Lockdowns, business closures, ballooning public debt and deficits, interrupted schooling, adverse vaccine events including death — over 12, 000 in the Province of Ontario alone: these are among the many costs of the war on Covid.
What have been the benefits?
No doubt in the early stages of the epidemic some Covid infections, and hence deaths, were avoided by measures to "flatten the curve." Because of the costs, however, such draconian measures could not be maintained indefinitely. Rather, they were imposed to limit viral spread until the many novel so-called vaccines for Covid then under development became available for use, albeit without the usual multi-year-long human and animal safety testing.
Beginning in January of this year, "vaccines" have been rapidly deployed in many countries. The results, however, have been disappointing. In Israel, for example, one of the first countries to achieve majority "vaccinated" status, vaccine efficacy (in preventing illness, not infection) declined from over 90% initially to a percentage in the low twenties after six months. The decline in effectiveness means that maintenance of high immunity will require "booster" shots at intervals of just a few months.
In the United States, the Center for Disease Control reported that the "vaccinated" are not protected from infection and may carry as heavy a viral load as the un-"vaccinated". The "vaccines" thus fail to provide immunity from infection or to prevent viral spread, although they apparently reduced risk of severe illness.
Thus the situation today in Canada, as in many other countries is that although a majority of the population have been "vaccinated" against Covid, normal life continues to be prohibited, supposedly to protect the "vaccinated" from the un-"vaccinated."
In truth, however, the un"vaccinated" are likely in greater need of protection from the "vaccinated" than are the "vaccinated" from the un"vaccinated". That is because, as noted above, the "vaccinated" are not immune to infection and may carry a high Covid viral load. Thus the "vaccinated" may be as likely as the un"vaccinateded" to spread the disease. Indeed, due to a false sense of immunity, the "vaccinated" may spread the disease more readily than the un"vaccinated." Such an effect may explain the phenomenon observed in many countries of an upturn in Covid infections following the onset of mass Covid "vaccination."
As a consequence of current Canadian policy, we exist in an unstable equilibrium with Covid. Most of the population, having been protected by the various social control measures plus "vaccination" from what would in most case have been a mild or asymptomatic Covid infection, lack the robust and durably full-spectrum immunity that follows infection.
Covid "vaccines" are not only short-lived in effect but also leaky, which is to say unable to provide full protection against infection or disease. What that means is that most members of a fully "vaccinated" and continually re-"vaccinated" population will, in time, experience a mild a Covid infection. Only with the natural immunity thus induced will long-lived and possibly life-long protection from future infection be achieved.
| “In my opinion, the current Israeli Government is as guilty as Joseph Megele. They have permitted human experimentation on our own people” “I would like to discuss, regarding children, the only reason you would want to treat a child (with the vax) is if you believe in child sacrifice. Let me explain. Anytime you evaluate any therapeutic you need to look at it [in] three perspectives. Is it safe? Does it work? And do you need it? Just because you have the capability doesn’t mean that you have to use it. It has to be a medical necessity. There has to be a need for it it. Look at the CDC, the statistics for [healthy] children under the age of 18, the survival rate is 99.998% with no treatment.” Dr. Vladimir Zelenko testifying on Israel's Covid vaccination program before the Ma'aleh Adumin Rabbinic Court in Jerusalem Israel. |
But if this is the unannounced strategy behind the "vaccination" campaign, it is insane. First, the cost per life saved will be astronomical, meaning that money is being spent far less well than it could be on other life saving measures. Second, it is a strategy that ignores the fact that a large number of people already have full-spectrum Covid immunity from infection. Recent estimates put the proportion of the US population with immunity acquired through infection at 20%. Assuming a similar rate of natural immunity in Canada, that would imply the existence of 7.5 million Canadians upon whom the Government of Canada, in league with the Provinces, is intent on forcing a needless "vaccine," plus endless "booster" shots.
What we see in Canada is thus mass-scale medical malpractice. Vaccination comes at a cost in money, time and risk to human health. It should only be compelled in the case of dire national emergency, which the Covid epidemic is not. Moreover, the current mass vaccination campaign should have excluded those with natural immunity, which in turn, would have required Federal and Provincial governments to make provision for the determination of the immunity status of every citizen. This could yet be done (but won't be) by making available a T-Cell immunity test to all citizens.
As for those without immunity, they should have been divided into vulnerables and invulnerables. It would then have been possible to allow the latter group, including the vast majority of the population -- i.e., those under fifty without conditions predisposing to severe Covid illness, to lead a normal life and take their chances with the virus. Most, in time, would become infected asymptomatically or otherwise, thus acquiring robust and durable immunity, probably for life.
For the vulnerables, vaccines should have been made available as a freely chosen option and with a full understanding of the limitations of the immunity thus provided, the risks entailed and the need for perhaps endless boosters.
In addition, vulnerable individuals in voluntary self-isolation, should have been offered free home delivery service for food and medicine, while those of working age should have been granted the right to work from home where such an arrangement was feasible.
Instead we have a Fascistic and dim-witted state seeking to bully everyone into a potentially endless course of "vaccinations" and life restrictions. No wonder the People's Party of Canada, the only party to offer a common sense response to Covid, has popped in the latest Ekos poll to almost 12%, up from 1.6% in the last Federal election.
Evidently, Canadians in growing numbers see that Justin Trudeau's Liberal Party, the Conservative Party of Canada and the New Democratic Party -- the main contenders for power in the forthcoming election and all supporters of current government Covid policy -- are unworthy of office.
The problem for Canada is too many bureaucrats, academics and lame-brained journalists sucking at a government or corporate tit, ready always to relay any edict, however idiotic, criminal or insane, issued by the imbeciles and psychopaths at the top.
Faced thus by the serried ranks of bogus scholars, intellectuals and journalists, the multitude can do no other than follow the fake science, and submit to whatever monstrous plan the powers that be ordain. Hence Canada's ongoing Covid catastrophe. Likewise, the US and British Covid lunacy, and the lockdown tyranny of the lame-brained Australian and New Zealand governments intent on the phantom of zero Covid.
Related:
Patent document shows DARPA built covid with the help of Bill Gates, WHOSARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees had a 13.06-fold (95% CI, 8.08 to 21.11) increased risk for breakthrough infection with the Delta variant compared to those previously infected, when the first event (infection or vaccination) occurred during January and February of 2021. The increased risk was significant (P<0.001) for symptomatic disease as well. When allowing the infection to occur at any time before vaccination (from March 2020 to February 2021), evidence of waning natural immunity was demonstrated, though SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees had a 5.96-fold (95% CI, 4.85 to 7.13-fold (95% CI, 5.51 to 9.21) increased risk for symptomatic disease. SARS-CoV-2-naïve vaccinees were also at a greater risk for COVID-19-related-hospitalizations compared to those that were previously infected.
Covid’s Willing Executioners
America's descent into full-blown tyranny
Biden Admin Losing Unwinnable War On COVID, Scapegoats 'Unvaccinated' Americans
Biden Let The Truth Out: "We're going to protect vaccinated workers from unvaccinated co-workers"
Rand Paul: Vaccine Mandates That Ignore Natural Immunity Should Not Be Adhered To
Biden's Vaccine Fiat Forges A Fascist Pharma Corporate State
Wish that this article wasn’t full of unsubstantiated theories. 12,000 people did NOT die from the vaccine in Ontario, would love to see the evidence for this though ( the link is dead). Also the vaccines are not “leaky”. Let’s say they were leaky though, wouldn’t that be saving lives? If you look at the data it is clear that vaccinated people are much better off than the unvaccinated right now. Just look at BC or Alberta where most people are vaccinated yet 85-90% of people in ICU are not. Hmmm. Have you ever thought about WHY there are so many BS theories about the virus, masks or vaccines? Now there is a conspiracy theory you should be looking into.
ReplyDeleteHey Dogie, thanks for pointing out that my link to Public Health Ontario's report of "Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFIs) for COVID-19 in Ontario: December 13, 2020 to September 4, 2021 was defective -- it works now and it does report more than 12,000 adverse events following immunization: 12,148 to be exact.
DeleteYou are incorrect in claiming that the Covid vaccines are not leaky. A leaky vaccine is one that prevents the development of disease symptoms, but does not protect against infection and the onwards transmission of pathogens.
This, as everyone now surely knows is a true of the Covid vaccines, although they do not always prevent the development of disease symptoms and even death.
Concerning the relative vulnerability of vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals to disease, you merely repeat what I acknowledged. The vaccines do work, though they are leaky and may even fail to protect against severe illness or death.
A downside to leaky vaccines, is that they promote the emergence of vaccine resistant variants. You should read about Marek's disease in poultry and the vaccine that allows vaccinated birds to spread the disease throughout the rest of the population -- and kill them:
This chicken vaccine makes its virus more dangerous
Interestingly, in the context of Covid vaccines, the Marek's disease vaccine has been used deliberately to kill, as a means to end a fowl pest epidemic.
And here's something that should interest you, Dogie:
DeleteTeenage boys are six times more likely to suffer from heart problems caused by the COVID-19 vaccine than to be hospitalized as a result of COVID-19 itself
Well thank you CS for updating the link. I also thank you about setting me straight about leaky vaccines. I was under the impression that “leaky” meant that the vaccinated were spreading spike proteins to the unvaccinated, but this is a false definition that I read somewhere else.
ReplyDeleteYour welcome. And yes, the story about the vaccinated shedding spike protein seems very weird, and improbable.
Delete