have gone from uncomfortable to undeniable. Such was nature of the page one story on May 11, headlined "Russians Hold Much of the East, Setbacks Aside."
Even that anti-narrative headline softens the bitter truth. The first paragraph of the story fesses up more completely, stating, "Obscured in the daily fighting is the geographic reality that Russia has made gains on the ground." Not "holding" ground but "gaining" ground. Not exactly a morale booster.
The Times goes on, "The Russian Defense Ministry said Tuesday that its forces in eastern Ukraine had advanced to the border between Donetsk and Luhansk, the two Russian-speaking provinces where Moscow-backed separatists have been fighting Ukraine’s army for eight years.". Here it reminds us that the first shots in this war were not fired on February 24, as the narrative goes, but eight long years ago in the Donbas. It is a jolting reminder for those who base their support for the war on "who fired the first shot," that their "moral" view has a considerable blind spot.
The Times continues: "…. the Donbas seizure, combined with the Russian invasion’s early success in seizing parts of southern Ukraine adjoining the Crimean peninsula ….gives the Kremlin enormous leverage in any future negotiation to halt the conflict."
It goes on: "And the Russians enjoy the added advantage of naval dominance in the Black Sea, the only maritime route for Ukrainian trade, which they have paralyzed with an embargo that could eventually starve Ukraine economically and is already contributing to a global grain shortage." More bad news.
More, "Russia has all but achieved one of its primary objectives: seizing a land bridge connecting Russian territory to the Crimean peninsula." And, "The last stronghold of Ukrainian resistance in this area, at the Azovstal steel plant in Mariupol, has been whittled to a few hundred hungry troops now confined mostly to bunkers." Ouch!
Finally, turning its attention to the economy, the Times states: "The war has "put Ukraine’s economy under enormous stress, with the heavy devastation of infrastructure and production capacities," the bank said in an economic update. It estimated that 30 percent to 50 percent of Ukrainian businesses have shut down, 10 percent of the population has fled the country and a further 15 percent is displaced internally." That is a grand total of 25% of the population displaced from their homes.
Related:
Zelenskyy Says He's Ready to Talk With PutinTuesday, May 10, 2022
Trudeau's Path to the Chinese-Style Dictatorship He So Wishes to Impose on Canadians Especially those Trucker Racist, Anti-science Misogynists
|
Dutch Party Asks Trudeau's Friend Zelensky to Account for $850 Mln Personal Wealth
Toronto Sun: Trudeau said he admired China's dictatorship -- believe him!
Vaxxed and Boosted Bill Gates Tests Positive for COVID
Steve Kirsch: New UK Government Data Show that the Covid Vax Kills More People than it Saves
Brilliant Billionaires, No. 79: The Incredibly Dumb Things Very Rich People Can Say
"At risk of stating the obvious,"
"unless something changes to cause the birth rate to exceed the death rate, Japan will eventually cease to exist. This would be a great loss for the world."
Yeah, welcome to the Theory of Evolution Elon.
With a fertility rate of 1.36, versus the replacement rate of 2.1, the Japs certainly appear headed for the dustbin of evolutionary history.
But why the particular concern for the Japanese, the World leaders in the business of replacing people with robots?
What about the Italians with at fertility rate of 1.27, which is lower even than that of the Japanese, and not much more than half the replacement rate.
Or those poor Nazified Ukrainians at 1.23. And let's not forget the South Koreans at 1.05, which is exactly half the replacement rate.
And think about North America where the historic Canadian and American populations also face the prospect of extinction, with Canada's flaccid fertility rate at 1.47 and falling, while the US rate, at 1.7, is far short of true virility, --little better, in fact, than Britain's extinction threatening 1.65.
And the Japanese have one important thing going for them. They resist mass immigration to make up for a shortfall in births.
That's a plus because, as the population shrinks, the quality of life will tend to improve: labour shortages will result in higher wages, fewer people will mean lower Tokyo apartment rents, more green space, and greater agricultural self-sufficiency. Thus, at some point in the future, the Japanese are likely to find themselves, like Elon Musk, prosperous enough to afford more than one or two children.
But not so in North America or Europe. The Brits, the Americans and the Canadians are all packing in the migrants from far and wide, Nazis from Ukraine now arriving in Canada, as must please our Fuhrer Justin; drug dealers and rapists from Central America to the US, which is evidently fine with the Bidens; and to Britain waves out of Asia, Africa and the Middle-East. Likewise in the EU, the replacement population is coming largely from Asia, Africa and the Middle-East -- mostly good people, I'm sure. But they are not Europeans.
So which nation is it that is truly under threat of extinction?
Not the Japanese, whose population will surely stabilize at a level considerably below the present incredibly crowded nationwide density of 3.5 per hectare.
But the outlook for North Americans and Europeans is less promising. They are currently undergoing rapid replacement by people from elsewhere while overall population densities and hence economic competition rises. The increasing competition for work and housing will surely drive down the already deficient fertility of the native-born populations, leading to ever more rapid replacement by the migrant tide.
Related:
What The Regime Media Didn’t Tell You—Immigrants Displaced American Workers In April; Inflation-Adjusted Wages Fell