Ukraine and the Right of All Peoples to Choose the Form of Government Under Which They Will Live

Reflecting widespread Ukrainian hatred for Russians in Nazified, Banderite Ukraine, Ukraine's Parliament just passed a law to purge the country of Russian Culture. The policy is highly divisive, since 17% of Ukraine's population are ethnic Russian and 30% are Russian speakers. 

Ukraine's hated Russians and Russphones naturally resents this policy of cultural genocide, more so the exterminationist ambition of former Ukrainian Premier, Julia Tymoshenko. Moreover, being concentrated in Eastern Ukraine and the Odessa region, they naturally want self government, which is to say independence from the hate-filled, NATO-backed, lynch mob in Kyiv. 

So what to do? Obviously, the decent solution is to honor the principles of the Atlantic Charter set forth by Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Winston Churchill at a meeting in Newfoundland on August 14, 1941.

Specifically, among other rights, the Atlantic Charter proclaimed:

the right of all peoples to choose the form of government under which they will live

In accordance with this principle, the solution to the Russia: Ukraine conflict is clear: A referendum in every Ukrainian Oblast with a large Russian-speaking population to determine whether the people wish to be ruled by Kyiv, by Moscow, or live independently under their own culturally Russian state, such as the existing sovereign Donbas republics. 

But too many idiots now rule in the West, including Bojo the serially divorced, fake Churchill, Trudeau the Canadian dictator-wannabe who thinks it wise to provide Ukraine weapons with which to kill Russians, who are, after the Americans, our closest neighbours. 

Related: 

Another Zelensky Lie Debunked - White House Says Ukraine Must Give Up Territory

SCOTT RITTER: The Fantasy of Fanaticism

Larry Johnson: Why the Canadian Government Loves Ukrainian Nazis

The Ukraine Crisis Will Be The END of NATO w/Scott Ritter:

Czech Republic Has Exhausted Its Arms Reserves Supporting Ukraine, PM Reveals

Expansive CIA 'Stealth Network' Of Spies & Commandos Inside Ukraine

Understanding the NY Times Article on the CIA in Ukraine

John Mearsheimer's Ukraine Crystal Ball

G7 Commits To 'Indefinite' Military & Financial Support To Ukraine

Libertarian Institute: Brzezinski’s Proxy War Playbook

Paul Craig Roberts: If the Kremlin ever Wakes Up Things Will Go Badly for the West

Col Douglas Macgregor - Ukraine Russia War Update 21.06.2022.

Ukraine Forces Retreat From Encircled Severodonetsk As Russia Achieves Hold Over Luhansk Province

Russian forces encircle thousands as Ukrainian troops begin surrender

THE DARK SIDE OF THE UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT

Paul Craig Roberts: NATO Engaged in Direct Aggression Against Russia

Germany supplies Ukraine with most advanced artillery to kill Russians with

Russian Ruble Becomes World’s Best Performing Currency, Reaches Seven Year High Against Dollar

Russia says it’s ready for ‘big, colossal war’ with NATO

C.J. Hopkins: And the Germans Always Choose Nazism

Z.H.: Our New Best Friend, Nazified Ukraine, Bans Main Opposition Party, Seizes All Its Assets. Bravo

Meantime, in Canada: Trudeau’s online censorship bill charges ahead

Churchill Was a Racist for Good and Obvious Reasons

The man who defeated the Nazis is a Nazi now?

The Western world is tearing itself apart. Hatred for the dominant racial group, the Europeans, is boiling over as settler immigrants, backed by foolish or corrupt white liberal enablers, seize the opportunity created by an anti-racist hysteria, to enhance their own status, wealth and power over that of the indigenous people.

Churchill understood that if allowed to enter Europe in large numbers the alien settler, whether Muslim, Sikh, Hindu or Confucian, would seek to establish their race, their culture, their religion in place of the native peoples of Europe, their culture and their religion.

Hence, naturally, the hatred of Churchill by the immigrants that depraved or insane politicians and their demented white supporters have allowed to enter Europe's narrow borders in numbers that cannot possibly be assimilated to the native nations of Europe.

Systemic racism is the basis of every nation state. Try insisting otherwise to the Chinese, the Indians, the South Africans, or the people of any other country you care to name, and see how quickly they invite in the teaming masses from the slums of London or Glasgow, New York or Chicago.

Anti-racism is the ideology of the globalists: smash the nation state and the money power will exercise control through the corrupt global and multi-national institutions such as the UN, the WHO, NATO, the EU, and dozens of others.

In Canada, systemic racism is the very basis of the state. The stability and unity of the Canadian confederation, a creation of the British-born Sir John A. MacDonald, depends on the acquiescence of the four-hundred-year-old French colony of Quebec. Hence, respect the nation, i.e., the institutions, the language and the traditions of the French nation in North America, was  the mantra of Canada's founding fathers.

Likewise, Canada's relations with the indigenous peoples, Indian and Innuit, depends on respect for these so-called first nations, their racial integrity as reflected in their right to control who may live on native land, and their right to their own institutions of government.

Without systemic racism, no nation can stand. Anti-racists are dupes or agents of a globalist conspiracy to destroy the European nations:  a conspiracy for the genocide of the European peoples as both racial and cultural entities.

       Related     

ZH: Cornell Law Prof Says There's A "Coordinated Effort" To Have Him Fired After He Criticized Black Lives Matter
ZH: Anonymous Berkeley Professor Shreds BLM Injustice Narrative
Patrick Buchanan: Will Churchill’s Statue Be Next to Fall?
AmConMag:What Is ‘Systemic Racism,’ Really?

The underlying essence of the narrative is an increasingly brutal and incendiary polemical assault on a demographic segment of the nation–white people. They are guilty, it is said with increasing aggressiveness, for the sins of their forebears, for the racism of the past. And they must confess their guilt and seek absolution through self-abasement. Read more

Gilad Atzmon: Weimar 2020
Maverick Philosopher: 'Systemic Racism' is a Vicious, Hate-America, Leftist Myth
HideOutNow: Black Lives Matter ‘What We Believe’ Page: ‘Disrupt The Western-Prescribed Nuclear Family,’ ‘Dismantle Cisgender Privilege’
ZH: BLM Protesters Vandalize Abraham Lincoln Statue In London

Why Old People Can Be Great Leaders

Scott Adams, the creator of the Dilbert cartoon strip, has written a series of blog posts about the US Presidential election. In his current post he argues that whoever wins, Hillary or Donald, will be a bad president because they are too old for the job.

Being a bit older than Scott Adams, and older even than both Trump and Clinton, I have, perhaps, some qualification to comment on this theory, which in my view is mistaken. But before considering the question on the basis of any theoretical consideration or my personal experience of age, what of the historical evidence?

Consider Prince Mikhail Kutuzov, appointed Commander in Chief of the Russian Army as Napoleon embarked on the invasion of Russia in 1812. Aged 67, grossly overweight, within months of death from natural causes, Kutuzov ordered Russian forces to retreat in the face of the enemy, burning crops and grain stores as they went. Suffering from narcolepsy, Kutuzov had to be tied to his horse to prevent him falling off when he drowsed. Periodically, his staff officers would wake him and ask "what now," to which he would reply "continue the retreat."