Canada's Reproductive Failure

 Canadians are a dying nation with a death rate twice the birth rate.

Canada's rapid population growth despite a dying population is driven by mass immigration.

The immigrants, no doubt good people for the most part, have no hereditary relationship with the historic Canadian nation. They are a replacement for the historic Canadian nation, which, under the psychopatic leadership of the Trudeauvian Liberal Party, is being quietly driven to extinction. 

For the survival of the Canadian nation, Canada needs not more immigrants but more babies. But this would cost. More maternity hospital beds, more schools and universities. Thus say the Trudeauvians, better to import people fully grown with expertise, diplomas and university degrees acquired at some other nation's expense. 

Thus Canada lives by the infusion of talent from other nations, the newcomers themselves becoming part of a dying nation. 

What to do?

The election of a Conservative government headed by Pierre Poilievre, the bastard child of an unmarried teenager, might be a good start. But what is the Conservative Party's population policy? Will a Tory government get the condom dispensers out of high school washrooms? Will they outlaw abortion as birth control?

Contrary to Trudeau's genocidal policy of mass immigration, Canada should slash immigration rates to improve employment opportunity and lower housing costs for the native-born, with positive effects on the fertility of native-born Canadians. Such measures should be maintained until such time as the fertility rate catches up with the death rate. The rest of the West, dying nations including Germany, Britain, France, Italy, and the United States, need to adopt similar measures. 

Here, for Germany, is how the West's drive for national suicide looks in a chart: 

Tucker Carlson: Native-Born Americans Are Being Replaced By Immigrants -- Same in Canada But More So

The situation in Canada is similar to that in the US as described by Tucker Carlson -- but worse.  

Except for immigration, Canada's population would be falling.

Without immigration, population maintenance requires a total fertility rate of 2.1. In 2023, Canada's total fertility rate was less than 1.5, 40% below the replacement rate and even lower than the American rate which in the same year was 1.62.

But despite the low fertility rate, Canada's population is growing. How come? Because of a massive influx of immigrants, at a rate that greatly exceeds the birthrate.

In 2023, births in Canada totalled 356,903, but there were 437,000 immigrants. That's 122 thousand immigrants in excess of births. 

 

Under Justin Trudeau, Canada's population policy is thus a policy of native population replacement. 

The deficit in Canadian fertility is intensified by immigrant competion for jobs and housing which lowers wages while raising housing costs.

Without decent incomes and the security of home ownership which good wages allow, many young Canadian couples defer starting a family or simply never make a start. Immigrants, of course, face the same problems. 

Thus Canada's Trudeauvian policy of mass immigration amounts to a program of national self-genocide, the native population being progressively replaced by people from elsewhere. For the most part, good people from elsewhere, no doubt, but they're not native-born Canadians.

What's the solution?

Simple

Cut the immigration rate by something like 90% and keep it at that greatly reduced rate until the Canadian total fertility rate rises from its current rate of less than 1.5 to the replacement rate of 2.1.

Canada: A Dying Nation

Post

See new posts

Conversation

Elon Musk

@elonmusk

Any nation with a birth rate below replacement will eventually cease to exist

=========================================================

Unless, like Canada, that nation's immigration rate exceeds its birth rate. Then "the nation" continues to exist, but in name only, and with a different people.

And just to be clear, Canada's birth rate is little more than half the replacement rate, but its immigration rate now exceeds the birth rate. Thus, between July 1, 2022 and June 30, 2023, there were an estimated 357,903 babies born in Canada, whereas immigration in 2023 was 445,000, a rate expected to reach half a million by 2025 and beyond.

Canada's national policies as they relate to support for family formation and immigration thus constitute a program of national self-genocide. So, goodbye historic Canadian nation. Welcome all you replacement people -- I, it should be acknowledged, being among them.

Related: 

Tucker Carlson: There Is Systemic Racism in the U.S. – Against Whites As in Trudeau's Canada

Canada: A Nation of Lemmings, Rushing to the Cliff Edge

An organization called The World Happiness Report has determined that, overall, Canada is a relatively happy place, ranking No. 15 out of 140 nations. 

How exactly do they know?

Easy. They asked people the "Cantril ladder life-evaluation question." 

LOL. 

Specifically, they asked a representative sample of around 1000 people in each country in each of three years the following question:

"Think of a ladder, with the best possible life for you being a 10 and the worst possible life being a 0. Now rate your own current lives on that 0 to 10 scale." 

On that basis, Canada ranked Nunber 15 out of 140 countries -- not bad  for a cold and mostly uninhabitable land headed by Justin Trudeau. 

Not so good is that, contrary to what one might expect, Canadian youth is a lot less happy that elderly Canadians. 

Based on the "happiness" of those over the age of 60, Canada ranked No. 8 among nations, but among those under 30, Canada's ranking fell 50 spots to No. 58 -- behind not only obviously nice places like Denmark, New Zealand (despite that woman), Switzerland, and war-torn Israel, but even behind such places as Nicaragua, Honduras, Bosnia, and Bulgaria. 

As a member of the "every morning when I wake up I know I'm a winner" class, I say with the authority of experience, that old age is no picnic.

So what, then, ails our Canadian youth? 

Easy to see. 

They are right royally screwed by Canada's criminally incompetant, or merely criminal economic and population policies. 

The results of said mismanagement?

Sky high real estate prices, an interest rate rocketing from 0.25% in 2022 to 4.5% now, and possibly headed higher as the bank of Canada seeks to throttle the Trudeau-massive-debt-based-spending-binge-induced inflation. 

Why do those economic stats matter to Canadians under 30?

Because those under 30's are the folks -- and the're not kids, seeking to form a household and raise a family. And here's how ordure-smeared the prospect is compared with the experience of these youngsters' happy elders. 

Today, the average Canadian home price is around $792,200, while median family income  is under $100,000, so the ratio of house price to young family income must be at least eight to one, and must, in fact, be much higher since incomes mostly rise with age. 

How does that compare with the conditions faced by today's happy oldsters at the time that most of them  bought a home? 

Well I won't lay out a lot of boring stats, but here in Victoria, BC, perhaps the nicest place to live anywhere in Canada, and in the suburb of Oak Bay, undoubtedly the most upscale neighborhood in Victoria, we purchased a modest home on a double-sized lot for $68,000 (lot value around $8,000). That was in 1974 when our joint, not-much-above-average, family income was $40,000: so a house price to family income of just 1.7. Today, 50 years later, that house is valued at just under two million with a ot value of about $1.6 million, or about 200 times what we paid for it. 

Now do you see why old folks are cheerful and the young are, um, well I don't use vulgar language here, but you see what I'm getting at. We bought a house, for what was, by today's standards, even after accounting for inflation, peanuts and for which we paid in cash from the savings from our modest earnings. But when we're dead, that house will likely go for millions to some hyper-mortgaged young couple. 

So, yeah, we oldsters are laughing and you youngsters are either weeping or just mad as Hell. 

Oh, and to toughen the struggle, the Trudeau genius administration has opened the floodgates to immigration, which is to reach a record 484,000 this year, rising to half a million next year. Thats 142,097 more than the number of Canadian births in 2023. And it's an influx of mostly young adults who will compete with Canada's young families not only for homes, but for jobs too. 

No wonder the Canadian fertility rate is in free-fall, reaching 1.1 in 2023, when the mere replacement rate would be 2.1. For most young Canadian adults, no family home means no family. Thus, under the present administration, Canada is a country bent on self-genocide. We are replacing ourselves with people from elsewhere. For the most part good people, no doubt. BUT THEY'RE NOT CANADIANS.

Not Canadians yet, that is. But they soon will be, and not only Canadians but the  majority and ultimately the replacement for the historic Canadian nation. 

Trump Addresses March for Life

Feminism and the Destruction of the Western Nations

An article at the Unz Review, entitled Women In Universities (IU’s Provost Lauren Robel, Dean Idie Kesner) Show Why Women In Universities Are Not A Good Thing argues that women are destroying academia through "female-typical behavior", a notion upon which he expands by quoting some person saying: 

... females become upset more easily, making it more difficult to engage in unemotional academic disputations, because their logic is more likely to be overwhelmed. Females are also more conformist than men, which militates against challenging received knowledge and thus discovering new things.

This is bunk. Yes, women are different from men, thank God. But that does not make them unfit for academia. What is destroying academia is a whole lot of things, including the fraudulence, dim-wittedness, and bureaucratic mentality of most of today's so-called academics. And, yes, feminism is a powerful corrosive of academic excellence, and indeed, of academic sanity. 

Let me explain.

In 1951 Charlotte Whitten became mayor of the city of Ottawa, the first women in Canada to hold the mayoralty of a major city. Today, she is remembered chiefly for her remark that:

For a woman to succeed in a man's world she needs to be twice as good as a man.

 At the time Mayor Whitten spoke, her words were largely true throughout the Western world. Then, for most women, the main career opportunity was motherhood, and to distinguish herself in that role, a woman needed to raise distinguished sons.

As an incentive to faithfully performing that essential service to the race and to civilization, women were provided with a considerable measure of economic security by virtue of marriage and divorce laws. Moreover, the absence of legal abortion services gave women a powerful incentive to seek marriage rather than casual sex.

But there were always women who pursued careers and demonstrated that, if not twice as good as a man, some could certainly match the achievements of men. In those days, therefore, it was the case that for a woman to become an academic was, in itself, evidence of real ability.

Today, the situation is totally different. Virtually all the protections provided to women who commit to the raising of children have been removed, while casual, safe and sterile sex has been facilitated and promoted by almost every public institution from parliaments to parish churches, and from the media to the medical profession.

The result? A feminist revolt manifest not in the Lysistratan refusal to provide husbands and lovers with sexual gratification, but in the truly wicked refusal to perpetuate the race, pursuing instead the financial security of a career and, in the case of the most able, power.

Western society is now well on the way to extinction, with fertility rates far below replacement and without the slightest prospect of recovery, the population deficit being made up by immigrants of mainly alien race, religion and culture. Feminists in academia, are among the principle agents of this disaster, relentlessly justifying and propagating their self-genocidal ideology. Meantime, of the native reproduction, this now depends heavily on the welfare class, as more intelligent women, propelled by the feminist ethic, pursue sterile self gratification through career success. 

The Suicide of the West, No. 93.

Daily Mail: Fertility rate for white women plummets BELOW the limit needed to maintain the population in every single US state Fertility rates for white women were down in every US state in 2017 - below the rate needed for the population to replace itself, a new report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reveals. However, among black and Hispanic women, fertility rates were up in 12 and 29 states, respectively. When researchers looked at fertility rates for women of all age groups and races, they found that the nationwide rate was 16 percent lower than what is considered the level for a population to replace itself. Experts say this is likely due to the fact that the large proportion of native-born women are having fewer children than before, while the much smaller proportion of immigrant-born women are having more children.

The story is the same for Europe but worse. Worse for the European race, that is. The Germans, the Italians, the Hungarians and sundry other Europeans fuck to hardly any productive effect, poor brainwashed, politically correct, self-genociding dupes. 

But, hey, we gotta have more girls' education, more girls in our front line fighting forces, more girl fire fighters, more girls running the big corporations and sitting on executive boards, more rights for queers, more transgenders, this last to be achieved, as necessary, by surgical and chemical means. The fact is, unless guys start having babies it's game over the Euros 'cos girls are just too busy doing the big jobs that white guys no longer have any right to hold.

And more children? Oh God no! Humans are a plague on the planet, at least white humans, you know, the privileged race. No, Whitey is slated for extermination. What do you think sex "ed." is all about other than to exterminate the white nations of the world. Meantime, no African nation is so stupid as to indulge in such self-destructive bollocks, they just go on multiplying, doubling their population every 30 years. 

Not for white genocide? But that's what the media you absorb every day have been telling you for years. You know, the trusted names, Time Magazine, the Economist (LOL), the BBC, Macleans, the Atlantic Monthly, the New York Times, the Globe and Mail, the Gruniard.

And it's what the school your kid goes to, assuming you have a kid, teaches: whitey is a disease on the face of the planet and must be eliminated by mass immigration, racial mixing and lethal propaganda. Diversity is good, except the white part of it, obviously. For whitey metissage is an obligation.

Same for Western civilization: it's gotta go. Christianity is the root of all evil, together with every other manifestation of Western culture: Shakespeare to be removed from the Eng. Lit. curriculum, Kipling a despicable racist never to be mentioned in polite society, Jane Austin to be removed from public libraries.

Either the Western nations get rid of the Treason class: the Mays, the Merkels, the Microns, the Clintons, the Obamas, and Justin, Canada-is-not-a -nation, Trudeau, or they die.

Vive les gilets jaunes.

Why Both Liberals and Conservatives Hate Trump and How Their Antagonism Hurts Canadians

Everyone hates Trump: Democrats and Republicans, Liberals and Conservatives. Paul Ryan, Justin Trudeau, Theresa May. They hate Trump because he is the enemy of the elite factions, aka, the Deep States, that rule the Western nations.

The Deep State despises the people, who they see as cattle to be controlled and exploited. The Deep State  rules not in the interests of the people, but to serve as  agents of the global Money Power.

Thus, as Justin Trudeau declared to the New York Times, the Canadian nation is defunct.

‘‘There is no core identity, no mainstream in Canada’... There are shared values* [which are] what make us the first postnational state.’’ Justin Trudeau — New York Times. *Such values to be dictated by the elite by means of school and media brainwashing, social media and search engine censorship, and by legal enforcement of political correctness through pseudo human rights tribunals, and other mechanisms of fake social justice.

Trump is a throwback. He is a King and Country ruler. The King protects the People, the People defend the King. Thus were nations long ruled by wise monarchs, Elizabeth I of England, for example, and later by aristocratic elites, as in the early days of Britain's parliamentary democracy.

To the globalist, Treason-Party elites that run the Western nations, nothing more catastrophic that the election of President Donald Trump can be conceived. What use to the International Money Power is a US Congressman if Trump can just slap a 25% tariff on any imported good he chooses, steel, machinery, computers and car parts, shirts and shoes and a thousand other things? Such actions disrupt the profitable employment of trillions invested in a world headed for global governance and the unrestricted international movement of capital, technology, goods and labor. What use are contribution to the Pierre Elliot Trudeau Foundation, or the appointment of former Canadian Prime Ministers to the boards of international companies if the Government of Canada caves to the Trump agenda?

For the Canadian people, however, what is bad for the elite in the Trump agenda is clearly good for them. Were Canada to seek a place within the American trade ring-fence, investment would boom as it is already booming in the US, labor markets would become tight, wages would rise. Inflation would pickup, as would interest rates, and Canada's grotesquely inflated housing market would slump. Houses would then be cheap again, young people would form households earlier, the national fertility rate would, heaven forbid, rise, and the need for mass replacement immigration would subside, as the  globalist-battered Canadian nation revived.

Related: 

IWB: Schweizer Exposes More Joe Biden Corruption — It’s ‘Going to be a Central Issue’ in 2020. “Corruption is being globalized.”

Jordan Peterson's hysterical rant about people of low IQ

Jordan Peterson is the University of Toronto psychology professor rightly applauded for his opposition to Canada's recently enacted law "to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code" (Bill C16) in such ways as to compel, among other things, the use of self-selected pronouns demanded by transgender and other minorities from the mundane Zie and Zim to such loony extremes as His Majesty and It's Serene Highness.

 Less well known are Peterson's ideas about intelligence. In the short video below, Peterson reveals his thinking on this topic as he describes what he calls a "horrifying thing", namely what he says is the finding of US Army psychologists who were "motivated to find an accurate predictor [of the competence of recruits], so they used IQ."

One of the most terrifying statistics I ever came across [related to] the rationale of the US armed forces for not inducting anyone with an IQ of less than 83. Lets just take that apart, because it's a horrifying thing. After 100 years, essentially, of careful statistical anaylsis, the armed forces concluded that if you had an IQ of 83 or less there wasn't anything you could be trained to do in the military at any level of the organization that wasn't positively counterproductive. OK, so what, 83, OK, yeah, one in ten, one in ten, that's one in ten people, and what that really means, as far as I can tell, if you imagine that the military is approximately as complex as the broader society, then there is no place in our cognitively complex society for one in ten people. So what are we going to do about that? The answer is, no one knows. It's a vicious problem. At that point, the interviewer interjects: It's hard to train people to become creative, adaptive, problem solvers. To which Peterson responds: It's impossible. You can't do it. It doesn't work. Sorry, it doesn't work.

So here is expressed a basic mistake underlying the IQ-ist creed: it is to assume what has to be demonstrated. Specifically, that IQ test scores are an accurate predictor of competence in the military or, as Peterson clearly implies, every other sphere of human activity.

But cursory examination reveals that everything Peterson is saying is obvious bunk. If, for example, ten percent of the US population is totally incompetent, then one should expect a floor to the unemployment rate of no less than 10%, whereas in fact, US unemployment is currently under four percent, while the unemployment rate for African Americans with an average IQ of 85, or barely above Peterson's threshold for total uselessness, is under 6%.

As for the claim that there is no place in "our cognitively complex society for one in ten people," what exactly is he suggesting? The thinking of those prewar Hitler admirers in the Anglo-American eugenics movement come to mind. That Peterson concludes that the existence of so many incompetent people is a "vicious problem," certainly suggests a willingness to consider extreme solutions.

But in any case, what did he mean by "our cognitively complex society"? Can a society even have cognitive features? Perhaps what he meant was our cognitively demanding society. But is it really? Is it harder to stay alive in a world of 24/7 shopping, homeless shelters, and food stamps than in prehistoric times? And even for those productively employed, how many have cognitively challenging jobs — store clerks? coffee-shop employees? gas station attendants? hospital orderlies? Or the lower ranks of academia, say 90% of college professors?

And what about the Africans? With a mean IQ 84, half the Nigerian population is close to, or below Peterson's competence threshold, yet Nigeria's population is booming. So who's gonna win the evolutionary race: IQ 98 Americans with their below replacement fertility, or Nigerians doubling their population every 30 years? Then there's the Mozambiquans, with a mean IQ of 64 despite a significant Euro-African population component and, like Nigerians, a fertility two and half times the replacement rate.

And, conclusively refuting Peterson's claim that men with an IQ of less than 83 are useless to the US military for anything whatever is the fact that a large proportion of the troops, 354,000 of them, that were sent by the US to fight in Vietnam had IQ's of around 70. To learn more search the Web for Project 100, and MacNamara's Morons.

Justin Trudeau: The Worst Canadian Prime Minister Since Pierrre Elliot Trudeau?

Stepping down as Prime Minister in December 2003, Jean Chrétien said he would, like British Prime Minister William Gladstone, come back at the age of 84 — which would be in 2018.

Although, presumably said in jest, Chétien's promise has gained plausibility with the passage of time.

Since Chrétien made way for his long-time Finance Minister, Paul Martin, Canada`s liberals have been beset by failure.

A Racist Joke That Serves a Good Moral Purpose

Here's a joke by someone commenting on the Irish Savant's blog. 

Question: What do you call a black woman who has had at least three abortions?

Answer: A crimefighter.

So what is the moral of the joke? That is revealed by another joke:

Question: What do you call a white woman who has had at least three abortions?
Answer: An anti-racism activist.

If you found the second joke funny, you are either an immigrant to Europe with a settler mentality or a European driven by media lies, advertising manipulation, Hollywood brainwashing, and twelve years of mandatory state propaganda in the guise of education to believe that opposing the racial and cultural destruction of your own people is racism.

If, however, you found the first joke funny, then you are among the minority of the European people with at least some small chance of success in the Darwinian struggle to perpetuate your own genes* among future generations of those residing in the land of your birth.

And here are some statistics (source):

In Europe, around 30 per cent of pregnancies end in abortion.

In Western Europe there were 12 abortions per 1,000 women in 2008, while in Eastern Europe at the same time there were 43.

However, Northern Europe (which includes the UK and Scandinavia) fared worse than the western region with 17 abortions per 1,000 women, which is on par with North America.

Thus it is abortion that makes the difference between a self-perpetuating society and a society engaged in self-genocide. The fertility of European women is currently 1.55 and falling, whereas the replacement rate is 2.1. If the 30% of pregnancies terminated by non-therapeutic abortion went to term, the European fertility rate would be 2.2, which would achieve near perfect population stability. As it is, the European population is growing rapidly due to mass immigration from Asia, the Middle East and Africa, most of the immigrants being  either of reproductive age or children and hence soon to be of reproductive age. These immigrants will thus contribute disproportionately to the next generation in Europe even if their fertility was no greater than that of Europeans. However, all immigrant groups have a higher fertility that indigenous European women, and in some cases their fertility is several times higher. For example, in Britain, women from Libya, a country deliberately turned into a failed state and thus a source of immigrants to Europe by NATO bombing, have a fertility rate more than three times the European rate. These numbers make it clear, Europe is engaged in self-genocide driven by puppets of the globalist money power, such as Blair and Cameron, Sarkozy and Hollande, and above all, Frau Merkel. The objective is a mongrel Europe of  easily manipulated deracinated serfs among whom will be found the subservient technicians to run the global machinery of commerce, and solve the servant problem, as George H. W. Bush said many years ago with reference to illegal Mexican immigrants to the US.
———
* The Darwinian struggle, as is now understood, is about the propagation of genes, and thus cannot be directly measured by they number of an individual's own descendants. That means the struggle for the survival of the European people's is a matter for everyone, including the childless.

Related:

'I decapitate you' Women workers threatened and forced to DRESS DOWN at refugee centre

Stabbing death of 15yo schoolboy by ‘Arab migrant’ classmate in Sweden

To Fight Racism, Oregon College Devotes an Entire Month to ‘Whiteness’-Shaming

"Pope of Islam": Hijab is a display of Muslim supremacy, not just modesty

McCallum: 90% of Muslim migrants to New Brunswick can't speak English or French -- and "that's a good thing"

US Federal 'Common Core' Education Curriculum has anti-American agenda