Wednesday, April 21, 2021

Vaccine Passports: The Route To Techno-Tyranny


Related: 

So to drive Covid deaths to virtually zero, it was necessary only to warn the overweight and elderly to take care, avoid crowds, especially of the young and socially active, and let everyone else get on with their lives.
But the opportunity to subject the population to tyrannical control while driving national debt to World War levels through multiple profitable boondoggles for their friends, was too great for any democratic government to resist. 
UK War on Pubs is About Silencing Dissent

Tuesday, April 20, 2021

You Have to Read This Letter

  New York father pulls his daughter out of Brearley with a message to the whole school. Is the dam starting to break?

I was planning to publish a roundup today of the many thoughtful responses to Paul Rossi’s essay. I’m going to save that post for Sunday, because I was just sent this letter that has my jaw on the floor. It was written by a Brearley parent named Andrew Gutmann.

If you don’t know about Brearley, it’s a private all-girls school on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. It costs $54,000 a year and prospective families apparently have to take an “anti-racism pledge” to be considered for admission. (In the course of my reporting for this piece I spoke to a few Brearley parents.)

Gutmann chose to pull his daughter, who has been in the school since kindergarten, and sent this missive to all 600 or so families in the school earlier this week. Among the lines:

If Brearley’s administration was truly concerned about so-called “equity,” it would be discussing the cessation of admissions preferences for legacies, siblings, and those families with especially deep pockets. If the administration was genuinely serious about “diversity,” it would not insist on the indoctrination of its students, and their families, to a single mindset, most reminiscent of the Chinese Cultural Revolution.

I’m pasting the whole thing below.

Read More: If you hate bullshit, you'll surely enjoy it

(with thanks to the Maverick Philosopher)

Related:

DM: 'This is not a rich person issue, this is not a NYC issue, this is an American issue': Parent and teacher who spoke out against 'woke' antiracist doctrine in their expensive NY private schools warn it is infecting all US schools


Monday, April 19, 2021

Peer Reviewed Study: Facemasks Have Adverse Physiological, Psychological and Health Effects

 Many countries across the globe utilized medical and non-medical facemasks as non-pharmaceutical intervention for reducing the transmission and infectivity of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Although, scientific evidence supporting facemasks’ efficacy is lacking, adverse physiological, psychological and health effects are established. Is has been hypothesized that facemasks have compromised safety and efficacy profile and should be avoided from use. The current article comprehensively summarizes scientific evidences with respect to wearing facemasks in the COVID-19 era, providing prosper information for public health and decisions making.

Read more

Related:

Thousands Of Oregonians ‘Openly Hostile’ To Democratic Governor’s ‘Permanent’ Mask Mandate

And from the Puff Ho:

Saturday, April 17, 2021

World War III to Begin Next Wednesday

Hal Turner: When Ambassador John Sullivan arrived at Russia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Thursday, April 15, he was told "The United States has six days to cease all NATO activity inside Ukraine. Otherwise Russia will attack Ukraine and stop the NATO activity itself."

Forget the vaccine, get a hard hat. 

Why You'll Always Have to Wear a Mask

 Excerpts from an article by Michael Snyder

This week, [the CEO of Pfizer admitted that] “fully vaccinated” people will need a third shot of the vaccine within 12 months

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said people will “likely” need a third dose of a Covid-19 vaccine within 12 months of getting fully vaccinated. His comments were made public Thursday but were taped April 1.

Bourla said it’s possible people will need to get vaccinated against the coronavirus annually.

According to the CDC, so far there have been almost 6,000 documented cases of people being infected after getting two shots, and dozens of them have died

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has reported that roughly 5,800 people who received a coronavirus vaccine still ultimately came down with the disease anyway, according to CNN.

Of those 5,800, 396 of them (roughly 7 percent) were hospitalized; 74 of the vaccinated people ultimately died. The report proves that the vaccines, though frequently touted by the government and the media, are not guaranteed to prevent everyone from contracting the virus.

The reason why a new flu vaccine comes out every year is because the flu is constantly changing and mutating.The same thing is happening to COVID, and there are already dozens of mutant variations spreading around the globe [which may not be controlled by existing vaccines]. Here is
just one example

Two doses of the AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine were found to have only a 10.4% efficacy against mild-to-moderate infections caused by the B.1.351 South Africa variant, according to a phase 1b-2 clinical trial published on Tuesday in the New England Journal of Medicine. This is a cause for grave concern as the South African variants share similar mutations to the other variants leaving those vaccinated with the AstraZeneca vaccine potentially exposed to multiple variants.
A few days ago, the FDA issued an unprecedented order regarding the Johnson and Johnson vaccine because it was causing blood clots in a number of cases…

This week, the Food and Drug Administration called for a halt in the administration of the single dose vaccine for COVID-19 manufactured by Johnson and Johnson. The halt was ascribed to the rare incidence of blood clots that could potentially be related to the vaccine.

I am glad that the FDA decided to step in, but the order came too late for this guy

When the news broke about the pause of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine Tuesday, one Coast family was already living with a tragedy they believe was caused by the vaccine.

It started out as a normal day for 43-year-old Brad Malagarie of St. Martin. This busy father of seven spent the morning at his D’Iberville office before heading to get a Johnson & Johnson vaccine a little after noon.

He returned to work, and within three hours coworkers noticed he was unresponsive at his desk. .

Meantime 

In Britain, where nearly everyone's been vaccinated, Government Advisers, aka, the notorious SAGE, are calling for more lockdowns

The London Independent reports:

…a top scientist advising the government has said local restrictions may need to be reintroduced if surge testing fails to halt the spread of the South African Covid variant.

Professor John Edmunds, an epidemiologist at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, told ITV’s Peston show that if mass testing events, such as those currently underway in Southwark and Barnet in London, “don’t work that well … then it’s possible we’ll have to impose some sort of local restrictions back in place ...”.

And, from UK PM Boris Johnson:

"The reduction in numbers... has not been achieved by the vaccination programme... the bulk of the work in reducing the disease has been done by the lockdown"

and despite the mass vaccination campaign, thus far the world's most intensive, Johnson said:

there will be more deaths as [lockdown] rules ease.
The Bad News
More than 10,000 people died shortly after COVID-19 vaccination in December, US and European authorities saidDeaths include more than 7,100 in Europe, according to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and 3,005 reported by the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC), LifeSiteNews reports. And that was just in one month. 

NewsTarget.com: Sailors in the Australian Navy have been dropping like flies ever since Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) vaccines became available to them

And closer to home: 
British Columbia: One Dead, Three Neurologically Disabled, ‘Numerous’ Reactions from Vaccine in Tiny Indigenous Village

The Good News

Tucker Carlson: Is Fauci Saying the Vaccine Doesn't Protect from Covid?



Thursday, April 15, 2021

Was the Covid Second Wave a Consequence of Lockdowns, Social Distancing and Face Masks?

 Last fall, immunologist and biotech entrepreneur Dr. Michael Yeadon argued that a Covid second wave was impossible, saying "that's not how epidemics work." The pathogen, he stated, spreads until it runs out of susceptible hosts. All those who survive infection acquire robust and durable immunity, and the population thus achieves what is known as herd immunity, which makes a second wave impossible. 

However, as it emerges, the data for many countries appear to contradict Dr. Yeadon. Thus, for example, in Britain, the second wave of Covid deaths appears, if anything, slightly greater than the first. 

There are many questions that may be raised as to the validity of the data. How many, for example, of those who died with Covid died because of Covid? And how were the reported number of Covid cases affected by the availability of tests and the reliability of tests?


Nevertheless, the available evidence raises the question: is Dr. Yeadon's understanding of epidemiology wrong, or has something weird happened that caused the Covid epidemic to follow an abnormal course? 

The latter explanation seems highly probable. 

As the first wave of Covid infections developed, many countries imposed strict limitations on human existence, confining people to their homes, and enforcing mask mandates and social distancing when people were allowed out. 

The inevitable consequence of these measures was that there remained a substantial proportion of the population unexposed to Covid, which is to say that the number of those susceptible to Covid remained much higher than would have been the case had the first wave been allowed to run its course without impediment. Inevitably, therefore, when restrictions on human interaction were relieved a second wave of infections occurred during the following winter flu season. 

In Britain the second wave was curbed, as was the first, by lockdowns, travel restrictions, working from home, etc. Now a mass Covid vaccination campaign is underway that will presumably prevent a third wave -- for now. 

Almost certainly, however, we have not seen the last of Covid, as the immunity induced by the novel mRNA "vaccines" is reported to be short-lived. So look forward to repeated outbreaks and vaccination drives. 

As to future Covid deaths, the numbers will depend largely on how those who are already near death are cared for. Already Covid has lowered life expectancy by a year and more in most countries, but the trend in declining life expectancy will continue as long as elderly hospital patients and care home residents remain at high risk of infection. 

Happily, for those under sixty, the risk of death by Covid will remain minimal with our without vaccination. 


Monday, April 12, 2021

Former Pfizer VP and Chief Science Officer: ‘Your government is lying to you [and it] could lead to your death.’


Why is my government lying to me? Because they are going to kill you.

‘Look out the window, and think, “why is my government lying to me about something so fundamental?” Because, I think the answer is, they are going to kill you using this method. They’re going to kill you and your family.’

Wed Apr 7, 2021 - 8:47 am EST

Dr. Mike YeadonArshad Ebrahim / YouTube

By Patrick Delaney

April 7, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — Dr. Michael Yeadon, Pfizer's former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory who spent 32 years in the industry leading new medicines research and retired from the pharmaceutical giant with “the most senior research position” in his field, spoke with LifeSiteNews.

He addressed the “demonstrably false” propaganda from governments in response to COVID-19, including the “lie” of dangerous variants, the totalitarian potential for “vaccine passports,” and the strong possibility we are dealing with a “conspiracy” which could lead to something far beyond the carnage experienced in the wars and massacres of the 20th century.

His main points included:

There is “no possibility” current variants of COVID-19 will escape immunity. It is “just a lie.”

Yet, governments around the world are repeating this lie, indicating that we are witnessing not just “convergent opportunism,” but a “conspiracy.” Meanwhile media outlets and Big Tech platforms are committed to the same propaganda and the censorship of the truth.

Pharmaceutical companies have already begun to develop unneeded “top-up” (“booster”) vaccines for the “variants.” The companies are planning to manufacture billions of vials, in addition to the current experimental COVID-19 “vaccine” campaign.

Regulatory agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, have announced that since these “top-up” vaccines will be so similar to the prior injections which were approved for emergency use authorization, drug companies will not be required to “perform any clinical safety studies.”

Thus, this virtually means that design and implementation of repeated and coerced mRNA vaccines “go from the computer screen of a pharmaceutical company into the arms of hundreds of millions of people, [injecting] some superfluous genetic sequence for which there is absolutely no need or justification.”


Why are they doing this? Since no benign reason is apparent, the use of vaccine passports along with a “banking reset” could issue in a totalitarianism unlike the world has ever seen. Recalling the evil of Stalin, Mao, and Hitler, “mass depopulation” remains a logical outcome.

The fact that this at least could be true means everyone must “fight like crazy to make sure that system never forms.”

Dr. Yeadon began identifying himself as merely a “boring guy” who went “to work for a big drug company … listening to the main national broadcast and reading the broad sheet newspapers.”

Continuing, he said: “But in the last year I have realized that my government and its advisers are lying in the faces of the British people about everything to do with this coronavirus. Absolutely everything. It’s a fallacy this idea of asymptomatic transmission and that you don’t have symptoms, but you are a source of a virus. That lockdowns work, that masks have a protective value obviously for you or someone else, and that variants are scary things and we even need to close international borders in case some of these nasty foreign variants get in.

Sunday, April 11, 2021

Claiming Covid Herd Immunity Through Vaccination Is Nonsense

By P. Jerome

Off Guardian March 30, 2021: The efforts to require every American to be injected with an experimental vaccine for Covid-19 are based on the false notion that vaccination will protect recipients from becoming infected with SARS-Cov-2, the virus that causes Covid-19, or protect them from passing along the infection to other people.

The FDA, the CDC, the NIH and the pharmaceutical companies involved have all stated very clearly that there is no evidence to support this idea.

None of the three experimental Covid-19 vaccines now being distributed in the United States have been demonstrated to protect against infection with or transmission of the virus believed to cause Covid-19 (SARS-CoV-2), or even prevent symptoms of Covid-19 disease from developing.

This fact is indisputable, yet media, medical providers, and politicians continue to repeat the lie that vaccination provides “immunity to Covid” and even sources like the Mayo Clinic make irresponsible and unsubstantiated claims that vaccination “might prevent you from getting” or “spreading” Covid-19. The same lies are the basis for President Biden’s hard press for mass vaccination to “make this Independence Day truly special.”


Related:

“The Shock Troops Are Coming!” – 200 Heavily-Armed Canadian Police Deployed to Edmonton Church to Harass Christians

Saturday, April 10, 2021

Canada's Covid Epidemic, Or Is It a Scamdemic?

 "Variants Projected to Climb in May, Tighter Measures Urged," reads the Page 4 headline in today's (Victoria) TimesColonist

And, as the article so headlined reports, British Columbia now has 102 Covid patients in intensive care. 

Wow, that sure is scary. 

Um, well maybe not, though sure it's tough on the unfortunate 102. 

One hundred and two ICU patients equals zero point six naughts two percent of British Columbia's population of five million. 

So how unusual is it to have that many ICU patients with a respiratory disease? 

Perhaps not very. Respiratory disease, mainly flu or pneumonia, is a major cause of death, and those deaths usually come in a bunch at the peak of the flu season. So to have half of British Columbia's ICU beds occupied by Covid patients at what is supposed to be a new peak in Covid infections, is neither surprising, nor especially alarming. 

What is, if not alarming, certainly remarkable is the change in the ratio of reported Covid cases to deaths over the course of the epidemic. 

On May 6, 2020, which was the peak of the epidemic in British Columbia, as measured by deaths, 1450 new Covid cases were reported together with 189 Covid deaths. 

Now, as we are reported to be battling a massive covid second wave, something surprising has happened: 

While cases as reported the day before yesterday (April 8, 2021) are up more than five-fold from the May 6, 2020 peak, deaths are down five-fold, to a daily total of 38. So the ratio of deaths to cases has dropped from one in 7.7 to one in 210. 

How to account for this? 

Almost certainly it is the result of increased use of the PCR Covid test which has a huge false positive rate. 

Because of the use of the highly misleading test, both cases and deaths are almost certainly being greatly exaggerated, but as the actual number of Covid deaths is declining, whereas the number being tested for Covid is increasing, the number of false positive cases inevitably grows faster than the number of false positive deaths. 

But hear it from Dr. Yeadon, with reference to the UK, in this conversation with James Delingpole. 

According to Yeadon, the Covid epidemic in Britain would be long over except that SAGE, the UK Government's Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies says it is not. 

Further, he asserts that Britain achieved Covid19 herd immunity by the summer of last year, due largely to the existence in the population of pre-existent T-Cell immunity resulting from infection from other corona viruses, including several common cold viruses. 

For similar reasons,it is likely that, in Canada, the Covid19 epidemic continues because the Government of Canada and Provincial premiers prefer to mess with peoples' lives and piss away billions for unnecessary Covid relief measures than acknowledge reality. 

Related: 

Another Covid Myth Dies the Death

Latest Vaccine Flip-flop Gives the Vaccine Game Away

How well does the Astra-Zeneca vaccine work in the elderly?  Only two months ago the leaders of France and Germany told us: Officials in Germany claim the Astra-Zeneca vaccine  is only 8% effective in those over 65.

The purpose of the vaccines is obviously not to protect us. The vaccines enrich Pharma. The vaccine passports enable much greater control over the citizenry. There may be additional agendas.  But this is clearly not about our health. 

The WHO Confirms that the Covid-19 PCR Test is Flawed: Estimates of “Positive Cases” are Meaningless. The Lockdown Has No Scientific Basis 

YOUNG PEOPLE ARE NOW DYING FOLLOWING THE EXPERIMENTAL JOHNSON AND JOHNSON COVID VACCINE INJECTIONS

Fresh blow for AstraZeneca as vaccine is linked to another dangerous blood condition in Europe 


Friday, April 9, 2021

Tucker Carlson on the Democratic Party Importing Their Own Electors

ADL Demands Tucker Carlson Be Fired For Discussing 'Replacement Theory'

So the ADL is OK with replacement of the American nation, but have a thing about the Holocaust. Is that inconsistent, or what?



Uhuh! Google just flushed that one down the Memory Hole. 

Related:




The Great Displacement: 172,000 People Arrested Crossing from Mexico into the US in March Alone

How Google's Fucking You

 Ephemeral Experiences:

Big Tech's Greatest Threat

"They leave no paper trail for authorities to trace. They are the perfect weapon for changing... the outcome of elections"



  • "Ephemeral experiences": You might never have heard this phrase, but it's a very important concept. These are brief experiences you have online in which content appears briefly and then disappears, leaving no trace. Those are the kinds of experiences we have been preserving in our election monitoring projects. You can't see the search results that Google was showing you last month. They're not stored anywhere, so they leave no paper trail for authorities to trace. Ephemeral experiences are, it turns out, quite a powerful tool of manipulation.

  • Are people at companies like Google aware of the power they have? Absolutely...

  • In a national study we conducted in 2013, in one demographic group -- moderate Republicans -- we got a shift of 80% after just one search, so some people are especially trusting of search results, and Google knows this. The company can easily manipulate undecided voters using techniques like this....

  • We have shown in controlled experiments that biased search suggestions can turn a 50‑50 split among undecided voters into a 90‑10 split, with no one having the slightest idea they have been manipulated.

  • Unfortunately, people mistakenly believe that computer output must be impartial and objective. People especially trust Google to give them accurate results.... They have no idea that they may have been driven to that web page by highly biased search results that favor the candidate Google is supporting.

  • Dwight D. Eisenhower did not talk about his accomplishments in his famous farewell speech of 1961. Instead, he warned us about the rise of a "technological elite" who could control public policy without anyone knowing. He warned us about a future in which democracy would be meaningless. What I have to tell you is this: The technological elite are now in control. You just don't know it. Big Tech had the ability to shift 15 million votes in 2020 without anyone knowing that they did so and without leaving a paper trail for authorities to trace. Our calculations suggest that they actually shifted at least six million votes to President Biden without people knowing. This makes the free-and-fair election -- a cornerstone of democracy -- an illusion.

  • I am not a conservative, so I should be thrilled about what these companies are doing. But no one should be thrilled, no matter what one's politics. No private company should have this kind of power, even if, at the moment, they happen to be supporting your side.

  • Do these companies think they are in charge? Are they planning a future that only they know for all of us? Unfortunately, there are many indications that the answers to these questions are yes.

  • One of the items that leaked from Google in 2018 was an eight‑minute video called "The Selfish Ledger." This video was never meant to be seen outside of Google, and it is about the power that Google has to reshape humanity, to create computer software that "not only tracks our behavior but offers direction towards a desired result."

  • How do we protect ourselves from companies like this?... You might have heard the phrase "regulatory capture" -- an old practice in which a large company that is facing punishment from the government works with the government to come up with a regulatory plan that suits the company.

  • When you are talking about, for example, "breaking up" Google, all this means is that we will force them to sell off a couple of the hundreds of companies they have bought.... the major shareholders are enriched by billions of dollars, and the company still has the same power and poses the same threats it does today....

  • [W]e were, in effect, doing the same thing to them that they do to us and our children 24 hours a day. Imagine that we were, in effect, looking over the shoulders of thousands of real people (with their permission), just as the Nielsen Company does with its network of families to monitor their television watching.

  • Imagine if these tech companies knew that they were being monitored -- that even the answers they are giving people... were being monitored. Do you think they would risk sending out targeted vote reminders to members of just one political party? I doubt it very much, because we would catch them immediately and report their manipulation to authorities and the media.

  • What can we do? In my opinion, the solution to almost all the problems these companies present is to set up large‑scale monitoring systems and to make them permanent -- not just in the United States, but around the world. Because monitoring is technology, it can keep up with whatever the new tech companies are throwing at us, and however they are threatening us, we can get them to stop.

  • I am envisioning a new nonprofit organization that specializes in monitoring what the tech companies are showing to voters, families, and children -- protecting democracy and the autonomy and independence of all citizens. There might also be a for‑profit spinoff that could serve as a permanent funding source for the nonprofit. The for‑profit spinoff could provide commercial services to campaigns, law firms, candidates, researchers, and many others.

  • And there's another way to completely eliminate the threats that Google poses to democracy and humanity.... our government could quickly end Google's monopoly on search by declaring that the database Google uses to generate search results is a "public commons," accessible to all. It is a very old legal concept, and it is a light-touch form of regulation. It would rapidly lead to the creation of thousands of competing search platforms, each appealing to different audiences.

Wednesday, April 7, 2021

Dr. Michael Yeadon, former Pfizer Vice President and Chief Science Officer, explains how Britain made a flu-like disease called Covid into a national disaster

Yesterday I posted an article from American Front Line Doctors based on a conversation with former Pfizer Vice President and Chief Science Officer, Dr. Mike Yeadon, concerning his view of the Covid19 pandemic and Britain's response to it. 

At the time, I was unaware that the links in that article, as posted here, were not working. That problem is now fixed. Among those links is one to a videotaped interview Dr. Yeadon gave in November last year in which he argues with both clarity and authority that:

(1) the Covid epidemic in Britain has long passed its peak; 
(2) the UK Government's scientific advisory group, SAGE, using an inappropriate criterion, massively underestimated the proportion of the population with Covid immunity;
(3) highly sensitive antibody tests have shown that 65% of UK care home residents who were never sick with Covid, had Covid antibodies, indicating pre-existent immunity, likely from exposure to other corona viruses, including some common cold viruses;
(4) the British population now has Covid19 herd immunity, and has had since early summer last year;
(5) the number of cases reported is hugely exaggerated because of the use of a totally unreliable PCR test which yields a huge false positive rate; 
(6) the number of deaths reported is hugely exaggerated for the same reason the number of cases is hugely exaggerated, because of the use of a totally unreliable PCR test which yields a huge false positive rate; 
(7) lockdowns, which cause great damage both economically and to the mental health of many people, do nothing to limit the spread of the virus; 
(8) differences in case rates and death rates among countries likely reflect the severity in each country of the previous year's flu season, as that determines the number of very fragile old people who are at high risk of death from a respiratory virus. 

From the video, it is clear that Dr. Yeadon is both smart and well informed, and absolutely worth the attention of anyone seriously interested in why, in the name of Covid, life in most Western countries is being totally disrupted: disrupted, so Dr. Yeadon covincingly argues, for no good reason.

Here's the video:

 

Postscript:

Last November, when Dr. Yeadon made the above statement, UK excess death stats, if taken as a proxy for Covid mortality, were consistent with Yeadon's contention that the Covid epidemic was over.

However, in 2021, deaths reported as due to covid have spiked even higher than in the spring of 2020, reaching a peak of around of 1725 on January 27, 2021, versus a one-day total of 942 at the peak in the spring of 2020. 

But, as the above-linked UK excess deaths chart indicates, there is no corresponding rise in excess deaths in 2021. The implication is thus strong that the 2021 rise in Covid "deaths" is an artifact due to the increased and enormously expensive use of the now widely discredited PCR test for Covid19, which is known to generate huge numbers of false positives. 

Altogether, the evidence supports Dr. Yeadon's claim that the Covid epidemic in Britain passed its peak in the spring of 2020, at which time the mainly asymptomatic spread of the disease had resulted in widespread and long-lasting immunity, aka herd immunity. 

If that is the case, all the rest, the lockdowns, face masks, social distancing, school closures, multi-billion-pound testing, track and trace, economic disruption, looting of the Treasury, etc., has all been fraud, theft, bullshit, and mass imbecility. 

And if the truth ever gets out, the only thing that will save the utterly disgusting Johnson government are the contemptible social climbers of the Blair, Brown, Milliband and Starmer ilk -- haters all of the stinking masses -- who constitute Her Majesty's [dis]Loyal Opposition. 

Related: 

CoronaVirus Predictive Programming: Dr Leonard Horowitz

F.O.I Request shows 2,207 died within 28 days of having the Covid Vaccine in Scotland during February


What we are seeing is a progressive coup against America's constitutional government by shyster plutocrats and tech companies, including Google, which owns U-Tube -- the 21st Century's Memory Hole, which, while progressively throttling it, hosts this blog.

British Medical Journal: Covid-19: politicisation, “corruption,” and suppression of science
  

Tuesday, April 6, 2021

Former Pfizer Vice President: Covid "vaccines" may be a prelude to global depopulation

by Mordechai Sones

AFLDS, March 25, 2021: America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) spoke to former Pfizer Vice President and Chief Science Officer Dr. Mike Yeadon about his views on the COVID-19 vaccine, hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, the regulatory authorities, and more.

At the outset, Dr. Yeadon said “I’m well aware of the global crimes against humanity being perpetrated against a large proportion of the worlds population.

“I feel great fear, but I’m not deterred from giving expert testimony to multiple groups of able lawyers like Rocco Galati in Canada and Reiner Fuellmich in Germany.

“I have absolutely no doubt that we are in the presence of evil (not a determination I’ve ever made before in a 40-year research career) and dangerous products.

“In the U.K., it’s abundantly clear that the authorities are bent on a course which will result in administering ‘vaccines’ to as many of the population as they can. This is madness, because even if these agents were legitimate, protection is needed only by those at notably elevated risk of death from the virus. In those people, there might even be an argument that the risks are worth bearing. And there definitely are risks which are what I call ‘mechanistic’: inbuilt in the way they work.

“But all the other people, those in good health and younger than 60 years, perhaps a little older, they don’t perish from the virus. In this large group, it’s wholly unethical to administer something novel and for which the potential for unwanted effects after a few months is completely uncharacterized.

“In no other era would it be wise to do what is stated as the intention.

“Since I know this with certainty, and I know those driving it know this too, we have to enquire: What is their motive?

“While I don’t know, I have strong theoretical answers, only one of which relates to money and that motive doesn’t work, because the same quantum can be arrived at by doubling the unit cost and giving the agent to half as many people. Dilemma solved. So it’s something else.

Appreciating that, by entire population, it is also intended that minor children and eventually babies are to be included in the net, ... that’s what I interpret to be an evil act. 

“There is no medical rationale for it. Knowing as I do that the design of these ‘vaccines’ results, in the expression in the bodies of recipients, expression of the spike protein, which has adverse biological effects of its own which, in some people, are harmful (initiating blood coagulation and activating the immune ‘complement system’), I’m determined to point out that those not at risk from this virus should not be exposed to the risk of unwanted effects from these agents.”

AFLDS: The Israel Supreme Court decision last week cancelling COVID flight restrictions said: “In the future, any new restrictions on travel into or out of Israel need, in legal terms, a comprehensive, factual, data-based foundation.”

In a talk you gave four months ago, you said:

“The most likely duration of immunity to a respiratory virus like SARS CoV-2 is multiple years. Why do I say that? We actually have the data for a virus that swept through parts of the world seventeen years ago called SARS, and remember SARS CoV-2 is 80% similar to SARS, so I think that’s the best comparison that anyone can provide.

“The evidence is clear: These very clever cellular immunologists studied all the people they could get hold of who had survived SARS 17 years ago. They took a blood sample, and they tested whether they responded or not to the original SARS and they all did; they all had perfectly normal, robust T cell memory. They were actually also protected against SARS CoV-2, because they’re so similar; it’s cross immunity.

“So, I would say the best data that exists is that immunity should be robust for at least 17 years. I think it’s entirely possible that it is lifelong. The style of the responses of these people’s T cells were the same as if you’ve been vaccinated and then you come back years later to see if that immunity has been retained. So I think the evidence is really strong that the duration of immunity will be multiple years, and possibly lifelong.”

In other words, previous exposure to SARS – that is, a variant similar to SARS CoV-2 – bestowed SARS CoV-2 immunity.

The Israel government cites new variants to justify lockdowns, flight closures, restrictions, and Green Passport issuance. Given the Supreme Court verdict, do you think it may be possible to preempt future government measures with accurate information about variants, immunity, herd immunity, etc. that could be provided to the lawyers who will be challenging those future measures?

Yeadon: “What I outlined in relation to immunity to SARS is precisely what we’re seeing with SARS-CoV-2.

The study is from one of the best labs in their field.

“So, theoretically, people could test their T-cell immunity by measuring the responses of cells in a small sample of their blood. There are such tests, they are not “high throughput” and they are likely to cost a few hundred USD each on scale. But not thousands. The test I’m aware of is not yet commercially available, but research only in U.K.

“However, I expect the company could be induced to provide test kits “for research” on scale, subject to an agreement. If you were to arrange to test a few thousand non vaccinated Israelis, it may be a double edged sword. Based on other countries experiences, 30-50% of people had prior immunity & additionally around 25% have been infected & are now immune.

“Personally, I wouldn’t want to deal with the authorities on their own terms: that you’re suspected as a source of infection until proven otherwise. 

You shouldn’t need to be proving you’re not a health risk to others. Those without symptoms are never a health threat to others. 

And in any case, once those who are concerned about the virus are vaccinated, there is just no argument for anyone else needing to be vaccinated.”

My understanding of a “leaky vaccine” is that it only lessens symptoms in the vaccinated, but does not stop transmission; it therefore allows the spread of what then becomes a more deadly virus.

For example, in China they deliberately use leaky Avian Flu vaccines to quickly cull flocks of chicken, because the unvaccinated die within three days. In Marek’s Disease, from which they needed to save all the chickens, the only solution was to vaccinate 100% of the flock, because all unvaccinated were at high risk of death to how a leaky vax is utilized is intention-driven, that is, it is possible that the intent can be to cause great harm to the unvaccinated.


Stronger strains usually would not propagate through a population because they kill the host too rapidly, but if the vaccinated experience only less-serious disease, then they spread these strains to the unvaccinated who contract serious disease and die.

Do you agree with this assessment? Furthermore, do you agree that if the unvaccinated become the susceptible ones, the only way forward is HCQ prophylaxis for those who haven’t already had COVID-19?

Would the Zelenko Protocol work against these stronger strains if this is the case?

And if many already have the aforementioned previous “17-year SARS immunity”, would that then not protect from any super-variant?

“I think the Gerrt Vanden Bossche story is highly suspect. There is no evidence at all that vaccination is leading or will lead to ‘dangerous variants’. I am worried that it’s some kind of trick.

“As a general rule, variants form very often, routinely, and tend to become less dangerous & more infectious over time, as it comes into equilibrium with its human host. Variants generally don’t become more dangerous.

“No variant differs from the original sequence by more than 0.3%. In other words, all variants are at least 99.7% identical to the Wuhan sequence.

“It’s a fiction, and an evil one at that, that variants are likely to “escape immunity”.

“Not only is it intrinsically unlikely – because this degree of similarity of variants means zero chance that an immune person (whether from natural infection or from vaccination) will be made ill by a variant – but it’s empirically supported by high-quality research.

“The research I refer to shows that people recovering from infection or who have been vaccinated ALL have a wide range of immune cells which recognize ALL the variants.

This paper shows WHY the extensive molecular recognition by the immune system makes the tiny changes in variants irrelevant.

“I cannot say strongly enough: The stories around variants and need for top up vaccines are FALSE.

I am concerned there is a very malign reason behind all this. It is certainly not backed by the best ways to look at immunity. The claims always lack substance when examined, and utilize various tricks, like manipulating conditions for testing the effectiveness of antibodies. Antibodies are probably rather unimportant in host protection against this virus. There have been a few ‘natural experiments’, people who unfortunately cannot make antibodies, yet are able quite successfully to repel this virus. They definitely are better off with antibodies than without. I mention these rare patients because they show that antibodies are not essential to host immunity, so some contrived test in a lab of antibodies and engineered variant viruses do NOT justify need for top up vaccines.

“The only people who might remain vulnerable and need prophylaxis or treatment are those who are elderly and/or ill and do not wish to receive a vaccine (as is their right).

“The good news is that there are multiple choices available: hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, budesonide (inhaled steroid used in asthmatics), and of course oral Vitamin D, zinc, azithromycin etc. These reduce the severity to such an extent that this virus did not need to become a public health crisis.”

Do you feel the FDA does a good job regulating big pharma? In what ways does big pharma get around the regulator? Do you feel they did so for the mRNA injection?

“Until recently, I had high regard for global medicines regulators. When I was in Pfizer, and later CEO of a biotech I founded (Ziarco, later acquired by Novartis), we interacted respectfully with FDA, EMA, and the U.K. MHRA. Always good quality interactions.

“Recently, I noticed that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) had made a grant to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)! 

Can that ever be appropriate? They’re funded by public money. They should never accept money from a private body.

“So here is an example where the U.K. regulator has a conflict of interest.

“The European Medicines Agency failed to require certain things as disclosed in the ‘hack’ of their files while reviewing the Pfizer vaccine.

“You can find examples on Reiner Fuellmich’s “Corona Committee” online.

“So I no longer believe the regulators are capable of protecting us. ‘Approval’ is therefore meaningless.

“Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg and I petitioned the EMA Dec 1, 2020 on the genetic vaccines. They ignored us.

“Recently, we wrote privately to them, warning of blood clots, they ignored us. When we went public with our letter, we were completely censored. Days later, more than ten countries paused use of a vaccine citing blood clots.

“I think the big money of pharma plus cash from BMGF creates the environment where saying no just isn’t an option for the regulator.

“I must return to the issue of ‘top up vaccines’ (booster shots) and it is this whole narrative which I fear will he exploited and used to gain unparalleled power over us.

“PLEASE warn every person not to go near top up vaccines. There is absolutely no need to them.

“As there’s no need for them, yet they’re being made in pharma, and regulators have stood aside (no safety testing), I can only deduce they will be used for nefarious purposes.


“For example, if someone wished to harm or kill a significant proportion of the world's population over the next few years, the systems being put in place right now will enable it.

It’s my considered view that it is entirely possible that this will be used for massive-scale depopulation.”

Monday, April 5, 2021

Why Would Anyone Who Values Free Speech Use Twitter or Facebook?

No thoughtful user of Twitter or FaceBook can be unaware that political speech on those platforms is censored. Moreover, only the dullest or most inexperienced person can be unaware that Twitter and Facebook censor speech to insure conformity with the narrative of the corporate media. But for the benefit of any who may be unaware of that fact, consider this:

True, when Twitter says "This tweet is misleading" that is, technically, not censorship. 

Rather it is indoctrination, designed not merely to keep you ignorant, but to prompt you to assimilate the official line, namely, that "health officials recommend a vaccine for most people", meaning children, and even babies, presumably.

And  that claim is true. Dr. Fauci, the world's best known Covid-related "health official" apparently wants kids and babies vaccinated

The problem with that is that Covid vaccines -- which have not undergone long-term testing for possible harmful effects -- are of no demonstrated or reasonably expected value to children. 

Children infected by Covid19, are usually asymptomatic. Death from Covid among under twenties is extremely rare, and much less frequent than death from the seasonal flu. 

As for Martin Kulldorff, author of the tweet found "misleading" by Twitter? 

Just a Harvard Medical School professor with 20 years experience of vaccine research, which fact prompted Zero Hedge to comment:
Because, of course, a 22 year-old graduate in Whiteness Studies sitting in Twitter’s HQ in Silicon Valley knows much more about infectious diseases than a Harvard professor of medicine.
But if you don't care about your mind being shaped and twisted for profit by Silicon Valley and in the service of the Money Power, carry on Twittering.

POSTSCRIPT:
This just in:

Twitter temporarily suspended Georgia GOP Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s account on Sunday after she tweeted an Easter message.

What was this damnable Easter tweet:
“He is Risen – Death could not hold him. Rejoice in the resurrection of Jesus Christ.”

How soon before the US follows the path of the defunct Soviet Union by making the expression or religious faith illegal. 

Related: 

Facebook ‘Fact-Checks’ Woman’s Post on Vaccine’s Adverse Reaction One Week Before It Killed Her

Supreme Court Justice Thomas Suggests Facebook, Twitter Could Be Regulated Like Utilities


The Hunter Biden Show: Why Biden's Most "Beautiful Thing" May Be Media Collusion

Saturday, April 3, 2021

How a Canadian Christian Deals With the Covid Gestapo


Here’s part two of the video:

via the Gateway Pundit

Related:

Pfizer's gene therapy vaccine: Now for schoolchildren!

Tucker Carlson: COVID internment camps, coming soon to a country near you

"Brutal" Abuse Of Power: Watch As UK Police Break Up "Unlawful Gathering" Easter Service In London

Brilliant Billionaires, No. 79. Bill Gates's Brilliant Plan to Block the Sun Blocked

An effort to dim the sun to stop global warming has been scrapped by the Swedish Space Agency, who announced that the program, funded by Bill Gates, has ‘divided the scientific community’ and will therefore not be carried out.

Gates should confine his efforts to culling the population with epidemics and driving the survivors insane with crap software.

The solution to problems resulting from human-caused emissions of carbon carbon dioxide is to stop emitting carbon dioxide, a plan now universally agreed. 

As for the carbon dioxide already added to the atmosphere, the ocean will take care of it, and it will do so at the rate of about 12 billion tons a year

How? did you ask?

Photosynthetically. 

Marine algae and cynanobacteria grow by the assimilation of carbon dioxide. When these organisms die they sink to the bottom of the ocean where they form a layer of goop that retains the assimilated carbon indefinitely.

This process of marine assimilation removes about 12 billion tons of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere each year. That's equal to about one quarter of current human-caused, carbon dioxide emissions. 

Thus, if as planned, humanity ends net carbon dioxide emissions by 2050, atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration will begin falling by around 2042. 

Thereafter, atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration will continue to fall over a period of several hundred years until reaching the pre-industrial concentration of around 280 parts per million, or about 70% of the current concentration.

At that point, we will be back to an equilibrium between all emissions of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, both human-caused and natural, and photosynthetic sequestration. Thereafter Bill Gates will be able to rest easy in his grave. 

Related:
Italian Politician Calls For Bill Gates Arrest And Charge Of ‘Crimes Against Humanity’