Friday, July 8, 2022

The Georgia Guide Stones, Covid-19, and Original Antigenic Sin

I enter the above heading in the contest for the world's most obscure blog post title, a title that I will now attempt to explain. 

The Georgia Guide Stones, as any conspiracy theorist knows, were 19-foot-tall slabs of granite erected in a farm field in the US State of Georgia, inscribed with globalist directives including the injunction to eliminate nine tenths of the world's population, while selectively breeding the posterity of the remainder. These stones have now been taken down, the first with an explosive laid by an unknown hand, the rest with a backhoe presumably on orders from Georgia State authorities. 

In what way could Covid be related to the Georgia Guide Stones? Simply on the presumption that the virus is the intended mechanism for global depopulation. 

But how can that be, since the Covid mortality rate is so low? The answer could be what is known in the technical literature as original antigenic sin (OAS).

Original antigenic sin is the whimsical name for a particular feature of the action of the human immune system. What is it? The answer is fairly straight forward, but, as set forth below, the explanation has a number moving parts. 

On first infection by a pathogenic organism, the immune system develops proteins, known as antibodies, that bind to one or more constituents of the alien organism thereby inactivating it. The constituents of the pathogen in response to which antibodies are formed are known as antigens. Thus, for example, infection by the SARSCoV-2 virus, aka Covid-19, elicits the production of antibodies to various protein constituents of that particular virus. Best known among Covid-19 antigens is the infamous spike protein, which enables the virus to enter human cells, while damaging the affected tissues in the process. 

The antibodies that the immune system evolves in response to the presence of an antigen, bind to the antigen, thereby preventing it from serving its function, whether that be, in the case of a viral antigen, the invasion of the cells of the host organism or in the replication of the virus once cell entry has been achieved. 

Having created an antibody, a process that may take several weeks during which viral infection can proceed, the immune system retains cells, known as memory B-cells, that are capable of producing the same antibody on short notice in the event of a future infection. That is the essence of disease immunity, and is the phenomenon upon which the effectiveness of vaccination against infection depends. In vaccination, a pathogen-derived antigen, or a non-infectious form of the pathogenic organism, is injected to induce the production of pathogen-specific antibodies resulting in long-lived disease immunity. 

Original antigenic sin results when infection by a particular pathogen is succeeded by infection by a evolved version of the same pathogen in which the antibody-inducing antigen, for example the spike protein in the case of Covid-19, differs due to mutation from the immunity inducing antigen of the earlier infection or vaccination. What happens then is that the mutated antigen evokes rapid production of antibodies effective against the original antigen. This reaction is a sin if the mutation in the antigen of the newly infecting pathogen prevents effective binding by the antibodies to the original antigen, which are what the host organism is producing. In that case, the immune system kicks into high gear producing antibodies that don't work.

Here then is how OAS could be exploited to cut a huge swathe through the human population. 

First, let loose a virus such as Covid-19 that is both highly infectious and sufficiently scary to compel universal vaccination. 

Next, release a novel strain of the virus with mutations that massively increase virulence while modifying the antigen against which the vaccine-induced antibodies are effective (the spike protein in the case of Covid-19 mRNA vaccines) in such a way that it resists binding by the vaccine induced antibodies. 

The result? The immune system goes into overdrive producing ineffective antibodies, and people die by the billion. 

The above conspiracy theory is just that, a theory, without any supporting evidence that I am aware of. But it does demonstrate that we live in interesting, and dangerous, times. 


Related:


Since COVID “Vaccines” Were Unleashed, Athlete Deaths Are Up 1700% 
Best not be an athlete then (Big Pharma spox)

Covid Vaccine Boosters Are Killing One in Every 800 Over-60s and Should Be Withdrawn Immediately, Says Leading Vaccine Scientist

EU Parliament Member Drops Nuke on Universal COVID Vaccine Campaign – “This is the WORST Crime Ever Committed on Humanity” (VIDEO)

Beijing Scraps China's First COVID Vaccine Mandate In Just 48 Hours After Furious Social Response

Natural Immunity 97 Percent Effective Against Severe COVID-19 After 14 Months: Study

Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line

More Vaccines, More Infections: Scotland Has 50% Higher Infection Rate Than England Despite Being More Highly Vaccinated, Data Show Original Antigenic Sin?

Twitter Admits it Was Wrong to Ban Alex Berenson and Reinstates His Account in First Ever Tech Censorship Legal Dispute Climbdown 
(Alex Berenson on Substack)

8.3 Million People in England on Antidepressants After Lockdowns, Up 7% in One Year Blimey! The whole country's going nuts. Those whom the gods, or globalists, would destroy, they first make mad. Come on folks: fight back and you'll feel better. 

Another Conspiracy Theory: COVID, Capitalism, Friedrich and Boris

Mosquitoes Testing Positive to Rare, Deadly Viruses in US Months After Bill Gates Released Millions in The Wild

Wednesday, July 6, 2022

Battery Electric Automobiles: A Passing Fad?

Virtue is widely attributed to those driving an electric car rather than a carbon-emitting gas-guzzler. It is questionable, however, whether propulsion dependent on half a ton or more of lithium ion batteries is any easier on the environment than use of an internal combustion engine. For one thing, battery electric cars come with a substantial up-front carbon-emission cost relating to the mining of lithium for the battery. For another thing, much of the electricity that powers battery electric cars, whether in the US, China, or Europe, is generated by carbon-dioxide-emitting, coal-fired generating stations. 

But batteries are not the only way to power electric cars. This is evident from the recent development of hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles (and here) that offer the power and performance of a Tesla S without the massive weight, cost and negative environmental impact of a battery. These are one off vehicles, but they demonstrate an electric vehicle technology with which Tesla and other battery electric car makers may soon find themselves having to compete. 

Another way to make automobile use carbon neutral would be to remove from the atmosphere carbon dioxide equivalent to that emitted by gas-powered automobiles. The cost of so doing could be very much less than the cost of switching to electric propulsion. For example, combustion of a litre of gasoline produces 2.3 kilograms of carbon dioxide. The cost of extracting 2.3 kilograms of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere with technology now at an advanced stage of development would be around 15 cents. Thus a moderate charge added to the price gasoline (about 50 cents per US gallon), if applied to the creation and operation of carbon capture plants, would make gas-powered automobiles carbon neutral. For the motorist driving 10,000 kilometers per year, that would add $580.00 to their yearly motoring cost, which is less than the cost of trading a standard automobile for a Tesla.

But whatever may be the outcome of technology competition at the high end of the electric vehicle market, it will be at the bottom end of the market that electric vehicles with small batteries and short range are most likely to win out, as they already have in China. There, the clunky looking, short-range Hongguang Mini is selling a million copies a year at a cost competitive with the cheapest gas powered automobiles. Such vehicles, if made available with better styling will likely prove hugely popular as city runabout/commuter cars in Western markets. Introduction of such vehicles to Western markets will be delayed however, as established automakers strive to avoid undercutting sales of more expensive family-sized sedans and SUVs, whether gas or electric.

Another type of low emission vehicle is the plug-in hybrid for which there is a considerable present demand. There is no doubt such vehicles can save much gas. But the plug-in hybrid is, like the big battery electric, a clunky solution, having two full drive trains, one electric, the other dependent on an internal combustion engine. This makes for high cost, high vehicle weight, and hence a vehicle with a high embodied carbon content. so although the plug-in hybrid will play an interim role in the transition to low carbon transportation, it does not constitute an likely end product of automobile evolution.

Related:

Electric Vehicles May Present Major Problem During Natural Disaster Evacuations

Electric Cars – Want One? I don’t think so!!

Friday, July 1, 2022

Covid: A political device to subordinate citizens by means of unending official lies spewed by medically unqualified people

 PMC: National Library of Medicine: COVID UPDATE: What is the truth?


The COVID-19 pandemic is one of the most manipulated infectious disease events in history, characterized by official lies in an unending stream lead by government bureaucracies, medical associations, medical boards, the media, and international agencies.[3,6,57] We have witnessed a long list of unprecedented intrusions into medical practice, including attacks on medical experts, destruction of medical careers among doctors refusing to participate in killing their patients and a massive regimentation of health care, led by non-qualified individuals with enormous wealth, power and influence.

For the first time in American history a president, governors, mayors, hospital administrators and federal bureaucrats are determining medical treatments based not on accurate scientifically based or even experience based information, but rather to force the acceptance of special forms of care and “prevention”—including remdesivir, use of respirators and ultimately a series of essentially untested messenger RNA vaccines. For the first time in history medical treatment, protocols are not being formulated based on the experience of the physicians treating the largest number of patients successfully, but rather individuals and bureaucracies that have never treated a single patient—including Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, EcoHealth Alliance, the CDC, WHO, state public health officers and hospital administrators.[23,38]


Related: 


ZH: Canada's Health Minister: "You Will Never Be Fully-Vaxxed" Are these guys taking a cut on every jab, or what?


“There’s No Herd Immunity and Covid is Still Wreaking Havoc,” Says Imperial Professor of Immunology

The Insufferable Arrogance of the Constantly Wrong
Pick any major story of the past three years—e.g. Lab Leak, Jussie Smollett, Russiagate, Ukrainian Biolabs, Ivermectin, Hospitalizations From COVID v. With Covid, January 6th, ‘Transitory’ Inflation, and of course Hunter’s Laptop—and you will find absolutely hysterical narrative pushing up front followed by retractions, corrections, and outright denials as reality became undeniable.

In the meanwhile, our civilization was ripped apart, our citizens were gaslit and impoverished, and in countries across the Western world, innocent people were removed from polite society, branded as lepers, and fired from their jobs.

Why? Because there is one story that just won’t die and for which no corrections have been issued—the shibboleth that vaccination can prevent infection, transmission, and help “end” COVID.

While there is never an excuse for hateful rhetoric towards, and intervention in, the personal medical choices of law-abiding Americans, perhaps one could have, kinda sorta, understood the campaign if the new vaccines had provided long-lasting immunity and prevented community transmission. They do not.

Early on we were told: “Nine out of ten [vaccinated] people won’t get sick” (Columbia University feat. Run-DMC, February 12th, 2021, no this is not a joke); “Vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don`t get sick” (Dr. Rochelle Walensky, March 29th, 2021); “When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not going to get infected” (Dr. Anthony Fauci, May 17th, 2021). ...

Thursday, June 30, 2022

Without Parliamentary Debate, Trudeau Sends Canada to War with Russia

That's right, Trudeau has sent Canada to war with Russia: Canada has sent special forces to aid Nazified Ukrainian forces kill Russians and ethnically Russian Ukrainians in Ukraine's Donbas region. That's in addition to sending Howitzers to Ukraine to help Ukrainian forces kill Russians: Russia being, geographically, our closest neighbors after the United States. 

Whether Russia will respond to Canada's latest provocation by launching one of their high precision guided missiles at Justin Trudeau's Parliament Hill office in Ottawa remains to be seen. Given the current opinion-poll standing of Trudeau's Liberal Party, most Canadians would likely approve.  

Russia's present leadership seems disinclined to act impulsively, however. Payback for Canada will likely come later as a carefully calibrated package designed to hurt, not the political leadership but Canada. By that time, Justin Trudeau, Canada's low IQ Prime Minister, will likely have departed the political scene, which is to say, he will most likely have been booted by his own party, which has no time for losers, thereby providing further evidence that "the evil that men do lives after them." In the case of our boy Justin, what good will be interred with his bones, is hard to imagine. 

Related: 

Scott Ritter interviewed by some Russian guy July 8, 2022: 

MofA July 5, 2022: 'Western' Media Spread Copium To Prolong The War In Ukraine

Canadian Government Creates Pamphlet to Teach School Children that “Trump’s Wall” is Racist and “Free Speech” is Common Defense of “Hate Propaganda”

US Colonel Douglas McGregor, July 2, 2022: Douglas MacGregor: Washington wants the war in Ukraine to continue

Poles demonstrating in support of Russia!

MoA: Lysichansk Now Under Russian Control

Pravda.ru: Ukraine's Javelins and Stingers will eventually kill US and EU citizens



A German journalist living in eastern Ukraine’s Donbas region has been criminally charged by the German government for interviewing Ukrainian citizens and reporting her findings.

The journalist explained she is “doing interviews with people in Donetsk and merely translating them into German.”

“I am simply filming everything I see around,” Lipp added.

She inquired rhetorically “what is it that’s illegal in that, or dangerous?”
Actually, she knows very well why her actions are dangerous. She is making it clear to ordinary Germans that ethnically Russian Ukrainians are subject to a US - NATO backed, Zelensky-led genocide -- genocide being something today's Germans are supposed to be against. 

Pentagon Agency Wants Arms Monitors On Ground In Ukraine To Track Billions In Hardware Shipped

Moon of Alabama: Ukraine - The Bear Caught The Kraken By Using This Trick

Paul Craig Roberts: The Road to Armageddon Is Being Set in Stone (by dim-bulb leaders such as Justin Trudeau -- look at the idiot here (fourth from right). Actually, apart from Macron and the tall guy at the right, they all look more or less idiotic.)

Scott Ritter: EXPOSING the lies in Ukraine

Monday, June 27, 2022

Covid’s Infection Fatality Rate Now Same as Seasonal Flu

Daily Skeptic, June 22, 2022: Death rates from Covid are lower than ever, according to an analysis by Professor Carl Heneghan and Dr Jason Oke carried out for the Mail on Sunday. The IFR is now ~0.0333%, similar to seasonal influenza.

Experts say there is little need to fear a recent surge in cases as fewer than one in 3,000 infected people now dies from coronavirus – with the rate even lower for the vaccinated.

The analysis of official data by Oxford University shows the ‘infection fatality rate’ has dropped about 30-fold since the pandemic began due to a combination of vaccine protection and naturally acquired infection.

Professor Carl Heneghan of Oxford’s Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, who carried out the analysis with statistician Jason Oke, said: “There have been an astonishing number of Covid infections so far this year, but deaths have come down.

“Now we are looking at an infection fatality rate for Covid of around one in 3,000 which is comparable with seasonal influenza. 

Related: 

Harvard Prof. on Covid Science Denial by Both Government and University

Comments of Harvard University Prof, Martin Kulldorff via the Daily Skeptic

On the scientific community’s denial of natural immunity…

We’ve known about natural immunity since 430 BC during the Athenian plague. So this is not a new concept. It would have been shocking if the immunity from the vaccine was better than the immunity from having recovered from Covid. So by pushing these vaccines on those who already had Covid, was both unnecessary and unethical, but it also diminishes the trust in public health authorities and diminishes the trust in vaccines. […] These vaccine fanatics (e.g., Canada's low-IQ PM, Justin Trudeau) who insisted that everybody should be vaccinated, including those who already have immunity from having recovered from Covid, I think they have destroyed the confidence in vaccines in general, to an extent that a small group of pre-Covid, so-called anti-vaxxers had never succeeded.

On the reaction to the Great Barrington Declaration…

The difference was that it came from three people other than one person. All of the three of us have worked on infectious disease technology. […] All of us came from reasonably respectable universities: Oxford, Harvard and Stanford. So it was impossible to ignore. We were attacked, including by the NIH Director Collins and Anthony Fauci and Jeremy Farrar at the Wellcome Trust here and Christian Drosten in Germany who called us pseudo-scientists. But I think the key thing was to show the public that there was not scientific consensus for lockdowns.

On whether he was supported by Harvard after speaking out…

No, I didn’t get much defence from the university, no. […] I got private emails from many of the faculty members, many of whom I’d never heard of before. So there was support, yes, from individuals. […] I think that’s a huge problem for science as we move forward, because science can only thrive with discussions. It’s a process. And if we don’t have open discourse about science, science is going to die.

On the problems with epidemiological modelling…

I think these models where you predict a certain number of people are going to die, are pretty useless. And the key thing is what is the optimal strategy to use? So in the case of Covid, in the beginning, we didn’t know exactly what was the infection-fatality rate, which is what’s the risk of dying if you get infected, because we didn’t know how many people had got infected. The optimal strategy doesn’t depend on if it’s 0.1%, or 1% because the optimal strategy depends on the difference, the relative risk in the difference by age or some other factor. So in terms of deciding what is the optimal thing to do, these models that Imperial College developed, I think were very useless.

On the effects of mishandling the pandemic…

I think there will be an enormous distrust in public health agencies. I think there will be an enormous distrust in science, in the scientific community. I think that will take decades to repair, if it can be repaired, I don’t know. I’m sure there will be consequences, political consequences as well. They’re obviously enormous public health consequences from the collateral damage, which I mentioned. I think there’s also economic consequences of these lockdowns that we’re starting to see now. So I think the consequences are profound. And maybe we are in a tipping balance in terms of whether we accept this as the standard way of doing things, which I think would be terrible, or maybe we go in a different direction, where we say, this was a fiasco, let’s make sure it doesn’t happen again.

Monday, June 20, 2022

Ukraine and the Right of All Peoples to Choose the Form of Government Under Which They Will Live

Reflecting widespread Ukrainian hatred for Russians in Nazified, Banderite Ukraine, Ukraine's Parliament just passed a law to purge the country of Russian Culture. The policy is highly divisive, since 17% of Ukraine's population are ethnic Russian and 30% are Russian speakers. 

Ukraine's hated Russians and Russphones naturally resents this policy of cultural genocide, more so the exterminationist ambition of former Ukrainian Premier, Julia Tymoshenko. Moreover, being concentrated in Eastern Ukraine and the Odessa region, they naturally want self government, which is to say independence from the hate-filled, NATO-backed, lynch mob in Kyiv. 

So what to do? Obviously, the decent solution is to honor the principles of the Atlantic Charter set forth by Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Winston Churchill at a meeting in Newfoundland on August 14, 1941.

Specifically, among other rights, the Atlantic Charter proclaimed:

the right of all peoples to choose the form of government under which they will live

In accordance with this principle, the solution to the Russia: Ukraine conflict is clear: A referendum in every Ukrainian Oblast with a large Russian-speaking population to determine whether the people wish to be ruled by Kyiv, by Moscow, or live independently under their own culturally Russian state, such as the existing sovereign Donbas republics. 

But too many idiots now rule in the West, including Bojo the serially divorced, fake Churchill, Trudeau the Canadian dictator-wannabe who thinks it wise to provide Ukraine weapons with which to kill Russians, who are, after the Americans, our closest neighbours. 

Related: 

Another Zelensky Lie Debunked - White House Says Ukraine Must Give Up Territory

SCOTT RITTER: The Fantasy of Fanaticism


The Ukraine Crisis Will Be The END of NATO w/Scott Ritter:


Czech Republic Has Exhausted Its Arms Reserves Supporting Ukraine, PM Reveals

Expansive CIA 'Stealth Network' Of Spies & Commandos Inside Ukraine

Understanding the NY Times Article on the CIA in Ukraine

John Mearsheimer's Ukraine Crystal Ball

G7 Commits To 'Indefinite' Military & Financial Support To Ukraine


Paul Craig Roberts: If the Kremlin ever Wakes Up Things Will Go Badly for the West

Col Douglas Macgregor - Ukraine Russia War Update 21.06.2022.


Sunday, June 19, 2022

Colonel Douglas McGregor: When the Lies Come Home

The American Conservative, June 17, 2922: Diogenes, one of the ancient world’s illustrious philosophers, believed that lies were the currency of politics, and those lies were the ones he sought to expose and debase. To make his point, Diogenes occasionally carried a lit lantern through the streets of Athens in the daylight. If asked why, Diogenes would say he was searching for an honest man.

Finding an honest man today in Washington, D.C., is equally challenging. Diogenes would need a Xenon Searchlight in each hand.

Still, there are brief moments of clarity inside the Washington establishment. Having lied prolifically for months to the American public about the origins and conduct of the war in Ukraine, the media are now preparing the American, British, and other Western publics for Ukraine’s military collapse. It is long overdue.

The Western media did everything in its power to give the Ukrainian defense the appearance of far greater strength than it really possessed. Careful observers noted that the same video clips of Russian tanks under attack were shown repeatedly. Local counterattacks were reported as though they were operational maneuvers.

Russian errors were exaggerated out of all proportion to their significance. Russian losses and the true extent of Ukraine’s own losses were distorted, fabricated, or simply ignored. But conditions on the battlefield changed little over time. Once Ukrainian forces immobilized themselves in static defensive positions inside urban areas and  the central Donbas, the Ukrainian position was hopeless. But this development was portrayed as failure by the Russians to gain “their objectives.”

Ground-combat forces that immobilize soldiers in prepared defenses will be identified, targeted, and destroyed from a distance. When persistent overhead intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance assets, whether manned or unmanned, are linked to precision guided-strike weapons or modern artillery systems informed by accurate targeting data, “holding ground” is fatal to any ground force. This is all the more true in Ukraine, because it was apparent from the first action that Moscow focused on the destruction of Ukrainian forces, not on the occupation of cities or the capture of Ukrainian territory west of the Dnieper River.

The result has been the piecemeal annihilation of Ukrainian forces. Only the episodic infusion of U.S. and allied weapons kept Kiev’s battered legions in the field; legions that are now dying in great numbers thanks to Washington’s proxy war.

Kiev’s war with Moscow is lost. Ukrainian forces are being bled white. Trained replacements do not exist in sufficient numbers to influence the battle, and the situation grows more desperate by the hour. No amount of U.S. and allied military aid or assistance short of direct military intervention by U.S. and NATO ground forces can change this harsh reality.

The problem today is not ceding territory and population to Moscow in Eastern Ukraine that Moscow already controls. The future of the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions along with the Donbas is decided. Moscow is also likely to secure Kharkov and Odessa, two cities that are historically Russian and Russian-speaking, as well as the territory that adjoins them. These operations will extend the conflict through the summer. The problem now is how to stop the fighting.

Whether the fighting stops in the early fall will depend on two key factors. The first involves the leadership in Kiev. Will the Zelensky government consent to the Biden program for perpetual conflict with Russia?

If the Biden administration has its way, Kiev will continue to operate as a base for the buildup of new forces poised to threaten Moscow. In practice, this means Kiev must commit national suicide by exposing the Ukrainian heartland west of the Dnieper River to massive, devastating strikes by Russia’s long-range missile and rocket forces.

Of course, these developments are not inevitable. Berlin, Paris, Rome, Budapest, Bucharest, Sofia, Vilnius, Riga, Tallin, and, yes, even Warsaw, do not have to blindly follow Washington’s lead. Europeans, like most Americans, are already peering into the abyss of an all-encompassing economic downturn that Biden’s policies are creating at home. Unlike Americans who must cope with the consequences of Biden’s ill-conceived policies, European governments can opt out of Biden’s perpetual-war plan for Ukraine.

The second factor involves Washington itself. Having poured more than $60 billion or a little more than $18 billion a month in direct or indirect transfers into a Ukrainian state that is now crumbling, the important question is, what happens to millions of Ukrainians in the rest of the country that did not flee? And where will the funds come from to rebuild Ukraine’s shattered society in a developing global economic emergency?

When inflation costs the average American household an extra $460 per month to buy the same goods and services this year as they did last year, it is quite possible that Ukraine could sink quietly beneath the waves like the Titanic without evoking much concern in the American electorate. Experienced politicians know that the American span of attention to matters beyond America’s borders is so short that an admission of defeat in Ukraine would probably have little or no immediate consequences.

However, the effects of repeated strategic failures in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and Syria are cumulative. In the 1980s, General Motors wanted to dictate the kind of automobiles Americans would buy, but American consumers had different ideas. That’s why G.M., which dominated the U.S. market for 77 years, lost its top spot to Toyota. Washington cannot dictate all outcomes, nor can Washington escape accountability for its profligate spending and having ruined American prosperity.

In November, Americans will go to the polls. The election itself will do more than test the integrity of the American electoral process. The election is also likely to ensure that Biden is remembered for his intransigence; his refusal to change course, like Herbert Hoover in 1932. Democrats will recall that their predecessors in the Democratic Party effectively ran against Hoover for more than a half century. Republicans may end up running against Joe Biden for the next 50 years.

Douglas Macgregor, Col. (ret.) is a senior fellow with The American Conservative, the former advisor to the Secretary of Defense in the Trump administration, a decorated combat veteran, and the author of five books.


Related:
Moon of Alabama: Ukraine SitRep - Lysichansk Cauldron - Sinking Morale - More Provocations

Lithuania, the Next Victim in US Program to Provoke Russia

Friday, June 17, 2022

Scott Ritter, Larry Johnson: Ukraine War June 16, 2022


An opinion survey conducted by the European Council on Foreign Relations, indicates that the majority of Europeans expressing an opinion want the Ukraine war to end now even if that means Ukraine making territorial concessions:
"Respondents who want peace as soon as possible are in the majority in all countries except Poland, insisting the war must end even if Ukraine has to make territorial concessions to Russia. Italians are the least concerned about retribution for Russia, with 52 percent of those polled just wanting an end to the conflict that has destabilized the European economy and worsened the cost of living crisis. In contrast, just 16 percent of them would see the war continue.

A similar story can be seen in Germany where 49 percent want peace compared with 16 percent who back a continuation of the war. Romania follows with a 42:23 swing, France with 41:20, and Sweden with 38:22." Source
Which is consistent with our proposal for a plebiscite across Ukraine allowing citizens to indicate whether their oblast (that is, state or province) should be ruled by Kyiv, Moscow, or should become an independent self-governing state.

This creates a tricky situation for the NATO warmongers, Bojo the Clown, Biden the Oblivious, the airhead Trudeau, plus the, as normal, insane Poles striving to get a nuclear holocaust out of this conflict, so look forward to much hate-Putin rhetoric in the days to come. 

Related: 


S. FRONT: WAR BETWEEN NATO AND RUSSIA IS INEVITABLE

globalresearch.ca: Ukraine War: Western Media Have Systematically Misrepresented Developments on the Battlefield  Well, obviously. In times of war, deceiving the public is what the media, plus Google and other public information providers, are for. 

Mainstream media survey finds no one trusts the mainstream media, or presumably, Google, Twittter, and all the other lying bastards. Question is, why are they announcing that they found out what is obvious. So they can act surprised? LOL

Wednesday, June 15, 2022

An Open Letter to Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google

Here's a letter I mailed Last July. My name and business address have been deleted. Otherwise the wording is exactly as sent. 

Thus far, no reply has been received

Google, Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy.
Mountain View, CA 94043, 
United States

Attention: Sundar Pichai, President and CEO


July 31, 2021

Dear Mr. Pichai

I should be most grateful if you would explain this:

When I do a Google search for a new post on Google's blogger platform such as:

Canspeccy + "Imagine If They Hadn’t Lied To Us For The Last 18 Months"

I get this result:

It looks like there aren't many great matches for your search
Tip Try using words that might appear on the page that you’re looking for. For example, 'cake recipes' instead of 'how to make a cake'.
Need help? Take a look at other tips for searching on Google.
But if I do the same search on Bing, I get this result:
  1. CanSpeccy: Imagine If They Hadn’t Lied To Us For The Last ...

    https://canspeccy.blogspot.com/2021/07/imagine-if-they-hadnt-lied-to...

    10 hours ago · Imagine If They Hadn’t Lied To Us For The Last 18 Months. Town Hall, July 29, 2021: Everybody wrap something around your face again even though they said you wouldn’t need to if you got vaxxed! But they didn’t lie – no, apparently a bunch of people – and not just those evil white nationalist-Christian-gun-Jesus-flag people – are ...

Is this difference between the search engines in result reflective of:
1. The relative utility of Google versus Bing?
2. Censorship of my blog by Google?
3. Some other factor?
Your comment would be much appreciated. 
Yours truly, 
........
AS OF today June 15, 2022: NO RESPONSE RECEIVED, which is a bit different from the reaction when, in the early days of Google, I wrote them to express my concern over their caching my copyright material. Then, I received a prompt, reassuring, and friendly email response from Sergey Brin. 

Tuesday, June 14, 2022

What's the Use of a Search Engine That Cannot Find What's Published On Its Own Platform: Google Versus Bing

We did a search for our latest post using the following search string:

Canspeccy: How will the Ukraine War End?

Bing came up with this, which is what you'd expect, though they were remarkably quick to index the post.

Here's Google's shot at it. Even if we put the post title in quotes, Google can't find it even though it exists on Google's own servers or in their own cloud. 

Is that pathetic or what? 

Yeah, pathetic absolutely, although when you search Google for the title of this piece they do give you a link to  21 other search engines most, perhaps all, of which do better that Google, or should that be "Gurgle" as in going down the credibility tube. 

And yet some guy at Google says their system has achieved consciousness. LOL: The consciousness of the oblivious. 

Or should we say that Google is the sanitized search engine: What you don't know cannot cause you to challenge the official narrative. In this case the message telegraphed by NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg as his message rotates 180 degrees a minute.

Which brings to mind, once again, the story about the Russian who is on an airliner heading to the US, and the American in the seat next to him asks, “So what brings you to the US?” The Russian replies, “I’m studying the American approach to propaganda.” The American says, “What propaganda?” The Russian says, “That’s what I mean.”

Postscript, August 10, 2022:

Today, a Google search for our latest post, which is entitled: 

As the World's New Number One Bully, Is China Paving the Way to World War

Returns:

As the World's New Number One Bully, Is China Paving the Way to World War

Post Postscript, August 24, 2022

But today, Google is again the search engine that can't find its own arse with both hands. Search for: 

Who Really Killed Kennedy: Joe Rogan gives Steven Pinker's Expert on "weird beliefs" a hard time on the Kennedy Assassination


and you get this:


Pretty amazing, since that item is our current post on Google's own blogger platform.

Bing, in contrast managed to find our current post and list it first out of, allegedly five billion, three hundred and twenty million results. Wow, can there really be that many Web pages devoted to the Kennedy assassination?

Some time ago we pointed out to Google's CEO, Sundar Pichai, in a polite letter that Google was either failing to retrieve our blog posts, or deliberately hiding them. We received no reply. Google is evidently run by a philistine, or maybe a CIA agent, or both.  

How Will the Ukraine War End?

 Jens Stoltenberg, head of NATO, spoke earlier this month of the Ukraine war lasting years during which he presumably looked forward to having NATO's Ukrainian proxy test out all kinds of military stuff on Russians. But now, damn it, the stinking Ruskies are winning. What to do? Well, you'd  better negotiate a peace deal and his territory while you can, Stoltenberg tells cokehead porn actor, Ze. 

Trouble is, it takes two to make a deal and Russians, as the're winning this war, will have the major say as to how things turn out. For example, they may just propose a referendum across Eastern and Southern Ukraine, where the resources are and where the Russian speakers are in the great majority. 

The choice? One imagines there'd be three options. (1) Rule by Kyiv, (2) Rule by Moscow, or (3) Independence. Who could object. It'd be democratic, just as all the simpletons in Canada flying the Ukrainian flag surely want.

As for the outcome? Option One, Rule by Kyiv, seems a non-starter. So whatever else happens? Ze will be seen to have trashed his own country, which will be reduced to a poor, land-locked rump, with a fractious multiracial society, most of which seems destined to be absorbed by Poland with some particularly non-Polish ethnic bits going to other adjoining states.

Related:

Show’s Over, Folk: Jens Stoltenberg Says Ukraine Must Surrender

"It’s possible that there are still people in the State Department trying to push this thing all the way to the end, but if the head of NATO is saying it’s time to concede to Russia, the show is over and it’s just a matter of how long it is going to take for the gears to move."

The thing is, Ze better surrender now before Russia takes more territory, or worse, before the Ukraine Armed Forces revoit, or even worse, change sides. 

Yep, hurry up Ze, go pay your respects to Putin before his guys take you away and deposit you in Moscow's Lublanka jail, pending a war crimes trial.