Biohacking Humans with DNA, Nanotechnology, IoT and 5G

 By Domagoj Nikolić

Diplomat Magazine June 7, 2020: 

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author; they do not reflect the author’s employer or any entity whatsoever with which he has been, is now, or will be affiliated.

Could it be that the “vaccines” they want to push on us, using the corona pandemic as a pretext, are connected to some kind of a deranged transhumanistic scenario? Apparently, Jeffrey Epstein had a maniacal goal to seed the entire human race with his DNA. If I read between the lines correctly, the fulfilment of this “deed” would take injecting his genetic code into the DNA of every human. 

However, spreading his genetic footprint on the whole of humanity by impregnating a bunch of rape victims or prostitutes, as was indicated by his loose talk, did not seem realistic.

It is well known that he used to hang out with prominent scientists from Harvard, MIT, etc. So, why did he so lavishly fund synthetic biology and genetic engineering?

Jeffrey Epstein and biotech research 

Epstein not only donated his own funds, but also served as “an intermediary (with) other wealthy donors, soliciting millions of dollars in donations from individuals and organizations, including the technologist and philanthropist Bill Gates and the investor Leon Black.” By and large, the beneficiaries of his largesse had a deeper fund-raising relationshipwith him than they were willing to admit, and did their best to conceal the extents of their contacts.

Numerous Harvard geneticists, including George Church, have accepted Epstein donations. He has since then, like many others, issued an apology. However, knowing what we know today, we should not take either their judgement or motives as valid. We should also make note of the fact that the same George Church appeared as a member of the anti-corona genetics team. 

In another example, a Harvard scientist named Charles Lieber took “generous” donations from Epstein. The same Charles Lieber was arrested for the undisclosed Wuhan – Harvard connection, i.e. for setting up a secret biotech lab in China, allegedly to bypass the US regulations on biowarfare research. 

His funding included more than $15M from donors such as DoD and National Institutes of Health (NIH). He “specialized in the area of nanoscience” and “became a ‘Strategic Scientist’ at Wuhan University of Technology (WUT)” that “awarded him more than $1.5 million to establish a research lab at WUT”.

An interesting article elaborating those connections was published on Joseph P. Farrell’s website, which reaffirmed that Lieber’s specialized research was nanotechnology aimed “to detect small viral particles in humans”. 

Read more

Related:

Off Guardian: 

Int’l Lawyers Bringing Class Action Over “Covid Scandal”

ABC's Cover-Up of Epstein's Criminal Enterprise: A Cover-up of a Cover-up With a Spiel About a Cover Up?

Is this what it seems?

Speaking of Jeffrey Epstein, she says:

So do I think he was killed? A hundred percent yes I do.

Certainly, Ms. Robach is good. 

She'd convince most guys that Jeffrey Epstein is no more.

And on the basis of what?

Nothing, actually, except her opinion, which is no better informed than yours since you have been told as much about Jeffrey Epstein and his associates as she claims to have been told three years ago.

So is this just one more cover-up?

Cover-up, perhaps, of the fact that blackmailing pedophile, Jeffrey Epstein, may have been taken care of — though not necessarily in the way you may have thought — by one or other of the proliferating intelligence agencies, American or foreign.

Is Jeff, in fact, even now enjoying the balmy early autumn sunshine of Jerusalem (25 C at the time of writing) or perhaps the early spring sunshine in Asuncion, Paraguay  (currently 26 C).

But this is Project Veritas production, and Veritas is Latin for truth. Yeah, that'd be a handy name for any government propaganda mouthpiece, wouldn't it.

So what do you really know?

Nothing actually.

All you have are some patterns of pixels on a video screen and a pretty woman's spiel. That's not a sound basis for believing anything in the political sphere, is it?

Or do you just believe whatever you last saw on the tel or read on the Internets?

Whatever your belief, the fact is you don't know anything about public events for sure, unless you happen to have been a participant. As for what you believe based on a U-Tube video, it has virtually no credibility at all.

The Question Nobody in the MSM is Asking About Jeffrey Epstein?

Over at the Unz Review, one Eric Rasmusen, a self-proclaimed expert in game theory, writes of the fate of Jeffrey Epstein under the title: Questions Nobody Is Asking About Jeffrey Epstein.

Amazingly, one unasked question that Rasmusen the game theorist fails to ask is: Did Jeffrey Epstein really die? In this respect, Rasmusen exactly echoes the mainstream media: Epstein is dead, the only thing to question is whether he killed himself or was he murdered?

Which, obviously, is not the only thing to question.

Epstein was with intelligence, so Alexander Acosta — Trump’s Former Secretary of Labor and the US Attorney for the Southern District of Florida who negotiated Epstein 2008 plea agreement — claims to have been told. 

The result? Acosta gave Epstein a sweetheart deal in accordance with which he was incarcerated under conditions barely distinguishable from total freedom for a minimal amount of time.

So what happened this time around. Did intelligence just decide to let justice, or possible injustice, if Epstein was indeed murdered, take its course?

Not likely, is it?

So what would “intelligence” have done?

They would surely remove Epstein from the scene by a fake murder or suicide and recycle him under another name with a modified face, and probably in another country.

How?

Easily:

pay the jailers to look the other way;

give Epstein a non-lethal dose of a paralytic drug, maybe some leftover Novichok from the Skripal caper;

wheel out the “corpse” for the media to photograph;

substitute a look-alike corpse on the way to the autopsy;

and Jeffrey’s free to pursue his interest in Ugandan Affairs with under-aged prostitutes, while snaring people of interest to “intelligence.”

That the author of this Unz Review piece, who claims to be an expert in game theory, doesn’t even think of the above scenario tells ya something.

Related:

State of the Nation: EPSTEIN-BARRgate: The Pedogate Scandal Behind the Deep State Conspiracy