Saturday, October 30, 2021

Covidiocy, or the Drive to jab Everyone

 British Medical Journal: 

Vaccinating people who have had covid-19: why doesn’t natural immunity count in the US?

By Jennifer Block

The US CDC estimates that SARS-CoV-2 has infected more than 100 million Americans, and evidence is mounting that natural immunity is at least as protective as vaccination. Yet public health leadership says everyone needs the vaccine. Jennifer Block investigates

When the vaccine rollout began in mid-December 2020, more than one quarter of Americans—91 million—had been infected with SARS-CoV-2, according to a US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimate.1 As of this May, that proportion had risen to more than a third of the population, including 44% of adults aged 18-59 (table 1).
Table 1 

Estimated total infections in the United States between February 2020 and May 2021*

Age group (years)No of infections (millions) (95% uncertainty interval)Population in 2019 (millions)% previously infected (95% uncertainty interval)
0-1726.8 (22 to 33.1)7337 (30 to 45)
18-4960.5 (50.4 to 73.2)13844% (36 to 53)
50-6420.4 (17.0 to 24.6)6332% (27 to 39)
65+12.3 (9.9 to 15.5)5423% (18 to 29)
All ages120.3 (103.3 to 140.9)32837% (31 to 43)

  • * Sources: CDC (estimated infections) and US Census (2019 estimated population).

The substantial number of infections, coupled with the increasing scientific evidence that natural immunity was durable, led some medical observers to ask why natural immunity didn’t seem to be factored into decisions about prioritising vaccination.234

Read more

Related:

Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections
"Conclusions This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity. ..."
Posted by at No comments:

Friday, October 29, 2021

Lancet Study: Vaccination Doesn't Prevent Covid Infection or Transmission: So What, Again, Is the Point of Vaccine Passports?

A report in the current issue of the Lancet demonstrates that those vaccinated against the Covid-19 virus (SARS-COV2) are not only highly susceptible to infection, but  carry as high a viral load as the unvaccinated and are likely to spread the virus to other members of their household. Moreover, vaccinated individuals are only marginally less susceptible to infection within the household than unvaccinated individuals.

The study did not address the question of susceptibility to transmission of those with immunity from a past Covid-19 infection, which is understandable since to do so would have negative implications for the drive for universal vaccination. As it is, the billion or so Covid recovereds World-wide represent a huge target that the vax vendors will make every effort to see jabbed. This they will do regardless of whether the benefit exceeds the cost, either financial or as measured by adverse events including the possibility of many thousands of vaccine-caused deaths. 

Related:

Meg and Harry gonna end the pandemic all by themselves

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

US Catholic Archbishop Condemns Covid jab: Warns Globalists want ‘billions of chronically ill people’

 Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò: "I realize that it may be extremely unpopular to take a position against the so-called vaccines, but as Shepherds of the flock of the Lord we have the duty to denounce the horrible crime that is being carried out, whose goal is to create billions of chronically ill people and to exterminate millions and millions of people, based on the infernal ideology of the “Great Reset” formulated by the President of the World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab, and endorsed by institutions and organizations around the world.[29]

The silence of so many cardinals and bishops, along with the inconceivable promotion of the vaccination campaign by the Holy See, represents a form of unprecedented complicity that cannot continue any longer. It is necessary to denounce this scandal, this crime against humanity, this satanic action against God.

With every passing day, thousands of people are dying or are being affected in their health by the illusion that the so-called vaccines guarantee a solution to the pandemic emergency. The Catholic Church has the duty before God and all of humanity to denounce this tremendous and horrible crime with the utmost firmness, giving clear directions and taking a stand against those who, in the name of a pseudo-science subservient to the interests of the pharmaceutical companies and the globalist elite, have only intentions of death. How Joe Biden, who also defines himself as “Catholic,” could impose vaccination on 28 million children aged 5 to 11,[30] is absolutely inconceivable, if only for the fact that there is practically zero risk of them developing the SARS-CoV-2 disease. The Holy See and the Bishops’ Conferences have the duty to express a firm condemnation in this regard, and also in relation to the very serious side effects that can result for children who are inoculated with the experimental gene serum.[31]

Full text

Related:


Pfizer adds ingredient used to stabilize heart attack victims in vax for kids Confirming that the vax has been killing kids who were at negligible risk from Covid-19. But now everything's OK, right? Yeah, except the new formulation is untested just like the old formulation. So a question that needs to be asked is when will some people go to jail for pushing this untested, minimally effective, but demonstrably dangerous, so-called vaccine?


Illinois Reports 77.7% of Its Covid DEATHS Last Week Were “Vaccinated” Yet only 69% of the population has been "vaccinated." 

Posted by at No comments:

Tuesday, October 26, 2021

Why the US Center for Disease Control Is Lying About Natural Covid Immunity

Source
Michael Leunig, creator of this cartoon illustrating the plight of the unvaxxed, has been axed from his prime spot in The Age newspaper

By Aaron Kheriaty 

Human Flourishing, October 23, 2021: The science on the efficacy and durability of natural immunity is now overwhelming. Yet the CDC continues to recommend lifting restrictions on the vaccinated but not those who have recovered from Covid and have superior natural immunity. Vaccine mandates across the country likewise ignore natural immunity simply because the CDC is ignoring it. Those promulgating vaccine mandates feel no need to actually address the science on this question; instead, they simply fall back on the CDC’s recommendation that everyone—regardless of immunity status—get vaccinated.

There are many political reasons the CDC continues to ignore the scientific evidence on this issue. Here is a sampling of of these reasons, which are neither compelling nor grounded in scientific findings:

Public health officials worry that acknowledging natural immunity will lead people to deliberately try to get infected with Covid rather than getting vaccinated. The obvious response to this worry is that the natural immunity question is not about whether people should try to acquire natural immunity by deliberately getting infected; nobody is suggesting this. It is about the level of immunity afforded to those who have already recovered from Covid as compared to immunity from the vaccine.

Public health officials worry that establishing whether a potential vaccine recipient has already had Covid is too inefficient and cumbersome: officials downplay anything that might slow the efficiency of vaccination campaigns or complicate the simplistic “needle in every arm” public messaging. The response to this worry is likewise straightforward. Vaccination centers need not take on the burden of testing prior to vaccination; simply place the burden of proof on the vaccine recipients. Some people with prior infection may still want the vaccine; as long as they are provided accurate information regarding risks and benefits of vaccines in this population, they are free to get vaccinated. For those with natural immunity who consider their individual risks and benefits and decide to decline vaccination, policies can specify that it’s their responsibility to establish prior immunity. Simply provide the option to them of presenting previous positive PCR test results, or obtaining antibody testing or a T-cell test (which remains positive after antibodies inevitably decline). While there are many other problems with vaccine passports, if officials insist upon them, at the very least these should be immunity passports rather than vaccine passports: this model has has already been implemented in several European countries.

Public health officials worry that acknowledging natural immunity will amount to admitting the failure of their prior policies, which were implemented to slow or halt the spread of the virus. The two most basic numbers in immunology are incidence and prevalence: the former designates the rate of new cases over a given period of time, whereas the latter designates the rate of overall cases for a given period of time. Once the CDC acknowledges natural immunity, the obvious question is then about prevalence: how many Americans have already been infected with Covid since the pandemic began? That 20 months into the pandemic we don’t have an answer to this most basic question is astonishing, since it could easily be answered by randomly sampled population-based T-cell testing, or antibody testing sampled sequentially in a cohort every few months. If the CDC got back to epidemiological basics and finally did these essential studies, most scientists estimate that somewhere between 50% and 60% of the population will turn out to have natural immunity, including many who were vaccinated (which artificially elevates estimates of vaccine efficacy, by the way). In the mind of officials who never want to admit that they may have been wrong, this will suggest that—despite draconian lockdowns, social distancing, masking, scrubbing of surfaces, etc.—the virus nevertheless did what viruses do: over half of Americans got infected anyways. Self-interested public health agencies will see this as bad news. (The silver lining is that, of this huge number of people who have been infected with Covid, 99.8% will have survived, including 99.9996% of those under 50.)

There are other political and financial considerations unduly influencing public policy agencies like the CDC on Covid policies, which I will explore in later posts. Against these non-scientific roadblocks, which have little to do with public health and sound policymaking, how can responsible scientists help move the needle on the CDC’s position? Can legal pressure be applied to require the CDC—in an open and publicly transparent manner—to examine the science on natural immunity and give credible reasons for their policies on this issue?

In fact, precisely such legal pressure is already being applied, by a group of academic physicians and researchers (including yours truly) with the help of my team of lawyers at Siri & Glimstad. In my next post for subscribers, I will recount what has transpired with these efforts over the last several months and bring you up-to-date on where we are going next. This next post will also include links to the best summaries on the science of natural immunity, which we have submitted to the CDC. Stay tuned, and if you have not yet done so, consider subscribing for access.

 Related:

FDA Adviser Explains Why He Abstained From Vote on Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine for Young Children The abstainer, Dr. Michael Kurilla, explained his abstension saying “A ‘no’ vote would have been misconstrued as my opinion about the vaccine”. 

What a pathetic excuse for not voting in accordance with his belief that the Covid jab is not in the best interests of children. 


Idaho pathologist and owner and operator of a diagnostics lab, reports a ‘20 times increase’ of cancer in vaccinated patients

Killing Kids with the Vax for Fun and Profit

YouTube executive boasts about deleting over 1 million videos for “COVID misinformation”


Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, October 24, 2021

The Medical Bullshit That Provides the Cover-up for the Overthrow of a Free Society

By Blaise Edwards, M.D.

American Thinker, October 21, 2021: Doctors need to be called out.  From early in the pandemic, it was like a mass hypnosis or forgetfulness of everything we had learned in medical school.  Immune system knowledge was shelved and replaced by government dictates.  The thought of early outpatient treatment with “off label” drugs that could modulate the immune system was forbidden.  We essentially told patients that they had to go home and wait until they were sick enough to be hospitalized, then treatment would begin.  Imagine telling all diabetics that there is no metformin, Glucophage, or insulin.  Would we really wait until patients are in diabetic ketoacidosis, and then treat them only at the hospital?  It is medical malfeasance of a grand scale.

We physicians gave up our training and our reasonable medical thought process.  The reasons are multiple.  First, it was the easy way out.  Second, many of us are employed and fear reprisal.  Third, despite what the public thinks, we physicians are not bold leaders, we tend to be sheep, and are afraid of having an entire institution ostracize us or our colleagues to think us crazy.

As we got to the point of vaccine rollout, doctors were not using the scientific method, questioning and challenging prevailing hypotheses.  They kept their heads down, closed clinics, converted to telemedicine, and pushed only the jab.

I had conversations with doctors who are supposed experts in virology and immunology denying the lasting immunity of natural infection.  Conversations about natural immunity:

“I have antibodies.”

“But they will wane.”

“But I have memory cells.”

Dumbfounded look. 

Really, are these the leaders we want?

Other conversations about the safety of vaccines:

“The vaccine is safe.”

“No, we would have shut down any trial in the past after even 100 deaths.”

“This is more serious.”

“But the survival rate is about 99.6%.”

“It's killing people.”

“So is the vaccine”

“You can’t believe VAERS.”

“It was set up to help protect the public, and if anything, it is underreporting side effects.”

“You’re a conspiracy theorist.”

Or conversations about early treatment

“You must get the vaccine, it is the only “proven” treatment, there are no other treatments.”

“Really, ivermectin has eradicated COVID in India, parts of Mexico, Japan….”

“It is a horse dewormer.”

“It won a Nobel Prize in medicine, is a WHO essential drug, and has been around for decades with a great safety profile.”

“No, only the vaccine works.”

“But it is failing”

           “You are a denier and a conspiracy theorist.”

           “Sigh….”

Lately, it has been all about getting 100% of the population jabbed.  For what reason?  I am not sure, and some of the more detailed and investigated theories scare me.  I shudder to think.  But last year’s heroes are being labeled selfish and villainous for not getting the vaccine.  Hospital systems have abandoned their community’s health and ignored early successful outpatient treatment in favor of huge government subsidies for inpatient and ICU treatment.  The success of these treatments was not great, but that is another article.  Now we have the same hospital systems turning their backs on their own employees.  Basically, health providers have a choice, get shot, or get fired.  How does that help?  Both vaxxed and unvaxxed can spread the virus, so it doesn’t help anyone.  It only helps the hospital to get more government money by meeting quotas.

Read more

Related:

Arrest the Puppy Killer Fauci

James Corbett Interview: Iain Davis Dissects the Pseudopandemic

Canadian vaccine scientist admits toxic spike-protein vaccines a catastrophic  mistake -- Try telling that to Prime Minister Justinsensible Trudeau

The global population is roughly 7.8 billion people, if 10% have been infected that is 780 million cases. The global death toll currently attributed to Sars-Cov-2 infections is 1,061,539.

That’s an infection fatality rate of roughly or 0.14%. Right in line with seasonal flu and the predictions of many experts from all around the world.

0.14% is over 24 times LOWER than the WHO’s “provisional figure” of3.4% back in March. This figure was used in the models which were used to justify lockdowns and other draconian policies.

In fact, given the over-reporting of alleged Covid deaths, the IFR is likely even lower than 0.14%, and could show Covid to be much less dangerous than flu.

None of the mainstream press picked up on this. Though many outlets reported Dr Ryan’s words, they all attempted to make it a scary headline and spread more panic.

Apparently neither they, nor the WHO, were capable of doing the simple maths that shows us this is good news. And that the Covid sceptics have been right all along.

Ten red flags in the FDA's risk-benefit analysis of Pfizer's EUA application to inject American children 5 to 11 with its mRNA product

Acknowledgement:
As always, thanks to WRH and others listed at the top right for story links. 
Posted by at 2 comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

Saturday, October 23, 2021

Justin Trudeau's Prison Camp Canada: Why Is Canada's Prime Minister Acting Like a Moronic Arse Hole?

Trudeau: You can’t leave Canada if you’re Unvaccinated….

Trudeau aims to make "vaccination" mandatory by locking down the "unvaccinated" for ever. Prevented not only from leaving the country, but likely eventually locked in their own homes, denied access to the grocery store, schools and workplaces. 

 Why? 

Supposedly because the "unvaccinated" are a risk to the health and safety of the "vaccinated." 

But conclusive evidence refutes the claim. 

1. The "vaccinated" are susceptible to Covid infection. 

2. The "vaccinated" who are infected carry as high a viral load as the "unvaccinated" -- that's a statement from Rochelle Walinsky, Director of the US Center for Disease Control. 

3. "Increases in Covid cases are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States"-- that's the title of a peer-reviewed journal article in the European Journal of Epidemiology.

4. Millions of Canadians have superior immunity to Covid than the "vaccinated" because they've had Covid and thus acquired broad-spectrum Covid immunity, not just a bunch of variant-specific antibodies. Antibodies, that is, that  are of limited effectiveness against new Covid variants and which dissipate rapidly, thus necessitating a further shots within months to maintain whatever feeble Covid protection they are supposed to provide. 

Many so-called "anti-vaxxers" are in fact those who've had Covid and need no fucking jab, Trudeau, you retarded bastard. 

As Yale epidemiologist, Dr. Harvey Risch, explains: It's the "unvaccinated" who need protection from the "vaccinated."

What Canada has is a tyranny run by a self-declared dictatorship wannabe holding power with the support of less than one third of the population. 

Will intelligent, properly informed Canadians remain supine, subordinate, sycophantic, under the heel of this ridiculous prime ministerial jerk? 

We'll soon know, as millions of "unvaccinated" Canadians decide such questions as these:

Will "unvaccinated" students now in Canada but registered for study at a US or other foreign University, withdraw from their course of study?

Will "unvaccinated" Canadian students now abroad, accept that it is right and reasonable that they have been made an exile through the action of their own government.

Will unvaccinated persons whose business or profession requires them to travel abroad, abandon their career?

Let no one doubt, it was in fear of the response to such questions as these that Canada's blackface-loving Mussolini called an election during the Covid pandemic. 

It was to strengthen his hand against what he knew would be a popular backlash, when his stupid tyrannical intentions became known. 

But why Trudeau has so crassly declared the death of Canada as a free country, we have no explanation other than sheer stupidity. But we invite alternative suggestions.

Postscript: 
Does anyone know what would be the Canadian equivalent to "Let's go Brandon"? A lifetime free subscription to this blog for the best suggestion.

Related:

That's not your child to advise, slave. He belongs to the state.

National Post — Raymond de Souza: Overreach on COVID measures about power This is an excellent analysis demonstrating that Canada, a supposed constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy, is governed neither by its constitution nor its parliament. Rather we are ruled by bureaucrats and judges conforming to the dictates of unscrupulous politicians representing a remarkably small proportion of the population.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

Thursday, October 21, 2021

Victoria, Australia: Speaking for Freedom Against Medical Tyranny


Would that a legislator here in Victoria, British Columbia had the same sense, guts and eloquence to put a brake on Canada's political elite now on a tear for police state oppression of a once free people.

Related:

The Unvaccinated Are Looking Smarter Every Week

COVID Authoritarians Are The Cause Of America's Problems, Not The Unvaccinated

The Nuremberg Code 1947 Permissible Medical Experiments

certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:

1.     The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

2.     The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

3.     The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

4.     The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.

5.     The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

6.     No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

7.     The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

8.     Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.

9.     The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

10. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

11. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

Via WRH
Posted by at No comments:

Wednesday, October 20, 2021

Clinical Pathologist: The Spike Protein, Which Is the Active Vax Agent, Causes Irreversible Tissue Damage


Related:

NIH Admits Funding Gain-Of-Function COVID Experiments; Gives EcoHealth Five Days To Report Data:
"A top NIH official admitted in a Wednesday letter that the US-funded so-called "gain-of-function" research in Wuhan, China - and that the US nonprofit which conducted it, EcoHealth Alliance - led by the controversial Peter Daszak, "failed to report" that they had created a chimeric bat coronavirus which could infect humans. ..."

Official Government Docs Comparison Suggests “Fully Vaccinated” Are Developing AIDS (Sounds like insane fabrication. Or Armageddon has arrived.)

 Top scientists release study warning against COVID-19 vaccines, demand an immediate end to vaccinations


Why the Media Doesn't Question the Vax:

Dozens of workers at Los Alamos nuclear lab sue over vaccine mandate

Covid Deaths Before and After Vaccination Programs:

Natural Versus Vaccine Immunity:
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, October 19, 2021

American Insanity


Via Zero Hedge.
Posted by at No comments:

Monday, October 18, 2021

Yale Epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch: It's the Unvaccinated who should fear the vaccinated, not the other way around

Avi Abelow, Founder & CEO of The Pulse of Israel, recently interviewed Yale Epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch, MD, Ph.D. He asked, should the vaccinated fear the unvaccinated? Dr. Risch responded:

No. I put it the other way around. The unvaccinated should be afraid of the vaccinated. They’re just as infected. In fact, maybe more infected. If vaccinated, people are infected. So it is well known that it is the vaccinated people that generate the mutant strains and not the unvaccinated people. And that has led to the corruption of the medical establishment: saying that unvaccinated people are generating the mutants is an absolute falsehood. It is exactly the opposite. This has been known for 100 years that it’s vaccinated people who are more prone to generate mutant strains.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Friday, October 15, 2021

What the Science Says: the Vax Doesn't Stop the Spread

European Journal of Epidemiology 

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-021-00808-7

Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States


Findings

At the country-level, there appears to be no discernable relationship between percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases in the last 7 days (Fig. 1). In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people.* Notably, Israel with over 60% of their population fully vaccinated had the highest COVID-19 cases per 1 million people in the last 7 days. The lack of a meaningful association between percentage population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases is further exemplified, for instance, by comparison of Iceland and Portugal. Both countries have over 75% of their population fully vaccinated and have more COVID-19 cases per 1 million people than countries such as Vietnam and South Africa that have around 10% of their population fully vaccinated.

See the full text

* This finding should be no surprise. Vaccinated people are liable to infection and to carry as high a viral load as unvaccinated people, but they may believe that vaccination protects them from infection. Hence the vaccinated are likely to be less careful in minimizing the risk of infection than the unvaccinated. Less cautious that is, not only about being infected themselves, but about infecting others. So it's not the vaxxed who need protection from the unvaxxed, but the unvaxxed who need protection from the vaxxed. 

So what, again, was the reason for vaccine mandates?

Related:

Dr. Robert Malone likened what’s going on today with COVID vaccines to the illegal medical experiments conducted by Nazi Germany. “[During the Second World War], Jews and other ethnic groups were subjected to horrible experimental medical research,” Malone said. “And they justified it by saying it was for the common good.”

Malone said the Western World “agreed we weren’t going to do that anymore. Yet, from time to time we seem to forget, and of course, Tuskegee is one example, and frankly, this is another example.”

... Malone said fully vaccinated individuals can spread COVID. “The idea that if you have a workplace where everybody’s vaccinated, you’re not going to have virus spread is totally false. A total lie,” Malone said.

The vaccinated are actually the “super-spreaders” that everyone was told about in the beginning of the pandemic, Malone argued:

“If you consider the scientific fact that vaccinated people have less symptoms than the unvaccinated, but can still easily spread disease, consider your fellow vaccinated worker, whose unvaccinated son brought the disease home and gave it to him … He might not have any symptoms … but he’ll definitely be producing the virus. And he’s going to say, hey, I can go to work today. But he’s going to be spreading the virus like crazy.”


But not to worry:

Fully Vaccinated Former SecState Colin Powell Dies From COVID Complications
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, October 14, 2021

Covid, Lockdowns, Face Masks and Vaccine Mandates: Your Introduction to the New World Ordure

By Joaquin Flores

Strategic Culture Foundation, October 12, 2021: The new social credit system uses weaponised sociology and mass psychology such that the plutocratic ruling class can transform, with little disruption normally associated with the rotation of elites, into a post-financial technocracy. Therefore, the old social credit system of consumer credit, and likewise systems of law, become moribund. They are replaced by revolutionary methods of social control which a.) uses a sinister trauma-bonded ‘empathic-intuition’ method, at the individual level, b.) alongside pre-crime and permanent guilt as a systemic foundation, c.) and the loss of the 6th Amendment’s guarantee to know the crimes (and evidence) one is accused of. 

While the concerned public is familiar with the material technologies in plans of technocrats through various leaked documents, the exposure of summits and societies dedicated to this nefarious cause, the dark anti-human agenda that guides these goes even beyond the understanding of the well-informed. 

 At face value, social credit is marked by the imposition of a deviant libertine values system of the ruling class, upon the whole society. Secondly, as it is well-known, it micromanages individual’s goods and energy consumption.

Posted by at No comments:

How The British Government Committed Genocide Against Their Own People

 

Privacy Policy Feedback

Number of babies born to foreign mothers hit record high last year with 75% of births in parts of England among women from outside UK - as data shows total number of births fell 4% to two-decade low


Related:
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)