Showing posts with label intolerance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label intolerance. Show all posts

Monday, February 14, 2022

Truckers Versus Canada's Fascist State

 By Mary Anastasia O'Grady

Wall Street Journal, February 13, 2022: When Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau declared last month that truckers protesting his Covid-19 vaccine mandates in Ottawa hold “unacceptable views,” he accentuated the real reason the drivers decided they had no choice but to go to the streets. Their government, headed by the Liberal Party, has become decidedly illiberal.

The truckers, engaged largely in peaceful acts of civil disobedience, call themselves the Freedom Convoy. But they aren’t an organized group with a leader. Some set out from western Canada last month in opposition to a vaccine mandate. Along the way others joined the original pack in person, in spirit—and even in solidarity. On Feb. 8, the Canadian Broadcasting Corp. reported “the tow trucks operators on contract to the City of Ottawa [were] taking a hard pass on requests to haul vehicles out of protest areas, according to the city’s top public servant.”

Note that Mr. Trudeau didn’t say that blocking the Ambassador Bridge connecting Detroit and Windsor, Ontario, is unacceptable. Rather, he declared truckers’ ideals beyond the pale.

Intolerance is ugly. But for Mr. Trudeau, who proudly backs Black Lives Matter, it’s OK in this case because it’s the politically correct variety: He’s denouncing the opinions of a bunch of yahoos.

Coming from a prime minister sitting atop a powerful administrative state, this goes a long way in explaining what has gone from a protest to a movement.

Polls suggest that most Canadians don’t support disturbing the peace or blocking international crossings. Yet a majority are sympathetic to the truckers’ mission, which is to end Covid-19 restrictions and mandates that they believe go beyond the proper power of the state.

A moving speech in November by former Royal Canadian Mounted Police Corporal Daniel Bulford, once assigned to Mr. Trudeau’s personal security detail, described the conflict between government Covid-19 orders and the oath Mounties take to defend Canadian liberty.

Mr. Trudeau likes to invoke “science.” Yet the virulence of the virus is waning, natural immunity is up, and by the prime minister’s own estimates some 90% of Canadian truck drivers are vaccinated. If there were ever any reasons for extraordinary government measures to protect public health, they too have faded.

On Tuesday Alberta Premier Jason Kenney lifted his province’s proof-of-vaccination requirements. “Now is the time to begin learning to live with Covid,” he said. “These restrictions have led to terrible division.” Saskatchewan did the same earlier last week, and Ontario has said it would move in a similar direction.

Meantime, Mr. Trudeau is claiming police powers as if the nation were in the grip of catastrophe. No wonder already simmering resentments about federal overreach have boiled over.

Canada is advertised as a modern democracy that respects pluralism. This implies differences of opinion peacefully coexisting on a variety of subjects from assessing health risks to raising and educating children to political philosophy. Individuals, even when in the minority, retain rights to free speech and assembly.

Yet in practice Canadians who oppose big government increasingly find they are living under a woke, progressive majoritarianism that believes it owns the truth. Dissidents are hounded out of the public square and even the prime minister cancels contrarians without batting an eye.

The reach of Canada’s administrative state rivals that of its southern neighbor. Ottawa and the provinces have their own versions of health departments and agencies staffed with “experts” who wield enormous power yet don’t answer to the electorate. On both sides of the border, chief medical authorities are referred to as “top doctors,” but that’s a misnomer. They’re more likely to be top bureaucrats, people like Anthony Fauci, who has been at the helm of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases since 1984.

In theory, Canada’s 1982 Charter of Rights and Freedoms—which is part of the constitution—ought to protect civil rights. But the Canadian judiciary has been drifting ideologically left for decades. Courts today interpret the constitution through the lens of social justice rather than individual liberty. The state enjoys wide powers to crush dissent.

The government claims its Covid-19 restrictions do not limit freedom, but that’s a phony argument. As Bruce Pardy, the executive director of Rights Probe, a Toronto-based think tank, explained in the Financial Post Nov. 3, “By maintaining the pretense that people have a real choice between being vaccinated or being stripped of their employment, schooling, social interactions and travels, governments seek to coerce and manipulate without triggering charter protections.”

Mr. Pardy told me by telephone last week that he believes “the instincts of small-c conservatives are to protect institutions. But they don’t realize that those institutions are gone. They still have faith in a system of governance already compromised.”

The truckers know better.

Related:

Freedom Convoy truckers remain defiant in the face of Justin Trudeau's draconian new measures

Toronto Sun: Trudeau has gone too far (Wow, They Only Just Noticed!)

Canada shows how the end of Covid is going to bring a long-overdue reckoning for the so-called liberal leaders who are still trying to use it to oppress their people and steal their freedoms "Joe Biden, Justin Trudeau, Emmanuel Macron, Jacinda Ardern in particular have been exposed as the real Covid extremists, tearing their societies apart with divisive mandates and draconian restrictions no longer backed up by scientific evidence.... At the forefront of this hypocrisy are Canada's Trudeau and New Zealand's Ardern, Prime Ministers whose 'Be Kind' mantras are being exposed as meaningless drivel. It's this pair of lefties who are the nasty ones, doing all they can to drive a wedge through their once harmonious and quiet societies ..."

59% of U.S. Voters Support Canadian Truckers in ‘Freedom Convoy’ Protest

The Mandates Are Leaving Europe. Is Freedom Winning?  Naah! Freedom's a Far-Right Concept, So Says Trudeau's Broadcasting Mouthpiece the CBC

Freedom Convoy Organizers Say They Notified Police After Being Told "Nefarious Elements" Plan To Discredit Protest

Chrystia Freeland Labels Truckers Terrorists When will the true liberals in the Liberal Party of Canada, supposing there are any, show some backbone and resist the Nazification of their party. 


Johnathan Turley: Justin Trudeau Threatens Canada's Survival as a Free Society

Friday, December 11, 2020

The DysToopeian Intolerance of the Tolerant at Cambridge University

By Douglas Murray

On Wednesday, there seemed to be some good news in the free speech wars, when the governing body of Cambridge University rejected a new set of speech codes. The rules, proposed by the Canadian lawyer turned University Vice-Chancellor, Stephen Toope, and others, would have mandated that academics and students at the university should be “respectful” of the views of others.

Of course there was an air of flagrant hypocrisy about such a speech code, since Mr Toope and his colleagues were hardly respectful to the views of Noah Carl and Jordan Peterson. So one doesn’t have to be a huge cynic or pessimist to fear that a “respect” clause might, therefore, be used in a highly political or one-sided manner by the Toope-ians. “Respect” is easily-demanded but begrudgingly given, especially by those who feel they are occupying the moral high ground; and as one of the academics who objected to the proposals, Arif Ahmed, explained to UnHerd, “respect” is also a very weak basis on which to build free speech.

Must a scientist, or anyone else at Cambridge for that matter, “respect” a flat-earther?


Related:
Dr. Arif Ahmed: "Don't force me to respect your views"

Wednesday, August 21, 2019

Intolerant Liberals

Those calling themselves liberals, used to say: "the answer to intolerance is intolerance."

 Today, those claiming to be liberals are, for the most part, not liberals at all, but crackpot PC totalitarians with no tolerance for anyone but their own intolerant kind. Toward such so-called liberals, the only reasonable attitude is intolerance.


But it should be understood that, for the most part, today's PC totalitarian liberals are merely the dupes of the globalist elite, their role to serve as cannon fodder in the cultural war to destroy the Western nations and the culture of Christendom.

It is thus for the globalist elite and their front men and women, the likes of Zucks, Bryn and Page, Hillary Clinton, together with Prince Harry and the rest of the offset-buying, jet-set crowd, that the greatest intolerance is due.

For the gullible masses, in particular the brainwashed products of the Western "educational" system, intolerance must be tempered with compassion together with aid in overcoming the grotesque political programming that is now a central feature of state-directed education, especially at the post-secondary level.

Related:
Piers Morgan on the intolerance of today's so-called liberals:


Tuesday, September 27, 2016

PC Language Control and the Rise of the Third Reich


Acknowledgments to What Really Happened.

Note:
Hitler's Brown Shirt enforcers of Nazi ideology, were, so this commentator argues, the counterpart of today's enforcers of political correctness, directing hate and violence at those who fail to conform to the state orthodoxy.

The Brown Shirts were financed with aid from the Union Bank Corporation of the United States. Prescott Bush, father and grandfather of Presidents George H. W. and George W. Bush, respectively, was a director of the Union Bank Corp. The bank was shut down during the war under the US Trading With the Enemy Act.