Covid: The Great Deception

 By Rob Slane:

The Blogmire, June 18, 2021: Dr. Peter McCullough is one of the most eminent physicians and scientists in the US, and reputed to be the most published cardiologist in history. Along with a number of others, he devised a treatment protocol for Covid-19, which was shown to be effective in preventing up to 85% of deaths. Yet having spent the best part of a year seeing all discussions of these treatments suppressed, resisted and censored by the authorities, media and Big Tech, he has come to a shocking conclusion:

“I believe that we’re under the application of a form of bioterrorism that’s worldwide, that appears to have been many years in the planning. The first wave of the bioterrorism was a respiratory virus that spread across the world and affected relatively few people, but generated great fear. … The entire programme as this bioterrorism Phase 1 was rolled out, was really all about keeping the population in fear and in isolation and preparing them to accept the vaccine, which appears to be Phase 2 of a bioterrorism operation.”

At the end of his interview with the German lawyer, Reiner Fuellmich, he poses the following question:

“To me what was masterful is the psychological part of it. How did they pull this off from a mass psychology perspective?”

Of course, the response from those who have spent 15 months letting the Government and media do their thinking will be to dismiss his claims as that of a Conspiracy Theorist. Well, you dismiss someone of Dr. McCullough’s stature as a Conspiracy Theorist at your peril, especially as he happens to be someone who devoted his time to developing effective treatments for Covid-19, only to see them ruthlessly suppressed. But those dismissing his words should consider this: by definition, a Conspiracy Theory is a theory about something that someone believes is going to happen or which has happened. But Dr. McCullough is not talking about that. He is talking about something that is happening in real time, in plain sight, right in front of your eyes – if you have your eyes open to see it.

Almost everything we have been told about this virus and the response to it has been a lie. Not a mistake, not an accident, not a misunderstanding. Dr Mike Yeadon, one of the few true heroes of the moment, lists these falsehoods as follows:

1. That the virus is novel, so there is no immunity to it.
2. That the virus is very much more lethal than anything else we’ve encountered.
3. That there are no treatments.
4. That the PCR is a reliable test of clinically important infection.
5. That the virus can be spread by infected people without symptoms.
6. That masks protect against transmission.
7. That Lockdowns slow transmission through the community.
8. That variants formed during virus replication are more dangerous and some will escape immunity.
9. That it’s uncertain if you can be infected twice.
10. That the vaccines are safe and effective.

Each of these points is, he says, provably untrue. Yet despite this, even if most people were offered irrefutable evidence that they are untrue, they still cannot bring themselves to come to any other conclusion than to question the official narrative is a “Conspiracy Theory”

Read more

Related:

Evidence of Antibody Dependent Enhancement? – Majority of Covid deaths are the fully vaccinated and A&E attendance is breaking records

Why Democracy Died

To know why democracy died, it is necessary to understand why it came into existence.

Democracy is an improbable form of government. Throughout the thousands of years of human existence, before the emergence of cities, states and empires, humans lived in tribes of hunter gatherers, small groups of no fixed address, each tribe dominated by an alpha male or chief who impregnated most of the women and killed anyone who got in his way.

The agricultural revolution meant both an increase in population and the creation of settled communities with permanent housing, irrigation works, markets, temples, defensive walls and fortresses. With the rise of such communities, or city states, one man (or occasionally woman) rule remained the rule but with some elaboration. 

One man could not rule a city without a hierarchy of soldiers, administrators, and priests, the heads of each institutional group naturally acquired a degree of personal power independent of the Chief, or Prince, or King. But still the system remain firmly top-down, with trouble from uppity plebs subject to brutal suppression.

Rulers of large cities naturally sought to subordinate smaller cities, so that city states generally gave way to empires. But top-down government headed by a single person, the Prince, the King, the Emperor, remained the rule, though now with subordinate individuals, as for example, military commanders, tax collectors, architects, and priests wielding ever great powers.

But whatever the exact form of government of the newly risen city states and empires, no ruler had the insane idea of asking the people, the peasants, the surfs, the helots, the slave class, to take the reigns of power and dictate to the rulers what should be done.

Not, that is, until the emergence of the peculiar Greek city state of Athens during the late bronze age.

Why did this bizarre transformation in the government of Athens happen? Several unusual factors contributed.

Important was the geography of Greece which comprises many islands, and a mainland deeply indented by sea inlets and divided by mountain ranges, thus providing many small habitable areas of cultivable land sufficient to support a city state while providing natural defenses against attack by neighboring communities. As a result, the city states of ancient Greece survived long after Egypt, Persia, North Africa, Italy and China had been subordinated to imperial regimes.

Not that the inhospitable terrain discouraged imperialist ambitions among the leaders of the Greek city states who engaged repeatedly in mostly futile campaigns to subjugate one another.

A consequence of such wars was the acquisition of slaves, either soldiers taken captive in battle or the inhabitants of territory temporarily occupied during interstate conflicts. As a result, the landowning citizens of Athens were not obliged to till their own lands. Being free to pursue other interests, some naturally engaged in politics. And as the Athenian state was small, the most effective means to pursue a political career was by speaking in the town square.

This inevitably gave power to those who could rouse the mob. The game was formalized with those attending in the public forum registering their support for or against this or that proposal by marking a ballot in the form or a clay tile, or ostrakon, and dropping it into an urn to be counted. 

Athenian ballot form

Slaves and women were excluded from participation, but the male owners of slaves and women, referred to themselves as the people, or demos, hence democracy. Rule, that is, under the leadership of men of ambition and rapacity, who, intent only on elevating their own status, wealth and power even at the expense of the people, had the ability to sway the crowd. 

This crazy system, under which the greatest rabble-rousers drove Athens into endless wars against other Greek communities, might have continued to this day had not the Romans imposed imperial rule upon Greece from without. Thereafter, democracy became extinct throughout the world, until the modern era.

And it was modernity, and in particular industrialism and the consequent phenomenon of total war, that made the emergence of mass democracy inevitable.

Industrialization required the assembly and organization of large numbers of well disciplined workers in mines and factories, at docks and construction sites. Trouble was, the large assemblies of workers operating capital intensive systems of production and distribution were alarmingly prone to revolt against brutal conditions and long hours of work for miserable pay at a time when the newly enriched entrepreneurial class engaged in the most extravagant displays of wealth and privilege.

What to do?

Arthur Wellesley, Duke of Wellington, Commander in Chief of British armed forces, victor over Napoleon at the Battle of Waterloo, and UK Prime Minister during the 1820's, urged the rapid development of railways to facilitate the movement of troops to deal with workers' rebellions. 

But instead of reliance on the systematic application of force, Britain's middle and upper class reformers reduced the risk of revolution by alleviating the horrible conditions of life for the mass of Britain's working people. This they did through successful campaigns to eliminate child labor, reduce working hours, improve work place safety, create a system of universal education, introduce old-age pensions (the necessary legislation set before Parliament by that prime target of today's British Woke university hatred, Winston Churchill), and  extend the franchise, universal suffrage for men being achieved in 1918.

That mass democracy arrived in Britain in the final year of Europe's great civil war was no coincidence. With millions of working men returning from a grotesque world of filth, lice, and mass slaughter in a struggle with German working men with whom they had more in common than with their own ruling class, some adjustment in the political system was essential to the maintenance of political stability.

That the war had already detonated Russia's Bolshevik Revolution to be followed by the deposition and murder of the of the Tsar, his wife and children, and that it threatened Germany with the same transformation, further concentrated the minds of the British elite on the need for greater deference to the interests of the lower classes. 

The refusal of Liverpool's dock workers to load armaments for shipment in aid of the anti-Bolshevik forces in Russia, provided further stimulus to ruling class deference to the opinions of the proletariat. 

Thus was democracy in modern form instituted in the nation that, more than any other, created the modern world. It was a response not to wokeness, but weakness. 

But the Western world is now post modern. 

A pair of hands is no longer worth a living wage. 

Automation and AI have largely eliminated the need for either a working class of unskilled or semi-skilled workers, or a lower middle class of clerks and secretaries. 

Furthermore, modern weapons have entirely eliminated the value of mass armies. Future wars will be won, not by laying down the lives of millions of citizen soldiers whose loyalty the ruling class has earned, but with advanced technology weapons operated by a small cadre of military technologists.

How then, for the elite, which is to say the owners of modern technology, to dispense with the encumbrance of democracy.

Cancellation would be one solution. But it would be messy. It would provoke demonstrations, probably violent. With blood spilled, resentments would burn indefinitely.

But technology provides a superior alternative: mind control through media manipulation; indoctrination in the guise of education; garbage entertainment as distraction; plus fake news; fake elections; fake presidents; and a fake pandemic to force compliance with an increasingly authoritarian state.

Hence, endless bullshit TV news; the woke university; pornography as acceptable entertainment; President Biden; Meghan Remarkables; plus Covid19, facemasks, lockdowns and social distancing.

Image source

Democracy was interesting while it lasted. Now get used to the increasingly arrogant Gates-style techsploitation, to population reduction, and a pivot to a world order of which the main features were anticipated by Aldous Huxley (Brave New World) and George Orwell (1984).

Related:

Caitlin Johnstone: The Fucking President Has Fucking Dementia: Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix

C.J. Hopkins: Manufacturing (New Normal) “Reality”

Leader of the Peoples' Party of Canada, Maxime Bernier, Speaks with Tucker Carlson About His Arrest for Speaking Against Lockdowns in Manitoba

Michael Yeadon: UK Government and Science Advisers Guilty of Covid Mass Murder. And: Moderna Covid Vaccine Patent Application Explicitly Anticipated Deliberate Release of SARS-COV2

Dr. Michael Yeadon, June 14, 2021: UK Government advisors and Ministers are guilty of mass murder in mishandling of Covid epidemic:



Moderna Patent filed on March 28, 2019, because quote:

...of a concern for a re-emergence for a deliberate release of SARS Corona virus vaccine development was inititated ....

Related: 

Luc Montagnier, Nobel Laureate: The Covid Vaccine is 'Creating Variants'

Negligible impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants on CD4+ and CD8+ T cell reactivity in COVID-19 exposed donors and vaccinees

The Western World Viewed From the East

By Vladimir Putin

We can see how many of the Euro-Atlantic countries are actually rejecting their roots, including the Christian values that constitute the basis of Western civilisation. They are denying moral principles and all traditional identities: national, cultural, religious and even sexual. They are implementing policies that equate large families with same-sex partnerships, belief in God with the belief in Satan.

The excesses of political correctness have reached the point where people are seriously talking about registering political parties whose aim is to promote paedophilia. People in many European countries are embarrassed or afraid to talk about their religious affiliations. Holidays are abolished or even called something different; their essence is hidden away, as is their moral foundation. And people are aggressively trying to export this model all over the world. I am convinced that this opens a direct path to degradation and primitivism, resulting in a profound demographic and moral crisis.

What else but the loss of the ability to self-reproduce could act as the greatest testimony of the moral crisis facing a human society? Today almost all developed nations are no longer able to reproduce themselves, even with the help of migration. Without the values embedded in Christianity and other world religions, without the standards of morality that have taken shape over millennia, people will inevitably lose their human dignity. We consider it natural and right to defend these values. One must respect every minority’s right to be different, but the rights of the majority must not be put into question.

At the same time we see attempts to somehow revive a standardised model of a unipolar world and to blur the institutions of international law and national sovereignty. Such a unipolar, standardised world does not require sovereign states; it requires vassals. In a historical sense this amounts to a rejection of one’s own identity, of the God-given diversity of the world.

Source: 

Related: 

ZH: Petition Demands Resignation Of New Jersey School Board After Holiday Names Replaced With Generic "Day Off"

The West as seen by China:

The Last G7: A cartoon parody of Leonardo da Vinci's Last Supper featured in an article by the Communist Party mouthpiece, The Global Times, depicts the US, UK, Italy, Canada, Japan, Germany, France, India and Australia as various animals. Source

Moronic Biden Cabinet Member Abolishes Motherhood

How to Depopulate the World: Self-disseminating Sterilizing Vaccines

"Self-disseminating vaccines have their roots in the Australian effort to create sterilizing vaccines for small mammal control." Source: Nature Ecology and Evolution — 27 July 2020: Self-disseminating vaccines to suppress zoonoses (Scott L. Nuismer & James J. Bull)

   There you have it: Bill Gates'es answer to the problem of useless plebs in a world of automation and AI:

   Dr. Fauci will finance the research, then a "lab leak," universally denied by the trusty media, and the self-disseminating "vaccine" will do the rest.

   First, though, the elite require an anti-sterilizing virus vaccine for themselves.

   As the authors of this paper write:

"Their (i.e., self-disseminating vaccines) obvious advantage, of course, is that for each animal you vaccinate directly, additional animals are vaccinated for ‘free’ either through behavioural transmission of a conventional vaccine or through the contagious spread of a transmissible vaccine. ...."

   And:

"There are two possible applications for self-disseminating vaccines, ... one that can be realized now and another that is more aspirational.

The immediate application focuses on well-characterized pathogens such as rabies and Lassa virus that regularly spillover into the human population from known animal reservoirs.

The aspirational application envisions the possibility of preventing future pandemics by eliminating high-risk zoonotic pathogens from their animal reservoirs before spillover into the human population occurs."

   But that there are only "two possible applications" for the technology of self-disseminating vaccines is clearly false, as the authors' boxed statement above confirms. 

   The technology of self-disseminating "vaccines" provides top-down control of future human evolution. 

   Yes, the technology of self-disseminating "vaccines" provides elites, people like Bill Gates and his friends such as the supposedly late Jeffrey Epstein, the means to eliminate large swaths of the global population, while introducing whatever characteristics they deem desirable in that remnant of the global population they see fit to preserve. 

   What will stop them. Nothing that I can think of, other than world revolution followed by a Taliban-style suppression of advanced technology. 

   In the meantime, here's what would bring me to approve the Presidency of Joe Biden: a one-time 15%  "emergency" capital tax on billionaires, to be followed by an annual capital tax of 2%. That would at least put the bastards on notice. 

Related: 

US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting system:

‘Self-spreading’ vaccines pose multiple risks to society — including the end of informed consent

Lawmakers Send Letter To Fauci Demanding He Explain Remarks That Allegedly Contradict Testimony To Congress

America's Moral Decline: Fauci Lied to Congress, and a US Judge Condoned Torture

Despite Fauci’s claims, the National Institute for Allergic and Infectious Diseases, which Fauci heads, provided money that went to China's Wuhan Institute of Virology for gain of function research. Specifically, research that weaponized corona viruses originating from bats.

And at Gitmo: For the first time in American history, a federal judge last week authorized the government to admit as evidence in a criminal case in a public courtroom words uttered by the defendant that were obtained under torture. The fruits of torture – which is any cruel or degrading or intentionally painful or disorienting behavior visited upon a person in captivity to induce compliance or to gratify the torturer – are not permitted in any court in the United States, and their inducement is criminal. Read more.

Suuuuure, Covid19 Did Not Come From the Lab

Hear Fauci-funded Peter Daszak, who subcontracted research to China's Wuhan Institute of Virology, on how we create deadly new diseases in the lab:

  

And supporting the out-of-the-lab thesis on the origin of Covid19, if only unintentionally, this absurdly bad article and mostly fatuous comments from the Unz Review, which claims that the virus was created and released by a bunch of dirty NeoCon Jews plus the horrible Steve Bannon intent on war with China.

Yes, there may be dirty NeoCon Jews intent on war with China, but that is not the relevant question. What's relevant is:

(1) Are there people creating dangerous pathogenic viruses in the lab?

And if so,

(2) Are they creating dangerous pathogenic corona viruses with spike protein genetically engineered to increase infectivity and virulence, i.e., viruses that would look just like Covid19.

To which the answer, in both cases, is yes.

Related questions of interests include:

(3) Was such gain-of-function research on pathogenic viruses being conducted in China?

And if so,

(4) Was such work conducted in collaboration with scientists from the US, the UK and other Western countries with US Funding provided, directly or indirectly, by Fauci's National Institute of Allergic and Infectious Diseases?

To which the answer in both cases is yes.

None of this means that Covid19 came from the lab, but it establishes:

First, that Covid19 could be, and in light of other evidence, almost certain is, a lab construct;

Second, that Covid19 could have been released from the lab into the human population in many possible accidental or deliberate ways, including collusion between US and Chinese agents intent on promoting the New World Ordure.

Related:

ZH: CDC To Hold "Emergency Meeting" After 100s Suffer Heart Inflammation Following COVID Vaccines
CanSpeccy: Blaming America for China's Covid lab leak?

CanSpeccy: SARS COV 2 Pandemic: A Joint US:China Biowarfare Defense Exercise?

ZH: Emails Reveal How Influential Articles That Established COVID-19 Natural Origins Theory Were Formed

Off Guardian: WHO’s Chief Scientist Served with Legal Notice for Disinformation and Suppression of Evidence

UR: The Killer in the Bloodstream: the "Spike Protein"

Go Tatiana: Irate New York Mother Demolishes Commie School Board

Wall St. Journal: The Science Suggests a Wuhan Lab Leak

By Steven Quay and Richard Muller

Wall St. Journal, June 6, 2021: The possibility that the pandemic began with an escape from the Wuhan Institute of Virology is attracting fresh attention. President Biden has asked the national intelligence community to redouble efforts to investigate.

Much of the public discussion has focused on circumstantial evidence: mysterious illnesses in late 2019; the lab’s work intentionally supercharging viruses to increase lethality (known as “gain of function” research). The Chinese Communist Party has been reluctant to release relevant information. Reports based on U.S. intelligence have suggested the lab collaborated on projects with the Chinese military.

But the most compelling reason to favor the lab leak hypothesis is firmly based in science. In particular, consider the genetic fingerprint of CoV-2, the novel coronavirus responsible for the disease Covid-19. 

In gain-of-function research, a microbiologist can increase the lethality of a coronavirus enormously by splicing a special sequence into its genome at a prime location. Doing this leaves no trace of manipulation. But it alters the virus spike protein, rendering it easier for the virus to inject genetic material into the victim cell. Since 1992 there have been at least 11 separate experiments adding a special sequence to the same location. The end result has always been supercharged viruses.

A genome is a blueprint for the factory of a cell to make proteins. The language is made up of three-letter “words,” 64 in total, that represent the 20 different amino acids. For example, there are six different words for the amino acid arginine, the one that is often used in supercharging viruses. Every cell has a different preference for which word it likes to use most.

In the case of the gain-of-function supercharge, other sequences could have been spliced into this same site. Instead of a CGG-CGG (known as “double CGG”) that tells the protein factory to make two arginine amino acids in a row, you’ll obtain equal lethality by splicing any one of 35 of the other two-word combinations for double arginine. If the insertion takes place naturally, say through recombination, then one of those 35 other sequences is far more likely to appear; CGG is rarely used in the class of coronaviruses that can recombine with CoV-2.

In fact, in the entire class of coronaviruses that includes CoV-2, the CGG-CGG combination has never been found naturally. That means the common method of viruses picking up new skills, called recombination, cannot operate here. A virus simply cannot pick up a sequence from another virus if that sequence isn’t present in any other virus.

Although the double CGG is suppressed naturally, the opposite is true in laboratory work. The insertion sequence of choice is the double CGG. That’s because it is readily available and convenient, and scientists have a great deal of experience inserting it. An additional advantage of the double CGG sequence compared with the other 35 possible choices: It creates a useful beacon that permits the scientists to track the insertion in the laboratory.

Now the damning fact. It was this exact sequence that appears in CoV-2. Proponents of zoonotic origin must explain why the novel coronavirus, when it mutated or recombined, happened to pick its least favorite combination, the double CGG. Why did it replicate the choice the lab’s gain-of-function researchers would have made?

Yes, it could have happened randomly, through mutations. But do you believe that? At the minimum, this fact—that the coronavirus, with all its random possibilities, took the rare and unnatural combination used by human researchers—implies that the leading theory for the origin of the coronavirus must be laboratory escape.

When the lab’s Shi Zhengli and colleagues published a paper in February 2020 with the virus’s partial genome, they omitted any mention of the special sequence that supercharges the virus or the rare double CGG section. Yet the fingerprint is easily identified in the data that accompanied the paper. Was it omitted in the hope that nobody would notice this evidence of the gain-of-function origin?

But in a matter of weeks virologists Bruno Coutard and colleagues published their discovery of the sequence in CoV-2 and its novel supercharged site. Double CGG is there; you only have to look. They comment in their paper that the protein that held it “may provide a gain-of-function” capability to the virus, “for efficient spreading” to humans.

There is additional scientific evidence that points to CoV-2’s gain-of-function origin. The most compelling is the dramatic differences in the genetic diversity of CoV-2, compared with the coronaviruses responsible for SARS and MERS.

Both of those were confirmed to have a natural origin; the viruses evolved rapidly as they spread through the human population, until the most contagious forms dominated. Covid-19 didn’t work that way. It appeared in humans already adapted into an extremely contagious version. No serious viral “improvement” took place until a minor variation occurred many months later in England.

Such early optimization is unprecedented, and it suggests a long period of adaptation that predated its public spread. Science knows of only one way that could be achieved: simulated natural evolution, growing the virus on human cells until the optimum is achieved. That is precisely what is done in gain-of-function research. Mice that are genetically modified to have the same coronavirus receptor as humans, called “humanized mice,” are repeatedly exposed to the virus to encourage adaptation.


The presence of the double CGG sequence is strong evidence of gene splicing, and the absence of diversity in the public outbreak suggests gain-of-function acceleration. The scientific evidence points to the conclusion that the virus was developed in a laboratory.

Dr. Quay is founder of Atossa Therapeutics and author of “Stay Safe: A Physician’s Guide to Survive Coronavirus.” Mr. Muller is an emeritus professor of physics at the University of California Berkeley and a former senior scientist at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Source

Related: 

Global Research: CPSO to Ontario Doctors: “Shut Up or Lose Your Licence”

Global Research: Wuhan Lab Upheld as Source of COVID-19: China as a Target. Corrupt Political Circus on Behalf of Super-Rich
Unherd: Beijing’s useful idiots: Science journals have encouraged a false Covid narrative
Off Gurudian: The Wuhan “lab-leak” story: more fear porn

ZH: How the Clever Commies Beat the Corona Virus -- NOT

America's Repellent Elite: The Truth About Bill Gates, Microsoft, and Jeffrey Epstein

 By Whitney Webb

In early May, the announcement that Bill and Melinda Gates would be divorcing after twenty-seven years of marriage shocked both those that praise and those that loathe the “philanthropic” power couple.

Less than a week after the initial announcement of the divorce, on May 7, the Daily Beast reported that Melinda Gates had allegedly been “deeply troubled” by Bill Gates’s relationship with child sex trafficker and intelligence asset Jeffrey Epstein. The report suggested that Melinda was a major reason for her husband’s decision to distance himself from Epstein around 2014 because of her discomfort with Epstein after they both met him in 2013. That previously unreported meeting had taken place at Epstein’s mansion on New York’s Upper East Side.

The Daily Beast also revealed that the details of the Gates’s divorce had been decided several weeks prior to the official announcement. Then, on May 9, the Wall Street Journal published a report suggesting that the plans for divorce went back even farther, with Melinda having consulted divorce lawyers in 2019. Allegedly, that consultation was made after details of Bill Gates’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein had gained considerable mainstream media attention, including from the New York Times.

While mainstream media outlets apparently agree that Jeffrey Epstein was a likely factor in the Gates’s recently announced split up, what these same outlets refuse to cover is the real extent of the Bill Gates–Jeffrey Epstein relationship. Indeed, the mainstream narrative holds that Gates’s ties to Epstein began in 2011, despite the evidence pointing to their relationship beginning decades earlier.

This blanket refusal to honestly report on the Gates-Epstein ties likely is due to Gates’s outsized role in current events, both in terms of global health policy as it relates to COVID-19 and in his being a major promoter and funder of controversial technocratic “solutions” to a slew of societal problems. What is more likely, however, is that the nature of the relationship between Gates and Epstein before 2011 is even more scandalous than what transpired later, and it may have major implications not just for Gates but for Microsoft as a company and for some of its former top executives.

This particular cover-up is part of an obvious tendency of mainstream media to ignore the clear influence that both Epstein and members of the Maxwell family wielded—and, arguably, continue to wield—in Silicon Valley. Indeed, the individuals who founded tech giants such as Google, LinkedIn, Facebook, Microsoft, Tesla, and Amazon all have connections with Jeffrey Epstein, some closer than others.

Read More

The Origin of Covid: An Interesting Observation

Here's a comment from a discussion over at Unz.com:

Antibeast: Phylogenetic analyses have shown that the Wuhan ‘L’ strain is NOT ancestral to the Italian ‘G’ strain which has the D614G mutation in its spike S protein, causing the latter to become more infectious over time. The Wuhan ‘L’ strain does NOT have the D614G mutation in its spike S protein which explains its low rate of infectiousness thus leading to a lower number of Covid-19 cases in Wuhan, as compared to Italy. The attribution of Wuhan-1 arising inside of China is quite likely true, however the attribution of progenitor Covid is not needed to originate inside of China, that is only an inference that has not been established. The Wuhan ‘L’ strain is attributed to have originated in Wuhan while the Italian ‘G’ strain is attributed to have originated in Italy. Both share a common ancestral strain which has yet to be attributed to its place of origin. Here’s an article discussing the significance of the D614G mutation in the Italian ‘G’ strain which caused the global Covid-19 pandemic: https://graphics.reuters.com/HEALTH-CORONAVIRUS/EVOLUTION/yxmpjqkdzvr/ G strains are now dominant around the world. One specific mutation, D614G, has become the most common variant. It is so named because one amino acid is changed from a D (aspartate) to a G (glycine) at the 614th position on the viral spike proteins, the structure that gives the virus its crown-like appearance. The rise of the G strains coincided with spikes in outbreaks of the virus around the world, with a clutch of new cases allowing the strains to invade new areas. The dominance of the G strains is illustrated by the data for Australia, Japan and Thailand. During Australia’s second wave of infections, G strains were present in almost all samples, indicating the country had effectively eliminated transmission of the earlier L and S strains through a series of social distancing measures. All of Australia’s second wave clusters were sparked by people who had returned from overseas and breaches in quarantine. The dominance of the G-strains becomes even more evident when looking at some countries with the most infections. The United States is leading the overall number of infections and deaths by far. The majority of infections and first, second, and third waves all coincide with the increase in samples showing three G strains. In India, a similar pattern can be observed as the constant increase in infections from June to September seemed to follow the curve of the G strain samples. Empirical evidence suggests that travel bans and containment measures adopted against travelers from China during Jan-Feb 2020 helped stop the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus as evidenced by the low number of Covid-19 cases involving the Wuhan ‘L’ strain outside of China. Scientific evidence has now proven that the Italian ‘G’ strain spread rapidly throughout the Western World during the same period precisely due to its D614G mutation which caused the global Covid-19 pandemic. As both the Wuhan ‘L’ strain and the Italian ‘G’ strain were known to have been discovered in December 2019, the question as to the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus must perforce address the global spread of the ancestral strain prior to December 2019. This inquiry should not be limited to Wuhan but also expanded to Italy and elsewhere.

That the SARS-COV2 viral outbreak in China in late 2019 was of the less infectious L Strain, not the G Strain that afflicted the rest of the world, would explain several otherwise curious facts; namely, 

(1) that China contained the initial outbreak quickly and with very few deaths; and 

(2) that China is currently resorting to lockdowns to limit new outbreaks of SARS-COV2 that are, presumably of the more infectious and virulent G Strain that originated outside of China.

As the author of the comment quoted above notes, that the global pandemic began with more than one viral strain raises new questions about the origin and global spread of SARS-COV2.

Time for Fauci and Gates to Sweat

 By Yusef:

Fauci has been nothing more, his entire career, than a tool to the elites who run the country from behind the scenes.

It may be-- maybe-- now the octogenarian tool will be used as the scapegoat for the whole ugly destructive mess.

"We were listening to Dr. Fauci, the nation's 'chief immunologist'-- what else could we do? We had no idea, no idea at all, he was this corrupt. We didn't know he was the bad apple at NIH, spoiling the bunch of great scientific work they otherwise do there."

Dr. Fauci has been touted as if all-knowing, the scientist who knows more than any other scientist, and even knows, just by looking at it, what's credible and what is not.

I mean, come on, look at this. Facebook and Google were censoring anyone who mentioned the lab leak theory. Even though the lab leak theory was the one best supported by what we knew.

A virus with bat and pangolin and then a special furin-activating site which just happened to activate infectivity into humans. Suspected to have originated in a place in China known to have a lab conducting precisely such "gain of function" research, and where lab workers had been hospitalized with "covid-like" symptoms prior to the general outbreak.

But the nation's chief immunologist said that was ridiculous, so it was ridiculous. Until now, when it may turn out to be convenient for the powers that be the nation's chief immunologist be revealed as a conniving buffoon.

If I was Fauci, I would be sweating. But it does look as if he's been sweating all along...

If I was Bill Gates, I would be sweating. Fauci and Gates are connected somehow and this is understood among those paying attention. But Gates probably isn't sweating. Nor has he been sweating all along. He is far too stupid and removed from the realities of daily plebian life to see how vulnerable he actually is right now.

Related:

AIER: Why Is There Such Reluctance to Discuss Natural Immunity?

Now flip-flopping Fauci wants answers from China

Globe and Mail: Canada's connection with China's bioweapons research

Head of Canada's Level 4 Biohazard Virology Lab: Sudden Death

Read the Fauci emails

Fauci’s Boss ADMITS That NIH Was Funding Wuhan Lab And The CCP, Not Them, Had Control Over What They Were Doing

DM: British doctor and his secret campaign to gag the Covid lab leak theory: He worked in Wuhan and manipulated coronaviruses — yet orchestrated a campaign to clear it of blame and tried to hide his tracks

Jonathan Cook: Was There a Wuhan Lab Leak? An Inquiry Won't Dig Out the Truth. It Will Deepen the Deception

Armstrong Economics: Gates & Schwab Control Europe

Big Pharma now taking out Big Tech: Oracle VP dies of “covid” after receiving second vaccine injection

'Too risky to pursue': Wuhan lab 'bat woman' and US expert warned against performing gain of function experiments

Zhengli-Li Shi (Bat Woman) and Ralph S. Baric and others: A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence

Chinese military 'engineered mice with humanized lungs' in 2019 to test viruses on them - just months before the pandemic erupted

Former CIA Director and Vice President George H. W. Bush endorsing Dr. Fauci

GWP: Chinese Defector Confirms COVID-19 Was Manmade in a Laboratory – This Is Why the Obama-Biden Gang Has Changed Its Narrative Surrounding the Origins of COVID-19

LOL: Scientist At Center Of Lab Leak Controversy Put In Charge Of The Lancet’s Task Force To Investigate Virus Origin

AIER: Liberating Yourself from Faucism

ZH: China Covid Lockdown

Danish Authorities Shut Down Access to Bitchute Over “Dangerous” COVID-19 Information

Tucker Carlson: Fauci should be under criminal investigation:

Blaming America for China's Covid lab leak?

Did the virus responsible for the Covid-19 pandemic come from China's Virology Research Institute in Wuhan? 

And if so, did it get loose by accident or design. 

Today the English speaking media seem to have abandoned the idea that the virus came by chance from a bat to humans, possibly by way of an intermediate vector such as a pangolin. 

 

Instead, the story now is that the virus most likely escaped from China's Wuhan institute of virology, when workers there became infected and took the virus home with them, thereby setting the virus on course to infect, first, the people of Wuhan, and then the World.

The Unz Review (Prop. Ron Unz)  however, is fiercely combating that meme, arguing in a series of articles by Ron himself that the pandemic is a 100% American-made fiasco and that to suggest any Chinese responsibility is a gross libel on that unfortunate nation, emanating from a US Government described by one Unz.com commenter as "a collection of liars, murderers and thieves acting in bad faith," which I suppose is a fair description -- a fair description, in fact, of just about any government, including, quite possibly, China's. 

In his latest piece, Mr. Unz offers fifty two hundred words to distract from the fact that Wuhan virologists, with indirect US funding via Dr. Fauci's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, were evaluating chimeric corona viruses for human infectivity, as tested on human tissue cultures and humanized mice. Details are reported here:

WHO inspector caught on camera revealing coronavirus manipulation in Wuhan before pandemic

The pandemic has thus, almost certainly, been the result of US:Chinese collaboration. And that collaboration either led to an unintended lab leak, or to an exercise to evaluate pandemic control measures in anticipation of someone accidentally or deliberately letting loose a corona virus with a lethality of 50% plus, not Covid's 0.05%. 

cf: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdYDL_RK--w

Related:

Vanity Fair: The Lab-Leak Theory: Inside the Fight to Uncover COVID-19’s Origins

...A trove of emails from Dr. Anthony Fauci — who was the government’s top infectious disease specialist during the AIDS pandemic, the anthrax attacks, and the COVID pandemic — was published on Monday by BuzzFeed after they were produced pursuant to a FOIA request. Among other things, they reveal that in February and March of last year — at the time that Fauci and others were dismissing any real possibility that the coronavirus inadvertently escaped from a lab, to the point that the Silicon Valley monopolies Facebook and Google banned any discussion of that theory -- Fauci and his associates and colleagues were privately discussing the possibility that the virus had escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, possibly as part of a U.S.-funded joint program with the scientists at that lab. ...

'It looks a lot like perjury': Tucker Carlson accuses Dr Fauci of lying

FAUCI LIED, MILLIONS DIED — Fauci Was Informed of Hydroxychloroquine Success in Early 2020 But Lied to Public Instead Despite the Science #FauciEmails

"Expect the Unexpected" Indeed - Fauci's Pandemic-Profiteering Book Was Just Pulled From Amazon, Barnes & Noble

"That Was A Lie": Tucker Carlson Levels Fauci After FOIA Emails Connect The Dots

Wuhan Panic: Is Fauci Going To Jail?

GWP: Dr. McCullough Sounds the Alarm on Covid Jabs: All Covid-19 Vaccines Produce the Dangerous Wuhan Spike Protein (AUDIO)

ZH: Email Shows Researcher Who Funded Wuhan Lab, Admits Manipulating Coronaviruses, Thanked Fauci For Dismissing Lab-Leak Theory

ZH: Fauci Emails Reveal Damage Control Scramble After ZeroHedge Spotlights Man-Made COVID-19 Theory

Rumble: WORLD RENOWNED DOCTOR BLOWS LID OFF OF COVID VACCINE

The Many Hands of Jordan Peterson

SARS COV 2 Pandemic: A Joint US:China Biowarfare Defense Exercise?

Is Covid a synthetic virus deployed in a joint US:Chinese exercise to game a pandemic due to a deadly biological weapon of mass destruction?

Accepting that to be so, then the novel corona virus, SARS-CoV2, which is of the type responsible for the common cold, must have been deployed because it is virtually harmless except to elderly people who are liable to be carried off by even a mild  respiratory infection. 

However, this particular strain of corona virus has been souped up through joint US:Chinese "gain-of-function" research to be highly infectious, as would be required of a real WMD.

The PCR test was adopted as the standard means of identifying cases because the symptoms of Covid infection were too  hard to detect, there being no swollen lymph nodes (buboes), pocks, vomiting of blood, etc., to distinguish the infection from, well, a just a common cold.

To induce the state of fear necessary to induce people to participate in the exercise, the virus was released in the vicinity of a Chinese bioweapons research establishment. 

To make the virus especially scary, it was reported to have jumped from bats to humans -- yikes.

Then the Chinese put on a fine bit of theartre, with folks supposedly stricken by the virus dropping in the streets, going into paroxysms, etc.

Other videos showed people in China being nailed up in their homes or being doused in the streets by trucks spraying disinfectant. 

In First World nations, infected hospital patients were forced into care homes for the elderly causing a die-off among the useless eaters. Thus in Canada, over 70% of all reported Covid deaths were "achieved" in this way.

Now almost everyone was scared and there was no trouble getting folks to mask up, while seeking always to maintain their distance from every other human on the face of the earth, even the flesh of their own flesh, their partner in marriage. 

To maintain the fear, the PRC test was amped to give massive numbers of false positive "cases," while anyone dying within 28 days of a positive test was declared a Covid "death" even if the proximal cause of death happened to have been a motor vehicle accident or a bullet to the head. 

Meantime, big pharma worked for a big pay-day by producing a novel type of "vaccine" that does not give you real immunity, just some antibodies to be going on with until a top-up shot, or booster, is required. 

Most people were scared enough by now to get "vaccinated" as soon as possible, and those who were reluctant were being bullied into it by being labelled vaccine hesitant, anti-vaxx or just plain conspiracy nuts. 

Moreover, the "hesitant" were threatened with the introduction of a vaccine passport, for the lack thereof, they would be barred from virtually every social space and function, a fate unavoidable without getting the shot, plus the booster and the top-up and whatever else the authorities decide it is necessary that the people be injected with. 

Meantime the case count as determined by the dodgy PCR test showed the virus to be coming in waves, while genome analysis showed it to be fissioning into multiple variants, each potentially more deadly than the last. 

Thus it was decided that salvation, for which the people were now desperately anxious, could be achieved only by locking all but essential workers at home. 

Lockdowns, at first known only in totalitarian China, were now essential throughout the developed world, although poorer countries, where lockdown was impractical since it would mean general starvation, seemed to suffer no worse from Covid than the developed world.

But even in the developed world, lockdowns were not without catastrophic consequences for millions upon millions of small business, many of which have been driven to permanent closure. 

Meantime, at vast public expense, governments established schemes to track and trace the virus, and great fortunes must have been made by those with good government connections in the face-mask and hand sanitizer, and PCR testing sectors of the economy.

At some point, in the next 12 months, the exercise will hopefully be wound up and the world will return to something like normal, but better prepared,perhaps, for all out war with biological weapons of mass destruction.

Related: 

LA Times: Trump administration ended pandemic early-warning program to detect coronaviruses

Daily Mail: COVID-19 'has NO credible natural ancestor'

Martin Armstrong: Collapse in Confidence: Vaccine Refusal

Luc Montagnier (The Nobel Prize winner who isolated the AIDS virus): The COVID-19 Shots are Creating “Variants”

The Daily reckoning: COVID and the Noble Lie

Zero Hedge: Life Insurance & COVID-19; Something Doesn't Make Sense

Gateway Pundit: 1,000 Lawyers and 10,000 Doctors Join Together and File Lawsuit to Prosecute the “2nd Nuremburg Tribunal” Against Corona Fraud Scandal

Dr. Mike Yeadon, Anti-Covid-Vaxx Speech at Canterbury Freedom Rally: 15 May, 2021

In this presentation Dr. Yeadon makes no claim that the vaccines are designed to kill people. Furthermore, he says he'd "like to know what's in them," which suggests that he had no real basis for having previously claimed that the vaccines, or the top-up or booster shots, were designed to depopulate the world. 

Dr. Michael Yeadon, Former Pfizer Inc. VP and Chief Science Officer, Undermines Own Anti-Vaxx Message With Claim That Vaccines Are Designed to Kill Ya

 Yesterday I summarized key points made by Dr. Michael Yeadon, former Pfizer Inc. VP and Chief Science Officer, concerning Covid vaccines and and the public policy response to the Covid pandemic. Here, I consider the validity of four of those claims.

First: asymptomatic transmission is a lie.

This is the premise of Yeadon's claim that locking down asymptomatic people, as a means to stop viral spread, makes no sense. 

On the face of it, the claim is plausible: Only when the virus has multiplied sufficiently to induce coughing, sneezing, and a running nose is the virus easily spread, whether by physical contact or the spread of airborne droplets of mucus and saliva. 

Thus, says Yeadon, we should quarantine the sick not the healthy, "that is what we have always done."

 But what we have always done does not stop viral spread as the almost yearly return of the flu confirms, despite the fact that people expressing symptoms of the flu stay home. 

And the reason that people with the flu staying home does not stop the spread is for the obvious reason that until they become symptomatic, people infected by the flu virus do not stay home, which means that there is "asymptomatic transmission."

In particular, "asymptomatic transmission" most likely occurs during the few hours between a person becoming aware that they are sick and the time they are able to sequester themselves at home.

Thus, it is not necessarily a mistake to quarantine all but essential workers during an epidemic of what is considered a dangerous disease. 

Moreover, even if it is true, as Yeadon claims,  that "we have never done that," i.e., quarantine the healthy, that fact has no bearing on the question of the best public policy today. Furthermore, there is a clear distinction between the present circumstances, and hence the most appropriate policies,  and times of epidemics past. 

For example, in London, during the plague years of the early 17th Century, infected individuals were required to remain at home. Any seen in public with the marks of the plague upon them were liable to death by hanging. 

But that asymptomatic individuals were free to go about their business in plague-ridden London during the early sixteen hundreds was a matter of absolute necessity for the reason that a large proportion of the population was essential to maintain the production and distribution of food and other essential services.

Today, economic conditions are totally different. In the developed world, a mere one percent of the population is sufficient to maintain full agricultural production, and another several percent suffice to move and process the food, keep the lights on, chlorinate the water, and run the sewage plant. For the rest, they might just as well be locked up if that is what it takes to "bend the curve."

Second: Immunity to infection depends, primarily, not on antibodies, but on T-cells.

Is that claim true? As a non expert, I won't presume to say. However, it seems to be the case that robust and durable immunity to a viral pathogen does depend on T-Cell immunity, whereas, antibody immunity, for example that induced by "vaccination" with Covid spike protein mRNA, even if effective in preventing the manifestation of disease in infected individuals, will likely fade within months.

Third: Covid is less of a threat that the flu, except to the elderly and those with certain predisposing conditions

This I believe is correct and it underlies Yeadon's message, which is this: 

We should have allowed Covid to spread freely, while seeking to quarantine only the elderly and others at particular risk of death from Covid. Had that been the policy adopted, herd immunity would have been achieved before the end of last year, and Covid, otherwise known as SARS COV 2 would be a thing of the past, as is the case with SARS COV 1 with which it has an 80% genetic similarity. 

Fourth: Booster shots now being prepared by Yeadon's old employer Pfizer Inc. and other mRNA vaccine suppliers will be designed not only to handle Covid variants that escape control by the current Covid vaccines, but to induce genetic diseases, cancer, liver failure whatever, as a population reduction measure. 

This has to be nonsense. Genetic vaccines, whether of RNA or DNA cannot have secret ingredients. There must be literally thousands of people around the world capable of reading the nucleotide sequence of a nucleic acid "vaccine" and understanding its intended purpose. The inclusion, for example, of CRISPR technology to modify the genetic code of the treated person would be immediately apparent, likewise the inclusion of cancer-causing genes or other lethal components. What that means is that the monstrous crime against humanity that Yeadon proclaims to be the purpose of the ongoing Covid vaccination program would be impossible to perpetrate without exposure.

But if Yeadon's key point is nonsense, what does that mean? Possible it means simply that Dr. Yeadon is off his head. That does happen to highly intelligent people, and there is no doubt that Yeadon is highly intelligent. 

Alternatively, the explanation seems to be that Yeadon is a mouthpiece for extremely nasty propaganda, which works as follows:

Yeadon's key point, that the vaccines are a depopulation weapon designed to kill you, is obvious nonsense, therefore, everything Yeadon says is nonsense, which thus falsifies the idea that: 

(a) Instead of wrecking economies with lockdowns, Governments should have allowed the virus uncontrolled spread to achieve herd immunity, which would have ended the SARS COV 2 pandemic, months ago.  

(b)  That antibody-inducing M-RNA "vaccines" are essentially useless if not worse than useless. 

So it would appear that whatever his intention, Yeadon's public statements about Covid vaccines have the perverse effect of convincing many people that Covid-related public policies pursued by Western governments, including the planned introduction of vaccine passports which Yeadon has quite correctly, in my view, inveighed against,  have all been for the best in the best of all possible worlds, whereas in fact, the opposite is almost certainly case. 

Related:

Summit News: Johns Hopkins Prof: Half Of Americans Have Natural Immunity; Dismissing It Is ‘Biggest failure Of Medical Leadership’

Covid Update May 25, 2021

Mike Yeadon Interview: How you know your government is lying about Covid-19 To summarize what Dr. Yeadon has to say in this lengthy video: 1. Asymptomatic transmission is a lie 2. PCR Tests as they are being conducted are meaningless 3. Lockdown is ineffective as a means to prevent transmission: the correct action is to quarantine the sick not the healthy 4. Covid is less of a threat that the flu, except to the elderly and those with certain predisposing conditions 5. Immunity to infection depends not on antibodies, but on T-cells* 6. Cheap non-proprietary drugs are highly effective in reducing covid infection and treating those already infected. * Here's the controversial bit: that immunity to Covid infection does not depend on antibodies. Is that true. As a non expert, I don't know. But the whole objective of the mRNA vaccines is to induce antibodies. And in particular, it is claimed that the antibodies produced are "neutralizing", which means that they resist infection. It is on this point that Yeadon is in total disagreement with vaccine specialist Geert vanden Bossche, who argues that immunity achieved with the mRNA vaccines will be lost as genetic variants of the virus emerge that escape control by the antibodies induced by the vaccines. Yeadon has gone so far as to call vanden Bossche's position evil, i.e, deliberately false. 7. Yeadon claims, correctly I believe, that Covid variants will not escape Covid T-cell immunity. With respect to this point, however, it is the case that apart from those who have already been infected with Covid or a sufficiently closely related Corona virus, none have Covid T-cell immunity. Moreover, Yeadon does not deal with the question of neutralizing Covid antibodies, i.e., whether the mRNA vaccines can in fact work, or whether even minor genetic differentiation in the circulating virus result in immune escape from vaccine induced antibodies. Rather, Yeadon turns to the "top-up" vaccines being prepared now to induce antibody immunity to the antibody immune-escape variants. These booster shots, he fears, are designed not to restore Covid immunity but to use genetic technology to kill you. Unfortunately, there is no real public debate among experts to discuss these issues. Specifically about: (a) How effective can antibody immunity to Covid be (the number of so-called break-through Covid infections of vaccinated individuals suggests that it is not very effective) and how rapidly is Covid escape from antibody immunity through genetic differentiation occurring; and (b) What possibility exists that an intentionally lethal mechanism could be included in a supposed antibody inducing mRNA vaccine? Instead, we have merely propaganda deployed against anyone who questions the pretty certainly badly if not catastrophically flawed public policy response to Covid-19.

Off Guardian: 10 Covid-Skeptic Memes to Get You Through the Day

BS ALERT: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended that people who have recovered from the Covid-19 virus get vaccinated, arguing that health officials don’t know how long natural immunity lasts. “Even if you have already recovered from COVID-19, it is possible—although rare—that you could be infected with the virus that causes COVID-19 again,*” the CDC says on its website. But even if you have already been vaccinated, IT IS POSSIBLE AND ACTUALLY QUITE LIKELY that you could be infected with the virus that causes COVID-19. But Note: of the two, immunity due to past infection should provide much greater protection than the immunity induced by the so-called "vaccines"since it includes the full spectrum immune response, including long-lasting, probably life-long, T-Cell immunity, as well as the short-lived antibody response induced by the vaccine.  _____ *Presumably what the CDC is trying to say here is that "you could be re-infected with Covid-19, not that you "could be infected with the virus that causes Covid-19 again." Note: there is no virus that "causes Covid-19 again," there is just a virus that causes Covid-19, which, allegedly, may infect you again and again unless you have the vaccine -- a claim in support of which there is little if any evidence, and given the known limitations to the effectiveness of the so-called vaccine, is almost certainly untrue.

Wuhan Lab Staff Hospitalized With Covid-Like Symptoms Before Confirmed Outbreak

MSM Finally Reports on Wuhan Illnesses in November 2019 – More Than A Year After First Reported By the Alt media

The role of vaccinations in India’s SURGING death rate can no longer be denied