Over at the Unz Review, one Eric Rasmusen, a self-proclaimed expert in game theory, writes of the fate of Jeffrey Epstein under the title:
Questions Nobody Is Asking About Jeffrey Epstein.
Amazingly, one unasked question that Rasmusen the game theorist fails to ask is:
Did Jeffrey Epstein really die? In this respect, Rasmusen exactly echoes the mainstream media: Epstein is dead, the only thing to question is whether he killed himself or was he murdered?
Which, obviously, is not the only thing to question.
Epstein was with intelligence, so Alexander Acosta — Trump’s Former Secretary of Labor and the US Attorney for the Southern District of Florida who negotiated Epstein 2008 plea agreement — claims to have been told.
The result? Acosta gave Epstein a sweetheart deal in accordance with which he was incarcerated under conditions barely distinguishable from total freedom for a minimal amount of time.
So what happened this time around. Did intelligence just decide to let justice, or possible injustice, if Epstein was indeed murdered, take its course?
Not likely, is it?
So what would “intelligence” have done?
They would surely remove Epstein from the scene by a fake murder or suicide and recycle him under another name with a modified face, and probably in another country.
How?
Easily:
pay the jailers to look the other way;
give Epstein a non-lethal dose of a paralytic drug, maybe some leftover Novichok from the Skripal caper;
wheel out the “corpse” for the media to photograph;
substitute a look-alike corpse on the way to the autopsy;
and Jeffrey’s free to pursue his interest in Ugandan Affairs with under-aged prostitutes, while snaring people of interest to “intelligence.”
That the author of this Unz Review piece, who claims to be an expert in game theory, doesn’t even think of the above scenario tells ya something.
Related:
No comments:
Post a Comment