Implementing the Vaccine Passport Mandate

Related:

UK Approaches Covid Herd Immunity 

Liberal Author Naomi Wolf Warns 'Vaccine Passports' Are the 'End of Human Liberty in the West'

Cuomo Dictatorship:
SICK: New York Senate Passes Law to DETAIN “Contagious” People

Biden regime wants to mandate COVID-19 “vaccine passport” for all Americans but continues to oppose voter ID

Good Job Biden:

 Related: 

Biden WANTED A Border Crisis — Demanded An ‘Unrelenting Stream’ Of Illegals ‘Storming The Border’ To Make ‘Caucasians The Minority’

Vaccine Passport, Anyone?

In my possibly warped opinion, the best thing about an article at Zero Hedge is usually the comments.

 
For example, the comments slamming Joe Scarborough for slamming "Idiots" Who Oppose Covid Vaccine Passports seemed to me to be particularly apt, revealing as they do the apparent illogicality of vaccinated people demanding  protection from the unvaccinated, whereas it should surely be the other way around, since the vaccine, while suppressing the symptoms of disease, prevents neither infection nor transmission.

For example:

 Talk about illogical. Hey moron, if the vaccine works, then it shouldn't matter what someone that hasn't been vaccinated does. The unvaccinated are the one supposedly taking the risk.

-------

But "the experts" have said that even if you get the vaccine you still have to wear face coverings, socially distance 6 feet (or is it now 3 feet?) and stay at home.

Which might be reasonable because the "vaccine" does not prevent you from getting the covid. It only lessens the symptoms if you do get it.

Now, with the "vaccine passport" that all goes away?

So many mixed messages.

And it is true; Dr. Fauci looks like the 80 year old version of the Mad Magazine icon

-------

By what authority does ANY government agency issue passports for movement within the Continental United States? Under ANY circumstances? For ANY reason?
They want marshal law but under another name thinking that will fool everybody into believing its legal.

-------

Vaccine passports for Americans, while millions of unknown illegal aliens walk across the border and are just set free into the country. So, what does he have to say about kids in cages, in one big concentration camp, that is a mega/ultra/max/best-of-best super spreader event? I'm confused, democrats said 6 people couldn't gather for Christmas, but now democrats have thousands literally laying on each other.

------- 

You vote for Leftists, you get Leftism.

Their hypocrisy is astounding...

No voter ID necessary BUT you need a vaccine passport to access your Rights and Freedoms...?

The Left assumes the Non-Left does not want something...so they demand it be mandatory for everyone...they themselves will harm themselves as long as it harms their political adversaries as well.

Great business model.

Related: 

The Day that Trump Panicked, and Wrecked His Presidency

What is the End Game for COVID19 Black Ops?

RAT DELAYS COVID 19 VACCINE

The “Unvaccinated” Question

We Must Not Be Forced Into Vaccinating Our Children From COVID

Disposable blue face masks found to contain toxic, asbestos-like substance that destroys lungs

Vitamin D deficiency is the primary cause of covid hospitalizations and deaths

Dozens in Central Florida contract COVID-19 after being fully vaccinated

And the good news - or a suggestion of good news, anyhow:

CDC director: Data suggests vaccinated people don't carry COVID-19

And this:

Just 100 vaccinated Washington State residents test positive for COVID-19

But:

Covid Vaccine Nonsense

North Carolina College Professor DEAD After Johnson and Johnson COVID Shot

Vengeance or Blackmail: Harry and Meghan Hire Copyright Owner and Producer of Movie Claiming Queen Elizabeth Ordered the Murder of Harry's Mother, Diana, Princess of Wales

Ben Browning, the film producer just hired by Harry and Meghan to run their film production company, produced, and owns copyright to, Inquest, an undistributed movie claiming that Harry's mother, Princess Diana, was murdered on the order of Britain's Head of State, Queen Elizabeth II. From that, the only reasonable inference is that Harry and Meghan are either out for vengeance, or exploring the possibilities of blackmail. 

This can't have a happy ending. 

Politicians Cannot Eliminate a Virus

The problem for politicians now is to reverse course without losing their jobs.

Goodbye to Stability

In December 2019, I was buying crappy spruce/pine two by six lumber from Home Depot for $4.95 a piece. Today, just fifteen months later, the price is $11.55.

Alex Salmond, former leader of the Scottish National Party launched Alba, his own Scotch separatist party, to contest the forthcoming Scotch election, in an attempt to unseat the Scottish National (i.e., separatist) Party. 

But one thing that has not changed is that some Scotch Nat will probably tell me "Scotch is a drink," which it certainly is, but it is also an English term for things Scotch — or Scottish as the Scotch insist — and English happens to be the language I'm using here. 

Tesla's stock market capitalization still exceeds the value of all other car companies combined, despite near zero profits, a price earnings multiple of around 1000 (assuming that Tesla's reported profits are not as fake as its "full self-driving" software), and a collapse in European market share to under 10%. So anyone who thinks Tesla is a solid, stable, long-term investment, should probably give that thought further thought.

The English nation, now largely ruled by Indian ex-patriates, are to be denied the freedom to travel abroad either for edification or enjoyment, such travel being now subject to a five-thousand-pound fine. However, the penalty can, obviously, be avoided by remaining abroad forever, which may be the best option.

Having been outbid by Britain and the US for the untested Covid vaccine of questionable efficacy, the EU has now abandoned the sanctity of contract by seizing vaccine manufactured in the EU under contract to the British Government.

Meantime, Prince Harry, Sixth in line to the throne, continues his campaign to denigrate the British monarchy as racist, no fair (the bastards cut off my money and free security detail), and just generally, pathetic trapped animals.

At a time of such turbulence, one wonders if it can be long before white people resume killing one another, probably in the name of anti-racism, in a resumption of the 1914-1944 European civil war? 

The Ukies seem keen to have at it and the Biden Administration is in full support:

"The United States continues to stand with Ukraine and its allies and partners today, as it has from the beginning of this conflict. On this somber anniversary, we reaffirm a simple truth: Crimea is Ukraine," the Biden administration said on Feb.26.

"The United States does not and will never recognize Russia’s purported annexation of the peninsula, and we will stand with Ukraine against Russia’s aggressive acts." 

Meantime, the US Army is preparing to deploy, hypersonic missiles in Europe that can reach Russian targets in five minutes. In response, the Russians will presumably launch on warning. Is that suicidal, or what?

Oh, and the Chinese are now whinging about a US blood debt. 

Related:

Bill Vallicella: Is There a Political 'Use it or Lose it' Principle?

Pat Buchanan: Why Putin’s Pipeline Is Welcome in Germany

Paul Antonopoulos: Britain To Intensify Its Activities Against Russia (while cosying up to China)

With no money, an ineffective navy, and plans to reduce the ground forces by about 10,000 soldiers that will bring the British military to its smallest size in two hundred years, it is not clear how London can achieve its great ambition of surrounding Russia in the Arctic, Baltic Sea, Western Balkans and the Black Sea.

Milton Friedman on Donahue - 1979

Milton Friedman on Donahue #2

One Year to Flatten Life as we Knew it

By Rob Slane

The Blogmire Blog, March 22, 2021: It is a year since we embarked on an untried, untested, unscientific, draconian and frankly mad medical, social, economic and psychological experiment on millions of people. On the day we were thrust into this folly I wrote, “So that seems to be that. The end of Britain as we knew it.” All that has taken place since has, I believe, confirmed that, and my only surprise is that millions of people still cling to the bizarre idea that Lockdowns were based on science, that they were necessary, that they have been effective, and that we have a benevolent Government whose aim has been to keep us all safe. None of these things are true.

A Brief Recap of What Has Taken Place

You will search in vain for pre-2020 medical and scientific literature advocating the mass quarantining of healthy people as an appropriate response to a pandemic. In fact, after a panicked Mexican Government flirted with the idea for five whole days during the 2009 Swine Flu outbreak (ending it once it was realised how devastating it would be), the Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO) at the time, Dr Margaret Chan, explicitly warned against such destructive measures being used:

“In this regard, let me make a strong plea to countries to refrain from introducing measures that are economically and socially disruptive, yet have no scientific justification and bring no clear public health benefit.”

So this disruptive, unscientific measure, with no clear public health benefit was quietly buried and forgotten about. Until, that it is, it was implemented in January 2020, in the Chinese province of Hubei, on the orders of Xi Jinping, leader of one of the most totalitarian regimes on the planet, as the lawyer Michael Sanger details in great depth here.

One might have expected the WHO to take the same line as Dr. Chan in 2009, yet by February it had inexplicably changed its pandemic response guidance, on the flimsiest and most unreliable evidence, bringing it into line with the Wuhan decree.

One might then have expected Western countries to reject this tyrannical approach, but shockingly they did not. In Britain, the perfectly sensible Pandemic Preparedness Strategy the Government had had in place since 2011, which stressed the absolute importance of ensuring minimal disruption to society, even during a virus outbreak that might take 315,000 lives in a 15 week period, was binned. Why? That is the single most important question to which we need answers, but I think that Professor Neil Ferguson gave us a big clue in his interview with The Times in December:

“They [the Chinese] claimed to have flattened the curve. I was skeptical at first. I thought it was a massive cover-up by the Chinese. But as the data accrued it became clear it was an effective policy. But it’s a communist one-party state, we said. We couldn’t get away with it in Europe, we thought. And then Italy did it. And we realized we could.”

His claim of flattening the curve is a red-herring. His comment that they realised they could get away with implementing the tactics of a despotic regime is not.

Having been failed by the WHO and the Government, surely the British people would not fall for something so self-evidently absurd as prohibiting millions of perfectly healthy people from coming into contact with other healthy people? Surely the spirit that had made this country one of the freest nations on earth would kick in?

Sadly, and bafflingly, no. The British people, through a combination of being bombarded with fear, hysteria and outright lies on an unprecedented scale, meekly submitted to these despotic decrees, believing them to be something to do with being kept safe.

The Lie of Asymptomatic Transmission and the Myth of Half a Million Deaths

The biggest lie by far is that of asymptomatic transmission. Indeed, it may one day become known as the biggest lie, told to the largest number of people, in the shortest space of time. The claim was based chiefly on an incident in Germany, where a Chinese lady, who was thought to have been asymptomatic, was said to have spread the illness. However, it subsequently turned out that she did in fact have symptoms, but had suppressed them with medication. Yet that was scarcely reported on, and by that time the myth that this was some kind of new, mystical disease that could be spread by people with no symptoms had been born, and with it the basis for the Lockdowns, masks, and the myriad of other bizarre, dystopian restrictions placed upon us. Later in the year, a huge study of 10 million people in Wuhan showed zero cases of asymptomatic spread, but as you can probably guess this was entirely ignored by Governments and media around the world.

What of Professor Ferguson’s claim of 510,000 deaths? This remains the basis for the claim of Lockdown supporters that there would have been hundreds of thousands more deaths had we not locked down. Apart from the fact that the UK is currently fifth on the worldwide deaths per million table having had the third most stringent Lockdown on planet earth, according to the University of Oxford, and that countries who did not lock down have fared no worse, is there anything else that we can point to, to show the fallacy of Professor Ferguson’s doomsday prophecy?

Why yes there is, and it is in fact contained within Professor Ferguson’s report itself. He arrived at his figure of 510,000 dead for a “no-restrictions” scenario by estimating that 81% of the population would become infected, and by assuming an Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) of Covid-19 at 0.9%. However, in October, arguably the world’s foremost epidemiologist, John Ioannidis, of Stanford University, California, published a definitive study into the IFR of Covid-19. He calculated that the median rate was 0.23%, not 0.9%, as Ferguson had assumed, and his work was accepted and approved by the WHO.

This is very important: If Ferguson had used the IFR number of 0.23%, rather than 0.9%, guess what number of deaths he would have arrived at? The answer is around 127,000. Which is mighty interesting, since the total number of “official” deaths from Covid-19, at the time of writing, is 126,172. In other words, if Ferguson had used the correct IFR, the number of deaths he would have predicted in a scenario with no Lockdown would have been the same number of official deaths that we’ve actually had with the 3rd most stringent Lockdown on earth. Of course, I’m well aware that those 126,000 or so deaths were not all from Covid-19, but Lockdown supporters claim they were and so it’s for them to explain how this number is currently the same as Ferguson’s study would have predicted for a non-Lockdown situation, had he used the correct IFR.

That Lockdowns have not saved lives ought to be obvious. The virus was known since early March 2020 to overwhelmingly kill the elderly with comorbidities, and so resources could and should have been targeted to protect such people. Yet the scattergun approach that was taken of quarantining everyone is not — by definition — a targeted approach. And so the irony is that with all the absurd calls for healthy people to change their whole way of life to protect the vulnerable, what actually happened is the healthy had their lives utterly overturned, and the vulnerable were left to die.

The Destructive Power of Lockdowns

So much for the futility of Lockdowns to do good, what about their destructive power? This cannot be overstated. They are destroying lives. They are destroying livelihoods. They are destroying jobs. They are destroying businesses. They are destroying education. They are destroying churches. They are destroying trust. They are destroying mental health. They are destroying marriages. They are destroying relationships. They are destroying communities. They are destroying the idea that the police serve the people. They are destroying the rule of law. They are destroying free Britain.

Time and space will not suffice to tell of the destruction to the delicate balances of life in the medical sphere (especially weakened immune systems), the social sphere, the psychological sphere and the economic sphere, or the slide to a Transhumanist future brought about by the incessant calls for humans to stay away from other humans, and the bizarre ritual of covering the human face — the most immediate and important physical manifestation of the Imago Dei — with useless bits of cloth.

To those who have acquiesced in this, I would just ask this: Do you still not see what you have done? Do you still not see what it is you have supported?

The Britain that existed prior to March 2020, or which many of us thought existed, is gone. The Britain, in which we took freedom for granted, is gone. We have entered a very different future, and what is more, the vast majority of people seem to have welcomed it. Worse than this, we are being ushered into a Transhumanist Technocracy, where we are not seen as human, made in the image of God, but merely as potential virus carriers, digital ID numbers, drones fit to be tracked and traced, fit to be watched and ordered about by the dystopian technocrats who are building their Medical Despotism around us, but not considered worthy to live quiet and peaceful lives, going about our lawful business, living life without interfering overlords meddling in every aspect of it.

Why has this happened?

For the first few months I hedged my bets between the idea that the continuance of these measures was down to politicians trying to cover up for a monumental blunder, or that it was part of something far more nefarious. And whilst I am still unclear on the origins, for me the “covering up for a big mistake” possibility became untenable in October, with the release of The Great Barrington Declaration. This was a scientifically sound, medically robust, intellectually credible way out of the crisis that had been created. It was an open door for the British Government, along with others around the world, to walk through and save face. But what actually happened is they either ignored it or, in the case of Comrade Hancock, actively ridiculed it.

I think it obvious by now that there is something far more nefarious going on. But how to explain it? Some imagine that this must require some Dr Evil character, pulling the strings and making his puppets all dance to the same tune. I don’t believe this to be so. Anyone who has even the most cursory knowledge of politics over the past two decades must have noticed that almost all the people who rise to the top have broadly the same ideology. They think the same things. They mouth the same platitudes. They walk the same walk. And if you don’t think, speak or walk like them, why you’ll never be invited to the party. It is fairly obvious that many of these people have seen Covid-19 as an opportunity to increase their power, to control people, and to remake society in their own hideous image.

But that’s not all. I have seen endless disquieting comments – echoing my own thoughts – from both Christians and non-Christians, that the inexplicably bizarre reaction to what happened was as if millions of people have been put under some kind of spell. On this, it would be well to remember that there are things that go on which are well beyond our ability to explain by purely human reason and human actions:

“For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places” (Ephesians 6:1).

Looking to the Future

Having been lulled and propagandised into the acceptance of measures that are not only futile in and of themselves, but which have destroyed the idea of what we might call normal life, millions have now been lulled into the idea that rushed, untried, untested “vaccines”, which are not due to finish their clinical trials until 2023 (see links to Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Moderna trials), are some sort of salvation and way back to normal. But as the news in recent days has shown, they are in for a big disappointment. Your overlords do not want to let you return to normal. They have the bit between their teeth, and I don’t think they are about to let this opportunity go.

What we are seeing is far bigger, far more comprehensive, far more awful than most of us can comprehend. As Naomi Wolf summed up in a fantastic commentary on the situation recently:

“But this time we do not just face a war on freedom. This time we face a war on human beings, and on all that makes us human.”

Indeed. From Lockdowns to social distancing to masks, humanity and what it means to be human is under attack. There is but one peaceful way out of this Transhumanist Technocratic future: individuals, churches and nations need to repent before God, and having repented they need to plead with Him for deliverance from this judgement, and that he will re-establish truth, reality, and what it actually means to be human, in a world that has forgotten these things. The hour is late. The need really is urgent.

Related: 

Victor Davis Hanson: Follow The ‘Science,’ They Said

Kit Knightly: UK Lockdown One Year On: It Doesn't Work, It Never Worked, & It Wasn't Supposed To Work

The New Normal “Reality” Police

 By C.J. Hopkins:

So, according to Facebook and the Atlantic Council, I am now a “dangerous individual,” you know, like a “terrorist,” or a “serial murderer,” or “human trafficker,” or some other kind of “criminal.” Or I’ve been praising “dangerous individuals,” or disseminating their symbols, or otherwise attempting to “sow dissension” and cause “offline harm.”

Actually, I’m not really clear what I’m guilty of, but I’m definitely some sort of horrible person you want absolutely nothing to do with, whose columns you do not want to read, whose books you do not want to purchase, and the sharing of whose Facebook posts might get your account immediately suspended. Or, at the very least, you’ll be issued this warning:

Now, hold on, don’t click away just yet. You’re already on whatever website you’re reading this “dangerous,” “terrorist” column on (or you’re reading it in an email, probably on your phone), which means you are already on the official “Readers of Mass-Murdering Content” watch-list. So you might as well take the whole ride at this point.

Read more

Related:

Rob Slane: One Year To Flatten Life As We Knew It

Why You Must Get Vaccinated

●”If I get vaccinated can I stop wearing a mask?”

Government: “NO”

●”If I get vaccinated will the restaurants, bars, schools, fitness clubs, hair salons, etc. reopen and will people be able to get back to work like normal?” 

Government: “NO”

●”If I get vaccinated will I be resistant to Covid?”

Government: “Maybe. We don’t know exactly, but probably not.” 

●”If I get vaccinated, at least I won’t be contagious to others – right?”

Government: “NO. the vaccine doesn’t stop transmission.” 

●”If I get vaccinated, how long will the vaccine last?”

Government: “No one knows. All Covid “vaccines” are still in the experimental stage.”

● “If I get vaccinated, can I stop social distancing?”

Government: “NO”

● “If my parents, grandparents and myself all get vaccinated can we hug each other again?”

Government: “NO”

● “So what’s the benefit of getting vaccinated?” 

Government: “Hoping that the virus won’t kill you.”

●”Are you sure the vaccine won’t injure or  kill me?” 

Government: “NO”

●”If statistically the virus won’t kill me (99.7% survival rate), why should I get vaccinated?”

Government: “To protect others.”

●”So if I get vaccinated, I can protect 100% of people I come in contact with?” 

Government: “NO”

● “If I experience a severe adverse reaction, long-term effects (still unknown) or die from the vaccine will I (or my family) be compensated from the vaccine manufacture or the Government?” 

Government: “NO – the government and vaccine manufacturer’s have 100% zero liability regarding this experimental drug”

Source

Related:

The Latest: Vaccinated don't need masks at work in Anchorage

534 Dead 330,063 Reported Injured following COVID19 Experimental Vaccine Injections in the U.K.

When it comes to vaccines, suddenly “from vs with” matters again

Gov. Ron DeSantis holds a public health roundtable at the Florida State Capitol on the effectiveness of Covid lockdowns, mask wearing, and contact tracing

Lockdowns killed countless thousand due to missed cancer diagnoses (over a million cases in the US) and deferred treatment of cancer and other serious diseases, yet in the US, lockdown states had rates of Covid deaths no lower than those of non-lockdown states.

School closures achieved essentially nothing to restrict the spread of the disease, while inflicting serious loss of opportunity on children. Long-distance learning was a failure; school closures resulted in increased cases of child abuse, and imposed a particularly heavy burden on low-income households.

There is no evidence that mask wearing restricts viral spread, but it can induce overconfidence leading to behaviour that promotes viral spread. For children masking is psychologically harmful. During exercise, mask wearing is harmful.

Based on experience with other corona viruses, it is most probably that those who have had Covid will have persistent, effective and life-long immunity from severe disease and death from Covid.

The response to the virus by most governments worldwide has displayed a complete rejection of decades of relevant biological and immunological knowledge.

Vaccine passports are a bad idea because they cause increased resistance to vaccination, moreover, those who have already had the infection derive no benefit from vaccination, as they already have durable and robust immunity.

Most infections are mild or asymptomatic, and asymptomatic cases cause little disease spread.

Severe disease is limited almost entirely to a small and well identified section of the population, namely the elderly and those with other conditions.

Covid models upon which public policy responses in the Western world were based are inprecise at best and highly misleading at worst, and they drove many mistaken policy decisions.

Media coverage involved deliberate distortion of the data, and a serious lack of balance. On social media there was overt censorship of any who opposed the media's control over the message.

Those who advocated a strategy of focused protection of the most vulnerable were treated by the media as renegades, crazy people not following "the science."

The focus on lockdowns without regard for the collateral damage was an abandonment of the principles of public health management that must consider all health consequences, both physical and mental, of public policy.

The assumption that lockdowns would protect anyone, including the most vulnerable, proved false as the tremendous Covid death toll in care homes proved.

The failure of public health measures in the face of the Covid pandemic means that there has been a loss of trust in public health authorities: trust that must be rebuilt if we are to cope effectively with a future, and possibly much more serious, health emergency. 

Related: 

Israel Shamir: Covid: Starters or Main Course

“The Great Reset” Is Here: “Insane Lockdown” of the Global Economy, “The Green Agenda”

WAYNE ROOT: Why Isn’t Everyone in Florida Dead, or in the Hospital?

Naomi Wolf: The end of America

New York COVID variant could infect the vaccinated

Britain's Catastrophic Lockdown

DR JOHN LEE: My darkest predictions have come true... the effects of Covid lockdowns are catastrophic

Did Public Policy Increase Covid Infectivity and Virulence

Mutant variations and the danger of lockdowns

By Jemma Morris:

Have non-pharmaceutical interventions, including lockdowns and social distancing, enabled more dangerous virus variants to thrive?

At the beginning of 2020 we embarked upon a nationwide epidemiological experiment in an attempt to reduce the mortality burden of the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus. The premise of the experiment, though never formally defined, was to trial the efficacy of non-pharmaceutical interventions with respect to the infection rate and subsequent death toll of an airborne respiratory virus.

The hypothesis was treated as a foregone conclusion and presented with little doubt. A significant reduction in person-to-person interactions within a population will lead to a decreased infection rate and reduce the number of deaths associated with the virus. The scientific community were so confident in this hypothesis that they did not present it as a hypothesis at all. The experiment was not defined as an experiment. The resulting data was subsequently ignored.

No matter how certain we are of the outcome, good science is about asking questions

It’s easy to see why. Given our most basic understanding of how viruses spread from one person to another, any measures that suppress the transmission of viruses should inevitably lead to a reduction in associated mortality. But given that we have never actually investigated this correlation in a real-world setting, perhaps assumptions based on our “most basic understanding” are not sufficient. No matter how certain we are of the outcome, good science is about asking questions. If the answers contradict your assumptions then those answers should bring about a shift in your understanding.

One year into the great experiment, we have a wealth of global data to inform our conclusions. This data largely contradicts the confident hypothesis with which we embarked upon this journey and has therefore been ignored. Scientists and politicians have clutched at straws, manipulated data or simply ignored the evidence in an attempt to safeguard the integrity of the original idea.

Read more

Related: 

Spacing COVID-19 vaccine doses has epidemiological benefits, but longer-term outcomes depend on immunity robustness

Epidemiological and evolutionary considerations of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dosing regimes

Covid and the 'Great Reset' — the Animal Farm version

The Most Powerful Man in the World

 

How it really happened:

Related: 

How to ensure stairs are safe for someone with dementia

Will Vaccines End the Pandemic?

From Britain, where 35% of the population has now been jabbed with one of the novel RNA "vaccines," the indications are that the treatment works. Among the "vaccinated" both cases and hospitalization rates are falling. 

Thus: 

Even a single dose of the Pfizer or AstraZeneca vaccines helps reduce the incidence of both severe illness and hospitalizations, 

Even a single dose also helps lower mortality.

Still, there are some who say it is too soon to declare victory over Covid. Indeed, it has been argued that mass vaccination during a pandemic is precisely the wrong thing to do.

Why?

Because it will drive viral immune escape, making the virus resistant to, not only the novel "vaccines," but also the body's natural defense mechanisms.

Perhaps the most vocal exponent of this concern is the highly qualified vaccine expert, Dr. G. vanden Bossche. In this interview he expounds the reason for his concern:

Or to summarize Dr. vanden Bossche's thesis, the mRNA vaccines:

(1) suppress disease expression without preventing infection and virus transmission.

(2) induce antibodies effective against current viral strains, while suppressing the production of natural, long-lived, broad-spectrum antibodies effective against novel virus strains. 

(3) because of (1) and (2), vaccines drive the survival and spread of novel viral strains against which the current mRNA vaccines will be ineffective.

Those, collectively, must be the mechanisms that account, in whole or in part, for the phenomenon of antibody-determined enhancement, or ADE -- the enhancement being of viral infectivity and disease severity. 

So are the Brits really winning the war on Covid?

Or are they merely enjoying hubris before nemesis in the form of a renewed and more deadly "vaccine"-induced epidemic?

Ominously, Zero Hedge reports: COVID Cases Are Spiking In A Dozen States With High Vaccination Rates but the details provided are too few to draw any conclusion as to whether these trends could be an early indication of ADE in action.

What is not certain the question of vaccine safety is that expert opinion is uncertain. Thus for example, a review article published only five months ago in the journal Frontiers in Immunology concluded with the following statement:

Potential disease enhancement and other theoretical safety concerns related to each type of vaccine need to be understood and carefully monitored for, while potential suboptimal immunity may need to be overcome. Certain vulnerable populations may respond poorly to vaccination, or the vaccine may predominantly protect against severe disease, rather than infection. If T cells prove critical for protection, it will be necessary to ensure that the included T cell epitopes are recognized by enough HLA types to ensure worldwide coverage.

So if you've already been vaccinated, thanks and congratulations for taking part in the world's largest ever experimental vaccine trial. 

Related: 

Norwegian Doctor Claims To Find Link Between AstraZeneca Vaccine And Rare Blood Clots

ITS TIME – VIDEO!! BANNED EVERYWHERE – PLEASE WATCH – LAST HOPE VIDEO!!

Share: Facebook Twitter Google Plus Myspace MSN Live Yahoo LinkedIn Orkut Digg Delicious

Understanding the Covid Coup

 Rob Slane: 

We Willingly Gave Up Liberty, Yet Are Shocked to Find Out We Are Less Free

Through fear and hysteria, millions actually believed the authorities when they put forward the absurd suggestion that they could “Control the Virus.” In fact, what they then proceeded to do was “Control the People.” The idea that Lockdowns “Control the Virus” and reduce mortality has been shown by more than 30 studies to be a fallacy; whereas the truth that Lockdowns “Control the People” is blindingly obvious, and should be apparent to everyone after a year of often mad restrictions that have curtailed perfectly normal activities....

AIER: 

Lockdowns Do Not Control the Coronavirus: The Evidence

The use of universal lockdowns in the event of the appearance of a new pathogen has no precedent. It has been a science experiment in real time, with most of the human population used as lab rats. The costs are legion.

The question is whether lockdowns worked to control the virus in a way that is scientifically verifiable. Based on the following studies, the answer is no and for a variety of reasons: bad data, no correlations, no causal demonstration, anomalous exceptions, and so on. There is no relationship between lockdowns (or whatever else people want to call them to mask their true nature) and virus control....

Bloomberg News: Covid no more deadly than the flu 

to those under 40 and barely more so to those over 40:

After you have examined that graph showing essentially zero Covid 19 mortality in infants and children under the age of 14, consider this insane fact:Moderna starts COVID-19 vaccine trial in infants and young children     Yet 96% of Covid-19-related excess deaths in Europe were in people over 70 years old. So what did Western governments do? While the vaccine vendors were intent on vaccinating babies who are naturally immune to the disease, they locked up the entire population, while forcing Covid-19-infected people from hospital into care homes for the elderly, setting off one lethal epidemic after another and accounting for around half of all Covid-19 deaths. Brilliant: Well done BoJo, Justin, and Governor Cuomo of New York, etc.What other apparent lunacy did these governments commit? Well having stripped a large proportion of the population of their livlihood, governments compensated the people by handing out free money. In the process, Canada, for example, blew up a Government deficit of $20 billion dollars in 2019 to $382 billion (projected, underestimated, whatever) in 2020. In the US, the Feds printed so much money to buy votes and keep the terrorized population docile, that 40% of all US dollars ever created were created within the year. And that, surely, is the wonderful payoff for the Money Power. Massive money printing, equals inflation, which, wait for it, means a decline in real wages, something employers love. it also means a devaluation of debt, something so welcome to corporate borrowers everywhere. So if you think Covid only robbed you of a year of productive life, think again. If you're a worker, it likely has cost you a large chunk of future real earnings. Still, we can take comfort from the World Health Organizations statement on vaccine effectiveness:

Does it prevent infection and transmission?

We do not know whether the vaccine will prevent infection and protect against onward transmission. Immunity persists for several months, but the full duration is not yet known. These important questions are being studied.

LOL. That should give you confidence -- confidence that :"persists for several months." But after that, don't worry, they'll have another "jab" for you. In fact, before this is over you may find you've been transformed into a human pin cushion.

t 

f 

 

 

Canadian Doctors Explode Government-Directed Covid Scare Campaign

The main points:

# The PCR test used to determine cases overestimates by a factor of 30 to 1

# Asymptomatic spread is negligible to non-existent (so much for masking healthy people)

# Children under the age of 10 are rarely sick with Covid and thus do not transmit it, which means that elementary school closures are entirely unwarranted

# Mortality due to Covid among children under 18 is less than that from influenza

# The mRNA "vaccine" won't protect you from infection. At best, it will induce the production of antibodies that will save you from being sick from infection, such protection being good for no more than a few months, and perhaps being no good at all following infection by a novel Covid strain.

# Long-lasting protection from infection depends on T-cell immunity induced by a previous infection or a real vaccine. It is likely that 30 to 50% of the population have protection from infection by Covid due to T-cell immunity induced by past infection by a corona virus -- for example, certain common cold viruses.

# You can protect yourself from severe Covid by exercising out of doors (which means getting some sunlight with which to make Vitamin D), and supplementing your diet with vitamins C and D, zinc, and magnesium.

And remember that something like half of all serious Covid cases are hospital acquired according to this report from Scotland, and most other serious cases are acquired in care homes, so if you're neither in hospital nor in a care home your risk of serious illness from Covid is next to nothing.

Related:

***And from another Canadian doctor: “I have never seen a patient sick with COVID-19. We are being deceived and manipulated”***

Stay at Home – Protect the NHS – 100K Deaths: Is it all a lie? An analysis of ONS and NHS data

Welcome to the Upside Down

Nature Communications: Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China

300 asymptomatic cases (detection rate 0.303/10,000, 95% CI 0.270–0.339/10,000) were identified. There were no positive tests amongst 1,174 close contacts of asymptomatic cases.

 

C.J. Hopkins: The New Normal (Phase 2)

How to Rubbish the Covid Cops:

The Biden Administration and the Death of the American Republic

 

• This section of the Constitution says that the US will guarantee every state in this Union a Republican form of government – but the Democrats just stole the 2020 election. 
• The Constitution states the US will protect each state against invasion but the borders under the Democrats are wide open. 
• The Constitution protects every state against domestic violence but Democrat-led cities allow BLM and Antifa to burn them to the ground. 

It is clear Democrats will not enforce this one section in our Constitution, disregarding our Constitution and making it worthless.   Americans believe in the law, not the lawless Democrat destructive policies.  It’s time for our politicians to change and uphold our Constitution or be removed from government or arrested.

It’s time for Americans to decide, are we going to live in a lawless society or will we live according to the US Constitution.  The choice is ours.

Source