Sixty Years of British Brutality, Stupidity, and Genocidal Self-Destruction

(A) Brutality

This month, UK Foreign Secretary, William Hague, admitted what has long been know that Kenyans were tortured in the 1960's during the Mau Mau uprising against British Colonial rule.

Meantime the United Nations Torture Watchdog has called on Britain to widen and speed up investigations into allegations that British forces tortured detainees in Iraq and Afghanistan and prosecute those responsible.

Which is to say that torture remains standard practice with Britain's armed forces, a fact curiously never mentioned by Britain's heroic, self-proclaimed, anti-torture "whistle-blower," and advocate of the New World Order, former UK Ambassador, Craig Murray.

(B) Stupidity

The Mismanagement of Britain, a report by a former UK Treasury official concludes that:

• [Since 1970] The UK has experienced a long run decline in its general international competitiveness – not just against the emerging economies of the Far East, but also against other advanced economies.

• There has been an increasing deficit in the UK trading account in general goods and services funded mainly by North Sea oil revenue in the1980s and reliance on the financial sector since the 1990s.

• The UK economy has become like a very large bank, with international assets and liabilities that exceed 700 per cent of GDP.

• In three periods (the late 1970s, the late 1980s, and from about 2002 to 2008), the exchange rate was allowed to appreciate even though internal price levels were rising significantly. Policy-makers appeared blind to the resulting loss of competitiveness and its impact on the manufacturing base of the economy. This seems to be the result of misguided pride in having an apparently strong currency.

• Policy makers ignored that the underlying balance of trade in goods and services, which had been flattered for a time by oil revenues, was deteriorating rapidly: and that the deficit was being covered by borrowing, and by current income, both largely dependent on the financial sector.

• Policy-makers ignored risks the financial sector might pose to the economy, and how unstable the tax revenues derived from the financial sector might be.

• Decisions were regularly taken with the primary focus of benefiting or protecting the financial sector, but which were not in the interests of the wider economy.

• Any economy which had, as the UK economy did in 2009, a public sector deficit equivalent to over 11 per cent of GDP is poorly managed.

• The economy has been weakened by the financial sector, which means that the present model of the UK economy is unlikely to cope with the next serious shock to the financial sector.

• Almost a quarter of the UK economy’s external assets (equal to 240% of the UK's GDP) consist in financial derivatives.

• Confidence among international investors in the UK economy is deteriorating.

• The current model of the UK economy is unsustainable.

• The assets and liabilities of the British economy double every nine years relative to GDP. This rate of growth cannot continue indefinitely. When this growth does stop the income of the City of London from managing this growth will drop rapidly.

• The present model of the UK economy is at severe risk of imposing substantial burdens on the UK taxpayer, and could simply collapse.

(C) Genocidal Self-Destruction

The arrival of thousands of workers from eastern Europe has had “great advantages” for Britain, says John Bercow, speaker of Britain's House of Commons.

Bilderberg 2013. The ugly faces of globalization. Source.

In remarks that have raised questions about his political neutrality, the Speaker also attacked British critics of recent trends in immigration for their “bellicose and strident tone”.

What this smarmy cunt ignores is that whereas there are about 50 million Britons, excluding about ten million recent immigrants and their descendants, there are seven billion other people on this planet, which means that for every job in Britain there is something like one Briton versus 140 other potential applicants. From which it follows that not only is every Briton whose been done out of a job by an immigrant less well qualified than the immigrant who took that job but just about every other Briton including the Speaker of the House of Commons is a damn sight less competent than the best possible immigrant who might be found to replace them.

So what is this twat Bercow saying? He's saying fuck the English, if its more profitable to employ a foreigner, that's what we're gonna let every employer, including the gigantic overbloated British Government, do.

Thing is Berky, members of the House of Commons are supposed to represent the common people of England, not the whole goddam population of the world, so what you're saying amounts to treason. which is of course, what the whole British establishment is engaged in. The end game is the abolition of not only Britain as a unified nation, but the destruction of the British people as a single group with a national identity and a cultural, religious and racial homogeneity. Which means that all the blah about diversity amounts to a concerted globalist plan to destroy human diversity, reducing all mankind to one bastard race, lacking the beautiful local adaptation and chance variation that it has acquired through tens of thousands of years of natural selection.

And with the destruction of human diversity, biological and cultural, will be the subjugation of mankind to a culture that is nothing more than a byproduct of the commercial system or a construct of the system of politically correct indoctrination designed to reduce the masses to a slave caste entirely at the disposal of the money power.

See also:

Just because it's Christian, doesn't mean it's legal: Andrew Lilico on "Is Anglicanism still the State Religion in England?"

Robert Henderson: Emma West and the State

White Rabbit Radio: Anti-Racist Genocide

Another Twat American Billionaire

San Francisco billionaire, Tom Steyer, vows to block Keystone XL pipeline

As the New Word Ordure gets underway, very rich American twats are openly asserting their intention to dictate public policy, national interest, public interest or the wishes of the majority be damned.

Tom Steyer, is the founder of Farallon Capital Management, L.L.C., a pioneer in “absolute return” investing, that produces a positive return regardless of the directions of financial markets. He evidently has the Midas touch, but why does that grant him the right to dictate public policy? Simple. Because he's incredibly rich, so his opinion counts for more than that of 300 million Americans.

For American billionaires with an axe to grind, their time has come. They can deploy as much cash as they like to elect friends and destroy foes, to  dictate policy or prohibit it, and to shape public discourse.

Naturally, the new rulers are taking good care to control the flow of money in perpetuity. Thus, reports the New American:

A former insider at the World Bank, ex-Senior Counsel Karen Hudes, says the global financial system is dominated by a small group of corrupt, power-hungry figures centered around the privately owned U.S. Federal Reserve. The network has seized control of the media to cover up its crimes, too, she explained. In an interview with The New American, Hudes said that when she tried to blow the whistle on multiple problems at the World Bank, she was fired for her efforts. Now, along with a network of fellow whistleblowers, Hudes is determined to expose and end the corruption.

Which is pretty much to be expected. The bankers and financiers have had the upper hand now for more than half a century, as this report on the Bank if International Settlements makes clear.

Before the Nazis took the first step toward conquering Czechoslovakia in the late 1930s, Czech leaders had sent a portion of their gold reserves to their account with the little-known BIS, or Bank for International Settlements, believing it would keep the loot safe.

So when, in 1939, officers of the Czech national bank were ordered under threat of death to transfer 23.1 metric tons of gold from their BIS account to the BIS account of Germany’s Reichsbank, they believed that BIS officials would recognize that the orders had been given under duress and refuse the transfer.

What they didn’t count on was that the BIS didn’t care. Montagu Norman, the governor of the Bank of England and a BIS founder, said that “political considerations must not affect BIS transactions.” And with that, the Nazis looted over 23 tons of Czech gold “without a shot being fired.”

In “Tower of Basel,” veteran journalist Adam LeBor writes that the BIS might be the most important and influential bank in the world, and yet few even know of its existence.

Founded in 1930 by Norman and Reichsbank head Hjalmar Schacht to coordinate German reparations payments from World War I, the BIS quickly came to serve as a central bank for the world’s central banks, setting key policies for global banking and eventually playing a major role in the creation of the European Union.

But this massively influential and powerful bank is also shrouded in secrecy and accountable to no one.

There are, not doubt, legitimate reasons to challenge the desirability of the Keystone pipeline. But when some very rich shit baldly states that he's gonna stop the pipeline whatever the Hell anyone else thinks, you know America ain't no democracy and that all indications to the contrary are part of a charade.

Not that billionaire bastards always get their way. Sheldon Adelson, who made his money with casinos,  spent $150 million to oust Obama from the White House and failed, which is a good joke.

But next time, Adelson threatens he'll spend twice as much, though that ain't much at all to a guy worth $22 bill. And of course, the object of the expenditure is to ensure lower taxes for billionaires, so in fact the expenditure can be considered an investment — and tax deductible.

Woolwich Killer's Brother In the Pay of MI6

Daily Mail, June 6, 2013: The younger brother of one of the men accused of murdering Drummer Lee Rigby was paid thousands of pounds by MI6 as part of spying operations in the Middle East, The Mail on Sunday has discovered.

Jeremiah Adebolajo, who uses the name Abul Jaleel, was also asked to help ‘turn’ his brother, Michael, to work for MI5, who were already aware of Michael’s close links to extremist groups.

The claims are made by the Adebolajo family and a well-placed source who contacted The Mail on Sunday.

Jeremiah Adebolajo, 26, who works as an English teacher at a university in Saudi Arabia and returned to Britain this week, is to be questioned about his brother by Scotland Yard counter-terrorism detectives today.

Government sources have already confirmed that Michael Adebolajo was known to MI5. Last week it was alleged that he rebuffed efforts by the security service to recruit him as a spy.

Michael, 28, was discharged from hospital on Friday and was yesterday charged with the murder of Drummer Rigby and attempted murder of two police officers on May 22 in Woolwich, South London.

Read more

Wales Police Order Removal of “Obey Our Laws / Respect Our Beliefs / Or Get Out of Our Country”

The Voloch Conspiracy, June 1, 2013:

So reports the South Wales Argus (thanks to Prof. Bill Poser for the link):

A NEWPORT shopkeeper has been forced by police to remove a T-shirt from his shop window because they felt it “could be seen to be inciting racial hatred.”

Matthew Taylor, 35, the owner of Taylor’s clothes store on Emlyn Walk in the city, printed up and displayed the T-shirt with the slogan: “Obey our laws, respect our beliefs or get out of our country” after Drummer Lee Rigby, 25, was killed in near Woolwich barracks in London last week.

But following a complaint from a member of the public, police came to his store and threatened to arrest him unless he removed the Tshirt from sight....

A spokeswoman for Gwent police confirmed: “We did have a call from a member of the public. We visited the shop and asked him to remove it (the T-shirt) as it could be seen to be inciting racial hatred.” ...

Newport city councillor, Majid Rahman said: “I believe in freedom of speech and defend his rights to say what he wants, but once it starts offending people then it’s a police matter and it’s up to them whether they think it’s broken any laws.”

But of course — freedom of speech is all well and good, but once it starts offending people ....

Will Only a Greek Speak for England?

By Taki Theodoracopulos

Taki's Mag, May 31, 2013: Do any of you still like the dreaded word “diversity,” which is proudly flung around by those who squirm when the great Enoch Powell’s name comes up? If anything, Powell was a prophet, and after the latest London outrage, his so-called “Rivers of Blood” speech sure comes to mind. He got it right while midgets such as Heath and Howe sold and keep on selling the country out to diversity. Can any of you imagine a time when a British soldier was unsafe wearing a military uniform in his own country? Well, yes, when the IRA was blowing up horses and soldiers off the Hyde Park barracks, but Tony Blair made nice with them and those same nice guys collect English pounds and don’t even bother to attend Parliament. This same war criminal Blair, who lied and got Britain into two unnecessary wars so he could play big international statesman alongside the idiotic George W., is out collecting millions, none of which will go toward Drummer Lee Rigby’s two-year-old son or the rest of his family.

There is something very, very wrong here. Blair lies and plots and ends up getting thousands killed and crippled, making millions out of it. Rigby follows orders, does his duty, and gets hacked to death.

Channel 4 News invited the scumbag Choudary, a self-proclaimed imam, to speak his mind, and he sure did. Not a word about the victim and the cowardly crime of hacking a defenseless man to death with knives and meat cleavers, but plenty about what victims he and his fellow Muslims are. The idiotic woman interviewing him should have jammed the microphone in his ugly bearded face, gouging his eye out; instead she politely let him get on with it. Yet as a fellow panelist pointed out, the scumbag Choudary makes more than 25,000 pounds a year on benefits alone, far more than Private Rigby ever made while risking his life for his country. But I have yet to hear one of those pompous assholes in Parliament stand up and ensure that hatemongers such as Choudary have their benefits rescinded.

Britain is paying more to those who preach hate and encourage scum to go out and kill in cold blood than their victims earn while working and making an honest living. This is such an outrage, I’m happy not to be in London as I write this. Especially not in the vicinity of those pretentious types who sprinted toward the microphones to tell us that this murder most foul will make our community stronger. Like hell it will. Not as long as filth such as Choudary are allowed to live among us.

Socrates was the greatest of philosophers because he was the first to recognize and teach that virtue is knowledge and that we cannot be good until we know what is good. Enoch Powell knew full well what England was getting into by opening her borders to Muslims and Afro-Caribbean races. He also knew that the welfare state encourages indolence, lack of initiative, and the exploitation of the public purse. It also discourages an independent mind. The two subhumans who hacked an innocent young man to death are ignoramuses. They believe the rubbish that their hate preachers instill in their mini minds—hate preachers that our elites have tolerated all these years out of fear of being called racists.

The media is in cahoots with the PC scum, which silences those who don’t think alike and uses the very same media to do its dirty work. (While a white soldier is being hacked to death in London, top golfer Sergio Garcia may lose his sponsors because he makes a joke about fried chicken and Tiger Woods.)

Racism is a slogan designed to suppress constructive thought. Suppressing free thought has always been around. In the Middle Ages it was the “H” word, as in “heretic.” Now it’s the “R” word for “racist.” That’s how they got Enoch and that’s how they’ve managed to bring Europe to the state it is in today.

I write this in the airport in Nice just after seeing the news of the murder. As I write there are riots in Sweden—race riots, but the media are not reporting the fact that African and Muslim crowds—who came to Sweden solely to collect generous benefits—are attacking the police after a knife-wielding criminal was shot. There is no greater welfare state than Sweden in the whole wide world, yet African and Muslim immigrants on benefits with medical care and free housing—plus four youth centers within a radius of a few miles in northern Stockholm—are rioting because they cannot be provided with jobs adjacent to their housing! The Swedes deserve what they’re getting for having open borders where Africa and the subcontinent are concerned. But heaven forbid if one writes that in a Swedish newspaper. In America, as over here, the newspapers and television do not report a person’s color after a crime has been committed, only what kind of baseball cap he was wearing. See what I mean by oppressing free speech?

Nothing will come from the horror in Woolwich. Pompous politicians will give pompous speeches on television. No real measures—such as immediate deportation for anyone carrying a sign that incites violence—will be taken. Hate speech in mosques will not be monitored, nor will the hate preacher be arrested and deported. None of this will happen because the lefties in the Guardian might object. Our elites are as anxious to denounce the English Defence League as they were the bloody horror perpetrated in the name of Islam by those two black hoodlums.

A lot of people ask me why I don’t live in London anymore. Now you know. PC drove me out five years ago.

Source

Van Gogh's Paintings Brought to Life

Source: Luca Agnani via wimp.com

Victims of the Boston Marathon Bombing: Real or Fake

The number of those reported killed or injured by the Boston Marathon bombs has varied, but on April 22, the Boston Globe reported 281 casualties including three dead, while on the same date, Reuters gave the slightly smaller total of 264.

But According to Professor James Tracy of Florida Atlantic university these are exorbitant figures differing sharply with the tallies provided on April 23 by the Boston Globe-owned website Boston.com, which listed only 54 bombing victims.

The 230 names added to the overall City of Boston count of April 23 appear, says Tracy, "to be phantom victims who might have sought care for modest injuries in the week following the incident but for which no records have been made publicly available."

Curiously, Tracy then quotes what he calls the "arguably excessive" eyewitness account of Roupen Bastajian, an off-duty Rhode Island State Trooper who told the Associated Press that on hearing the first detonation.

I started running toward the blast. And there were people all over the floor. We started grabbing tourniquets and started tying legs. A lot of people amputated. … At least 25 to 30 people have at least one leg missing, or an ankle missing, or two legs missing.

Since Tracy fails to explain why he calls this account "excessive," it can be taken to corroborate media reports of a large final casualty count. In particular, it establishes that there was a substantial number of serious injuries at the location of just one of the two explosions, consistent with a final count of serious plus lighter injuries resulting from both explosion mounting into the hundreds.

In sum, Tracy concludes with seeming illogic, "the photos, videos, stories and figures comprising the mediated Boston Marathon bombings do not add up and suggest elements of a manufactured event."

If, however, we turn to Tracy's MemoryHole Blog, we do find a rationale for the belief in "elements of a manufactured event." There we find a lengthy post analyzing photographic evidence suggesting that broadcast scenes of blood and mayhem are, in fact, pictures of actors, fake blood and phony heroics.

It is, therefore, a question of importance whether, as Professor Tracy contends, the injury toll from the Boston Marathon Bombings  were inflated if not entirely fictitious.

In that connection we have the testimony of Professor Michael B. Yaffe, David H. Koch Professor of Biology and Biological Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Chief Scientific Editor of the journal Science Signaling, who gave an interview to Science magazine concerning his experience on the day of the Boston Marathon Bombings.

Beside his role as a scholar, Professor Yaffe holds a position as a trauma surgeon at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, where he was summoned to attend victims of the bombings.

Concerning that day's events at the Beth Israel Medical Center, Professor Yaffe stated:

There were a total of 25 patients ... a number had traumatic amputations ... Extremities missing. Many of them had combinations of injuries: broken bones, soft tissue injuries with significant tissue loss. Some burns. A lot of ... it was pretty horrendous.

In response to a question about the role his scientific background played, professor Yaffe remarked:

When you take care of polytrauma patients you have to think integratively, because it is not just a broken bone or a laceration. You have to think about ... all the interactions between [body] systems ...

So here we have a top surgeon and a science scholar talking about the science behind the care of the Boston Marathon Bombings victims. That Professor Yaffe spoke to Science in his capacity not only as a surgeon but as a scientist is of relevance to the question of what really happened that day, because there is a rule of scientific discourse that no one is assumed to lie.

A scientist may be as dumb as a bag of hammers, or as mistaken about simple facts as it is possible to be, but it is assumed, among scientists, that another scientist talking as a scientist, however, dumb or plain wrong he may be, is honestly dumb or honestly plain wrong.

The corollary to that assumption, as with the similar assumption applied to parliamentarians, is that if a scientist speaking as a scientist is found beyond reasonable doubt to have deliberately lied about a matter of fact, he has broken a cardinal rule of his profession and is finished as a scientist.

Thus, as a former scientific person with some insight into the scientific mentality, my own conclusion is that Professor Yaffe was not lying through his teeth when he stated that the Beth Israel Hospital handled 25 Marathon Bombings victims, many seriously injured.

But the Beth Israel hospital was only one of Boston's five level-1 trauma centers that treated victims of the Marathon Bombings. In an interview with a University of British Columbia alumni magazine, Dr. Ron Walls, former Head of Emergency Medicine at UBC, now Chair of the Emergency Department at Boston's Brigham and Women's Hospital, states that 28 patients arrived for treatment at his hospital within the first hour of the emergency, three others arriving later.

Speaking of the emergency vehicle sirens, Walls said:

I've never heard anything like it. It was as if every vehicle with a siren turned its siren on and started moving at the same time.

Of the patients, Walls said,

Many had severe blast wounds to their lower bodies and partial amputations. Others had shrapnel wounds, including a penetrating neck injury that threatened the patient's ability to breath, a head injury, blown ear drums, smoke inhalations and burns. We had patients with ... large pieces of the muscle and skin and bone missing... Very bad fractures, the type of fracture you can only get with a tremendous amount of force.

Within minutes, Walls has seven operating rooms and surgical teams available to treat the wounded. None of the patients received died, a fact that Walls attributed to Marathon spectators who staunched wounds and paramedics who applied tourniquets at the bombing sites.

So, what to believe? That the reported casualty figures were "exhorbitant," or that the top surgeons at two of the five medical centers that received victims of the bombings are honest men of exceptional dedication reporting the truth.

For me the question is easily answered: whoever was behind the Boston Marathon Bombings and whatever their motivation, I accept the testimony of the Scholar, Professor Yaffe, and the distinguished former British Columbian, Dr. Ron Walls, that there were many seriously injured victims, with a total of 56 victims treated at just two of Boston's five level-1 trauma centers where victims were treated during the first hours after the bombings occurred.

So what of claims that videoed scenes of blood and mayhem were faked? It is a possibility, but to give the hypothesis credibility one needs a rationale for the fakery. But what rationale can there be for faking blood and mayhem if it has been established beyond reasonable doubt that Boston experienced the real thing that day?

Woolwich Killer: Just a Nice Muslim Lad Pushed Over the Edge By Britain's Beastly Security Service

The Independent on Sunday, reports from a café in the shadow of a mosque in an east Lancashire town, just before midday prayers, a conversation with Mr. Zubyr, brother-in-law of Michael Adebolajo, the Woolwich decapitator:

"Why did he suddenly flip?" Asked Mr. Zubyr.

As family members struggled for explanations for Mr Adebolajo's actions, they speculated that pressure from the security services to turn informer may have pushed him to act.

There you are, poor lad, he'd been pestered. It'd be enough to make anyone take to hacking off heads.

Not that the Security Services had nothing to pester the lad about.

According to The Independent on Sunday, their own  investigation has revealed that Mr Adebolajo, the decapitator:

was one of seven youths arrested by Kenyan police on suspicion of trying to join the ranks of the al-Shabaab terrorist group in Somalia.

The young men had gone on a speedboat from Lamu island to Kizingitini, Pate island, where they were arrested by police who were waiting for them after a tip off. The group he was travelling with, which included two secondary-school boys, had been radicalised during weekly visits to a mosque in Mombasa, according to police sources.

Mr. Zuybyr, himself claimed to have been pestered by MI5 about informing for them after he returned from Yemen four years ago where he went, so he claims, to learn Arabic with his new wife.

In Yemen, apparently, his innocent intentions were so much misconstrued that he was "rounded up" and interrogated at gunpoint.

Then, on his return to England, he told the Independent on Sunday,

MI5 contacted me and showed significant interest in Michael. I was harassed for a while, with constant calls from people claiming to be from the FBI."

Mr Zuybyr and his wife then left their family in London and moved to Lancashire, but so he says, MI5 still tracked him down to question him about his brother-in-law.

Wow, kudos to MI5. They managed to track a man down from London to an unidentified town in East Lancashire.

Then there's Mr Adebolajo's elder brother, Jeremiah, who went to Saudi Arabia to teach English, where he was arrested and harassed by the authorities about his brother.

 So that's the kind of place multi-racial, multi-culti, super-tolerant Britain is nowadays. Lots of folks listening to Islamic preachers who hate the West then zipping around the most terrorist infested spots in the World and then getting so deeply upset when questioned by the authorities that they feel justified in hacking off someone's head.

Only a far-right-wing extremist, racist, Nazi-loving fascist could be against swamping the homeland of the English with millions of third world nutters, maniacs and haters of Western civilization for the purpose of rubbing people's noses in multiculturalism.

Fake Terror: Britain Follows in the Path of the United States of Acting?

Pioneered by the United States of Acting on 9/11, or was it in Dallas on 11/22, 1963, phony terrorism appears set to play a greater role in driving the Brits down the road to home grown tyranny, which is to say the tyranny of people like David Cameroon, leader of the Swivel-Eyed Loon (SEL) Party who seek to transform the English masses into a deracinated, deculturated, morally depraved and intellectually stunted slave caste at the disposal of, or quite probably for disposal by, the globalist elite who see no need for the English or any other race, preferring instead the company of other billionaires.  

After Woolwich: what's coming up for the Brits.

In this analysis by Truth Frequency Radio, it is suggested that the Woolwich hoax will prove to be a prelude to the roll out of a British equivalent of the TSA: you know, blue-gloved goons feeling your balls.

Presumably the Mengele branch of the Psychiatric profession has advised the British Security Service that once people allow themselves to be sexually humiliated in public on a regular basis, all resistance to authority is undermined.

It is possible, however, that some of the apparent Woolwich beheading fakery is itself fake, which can be debunked at a later date, thereby revealing the skeptics to be nothing more than swivel-eyed loons.

Still the entire story is so wacky that it is surely mostly bunk. Consider:

Loony African converts to Islam run over a soldier in London, on Wellington St. just round the corner from the Woolwich Arsenal, then they slash him to pieces with hatchets and knives without any interference from the public who seem either oblivious or totally indifferent to what is occurring. Afterwards, folks either walk right by the killers as if public decapitations were a normal part of London life, or they stop to engage the killers, still wielding bloody knives and meat cleavers, in lengthy conversation, while filming the proceedings for the evening television news. Then, twenty-minutes later, the cops arrive and shoot the perps as they engage in a suicide attack on their armed opponents.

Is this weird or what? Either Londoners have mutated into something totally zombiefied, or this was a performance by the British counterpart of the U.S. of Acting's Crisis Actors, self-proclaimed Trained Players and Actors Making It Real.

See Also:

21st Century Wire: Britain’s MI5 Connection to Woolwich Slasher Michael Adebolajo

BBC: Woolwich murder sparks anti-Muslim backlash

Since the attack, a number of people have been charged by police after allegedly offensive messages were posted on social media websites.

These include a 22-year-old man from Lincoln, a 28-year-old man from London, a 23-year-old woman from Southsea, and a 19-year-old man from Woking.

Three men - two from Gateshead and one from Stockton - have been arrested by Northumbria Police on suspicion of posting racist tweets.

See, it's really no prob. Bring in a few million people of an alien race, a religion of intolerance and a settler mentality and, when the natives become restless, just apply more political correctness.

Squeeze his balls once or twice, and the average Englishman will shut-the-fuck up and never do another racist tweet.

The British Security State now employs an army of spies not only to watch you every minute on ten million spy cameras, but to monitor your tweets, whatever the heck a tweet may be.

Britain, the land of freedom and free speech, not.

And in fact, those fellows from Gateshead were arrested solely on suspicion of posting racist tweets.

Brilliant, really, innit. Islamic colonists kill an English soldier in cold blood, then the politically correct state has a justification for a crack down on the indigenous population.

Sadly, your native Brit. is today, such a clueless, mentally, morally, spiritually and physically poisoned creature that he takes any amount of abuse from puppets of the globalist plutocracy, whereas what they should do, obviously, is apply tar and feathers to the creature at No. 10 Downing St and all the others aspiring to reside at the same address.

BBC: Friend Says MI5 Wanted Woolwich Killer to Work For Them
Friend promptly arrested.

Daily Mirror: Police Shoot Woolwich Killers
There's nothing fake about that, then. Or is there?

Could be that MI5 prospect with the knife is just a pretty good actor, as well as quick on his feet, and the cops were firing blanks.

Either way, the geniuses running the country have managed to bring the South African race war, or a simulation of it, home to England. Well done Cameroon/Brown/Blair/Major/Thatcher and all the other seriously bizarre leaders going back to that queer bugger Ted Heath.

Before It's News: Woolwich Beheading Video – THE MAN WITH BLOOD ON HIS HANDS

Eyre International: London’s false flag even more pathetic than the Boston Bombing
TV interview with British PM: David Cameroon, Leader of the Swivel-Eyed Loon (SEL) Party, confirmed that the government is considering the beheading a terrorist incident. Cameroon rushed to London to chair an emergency meeting on the incident:

Note: Yes he and his cabal will be conjuring up some thing rather nasty that could well bring in even more “Police State Laws” or even blame it on some group in the Middle East.

NewsFromAtlantis: Woolwich Beheading: A False Flag to usher in Internet Policing?

Merovee: Fake blood?

Aangirfan: WOOLWICH: FALSE FLAG: INSIDE JOB: FAKE

CluesForum: Woolwich 'Terror Attack' - SE London, 22.5.13

I asked the on-site police officer in our school:

I bet your briefing this morning at the station was an intense one.

Officer:

I was expecting exactly that, but it was just too odd. I asked why there's no briefing, believing we'd be told which streets to be in and what to look out for, but no. Nothing. It was as if it hadn't happened. In fact, the skipper said 'it didn't happen.'

He told me he didn't recognise any of the officers on his own patch at the scene either nor any of the members of the public, despite always seeing the same people.

In the school - in class - one pupil (14) said to me: Why isn't there any mention of the naked woman? - I asked the boy what he was talking about and he said 'there was a naked woman walking up the street, just all casual-like and then the next minute, there was this smashed up car and a bloke holding a wobbly body against a wall.'

Now these kids can tell a tale, but you know when they're lying and this didn't seem to be one of those times. Another pupil said: The Somali Woolwich Boys (local gang) cut each other up and shoot each other all the time and that never makes the news.'

Smoke and mirrors. Sleight of hand. Distract the public over there, while preparing something else..

All very odd. Last day before end of term tomorrow. I think next week will bring more craziness.

But at least the Daily Mail got the message right with the following Sub-Head:

'You and your children will be next': Islamic fanatics wielding meat cleavers butcher and try to behead a British soldier, taking their war on the West to a new level of horror

James Tracy: Media Disinformation and the “Conspiracy Panic” Phenomenon

Disclose TV: WOOLWICH FALSE FLAG BULLSHIT. MASSES ARE IN A TRANCE

Sandy Hook Massacre: State Law Being Prepared in Secret to Keep Evidence From Public — Forever

Hartford Courant, May 21, 2013: The staffs of the state's top prosecutor and the governor's office have been working in secret with General Assembly leaders on legislation to withhold records related to the police investigation into the Dec. 14 Newtown elementary school massacre — including victims' photos, tapes of 911 calls, and possibly more.

The behind-the-scenes legislative effort came to light Tuesday when The Courant obtained a copy of an email by a top assistant to Chief State's Attorney Kevin Kane, Timothy J. Sugrue. Sugrue, an assistant state's attorney, discussed options considered so far, including blocking release of statements "made by a minor."

"There is complete agreement regarding photos etc., and audio tapes, although the act may allow the disclosure of audio transcripts," Sugrue wrote to Kane, two other Kane subordinates and to Danbury State's Attorney Stephen Sedensky, who is directing the investigation of the killings.
 
The bill that's being crafted has not been handled under routine legislative procedures — it hasn't gone through the committee process, which includes a public hearing, for example. Sugrue's email Tuesday indicated that a draft of the bill was being worked on by leaders in both the House and Senate, and might be ready as soon as the end of the day.

Read more 

Editorial: Why Is Newtown Investigation A Police Secret?
... Secrecy-obsessed prosecutors may seek to extend the 90-day court order sealing search warrant affidavits for the cars of shooter Adam Lanza and his mother, Nancy, as well as their Newtown home. Why should those affidavits be sealed? The Courant and several other media outlets are asking that they be made public. ...

Is David Cameron the Worst British Prime Minister Ever?

Islam to Supplant Christianity in Britain within a decade: Christianity has long been, and still is, the dominant religion in the U.K., but stats from a 2011 census study have recently emerged which suggest soon those Brits could be ditching it in favor of Islam. According to the Office for National Statistics, although 50 percent of Brits say they’re a Christian right now, aging believers and an influx of Islamic immigrants over the past decade means that experts predict there’ll be more Muslims than Christians in 10 years.

Meantime, Britain's PM and friends call Party Rank and File "Swivel-Eyed Loons."

And Cameron's big idea, gay marriage, heads for parliamentary defeat.

Breaking news: Cameron the worst British Prime Minister Ever. Even worse than Ted Heath.

And he may be the last British Prime Minister Ever.

David Cameron is judged by the British public to be weak, clueless, indecisive, out of touch and unpleasant.

Mish: Merkel pins Cameron.

Archbishop Cranmer: David Cameroon's Gay Marriage Bill is a threat to religious freedom

Cameron's biggest mistake? Being born, according to Tory MP Patrick Mercer.  

Did New World Order Critic, U.S. Congressman Larry MacDonald, Survive The 'Shootdown' Of KAL 007?

The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control.... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.
Rep. Larry McDonald

There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an institutional Anglophile network which opperates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups(Lord Milner's crew), has no aversion to cooperating with the communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the opperations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years in the early 1960s to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known."
Carroll Quigley, author of Tragedy and Hope (1966), Council on Foreign Relations member, professor and mentor to Bill Clinton at Georgetown University.

It’s a name that most people today aren’t familiar with, yet he was a man so far ahead of his time, one of those rare American individuals who could not only see what direction society and world was moving, but was courageous enough to challenge the elite power structure through his public life.


Some 30 years ago in September of 1983, Korean Airliner KAL007 was shot down in one of the most mysterious and murky episodes in modern history. Among the passengers on the ill-fated flight was as a U.S. representative from northwest Georgia’s 7th Congressional District, Congressman Lawrence Patton McDonald M.D.

As it turns out, Larry McDonald was right about so much, and possessed the foresight to see today’s globalization, WTO, the EU super state and the disintegration of the United States as a constitutional republic. Incredibly, McDonald also outlined (in the video interview below) how the US federal government would eventually move towards socialism, and restrict the Second Amendment and gun ownership in America. A visionary, to say the least.

Really Stupid English People: Or How Nations Self-Destruct

The Cross of St. George. St. George is the patron saint of England.*

The Town council of Radstock in Somerset has banned the English flag, the Cross of St. George, because, in the words of really stupid councilor and university lecturer, Eleanor Jackson, it could cause upset because it was used during the Crusades 1,000 years ago:

“My big problem is that it is offensive to some Muslims ... "My thoughts are we ought to drop it for 20 years."

The red cross was worn by English soldiers as an identification from the reign of Edward I. From 1348 and throughout the 15th century, the St. George's Cross was shown in the hoist of the Royal Standards of the Plantagenet kings of England. After the dynastic union of England and Scotland in 1603, a British flag was created by combining St George's Cross with St Andrew's Cross, the flag of Scotland.

But history be damned. The really stupid town council of Radstock in Somerset has decided that the flag should be hidden from view for at least 20 years to prevent "upset" to some Muslim immigrants.

A more intelligent decision would have been to advise Muslim immigrants to Somerset who might be offended by the symbols of the English nation to return to the Muslim countries whence they came.

The most intelligent solution would have been for other Council members to inform university lecturer Eleanor Jackson just exactly how stupid she is and then turn to some real business, assuming there is any real business in a place that can get into the news only by an exhibition of self-hating stupidity.

Oddly, or rather we should say typically of the politically correct, Radstock Council did not discuss any offense that might be caused to adherents of either the Bible, you know, the holy book of the England's state church, or the Koran, by its decision to fly the rainbow flag of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender pride movement, at “appropriate” times of the year.

But according to a Daily Telegraph report, some intelligence on the issue of the flag of St. George was expressed by local Muslims who said that the objection raised to the flag was “oversensitive.”

Meantime, the Muslim Council of Britain said England's patron saint should not be associated with “any hatred of Muslims”. Spokeswoman Nasima Begum said: "St George needs to take his rightful place as a national symbol of inclusivity rather than a symbol of hatred.”

So note, that:

 whereas the Muslims have several spokespersons to represent their interest;

and whereas the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender pride movement no doubt have multiple representatives to speak for them should their flag be demeaned;

the English have no one to speak for them other that a politically correct, self-hating twit from the university, the state's prime instrument for the corruption of youth.

That's what happens in a country run by weasels such as Blair and Brown, Clogg and Cameron, and next up, the son of an illegal immigrant Jew, Miliband, whose claims to believe that the essence of English nationalism consists in the desire to welcome many more foreign residents to be granted full citizenship including the right to demand changes in whatever they find uncongenial about England's cultural traditions and legal institutions.

When it is advantageous to the organism, individual cells of a multicellular organism may self destruct in a process known as apoptosis. The global empire relies on an analogous mechanism to destroy the power of the nation states, that might disrupt the smooth operation of the empire. It is a process of autogenocide driven by self-hatred, instigated by a treasonous elite.

The English, clearly, are well on their way to oblivion. Meantime, the Muslims wait patiently for the time when they can unfurl the crescent moon flag over England's green and pleasant land.

Why Sandy Hook Investigator, Professor James Tracy Should Not Resign

Professor James Tracy, an associate professor of communications at Florida Atlantic University, has speculated on his blog concerning the authenticity of the official account of the Sandy Hook Massacre and the Boston Marathon Bombings.

While, as he has acknowledged, not all of the arguments he has adduced as a reason for skepticism are necessarily valid, and while there is much room for debate as to the correct interpretation of the evidence considered, Professor Tracy's examination of these events falls well within the realm of legitimate public debate in a free society.

However, not all of his colleagues agree, considering it impermissible for Professor Tracy to publicly question the mainstream media and police narrative on these events. Thus, in a letter to a local newspaper, three FAU professors assert that James Tracy should resign his academic appointment.

They preface this assertion by the following claims:

First, that Professor Tracy has

infuriated the public with his conspiracy theories about the Sandy Hook massacre and is doing the same with the Boston Marathon bombing.

Second,

In each instance, he claimed that the events as we know them may not have happened and were perhaps staged using crisis actors. Despite the suffering that he has caused to victims’ families, the poor example he has set for his students and the damage that he has done to the university’s reputation, Mr. Tracy continues to blog unabated.

On the first point, the critics offer no evidence that Professor Tracy has infuriated the public, and insofar as the claim is supposed to be generally applicable, it is surely false.

On the second point, Tracy's critics offer no reason to suppose that his "conspiracy theories" are necessarily, or even probably, false, or conversely, that the events of Sandy Hook and the Boston Bombings are "as we know them," if by that expression they mean as told them by Anderson Cooper and Megyn Kelly of CNN and Dr. Wayne Carver, Connecticut Chief Medical Examiner. His offense, so his critics thus imply, is simply to have asserted what is contrary to the narrative of the mainstream media and Connecticut State officials.

But then, in conclusion, his colleagues dismiss the relevance of these points, which seem therefore to have had no purpose other than to arouse a degree of incoherent animosity toward Tracy, and assert that their colleague should resign his academic post "not because he has upset people or brought shame to the university" but "because he is not an academic," a claim for which they offer only the following:

What James Tracy does not understand is that ideas represent the end product of the intellectual process. Before they can be publicly espoused, ideas must be subjected to rigorous and intensive examination. Academics test ideas to prove their worth; commentators simply state them.

This is nonsense refuted daily, as will be evident to anyone who pays attention to the public discussion of events in the news. Academics express their ideas directly, informally and publicly in newspaper columns, blog posts, and books for the mass market every day. But few are silly enough to argue that because he writes a column in the New York Times, Paul Krugman is not an academic, or because they have publicly declared that Israel systematically discriminates against its Palestinian population, Stephen Hawking and Noam Chomsky are not academics, or because two-time Nobel prize winner Linus Pauling campaigned against above-ground nuclear weapons testing, he was not an academic.

It is not professor Tracy, but his critics who have brought shame on their university by resorting to such an illogical and fundamentally stupid public attack on a colleague.

Professor Tracy's response to his critics nicely exposes the implications of their thinking: which is that the university exists not to inculcate a commitment to the truth or a capacity for clear thinking but to instil slavish adherence to the ideology of the ruling elite as related by the news media that they control.

How the US Constitutions Became Just a Goddam Piece of Paper

By Paul Craig Roberts

Information Clearing House, May 12, 2013: Over the last several years I have watched the rise of an important new intellect on the American scene. Ron Unz, publisher of The American Conservative, has demonstrated time and again the extraordinary ability to reexamine settled issues and show that the accepted conclusion was incorrect.

One of his early achievements was to dispose of the myth of immigrant crime by demonstrating that “Hispanics have approximately the same crime rates as whites of the same age and gender.” You can imagine the uproar, but Unz won the debate.

Unz provoked and prevailed in another controversy when he concluded that Mexican-Americans have approximately the same innate intelligence as whites, with their lower IQs being due to transitory socio-economic deprivation.

He next surprised by showing the connection between the declining real value of the minimum wage (about one-third less than in the 1960s) and immigration. Americans cannot survive on one-third less minimum income than four decades ago, and the unfilled jobs are taken by Hispanics who live many to the room. A higher minimum wage, Unz pointed out, would cure the illegal immigration problem as American citizens would fill the jobs.

I wrote about some of Unz’s remarkable findings. One of my favorites is his comparison of the responsiveness of the Chinese and US governments to their publics. I found his conclusion convincing that the authoritarian one-party Chinese government was more responsive to the Chinese people than democratic two-party Washington is to the American people.

The person is rare who can take on such controversial issues in such a professional way that he wins the admiration even of his critics. In my opinion, Ron Unz is a national resource. He has established online libraries of important periodicals and magazines from the pre-Internet era, information that otherwise essentially would be lost. I have not met him, but he donates to this site and is an independent thinker free of The Matrix.

Unz’s latest article, “Our American Pravda,” http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/our-american-pravda/ is a striking account of the failure of media, regulatory, and national security organizations and subsequent coverups that leave the public deceived. Unz uses the Iraq war as one example:

Read more

New Labor Minister, Peter Mandelson: We Deliberately Screwed Our Own Supporters

Any who doubt that Western governments are puppets of the New World Order, intent on the destruction of the sovereign nation states, will find stunning refutation of that doubt in the admission by former Blairite Cabinet Minister, Lord Peter Mandelson, that the Blair and Brown governments deliberately engineered a genocidal policy of mass immigration.

New Labor he now says, sought out foreign workers: we were sending out search parties for people and encouraging them... to take up work in this country.’ .

Today, Mandelson concedes that mass immigration has meant New Labor's traditional supporters are now unable to find work.

We have to just realise... entry to the labour market of many people of non-British origin is hard for people who are finding it very difficult to find jobs, who find it hard to keep jobs.

For these little people, says Mandelson,

immigration tends to loom large in their lives and in their worlds

So now we've destroyed their communities, set them to flight from their native cities by hundreds of thousands, and just generally fucked up their lives, we have to accept, he says:

that is an inescapable fact, and we have to understand it, address it, engage with people in discussion about it.

There we are. All New Labor needs do is chat up the silly buggers who we we screwed last time they voted for us, and they'll vote to be screwed by us again.

Aren't politicians just absolute shit.

See also:

CanSpeccy: White Flight, aka, the Ethnic Cleansing of the English

Nixon, Watergate, Rockerfeller and the New World Order

By Jon Rappoport

No More Fake News, May 15, 2013: Watergate eventually became the story of two young rookie reporters who exposed and took down a president.

Try to think of another major story in your lifetime where the reporters themselves took center stage, and in the process nearly eclipsed their own work. Odd.

One of them, Bob Woodward, expanded his fame. The powers-that-be permitted him to go on and, with extraordinary access, write books criticizing future presidents. Woodward became the in-house attack dog. Mr. Limited Hangout.

The other reporter, Carl Bernstein, faded into relative obscurity. Well, he began connecting journalists to the CIA. That wasn’t a smart career move. That was, perhaps, a case of biting the hand that had fed him.

To learn why Richard Nixon was really blown out of the White House, you could begin with the infamous Nazi chemical/pharmaceutical cartel, IG Farben. The cartel that pushed Hitler over the top into power in Germany.

Read more

AIDS since 1984: No evidence for a new, viral epidemic – not even in Africa

By Peter Duesberg, et al.

IJAE, 2011: Since the discoveries of a putative AIDS virus in 1984 and of millions of asymptomatic carriers in subsequent years, no general AIDS epidemic has occurred by 2011. In 2008, however, it has been proposed that between 2000 and 2005 the new AIDS virus, now called HIV, had killed 1.8 million South Africans at a steady rate of 300,000 per year and that anti-HIV drugs could have saved 330,000 of those. Here we investigate these claims in view of the paradoxes that HIV would cause a general epidemic in Africa but not in other continents, and a steady rather than a classical bell-shaped epidemic like all other new pathogenic viruses. Surprisingly, we found that South Africa attributed only about 10,000 deaths per year to HIV between 2000 and 2005 and that the South African population had increased by 3 million between 2000 and 2005 at a steady rate of 500,000 per year. This gain was part of a monotonic growth trajectory spanning from 29 million in 1980 to 49 million in 2008. During the same time Uganda increased from 12 to 31 million, and Sub-Saharan Africa as a whole doubled from 400 to 800 million, despite high prevalence HIV. We deduce from this demographic evidence that HIV is not a new killer virus. Based on a review of the known toxicities of antiretroviral drugs we would like to draw the attention of scientists, who work in basic and clinical medical fields, including embryologists, to the need or rethinking the risk-and-benefit balance of antiretroviral drugs for pregnant women, newborn babies and all others who carry antibodies against HIV.


Read full text

About the Author:
Peter Duesberg is a member of the US National Academy of Sciences. He is an expert on retroviruses. Since he concluded that the HIV retrovirus is not the cause of AIDS but merely a harmless marker of AIDS-inducing life-styles he has been denied research funding by US agencies such as the National Institute of Health and has been denied laboratory space by the University of California, Berkeley.

Further evidence of the non-existence of a causal relationship between HIV and aids and of the role of recreational drug use and other life-style features in the causation of aids is available at: http://www.duesberg.com/.

Tony Gosling – THE NAZIS WERE NEVER DEFEATED

Not sure what to make of this guy. What he says about the postwar fate of Nazi assets is interesting — if true. But how can it be true? He names no names, yet if the Nazis funneled hundreds of billions of stolen asset into corporations formed in neutral countries during the final months of the war, these companies would now be among the largest in the world. So, which are they?

And when he starts talking about other things, you realize he is not a trustworthy source.

Available office space in Bristol in 2011 was 2.3 million square feet, not 15 million as Gosling states. And if office space is overvalued on company books, it has nothing to do with the reason Gosling states. If a company writes down its assets, that does not make it bankrupt, it merely makes it less profitable. A company is bankrupt only when it cannot pay its bills, and that can occur whether its assets are devalued or revalued.

Gosling comments about the Argentinian financial crisis are equally misleading. Funds were not taken out of depositors accounts. What happened was that US dollar accounts were converted to local currency accounts immediately after the $US/Peso peg had been abandoned. Once the peg was abandoned the Peso fell sharply in value, which meant that the purchasing power of deposits in relation to the cost of imports fell sharply.

So it's not clear to me whether Gosling is an incompetent researcher or a shill. The fact that he formerly worked for the BBC might suggest the latter.

Angirfan has more about Nazi Wealth here.

France's Stalinist Elite

By Simon Kuper

France’s “énarques” weren’t trained to succeed in the world but in central Paris


  Illustration by Luis Grañena

 The Financial times, May 10, 2013:  The French Stalinist Maurice Thorez spent the second world war in Moscow, where he called himself “Ivanov”. When France was liberated, he came home and entered government. After Charles de Gaulle stepped down as French leader in 1946, Thorez picked up one of the general’s pet projects: the creation of a school, the Ecole Nationale d’Administration, to train the new republic’s top bureaucrats. This caste, Thorez must have thought, was the “vanguard of the proletariat” that Lenin had always talked about. ENA has since produced countless members of the French political and financial elite, culminating in President François Hollande.

Elite-bashing in France dates back to the guillotine but the “énarques” and their buddies are currently at an all-time low. Within a single year, governments of both right and left have become despised. France has record unemployment. Elite scandals keep coming (most recently, around the budget minister, Jérôme Cahuzac, with his secret Swiss bank account). Something has gone horribly wrong for Thorez’s caste.

The French elite is defined by its brains. It’s largely recruited from just two rigidly selective schools: ENA and the Ecole Polytechnique (known to alumni simply as “X”). “Nowhere else in the world does the question of where you go to school so utterly determine your professional career – and the destiny of an entire nation,” writes Peter Gumbel in his new book France’s Got Talent. That’s why some elite members introduce themselves into old age as, for instance, “former pupil of the Polytechnique”.

Only 80 students a year graduate from ENA, and another 400 from the Polytechnique. They then get very demanding jobs. “They work hard. It’s not an elite that is just about relaxing,” emphasises Pierre Forthomme, an executive coach who deals with many elite members.

For decades, the elite delivered. From 1946 through 1973, France experienced its trente glorieuses, (nearly) 30 years of economic success. Even in 1990, the elite could still make great claims. It had built the first proto-internet, Minitel; installed Europe’s fastest trains; co-created the world’s fastest passenger plane, Concorde; pushed Germany into creating the euro (which the French elite then thought was the start of European unity, not the end of it); established its own independent military option that many people still took seriously; and continued to imagine it spoke an international language. Rule by brain-workers seemed to work.

Since then, things have gone horribly wrong. The sociologist Pierre Bourdieu in the 1960s began pointing out the elite’s flaw: the ruling class claimed to be a meritocracy open to bright people from anywhere but had, in fact, become a self-reproducing caste.

This is the tiniest elite of any large country. It lives in a few select arrondissements in Paris. Its children attend the same local schools, starting at age three. By their early twenties, France’s future leaders know each other. They progress from “classmates” to “caste mates”, explain the sociologists Monique Pinçon-Charlot and her husband Michel Pinçon.

Whereas an American CEO and novelist will never meet, the French political, business and cultural elites have practically fused. They meet at breakfasts, exhibition openings and dinner parties. They become friends or spouses. They give each other jobs, cover up each other’s transgressions, write rave reviews of each other’s books. (Contrast the euphoria that greets Bernard-Henri Lévy’s books in France with his reception abroad.)

The elite is the only French class that displays class solidarity, says Pinçon-Charlot. It’s tied together by shared secrets: for instance, many elite members knew about Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s peculiar bedroom practices, but they were willing to let him run for president rather than inform the peasants beyond the Parisian ring road. To paraphrase the English writer E.M. Forster, these people would rather betray their country than betray a friend. Elite members justify these mutual favours in the name of friendship. In fact (as noted by the journalist Serge Halimi and others), it’s corruption.

Read more

Boston Bombing Brings Big Brother Big Bang for the Buck

By Richard Cottrell

Progressive Press, April 22, 2013: This will be - roughly - the line that I'll be taking re Boston.

The powers that be decide on a real time live exercise to discover the mechanics. Needs to know include

- how fast can planners shut down and gain control of a very large and complex city

- how might the population react when subjected to the first total lock down America has ever witnessed (bearing in mind no such thing happened after 9/11, Madrid, London et al, so the 'lessons' learned are obviously portable)

- how ghoulish must the strike be - preferably aimed at innocents abroad enjoying themselves. Location, location, location as they say in the real estate trade.

- how willingly the population will knuckle under and comply with complete cop and military rule, no transport, emergency services, people confined to their homes under fiat order - martial law in all but name with no legit edict

- next is very important:to discover how fast you could subdue a large segment of the population and impose martial law, how much will you share with pliant and obedient sections of the media in advance and in the subsequent cover up

- using this live open-air laboratory, study and note very carefully how people in the rest of America react, not excluding foreign reactions

- gauge carefully where resistance appears to the running script of a terrorist attack and where the holes appear in the narrative that threaten blowback consequences

- what must you do to construct and re-inforce the message and the narrative that allows you to get away with hi-jacking an entire city

- how do you cope with those who start to ask hard questions

- how the temporarily imprisoned respond when the controls are lifted - indignation, civil unrest and so forth, or simple resignation and relief that it 'wasn't much worse'.

So, to summarize, as an agent of the ruling power tasked with running this experiment, what would your plan be and how exactly how would you carry it through?

My response is: the architects must be very pleased with the results. Boston fell for it and America fell for it, and so did Europe and more or less everywhere else. Mass anesthesia

In the middle of of the night my mind drifted back to the huge blast at the fertilizer plant near, of all places (co-incidentally?) Waco, the scene of a previous atrocity (and close I believe to George Bush's ranch). The pictures resemble Hiroshima after the bomb dropped. Waco, Boston overlapped. Did they just leave that explosive stuff lying around or was it set off deliberately, another grisly experiment.

By any standards this was a massive peacetime catastrophe with a lot of horrific casualties and mass devastation, but Boston won the pops when it came to coverage. I think it may have been another test run, and a very clever one in psychological terms at that.

Reactionaries of the World Unite

You have nothing to lose but 

• political correctness 


• multiculturalism


• and a government that takes most of your money to piss away on reading your email, indoctrinating you kids to despise everything you believe in, and destroying your nation as a cultural, religious and racial entity for the benefit of a deracinated plutocractic elite.

Globalization: A Themed Poster featuring Joseph de Maistre Source: Radish Mag

The image is from Radish Mag, via Jew Among You's blog.

End Welfare Now

The May 2nd collapse of the eight story Rana Plaza building in Savar, near Dhaka, Bangladesh, where the Loblaw Companies of Canada manufacture their Joe Fresh line of garments, resulted in more than eight hundred deaths and counting.

Justin Trudeau in Liberal Party ad modelling Joe Fresh
Shirt. Coincidence?

The disaster highlights the challenge faced by entrepreneurs in the West who might think about competing in the globalized market for shoes and shirts, computers and car parts: things we in the West used to make for one another, but which we now chiefly import from the sweatshops of Third World.

Consider,

Wages Pennies an hour in the Third World; legal minimum of $10.00 an hour or more in the West.

Payroll taxes Zip-all in the Third World; dollars an hour in the West, for pensions, healthcare, employment insurance, etc., etc.

Workplace health and safety standards In the Third World, forget about it. In the West, endless regulations, inspections, and real penalties for infractions of the law.

Employee motivation A job is a matter of survival in the Third World. In the West, a paycheck at minimum-wage is usually a poor alternative to unemployment pay, welfare, sick pay, etc.

The result? Western nations are rapidly destroying their industrial capacity and workforce manufacturing skills, while consigning an increasing proportion of the population to a parasitic existence that prompts the contempt of most who are productively employed and compelled to fund the welfare system.

At the same time that Western workers by the tens of millions have been consigned to the scrapheap, Western governments are intent on promoting mass Third-World immigration. The increased competition thus created for jobs that remain in the west leads to even greater unemployment among the native population, while driving up housing costs and creating the need for increased taxation to fund a massive demand for new infrastructure: schools, maternity hospitals, roads, etc.

Globalists frequently respond to complaints about immigration with comments about the jobs Canadians, Americans, the British, whoever, are too lazy or stupid to do. But the fact is that there is hardly a single job in the West for which a person in the Third World could not be found who is better qualified than the present native incumbent and who would be only too glad to exchange their Third-World wage for a First-World wage, minimum or otherwise, or even a below minimum wage job in the underground economy of the US, Canada or Britain.

So the globalist policy of mass immigration to the West amounts to a genocidal eugenics policy, which in combination with vicious cultural policies and propaganda-as-education, demoralizes and undermines the fertility of the indigenous population brought up with a belief in the rights of man, freedom of speech, habeus corpus and all rest of that Western tradition so obnoxious to plutocratic governance. The result is the progressive replacement of the indigenous peoples of Europe by people from elsewhere, who are used to tyranny and better know their place.

Astonishingly, most of the evils of current Western social policy would be remedied by the simple measure of abolishing welfare as we know it.

Abolition of welfare would have two important and immediate consequences.

First, the huge resources consumed directly by welfare programs would be saved. In addition, the huge cost of welfare administration would be eliminated and a substantial proportion of the educated middle class engaged in the welfare bureaucracy could get a real job.

Second, an end to welfare would necessitate an end to mass unemployment, since without either work or welfare, an unemployed populace would seek immediate bloody revolution.

Eliminating welfare, in other words, means achieving full employment, while ensuring that every employed person has an income sufficient to live on. That means an income far greater in the West than in the Third World where the cost of living for the mass of people is much lower than in the West.

Mass unemployment in the West can be eliminated by two simple measures.

First, abolition of minimum wage laws. This would make virtually everyone worth employing at some legally permissible wage.

Second, extension of the income tax table into negative values at the bottom end of the scale, thus providing every employed person a basic amount of income.

A question that this proposal most often raises is: Can the employer then pay their employees effectively nothing knowing that the government is paying them a living wage?

To which the answer is "no." There would be a free market in labor. Thus, as long as the productivity of labor were more than zero, entrepreneurs would bid up the price of labor to approaching it's value, as they do now in the case of labor for which they pay more than the minimum wage.

The proposal would simply enable those whose labor is worth less than the minimum wage to obtain work in the face of competition from Bangladeshis and others in the Third World who work for pennies an hour in collapsible factories.

And, by paying welfare, EI and other benefits to the unemployed, Western governments, in fact,already subsidize the offshoring of production, which forces native citizens into idleness.

Providing work for the unemployed will achieve four things.

First, an increase in the GDP of Western nations. In countries such as Spain where over one quarter of the workforce is idle, the increase achieved by putting the unemployed back to work, albeit in low productivity/low wage jobs, would significantly boost the wealth of the nation.

Second, an increase in the workplace skills of the least employable members of the Western workforce.

Third, an incentive for Western companies to engage in manufacturing R and D, thereby enhancing Western productivity.

Fourth, an end to the destruction through mass immigration of the Western nations as unique racial and cultural entities.

See also:

The Globalist Agenda: They Plan the Destruction of Your Country Too

The Globalist Agenda: They Plan the Destruction of Your Country Too

Aangirfan asserts that "The West is now wrecking various Moslem countries, by causing ethnic and religious conflicts," a contention with which we agree.

 But even more remarkable is that the West is in the process of wrecking itself too.

The explanation for that is that the West is the tool of a deracinated globalist plutocracy that includes Chinese, Russian, Muslim and African billionaires, who view the sovereign nation state as the greatest threat to their wealth and power.

• The reasons that billionaires hate independent states are obvious.


• Sovereign states impose taxes. 


• Sovereign states protect their industrial base by imposing trade restrictions that prevent the free flow of capital, labor and goods to maximize the profits and minimize the taxes of globalized corporations.


• Sovereign states impose workplace health and safety standards to protect the wellbeing of their workforce. 


• Sovereign states impose environmental regulations to preserve air and water quality for the good of both man and wildlife. 


• Sovereign states have armed forces, including rockets and nukes, with which at any moment they might reduce the world to a pile of rubble and incinerated billionaires.

What to do?

Destroy the nation state, obviously.

How?

Buy the leadership.

This is a long established tradition under the Western parliamentary system of government and its derivatives such as the Congress of the United States. Stupid leaders take bribes. Sensible leaders accept lucrative bank directorships and consultancies granted in appreciation of past services, once they have left office.

The result?

Western leadership is a puppet show, with various side shows such as Sandy Hook, the supposed slaughter of Osama bin Laden, the London Tube bombings, 9/11 to keep the proletariat in line.

Among the nation states, Moslem countries with huge oil resources are naturally a prime globalist target.

Iraq, with its secular drive for industrial development and military power was thus inevitably a prime target. Egypt with its great human resources, Libya with its ambitious Gaddafi dictatorship, were naturally high on the list of nations targeted for destruction.

The theocratic Islamic states are targeted, since their system of government is not so easily transformed into a paid puppet show  as the democracies of the West.

But the Western states are by no means immune from the process of disintegration.

In Europe, genocide of the indigenous peoples is well underway, and, with the destruction of the ancient national identities and the dissolution of Christendom, they will soon lose all internal coherence.

At that point, they will break up into pseudo-national trivialities such as the Republic of Ireland, the Republic of Scotland, the Republic of Brittany, etc., etc., each readily subject to manipulation and control by shadowy, undemocratic bureaucracies such as the EU, the UN and the WTO, all in turn, subordinate to the hidden powers of bribery and corruption.

OBAMA GAVE THE STAND DOWN ORDER ON BENGHAZI

“After Defense Secretary Leon Panetta made the following statement about not deploying troops without the intel that says its a good idea, career military people began talking. What they had to say suggests someone in Washington needs to be fired, and someone else needs to be impeached. The quote attributed to Panetta was:

“…the basic principle is that you don’t deploy forces into harm’s way without knowing what’s going on, without having some real-time information about taking place. And, as a result of not having that kind of information, the commander who was on the ground in that area, Gen. Ham, Gen. Dempsey and I felt very strongly that we could not put forces at risk in that situation.”

However, when Gen. Carter Ham, head of Africom, received the same emails that Panetta, Clinton and Obama received, he assembled a rapid response unit and informed Panetta he was ready to go. Ham was ordered to stand down. He told Panetta to screw himself, telling the Secretary that he was sending his men in. Less than one minute later Lt. Gen. David Rodriquez told Ham—his boss—he had just been relieved of his command because he refused to obey a direct order from the Commander-in-Chief. Obama then appointed Rodriguez as the new head of Africom. Now you know precisely who gave the order to “stand down” that resulted in the sacrificial death of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, IT Specialist Sean Smith and former Navy Seals Glenn Doherty and Tyrone Woods for “political points.”

The Obama Administration also lied when it said that Doherty and Woods were assigned to personally protect Ambassador Stevens in Benghazi. That was a blatant fabrication. The former Seals, attached to the CIA, refused the White House order to “stand down.” They went to the Consulate and defended the mission with their lives.

More here 

See also:

White House Benghazi Cover Up Exposed
 
Lt. General Mclnerney: “THERE IS ONLY ONE PERSON WHO CAN SAY STAND DOWN, AND THAT’S THE PRESIDENT”

Navy SEAL Team 6 families Hold US Responsible for Sons' Deaths

The National Press Club, May 9, 2013: (Washington, D.C.). Three families of Navy SEAL Team VI special forces servicemen, along with one family of an Army National Guardsman, will appear at a press conference on May 9, 2013, to disclose never before revealed information about how and why their sons along with 26 others died in a fatal helicopter crash in Afghanistan on August 6, 2011, just a few months after the successful raid on the compound of Osama Bin Laden that resulted in the master terrorist's death.

Accompanying the families of these dead Navy SEAL Team VI special operations servicemen will be retired military experts verifying their accounts of how and why the government is as much responsible for the deaths of their sons as is the Taliban.

The areas of inquiry at the press conference will include but not be limited to:

• How President Obama and Vice President Biden, having disclosed on May 4, 2011, that Navy Seal Team VI carried out the successful raid on Bin Laden’s compound resulting in the master terrorist’s death, put a retaliatory target on the backs of the fallen heroes.


• How and why high-level military officials sent these Navy SEAL Team VI heroes into battle without special operations aviation and proper air support.


• How and why middle-level military brass carries out too many ill-prepared missions to boost their standing with top-level military brass and the Commander-in-Chief in order that they can be promoted.


• How the military restricts special operations servicemen and others from engaging in timely return fire when fired upon by the Taliban and other terrorist groups and interests, thus jeopardizing the servicemen’s lives.


• How and why the denial of requested pre-assault fire may have contributed to the shoot down of the Navy SEAL Team VI helicopter and the death of these special operations servicemen.


• How Afghani forces accompanying the Navy SEAL Team VI servicemen on the helicopter were not properly vetted and how they possibly disclosed classified information to the Taliban about the mission, resulting in the shoot down of the helicopter.


• How military brass, while prohibiting any mention of a Judeo-Christian God, invited a Muslim cleric to the funeral for the fallen Navy SEAL Team VI heroes who disparaged in Arabic the memory of these servicemen by damning them as infidels to Allah. A video of the Muslim cleric’s “prayer” will be shown with a certified translation.

"This press conference takes on special significance given that our government has over the last twelve years since September 11th committed brave American servicemen to wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that, in large part as a result of politics, were poorly conceived of and implemented, resulting in the deaths of thousands and the maiming of tens of thousands of our brave heroes. To make matters even worse, America has effectively lost these wars," stated Larry Klayman, legal counsel for the families.

See also: 

CanSpeccy: US Navy SEALs: Two Helicopters