Saturday, December 19, 2020

The Next Stage in the Electrification of Transportation

Nine years ago we predicted that electric vehicles charged wirelessly by induction from coils embedded in blacktop were the future of road transportation.

Apparently, we were some years ahead of our time, although a demonstration of the concept was then being undertaken in South Korea. 

Now some folks in Coventry, England, have decided to give it a whirl too. Right now, total funding for the project is less than half a million quid. But if the Conservative Party really wants to hang onto those Northern, former labor-voting, Tory Parliamentary seats, this is a Northern development project they should back: first, with full electrification of the main streets of the innovative city of Coventry, then with backing for the development of low-cost, induction-powered cars. Such vehicles would need only a small battery — costing hundreds, not thousands of dollars, weighing less than a tank of gas, with a capacity of no more than 5 kWh, to propel the vehicle on suburban streets and other byways with limited traffic which would not be electrified. 

After that, the goal should be to extend the project to adjacent cities and eventually country-wide, with embedded power coils in connecting highways. For this, Britain, as among the world's most densely populated countries, is ideally suited. 

Go for it bigly BoJo, or get trashed in the next election. 

Related: 

Thursday, December 17, 2020

Year Zero: The Year of the Virus

By C.J. Hopkins:

2020 was GloboCap Year Zero. The year when the global capitalist ruling classes did away with the illusion of democracy and reminded everyone who is actually in charge, and exactly what happens when anyone challenges them.

In the relatively short span of the last ten months, societies throughout the world have been transformed beyond recognition. Constitutional rights have been suspended. Protest has been banned. Dissent is being censored. Government officials are issuing edicts restricting the most basic aspects of our lives … where we can go, when we can go there, how long we are allowed to spend there, how many friends we are allowed to meet there, whether and when we can spend time with our families, what we are allowed to say to each other, who we can have sex with, where we have to stand, how we are allowed to eat and drink, etc. The list goes on and on.

The authorities have assumed control of the most intimate aspects of our daily lives. We are being managed like inmates in a prison, told when to eat, sleep, exercise, granted privileges for good behavior, punished for the slightest infractions of an ever-changing set of arbitrary rules, forced to wear identical, demeaning uniforms (albeit only on our faces), and otherwise relentlessly bullied, abused, and humiliated to keep us compliant.

None of which is accidental, or has anything to do with any actual virus, or any other type of public health threat. Yes, before some of you go ballistic, I do believe there is an actual virus, which a number of people have actually died from, or which at least has contributed to their deaths … but there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever of any authentic public health threat that remotely justifies the totalitarian emergency measures we are being subjected to or the damage that is being done to society. Whatever you believe about the so-called “pandemic,” it really is as simple as that. Even if one accepts the official “science,” you do not transform the entire planet into a pathologized-totalitarian nightmare in response to a health threat of this nature.
Read More

Related: 




Archbishop Carlo Maria ViganĂ²:"The purpose of the Great Reset is the imposition of a health dictatorship aiming at the imposition of liberticidal measures, hidden behind tempting promises of ensuring a universal income and cancelling individual debt..." 

Now, roughly six weeks later, one of the most powerful Catholics in the United States, Cardinal Raymond Burke, has kicked it up a notch - slamming "secular forces" who want to "make us slaves to their godless and murderous agenda"

Monday, December 14, 2020

But Trump's Not Beat Yet


Lin Wood Confirms Chief Justice John Roberts Was On Epstein’s Pedo Island, Has Documentation


Tech expert explains how to audit the vote very quickly:


Pepe Escobar: When Deplorables Become Ungovernables
Jim Jordan: On Contesting the Election


***Patrick Byrne***Dissecting The Electronic Steal ***


From Rense.com, for what it's worth:

The Epoch Times: Recount Confirms Trump Won Michigan County That Reported Biden Win on Election Night

A hand recount on Wednesday confirmed that a Michigan county falsely reported on election night a win for Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden.

On Nov. 3, county officials said Biden received over 3,000 more votes than Trump. Two days later, they said Trump won by about 2,500 votes. A third change took place on Nov. 21, with Trump being certified the winner by nearly 4,000 votes.

Officials blamed the skewed results on human error.

 LOL. Some seriously error-prone folks in some parts of Michigan.



Zero Hedge: 
PARALLEL BALLOTS CAST IN 7 STATES: ELECTION NOT OVER
Republican electors in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada, and New Mexico cast alternative slates of votes for President Donald Trump on Dec. 14, as the certified Democrat electors in the same states cast votes for former Vice President Joe Biden.

... On January 6th in a Congressional session Vice President Mike Pence counts the votes. If he receives votes for Biden and Trump from the same state, the state would likely be cancelled (voided). If the 7 states were deleted for Biden, neither candidate would have the 270 required, and the solution would be to have the Congress vote for President, but with 1 state holding 1 vote each, which has a Republican majority in both houses. In this scenario, Congress would re-elect President Trump.
Hannity.com:
In Georgia, Unsigned Absentee Ballots, Shown on Video adds to the Stench of Election Corruption

IWB: 
JOE BIDEN 2007: “How are you gonna keep it from us being able to be in a position where you can manipulate the machines

Unz Review:
Chandra Chisala: Electoral Fraud in Black and White
Who was behind the biggest election steal in American history?

Gateway Pundit:
Michigan’s Matt Sealy Explains How President Trump Has SEVERAL Paths To Victory…”Never count Donald Trump out!”

Epoch Times: 
Michigan Lawyer: Trump Should Take Action After Voting Machine Audit in Antrim County

Steve Turley: 
Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Nevada Electors VOTE FOR TRUMP

Horowitz


Related:

The Hill: An ominous warning: Attorney Alan Dershowitz said the Supreme Court turning down Texas’s election lawsuit sent a message that President Trump and his allies "can’t count on the judiciary" to help overturn the results of the election.

And from Natural News: Badges of Fraud in 2020 Election

Consider now—away from the mountains of direct evidence of voter fraud—the “math” involved in the 2020 election:

  • Shortly after midnight (Eastern time), Trump was leading in all six of the swing states still at issue: Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, and Nevada, and had racked up, apart from those six states, 232 electoral votes to Biden’s 227.
  • During the early morning hours of Nov. 4, not one or two, but all six states flipped for Biden.
  • The early-morning Nov. 4 “blue-shift” took place only in the six swing states, through a series of “spikes,” almost entirely consisting of mailed ballots (made possible due to radical changes in voting laws amid the CCP virus pandemic) in which Biden received the vast majority of the votes. According to an analysis published through Substack, these spikes include:
    • “An update in Michigan listed as 6:31 a.m. Eastern time on Nov. 4, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump”
    • “An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42 a.m. Central time on Nov. 4, 2020, which shows “143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump”
    • “A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34 a.m. Eastern time on Nov. 4, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump”
    • “An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50 a.m. Eastern time on Nov. 4, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump”
  • Those four spikes yielded 426,241 Biden votes but only 64,964 Trump votes.
  • Somehow Biden did very poorly in all parts of the country except, only and exactly, where it mattered. Out of the 3,000 counties in the United States, 19 so-called “bellwether” counties have had a perfect record, since 1980, of voting for the winner. Trump won 18 of these 19 counties. For example, Vigo County, Indiana, and Valencia County, New Mexico, each has a perfect record of picking the winning candidate since the 1948 election famously gotten wrong by the Chicago Tribune, which ran a cover declaring “Dewey Defeats Truman.” Barack Obama won these two bellwether counties in 2008, yet Trump handily defeated Biden in both and 16 other bellwethers.
  • In 2008, Obama garnered 69,498,516 votes, the most ever until Biden topped his record with more than 80 million votes in 2020, yet, Trump this year won the highest share of nonwhite voters of any Republican since 1960: Roughly one-quarter of nonwhite voters cast their ballots for Trump, according to an Edison exit poll.
  • Trump improved his 2016 performance (just shy of 63 million votes) by 20 percent in 2020 (more than 74 million votes). No incumbent president in U.S. history has ever improved his original performance that much and lost. For example, Obama garnered 3.5 million fewer votes in 2012, yet won a second term.

In sum: Six swing states were won by Trump on Election Day, and all six shifted to Biden by virtue of early-morning Nov. 4 spikes in mailed-in ballots that overwhelmingly favored Biden; but somehow Biden didn’t win elsewhere in the country; Trump won nearly all (18 of 19) of the historically accurate bellwether counties; Biden, campaigning from his basement, after obvious signs of cognitive decline and the hugely damaging Hunter Biden scandal breaking, running with a vice presidential candidate who had to drop out of the Democratic nomination race while polling at 5 percent, somehow topped Obama, the first black U.S. president, by more than 10 million votes, even as Trump won more of the nonwhite vote than any Republican candidate in the past 60 years.

As Markopolos said of Madoff’s Ponzi scheme, the “math was so compelling,” but no one would listen. The same is true of the 2020 election.

Read more

Citizen Free Press: What Happens Next?

Once electors have formally recorded their votes for president and vice president, the next major event in the Electoral College process is a joint session of Congress on Jan. 6, during which both chambers will officially count the electoral votes.

Vice President Mike Pence is expected to preside over the Jan. 6 proceedings in his formal role as president of the Senate, a job which also includes announcing the results.

Any objections in Congress to the electoral votes must be submitted in writing and signed by at least one member of the House and one senator. If an objection arises, the two chambers consider the objection separately.

Alabama Republican Rep. Mo Brooks has already said he will challenge the results of the Electoral College count in the House. In the Senate, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin has not ruled out filing a similar objection.

In a Washington Post survey of all 249 congressional Republicans, published Dec. 6, only 27 said they accepted Biden as the legitimately elected president. Another 220 GOP lawmakers gave an unclear answer or did not respond, and two, Brooks and Rep. Paul A. Gosar of Arizona, said they believed Trump was the rightful winner of the election.

Cambridge Scholars Show Disrespect for Speech Directive of PC-Bully Vice Chancellor

 From the Spectator:

Academics at Cambridge won a cheering victory for free speech today when they voted by an overwhelming majority to reject plans from the vice-chancellor to change the rules governing debate at the university.

They rejected the university’s proposals to insist that students and staff be ‘respectful’ of opposing views. They decided, instead, that the rules should say students and staff must ‘tolerate’ opposition. The result was as close to conclusive as you can get. Only 162 academics voted in favour of the university’s plan, while 1316 voted in favour of the change. (A further 208 academics wanted neither.)

How pathetic is it that the scholars at a leading European university found it necessary to pass a resolution in favor of free speech? 

What those folks at Cambridge should do now is pass a resolution demanding the termination without compensation of the jack-ass Vice-Chancellor who sought to bind them in the toils of Political Correctness.

Meantime US Social Media companies show neither respect nor tolerance for any who express support for President Donald Trump.

and

This is the future of public debate. The corporate and public media will lay out the narrative and questioning it publicly will be made impossible. But you'll still be allowed to spout conspiracy theories from a soapbox, the traditional liberty of the mentally unhinged. 

Related: 

Dominion Voting-Machine Software Designed to Influence Election Results: Forensics Report

Michigan Judge Orders Release of Damning Forensics Report of Dominion Vote Tabulation System, Full Forensics Report

According to the audit as banned by the CIA's Google-owned U.Tube:

“We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.

The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud.

Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.

[…] The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity. ...

LOL

Steve Turley: TRUMPISM RISING Like NEVER BEFORE as Election AWAKENS A SLEEPING GIANT!

Saturday, December 12, 2020

The Post-Election-Theft (Dis?)United States of America


Revolver: Statistical Model Indicates Trump Actually Won Majorities in Five Disputed States and 49.68 Pecent of the Vote in a Sixth

Unherd: Don’t dismiss the Trump brigade

SkyNews.com.au: Just Leaked: List of 1.95 million Chinese Communist Party members, many embedded in Western corporations and Government Agencies

Daily Mail: Leaked files expose mass infiltration of UK firms by Chinese Communist Party including AstraZeneca, Rolls Royce, HSBC and Jaguar Land Rover

National File: HOW TRUMP CAN WIN: SCOTUS, State Supreme Courts, Legislatures, And The 12th Amendment

National File: Sidney Powell Confirms She’s Filed Two Cases Tonight, Is Filing Two More Tomorrow

Zero Hedge: TRUMP FLIES OVER DC 'MILLION MAGA MARCH' AS SUPPORTERS RAGE AGAINST ELECTION RESULTS

National Post: Conrad Black: The Trump haters cackle too soon

...The Biden administration, if it takes office at all, will be a clangorous “Gong Show.” Either Trump, or a Republican approved by him and continuing his policies, will be the Republican candidate in four years. Then we will have the final round in this battle for the political soul of America. What we are hearing now is the Trump-hating goose cackling too loudly and too soon.

Goodbye to Relativity's Bendy Time and the Block Universe?

No qualified person, so far as I am aware, questions the validity of the Theory of Relativity as a means of solving questions relating to mass, time, and motion. As a non-qualified person I therefore I have no questions about the practical validity of the theory either. However, as a way of visualizing the nature of space and time the theory has always seemed to me to be nonsense. In particular, two implications of Relativity Theory seem absurd.

One is the idea that mass bends time and space, or as one writer put it,
... things that slip out of your hand accelerate toward the floor because Earth's mass warps time.*. 
Really? Bendy time? As I have questioned elsewhere, can that mean anything at all? I rather doubt it.

The other implication of Relativity that, as I have written elsewhere, seems ridiculous to me is the existence of a Block Universe: which is to say, a universe where nothing whatever happens, but in which every thing that ever existed or occurred in every moment throughout eternity exists or occurs now and for ever in a four-dimensional space-time continuum, through which for some bizarre reason, our consciousness evolves along the temporal axis creating a false perception of "now".

Happy I am, therefore, to learn that some people at North Carolina State University have come up with a way of solving problems relating to mass, energy, space and time that achieve the same results as Relativity without need to invoke the bizarre notion of the space-time continuum. Here, one of the authors of this new approach provides a non-mathematical outline of the theory and the evidence of its validity: 

Fragments of energy – not waves or particles – may be the fundamental building blocks of the universe:

By Larry M. Silverberg

Matter is what makes up the universe, but what makes up matter? This question has long been tricky for those who think about it – especially for the physicists. Reflecting recent trends in physics, my colleague Jeffrey Eischen and I have described an updated way to think about matter. We propose that matter is not made of particles or waves, as was long thought, but – more fundamentally – that matter is made of fragments of energy.


————
* George Musser in "Spooky Action at a Distance." Scientific American/Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, 2015.

Friday, December 11, 2020

The DysToopeian Intolerance of the Tolerant at Cambridge University

By Douglas Murray

On Wednesday, there seemed to be some good news in the free speech wars, when the governing body of Cambridge University rejected a new set of speech codes. The rules, proposed by the Canadian lawyer turned University Vice-Chancellor, Stephen Toope, and others, would have mandated that academics and students at the university should be “respectful” of the views of others.

Of course there was an air of flagrant hypocrisy about such a speech code, since Mr Toope and his colleagues were hardly respectful to the views of Noah Carl and Jordan Peterson. So one doesn’t have to be a huge cynic or pessimist to fear that a “respect” clause might, therefore, be used in a highly political or one-sided manner by the Toope-ians. “Respect” is easily-demanded but begrudgingly given, especially by those who feel they are occupying the moral high ground; and as one of the academics who objected to the proposals, Arif Ahmed, explained to UnHerd, “respect” is also a very weak basis on which to build free speech.

Must a scientist, or anyone else at Cambridge for that matter, “respect” a flat-earther?


Related:
Dr. Arif Ahmed: "Don't force me to respect your views"

The Usefulness of Covid19

 Why is COVID-19 being disproportionately hyped as such a dangerous threat, when the reality of the statistical danger is much less than the intense level of hype?… That is the key question.

The answer is… social changes under the guise of COVID-19 mitigation, are the entry point for the goals and aspirations of the political left on a national and global scale. COVID-19 is a virus, but also a very important political weapon, and we are about to discover exactly what the purpose of the hype is all about. What follows will help understand; and when you encounter the fear it will help to reconcile what people cannot figure out.

Joe Biden is an avatar; a political pawn; a cognitively declining guy who has no idea what is happening around him. The people behind the Biden campaign, those in real control of what this is about, have not hidden their goals and aspirations. These are not stupid people. They are scheming, conniving, ever-planning, ever-manipulating & Machiavellian types within the political system; lusting for power, influence and affluence.

What they are planning to do is weaponize COVID-19 to attain ideological objectives.

Read more


Wednesday, December 9, 2020

Covid Vaccine Push-back

Conservative Tree House: The Usefulness of COVID-19 Fear

Brighteon: Canadian pathologist: Covid19 is a hoax

ZH: Russia Warns Citizens Not To Drink Alcohol For Six Weeks After COVID-19 Vaccine

Liberty Beacon: Survey shows 90+% against Gov’s COVID/Vax hoax

Global Research: Suspension of All SARS CoV-2 Vaccine Studies Sought by Former Pfizer Scientist and German parliamentarian 

... for the protection of the life and health of the volunteers – Drs. Wodarg and Yeadon argue that vaccine trials should be halted until a study design is developed to address the significant safety concerns expressed by many eminent scientists.

One objection these doctors make to ongoing vaccine trials is the dodgy PCR test being used to assess vaccine effectiveness. They say that due to the known inaccuracy of the PCR test, any serious study requires the use of so-called Sanger sequencing. This is the only way to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19. On the basis of the many different PCR tests of highly varying quality currently being used in vaccine trials, neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccine benefit can be determined with the necessary certainty, which is why testing the vaccine on humans is unethical per se.

Daily Mail: Danish Study: Masks 'DON'T stop you getting Covid'

Off Guardian: Naomi Klein: Gatekeeper Extraordinaire

Daily Mail: Warning over UK vaccine rollout as two NHS staff given jab suffer 'anaphylactoid reaction'

Gateway Pundit: Four Volunteers Who Took Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Developed Bell’s Palsy – FDA Denies the Temporary Facial Paralysis Caused by the Shot

ZH: UK Warns People With "Severe Allergies" Shouldn't Take COVID Vaccine

Lew Rockwell: Doctors and Scientists Who Won't Be Taking the Covid19 Vaccine — Banned by U-Tube, obviously 

Sunday, December 6, 2020

Scott Adams: The 2020 US Presidential Election Was Non-Transparent By Force

 Bullies kicked out witnesses! 


Related:


So much for that then. Game over. US Presidential elections exist to be stolen and the Dems stole that one fair and square for reasons that Joe Biden acknowledged













The recount presumably included the ballots that appeared in suitcases from under the table after the poll watchers had been expelled, so the recount only confirms that there were more ballots marked for Biden than for Trump. What the recount did not do is dispel the evidence of fake ballots being injected into the count. But this small but vital problem apparently does not concern America's corporate media.  




 

Epoch Times: Trump Proposes ‘Landmark Election Reform’ and Overhaul of Election Security Systems

ERBN: Confirmed: FAKE Ballots for 2020 US Presidential Election Were Printed in Guangdong, China

Friday, December 4, 2020

Trump campaign files to overturn lawsuit in Georgia



Related: 
Strategic Culture Foundation: The U.S. Election Is Not Over

Will China Win the Race to Mars?

China Poised to Bring Home Moon Samples

With the impending success of a Lunar sample-return mission, it's worth asking: Does China now lead in the space race? 

In particular, how much more difficult than a Lunar sample-return mission is a Mars sample-return mission? Not much I would guess. So what's to stop China from bringing home samples of Martian soil, possibly with microbial life included, before anyone else? Nothing except a geriatric US space agency that lacks a sharp focus on the conquest of space, and couple of American billionaires. True, Musk and Bezos are extremely rich, but can they compete with the Government of China in a race that depends on the availability of a large amounts of brilliant engineering talent and unrestrained expenditure. 

What's more, being overtaken in the space race by a Third World country that graduates ten times as many engineers as the US is somethings that intelligent Americans must expect, particularly at a time when white privilege, transgenderism, and shuttering the economy to protect an obesity-prone population habituated to the toxic products of the American fast-food and food-processing industries from the consequences of a novel corona (i.e., common cold type) virus have become leading national preoccupations. 

Yes, it looks like an end to the technological supremacy of the American Empire and a time for the Communists again to terrorize the world. 

Related: 

ZH: China's New Supercomputer "10 Billion Times Faster" Than Google's

Thursday, December 3, 2020

The Pfizer Covid19 Vaccine, Does It Work? Is It Safe? Why Should Anyone Want It?

By Kit Knightly

Off Guardian, December 2, 2020: The United Kingdom government has today announced its approval of the first Covid19 vaccine for general use. 800,000 doses are slated to be released for general use by the end of the week, and has already signed a contract for 40 million more doses (to go along with over 300 million doses of as-yet-unreleased vaccines from other companies).

With the newest phase in the Covid19 roll-out set to begin, it’s time we addressed the five biggest questions about this vaccine, its effectiveness, its safety and whether or not we’ll be forced to use it.

1. DOES IT WORK?

Clearly, the company claims it does, and the UK government seems to believe them. The Guardian, in their coverage of the vaccine, claim it has a 95% efficacy rating, but does not provide a source for this or any kind of data at all.

Fortunately, better journalists and researchers are writing for the British Medical Journal, including this piece from Peter Doshi just last week.

Read More

The above-cited article by British Medical Journal Associate Editor, Peter Doshi, should be essential reading for anyone wanting to make a reasonable assessment of the utility and value of the current drive by governments to vaccinate everyone. What is particularly important to note is the limited significance of the evidence of vaccine safety and efficacy from the trials conducted so far.

For example, as

Peter Doshi points out, the trial results:

... (show) a relative risk reduction..., not absolute risk reduction, which appears to be less than 1%.

This point is explained by Malcolm Ripley, commenting on above-linked article by Kit Knightly:

of 22,000 unvaccinated people, only 162 caught Covid, meaning that 21,838, or 99.26% did not. In the vaccinated group only 8 people caught Covid, meaning that 21,992, or 99.96% did not. So in this trial vaccination reduced the infection rate by less than 1%. In addition, Peter Doshi notes that the trial results

... refer to the trials’ primary endpoint of covid-19 of essentially any severity, and importantly not the vaccine’s ability to save lives, nor the ability to prevent infection, nor the efficacy in important subgroups (e.g. frail elderly). Those still remain unknown.

... reflect a time point relatively soon after vaccination, and we know nothing about vaccine performance at 3, 6, or 12 months, so cannot compare these efficacy numbers against other vaccines like influenza vaccines (which are judged over a season).

... children, adolescents, and immuno-compromised individuals were largely excluded from the trials, so we still lack any data on these important populations.

But apparently governments in Britain, Canada, and elsewhere can't wait to start bullying everyone to get vaccinated or suffer penalties, such as the loss of freedom to travel by air, and if stubborn resistance is maintained, most likely by train or bus too.

Yes, it's not just the Communist Party of China that now delights in the power to make the life of a citizen virtually impossible if they fail to conform to what ever bullshit. humiliation, or exploitation the government happens for the moment to be intent upon. It's just about anyone with the power. In Britain its Sleazeball Boris and our future king, God help us, Charles the Turd, in America it's Joe the Illegitimate, and here in docile Canada its the Great Resetter himself, Justin-it-for-the-Money Trudeau.

Related: 

Wednesday, December 2, 2020

America: A Fake Republic with Fake Elections, A Fake Free Press, and A Fake Right of Free Speech

Just when President Trump most urgently needed the support of his cabinet, Attorney General William Barr delivered a punch in the guts, stating that there is no evidence of widespread fraud that could have changed the result of last month's presidential election.

Of this, the Irish Savant Comments:

Nothing to see here: AG Barr comes up good just when the Deep needed him.

The Savant then asks why Trump hired Barr, a man whose Deep State connections were well known. And that raises the big question about Trump: why did he fail to take effective control of the government? 

Was he intimidated by the Deep State (remember the Kennedy's), working with the Deep State, or simply unable to get a grip on the job?

Remarkably, speaking of Bill Barr, Trump said:

And here's one way to understand that remark:

the administrative state takes advantage of their insider positioning to control outside elements that are a risk to their status. They weaponize the principled honor of their target. This is why good people, decent people, do not last in Washington DC.

THAT is how a good man, a very decent man, has his love, honor and willingness to trust, weaponized against him. AG Bill Barr duped POTUS Trump, our president gave him full benefit of the doubt. Listen to that video: “I’ll only say this once”…

Do you remember the warning by Castellanos? Think back to the 2015 instructions from republican insider Alex Castellanos as he described how the RNC could eliminate the disruptive influence of Donald Trump:

[…] “The best way to do it is how Brutus killed Caesar. Get real close, snuggle up, and shiv him in the ribs”… (link)

Then there's the Epstein angle. Trump knew Epstein well, a "terrific guy" as he once described,  the reportedly late or possibly not late, spy, blackmailer, and sex maniac. Apparently Bill Barr's father knew Epstein well too. Well enough to hire him, anyhow. Did Epstein know Trump too well for Trump's own good?

Related: