An Exclusive Interview with Satan

In view of the interest evoked by my interview with Jesus of Nazareth, I decided to further enhance understanding of the supernatural forces at play in this world by seeking an interview with the Devil in Hell. I anticipated some difficulty reaching out to the Lord of Darkness, but my emailed request for an interview received a prompt and positive response.

Thus it was that I found myself seated the other day at a table outside a neighborhood StarBucks in conversation with a pleasant-mannered individual dressed in a well-cut two-piece suit in a good quality, charcoal gray worsted, and with a plain white shirt and a black and white polka-dot tie. His manner was charming, his features pleasant, and his complexion not, as I'd expected--dark as the event horizon of a black hole--but somewhere between olive and white.

The weather was cool, and I was glad to have worn a full-length overcoat together with a hat and scarf and to have a mega-sized mug of Starbucks' regular grind around which to warm my hands. Satan, however, seemed oblivious to the cold and indeed radiated a perceptible warmth of which I was only too glad.

Greta Thunberg, the Media and White Self-Genocide

Greta Thunberg is a 16-year-old who is, therefore, too young to have much knowledge about the very complex issue of the effect of human activity on the world's climate. Still, she makes a valid point. The media, all Western governments, and every school and university insists that anthropogenic carbon emissions, i.e., the burning of fossil fuels, is leading to what will be a catastrophic change in global climate.

What Greta Thunberg is saying, namely, that it will be her generation and its successors that will suffer the most severe consequences of this approaching disaster, a disaster brought by the actions of older generations is, therefore, entirely logical and as valid as all the fear-mongering about climate change.

Moreover, not only is Greta Thunberg's message entirely reasonable, it is highly effective for the simple reason that, when not contorted by anger or fear, Greta has a pretty face: a pretty face that should remind us of another ongoing disaster imposed upon our youngest generations by the fecklessness and criminality of older generations.

That other ongoing disaster is the destruction of the sovereign democratic nation states of Europe and their diaspora, the result of genocidal policies on abortion and immigration resulting in a collapse in the fertility of the European peoples and their replacement by people of alien race, religion and culture.

How does Greta Thunberg remind us of this other ongoing disaster, which will see Greta's generation of Swedes outnumbered in their own homeland by immigrants and their descendants?

Strangely, indeed, she reminds us of this genocidal catastrophe by virtue of the recent publication of a photograph from the 1890's showing a group of children working a placer mine in the Yukon territory.

Here's Greta:

Here's Greta's lookalike, a child gold miner gold in 1898:

And here's Greta and her lookalike side by side:

Now here's the horrifying reality underlying this story. The black and white photograph showing Greta's lookalike and entitled “Three children operating rocker at a gold mine on Dominion Creek, Yukon Territory, circa. 1898,” belongs to the archives at the University of Washington. The photo, so CTV News reports, is part of a large collection of pictures taken by Swedish photographer Eric Hegg, who documented the Alaska-Yukon gold rush. But, the report continues, and this is the grotesque and horrific part, “the ...nationality of the children remain a mystery because the photographer didn’t list their names.”

Now is that stupid, or just criminal misdirection?

The child in the picture looks like Greta Thunberg who we all know is Swedish. In fact, the lookalike is a dead ringer for Greta Thunberg. Therefore, the lookalike, photographed (not surprisingly by a Swedish photographer), must be of the same race as Greta, which is to say Swedish, or some sub-race of the Swedish people.

But no. Such an acknowledgement that there is such a thing as the Swedish nation, a biological entity designated for destruction through repressed fertility and mass replacement immigration, cannot under the rule of political correctness, which is to say enforced lies, be acknowledged.

So, Greta, you have a valid point about climate change. Your generation will indeed suffer the consequences of any ill effects of climate change more severely than your predecessors. But have a thought for your posterity.

Are there to be no more pretty Swedish girls, no more Greta lookalikes, but only mongrel Swedes, as likely black as white? Surely you think not. So fight on. Fight for an end to fossil fuel combustion, certainly, but fight also for the survival of your own posterity.

Frans de Waal: An Ethologist's Confusion About Ethics — Part II

Some time ago I wrote a two-part critique of Frans de Waal's book, The Atheist and the Bonobo, arguing that de Waal had failed to grasp the evolutionary significance of religion in the success of human groups, while advocating a return to the moral world of the apes for the betterment of society. Specifically, he advocates a world regulated by the rules of conduct set forth by Nicolo Machiavelli, in the Prince, a manual of conduct for an absolute ruler unaffected in the pursuit and retention of power by either empathy or morals. Part 1 of that critique delivers, I believe, points worth making. Part 2, however, entered I now see, a realm of incoherence, notwithstanding the seeming validity of the objective that I was driving at. Normally, coming across a flawed post from the past, I either shrug or hit the delete button. The critique of de Waal, however, seems worth getting right, especially as, according to my blog stats, people are still reading it. Here, then, is the revision, which I have temporarily pinned to the top of the page.

First Posted December 1, 2016, revised November 23, 2019, with a concluding addendum November 30, 2019: Frans de Waal, whose accounts of animal behavior have won him numerous awards and honors, believes that empathy, which is innate to both mankind and many other species, is the only effective basis for socially constructive behavior and that religion as a guide to human conduct is, therefore, both unnecessary and undesirable.

However, as I discussed in an earlier post, de Waal fails to acknowledge the limits to the power of empathy, which is most clearly expressed among family members, friends and neighbors, but which is less evident or entirely absent in interactions among strangers, especially among strangers differing in tribe, culture, race or nation.

What is an IQ-ist?

Having Followed a debate about the massive reported differences in mean IQ among nations over at Ron Unz's singular blog, I conclude that an IQ-ist true believer is a person who knows that:

(1) If you are smart enough to come up with the theory of relativity, then you are smart enough to have (a) written Hamlet; (b) composed Fuer Elise, Einer Kleine Nachtmusic, and the Blue Danube Waltz; (c) Painted the Mona Lisa; and (d) fried an egg while balancing on a wire over Niagara Falls.

(2) That a kid raised on the streets of what IQ-ists seem invariably to call a “shithole country” (e.g., USA, or at least parts thereof) is generally less adept in the manipulation of words and numbers than a graduate of Exeter and Harvard or Eton and Oxford solely because of an inferior genetic potential.

(3) The best way to deal with critics of the IQ-ist thesis is by: (a) unsubstantiated assertion; (b) unsubstantiated negation; or (c) argumentum ad vericundiam, ignoratium, nauseam, or hominem.

Such beliefs and modes of debate are characteristic of the unscientific mind. The mind of the individual unaware of the logic of scientific discovery, and in particular, the dependence of scientific advance on testable hypotheses and the rejection of hypotheses inconsistent with empirical evidence.

They are, in fact, the modes of thought of what may be a majority of psychologists, adherents of a “discipline” that brought to the world the deeply strange construct of Freudian psychiatry, the equally bizarre behaviorist’s denial of the existence of mind, and, today, IQ-ism, so dear to the hearts of race supremacists and those committed to a fascistic social order under which each person will bear a definitive mark of intellectual rank, thereby establishing a rigid hierarchy of status and authority.

Ford's New Mustang for the Baby Boomers

Theodore Beale, over at Vox Popoli, writes of Ford Motors' latest incarnation of the Mustang:

American automotive buffs are not happy with Ford permitting its new electric vehicle to wear the Mustang brand as a skinsuit. ... Although I'm not an American muscle car guy, I can sympathize. I wasn't happy when Ford acquired and trashed the Jaguar brand either. But seriously, diversity or not, how hard is it to grasp that a Mustang is a sports car, not A 4-DOOR UTILITY VEHICLE?

On this rare occasion, Vox is missing the point. Being older than Vox, older even than a baby boomer, I recall that, when the Mustang was introduced, Ford ran an ad with the words:

We Heard That the Kids Were Coming

So now is the time for the latest iteration of the Mustang, offered with the implied slogan:

We Heard That the Kids Were Going

Which is to say, they are offering the same "kids" a Mustang providing a final fun ride with the grand-kids in back.

 As for today's kids, Ford couldn't care less. Loaded with student debt, there's no way they'll be able to buy a car for years, if ever.

Ever Wondered Who Edits Trikipedia? Ambassador Craig Murray Discusses the Role of One Philip Cross and His Media and Neocon Connections

The always intelligent, always well informed Craig Murray exposes the amazing connections between Triki-Wikipedia, the invention of  ex-pornographer, Jimmy Wales, the late James Le Mesurier, a founder of the White Helmets, those angels of Middle-Eastern mercy bearing false tales about poison gas attacks in Syria, the folks who write the newspaper columns designed to shape your opinion on world affairs, and a hyper-active Trikipedia editor by the name of Philip Cross:

CraigMurray.org.uk, November 14, 2019: Perhaps the only fact on James Le Mesurier about which I would agree with the MSM war cheerleaders is that he was a very busy man. It is remarkable therefore that he found the time and inclination to follow “Philip Cross” on twitter. Given that “Philip Cross” has virtually never posted an original tweet, and his timeline consists almost entirely of retweets of Nick Cohen, David Aaronovitch and openly pro-Israel propaganda accounts, why would Le Mesurier bother to follow him?

“Philip Cross” has never posted any news other than to retweet columnists. He has never given an insight into a story. In addition to James Le Mesurier, why then were all these MSM journailsts following “Philip Cross” from before “he” gained notoriety for his Wikipedia exploits?

Read more

The New Nazis: Poles Resisting National Self-Genocide

Europe's has a population policy based on the following principles:

(1) Promote girls' education and encourage intelligent women to chose careers over family.

(2) Make up the population deficit and more through immigration of people of alien race, religion, and culture.

(3) Heavily tax the most able members of the population, including the women the state has indoctrinated to prefer money over motherhood, and use the funds so appropriated to support the reproduction of the welfare class, both indigenous and immigrant.

(4) Compel acceptance of (1) – (3) by means of K to post-graduate education heavily loaded with political correctness, with emphasis on white self-hatred, promotion of every form of perverted — that is, non-reproductive — sex, and contempt for Christianity, the ancient faith of the European peoples.

Objective: the death of the European peoples as racial and cultural entities and the Islamification of Europe.

Now those rotten stinking white, racist, Christian Poles are up in arms against their own genocide:

A thirty-eight million nation in the heart of Europe (i.e., with a population approximately the size of Spain's) has been revolting against the EU establishment and its view of European unity based on cultural and religious indifference and anti-nationalism. Polish President Andrzej Duda asked citizens to unite under "one common homeland, beyond all divisions," but acknowledged that "different ideologies and beliefs" are permitted in Poland. While millions of radical Muslim refugees have poured into France, Germany, Sweden, UK, Italy, and Spain, creating social-economic chaos on the streets of those countries, Poles are attempting to revive their nation through patriotism and traditional Catholic values. Source

So what to do?

The best idea, surely soon to be implemented by the EU's unelected leaders, is to follow the advice of Professor Christine Fair of Georgetown University in Washington, DC, who, referring to the white male defenders of Supreme Court Justice, Brett Kavanaugh when he faced unsubstantiated allegations of  sexual assault during his high school days said:

“[they] deserve miserable deaths while feminists laugh as they take their last gasps. Bonus: we castrate their corpses and feed them to swine? Yes.” Source

In response, Georgetown University, a nominally Christian and nominally Catholic institution, indeed the oldest Catholic and Jesuit institution of higher education in the US, stated that it:

“respect[s] Fair’s right to freedom of speech.”  Source

LOL.

Catholic Christianity: RIP. Indeed, US of A RIP.

Related: 
CanSpeccy: My Plan To Destroy America

Deep State Trump Resistance: The Second American Civil War

Resistance

Monty Pelerin's World: The status quo is always difficult to alter. Resistance is a normal reaction to change. The current theatrics in Washington, DC are especially revealing.

Donald Trump is many things to many people. His supporters believe him to be a savior of the American system and way of life. His opponents see him as a threat, Both views are correct. From the beginning, I viewed Mr. Trump as a wrecking ball:

… there has never been an inauguration speech like this one. Contrary to Pogo, Trump defined the enemy and it was not us. This wrecking ball clearly differentiated between the average man and the parasites who inhabit Washington. The speech was populist all the way. It was anti-establishment all the way. Clear demarcation lines were drawn. I sense that war was declared on Washington, DC today. There will be no compromise. Either Trump will be destroyed or he will dismantle much of the Washington establishment.

This assessment has been validated by subsequent events. The winner of this existential battle is still in doubt. That itself is rather remarkable. What appeared to be a quixotic crusade now takes on heroic aspects, at least for many outside Washington. What once seemed impossible no longer does.

Don Quixote Trump still may not be favored in his battle against Goliath but the odds have shifted. The American people have been awakened to how the elites have exploited them. Whether Trump wins this battle or not, the Deep State has lost the war. They have been exposed as ruthless, lying exploiters. Don Quixote has suddenly become Goliath.

Read more:

David Stockman on How the Deep State Really Works

International Man: Last year, President Trump took the unusual step of bypassing his advisors to announce his intention to withdraw all US troops from Syria quickly. The decision rattled Washington and the mainstream media. It caused former Defense Secretary Mattis to resign. Almost a year later, the US has withdrawn only a token number of soldiers. It still has thousands of troops occupying the part of the country where oil fields are located. What is going on here?

David Stockman: Well, that’s the Deep State at work.

Donald Trump is all by his lonesome. He’s home alone in the Oval Office. Now, half of it, he can blame himself. If he hires someone, a known idiot like John Bolton, what does he expect is going to happen except that everything he wanted to do is going to be undermined.

Nevertheless, he can’t seem to find anybody who can articulate on a day-to-day basis a pathway to the more restrained America First posture that he had in mind.

He’s surrounded by people who constantly countermand his orders. You have James Jeffery, the US Ambassador and special envoy to Syria saying, “Well, Trump didn’t mean that when he said he wanted the troops out of Syria.”

We have the same thing with North Korea. Trump finally said, here we are, 66 years after the armistice and we still don’t have a peace treaty, and we’re still occupying the Korean peninsula, which is of no interest to our national security one way or the other.

You have to do what I would call “contrafactual history.” In other words, if you understand what could have happened the other way, then maybe you’re not going to be so impressed with all this threat inflation.

I go back to why the Korean War happened, because I think it’s important to this whole thing going on now, with Trump trying to make a deal with Kim Jong-un.

In the late ’40s, Washington officials said that Korea is outside our sphere of influence, the line between North and South hastily drawn at the Potsdam war conference in July 1945. Dean Acheson, the US secretary of state in the late 1940s, said it was a mere surveyor’s line; it’s of no strategic influence. What if common sense had prevailed, instead of the hot-headed advice that President Truman got?

What if Truman had said, “Okay, we’re vacating this damn peninsula”? Well, it would have become a quasi-province of China, just like all the rest of them.

They’d probably be making all kinds of stuff, sending it to Walmart today, and nobody would know the difference.

Instead, we had a war. If I remember right, 54,000 servicemen were killed. The whole peninsula was pummeled, carpet bombed, and literally destroyed. It was like a wasteland in the north. There are reasons why the Kim family has survived all these years, because they hate us for what happened. People remember. It was really scorched earth. I mean, it was in some sense genocide, even then.

So, all of that happened, and Eisenhower comes in and is astute enough to say that we don’t really have national security on the line. He negotiated an armistice, and yet the War Party kept tension on the DMZ for all those years because it had to be in the playbook of threats.

Read more:

ABC's Cover-Up of Epstein's Criminal Enterprise: A Cover-up of a Cover-up With a Spiel About a Cover Up?

Is this what it seems?

Speaking of Jeffrey Epstein, she says:

So do I think he was killed? A hundred percent yes I do.

Certainly, Ms. Robach is good. 

She'd convince most guys that Jeffrey Epstein is no more.

And on the basis of what?

Nothing, actually, except her opinion, which is no better informed than yours since you have been told as much about Jeffrey Epstein and his associates as she claims to have been told three years ago.

So is this just one more cover-up?

Cover-up, perhaps, of the fact that blackmailing pedophile, Jeffrey Epstein, may have been taken care of — though not necessarily in the way you may have thought — by one or other of the proliferating intelligence agencies, American or foreign.

Is Jeff, in fact, even now enjoying the balmy early autumn sunshine of Jerusalem (25 C at the time of writing) or perhaps the early spring sunshine in Asuncion, Paraguay  (currently 26 C).

But this is Project Veritas production, and Veritas is Latin for truth. Yeah, that'd be a handy name for any government propaganda mouthpiece, wouldn't it.

So what do you really know?

Nothing actually.

All you have are some patterns of pixels on a video screen and a pretty woman's spiel. That's not a sound basis for believing anything in the political sphere, is it?

Or do you just believe whatever you last saw on the tel or read on the Internets?

Whatever your belief, the fact is you don't know anything about public events for sure, unless you happen to have been a participant. As for what you believe based on a U-Tube video, it has virtually no credibility at all.

The Place of My Birth Has Gone Insane

Posted on the campus of  East Tennessee
University Campus. Source

I was born in the North Devonshire town of Bideford, which is located on the North coast of that English peninsula jutting South-Westerly from the mouth of the River Severn where it merges with salt water at the city of Bristol. So far as I am aware, at the time of my birth, Bideford was a sane and civilized place, although as we moved elsewhere shortly thereafter, I remember little about my time there other than the occasion of being held in the arms of a red-faced gentleman shouting over the banister to someone downstairs: "It's a boy."

But in recent times, so Breitbart reports, under the all pervasive pressure of politically correct propaganda,  the town of Bideford seems to have suffered something of a collective neurotic break.Trouble arose over the fact that, 160 years ago, the Victorian author Charles Kingsley, in his historical novel Westward Ho!, dubbed Bideford “The Little White Town,” because of the many white buildings which give the town its character. 

In reference to this literary designation, mention of "The Little White town" appear on signs at entrances to, and within, the town, a fact that has now caused panic. Thus:

town councillor and former town mayor Dermot McGeough complained that “The wording ‘Little White Town’ can be perceived as ...racist and not politically correct”.

Specifically, Mayor McGeough said that:

“The wording ‘Little White Town’ can be perceived as a racist slur...” At a council meeting, he therefore put forward a motion that “the words ‘Little White Town’ be removed from all signs within the town and at the town entrances.”

Happily, it can be reported that a survey of town residents revealed opposition to this piece of imbecility by a margin of more than two to one. but Council was insistent, although, in the end, it opted for a compromise, ordering signs to bear the words: “Charles Kingsley’s ‘Little White Town’ (1855),” suggesting to any politically correct twit that it was just Charles Kingsley who was a white supremacist, not the present-day inhabitants of the town. 

But Bideford's PC cretinism may not yet have run its course, since Councillor Peter Lawrence raised the question of whether ‘Bideford Black,’ a unique earth pigment mined in the area, should be renamed.

USA: The Age of Racketeering in Education and Medicine — James Howard Kustler

Source and full video: USAWatchdog.com

Related:
I-Team: Hospital Charges $17,000 to Stitch a 2-Inch Cut in Emergency Room

Why Canada Needs Less Diversity

Jagmeet Singh, leader of Canada's New Democratic Party, revealed the ugly face of racial and cultural diversity in Canada when, during a pre-election leaders' debate, he told Maxime Bernier, leader of the People's Party of Canada, that he had no right to a place on the leaders' debate stage:

when you incite hatred,you don’t deserve a platform...your ideas are hurtful to Canada.

And in what way had Bernier supposedly incited hatred?

By opposing official multiculturalism and the Government's intention to raise Canada's immigration rate to the highest per capita rate of any country in the world, a rate considered too high by 49% of Canadians. 

And who is Jagmeet Singh, this national leader who equates opposition to higher immigration and government sponsored multiculturalism as "hatred"?

According to Indian intelligence, he is a vociferous anti-India advocate and supporter of pro-Khalistani sympathisers in Canada, the same group responsible for the largest mass murder in Canadian history, the 1985 bombing of Air India Flight 182 with 329 people, mostly Indian, on board, including 82 children under the age of 13.

More specifically, opindia reports:

According to the latest dossier prepared by the Indian intelligence officials, Jagmeet Singh, the Leader of Canada’s second-largest party, remains a ”pro-Khalistani and a pro-Pakistani” ringleader in the country despite his deep Punjabi roots. On a specific report of India’s external intelligence agency Research and Analysis Wing, Singh was denied a visa in 2013 for his anti-Indian stance. The RAW has revealed in one its report that Singh had been funding Khalistani outfits, operating from Pakistan. He is also connected with prominent Khalistani and Kashmiri separatist groups based in different countries of Europe. Latest reports also suggest that Jagmeet Singh is also trying to bring Khalistani and Kashmiri separatists under one umbrella in Canada. Recently he held a meeting in this connection at his residence in Ontario.

Bizarrely, Canada's so-called National Observer, in reporting Singh's attack on Bernier's right of free speech, accuses Bernier of anti-Semitism on the ground that he described all of his opponents (correctly, as it happens) as globalists:

He [Bernier] wasted little time ... tossing out an incendiary anti-Semitic slur ... when he declared that “the other leaders on this stage are globalists” and attacked the United Nations as a “dysfunctional organization.”

 So apparently, if you oppose the liberal genocidal plan for the destruction of the sovereign democratic nation state, then you're an anti-Semite. That is quite weird, implying as it does, that globalism is a Jewish imperative. But if globalism is a Jewish imperative, why is it anti-Semitic to say so? Or are we to understand that even truth can be anti-Semitic?

Related: 
Alain Destexhe: France: The Headscarf Debate is Not about Headscarves
VOE: Danish study: “Muslims need to leave Denmark”

Farage: The Death of Brexit

Related:
Tom Luongo: Johnson and Macron – Caretakers or Betrayers of Brexit?

Climate Panic: Economics, Ignorance and Mental Illness

Speaking at the One Young World conference in London on Wednesday, BP chief executive Bob Dudley said:

“unless you put a price on something, you can’t control how it’s consumed.” He then called for a “united effort to put a price on carbon. “One of the things we talk most about doesn’t have a price,” he said. “There’s got to be a united effort to put a price on carbon, so when you click a switch on the wall for electricity you’re going to pay a higher price.” “Getting a price on carbon,” he said, will “change the (emissions) situation more than ... four-year outlooks from politicians.” The outgoing BP boss noted that while emissions were stagnating in Europe and North America, other parts of the world were falling behind in addressing the climate crisis. “There are big coal-fired power plants opening in other parts of the world” he said “and that’s the epicenter of the problem.”

But carbon taxes are seriously harmful if applied only on a local basis. They handicap local industry by promoting the transfer of carbon-intensive industries to jurisdictions without a carbon tax.

The solution?

A countervailing import tariff on goods and services from jurisdictions without a carbon tax.

In Canada, where the re-elected Liberal Government plans the introduction of a carbon tax, the countervailing duty is absent, which is one reason that Canadian oil and gas companies are moving south of the Canada:US border — to avoid the million dollars in carbon tax on the diesel fuel consumed in drilling a gas or oil well.

The same incentive to off-shore or out-source to carbon-tax-free jurisdictions will undermine the Canadian steel, lumber, mining and manufacturing industries, which are precisely the industries where Canada has comparative advantage relative to her trading partners.

But apparently such simplistic logic is beyond the grasp of our rulers, let alone the majority of the public for whom Climate Panic seems more closely akin to neurotic illness than an environmental  problem requiring a rational solution (cf, E. Michael Jones: The Religion of Greta Thunberg).

Trudeau: Dead Man Walking?

October 22, 2019: Under Justin Trudeau's leadership, the Liberal Party of Canada won more seats than any other party in yesterday's general election, but not a majority in the House of Commons. Moreover, with only 33% of the votes cast, the Liberals received the support of fewer Canadians, a mere four million, than the main opposition Conservative Party.

Given the Trudeau government's four-year record of scandal and incompetence, the election thus confirmed our assessment that few Canadians believed they had anyone to vote for who possessed both the ability and integrity worthy of national leadership.

The outcome of the election should be a shake-up in the leadership of the three national parties, Liberal, Conservative and NDP. For Trudeau, the push may come sooner rather than later if the murmurs of an alleged sex-scandal past have substance.

As a replacement for Trudeau, Jody Wilson-Reybould — the Attorney General and Justice Minister that Trudeau fired from the cabinet and booted from the Liberal Party for the heinous offense of doing her job — seems an obvious choice for the Liberals.

However, since Wilson-Reybould was returned from Vancouver Granville as an independent, the Tories might be wise to beat the Liberals to the punch and invite Wilson-Reybould to be their leader, as a replacement for their damp rag, globalist negative-impact leader, Andrew Scheer.

Meantime, in Germany, another globalist, Angela Merkel, has just admitted that her insame plan for a multi-culti Germany has "utterly" failed. 

What Trudeau, with his commitment to the genocide of the Canadian nation, i.e., the creation of a post-national Canada, and Frau Merkel will never acknowledge is that a common culture is the pre-requisite of social harmony. Invite people who require rigid adherence to wildly different customs and beliefs to come and pursue their lifestyle in your country and look forward to big trouble.

So are we ruled by really stupid people? Or are they traitors committed to the globalist cause and thus intent on the destruction of the nations they lead?

And is Merkel's admission that multiculturalism has "utterly failed" an acknowledgement of stupidity? 

Not likely.  Merkel, who is on the way out, is using what remains of her credibility to suppress the rising tide of self-defensive German nationalism.

Trudeau seems to be making his own attempt to cover up his globalist allegiance, stating in his post-election victory speech: "In every decision we make as your government, we will always put this country and its people first."

Yeah, we'll believe that when:

(a) we see the cut that most Canadians want in Canada's planned immigration rate, which at one percent of total population per year, is the World's highest per capita rate; and

(b) we see a curb to the power of banks to create the money which grotesquely inflates urban house prices and has already led Canadian families into the heaviest indebtedness in the World.

Related:

CanSpeccy: Justin Trudeau: The Worst Canadian Prime Minister Since Pierrre Elliot Trudeau?
CanSpeccy: Nationalists Versus Globalists

Canada: Federal Election — No One to Vote For?

"Toss Trudeau" says Conrad Black in today's NaPo: he's failed.

"Your vote is your voice," says Elizabeth May in a full front-page ad in Victoria's Times Colonist newspaper: meaning vote Green, then just shut up and I'll do the talking.

I'm running to win, says NDP leader, Jagmeet Singh, meaning I'll agree to anything for a cabinet post in a minority Trudeau government.

Don't know nuthin' 'bout hiring Kinsella to call Maxime Bernier and his People's Party of Canada a bunch of dirty racists, says Dimples Scheer. The CBC is naturally headlining this to smear the Tories, having themselves spent the election campaign  smearing Maxime Bernier as a far-right-wing racist (understandably since he very reasonably advocates defunding the CBC, LOL).

Might be better, really, to forget this festival of lies, insults, and drivel known as an election campaign and fill the House of Commons with a few hundred Canadians picked at random. They wouldn't know nuthin' about nuthin' no how. But where'd be the difference from the current crop of party leaders? Well, excepting Maxime Bernier, Leader of the People's Party of Canada who opposes the plans of his globalist opponents to diversify Canada with a greater per capita rate of immigration — both legal and otherwise — than any other country in the World. He, naturally, is abused by all and sundry and is lucky to have, according to the polls, even two percent of the populace in his support.

Related:

CanSpeccy: Why Freedom Was Greater Under the Absolute Monarchy of Elizabeth I, Than Under the Democracy of Barak Obama

CanSpeccy: Globalist Elite to EuroAmerican White Trash

Ann Widdecombe Blasts Boris's Brexit Bollocks

Ann Widdecome speech to London Brexit rally: starting at 30 minutes:



Related: 

Kit Knightly: Europe is crumbling, & Britain’s elite desperately want to be part of the wreckage...

Skripal Tripal Part 2: The Coroner's Inquest Into the Death of Dawn Sturgess Has Been Adjourned indefinitely

This month the Coroners' Court announced the indefinite suspension of the inquest into the death of Dawn Sturgess. Ms. Sturgess was allegedly poisoned by deadly "developed-in-Russia" Novichok nerve agent carelessly discarded by Russian assassins intent on murdering Sergei Skripal and his daughter in the quiet English cathedral city of Salisbury.

Sergei Skripal was a Russian double agent, convicted of treason and jailed in Russia before being pardoned and released under a spy swap agreement.

Skripal's daughter, Yulia, was so far as the public has been informed, an innocent Russian citizen who happened to be visiting with her father when evil Putin's assassins arrived in England to dispatch him with Russian trade-marked nerve toxin.

Dawn Sturgess was the live-in friend of Charley Rowley, a scavenger who fished a perfume spray bottle containing Novichok that had been discarded in a public waste bin by Putin's assassins (so it is claimed by the ever trustworthy British authorities). Charley gave the deadly spray bottle to Ms. Sturgess who promptly sprayed herself to death, albeit unintentionally.

The official story of the death of Ms. Sturgess has always seemed questionable as we have discussed at length in a number of earlier posts. The indefinite suspension of the inquest into her death, raises the question of whether, in fact, Dawn Sturgess actually died.

Rather, it seems that the official account of the Skripal poisonings was a farrago of nonsense intended to smear Russia at the time that Russia was hosting the World Cup soccer tournament. In that case, Dawn Sturgess was most likely an actor in a idiotically badly planned false-flag event.

And if that were so, Dawn Sturgess was not a sad victim of Russian villainy, but a participant in a fraud on the public and a gratuitous assault on the reputation of the Russian Government. Further, it would mean that Dawn Sturgess is almost certainly now living under a different name, with the benefit of a face-lift and a new hair-do, all at the expense of a deceived British public.

When No More Stupid Wars Means No More Stupid Wars

By Patrick Buchanan:

President Donald Trump could have been more deft and diplomatic in how he engineered that immediate pullout from northeastern Syria.

Yet that withdrawal was as inevitable as were its consequences. A thousand U.S. troops and their Kurdish allies were not going to dominate indefinitely the entire northeast quadrant of a country the size of Syria against the will of the Damascus regime and army.

Had the U.S. refused to vacate Syrian lands on Turkey’s demand, a fight would be inevitable ...

Read more

Related:
Brandon Smith: The Syrian Debacle Is Actually Well Planned Chaos
Vox Popoli: The neoclown narrative
Press-TV: Syrian govt., not US, must protect Kurds against Turkey: Trump

Project Veritas: Insider On CNN's Top-Down Drive to Destroy the Trump Presidency