Showing posts with label Covid. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Covid. Show all posts

Monday, November 22, 2021

Covid Lies From the Mouths of Politicians: "Within Months, All Germans Will Be Vaccinated, Cured or Dead" — German Health Minister

When Jens Spahn, Germany's Minister of Health, said that, within months, all Germans will be "vaccinated, cured, or dead," his objective, presumably, was to so terrify the unvaxxed that they would get the jab. 

However, the statement of this latter-day Goebbels embodies a lie, three lies in fact. 

First: 

Conveyed by implication, the Minister's first lie is that the "vaccinated" are a distinct category from the "cured" and the "dead".  This however is not so.  British data show that the vaccinated are more, not less, likely than the unvaccinated to catch Covid. That means that the vaccinated must, in greater numbers than the unvaccinated, be joining the community of the "cured" or the "dead".

In fact, among adults over the age of 29, the British data show that the Covid case rate, i.e., cases percent, for the vaccinated is more than twice that for the unvaccinated.

Second:

 As for the division between the "cured" and the "dead," it is true, again according to British data (see Page 15), that mortality from Covid is higher among the unvaccinated that the vaccinated, but contrary to the implication of the minister's statement, the risk of death from Covid is not great, rather, it is barely higher than that from the flu. 

Among under 18's, the recorded death rate per 100,000 was zero for both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. 

In the 18- to 60-year-old category, the death rate for the four-week period to Week 42 was 2.8 in 100,000 (0.0028%) among the unvaccinated, versus 0.48 in 100,000 (0.00048%) among the vaccinated. 

For the over 60's the recorded overall mortality was 63 per 100,000 (0.063%) among the vaccinated versus 176 per 100,000 (0.176%) among the unvaccinated.

For comparison, in 2019, deaths in the UK involving flu and pneumonia averaged 8.5 per 100,000  (0.0085%) per four-week period, which is four times the death rate from Covid among unvaccinated people between the ages of 18 and 60 recorded during the four weeks to October 24, 2021. 

Third:

The third lie implied by the German "Health" Minister's statement is that the progress of Covid through the population is a bad thing that must be halted. In reality, Covid is beyond containment. All attempts,  however draconian, to stop the spread of this highly infectious virus have failed. That is true even in China, where outbreaks are ongoing. Covid has become endemic, meaning that it is now widespread and ineradicable by means of any feasible public health measures.

Now, therefore, the objective of public policy should be to allow the acquisition of herd immunity through naturally acquired infection among the majority of the population, although those wishing to obtain whatever benefit there may be from vaccination should certainly be free to do so. The resultant more widespread immunity from infection, already acquired by a large fraction of the world's population, will prove to be both more robust and more durable than the short-lived,  narrow-spectrum immunity provided by the so-called vaccines.

 With the attainment of herd immunity, the virus will reach a stage of so-called endemic equilibrium, meaning that it will remain in circulation, but at a sub-epidemic rate, its spread limited by naturally acquired immunity throughout the population. 

Immunity from the so-called vaccines will not be a factor in ending the Covid pandemic since we have seen from the UK data that the vaccines do not stop, but rather promote, viral spread. 

The vaccines now available are of value, at best, in moderating the severity of disease. Moreover, there is a cost to the use of the vaccines, that being an increase in the number and virulence of newly created Covid variants. 

Far from inducing a general immune system response, the vaccines induce merely the production of antibodies to just one of the virus's 18 protein components, namely the spike protein of the original Wuhan Covid strain. Thus, any mutation in the Covid spike protein that evades neutralization by vaccine-induced antibodies makes the vaccinated person a potential incubator for a novel Covid variant. 

This phenomenon of vaccine-facilitated immune escape means that the ongoing and world-wide drive to achieve universal vaccination with the present generation of "leaky" Covid vaccines may be about to create a global catastrophe. Specifically, the vaccines may be giving rise to an array of Covid variants more deadly than the original virus. Thus, to quote an article from The Lancet:

If substantial immune evasion occurs, current vaccines are likely to still offer some benefit to individuals. At the population level, however, they could induce viral selection and escape, making the prospect of achieving herd immunity increasingly remote.
That is a truly terrifying prospect: a world ravaged by multiple Covid variants, against which the achievement of population-wide natural immunity has been made virtually unattainable. 

Related:


“This is Called Projection – Dr. Fauci Gets Gold Star for Lying” – mRNA Inventor Dr. Robert Malone Blames Fauci and US Covid Team of 500,000 Unnecessary Deaths

Dr. Robert Malone: Children Who Have Had COVID Are at Higher Risk of Adverse Effects If You Vaccinate Them


Former Pro Calls For "Investigation" After Another Soccer Player Suddenly Collapses


Wednesday, November 3, 2021

SARS–CoV–2 Spike Protein Impairs DNA Damage Repair — Or How Covid-19 Was Designed to Kill You?

 Here's the paper in the journal Viruses:

SARS–CoV–2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair ...

Hui Jiang 1,2,* and-Fang Mei 2

1. Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner–Gren Institute, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden

2. Department of Clinical Microbiology, Virology, Umeå University, SE-90185 Umeå, Sweden

.... Here, by using an in vitro cell line, we report that the SARS–CoV–2 spike protein significantly inhibits DNA damage repair .... Mechanistically, we found that the spike protein localizes in the nucleus and inhibits DNA damage repair by impeding key DNA repair protein BRCA1 and 53BP1 recruitment to the damage site. Our findings reveal a potential molecular mechanism by which the spike protein might impede adaptive immunity and underscore the potential side effects of full-length spike-based vaccines. ...


So note:

1. It's the spike protein they want to inject you with.

2. The spike protein can get into the nucleus of any cell and disrupt the machinery that prevents the genome from getting scrambled.

3. Scramble your genome and your done. 

But you still want your kid vaxxed? 

Go ahead.


Acknowledgement:
Above links via WhatReallyHappened

Related:



'Falsified Data': Pfizer Vaccine Trial Had Major Flaws, Whistleblower Tells Peer-Reviewed Journal

PROFS: MARTIN KULLDORFF AND JAY BHATTACHARYA: How Fauci Fooled America:
In the UK 85% of Covid-19 deaths are among the Vaccinated, Child deaths have risen by 83% since they were offered the jab, the Covid-19 Vaccines have negative effectiveness as low as -132%

Tuesday, October 26, 2021

Why the US Center for Disease Control Is Lying About Natural Covid Immunity

Source
Michael Leunig, creator of this cartoon illustrating the plight of the unvaxxed, has been axed from his prime spot in The Age newspaper

By Aaron Kheriaty 

Human Flourishing, October 23, 2021: The science on the efficacy and durability of natural immunity is now overwhelming. Yet the CDC continues to recommend lifting restrictions on the vaccinated but not those who have recovered from Covid and have superior natural immunity. Vaccine mandates across the country likewise ignore natural immunity simply because the CDC is ignoring it. Those promulgating vaccine mandates feel no need to actually address the science on this question; instead, they simply fall back on the CDC’s recommendation that everyone—regardless of immunity status—get vaccinated.

There are many political reasons the CDC continues to ignore the scientific evidence on this issue. Here is a sampling of of these reasons, which are neither compelling nor grounded in scientific findings:

Public health officials worry that acknowledging natural immunity will lead people to deliberately try to get infected with Covid rather than getting vaccinated. The obvious response to this worry is that the natural immunity question is not about whether people should try to acquire natural immunity by deliberately getting infected; nobody is suggesting this. It is about the level of immunity afforded to those who have already recovered from Covid as compared to immunity from the vaccine.

Public health officials worry that establishing whether a potential vaccine recipient has already had Covid is too inefficient and cumbersome: officials downplay anything that might slow the efficiency of vaccination campaigns or complicate the simplistic “needle in every arm” public messaging. The response to this worry is likewise straightforward. Vaccination centers need not take on the burden of testing prior to vaccination; simply place the burden of proof on the vaccine recipients. Some people with prior infection may still want the vaccine; as long as they are provided accurate information regarding risks and benefits of vaccines in this population, they are free to get vaccinated. For those with natural immunity who consider their individual risks and benefits and decide to decline vaccination, policies can specify that it’s their responsibility to establish prior immunity. Simply provide the option to them of presenting previous positive PCR test results, or obtaining antibody testing or a T-cell test (which remains positive after antibodies inevitably decline). While there are many other problems with vaccine passports, if officials insist upon them, at the very least these should be immunity passports rather than vaccine passports: this model has has already been implemented in several European countries.

Public health officials worry that acknowledging natural immunity will amount to admitting the failure of their prior policies, which were implemented to slow or halt the spread of the virus. The two most basic numbers in immunology are incidence and prevalence: the former designates the rate of new cases over a given period of time, whereas the latter designates the rate of overall cases for a given period of time. Once the CDC acknowledges natural immunity, the obvious question is then about prevalence: how many Americans have already been infected with Covid since the pandemic began? That 20 months into the pandemic we don’t have an answer to this most basic question is astonishing, since it could easily be answered by randomly sampled population-based T-cell testing, or antibody testing sampled sequentially in a cohort every few months. If the CDC got back to epidemiological basics and finally did these essential studies, most scientists estimate that somewhere between 50% and 60% of the population will turn out to have natural immunity, including many who were vaccinated (which artificially elevates estimates of vaccine efficacy, by the way). In the mind of officials who never want to admit that they may have been wrong, this will suggest that—despite draconian lockdowns, social distancing, masking, scrubbing of surfaces, etc.—the virus nevertheless did what viruses do: over half of Americans got infected anyways. Self-interested public health agencies will see this as bad news. (The silver lining is that, of this huge number of people who have been infected with Covid, 99.8% will have survived, including 99.9996% of those under 50.)

There are other political and financial considerations unduly influencing public policy agencies like the CDC on Covid policies, which I will explore in later posts. Against these non-scientific roadblocks, which have little to do with public health and sound policymaking, how can responsible scientists help move the needle on the CDC’s position? Can legal pressure be applied to require the CDC—in an open and publicly transparent manner—to examine the science on natural immunity and give credible reasons for their policies on this issue?

In fact, precisely such legal pressure is already being applied, by a group of academic physicians and researchers (including yours truly) with the help of my team of lawyers at Siri & Glimstad. In my next post for subscribers, I will recount what has transpired with these efforts over the last several months and bring you up-to-date on where we are going next. This next post will also include links to the best summaries on the science of natural immunity, which we have submitted to the CDC. Stay tuned, and if you have not yet done so, consider subscribing for access.

 Related:

FDA Adviser Explains Why He Abstained From Vote on Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine for Young Children The abstainer, Dr. Michael Kurilla, explained his abstension saying “A ‘no’ vote would have been misconstrued as my opinion about the vaccine”. 

What a pathetic excuse for not voting in accordance with his belief that the Covid jab is not in the best interests of children. 


Idaho pathologist and owner and operator of a diagnostics lab, reports a ‘20 times increase’ of cancer in vaccinated patients

Killing Kids with the Vax for Fun and Profit

YouTube executive boasts about deleting over 1 million videos for “COVID misinformation”


Sunday, October 24, 2021

The Medical Bullshit That Provides the Cover-up for the Overthrow of a Free Society

By Blaise Edwards, M.D.

American Thinker, October 21, 2021: Doctors need to be called out.  From early in the pandemic, it was like a mass hypnosis or forgetfulness of everything we had learned in medical school.  Immune system knowledge was shelved and replaced by government dictates.  The thought of early outpatient treatment with “off label” drugs that could modulate the immune system was forbidden.  We essentially told patients that they had to go home and wait until they were sick enough to be hospitalized, then treatment would begin.  Imagine telling all diabetics that there is no metformin, Glucophage, or insulin.  Would we really wait until patients are in diabetic ketoacidosis, and then treat them only at the hospital?  It is medical malfeasance of a grand scale.

We physicians gave up our training and our reasonable medical thought process.  The reasons are multiple.  First, it was the easy way out.  Second, many of us are employed and fear reprisal.  Third, despite what the public thinks, we physicians are not bold leaders, we tend to be sheep, and are afraid of having an entire institution ostracize us or our colleagues to think us crazy.

As we got to the point of vaccine rollout, doctors were not using the scientific method, questioning and challenging prevailing hypotheses.  They kept their heads down, closed clinics, converted to telemedicine, and pushed only the jab.

I had conversations with doctors who are supposed experts in virology and immunology denying the lasting immunity of natural infection.  Conversations about natural immunity:

“I have antibodies.”

“But they will wane.”

“But I have memory cells.”

Dumbfounded look. 

Really, are these the leaders we want?

Other conversations about the safety of vaccines:

“The vaccine is safe.”

“No, we would have shut down any trial in the past after even 100 deaths.”

“This is more serious.”

“But the survival rate is about 99.6%.”

“It's killing people.”

“So is the vaccine”

“You can’t believe VAERS.”

“It was set up to help protect the public, and if anything, it is underreporting side effects.”

“You’re a conspiracy theorist.”

Or conversations about early treatment

“You must get the vaccine, it is the only “proven” treatment, there are no other treatments.”

“Really, ivermectin has eradicated COVID in India, parts of Mexico, Japan….”

“It is a horse dewormer.”

“It won a Nobel Prize in medicine, is a WHO essential drug, and has been around for decades with a great safety profile.”

“No, only the vaccine works.”

“But it is failing”

           “You are a denier and a conspiracy theorist.”

           “Sigh….”

Lately, it has been all about getting 100% of the population jabbed.  For what reason?  I am not sure, and some of the more detailed and investigated theories scare me.  I shudder to think.  But last year’s heroes are being labeled selfish and villainous for not getting the vaccine.  Hospital systems have abandoned their community’s health and ignored early successful outpatient treatment in favor of huge government subsidies for inpatient and ICU treatment.  The success of these treatments was not great, but that is another article.  Now we have the same hospital systems turning their backs on their own employees.  Basically, health providers have a choice, get shot, or get fired.  How does that help?  Both vaxxed and unvaxxed can spread the virus, so it doesn’t help anyone.  It only helps the hospital to get more government money by meeting quotas.

Read more

Related:

Arrest the Puppy Killer Fauci

James Corbett Interview: Iain Davis Dissects the Pseudopandemic

Canadian vaccine scientist admits toxic spike-protein vaccines a catastrophic  mistake -- Try telling that to Prime Minister Justinsensible Trudeau

The global population is roughly 7.8 billion people, if 10% have been infected that is 780 million cases. The global death toll currently attributed to Sars-Cov-2 infections is 1,061,539.

That’s an infection fatality rate of roughly or 0.14%. Right in line with seasonal flu and the predictions of many experts from all around the world.

0.14% is over 24 times LOWER than the WHO’s “provisional figure” of3.4% back in March. This figure was used in the models which were used to justify lockdowns and other draconian policies.

In fact, given the over-reporting of alleged Covid deaths, the IFR is likely even lower than 0.14%, and could show Covid to be much less dangerous than flu.

None of the mainstream press picked up on this. Though many outlets reported Dr Ryan’s words, they all attempted to make it a scary headline and spread more panic.

Apparently neither they, nor the WHO, were capable of doing the simple maths that shows us this is good news. And that the Covid sceptics have been right all along.

Ten red flags in the FDA's risk-benefit analysis of Pfizer's EUA application to inject American children 5 to 11 with its mRNA product

Acknowledgement:
As always, thanks to WRH and others listed at the top right for story links. 

Saturday, October 23, 2021

Justin Trudeau's Prison Camp Canada: Why Is Canada's Prime Minister Acting Like a Moronic Arse Hole?

Trudeau: You can’t leave Canada if you’re Unvaccinated….

Trudeau aims to make "vaccination" mandatory by locking down the "unvaccinated" for ever. Prevented not only from leaving the country, but likely eventually locked in their own homes, denied access to the grocery store, schools and workplaces. 

 Why? 

Supposedly because the "unvaccinated" are a risk to the health and safety of the "vaccinated." 

But conclusive evidence refutes the claim. 

1. The "vaccinated" are susceptible to Covid infection. 

2. The "vaccinated" who are infected carry as high a viral load as the "unvaccinated" -- that's a statement from Rochelle Walinsky, Director of the US Center for Disease Control. 

3. "Increases in Covid cases are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States"-- that's the title of a peer-reviewed journal article in the European Journal of Epidemiology.

4. Millions of Canadians have superior immunity to Covid than the "vaccinated" because they've had Covid and thus acquired broad-spectrum Covid immunity, not just a bunch of variant-specific antibodies. Antibodies, that is, that  are of limited effectiveness against new Covid variants and which dissipate rapidly, thus necessitating a further shots within months to maintain whatever feeble Covid protection they are supposed to provide. 

Many so-called "anti-vaxxers" are in fact those who've had Covid and need no fucking jab, Trudeau, you retarded bastard. 

As Yale epidemiologist, Dr. Harvey Risch, explains: It's the "unvaccinated" who need protection from the "vaccinated."

What Canada has is a tyranny run by a self-declared dictatorship wannabe holding power with the support of less than one third of the population. 

Will intelligent, properly informed Canadians remain supine, subordinate, sycophantic, under the heel of this ridiculous prime ministerial jerk? 

We'll soon know, as millions of "unvaccinated" Canadians decide such questions as these:

Will "unvaccinated" students now in Canada but registered for study at a US or other foreign University, withdraw from their course of study?

Will "unvaccinated" Canadian students now abroad, accept that it is right and reasonable that they have been made an exile through the action of their own government.

Will unvaccinated persons whose business or profession requires them to travel abroad, abandon their career?

Let no one doubt, it was in fear of the response to such questions as these that Canada's blackface-loving Mussolini called an election during the Covid pandemic. 

It was to strengthen his hand against what he knew would be a popular backlash, when his stupid tyrannical intentions became known. 

But why Trudeau has so crassly declared the death of Canada as a free country, we have no explanation other than sheer stupidity. But we invite alternative suggestions.

Postscript: 
Does anyone know what would be the Canadian equivalent to "Let's go Brandon"? A lifetime free subscription to this blog for the best suggestion.

Related:

That's not your child to advise, slave. He belongs to the state.

National Post — Raymond de Souza: Overreach on COVID measures about power This is an excellent analysis demonstrating that Canada, a supposed constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy, is governed neither by its constitution nor its parliament. Rather we are ruled by bureaucrats and judges conforming to the dictates of unscrupulous politicians representing a remarkably small proportion of the population.

Wednesday, October 20, 2021

Clinical Pathologist: The Spike Protein, Which Is the Active Vax Agent, Causes Irreversible Tissue Damage


Related:

NIH Admits Funding Gain-Of-Function COVID Experiments; Gives EcoHealth Five Days To Report Data:
"A top NIH official admitted in a Wednesday letter that the US-funded so-called "gain-of-function" research in Wuhan, China - and that the US nonprofit which conducted it, EcoHealth Alliance - led by the controversial Peter Daszak, "failed to report" that they had created a chimeric bat coronavirus which could infect humans. ..."

Official Government Docs Comparison Suggests “Fully Vaccinated” Are Developing AIDS (Sounds like insane fabrication. Or Armageddon has arrived.)

 Top scientists release study warning against COVID-19 vaccines, demand an immediate end to vaccinations


Why the Media Doesn't Question the Vax:

Dozens of workers at Los Alamos nuclear lab sue over vaccine mandate

Covid Deaths Before and After Vaccination Programs:

Natural Versus Vaccine Immunity:

Wednesday, September 15, 2021

Former Pfizer Inc. Vice President and Respiratory Disease Expert: Covid was created as a pretext for mass murder by fake vaccine injection

Via Off Guardian:
COVID19/11 – Mike Yeadon:

Episode Eight of Narratives Intertwined

Consistent with which is this article at UnHerd:

Covid safetyism has gone mad

Gone mad meaning that Covid policy bears no sensible relation to the public interest and thus, presumably, serves some other purpose: perhaps, as Mike Yeadon suggests, Bill Gates's desire for planetary depopulation. But what think those who visit this blog — almost ten thousand of them so far this month, but all beside a couple of trolls, thus far silent. 

Friday, September 10, 2021

Why Canada's War on Covid Is a Disaster That We Are Certain to Lose

Lockdowns, business closures, ballooning public debt and deficits, interrupted schooling, adverse vaccine events including death — over 12, 000 in the Province of Ontario alone: these are among the many costs of the war on Covid. 

What have been the benefits? 

No doubt in the early stages of the epidemic some Covid infections, and hence deaths, were avoided by measures to "flatten the curve." Because of the costs, however, such draconian measures could not be maintained indefinitely. Rather, they were imposed to limit viral spread until the many novel so-called vaccines for Covid then under development became available for use, albeit without the usual multi-year-long human and animal safety testing. 

Beginning in January of this year, "vaccines" have been rapidly deployed in many countries. The results, however, have been disappointing. In Israel, for example, one of the first countries to achieve majority "vaccinated" status, vaccine efficacy (in preventing illness, not infection) declined from over 90% initially to a percentage in the low twenties after six months. The decline in effectiveness means that maintenance of high immunity will require "booster" shots at intervals of just a few months.

In the United States, the Center for Disease Control reported that the "vaccinated" are not protected from infection and may carry as heavy a viral load as the un-"vaccinated". The "vaccines" thus fail to provide immunity from infection or to prevent viral spread, although they apparently reduced risk of severe illness. 

Thus the situation today in Canada, as in many other countries is that although a majority of the population have been "vaccinated" against Covid, normal life continues to be prohibited, supposedly to protect the "vaccinated" from the un-"vaccinated." 

In truth, however, the un"vaccinated" are likely in greater need of protection from the "vaccinated" than are the "vaccinated" from the un"vaccinated". That is because, as noted above, the "vaccinated" are not immune to infection and may carry a high Covid viral load. Thus the "vaccinated" may be as likely as the un"vaccinateded" to spread the disease. Indeed, due to a false sense of immunity, the "vaccinated" may spread the disease more readily than the un"vaccinated." Such an effect may explain the phenomenon observed in many countries of an upturn in Covid infections following the onset of mass Covid "vaccination."

As a consequence of current Canadian policy, we exist in an unstable equilibrium with Covid. Most of the population, having been protected by the various social control measures plus "vaccination" from what would in most case have been a mild or asymptomatic Covid infection, lack the robust and durably full-spectrum immunity that follows infection.

Covid "vaccines" are not only short-lived in effect but also leaky, which is to say unable to provide full protection against infection or disease. What that means is that most members of a fully "vaccinated" and continually re-"vaccinated" population will, in time, experience a mild a Covid infection. Only with the natural immunity thus induced will long-lived and possibly life-long protection from future infection be achieved. 

“In my opinion, the current Israeli Government is as guilty as Joseph Megele. They have permitted human experimentation on our own people

“I would like to discuss, regarding children, the only reason you would want to treat a child (with the vax) is if you believe in child sacrifice. Let me explain. Anytime you evaluate any therapeutic you need to look at it [in] three perspectives.

Is it safe?
Does it work?
And do you need it?

Just because you have the capability doesn’t mean that you have to use it. It has to be a medical necessity. There has to be a need for it it. Look at the CDC, the statistics for [healthy] children under the age of 18, the survival rate is 99.998% with no treatment.”


Dr. Vladimir Zelenko testifying on Israel's Covid vaccination program before the Ma'aleh Adumin Rabbinic Court in Jerusalem Israel. 

But if this is the unannounced strategy behind the "vaccination" campaign, it is insane. First, the cost per life saved will be astronomical, meaning that money is being spent far less well than it could be on other life saving measures. Second, it is a strategy that ignores the fact that a large number of people already have full-spectrum Covid immunity from infection. Recent estimates put the proportion of the US population with immunity acquired through infection at 20%. Assuming a similar rate of natural immunity in Canada, that would imply the existence of 7.5 million Canadians upon whom the Government of Canada, in league with the Provinces, is intent on forcing a needless "vaccine," plus endless "booster" shots.

What we see in Canada is thus mass-scale medical malpractice. Vaccination comes at a cost in money, time and risk to human health. It should only be compelled in the case of dire national emergency, which the Covid epidemic is not. Moreover, the current mass vaccination campaign should have excluded those with natural immunity, which in turn, would have required Federal and Provincial governments to make provision for the determination of the immunity status of every citizen. This could yet be done (but won't be) by making available a T-Cell immunity test to all citizens.

As for those without immunity, they should have been divided into vulnerables and invulnerables. It would then have been possible to allow the latter group, including the vast majority of the population -- i.e., those under fifty without conditions predisposing to severe Covid illness, to lead a normal life and take their chances with the virus. Most, in time, would become infected asymptomatically or otherwise, thus acquiring robust and durable immunity, probably for life. 

For the vulnerables, vaccines should have been made available as a freely chosen option and with a full understanding of the limitations of the immunity thus provided, the risks entailed and the need for perhaps endless boosters.

In addition, vulnerable individuals in voluntary self-isolation, should have been offered free home delivery service for food and medicine, while those of working age should have been granted the right to work from home where such an arrangement was feasible. 

Instead we have a Fascistic and dim-witted state seeking to bully everyone into a potentially endless course of "vaccinations" and life restrictions. No wonder the People's Party of Canada, the only party to offer a common sense response to Covid, has popped in the latest Ekos poll to almost 12%, up from 1.6% in the last Federal election. 

Evidently, Canadians in growing numbers see that Justin Trudeau's Liberal Party, the Conservative Party of Canada and the New Democratic Party -- the main contenders for power in the forthcoming election and all supporters of current government Covid policy -- are unworthy of office. 

The problem for Canada is too many bureaucrats, academics and lame-brained journalists sucking at a government or corporate tit, ready always to relay any edict, however idiotic, criminal or insane, issued by the imbeciles and psychopaths at the top. 

Faced thus by the serried ranks of bogus scholars, intellectuals and journalists, the multitude can do no other than follow the fake science, and submit to whatever monstrous plan the powers that be ordain. Hence Canada's ongoing Covid catastrophe. Likewise, the US and British Covid lunacy, and the lockdown tyranny of the lame-brained Australian and New Zealand governments intent on the phantom of zero Covid.

Related:

Patent document shows DARPA built covid with the help of Bill Gates, WHO

Chinese defector claims he warned the US that China was covering up a deadly new virus in Wuhan MONTHS before Covid-19 was declared a pandemic

Idaho doctor reports a ‘20 times increase’ of cancer in vaccinated patients


ISRAELI STUDY: Fully Vaxxed Are 27 Times More Likely To Get COVID Compared To People With Natural Immunity


Irish Doctors explain Why Covid "Vaccination" Exposes Your Child's to Serious Risk:




Science Denied: The Biden Vaccine Mandate

Tucker Carlson On America's Real Crisis: The Degradation Of Americans

Narrative Nuked: Nearly Half Of 'COVID Hospitalizations' This Year Have Been Mild Or Asymptomatic Cases

UK Government Says Vaccine Passports Integral To COVID Winter Plan Day After They Were Supposedly Scrapped

SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees had a 13.06-fold (95% CI, 8.08 to 21.11) increased risk for breakthrough infection with the Delta variant compared to those previously infected, when the first event (infection or vaccination) occurred during January and February of 2021. The increased risk was significant (P<0.001) for symptomatic disease as well. When allowing the infection to occur at any time before vaccination (from March 2020 to February 2021), evidence of waning natural immunity was demonstrated, though SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees had a 5.96-fold (95% CI, 4.85 to 7.13-fold (95% CI, 5.51 to 9.21) increased risk for symptomatic disease. SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees were also at a greater risk for COVID-19-related-hospitalizations compared to those that were previously infected.
California Medical Ethics Prof With Natural Immunity Sues University Over Vaxx Mandate

Covid’s Willing Executioners

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko’s Testimony on Genocidal COVID-19 Vaccinations

Bojo scraps Covid vaccine passports

Brazil: No vax mandate vax makers accept responsibility for adverse effects


Members Of Congress, Staff Exempt From Biden Vaccine Mandate

Gov. DeSantis Annihilates Joe Biden Over Unconstitutional Vaccine Mandates

If You Are Vaccinated and You Fear the Un-Vaccinated, You Might Be a Moron

US VP, Kamala Harris: My Body, My Choice

Fauci: “I don’t have a firm answer” for why the previously infected should get vaxxed…

World Health Organization: Covid vaccines won't end pandemic -- spread of virus is inevitable (what they mean is that herd immunity must be -- as it should always have been -- recognized as the only way the pandemic can end, which is what the generally spurned Great Barrington Declaration epidemiologists said long ago. But reality filters into the minds of bureaucrats and politicians only slowly -- if at all.)

America's descent into full-blown tyranny

Biden Admin Losing Unwinnable War On COVID, Scapegoats 'Unvaccinated' Americans

Biden Let The Truth Out: "We're going to protect vaccinated workers from unvaccinated co-workers"

Rand Paul: Vaccine Mandates That Ignore Natural Immunity Should Not Be Adhered To

Biden's Vaccine Fiat Forges A Fascist Pharma Corporate State

Biden Unveils Most Severe COVID Actions Yet: Mandates Vax For All Federal Workers, Contractors, & Large Private Companies

Teenage boys at greater risk from vaccines than from Covid

The Telegraph, September 11, 2021: Teenage boys are six times more likely to suffer from heart problems from the vaccine than be hospitalised from Covid-19, a major study has found
Children who face the highest risk of a “cardiac adverse event” are boys aged between 12 and 15 following two doses of a vaccine, according to new research from the US.

The findings come as Professor Chris Whitty, England’s chief medical officer, prepares to advise ministers on whether there is a wider benefit to society from vaccinating children.
Last week, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) delivered its long-awaited verdict, saying the “margin of benefit” of jabbing 12- to 15-year-olds was “considered too small” and citing the low risk to healthy children from the virus.

However, Sajid Javid, the Health Secretary, said he wanted Prof Whitty and the chief medical officers from Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to “consider the vaccination of 12- to 15-year-olds from a broader perspective”.

He said he would then “consider the advice from the chief medical officers, building on the advice from the JCVI, before making a decision shortly”.

Report will prompt fresh concerns over jabs for children
Research published on Thursday will prompt fresh concerns about whether the risk of the vaccine outweighs the benefits for otherwise healthy children.

A team led by Dr Tracy Hoeg at the University of California investigated the rate of cardiac myocarditis - heart inflammation – and chest pain in children aged 12-17 following their second dose of the vaccine.

They then compared this with the likelihood of children needing hospital treatment owing to Covid-19, at times of low, moderate and high rates of hospitalisation.

Researchers found that the risk of heart complications for boys aged 12-15 following the vaccine was 162.2 per million, which was the highest out of all the groups they looked at.
Evidence from studies show it is unlikely for boys to suffer either heart problems from the vaccine or be hospitalised by Covid.

The second highest rate was among boys aged 16-17 (94.0 per million) followed by girls aged 16-17 (13.4 per million) and girls aged 12-15 (13.0 per million).

Meanwhile, the risk of a healthy boy needing hospital treatment owing to Covid-19 in the next 120 days is 26.7 per million. This means the risk they face from heart complications is 6.1 times higher than that of hospitalisation.

This is based on current rates of hospitalisations from Covid-19, which are judged to be “moderate”. During a period of low risk of hospitalisation, such as June 2021, the likelihood of heart complications rises to 22.8 times higher, and during a period of high risk, such as January 2021, the likelihood of heart complications is still 4.3 times higher.

The study, which has not yet been peer reviewed, analysed reports of adverse effects children have suffered from the vaccine between January and June of this year.

The study looked at MRNA vaccines - such as Pfizer and Moderna - which will be particularly relevant for Britain because youngsters will not be given the AstraZeneca jab because of the increased risk of dangerous blood clots.

Last Friday, the JCVI could only recommend that jabs among 12- to 15-year-olds be extended to include children with major heart, lung, kidney, liver and neurological conditions.

But ministers are understood to be keen to give the children’s vaccine roll out the green light, and the NHS has already started recruiting thousands of vaccinators for schools.

Related: 

The Biden Admin is losing its unwinnable War On COVID, so they're scapegoating 'unvaccinated' Americans

Tuesday, September 7, 2021

Harvard Med School Prof: Vaccine Passports Are Not Only Scientific Nonsense, They Are Discriminatory and Unethical

 

Prior COVID disease (many working class) provides better immunity than vaccines (many professionals), so vaccine mandates are not only scientific nonsense, they are also discriminatory and unethical.
Quote Tweet
Martin Kulldorff
@MartinKulldorff
·
In Israel, vaccinated individuals had 27 times higher risk of symptomatic COVID infection compared to those with natural immunity from prior COVID disease [95%CI:13-57, adjusted for time of vaccine/disease]. No COVID deaths in either group. medrxiv.org/content/10.110