In this presentation Dr. Yeadon makes no claim that the vaccines are designed to kill people. Furthermore, he says he'd "like to know what's in them," which suggests that he had no real basis for having previously claimed that the vaccines, or the top-up or booster shots, were designed to depopulate the world.
I have to stand up for the guy because I admire what he is trying to do.
ReplyDeleteAs to him not answering questions over at Unz.com, I would defend this in a lawyeresque manner. Yeadon has no duty to answer anybody's questions. There is no obligation to do so. Yeadon does have a right to say what he wants when he wants and where he wants. We can read into what it means when he doesn't respond to questions. He could be evading a serious challenge. But there is also the possibility he is just too busy, or perhaps he did not see the questions posed. It might even be he has visited a site, took a look around, made some comments but then decided not to come back. That's what I have done at Unz.com. At some point I left discussions dangling because I did not like Unz.com. There is quite a bit there which is offensive to me.
About the interview where Yeadon did all the talking. I am not familiar with that particular interviewer, but I am familiar with interviewers lobbing softballs at people such as Bill Gates whom they have an interest in making look good, and being harsh and blocking those whom they disdain and from whom they could gain nothing. There's been some kind of major decline in the quality of interviews over the last thirty years or so.
But that too is just a guess. There's really no way to know what it meant or did not mean.
Here at the rally, he is dressed in jeans, it's informal, and he's basically speaking in a "rally" mode. He's not being technical or giving a lecture. I don't think he would like to be categorized as an anti-vaxxer. He's anti-Covid19 vaccination, clearly, but in one of the interviews to which you provided a link Yeadon was very clear he supported vaccines and even new approaches to vaccination, as well as other pharmaceutical treatments.
Of course, Yeadon is free to decline to answer questions. But when a person makes a habit of engaging in monologue and refuses to answer questions while repeatedly making a most extraordinary claim unsupported by evidence, it is not unreasonable to question their sanity or sincerity.
ReplyDeleteHowever, in the video above, Yeadon pokes some large holes in the official Covid narrative, without reiterating his past claim that the vaccines, or rather the top-up shots or whatever they are called, are designed to kill us all.
I thought this message worth emphasizing, hence the above post.
As for the anti-vax label, that is intended to apply in Yeadon's case, only with respect to the covid vaccines, a position that I am inclined to support, though there are reasons to favor vaccination against covid, but that is a topic for another discussion.
As for the claim that the vaccines or vaccine boosters could be deadly, that is an interesting hypothesis if it has a rational basis. But if it has a rational basis it must be possible to spell out what that basis is.
In particular, what is the proposed mechanism to build lethality into a Covid vaccine, and how could that mechanism be concealed from the thousands of scientists worldwide who have the means to analyse and decode nucleic acids?
ReplyDeleteWe wouldn't know the proposed mechanism because if there is such a proposal it would be kept top secret. So I suppose the real question is could there be such a mechanism, and could it be concealed long enough to administer successfully to very large numbers of people.
To the first question, undoubtedly there are mechanisms. Some people have dropped dead immediately from the "vaccine" due to blood clotting. Whether clotting the blood in such a manner was intended, I honestly doubt. Yet this "side effect" of the "vaccine" is noted and someone out there may have ideas on how to enhance this effect. Or some other thing. The potentials for creating lethality are virtually innumerable.
As to whether you could have people dropping dead as the shot was being administered without medical professionals and others becoming alarmed and notifying each other and the press, this is a question of the effectiveness and probity of our mass media and other means of communication. Obviously this has been vastly curtailed as of late-- I don't think we really know much of anything nowadays about what the hell is going on...This could be just the beginning.
There are places on the earth we masses never hear about from the info-troughs where we get our info-waters. The conditions in some of these places have been, for decades, maybe a century, appalling. They could be seen by the plutocrats as feeder-shitter breeding fever swamps, and it does not seem far-fetched they'd be scheduled for "bye-bye". It doesn't seem far-fetched we'd not hear of it any time soon. Who knows?
But also-- if there are going to be routine boosters, I could foresee this as similar to routinely getting updates automatically installed on my computer. I have no idea what's going on and I have chosen not to worry about it. There are experts out there who could self-appoint themselves the difficult and unrewarded task of going through and determining it is all a-okay with nothing untoward being forced on the ignorant hoi polloi. There could be, but I doubt there are. Remember, we're no longer in the realm of stringent regulation and safeguards regarding what the medical professionals are going to shoot into our bodies.
I do agree Yeadon has made some drastic accusations and maybe he really does have a duty now to flesh them out a bit by giving some details on why he really thinks this way.
"We wouldn't know the proposed mechanism because if there is such a proposal it would be kept top secret.
DeleteBut Yeadon has talked of the vaccines containing "a gene" to induced cancer, etc. But a gene is not a small thing. It could not be hidden in a spike protein mRNA vaccine. Moreover, how's it supposed to work? is it to be incorporated in the genome before being transcribed and translated?
I think Yeadon would do well to engage in debate with someone like VandenBossche. He has called Vanden Bossche evil for raising the issue of vaccine induced immune escape. But Luc Montagnier, Nobel Laureate, the man who isolated the AIDS virus, makes the same claim as Vanden Bossche.
An debate among experts on these issues is what's needed.
"An debate among experts on these issues is what's needed."
DeleteExactly. I think what this means a return to science. It wouldn't be a political debate, but more of defining what we know, what we don't know, how to go about defining what's most important among the items we don't know, and then going after them.
It is almost sad to see Yeadon and the others playing on-the-spot amateur politicians. Yet this is a role they are forced to play by this pathetic place we're now in where science is mixed up with politics and vice versa.
And this looks like an interesting development:
Delete1,000 Lawyers and 10,000 Doctors Join Together and File Lawsuit to Prosecute the “2nd Nuremburg Tribunal” Against Corona Fraud Scandal