By Domagoj Nikolić
Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author; they do not reflect the author’s employer or any entity whatsoever with which he has been, is now, or will be affiliated.
Could it be that the “vaccines” they want to push on us, using the corona pandemic as a pretext, are connected to some kind of a deranged transhumanistic scenario? Apparently, Jeffrey Epstein had a maniacal goal to seed the entire human race with his DNA. If I read between the lines correctly, the fulfilment of this “deed” would take injecting his genetic code into the DNA of every human.
However, spreading his genetic footprint on the whole of humanity by impregnating a bunch of rape victims or prostitutes, as was indicated by his loose talk, did not seem realistic.
It is well known that he used to hang out with prominent scientists from Harvard, MIT, etc. So, why did he so lavishly fund synthetic biology and genetic engineering?
Jeffrey Epstein and biotech research
Epstein not only donated his own funds, but also served as “an intermediary (with) other wealthy donors, soliciting millions of dollars in donations from individuals and organizations, including the technologist and philanthropist Bill Gates and the investor Leon Black.” By and large, the beneficiaries of his largesse had a deeper fund-raising relationshipwith him than they were willing to admit, and did their best to conceal the extents of their contacts.
Numerous Harvard geneticists, including George Church, have accepted Epstein donations. He has since then, like many others, issued an apology. However, knowing what we know today, we should not take either their judgement or motives as valid. We should also make note of the fact that the same George Church appeared as a member of the anti-corona genetics team.
In another example, a Harvard scientist named Charles Lieber took “generous” donations from Epstein. The same Charles Lieber was arrested for the undisclosed Wuhan – Harvard connection, i.e. for setting up a secret biotech lab in China, allegedly to bypass the US regulations on biowarfare research.
His funding included more than $15M from donors such as DoD and National Institutes of Health (NIH). He “specialized in the area of nanoscience” and “became a ‘Strategic Scientist’ at Wuhan University of Technology (WUT)” that “awarded him more than $1.5 million to establish a research lab at WUT”.
An interesting article elaborating those connections was published on Joseph P. Farrell’s website, which reaffirmed that Lieber’s specialized research was nanotechnology aimed “to detect small viral particles in humans”.
Related:
Off Guardian:
Int’l Lawyers Bringing Class Action Over “Covid Scandal”
So Ego from Guardians of the Galaxy 2 will be able to carry out his plan after all. Great.
ReplyDeleteI'd never heard of Ego of Guardians of the Galaxy, so I looked him up:
Delete"Over thousands of years, I implanted thousands of extensions of myself on thousands of worlds. I need to fulfill life's one true purpose – to grow and spread, covering all that exists, until everything is... me!"
―Ego to Star-Lord.
He stole that from Bertrand Russell who defined life thus:
Every living thing is a sort of imperialist, seeking to transform as much as possible of its environment into itself...
Depressing to see Russell's view being confirmed before our eyes.
"Every living thing is a sort of imperialist, seeking to transform as much as possible of its environment into itself..."
ReplyDeleteEvery living thing attempts to reproduce. I can think of no exception. However is it true reproduction is imperialism? That's not only a stretch, it is madness.
Take a paramecia. Is it possible to speak of it seeking anything at all? Intentionality or even consciousness? A sense of self? Is it possible to say it has wider designs-- or any designs-- or does anything other than what it has been doing what it has done rather uniformly since the formation of its life form and species? Obviously that's absurd.
I'm not even sure imperialism is understood as an attempt to transform environment "into itself".
I guess everyone loves an eccentric. Other than that I don't see how Russell got away with this sort of crap. On top of that, he was a nasty and immoral creep. He did some interesting stuff at the beginning of his career, but it was downhill from there.
In his private life, Russell appears to have been coolly calculating and brutally self-serving, which is consistent with his heritage and upbringing in the home of his grandfather who was both an aristocrat and the Prime Minister.
ReplyDeleteRussell's contribution to mathematics seems to have had minimal impact, being remembered chiefly for a paradox that Russell formulated; namely, is the set of all sets that are not members of themselves a member of itself? That, it seems to me, is the sort of thing that any reasonably bright person might come up with after a few drinks with friends at the pub.
Still, Russell's objection to WW1, which landed him in gaol, showed courage of a kind, though given his social standing it was not so hazardous as it would likely have been to an ordinary mortal. Some who refused to fight were simply shot.
At Cambridge, Russell backed Wittgenstein for a professorship. Whether that was a good thing, I am not sure.
Russell's post-WW2 proposal that the US nuke the Soviet Union while the US retained a nuclear monopoly, demonstrated just how Machiavellian he could be, and as subsequent events seem to show, how misguided.
Russell had a ready ability to assimilate ideas and reproduce them in an easy to read books. These works were not profound, but they provided millions with a wide ranging view of philosophical ideas. In this, I think Russell made an valuable contribution to the enlightenment of my generation and perhaps generations following.
In this respect, Russell was an Oxbridge professor of a common type, which is to say highly verbal. He claimed to have on one occasion dictated an entire book before lunch. The essence of this type verbal academic was revealed to me when visiting a colleague on sabbatical at Oxford. As I entered his office, he muttered, "close the door," then, after motioning me to a chair by his desk he said: "this place is absolutely useless. Everyone talks a blue streak. Nobody does anything."
Perhaps that is why Oxford and Cambridge remain among the world's leading centers of learning despite Britain's decline from world power to insignificant island nation: the endless academic conversation turns mere knowledge into something more nearly resembling understanding.
God love you, brother.
ReplyDelete