Showing posts with label false positive. Show all posts
Showing posts with label false positive. Show all posts

Saturday, May 29, 2021

SARS COV 2 Pandemic: A Joint US:China Biowarfare Defense Exercise?

Is Covid a synthetic virus deployed in a joint US:Chinese exercise to game a pandemic due to a deadly biological weapon of mass destruction?

Accepting that to be so, then the novel corona virus, SARS-CoV2, which is of the type responsible for the common cold, must have been deployed because it is virtually harmless except to elderly people who are liable to be carried off by even a mild  respiratory infection. 

However, this particular strain of corona virus has been souped up through joint US:Chinese "gain-of-function" research to be highly infectious, as would be required of a real WMD.

The PCR test was adopted as the standard means of identifying cases because the symptoms of Covid infection were too  hard to detect, there being no swollen lymph nodes (buboes), pocks, vomiting of blood, etc., to distinguish the infection from, well, a just a common cold.

To induce the state of fear necessary to induce people to participate in the exercise, the virus was released in the vicinity of a Chinese bioweapons research establishment. 

To make the virus especially scary, it was reported to have jumped from bats to humans -- yikes.

Then the Chinese put on a fine bit of theartre, with folks supposedly stricken by the virus dropping in the streets, going into paroxysms, etc.

Other videos showed people in China being nailed up in their homes or being doused in the streets by trucks spraying disinfectant. 

In First World nations, infected hospital patients were forced into care homes for the elderly causing a die-off among the useless eaters. Thus in Canada, over 70% of all reported Covid deaths were "achieved" in this way.

Now almost everyone was scared and there was no trouble getting folks to mask up, while seeking always to maintain their distance from every other human on the face of the earth, even the flesh of their own flesh, their partner in marriage. 

To maintain the fear, the PRC test was amped to give massive numbers of false positive "cases," while anyone dying within 28 days of a positive test was declared a Covid "death" even if the proximal cause of death happened to have been a motor vehicle accident or a bullet to the head. 

Meantime, big pharma worked for a big pay-day by producing a novel type of "vaccine" that does not give you real immunity, just some antibodies to be going on with until a top-up shot, or booster, is required. 

Most people were scared enough by now to get "vaccinated" as soon as possible, and those who were reluctant were being bullied into it by being labelled vaccine hesitant, anti-vaxx or just plain conspiracy nuts. 

Moreover, the "hesitant" were threatened with the introduction of a vaccine passport, for the lack thereof, they would be barred from virtually every social space and function, a fate unavoidable without getting the shot, plus the booster and the top-up and whatever else the authorities decide it is necessary that the people be injected with. 

Meantime the case count as determined by the dodgy PCR test showed the virus to be coming in waves, while genome analysis showed it to be fissioning into multiple variants, each potentially more deadly than the last. 

Thus it was decided that salvation, for which the people were now desperately anxious, could be achieved only by locking all but essential workers at home. 

Lockdowns, at first known only in totalitarian China, were now essential throughout the developed world, although poorer countries, where lockdown was impractical since it would mean general starvation, seemed to suffer no worse from Covid than the developed world.

But even in the developed world, lockdowns were not without catastrophic consequences for millions upon millions of small business, many of which have been driven to permanent closure. 

Meantime, at vast public expense, governments established schemes to track and trace the virus, and great fortunes must have been made by those with good government connections in the face-mask and hand sanitizer, and PCR testing sectors of the economy.

At some point, in the next 12 months, the exercise will hopefully be wound up and the world will return to something like normal, but better prepared,perhaps, for all out war with biological weapons of mass destruction.

Related: 

LA Times: Trump administration ended pandemic early-warning program to detect coronaviruses

Daily Mail: COVID-19 'has NO credible natural ancestor'

Martin Armstrong: Collapse in Confidence: Vaccine Refusal

Luc Montagnier (The Nobel Prize winner who isolated the AIDS virus)The COVID-19 Shots are Creating “Variants”

The Daily reckoning: COVID and the Noble Lie

Gateway Pundit: 1,000 Lawyers and 10,000 Doctors Join Together and File Lawsuit to Prosecute the “2nd Nuremburg Tribunal” Against Corona Fraud Scandal

Monday, July 20, 2020

How many Covid diagnoses are false positives?

By Professor Carl Heneghan*

The Spectator, July 20, 2020: Test, test, test said the WHO. And globally, that’s what everyone did: nearly 300 million tests have been done to detect more than 14 million cases of Sars-CoV-2 so far. The thinking goes: turn up, have your test, and if positive, you must have the disease. But that’s far from the truth. When virus levels in the population are very low, the chances of a test accurately detecting Covid-19 are less than 50 per cent – for reasons that are not very widely understood.

There are two issues about tests to get your head around. The first is the sensitivity of the test: the proportion of people who test positive, out of the population who have the virus. The second measure, specificity, is about the proportion of people who test negative, out of the population who should have tested negative. Finding out the actual values for these two measures is tricky. The Office for National Statistics admits they do not ‘know the true sensitivity and specificity of the test because Covid-19 is a new virus’.

Estimates suggest that roughly 80 per cent of infected people will have a positive test (the sensitivity). Based on the latest data, specificity may be as high as 99.9 per cent for those who test negative. I think this is a bit high, but let’s run with it for now.