Saturday, December 19, 2020
The Next Stage in the Electrification of Transportation
Thursday, December 17, 2020
Year Zero: The Year of the Virus
In the relatively short span of the last ten months, societies throughout the world have been transformed beyond recognition. Constitutional rights have been suspended. Protest has been banned. Dissent is being censored. Government officials are issuing edicts restricting the most basic aspects of our lives … where we can go, when we can go there, how long we are allowed to spend there, how many friends we are allowed to meet there, whether and when we can spend time with our families, what we are allowed to say to each other, who we can have sex with, where we have to stand, how we are allowed to eat and drink, etc. The list goes on and on.
The authorities have assumed control of the most intimate aspects of our daily lives. We are being managed like inmates in a prison, told when to eat, sleep, exercise, granted privileges for good behavior, punished for the slightest infractions of an ever-changing set of arbitrary rules, forced to wear identical, demeaning uniforms (albeit only on our faces), and otherwise relentlessly bullied, abused, and humiliated to keep us compliant.
None of which is accidental, or has anything to do with any actual virus, or any other type of public health threat. Yes, before some of you go ballistic, I do believe there is an actual virus, which a number of people have actually died from, or which at least has contributed to their deaths … but there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever of any authentic public health threat that remotely justifies the totalitarian emergency measures we are being subjected to or the damage that is being done to society. Whatever you believe about the so-called “pandemic,” it really is as simple as that. Even if one accepts the official “science,” you do not transform the entire planet into a pathologized-totalitarian nightmare in response to a health threat of this nature.
Read More
Archbishop Carlo Maria ViganĂ²:"The purpose of the Great Reset is the imposition of a health dictatorship aiming at the imposition of liberticidal measures, hidden behind tempting promises of ensuring a universal income and cancelling individual debt..."
Now, roughly six weeks later, one of the most powerful Catholics in the United States, Cardinal Raymond Burke, has kicked it up a notch - slamming "secular forces" who want to "make us slaves to their godless and murderous agenda"
Monday, December 14, 2020
But Trump's Not Beat Yet
A hand recount on Wednesday confirmed that a Michigan county falsely reported on election night a win for Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden.
On Nov. 3, county officials said Biden received over 3,000 more votes than Trump. Two days later, they said Trump won by about 2,500 votes. A third change took place on Nov. 21, with Trump being certified the winner by nearly 4,000 votes.
Officials blamed the skewed results on human error.
LOL. Some seriously error-prone folks in some parts of Michigan.
Republican electors in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada, and New Mexico cast alternative slates of votes for President Donald Trump on Dec. 14, as the certified Democrat electors in the same states cast votes for former Vice President Joe Biden.
... On January 6th in a Congressional session Vice President Mike Pence counts the votes. If he receives votes for Biden and Trump from the same state, the state would likely be cancelled (voided). If the 7 states were deleted for Biden, neither candidate would have the 270 required, and the solution would be to have the Congress vote for President, but with 1 state holding 1 vote each, which has a Republican majority in both houses. In this scenario, Congress would re-elect President Trump.
Who was behind the biggest election steal in American history?
Consider now—away from the mountains of direct evidence of voter fraud—the “math” involved in the 2020 election:
- Shortly after midnight (Eastern time), Trump was leading in all six of the swing states still at issue: Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, and Nevada, and had racked up, apart from those six states, 232 electoral votes to Biden’s 227.
- During the early morning hours of Nov. 4, not one or two, but all six states flipped for Biden.
- The early-morning Nov. 4 “blue-shift” took place only in the six swing states, through a series of “spikes,” almost entirely consisting of mailed ballots (made possible due to radical changes in voting laws amid the CCP virus pandemic) in which Biden received the vast majority of the votes. According to an analysis published through Substack, these spikes include:
- “An update in Michigan listed as 6:31 a.m. Eastern time on Nov. 4, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump”
- “An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42 a.m. Central time on Nov. 4, 2020, which shows “143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump”
- “A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34 a.m. Eastern time on Nov. 4, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump”
- “An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50 a.m. Eastern time on Nov. 4, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump”
- Those four spikes yielded 426,241 Biden votes but only 64,964 Trump votes.
- Somehow Biden did very poorly in all parts of the country except, only and exactly, where it mattered. Out of the 3,000 counties in the United States, 19 so-called “bellwether” counties have had a perfect record, since 1980, of voting for the winner. Trump won 18 of these 19 counties. For example, Vigo County, Indiana, and Valencia County, New Mexico, each has a perfect record of picking the winning candidate since the 1948 election famously gotten wrong by the Chicago Tribune, which ran a cover declaring “Dewey Defeats Truman.” Barack Obama won these two bellwether counties in 2008, yet Trump handily defeated Biden in both and 16 other bellwethers.
- In 2008, Obama garnered 69,498,516 votes, the most ever until Biden topped his record with more than 80 million votes in 2020, yet, Trump this year won the highest share of nonwhite voters of any Republican since 1960: Roughly one-quarter of nonwhite voters cast their ballots for Trump, according to an Edison exit poll.
- Trump improved his 2016 performance (just shy of 63 million votes) by 20 percent in 2020 (more than 74 million votes). No incumbent president in U.S. history has ever improved his original performance that much and lost. For example, Obama garnered 3.5 million fewer votes in 2012, yet won a second term.
In sum: Six swing states were won by Trump on Election Day, and all six shifted to Biden by virtue of early-morning Nov. 4 spikes in mailed-in ballots that overwhelmingly favored Biden; but somehow Biden didn’t win elsewhere in the country; Trump won nearly all (18 of 19) of the historically accurate bellwether counties; Biden, campaigning from his basement, after obvious signs of cognitive decline and the hugely damaging Hunter Biden scandal breaking, running with a vice presidential candidate who had to drop out of the Democratic nomination race while polling at 5 percent, somehow topped Obama, the first black U.S. president, by more than 10 million votes, even as Trump won more of the nonwhite vote than any Republican candidate in the past 60 years.
As Markopolos said of Madoff’s Ponzi scheme, the “math was so compelling,” but no one would listen. The same is true of the 2020 election.
Citizen Free Press: What Happens Next?Once electors have formally recorded their votes for president and vice president, the next major event in the Electoral College process is a joint session of Congress on Jan. 6, during which both chambers will officially count the electoral votes.
Vice President Mike Pence is expected to preside over the Jan. 6 proceedings in his formal role as president of the Senate, a job which also includes announcing the results.
Any objections in Congress to the electoral votes must be submitted in writing and signed by at least one member of the House and one senator. If an objection arises, the two chambers consider the objection separately.
Alabama Republican Rep. Mo Brooks has already said he will challenge the results of the Electoral College count in the House. In the Senate, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin has not ruled out filing a similar objection.
In a Washington Post survey of all 249 congressional Republicans, published Dec. 6, only 27 said they accepted Biden as the legitimately elected president. Another 220 GOP lawmakers gave an unclear answer or did not respond, and two, Brooks and Rep. Paul A. Gosar of Arizona, said they believed Trump was the rightful winner of the election.
Cambridge Scholars Show Disrespect for Speech Directive of PC-Bully Vice Chancellor
Academics at Cambridge won a cheering victory for free speech today when they voted by an overwhelming majority to reject plans from the vice-chancellor to change the rules governing debate at the university. They rejected the university’s proposals to insist that students and staff be ‘respectful’ of opposing views. They decided, instead, that the rules should say students and staff must ‘tolerate’ opposition. The result was as close to conclusive as you can get. Only 162 academics voted in favour of the university’s plan, while 1316 voted in favour of the change. (A further 208 academics wanted neither.) |
Meantime US Social Media companies show neither respect nor tolerance for any who express support for President Donald Trump.
According to the audit as banned by the CIA's Google-owned U.Tube:
“We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified. […] The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity. ... LOL |
Steve Turley: TRUMPISM RISING Like NEVER BEFORE as Election AWAKENS A SLEEPING GIANT!
Saturday, December 12, 2020
The Post-Election-Theft (Dis?)United States of America
Revolver: Statistical Model Indicates Trump Actually Won Majorities in Five Disputed States and 49.68 Pecent of the Vote in a Sixth
National File: HOW TRUMP CAN WIN: SCOTUS, State Supreme Courts, Legislatures, And The 12th Amendment
National File: Sidney Powell Confirms She’s Filed Two Cases Tonight, Is Filing Two More Tomorrow
Zero Hedge: TRUMP FLIES OVER DC 'MILLION MAGA MARCH' AS SUPPORTERS RAGE AGAINST ELECTION RESULTS
National Post: Conrad Black: The Trump haters cackle too soon
Goodbye to Relativity's Bendy Time and the Block Universe?
One is the idea that mass bends time and space, or as one writer put it,
... things that slip out of your hand accelerate toward the floor because Earth's mass warps time.*.
The other implication of Relativity that, as I have written elsewhere, seems ridiculous to me is the existence of a Block Universe: which is to say, a universe where nothing whatever happens, but in which every thing that ever existed or occurred in every moment throughout eternity exists or occurs now and for ever in a four-dimensional space-time continuum, through which for some bizarre reason, our consciousness evolves along the temporal axis creating a false perception of "now".
Happy I am, therefore, to learn that some people at North Carolina State University have come up with a way of solving problems relating to mass, energy, space and time that achieve the same results as Relativity without need to invoke the bizarre notion of the space-time continuum. Here, one of the authors of this new approach provides a non-mathematical outline of the theory and the evidence of its validity:
* George Musser in "Spooky Action at a Distance." Scientific American/Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2015.
Friday, December 11, 2020
The DysToopeian Intolerance of the Tolerant at Cambridge University
Of course there was an air of flagrant hypocrisy about such a speech code, since Mr Toope and his colleagues were hardly respectful to the views of Noah Carl and Jordan Peterson. So one doesn’t have to be a huge cynic or pessimist to fear that a “respect” clause might, therefore, be used in a highly political or one-sided manner by the Toope-ians. “Respect” is easily-demanded but begrudgingly given, especially by those who feel they are occupying the moral high ground; and as one of the academics who objected to the proposals, Arif Ahmed, explained to UnHerd, “respect” is also a very weak basis on which to build free speech.
Must a scientist, or anyone else at Cambridge for that matter, “respect” a flat-earther?
The Usefulness of Covid19
Why is COVID-19 being disproportionately hyped as such a dangerous threat, when the reality of the statistical danger is much less than the intense level of hype?… That is the key question.
The answer is… social changes under the guise of COVID-19 mitigation, are the entry point for the goals and aspirations of the political left on a national and global scale. COVID-19 is a virus, but also a very important political weapon, and we are about to discover exactly what the purpose of the hype is all about. What follows will help understand; and when you encounter the fear it will help to reconcile what people cannot figure out.
Joe Biden is an avatar; a political pawn; a cognitively declining guy who has no idea what is happening around him. The people behind the Biden campaign, those in real control of what this is about, have not hidden their goals and aspirations. These are not stupid people. They are scheming, conniving, ever-planning, ever-manipulating & Machiavellian types within the political system; lusting for power, influence and affluence.
What they are planning to do is weaponize COVID-19 to attain ideological objectives.
Wednesday, December 9, 2020
Covid Vaccine Push-back
Conservative Tree House: The Usefulness of COVID-19 Fear
Brighteon: Canadian pathologist: Covid19 is a hoax
ZH: Russia Warns Citizens Not To Drink Alcohol For Six Weeks After COVID-19 Vaccine
Liberty Beacon: Survey shows 90+% against Gov’s COVID/Vax hoax
Global Research: Suspension of All SARS CoV-2 Vaccine Studies Sought by Former Pfizer Scientist and German parliamentarian
... for the protection of the life and health of the volunteers – Drs. Wodarg and Yeadon argue that vaccine trials should be halted until a study design is developed to address the significant safety concerns expressed by many eminent scientists.One objection these doctors make to ongoing vaccine trials is the dodgy PCR test being used to assess vaccine effectiveness. They say that due to the known inaccuracy of the PCR test, any serious study requires the use of so-called Sanger sequencing. This is the only way to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19. On the basis of the many different PCR tests of highly varying quality currently being used in vaccine trials, neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccine benefit can be determined with the necessary certainty, which is why testing the vaccine on humans is unethical per se.
Sunday, December 6, 2020
Scott Adams: The 2020 US Presidential Election Was Non-Transparent By Force
Bullies kicked out witnesses!
Related:
Friday, December 4, 2020
Trump campaign files to overturn lawsuit in Georgia
Related:
Gateway Pundit: Whistleblower Reveals Chinese Counterfeit Ballot Printing Operations of US Ballots for MS, FL and NC
Will China Win the Race to Mars?
China Poised to Bring Home Moon Samples
With the impending success of a Lunar sample-return mission, it's worth asking: Does China now lead in the space race?
In particular, how much more difficult than a Lunar sample-return mission is a Mars sample-return mission? Not much I would guess. So what's to stop China from bringing home samples of Martian soil, possibly with microbial life included, before anyone else? Nothing except a geriatric US space agency that lacks a sharp focus on the conquest of space, and couple of American billionaires. True, Musk and Bezos are extremely rich, but can they compete with the Government of China in a race that depends on the availability of a large amounts of brilliant engineering talent and unrestrained expenditure.
What's more, being overtaken in the space race by a Third World country that graduates ten times as many engineers as the US is somethings that intelligent Americans must expect, particularly at a time when white privilege, transgenderism, and shuttering the economy to protect an obesity-prone population habituated to the toxic products of the American fast-food and food-processing industries from the consequences of a novel corona (i.e., common cold type) virus have become leading national preoccupations.
Yes, it looks like an end to the technological supremacy of the American Empire and a time for the Communists again to terrorize the world.
Related:
ZH: China's New Supercomputer "10 Billion Times Faster" Than Google's
Thursday, December 3, 2020
The Pfizer Covid19 Vaccine, Does It Work? Is It Safe? Why Should Anyone Want It?
By Kit Knightly
Off Guardian, December 2, 2020: The United Kingdom government has today announced its approval of the first Covid19 vaccine for general use. 800,000 doses are slated to be released for general use by the end of the week, and has already signed a contract for 40 million more doses (to go along with over 300 million doses of as-yet-unreleased vaccines from other companies).
With the newest phase in the Covid19 roll-out set to begin, it’s time we addressed the five biggest questions about this vaccine, its effectiveness, its safety and whether or not we’ll be forced to use it.
1. DOES IT WORK?
Clearly, the company claims it does, and the UK government seems to believe them. The Guardian, in their coverage of the vaccine, claim it has a 95% efficacy rating, but does not provide a source for this or any kind of data at all.
Fortunately, better journalists and researchers are writing for the British Medical Journal, including this piece from Peter Doshi just last week.
The above-cited article by British Medical Journal Associate Editor, Peter Doshi, should be essential reading for anyone wanting to make a reasonable assessment of the utility and value of the current drive by governments to vaccinate everyone. What is particularly important to note is the limited significance of the evidence of vaccine safety and efficacy from the trials conducted so far. For example, as Peter Doshi points out, the trial results: ... (show) a relative risk reduction..., not absolute risk reduction, which appears to be less than 1%. This point is explained by Malcolm Ripley, commenting on above-linked article by Kit Knightly: of 22,000 unvaccinated people, only 162 caught Covid, meaning that 21,838, or 99.26% did not. In the vaccinated group only 8 people caught Covid, meaning that 21,992, or 99.96% did not. So in this trial vaccination reduced the infection rate by less than 1%. In addition, Peter Doshi notes that the trial results ... refer to the trials’ primary endpoint of covid-19 of essentially any severity, and importantly not the vaccine’s ability to save lives, nor the ability to prevent infection, nor the efficacy in important subgroups (e.g. frail elderly). Those still remain unknown. ... reflect a time point relatively soon after vaccination, and we know nothing about vaccine performance at 3, 6, or 12 months, so cannot compare these efficacy numbers against other vaccines like influenza vaccines (which are judged over a season). ... children, adolescents, and immuno-compromised individuals were largely excluded from the trials, so we still lack any data on these important populations. But apparently governments in Britain, Canada, and elsewhere can't wait to start bullying everyone to get vaccinated or suffer penalties, such as the loss of freedom to travel by air, and if stubborn resistance is maintained, most likely by train or bus too. Yes, it's not just the Communist Party of China that now delights in the power to make the life of a citizen virtually impossible if they fail to conform to what ever bullshit. humiliation, or exploitation the government happens for the moment to be intent upon. It's just about anyone with the power. In Britain its Sleazeball Boris and our future king, God help us, Charles the Turd, in America it's Joe the Illegitimate, and here in docile Canada its the Great Resetter himself, Justin-it-for-the-Money Trudeau. |
Wednesday, December 2, 2020
America: A Fake Republic with Fake Elections, A Fake Free Press, and A Fake Right of Free Speech
Of this, the Irish Savant Comments:
The Savant then asks why Trump hired Barr, a man whose Deep State connections were well known. And that raises the big question about Trump: why did he fail to take effective control of the government?Nothing to see here: AG Barr comes up good just when the Deep needed him.
Was he intimidated by the Deep State (remember the Kennedy's), working with the Deep State, or simply unable to get a grip on the job?
And here's one way to understand that remark:
the administrative state takes advantage of their insider positioning to control outside elements that are a risk to their status. They weaponize the principled honor of their target. This is why good people, decent people, do not last in Washington DC.
THAT is how a good man, a very decent man, has his love, honor and willingness to trust, weaponized against him. AG Bill Barr duped POTUS Trump, our president gave him full benefit of the doubt. Listen to that video: “I’ll only say this once”…
Do you remember the warning by Castellanos? Think back to the 2015 instructions from republican insider Alex Castellanos as he described how the RNC could eliminate the disruptive influence of Donald Trump:[…] “The best way to do it is how Brutus killed Caesar. Get real close, snuggle up, and shiv him in the ribs”… (link)