We physicians gave up our training and our reasonable medical thought process. The reasons are multiple. First, it was the easy way out. Second, many of us are employed and fear reprisal. Third, despite what the public thinks, we physicians are not bold leaders, we tend to be sheep, and are afraid of having an entire institution ostracize us or our colleagues to think us crazy.
As we got to the point of vaccine rollout, doctors were not using the scientific method, questioning and challenging prevailing hypotheses. They kept their heads down, closed clinics, converted to telemedicine, and pushed only the jab.
I had conversations with doctors who are supposed experts in virology and immunology denying the lasting immunity of natural infection. Conversations about natural immunity:
“I have antibodies.”
“But they will wane.”
“But I have memory cells.”
Dumbfounded look.
Really, are these the leaders we want?
Other conversations about the safety of vaccines:
“The vaccine is safe.”
“No, we would have shut down any trial in the past after even 100 deaths.”
“This is more serious.”
“But the survival rate is about 99.6%.”
“It's killing people.”
“So is the vaccine”
“You can’t believe VAERS.”
“It was set up to help protect the public, and if anything, it is underreporting side effects.”
“You’re a conspiracy theorist.”
Or conversations about early treatment
“You must get the vaccine, it is the only “proven” treatment, there are no other treatments.”
“Really, ivermectin has eradicated COVID in India, parts of Mexico, Japan….”
“It is a horse dewormer.”
“It won a Nobel Prize in medicine, is a WHO essential drug, and has been around for decades with a great safety profile.”
“No, only the vaccine works.”
“But it is failing”
“You are a denier and a conspiracy theorist.”
“Sigh….”
Lately, it has been all about getting 100% of the population jabbed. For what reason? I am not sure, and some of the more detailed and investigated theories scare me. I shudder to think. But last year’s heroes are being labeled selfish and villainous for not getting the vaccine. Hospital systems have abandoned their community’s health and ignored early successful outpatient treatment in favor of huge government subsidies for inpatient and ICU treatment. The success of these treatments was not great, but that is another article. Now we have the same hospital systems turning their backs on their own employees. Basically, health providers have a choice, get shot, or get fired. How does that help? Both vaxxed and unvaxxed can spread the virus, so it doesn’t help anyone. It only helps the hospital to get more government money by meeting quotas.
Read more
Related:
Arrest the Puppy Killer FauciTen red flags in the FDA's risk-benefit analysis of Pfizer's EUA application to inject American children 5 to 11 with its mRNA productThe global population is roughly 7.8 billion people, if 10% have been infected that is 780 million cases. The global death toll currently attributed to Sars-Cov-2 infections is 1,061,539.
That’s an infection fatality rate of roughly or 0.14%. Right in line with seasonal flu and the predictions of many experts from all around the world.
0.14% is over 24 times LOWER than the WHO’s “provisional figure” of3.4% back in March. This figure was used in the models which were used to justify lockdowns and other draconian policies.
In fact, given the over-reporting of alleged Covid deaths, the IFR is likely even lower than 0.14%, and could show Covid to be much less dangerous than flu.
None of the mainstream press picked up on this. Though many outlets reported Dr Ryan’s words, they all attempted to make it a scary headline and spread more panic.
Apparently neither they, nor the WHO, were capable of doing the simple maths that shows us this is good news. And that the Covid sceptics have been right all along.
EcoHealth Throws NIH Under The Bus Over Wuhan Gain-Of-Function Report; Researcher Claims 'Massive Cover-Up'
Deleted UK Government Report Celebrates How Public Loves To "Conform"
I read this:
ReplyDelete"Deleted UK Government Report Celebrates How Public Loves To "Conform""
and I immediately recalled Simon Sheppard's monody on the "5 Monkeys Problem." The UK government (and all the rest, whoever they might be) know that the human organism really does love to conform.
Sheppard arranges his argument about the 5MP with photos from the National Geographic video, which is embedded in the third last paragraph. WARNING: It is all very convincing.
Sheppard and the 5 Monkeys --
https://www.heretical.com/sgs-2018/5monkeys.html
The 5MP video for the test, quite short, to the point, worrisome --
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7iN0V-GbM0
I re-read and re-watched it just a few weeks back, making me realize our Excellent Covid Adventure is a literally planet-wide repeat of this still somewhat obscure experiment. If nothing else answer's the question asked during the conformist 1950s: MUST YOU CONFORM?
Alas, yes.
Thank you for those most informative links:
DeleteThe Five Monkeys Problem, and The Brain Games Conformity Waiting Room.
What the experiments you draw attention to demonstrate is that with the right manipulation of appearances, it is possible to persuade almost everyone of the truth of a lie despite an abundance of evidence to refute it.
There will always be a few holdouts though. People not properly socialized, who just note the facts and the logic of the situation. In dealing with such people, elimination, aka genocide, provides a final solution, and one that the decrepit CIA asset, Noam Chompsky, proposes should be set in motion to deal with those unpersuaded by the vax bullshit.