With one in twenty mostly vaxxed Londoners having Covid for Christmas, it's simply inane to go on pretending that the vax stops either infection by, or transmission of, SARS-CoV-2, aka Covid-19.
On the contrary, it is abundantly clear that the vax massively promotes the spread. This it does for the obvious reason that people have been led to believe the lie that the vax confers immunity. Convinced of their invulnerability, the vaxxed thus become the prime agents of viral distribution, while protecting the unvaxxed by treating them as lepers.
At best, the new-tech, so-called Covid vaccines, diminish disease severity. So if you're afraid of Covid, go get the shot. In fact, taking the vax is the prudent thing to do if you are over sixty or in one of the other Covid-vulnerable categories.
For the rest, the vax is a dubious bet. There is at least a remote chance it will kill you. But if, or more likely when, you get the bug, it will ameliorate the symptoms.
As for the risk of damage, there are thousands Worldwide who have died from the shot. Millions more have experienced persistent adverse effects, including heart damage, due to vaccine-induced blood clots, while other serious adverse consequences include neurological damage or loss of fertility. That is the reason vaxxing children who are much less risk from Covid than from the flu.
But whether or not you submit to the bullying of the vax Nazis, BoJo, Trudo, Bideau, or that crazy New Zealand woman, one thing is a near certainty: sooner or later, vaxed or unvaxed, you'll get Covid, which will have joined the motley collection of viruses that pass by the name of the Common Cold.
In fact, you'll likely get Covid over and over, but never as badly as the first time, when your immune system will take careful note of the entire viral genome and prime your anti-viral defenses against future attacks, whether by an identical virus or one of an endless number of future variants.
Note:
In the future we will provide links to new posts at gab: https://gab.com/canspeccy where you can Like, Comment, Repost, Quote or Share.
"The real contagion at loose in the world—especially among the western nations which noisily congratulate themselves as model liberal democracies to be emulated by the more benighted nations inhabiting the purported darker corners of the planet—is a virulent outbreak of statist authoritarianism."
At this time of year something like one million Brits catch a cold every day. If a cold lasts five days on average, that means something five million Brits have a cold right now, or three times as many have Covid.
Actually, that's been known for a year or more, and has been admitted by the US Center for Disease Control. It's just that the vax Nazis are such relentless liars that the general public is unaware of the truth.
3. Fatigue (either mild or severe). Sure, had a nap yesterday afternoon.
4. Sneezing. Yup, sneezed a coupla times.
5. Sore throat. Definitely, and persistent, though not severe.
Which are pretty much the symptoms of the common cold.
So that's it. The Covid panic is over, or soon will be. Omicron, vastly more infectious than every other Covid variant, has reduced SARS-CoV-2 to the status of just one more common cold virus. The modelers with their tangled computer code and preposterous predictions can now return to the academic obscurity that they so richly deserve. The politicians with their vast and needless budget deficits engineered in the name of Covid, can now start thinking about a return to solvency.
As for the World, the celebrations will shortly begin, these to be marked by a Covid-recovery stock market surge before rationality sets in and the huge cost of Dr. Fauci's foolish funding of Chinese gain-of-function virus research is assessed.
But please note, we're not anti-vax. Want a jab? Go get it, it probably won't kill you.
__________
* Severity of symptoms may vary. I had Covid early last year, meaning I have long-lived, full spectrum immunity to the novel Corona virus in whatever form it may appear. To those without prior Covid infection, Omicron may be tough, as was the worst childhood cold I remember, which was likely my first Corona virus infection.
The Covid19 “vaccines” don’t work. They’ve admitted it, and now they’re seriously trying to tell us it’s actually a good thing.
What “working” really means when your pandemic is nothing but wave after wave of meaningless positive tests and weasel-worded changes to the meaning of “cause of death”, is a different discussion for another time.
Indeed, whether they were ever meant to work, what they are actually for and why the establishment needs to push them so hard, are interesting questions for a future article.
For now, let us confine ourselves to Big Pharma’s stated intention: The “vaccines” are allegedly meant to stop the spread of “Covid19”. They don’t do it.
The “vaccines” are not even true vaccines by the traditional definition. People who have been “vaccinated” still get infected, and can still spread the infection to other people.
Such infections are called “breakthrough cases”, and their existence has run a familiar course in the media.
First they didn’t exist, then they did exist but they were rare, then they weren’t that rare but they were mild…and now they’re not just mild, they’re actually a good thing…because of “super immunity”.
That’s right, getting sick after being vaccinated might actually be good for you, according to a recent study, currently getting wall-to-wall coverage in the press.
Or as the authors of this piece put it with classic understatement:
"The data from the ONS Infection Survey, while provisional, adds support to the claim that the Omicron variant has significant vaccine evading ability." LOL
But note, this is further proof that the vaccine hastens viral spread.
Why?
Because folks have accepted the understandable but false assumption that the vax prevents infection and transmission. Thus they act without the caution of people who have not been vaccinated but who take sensible precaution against either catching or spreading the virus.
* More than 76 percent of non-Omicron Covid infections in Denmark are in vaccinated people.
* About 90 percent of Omicron infections in Denmark are in vaccinated people.
* Only 25 of the 561 people currently hospitalized in Denmark for Covid have the Omicron variant.
* People with Omicron are both less likely to be hospitalized than those with other variants and released from the hospital much more quickly - in line with what South African health authorities have reported.
In view of this total vaccine fiasco and the low severity of the latest, fast-spreading Covid variant, it makes perfectly good sense for the Japanese Government to tell citizens:
“Vaccines will never be administered without the recipient’s consent. We urge the public never to coerce vaccinations at the workplace or upon others around them, and never to treat those who have not received the vaccine in a discriminatory manner" Website of thePrime Minister of Japan.
But will the vax Nazis in Canada, Germany, Austria, Britain, etc. listen to reason?
Certainly there is no sign of any reaction between the ears of our own dear leader, Justin the Blackface.
And clearly the self-righteous joy of terrorizing the filthy unjabbed is so great that retreat from the stupid policy of punishing the unvaccinated is not soon to be expected.
Sounds bad, dunnit, as they used to say in my native Devonshire. But is it really such a big number?
It's estimated that adults in Britain get two to four colds every year, and children up to twice as many. That means around two hundred million colds a year in total, which averages out to over half a million a day. But then most colds are caught in the late fall to early spring, so at the present time of year one could expect in Britain about a million cases of the common cold per day.
So, in fact, this new, allegedly highly infectious, Omicron strain of Covid seems to be a bit of a slouch.
Moreover, it has only managed to kill one person in Britain thus far, or rather to have infected one subsequently deceased person whose actual cause of death has not been publicly disclosed, and may well not be known. Indeed, given the untrustworthness of the PRC Covid test still widely used in Britain, one cannot be at all sure whether this unfortunate person really had covid, or perhaps just a bad cold.
So, yes, it looks as though the British Government's main concern is to shill for Pfizer, Inc. and other makers of so-called "vaccines" that prevent neither infection nor transmission of Covid, of whatever the strain.
Time for the Brits to get back to normal life, which seems to be the view of voters in North Shropshire where, in a by-election, a Tory majority of 23,000 at the general election has been entirely washed away by the Lib-Dems, whoever they may be.
"Such good news isn’t apparently welcome to governments in the UK, which continue to impose more draconian measures which have served to all but cancel Christmas, despite the fact that just 15 people have been hospitalised with Omicron and just one person has died."
Quick, bring on more variant/scariants, distribute videos of folks collapsing and convulsing in the street -- You know, like those from China that kicked off the Covid scare.
...The Nazis alienated Jews on grounds of public health; made them carry health ID cards and promoted the lie that they were carriers of Typhus.
Now we are witnessing the demonization of unvaccinated individuals and the forcible removal of their kind from acceptable society: in Austria, the unvaccinated face prison sentences; in Germany, they are banned from shops; in Italy, wages are withheld; in Canada, they cannot fly; in California, unvaccinated children will be removed from school; in Greece, pensioners will face steep monthly fines for non-compliance; in Australia, the unvaccinated are hustled into internment camps. ...
The 5 signs you DON’T have “Omicron”…Or how the UK government is creating a “new wave” just in time for Christmas, using the same trick they used last time
You will NEVER be “fully vaccinated”People need to realize they are being incited to chase an impossible goal that will be pushed back over the horizon, one jab after another, forever — greatly enriching former Epstein-associate, Bill Gates, in the process.
A Danish study confirms what any immunologist who'd been consulted at the outset of the vaccination campaign would have said, namely: that natural immunity is long-term, possible for life, whereas immunity from vax-induced antibodies fades to nothing in months.
Which explains the imposition of lockdowns, mask mandates for kiddies, and the destruction of normal social life. They all served to prevent a relatively harmless virus spreading through the population and providing long-term immunity before everyone had been frightened and bullied into being jabbed multiple times.
This was a crime against their own people imposed by supposedly democratic governments.
Red line = Natural immunity from infection Yellow line = Immunity from infection plus vaccination Green line = Immunity from vaccination Vertical axis: Infection risk reduction Image Source
The common cold is, well, common. According the American Lung Association, adults in the US have two to four cold per year, children, six to eight.
There are several hundred distinct viruses that can cause a cold, including Rhinoviruses, Adenoviruses, Respiratory Cyncytial viruses, parainfluenza viruses, plus Coronaviruses, the latter responsible for perhaps a quarter of all colds.
Sars-CoV-2, or Covid-19, is a novel Corona virus that is evolving rapidly into increasingly mild forms, which is to say forms better adapted to its human host and thus less likely to kill. In time, quite soon therefore, we can expect Covid-19 to be recognized as simply another common cold virus, to which almost everyone will have some natural immunity due to frequent exposure.
At that point, vaccination will be entirely pointless, since natural immunity, boosted by frequent reinfection, will provide superior immunity to that induced by the so-called Covid vaccines -- without the risk of vaccine-induced heart damage or death.
Natural immunity is superior to that induced by the mRNA and related new-technology vaccines because it primes the immune system for a rapid response to future infection. This it does by storing fragments of the viral genome in memory T and B cells, which enables early recognition and response to subsequent exposure to the virus. Such virus-induced immune system adaptation is long-lived and probably life-long.
In contrast, the nucleic acid-based vaccines merely induce antibodies to the Corona virus spike protein. These antibodies are short-lived. Moreover, they are specific to a particular form of the spike protein. If the virus undergoes substantial mutation in the spike protein, as has occurred in the Omicron variant, the vaccine-induced antibodies lose effectiveness. Moreover, the antibodies are themselves short-lived: hence the loss of vaccine effectiveness over just a few months.
Covid will keep on killing frail elderly people and a small number of particularly susceptible younger people, just as, in smaller numbers, the common cold does now. In the short-term, the addition of SARS-CoV-2 to the common cold menagerie, will raise common cold mortality. Within a few years, however, it will have further evolved and will likely be no more deadly than the Corona viruses that already account for a large proportion of the most severe colds.
That's kind of weak. President Brandon, Joker Johnson and our very own Justin, Black-Face, Trudeau have all been relentlessly demonizing the unvaccinated on the basis of total lies. The British data, for example, clearly shows that in those over the age of 29, the rate of Covid infection has been twice as high in the vaccinated as in the unvaccinated. Any national leader unaware of this fact (see Table 2 in linked document) is an idiot. But even Justin Trudeau is not, technically, an idiot. Therefore, these people are all fucking liars.
... Day after day, the evidence just keeps mounting that some sort of Nuremberg-style accountability must be had here.
If the claims by Dr. McCullough and others are true, and they seem to be providing the evidence and credentials to back their claims, then this pandemic will end up going down as one of the worst atrocities in human history.
FUN FACT:
Omicron already behind 200,000 'cases a DAY' blares the Daily Mail's top headline, the cases a DAY, for no obvious reason being in quotes. As for the DAY, all caps, I guess that's for the reading impaired, so they don't mistakenly assume its per WEEK or MONTH or FOREVER.
But if adults in Britain have two to four colds a year as is generally believed, that would be around 130,000 cases a day, year round. But since colds are mainly experienced in the late autumn through early spring, that would equate to around 250,000 cases a day at the present time of year. So actually the number of Covid cases a DAY (bolded and in caps for the benefit of the reading impaired) is not really anything to be greatly astonished at.
BUT DON'T RELAX YET
DAILY MAIL: Omicron and Delta may strike people at the same time and COMBINE. Just in case you're beginning to relax, even inclined to forget the mask while in bed with your life partner, remember we could be about to see a Jack-the-Ripper Covid variant emerge as a result of viral cohabitation. And if that doesn't worry you, they'll have a new angle next week, since there's $billions still to be made from the jab.
In the following video, Dr. Harvey Risch, epidemiologist, MD, Professor in the School of Public Health at Yale University, explained the big lies behind a manufactured pandemic of fear made possible by the spread of a Corona virus that represents no serious risk to most of the population and, if treated early with cheap and readily available anti-viral drugs, endangers few even of the most vulnerable.
Naturally, Youtube has taken the video down. However, I believe the following brief notes provide an accurate summary of Professor Risch's comments.
"Natural immunity is how we're going to get out of this endemic disease."
"We have had a pandemic of fear. Fear has affected nearly everybody, whereas the infection has affected relatively few"
"... its been a very selective pandemic, and predictable ... [with marked differences in vulnerability] young versus old, healthy versus [those with] chronic disease... So we quickly learned who was a risk and who wasn't...however, fear was manufactured for everybody, and that has characterized the whole pandemic: people's fear and response to that fear."
"People in positions of authority spread a much worse picture... that everybody was at risk everybody could die, everybody needed to find protection, everybody needed to stay in their homes, not go out, not socialize to protect themselves and protect society. And people were quite afraid as anyone would be ... because one trusted ... government, authorities, scientific authorities, medical people, and public health institutions, all [spreading] the same message."
Videos of Chinese people collapsing in the street we now know were "fake videos to induce fear."
Dr. Rische then explains how drugs such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine which are of demonstrated effectiveness in early treatment of respiratory viral disease were discredited, because they were ineffective in treating those will severe post-viral infection pneumonia.
"There was a smear campaign against the drug."
"Where's the purpose? Why one would suppress [an effective treatment] something that costs 80 cents a day."
" the people who disagree with me (about the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin in the early treatment of Covid) don't provide counter evidence, they say 'the FDA disagrees with you,' or 'the CDC disagrees with you'."
"A lot of people died who didn't need to... if the mortality data are accurate, and there are reasons not to believe them .. this has been a pandemic of fear and agencies have magnified the fear in order to control behavior."
Among healthy children, mortality from Covid has been "very close to zero... lower than the number who get hit by lightning ... "
"So why are we forcing all children to get vaccinated to save approximately zero."
"We know who are the at risk children. ... all children across the country do not need to be vaccinated."
"It's not much different from a light flu or a cold, in children."
"Seventy-five percent of adults who have had Covid were asymptomatic"
Almost everyone in the US has now had Covid, in most cases without symptoms.
Lockdown state were subject to epidemic waves of Covid once the lockdowns ended. "It was misguided to attempt to suppress something that was going to become endemic no matter what anyone did."
A rational response to Covid "did not happen because of financial interests for selling products to deal with it instead of letting (the acquisition herd immunity) happen on its own."
"It was misguided to try to suppress something that was going to be endemic no matter what anybody did."
"We do not want to live in a 'subscription model' of vaccination, where people have to get these vaccines every three or four or six months ..."
"There's evidence from Public Health UK, that the vaccination reduces by a small increment the ability of the immune system to cope with infections, in general. ... if that happens each time you get vaccinated, and you have to get vaccinated every six months, after three or four years have passed, you may have made sizable damage" to the ability of your immune system to cope with other viruses.
"The vaccination strategy was a very simplistic idea." People have been forced to accept the management of the pandemic "based on plausibility, 'vaccine'? that sounds plausible, we'll go with that... while the ramifications of that were suppressed, our government agencies suppressed that, as early treatment was suppressed."
"You have to ask, where all this malfeasance came from."
"The whole public health institution, and the medical institution, in Germany, in the 1930s, promoted the Nazi propaganda construed as "how to manage public health". In times of famine, they decided that they would remove ... helpless, handicapped, disabled, young people, frail elderly... They rationalized operational considerations without moral considerations... and that's what's happened to us..."
"when you have big lies being propagated as propaganda through the media, through the government... don't believe your own eyes:
[But] these doctors are treating patients successfully!
Oh no, those drugs don't work.
This was a big lie."
And as a result "doctors are just as frightened just as anxious as everybody else. Maybe more so. They have invested so much in their careers they have even more to risk than somebody else. They went into their field because of stature and considerations of accomplishment, and doing well for their society and their patients... so they're more likely to toe the line... and that line has been forced on them by the corruption of the medical agencies, the medical review boards of the States. The Pharmacy Review Boards have all pushed a top-down message from FDA, CDC and WHO."
So who you gonna believe? Tweedledum and Tweedledee, aka, Justin Trudeau and Erin O'Toole, or Dr. Harvey Risch?
LOL, NewSpeak, discrediting itself, the author of this hit piece being neither a physician nor a scientist with relevant expertise but a "teacher of rhetoric."
Vax passports work well at forcing people to get vaxxed, which is their purpose.
That they are supposed to protect the vaxxed from the unvaxxed is just one of those transparent lies from the likes of Justin Trudeau to justify compelled treatment with an untested medication in contravention of the Nuremberg Code.
The Nuremberg Code 1947 Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
During the course of the experimentthe scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
More than half of US voters are concerned that COVID-19 vaccines could have harmful side effects, and don’t think the federal government should have the power to make vaccination mandatory.
Yet all governments of what used to be known as the Free World are determined to punish citizens relentlessly and with increasing severity so long as they refuse the untested shot that has already killed tens of thousands, caused injury to hundreds of thousands, and is known to increase the spread of Covid-19.
Why?
And why would anyone in a future election -- assuming there is a future election as opposed to a charade such as the last US Presidential election -- vote for any one of these tyrannical liars and buffoons now making a mockery of the notion of free society.
There are a number of reasons why it is so hard to get South Africans to take the umjovu, the injection: appalling technical management of the outbreak, a prevailing scepticism towards science, wariness about the Government and a wide-spread apprehension by the poor and marginalised that this is at best another form of repression and at worst witchcraft.
Those poor and marginalized Africans may just have a better understanding of how the elite view them than your typical virtue-signalling, double- or triple-jabbed, mask-wearing, middle-class citizen of the West.
In common with the rest of the world, South African epidemiological estimates of fatalities at the outset of the coronavirus outbreak verged on the fantastical. Initial predictions were for between 87,000 and 350,000 fatalities in the first phase. (Whereas) there were (just) 103.
Wow, actual deaths far below 1% of predicted. So the South Africans did even better than the Italians who revised their initially reported Covid deaths down by 97%.
Beside the deaths due to forcing sick people into care homes, thereby setting off a deadly epidemic of respiratory disease among the elderly (Covid, perhaps, or maybe just the flu or even the common cold), plus deaths due to forgone hospital treatments to make way for supposed Covid cases, has Covid killed anyone?
Increasingly, Covid takes on the appearance of a psychological warfare agent deployed by the elite in a covert war against the people.
The objective? "To set ourselves on a new an more sustainable course," or course, meaning: depopulation through an increased death rate and reduced fertility; mass impoverishment; and in general ridding the earth of the mass of useless eaters in an age of increasing automation plus artificial intelligence.
This presents facts and arguments that demolish the Canadian and British Columbia Governments' case for universal vaccination, and in particular the case for vaccinating children. Please pass it on.
ZERO Covid deaths of healthy German kids over 4 or adolescentsThe odds that a healthy child aged 5-11 would require intensive care for Covid were about 1 in 50,000, the researchers found. For older and younger children, the odds were somewhat higher, about 1 in 8,000...
But St. Bonnie and Die Trudeau Fuhrer say we gotta vax 'em anyhow, just in case... whatever.
Buchanan.org, December 3, 2021: With the drowning deaths of 27 migrants crossing the Channel from France to England, illegal migration from the Third World is front and center anew in European politics.
Prime Minister Boris Johnson has proposed that France take back to its shores all migrants who cross the Channel illegally and come ashore in Britain.
In the run-up to French elections this April, a startling development suggests that resistance to illegal migration is spreading and the idea of dealing with it resolutely and unapologetically is taking root.
Marine Le Pen, president of the rightist National Rally, formerly the National Front, who is expected to reach the finals for president of France against Emmanuel Macron, is suddenly being challenged.
The rising star on the right is Eric Zemmour, who, writes The New York Times, “became one of France’s best-selling authors in the past decade by writing books on the nation’s decline — fueled, he said, by the loss of traditional French and Christian values, the immigration of Muslim Africans bent on a reverse colonization of France, the rise of feminism and the loss of virility, and a ‘great replacement’ of white people.”
Zemmour is being called “the Donald Trump of France.” And he and Le Pen are now running third and second behind Macron in the polling to become the next president of France, which suggests the power of the issue on which they agree: uninvited and unwelcome Third-World migration.
“You feel like a foreigner in your own country,” said Zemmour in his announcement speech Tuesday, declaiming, “We will not be replaced.”
E-mailed to me by a friend this morning, I read the first paragraphs of the following article from the November 20 issue of the Spectator with a distinct sense of deja vu, as though re-reading my November 10 blog post -- Covid Vaccination to Promote the Spread.
Still, the old original Speccy has, in its own good time, reached the right conclusion about the preposterous vax mandates issued by the lockdown Nazis from Ottawa to Austria, and from Washington, DC to New South Wales. So, for any who may have missed our own decisive assessment, here is the Spectator`s worthy reprise.
The absurd theatre of vaccine passports
By Lionel Shriver:
The Spectator, November 20, 2031: When a column highlighting under-appreciated breaking news has had absolutely no impact on the course of events (per usual), the urge to make the same point again is irresistible.
In August, Public Health England released data which shows that vaccination does not appreciably guard against Covid infection and transmission and protection worked out at around 17 per cent for the over-fifties. As I observed then, this would mean the vaxxed and unvaxxed pose a comparable danger to each other. All Covid apartheid schemes are therefore insensible.
Fresher information has fortified this conclusion of the summer. In every age group over 30 in the UK, the rates of Covid infection per 100,000 are now higher among the vaxxed than the unvaxxed. Indeed, in the cohorts aged between 40 and 79, infection rates among the vaccinated are more than twice as high as among the unvaccinated. PHE’s fruitlessly rechristened body, the UK Health Security Agency, frantically clarifies that the data ‘should not be used to estimate vaccine effectiveness’, a caveat which I include for the sake of accuracy. But the differences in the infection rates are drastic enough for you to draw your own conclusions.
As for the comparative contagiousness of each group, the data is mixed. A study published in Nature early last month confirmed PHE’s finding that the Covid-positive vaxxed and unvaxxed carry nearly identical viral loads; hence they should be similarly infectious. But viral load turns out to drop more quickly in the vaccinated, making them infectious for a shorter period. The study shows that ‘people who become infected with the Delta variant are less likely to pass the virus to their close contacts if they have already had a Covid-19 vaccine than if they haven’t’.
The myth of ultra-contagious anti-vaxxers dispersing plague like rats has fostered gratuitous rancour
That’s the good news. Now for Nature’s bad news: ‘But that protective effect is relatively small, and dwindles alarmingly at three months after the receipt of the second shot… Unfortunately, the vaccine’s beneficial effect on Delta transmission waned to almost negligible levels over time.’ Three months after vaccination, your chances of passing on the Delta variant are ‘on par with the likelihood that an unvaccinated person will spread the virus’.
Mercifully, the vaccines’ protection from hospitalisation and death is slumping slowly and remains considerable. Stress on healthcare systems and excess deaths are the only reasons Covid is a concern of government.
All this information is in the public domain. Yet due to doublethink, idiocy, mulishness, duplicity, derangement or all of the above, policy-makers are refusing to act on its implications. The absurd theatre of vaccine passports in continental Europe is worse than pointless. Gatekeeping of pleasure palaces promotes the wrong impression — statistically, the lie — that the unvaccinated riff-raff exiled to the pavement pose a far graver threat of communicable disease than the diners in the nearby banquette who, like you, have righteously got the shot. In truth, the double-jabbed airline passenger in 24A can be just as risky a seat-mate as the great unwashed banished from the flight.
Officialdom’s stubborn refusal to register that vaccination does not rule out Covid infection or transmission has catastrophic consequences. As England’s adult social care sector has more than 100,000 vacancies already, the compulsory sacking of unvaxxed care-home staff could close up to 500 facilities that the nation can’t afford to lose. A vaccine mandate for NHS employees will likewise lead to significant staff attrition, when the service also suffers from about 100,000 unfilled jobs.
Stopped for now by the courts, Joe Biden has bullied on with his edict that all American businesses with 100 or more employees require their whole workforce to be vaccinated, or submit to onerous weekly testing, with a whopping $14,000 fine per unvaxxed hire. Austria has just implemented a lockdown for its entire unvaccinated population of two million. Already barred from restaurants, hair salons and cinemas, now these poor pariahs can barely leave the house.
The myth of ultra-contagious anti-vaxxers dispersing plague like rats in the Middle Ages has fostered gratuitous rancour and division. A friend in New York declared recently that she hoped all the unvaccinated would simply die.
By spearheading the vaccine drives, governments have attached themselves to a product. They’re implicitly in league with the pharmaceutical industry, not by means of a conspiracy, but because of perceived common interest. Successful vaccine? Successful government. The mainstream media and swaths of the medical establishment have also attached themselves to the product. All these parties are in cahoots to maintain a Manichean social partition: you must be all in, or you’re all against. Any appreciation for the risks or limits of vaccines casts you as a dreaded anti-vaxxer. So any feel for nuance makes you stupid. Any short-of-fanatical devotion to the perfect benevolence of vaccines makes you crazy.
Yet the product is a bit of a disappointment. It reduces death and hospitalisation, but can’t stop Covid from spreading. The virus continues merrily to sweep through heavily vaccinated populations. What we have here, then, is an advertising problem. The purveyors of products are inclined to overpromise. Adverts for a hair-loss treatment tend to boast not ‘Stimulates some minor follicular growth’, but rather ‘Cures balding!’ Having oversold their adopted elixir, governments won’t retreat from the cures-balding pitch. ‘Won’t keep you from getting sick or even from making other people sick, but prevents dying a lot of the time!’ makes for a lukewarm slogan.
I’m double-vaccinated — gladly so, on balance. But I’ve no fear of vaccine virgins. As the medical case for shunning the unvaccinated is unconvincing, vax passports and employment mandates function purely as blackmail. As a judge decreed when staying Biden’s edict: ‘The mandate’s true purpose is not to enhance workplace safety, but instead to ramp up vaccine uptake by any means necessary.’
Much western public health policy is now irrational. Governments need to detach from the product. Instead, they’ve detached from the facts.
CALGARY, Alberta: The head of the Justice Center for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) says Canadian universities with COVID jab mandates are violating the Nuremberg Code by “punishing students who exercise their legal right to bodily autonomy.”
“Universities are blatantly violating the Nuremberg Code, as well as the Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights by pressuring students to get injected,” John Carpay said in a JCCF video posted Monday titled “Universities violate Nuremberg Code with vaccine coercion.”
“When you tell a student, get injected or get expelled, there is no free and informed consent to this vaccine.”
Carpay said in his video that the Universal Declaration of Bioethics and Human Rights provides that any “preventive diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention” should only be carried out with the “prior free and informed consent of the person concerned based on adequate information.”
Facts have never bothered the vax Nazis yet. Why would they now? Still, a good review of the "self-contradictory supposed “facts” of the schizophrenic covid story"
Otherwise known as an incentive to, um, commit euthanasia, except that Covid is not incurable and the lethal treatment hospitals provide is neither painless nor received voluntarily.
The vaxxed know in their hearts that the vax doesn't work. So naturally they blame anyone but themselves, which is to say the unvaxxed, for their having fallen for the vax scam.
Note to Daily Mail Headline Writer: Studies find facts (sometimes, anyhow), they don't specify moral imperatives. That said, sure, if my kid had severe asthma, I'd be OK with giving them the vax
The Nuremberg Code 1947 Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts: