Why You Must Get Vaccinated

●”If I get vaccinated can I stop wearing a mask?”

Government: “NO”

●”If I get vaccinated will the restaurants, bars, schools, fitness clubs, hair salons, etc. reopen and will people be able to get back to work like normal?” 

Government: “NO”

●”If I get vaccinated will I be resistant to Covid?”

Government: “Maybe. We don’t know exactly, but probably not.” 

●”If I get vaccinated, at least I won’t be contagious to others – right?”

Government: “NO. the vaccine doesn’t stop transmission.” 

●”If I get vaccinated, how long will the vaccine last?”

Government: “No one knows. All Covid “vaccines” are still in the experimental stage.”

● “If I get vaccinated, can I stop social distancing?”

Government: “NO”

● “If my parents, grandparents and myself all get vaccinated can we hug each other again?”

Government: “NO”

● “So what’s the benefit of getting vaccinated?” 

Government: “Hoping that the virus won’t kill you.”

●”Are you sure the vaccine won’t injure or  kill me?” 

Government: “NO”

●”If statistically the virus won’t kill me (99.7% survival rate), why should I get vaccinated?”

Government: “To protect others.”

●”So if I get vaccinated, I can protect 100% of people I come in contact with?” 

Government: “NO”

● “If I experience a severe adverse reaction, long-term effects (still unknown) or die from the vaccine will I (or my family) be compensated from the vaccine manufacture or the Government?” 

Government: “NO – the government and vaccine manufacturer’s have 100% zero liability regarding this experimental drug”

Source

Related:

The Latest: Vaccinated don't need masks at work in Anchorage

534 Dead 330,063 Reported Injured following COVID19 Experimental Vaccine Injections in the U.K.

When it comes to vaccines, suddenly “from vs with” matters again

Gov. Ron DeSantis holds a public health roundtable at the Florida State Capitol on the effectiveness of Covid lockdowns, mask wearing, and contact tracing

Lockdowns killed countless thousand due to missed cancer diagnoses (over a million cases in the US) and deferred treatment of cancer and other serious diseases, yet in the US, lockdown states had rates of Covid deaths no lower than those of non-lockdown states.

School closures achieved essentially nothing to restrict the spread of the disease, while inflicting serious loss of opportunity on children. Long-distance learning was a failure; school closures resulted in increased cases of child abuse, and imposed a particularly heavy burden on low-income households.

There is no evidence that mask wearing restricts viral spread, but it can induce overconfidence leading to behaviour that promotes viral spread. For children masking is psychologically harmful. During exercise, mask wearing is harmful.

Based on experience with other corona viruses, it is most probably that those who have had Covid will have persistent, effective and life-long immunity from severe disease and death from Covid.

The response to the virus by most governments worldwide has displayed a complete rejection of decades of relevant biological and immunological knowledge.

Vaccine passports are a bad idea because they cause increased resistance to vaccination, moreover, those who have already had the infection derive no benefit from vaccination, as they already have durable and robust immunity.

Most infections are mild or asymptomatic, and asymptomatic cases cause little disease spread.

Severe disease is limited almost entirely to a small and well identified section of the population, namely the elderly and those with other conditions.

Covid models upon which public policy responses in the Western world were based are inprecise at best and highly misleading at worst, and they drove many mistaken policy decisions.

Media coverage involved deliberate distortion of the data, and a serious lack of balance. On social media there was overt censorship of any who opposed the media's control over the message.

Those who advocated a strategy of focused protection of the most vulnerable were treated by the media as renegades, crazy people not following "the science."

The focus on lockdowns without regard for the collateral damage was an abandonment of the principles of public health management that must consider all health consequences, both physical and mental, of public policy.

The assumption that lockdowns would protect anyone, including the most vulnerable, proved false as the tremendous Covid death toll in care homes proved.

The failure of public health measures in the face of the Covid pandemic means that there has been a loss of trust in public health authorities: trust that must be rebuilt if we are to cope effectively with a future, and possibly much more serious, health emergency. 

Related: 

Israel Shamir: Covid: Starters or Main Course

“The Great Reset” Is Here: “Insane Lockdown” of the Global Economy, “The Green Agenda”

WAYNE ROOT: Why Isn’t Everyone in Florida Dead, or in the Hospital?

Naomi Wolf: The end of America

New York COVID variant could infect the vaccinated

Britain's Catastrophic Lockdown

DR JOHN LEE: My darkest predictions have come true... the effects of Covid lockdowns are catastrophic

Did Public Policy Increase Covid Infectivity and Virulence

Mutant variations and the danger of lockdowns

By Jemma Morris:

Have non-pharmaceutical interventions, including lockdowns and social distancing, enabled more dangerous virus variants to thrive?

At the beginning of 2020 we embarked upon a nationwide epidemiological experiment in an attempt to reduce the mortality burden of the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus. The premise of the experiment, though never formally defined, was to trial the efficacy of non-pharmaceutical interventions with respect to the infection rate and subsequent death toll of an airborne respiratory virus.

The hypothesis was treated as a foregone conclusion and presented with little doubt. A significant reduction in person-to-person interactions within a population will lead to a decreased infection rate and reduce the number of deaths associated with the virus. The scientific community were so confident in this hypothesis that they did not present it as a hypothesis at all. The experiment was not defined as an experiment. The resulting data was subsequently ignored.

No matter how certain we are of the outcome, good science is about asking questions

It’s easy to see why. Given our most basic understanding of how viruses spread from one person to another, any measures that suppress the transmission of viruses should inevitably lead to a reduction in associated mortality. But given that we have never actually investigated this correlation in a real-world setting, perhaps assumptions based on our “most basic understanding” are not sufficient. No matter how certain we are of the outcome, good science is about asking questions. If the answers contradict your assumptions then those answers should bring about a shift in your understanding.

One year into the great experiment, we have a wealth of global data to inform our conclusions. This data largely contradicts the confident hypothesis with which we embarked upon this journey and has therefore been ignored. Scientists and politicians have clutched at straws, manipulated data or simply ignored the evidence in an attempt to safeguard the integrity of the original idea.

Read more

Related: 

Spacing COVID-19 vaccine doses has epidemiological benefits, but longer-term outcomes depend on immunity robustness

Epidemiological and evolutionary considerations of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dosing regimes

Covid and the 'Great Reset' — the Animal Farm version

The Most Powerful Man in the World

 

How it really happened:

Related: 

How to ensure stairs are safe for someone with dementia

Will Vaccines End the Pandemic?

From Britain, where 35% of the population has now been jabbed with one of the novel RNA "vaccines," the indications are that the treatment works. Among the "vaccinated" both cases and hospitalization rates are falling. 

Thus: 

Even a single dose of the Pfizer or AstraZeneca vaccines helps reduce the incidence of both severe illness and hospitalizations, 

Even a single dose also helps lower mortality.

Still, there are some who say it is too soon to declare victory over Covid. Indeed, it has been argued that mass vaccination during a pandemic is precisely the wrong thing to do.

Why?

Because it will drive viral immune escape, making the virus resistant to, not only the novel "vaccines," but also the body's natural defense mechanisms.

Perhaps the most vocal exponent of this concern is the highly qualified vaccine expert, Dr. G. vanden Bossche. In this interview he expounds the reason for his concern:

Or to summarize Dr. vanden Bossche's thesis, the mRNA vaccines:

(1) suppress disease expression without preventing infection and virus transmission.

(2) induce antibodies effective against current viral strains, while suppressing the production of natural, long-lived, broad-spectrum antibodies effective against novel virus strains. 

(3) because of (1) and (2), vaccines drive the survival and spread of novel viral strains against which the current mRNA vaccines will be ineffective.

Those, collectively, must be the mechanisms that account, in whole or in part, for the phenomenon of antibody-determined enhancement, or ADE -- the enhancement being of viral infectivity and disease severity. 

So are the Brits really winning the war on Covid?

Or are they merely enjoying hubris before nemesis in the form of a renewed and more deadly "vaccine"-induced epidemic?

Ominously, Zero Hedge reports: COVID Cases Are Spiking In A Dozen States With High Vaccination Rates but the details provided are too few to draw any conclusion as to whether these trends could be an early indication of ADE in action.

What is not certain the question of vaccine safety is that expert opinion is uncertain. Thus for example, a review article published only five months ago in the journal Frontiers in Immunology concluded with the following statement:

Potential disease enhancement and other theoretical safety concerns related to each type of vaccine need to be understood and carefully monitored for, while potential suboptimal immunity may need to be overcome. Certain vulnerable populations may respond poorly to vaccination, or the vaccine may predominantly protect against severe disease, rather than infection. If T cells prove critical for protection, it will be necessary to ensure that the included T cell epitopes are recognized by enough HLA types to ensure worldwide coverage.

So if you've already been vaccinated, thanks and congratulations for taking part in the world's largest ever experimental vaccine trial. 

Related: 

Norwegian Doctor Claims To Find Link Between AstraZeneca Vaccine And Rare Blood Clots

ITS TIME – VIDEO!! BANNED EVERYWHERE – PLEASE WATCH – LAST HOPE VIDEO!!

Share: Facebook Twitter Google Plus Myspace MSN Live Yahoo LinkedIn Orkut Digg Delicious

Understanding the Covid Coup

 Rob Slane: 

We Willingly Gave Up Liberty, Yet Are Shocked to Find Out We Are Less Free

Through fear and hysteria, millions actually believed the authorities when they put forward the absurd suggestion that they could “Control the Virus.” In fact, what they then proceeded to do was “Control the People.” The idea that Lockdowns “Control the Virus” and reduce mortality has been shown by more than 30 studies to be a fallacy; whereas the truth that Lockdowns “Control the People” is blindingly obvious, and should be apparent to everyone after a year of often mad restrictions that have curtailed perfectly normal activities....

AIER: 

Lockdowns Do Not Control the Coronavirus: The Evidence

The use of universal lockdowns in the event of the appearance of a new pathogen has no precedent. It has been a science experiment in real time, with most of the human population used as lab rats. The costs are legion.

The question is whether lockdowns worked to control the virus in a way that is scientifically verifiable. Based on the following studies, the answer is no and for a variety of reasons: bad data, no correlations, no causal demonstration, anomalous exceptions, and so on. There is no relationship between lockdowns (or whatever else people want to call them to mask their true nature) and virus control....

Bloomberg News: Covid no more deadly than the flu 

to those under 40 and barely more so to those over 40:

After you have examined that graph showing essentially zero Covid 19 mortality in infants and children under the age of 14, consider this insane fact:Moderna starts COVID-19 vaccine trial in infants and young children     Yet 96% of Covid-19-related excess deaths in Europe were in people over 70 years old. So what did Western governments do? While the vaccine vendors were intent on vaccinating babies who are naturally immune to the disease, they locked up the entire population, while forcing Covid-19-infected people from hospital into care homes for the elderly, setting off one lethal epidemic after another and accounting for around half of all Covid-19 deaths. Brilliant: Well done BoJo, Justin, and Governor Cuomo of New York, etc.What other apparent lunacy did these governments commit? Well having stripped a large proportion of the population of their livlihood, governments compensated the people by handing out free money. In the process, Canada, for example, blew up a Government deficit of $20 billion dollars in 2019 to $382 billion (projected, underestimated, whatever) in 2020. In the US, the Feds printed so much money to buy votes and keep the terrorized population docile, that 40% of all US dollars ever created were created within the year. And that, surely, is the wonderful payoff for the Money Power. Massive money printing, equals inflation, which, wait for it, means a decline in real wages, something employers love. it also means a devaluation of debt, something so welcome to corporate borrowers everywhere. So if you think Covid only robbed you of a year of productive life, think again. If you're a worker, it likely has cost you a large chunk of future real earnings. Still, we can take comfort from the World Health Organizations statement on vaccine effectiveness:

Does it prevent infection and transmission?

We do not know whether the vaccine will prevent infection and protect against onward transmission. Immunity persists for several months, but the full duration is not yet known. These important questions are being studied.

LOL. That should give you confidence -- confidence that :"persists for several months." But after that, don't worry, they'll have another "jab" for you. In fact, before this is over you may find you've been transformed into a human pin cushion.

t 

f 

 

 

Canadian Doctors Explode Government-Directed Covid Scare Campaign

The main points:

# The PCR test used to determine cases overestimates by a factor of 30 to 1

# Asymptomatic spread is negligible to non-existent (so much for masking healthy people)

# Children under the age of 10 are rarely sick with Covid and thus do not transmit it, which means that elementary school closures are entirely unwarranted

# Mortality due to Covid among children under 18 is less than that from influenza

# The mRNA "vaccine" won't protect you from infection. At best, it will induce the production of antibodies that will save you from being sick from infection, such protection being good for no more than a few months, and perhaps being no good at all following infection by a novel Covid strain.

# Long-lasting protection from infection depends on T-cell immunity induced by a previous infection or a real vaccine. It is likely that 30 to 50% of the population have protection from infection by Covid due to T-cell immunity induced by past infection by a corona virus -- for example, certain common cold viruses.

# You can protect yourself from severe Covid by exercising out of doors (which means getting some sunlight with which to make Vitamin D), and supplementing your diet with vitamins C and D, zinc, and magnesium.

And remember that something like half of all serious Covid cases are hospital acquired according to this report from Scotland, and most other serious cases are acquired in care homes, so if you're neither in hospital nor in a care home your risk of serious illness from Covid is next to nothing.

Related:

***And from another Canadian doctor: “I have never seen a patient sick with COVID-19. We are being deceived and manipulated”***

Stay at Home – Protect the NHS – 100K Deaths: Is it all a lie? An analysis of ONS and NHS data

Welcome to the Upside Down

Nature Communications: Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China

300 asymptomatic cases (detection rate 0.303/10,000, 95% CI 0.270–0.339/10,000) were identified. There were no positive tests amongst 1,174 close contacts of asymptomatic cases.

 

C.J. Hopkins: The New Normal (Phase 2)

How to Rubbish the Covid Cops:

The Biden Administration and the Death of the American Republic

 

• This section of the Constitution says that the US will guarantee every state in this Union a Republican form of government – but the Democrats just stole the 2020 election. 
• The Constitution states the US will protect each state against invasion but the borders under the Democrats are wide open. 
• The Constitution protects every state against domestic violence but Democrat-led cities allow BLM and Antifa to burn them to the ground. 

It is clear Democrats will not enforce this one section in our Constitution, disregarding our Constitution and making it worthless.   Americans believe in the law, not the lawless Democrat destructive policies.  It’s time for our politicians to change and uphold our Constitution or be removed from government or arrested.

It’s time for Americans to decide, are we going to live in a lawless society or will we live according to the US Constitution.  The choice is ours.

Source

Covid 19 Vaccination: Leading to a Global Viral-Immune-Escape Catastrophe?

 Letter to Editor of Focus Malaysia

A LEADING global environmental virologist and microbiologist for 30 years and involved in human vaccine development for 23 years with various major pharmaceutical firms, Dr Geert Vanden Bossche warns that the global vaccination programme amid the global pandemic does more harm than good.

Expressing genuine concerns if the vaccination was the right thing to do against this super smart mutating coronavirus, he stated: “If you go to war, make sure you have the right weapon at the right time against the enemy that you understand enough.”

He further warns that the vaccination:

• Creates more asymptomatic cases to spread the virus as the vaccines do not prevent infection and transmission;
• Merely suppresses COVID-19 symptoms and can prevent hospitalisation and deaths. But at what price?
• only stimulates artificially induced antigen-specific antibodies and not natural killer (NK) cells needed to neutralize the coronavirus effectively;
• Allows antigen-specific antibodies, which may not work on new variants, to remain permanently and compete with, undermine and even destroy capable and loyal warrior NK cells;
• Helps create new variants and “teaches” the virus on “viral immune escape”; and
• It is a “lose-lose” situation that is dangerous at all levels, emphasizing that dealing with the coronavirus and pandemic must be based on science.

In a nutshell, if we aren’t cautious, humanity – facing a “global catastrophe without equal” – will suffer exponentially by this “emperor” virus. 

In June 2020, Ken Frazier, CEO of Merck, implored the need to understand the coronavirus more before rushing for a quick solution via vaccines. (Merck is the gold standard for vaccine development and had produced four out of seven successful vaccines in world history)

Merck was honest enough to give up its COVID-19 vaccine development programme to this mutating “emperor” virus to focus on a treatment or cure.

The Director of US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in stating in a CNN report on March 2 that gains made in the US including the mRNA vaccination could be wiped out by new variants. This supports Dr Bossche’s warning.

The US Government National Institutes of Health (NIH) has confirmed that the mRNA vaccine is a form of gene therapy, an approach that can have “serious health risks, such as toxicity, inflammation and cancer.”

Already, there are many reported cases worldwide about unexplained deaths and suffering from severe side effects after taking the Pfizer product.

Being constructive and based on Dr Bossche’s revelatory warning, we appeal to the Government and its relevant agencies to:

• Urgently consider deferring, if necessary, the mRNA vaccination programme to truly curb long-term harm;
• Do an honest “benefits versus risks” analysis for every vaccine purchased based on the latest information (It is UNFAIR to lump these vaccines together as not all vaccines are equal. We are NOT anti-vaxxers but pro-SAFE vaccines);
• Keep its promise NOT to force – directly or indirectly – vaccination, especially with the experimental mRNA vaccine, which is a breach of the Nuremberg Code; and
• Consider (after a study) using more appropriate, much safer, and tried and tested vaccines such as using inactivated or attenuated virus technology while choosing the right timing to enforce the vaccination programme.

Therefore, we urge the Government to immediately approve Ivermectin, a repurposed” wonder drug” that’s easily available, very safe and effective in preventing and treating COVID-19 and also fund a low-cost Ivermectin Programme.

We are aware that Ivermectin poses a major financial threat to some big pharmaceutical firms and unfortunately. Ivermectin is being discredited and demonized by people with selfish interest, whose biased views must be seriously dismissed.

In fact, Ivermectin has already been proven to be safe for over 40 years. The Government has nothing to lose by immediately approving Ivermectin in Malaysia, as a prescribed drug. There is no need to wait for clinical trials as people are dying fast and getting infected from COVID-19.

We state clearly here that we do not have vested interest, directly or indirectly, in the manufacturing, selling or distribution of Ivermectin. – March 12, 2021

Signatories:

Covid Research Centre, Kuala Lumpur

Persatuan Pengguna Islam Malaysia (PPIM)
Persatuan Patriot Kebangsaan (PATRIOT)
Gabungan NGO Islam (GNI)

Related:

OffGuardian: The Curious Case of Geert Vanden Bossche

Science Mag, January, 2021: New Covid mutations raise specter of ‘immune escape’

Michaela Lucas, et al. 2001: Viral escape mechanisms – escapology taught by viruses

Geert Vanden Bossche 2021: Why mass vaccinaton amidst a pandemic creates an irrepressible monster

Who Gives a Damn If Someone Asked About the Color of Archie's Skin?

The British tabloids are in uproar because Meghan ReMarkable claimed a member of the Royal Family questioned the color of her child's skin.

Why does that matter?

Why does anyone care who questioned the color of Archie’s skin?

Why shouldn’t someone question the color of Archie’s skin?

What if they’d questioned whether he’d have red hair?

Would that have been a racist crime against white people, or what?

That large numbers of people appear to care what, for a reported payment of seven million dollars, Meghan and Harry are moaning about indicates the imbecility of the Western world.

It’s time to remember the old English saying that “Sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me.”

It’s time to restore the right of free speech and tell Meghan and Harry and every other victim-status-seeking  politically-correct idiot to go piss up a rope.

And, yeah, what is the color of Archie's skin — and does he have red hair?

Related:

Motherhood abolished in British Wokestan 

Why You Should Refuse the "Vaccine"

You should resist the RNA Covid vaccine because: 

First, there are well defined potential dangers to health consequent on such inoculation, dangers that have not been excluded through long-term safety testing. Hazards include:

Anaphylactic shock leading to possible death, and;

Antibody-dependent enhancement of susceptibility to virus infection and disease manifestation, with reference to which see: 

 

Nature: Antibody-dependent enhancement and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and therapies 

 

Science: Antibody-dependent enhancement

Second, vaccine efficacy is not well defined and may be minimal. Hence, the US Center for Disease Control advises those who have been fully vaccinated, meaning those having had two RNA vaccine shots, to:

keep taking precautions in public places like wearing a mask, staying 6 feet apart from others, and avoiding crowds and poorly ventilated spaces until we know more.

So what, really, is the point? 

 Third, unless you are in hospital or a care home, your risk of death from Covid-19 is negligible. 

How so, did you ask?  

Because,

First, more than half of all severe Covid-19 cases are likely hospital-acquired, as this study in Scotland shows to have been the case in December 2020.

Second, in most if not all Western countries, between 40 and 70% of Covid-19 deaths are reported to have occurred in nursing homes.

So excluding hospital-acquired infections and care-home-acquired infections, how many serious infections were prevented by lockdown? Well actually, probably less than none since lockdown itself promoste infection spread within households.  

Fourth, vaccination is being pushed to enforce a requirement for what, in time, will likely become a universal internal passport that every citizen will be required to carry and which will define your social credit score as tech-empowered governments seek to reduce citizenship to helotry.  

Nigel Farage/Piers Morgan/Candace Owens: Meghan and Harry's Sad and Shameful Attack on Harry's Family and Native Land

And Tucker Carlson:


Related: Harry and Meghan's PR team 'sent bizarre warning to BBC not to only use ''old white men'' in coverage of Duchess's Oprah interview'

Covid, A Healthcare-Dependent Killer?

Up to Two Thirds of Serious Covid Infections are Caught in Hospital – Study

Can that be true?

Seems totally reasonable. 

Seems totally reasonable. Hospitals are mainly occupied by those at high risk of death from Covid, namely, elderly people who are also sick.

Hospitals are also the places where people on the outside are taken if they become seriously ill with Covid. So now you have virus carriers in close proximity with people most endangered by the virus.

Add to that the staff, which will include many 20- to 40-year-olds, i.e., the most socially active demographic that is mainly responsible for the spread of Covid outside of hospital.

Then, in hospital, you have many Covid-infected people, both patients and staff, which creates highly favorable conditions for the virus to infect and kill more of the highly vulnerable: i.e., elderly patients in hospital for treatment of conditions such as heart or respiratory diseases which greatly increase the risk of death from Covid.

Then, to get an even bigger bang for your buck, you move those hospital-infected Covid patients over the age of 65 to care homes, which creates a whole new opportunity for the disease to spread among the sick and very elderly, most of whom will go down like ninepins.

And the vaccine wont save them: as reported from British Columbia, even after vaccination of the majority of staff and patients, Covid outbreaks are occurring in care homes (and here). 

Covid, is thus essentially a health-care-facilitated killer.

Related: 

Novavax's COVID-19 vaccine prevents 96% of infections against original strain of the virus including 86.3% of UK 'super-covid' cases - but is only 55.4% effective against the South Africa variant

Open Letter from Doctors and Scientists to the European Medicines Agency regarding COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Concerns

7 European Nations Halt AstraZeneca Jabs On Reports Of "Serious" Blood Clots

Nearly 300 'adverse events' following COVID-19 vaccinations in B.C.

Stanford Medical Professor Insists COVID Lockdowns "Worst Public Health Mistake In Last 100 Years"

America’s Frontline Doctors Call on the Government and the Commercial Airline Industry to Abandon Requiring COVID-19 Vaccines

Swiss Policy Research: Covid-19 — Just the Facts

Facts about Covid-19

SWISS POLICY RESEARCH

Updated: March 2021

Fully referenced facts about covid-19, provided by experts in the field, to help you make a realistic risk assessment. 

Overview

1. Lethality: According to the latest immunological studies, the overall infection fatality rate (IFR) of covid-19 in the general population is about 0.1% to 0.5% in most countries, which is most closely comparable to the medium influenza pandemics of 1957 and 1968.
2. Treatment: For people at high risk or high exposure, early or prophylactic treatment is essential to prevent progression of the disease. According to numerous international studies, early outpatient treatment of covid may reduce hospitalizations and deaths by about 75%.
3. Age profile: The median age of covid deaths is over 80 years in most Western countries (but 78 in the US) and about 5% of the deceased had no serious preconditions. The age and risk profile of covid mortality is therefore comparable to normal mortality, but increases it proportionally.
4. Nursing homes: In many Western countries, up to two thirds of all covid deaths have occurred in nursing homes, which require targeted and humane protection. In some cases, care home residents died not from the coronavirus, but from weeks of stress and isolation.
5. Excess mortality: In most Western countries, the pandemic increased mortality by 5% to 15% in 2020. Up to 30% of the additional deaths were caused not by covid, but by indirect effects of the pandemic and lockdowns (e.g. fewer treatments of cancer and heart attack patients).
6. Antibodies: By the end of 2020, antibody seroprevalence was between 10% and 30% of the population in most Western countries. At seroprevalence levels above 30%, a significant decrease in the infection rate was observed in many regions.

And much more

Related: 

First Court Case Against Mandatory COVID Vaccination Filed In New Mexico

Canadian Health Minister: We’re Certainly Working on the Idea of Vaccine Passports with our G7 Partners

CBC: New outbreak of COVID-19 in B.C. care home where residents and staff were already vaccinated

During a live news conference about the outbreak, Provincial Health Officer Dr. Bonnie Henry emphasized being vaccinated doesn't mean transmission will be stopped and that precautions must remain in place for seniors and care homes. Dr. Henry said two staff members and 10 residents have tested positive at the Cottonwoods facility, which is a long-term care home with 221 publicly-funded beds. Henry said that all staff and residents at the home were offered immunizations and that there was very high uptake of the vaccine. She said some of the cases were among people who had received two doses of the vaccine. "You can have transmission even when people are fully vaccinated," she said. "The illness seems to be milder and doesn't transmit as much [and we] won't see rapid explosive outbreaks."

"The illness seems to be milder and doesn't transmit as much"

LOL. 

On what basis does she make such a claim? 

Sheer imagination, presumably. 

But what else is she to say when compulsory vaccination with a novel so-called vaccine that fails to prevent infection, illness or disease transmission, and which has not undergone long-term safety testing, proves to, well, fail in preventing infection, illness, or disease transmission. 

Yeah, she's a trooper. 

And did we mention, the so-called "vaccine" has debilitating side effects.

How Lord Sumption, Former Justice of the UK Supreme Court, Gets It Right and Wrong on the UK's Response to Covid-19

In this interview with Freddie Sayers, Lord Sumption, former UK Supreme Court Justice, makes two major points.

First, that enforced lockdown unjustifiably undermines the conventions that have made Britain a free society. Therefore, he urges people to adhere to the tradition of freedom and defy lockdown laws.

Second, he argues that making the possession of a vaccine passport necessary to dining at a restaurant, travelling by bus, rail or air, or entering the supermarket is a reasonable requirement of the state.

On the first point, Sumption is correct, although his encouragement of civil disobedience is not the courageous suggestion one might think, since young people in large numbers have displayed a contempt for lockdowns from the outset.

On the second point Sumption is dead wrong. To make a vaccine passport a necessity for participation in normal social and business life amounts to making vaccination mandatory. That is, he is arguing for laws to make it compulsory to accept an experimental vaccine which has not been thoroughly tested for effectiveness, even, let alone potential harms.

That is an extraordinarily totalitarian position to take, especially when it is realized that the novel RNA so-called vaccines are known to have limited effectiveness, but potentially disastrous negative effects.

Concerning potential negative consequences, it should be noted that:

1. Inoculation with RNA “vaccines” induce production of antibodies to the Covid-19 spike protein, which is a short-lived response that will provide immunity to illness from Covid infection for perhaps as little as only three to six months — meaning that repeated RNA inoculation will be necessary to maintain effectiveness.

2. Unlike vaccines previously developed, RNA “vaccines” do not activate immune responses, e.g., a T-cell response, that prevent Covid infection. That is why Anthony Fauci has acknowledged that Covid RNA “vaccines”, while preventing disease manifestation, may not prevent disease transmission. That means that the RNA “vaccines” may make one an asymptomatic, but infectious, carrier of the virus.

3. Because the RNA “vaccines” have not undergone long-term testing, it is unknown what long-term adverse effects they may have. Potential adverse long term effects are, however, far from inconceivable: Antibody-Dependent-Enhancement (of viral infectivity and disease severity) anyone? Or maybe you'd care to risk a touch of prion disease, the thing you get from eating mad cows or the brains of kuru-afflicted humans.

These risks may be low, but a small risk of a world-wide health catastrophe amounts to a serious matter. So no, Lord Sumption, you can stuff your vaccine passport.

Related:

The Bezos Post: Anti-vaccine extremism is akin to domestic terrorism

‘Vaccine apartheid’

When the Star-Belly Sneetches had frankfurter roasts Or picnics or parties or marshmallow toasts, They never invited the Plain-Belly Sneetches. They left them out cold, in the dark of the beaches. They kept them away. Never let them come near. And that’s how they treated them year after year.

5 ways they’re trying to trick you into taking the Covid “vaccine”

COVID-19 MRNA SHOTS ARE LEGALLY NOT VACCINES

If you die from Coronavirus ‘vaccine’, your life insurance won’t pay as it’s an ‘experimental medical intervention’

How The Fight Over American Freedom Will Probably Escalate

How the future of the world will unfold is always vastly uncertain. Yet there are times when a world-shaking change in the direction of affairs seems inevitable. The jostling for power among the imperialist states of Europe in the years before World War 1, for example, left few in doubt that something had to give, though few imagined how radical or how bloody would be the transition to a new world order headed not by any of the great imperial powers of that era, Great Britain, Germany, France or Russia, but by a former colony, the upstart United States of America.  Today, we appear to be on the brink of another global transition driven not only by the rise of other formerly oppressed countries, including the vastly populous nations of China and India, but by the astounding changes in ways of life both economic and social wrought by the last 100 years' advancement of science and technology. Thus, we hear from many quarters imaginative accounts of the coming Great Reset, of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and even of the colonization of other worlds. Who knows how things will turn out, yet the short-term projection of events within the US entitled: How The Fight Over American Freedom Will Probably Escalate, to which we have linked below, provides what seems a plausible indication of the scope and potential violence of events to come even within the borders of existing states.

By Brandon Smith

I have to say, I continue to see a divergence in what the elites clearly wanted to happen vs. what has actually happened. If the Event 201 pandemic war game on a coronavirus outbreak, held two months before the actual outbreak occurred in China, is any indication, then the globalists greatly overestimated the fear effect of Covid.

They predicted at least 65 million deaths from a coronavirus outbreak, but over a year has passed since the pandemic went international and the official death count stands at 2.5 million, with over 40% of deaths in the US attributed to nursing home patients that were ALREADY dying from preexisting conditions. Removing suspect nursing home deaths from the equation, the death count is probably closer to 1.5 million, again, if we adhere to official estimates.

To put this number in perspective, the CDC states that global deaths from the flu virus peak at around 649,000 depending on the year. Deaths from the flu and pneumonia reach as high as 1.4 million globally per year. Studies funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation find annual pneumonia death stats that are comparable to the CDC’s. Yet, we never saw Bill Gates calling for economic lockdowns, mask mandates and medical passports because of the flu or pneumonia. Why is that?

Read more