Tuesday, June 18, 2013

The Real Threat to British Elites

By Steve Sailer

Taki's Mag, June 5, 2013: Recent incidents of Muslims behaving badly—such as the butchering of British soldier Lee Rigby by two Islamic-convert African immigrants, the riots in Stockholm, and the never-ending revelations about numerous Pakistani pimps “grooming” very young white English girls for being gang-banged by their relatives—has European elites terrified…of European commoners.

For example, last week the European Parliament secretly voted to retroactively strip French nationalist Marine Le Pen, who won 17.9% of the national vote in the first round of the 2012 presidential election, of parliamentary immunity for comments made during her successful campaign for a law against prostration in the streets of France, opening her to prosecution for “hate speech.”

Similarly, the frequently feckless English police responded to the carnage in Woolwich by arresting social-media users.

British leaders repeatedly swept the Muslim statutory gang-rapist phenomenon under the rug for over a decade. Way back in 2001, Nick Griffin of the British National Party began to point out that Pakistani pimps in Britain were targeting white girls under 16.

It’s most useful to think of this practice not so much as pedophilia—a bizarre fetish—but as economically rational whoremastering. Pakistani pimps focus on recruiting very young postpubescent English girls because they are so naïve.

“It’s European men—with their talent for self-organization—who frighten Europe’s ruling class.”
As we’ve seen in recent years, Muslim male-chauvinist cultures that treat females like dirt tend to nurture males who have a knack for living off women’s earnings. Thus, Albanian pimps have come to dominate the European sex-slave trade. And the various Chechen layabouts who have been in the news in America since the Boston bombing have displayed a remarkable gift for getting attractive women to throw their lives away on them.

In contrast, women-respecting Swedes seldom make talented pimps.

In the many Pakistani grooming cases in England, Ali G types would convince silly little white girls that they were their boyfriends, provide them with drugs, then browbeat them into proving their love by having sex at a party with all the pimps’ Uncle Jamaals.
The genius of the system is that the pimps don’t pay the girls, not even their room and board. After each party, they dump them back at their moms’ council flats.

Is this rape?

Of course. These girls are adolescents, far too young to give consent to being gang-banged.

Is it racial?

Feminist Susan Brownmiller’s 1975 bestseller Against Our Will famously argued that “rape is a crime not of lust, but power.” That’s obviously missing much of the point. And yet conquest and rape seem to go together.

It might seem insane that this kind of Bronze Age predatory pattern would work so well in a sophisticated country such as England, but that’s exactly why it worked: Noticing patterns is now derided as “stereotyping.”

Moreover, the highest priority in Europe is to never provide any fodder for right-wing organizations. Thus, a decade ago when a Channel 4 documentary crew working on a snoozer about social workers in Bradford stumbled upon this widespread practice, the police insisted that Channel 4 postpone the documentary because it might help the BNP in upcoming elections. The network complied.

Read more

Monday, June 17, 2013

Canada Returns to the NeoCon Fold. Seeks Ouster of Thug Syrian Regime by US-Backed Cannibals

The Star, June 16, 2013: DUBLIN, IRELAND—On the eve of a summit of world leaders, Prime Minister Stephen Harper castigated Russian President Vladimir Putin for supporting “the thugs of the Assad regime” in Syria and said there’s no reason to hope other G8 leaders can convince Putin to help depose the Syrian strongman.

Harper, who wants an end to the dictatorship of President Bashar Assad to halt the bloody civil war in the Middle Eastern nation, went so far as to suggest Putin doesn’t deserve to sit at the table with leaders of some of the most advanced industrial democracies.

“I don’t think we should fool ourselves,” Harper said, using what may be his toughest language ever on the international stage. “This is the G7 plus one. Let’s be blunt, that’s what this is: the G7 plus one.”

Read more

Meantime, Zbigniew Brzezinski slams US policy on Syria

Washington Examiner, June 14, 2013: The president's abrupt decision to arm Syrian rebels is a huge mistake, one driven by emotion and propaganda not they kind of strategic White House plan that has marked past successful interventions in civil wars, according to former Carter-era national security chief Zbigniew Brzezinski.

In a broad attack on President Obama's vague interventionist policy, the highly-respected international affairs analyst warned that by jumping in to Syria's civil war with no plan is likely to lead to another costly and extended military action that could eventually draw U.S. forces into a clash with Syria's top ally Iran.

"I think our posture is baffling, there no strategic design, we're using slogans," slammed Brzezinski on MSNBC's Morning Joe Friday. "It's a tragedy and it's a mess in the making," he said. "I do not see what the United States right now is trying to accomplish."

Read more 
 
And Boris Johnson, Rival to UK PM, David Camerloon, Declares: Don't Arm Syrian Maniacs
 
Thanks to Aangirfan for the last two links and the following:

Zbiniew Brzezinski eviscerates Obama's foolish decision to fuel Syrian civil war:



See also:

21st Century Wire: On A False Premise: US looks to G8 Summit to build ‘consensus’ over Syria

Canada Defects from the NeoCon War Coalition

Sunday, June 16, 2013

Russian Parliament Bans Homosexual Propaganda Aimed At Minors

The Volokh Conspiracy, June 13, 2013: Russia Beyond the Headlines has the details; the Russian-language text of the bill is here. The bill covers “the dissemination of information, aimed at forming among minors [1] nontraditional sexual orientations, [2] an attraction to nontraditional sexual relationships, [3] a distorted perception about the social equal value of traditional and nontraditional sexual relationships, or [4] the imposition of information about nontraditional sexual relationships, creating an interest in such relationships” (translation mine). Russia Beyond the Headlines quotes “the State Duma’s committee on family, women’s and children’s affairs, Yelena Mizulina” as saying that “The term homosexuality [used in the first reading of the relevant bill] will not be used, we will use the term non-traditional sexual relations.”

The bill “was supported by 436 members of the 450-seat lower house” and “needs presidential endorsement to become law.”

Thursday, June 13, 2013

Massacre of the Bureaucrats

Alberta Fire's Entire Health Services Board, Never To Be Replaced

Dull though Canada may seem to the outsider, amusing things nevertheless sometimes happen here. A leaked video of Prime Minister Stephen Harper doing take-offs of his predecessors provides one example. Funnier, some will think, and perhaps more significant, was yesterday's massacre of Alberta's highest paid healthcare administrators. That story may even have a moral, though if so, we leave it to the reader to decide what.

By Don Braid

Calgary Herald, June 12, 2013: Alberta Health Services has had its share of bizarre moments, but it’s unlikely that anything will ever top the past two days, with the entire AHS board getting itself fired after fighting the government - for the sacred right to raise executive pay.

As excuses for a mass firing go, that’s a great one. But Health Minister Fred Horne’s move puts AHS into a whole new world. There will be an “official administrator” - Janet Davidson - and no board members at all. Horne did not say he will ever appoint another board.

Obviously, we’ll see a monument to perks champion Mike Duffy before there’s another health care uprising in Alberta. Nor will there be any more board meetings like the chaotic, embarrassing mess on Tuesday.

Timeline: Events leading up to the firing of the board

As the entire board thumbed its nose at the government, the meeting descended into weirdness even beyond ex-CEO Stephen Duckett’s 2010 departure after his cookie-eating episode, and the subsequent resignation of several board members.

Why did the AHS board stand up for $3.2 million in executive pay top-ups, even while hundreds of care workers and nurses are being laid off?

“At the end of the day, it’s a word called integrity,” chairman Stephen Lockwood said. “And while I’m the leader or chair of this board, we’ll continue to operate with integrity.”

Lockwood said he and the board were fighting for “autonomy” and the right to make decisions without interference from politicians.

“The world of politics is foreign to me, really,” said this man of painfully starched rectitude, one of the oddest figures to stride across Alberta’s public stage in many years.

“The world I live in is a world of right and wrong.”

The principles are noble, but Lockwood and his board took their last stand over an absurd freedom - the right to award pay perks to the highest-paid people in health care, with no apparent concern for the jarring clash with front-line realities of cuts and layoffs.

Read more

Monday, June 10, 2013

How Google, Facebook, Skype, Yahoo and AOL are all blatantly lying to their own users in denying NSA spy grid scheme

NaturalNews, June 8, 2013: What do Google, AOL, Skype, Facebook, Apple, Hotmail and Yahoo all have in common? They have all been caught turning over private user data to the government's spy agency, the NSA. All these companies routinely turn over the emails, voice calls, text chats, photos, files and even logins and passwords of their users, including Americans.

"There is a massive apparatus within the United States government that with complete secrecy has been building this enormous structure that has only one goal," journalist Glenn Greenwald recently told Piers Morgan (who knows all about spying and hacking people's private data). "And that is to destroy privacy and anonymity not just in the United States but around the world."

Tech companies rush to issue (false) denials

Immediately after these revelations surfaced over the past few days, all these companies began denying any involvement with the NSA. "Google CEO Larry Page and Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg are denying reports that depict two of the Internet’s most influential companies as willing participants in a secret government program that gives the National Security Agency unfettered access to email and other personal information transmitted on various online services," reports the San Francisco branch of CBS News.

But what nobody is yet revealing is that all these companies are required by law to LIE to their own customers about secret government surveillance.

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, you see, makes it a federal crime for any company participating in the surveillance to publicly acknowledge the existence of that surveillance. Thus, executives at Facebook, Google, Skype and others would all face arrest and federal prosecution as "terrorists" if they admitted the truth to their own users.

That's just how far down the rabbit hole this government surveillance program goes: Not only does the government spy on you and everything you do -- "they quite literally can watch your ideas as you type" -- the government can also force all the tech companies cooperating with the spying to publicly deny the existence of the program.

But the New York Times -- yes, the NYT which hardly ever engages is actual journalism -- has gone public with an article confirming that these tech companies did, indeed, concede to the NSA surveillance program. "They opened discussions with national security officials about developing technical methods to more efficiently and securely share the personal data of foreign users in response to lawful government requests. And in some cases, they changed their computer systems to do so," says the NYT in an article titled Tech Companies Concede to Surveillance Program.

Except it wasn't just "foreign users," it turns out. The program quickly ballooned to encompass users in the United States, too. The NYT goes on to report:

In at least two cases, at Google and Facebook, one of the plans discussed was to build separate, secure portals, like a digital version of the secure physical rooms that have long existed for classified information, in some instances on company servers. Through these online rooms, the government would request data, companies would deposit it and the government would retrieve it, people briefed on the discussions said.

This is how companies like Google and Facebook can claim, with a straight face, that the NSA doesn't have "backdoor access to our servers." They don't need it! What actually happens is that Google, Facebook, Yahoo and others simply deposit all user data at another location -- a "gateway" where the NSA copies it off.

Now you understand how to correctly parse this fake denial by Google's chief executive Larry Page, who says, "The U.S. government does not have direct access or a 'back door' to the information stored in our data centers."

It doesn't need "direct access." It has INDIRECT access that was set up by Google!

Here's the slide from the top secret PRISM program that tells the truth. (Click here for the original source page at the Washington Post).

Friday, June 7, 2013

Emma West: Abused and Traduced By the State

According to Emma West's friend, Kerry Finch, Emma West is not a racist. She is a sick woman, who has long suffered from severe depression and was heavily medicated with Citalopram, an antidepressant with perception distoriting side effects, at the time she engaged in a videoed rant on a Croydon tram, in which she pointed out, that other passengers were "not English" and urged them to "go back to your own country":

Said Ms. Finch: "Emma isn't a racist. She lost it because she is very unwell and lashed out in a way she knew would upset whoever happened to be there.

"Had the tram been full of pretty people she would have been calling them slags and prostitutes."

West, a former dental receptionist, has suffered from depression since she was 18, and had been admitted to a psychiatric unit in Purley a month before her tram tirade in October 2011.

As reported by the Croydon Advertiser:
 Miss Finch said that West had been sectioned under the Mental Health Act after attacking and hurling abuse at her for being "pretty".

Two days after being released, she went to see a therapist with her son at the Tamworth Road Resource Centre, in West Croydon.

"The session was pretty tough," said Miss Finch.

"She had spoken about things she hadn't spoken about before.

"Afterwards she had a glass of wine at lunch. It doesn't sound like much but on the medication she was on, it's always been enough to set her off."

West had taken 100mg of antidepressant Citalopram, more than twice the recommended limit.

Her barrister, David Martin-Sperry, said a recognised side-effect of the drug was developing "unusual ideas".

"When she got on the tram it was really busy," said Miss Finch.

"She was holding her son and no-one would give up their seat.

"Someone knocked into her and her son fell on the floor.

"That's when she behaved so despicably."

Though her rant, which included "You aren't British, you're black", was caught on camera by another passenger, no-one reported the incident to the police.
Oh, never mind that she was sick.

Indeed thank God for the mentally unstable, otherwise the genocidal state would have no one to make an example of.

Emma West drew the attention of millions to the fact that the English have been ethnically cleansed from South Croydon, as from many other urban centres in England. For that she must be punished for what she is, an opponent of genocide by mass immigration, otherwise known as genocide by anti-racism.

What would be good to see is an English rights group fund a first rate legal team to sue all the scoundrel newspapers and broadcasters who've called Emma West a racist. Unfortunately, the English rights movement seems to have been taken over by agents of the Security Service, clowns and ruffians like Nick Griffin and Tommy Robinson aka Yackety-Lemon, alias Paul McMasters, alias Paul Harris and sundry other names, who serves very well to discredit any expression of English opposition to national destruction.  

Canada Defects From the Neocon War Coalition

I want you to think very seriously over this question of poison gas. ... It is absurd to consider morality on this topic when everybody used it in the last war without a word of complaint from the moralists or the Church. On the other hand, in the last war bombing of open cities was regarded as forbidden. Now everybody does it as a matter of course. It is simply a question of fashion changing as she does between long and short skirts for women.
Memo from Winston Churchill to General Ismay, July 6, 1944
While Israel bombs Syria, and Britain and  France move closer to openly arming the Al Qaeda terrorists engaged in the Syrian civil war, Canada is out of step, urging restraint.

In a May 16 interview, Prime Minister Stephen Harper, who until recently, never saw a NeoCon war for Israel, oil and global empire that he didn't like said:
On Syria, I see a lot of criticism about inaction. I look at Syria over the last couple of years, and I would urge the president and everybody else extraordinary caution in jumping into this situation.
That was in stark contrast with the position taken by Canada's former Liberal Party leader, Michael Ignatieff, who in March, citing the R2P (Responsibility to Protect, aka our Right to Petroleum), urged outright, on the ground, Western participation in the war to overthrow the legitimate government of Syria:
I think the time has come for Canada to support the ... Syrian opposition... I think that Canada, as a member of NATO could play a very useful role in being part of the team that brings help to the liberated areas. What would really be damaging for the future would be if ordinary Syrians said “we freed our province” or “we freed our region, our town from air strikes and occupation and Assad’s troops and you did nothing to help us set up a free Syria.”
The Government of Canada, however, remains true to its anti-war stance, with Foreign Affairs minister, John Baird stating as recently as last week:
The only way to bring an end to the suffering of the Syrian people is a political solution. Over the past two-and-a-half years, we've seen more arms only led to more bloodshed, more suffering.
Meantime, the US threatens to seize Bashar al-Assad's toxic gas stockpile.

So what is going on? The Tory party of Canada, for so long subservient to the Israeli interest, is now in direct conflict with the powerful Canadian Israel lobby.

The simplest hypothesis is that it is the Israel lobby that has defected from the Tories, rather than the Tories having defected from the Israel lobby. Harper looks increasingly like a lame-duck leader, and Ignatieff's comments on Syria suggest that the Liberals are happy to offer submission to the lobby in exchange for its backing in the next Federal election.

But why would Harper risk antagonizing the Lobby by making Canada an outspoken opponent of open Western intervention in the Syrian civil war?  Two factors are likely prominent in Harper's mind.

First, the West's proxy war, waged by Al Qaeda and other Western-backed terrorist gangs is going badly. The Russians have not backed down from their commitment to supply Syria with the long-range S300 anti-aircraft missile system, which means that any attempt by NATO to impose a no-fly zone over Syria (i.e.,  a wide-ranging aerial bombing attack on Syrian Government forces) would be costly in aircraft and airmen's lives. And intervention on the ground could be even more costly, Syria now being assisted not only by Russian technicians setting up the S300 missile system, but powerful Hezbollah forces and North Korea advisers (i.e., Chinese proxies).

Second, US backing for the war on Syria, is probably not what it seems. The United States, has made NeoCon noises about Syria, but Obama, who according to ex-Presidential CIA briefer, Ray McGovern, lives in deep fear of assassination, shows little enthusiasm for the overthrow of the Syrian Government. Indeed, he is likely more concerned with the possible overthrow of his own government (perhaps as the result of a direct military coup, as argued by the highly unreliable but not altogether implausible Webster Tarpley), which the Israelis and the Israel lobby attempted to defeat during the last election.

Most likely, therefore, Harper, ever the strategist, finding himself jilted by the Israel lobby, has opted to serve as a stalking horse for Obama's cryptic no-more-Neocon-wars policy. The payoff, naturally, will be an assist to the Tories from the US Government during Canada's 2015 Federal election — or at the least, no tilt to the Liberals.

See also: 

Press TV: Britain, France prodding Obama into attacking Syria

Global Research: Former French Foreign Minister: The War against Syria was Planned Years Ago
 

Thursday, June 6, 2013

Sixty Years of British Brutality, Stupidity, and Genocidal Self-Destruction

(A) Brutality

This month, UK Foreign Secretary, William Hague, admitted what has long been know that Kenyans were tortured in the 1960's during the Mau Mau uprising against British Colonial rule.

Meantime the United Nations Torture Watchdog has called on Britain to widen and speed up investigations into allegations that British forces tortured detainees in Iraq and Afghanistan and prosecute those responsible.

Which is to say that torture remains standard practice with Britain's armed forces, a fact curiously never mentioned by Britain's heroic, self-proclaimed, anti-torture "whistle-blower," and advocate of the New World Order, former UK Ambassador, Craig Murray.

(B) Stupidity

The Mismanagement of Britain, a report by a former UK Treasury official concludes that:

• [Since 1970] The UK has experienced a long run decline in its general international competitiveness – not just against the emerging economies of the Far East, but also against other advanced economies.

• There has been an increasing deficit in the UK trading account in general goods and services funded mainly by North Sea oil revenue in the1980s and reliance on the financial sector since the 1990s.

• The UK economy has become like a very large bank, with international assets and liabilities that exceed 700 per cent of GDP.

• In three periods (the late 1970s, the late 1980s, and from about 2002 to 2008), the exchange rate was allowed to appreciate even though internal price levels were rising significantly. Policy-makers appeared blind to the resulting loss of competitiveness and its impact on the manufacturing base of the economy. This seems to be the result of misguided pride in having an apparently strong currency.

• Policy makers ignored that the underlying balance of trade in goods and services, which had been flattered for a time by oil revenues, was deteriorating rapidly: and that the deficit was being covered by borrowing, and by current income, both largely dependent on the financial sector.

• Policy-makers ignored risks the financial sector might pose to the economy, and how unstable the tax revenues derived from the financial sector might be.

• Decisions were regularly taken with the primary focus of benefiting or protecting the financial sector, but which were not in the interests of the wider economy.

• Any economy which had, as the UK economy did in 2009, a public sector deficit equivalent to over 11 per cent of GDP is poorly managed.

• The economy has been weakened by the financial sector, which means that the present model of the UK economy is unlikely to cope with the next serious shock to the financial sector.

• Almost a quarter of the UK economy’s external assets (equal to 240% of the UK's GDP) consist in financial derivatives.

• Confidence among international investors in the UK economy is deteriorating.

• The current model of the UK economy is unsustainable.

• The assets and liabilities of the British economy double every nine years relative to GDP. This rate of growth cannot continue indefinitely. When this growth does stop the income of the City of London from managing this growth will drop rapidly.

• The present model of the UK economy is at severe risk of imposing substantial burdens on the UK taxpayer, and could simply collapse.

(C) Genocidal Self-Destruction

The arrival of thousands of workers from eastern Europe has had “great advantages” for Britain, says John Bercow, speaker of Britain's House of Commons.
Bilderberg 2013. The ugly faces of globalization. Source.

In remarks that have raised questions about his political neutrality, the Speaker also attacked British critics of recent trends in immigration for their “bellicose and strident tone”.

What this smarmy cunt ignores is that whereas there are about 50 million Britons, excluding about ten million recent immigrants and their descendants, there are seven billion other people on this planet, which means that for every job in Britain there is something like one Briton versus 140 other potential applicants. From which it follows that not only is every Briton whose been done out of a job by an immigrant less well qualified than the immigrant who took that job but just about every other Briton including the Speaker of the House of Commons is a damn sight less competent than the best possible immigrant who might be found to replace them.

So what is this twat Bercow saying? He's saying fuck the English, if its more profitable to employ a foreigner, that's what we're gonna let every employer, including the gigantic overbloated British Government, do.

Thing is Berky, members of the House of Commons are supposed to represent the common people of England, not the whole goddam population of the world, so what you're saying amounts to treason. which is of course, what the whole British establishment is engaged in. The end game is the abolition of not only Britain as a unified nation, but the destruction of the British people as a single group with a national identity and a cultural, religious and racial homogeneity. Which means that all the blah about diversity amounts to a concerted globalist plan to destroy human diversity, reducing all mankind to one bastard race, lacking the beautiful local adaptation and chance variation that it has acquired through tens of thousands of years of natural selection.

And with the destruction of human diversity, biological and cultural, will be the subjugation of mankind to a culture that is nothing more than a byproduct of the commercial system or a construct of the system of politically correct indoctrination designed to reduce the masses to a slave caste entirely at the disposal of the money power.

See also:

Just because it's Christian, doesn't mean it's legal: Andrew Lilico on "Is Anglicanism still the State Religion in England?"

Robert Henderson: Emma West and the State

White Rabbit Radio: Anti-Racist Genocide

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

Another Twat American Billionaire

San Francisco billionaire, Tom Steyer, vows to block Keystone XL pipeline

As the New Word Ordure gets underway, very rich American twats are openly asserting their intention to dictate public policy, national interest, public interest or the wishes of the majority be damned.

Tom Steyer, is the founder of Farallon Capital Management, L.L.C., a pioneer in “absolute return” investing, that produces a positive return regardless of the directions of financial markets. He evidently has the Midas touch, but why does that grant him the right to dictate public policy? Simple. Because he's incredibly rich, so his opinion counts for more than that of 300 million Americans.

For American billionaires with an axe to grind, their time has come. They can deploy as much cash as they like to elect friends and destroy foes, to  dictate policy or prohibit it, and to shape public discourse.

Naturally, the new rulers are taking good care to control the flow of money in perpetuity. Thus, reports the New American:
A former insider at the World Bank, ex-Senior Counsel Karen Hudes, says the global financial system is dominated by a small group of corrupt, power-hungry figures centered around the privately owned U.S. Federal Reserve. The network has seized control of the media to cover up its crimes, too, she explained. In an interview with The New American, Hudes said that when she tried to blow the whistle on multiple problems at the World Bank, she was fired for her efforts. Now, along with a network of fellow whistleblowers, Hudes is determined to expose and end the corruption.
Which is pretty much to be expected. The bankers and financiers have had the upper hand now for more than half a century, as this report on the Bank if International Settlements makes clear.
Before the Nazis took the first step toward conquering Czechoslovakia in the late 1930s, Czech leaders had sent a portion of their gold reserves to their account with the little-known BIS, or Bank for International Settlements, believing it would keep the loot safe.

So when, in 1939, officers of the Czech national bank were ordered under threat of death to transfer 23.1 metric tons of gold from their BIS account to the BIS account of Germany’s Reichsbank, they believed that BIS officials would recognize that the orders had been given under duress and refuse the transfer.

What they didn’t count on was that the BIS didn’t care. Montagu Norman, the governor of the Bank of England and a BIS founder, said that “political considerations must not affect BIS transactions.” And with that, the Nazis looted over 23 tons of Czech gold “without a shot being fired.”

In “Tower of Basel,” veteran journalist Adam LeBor writes that the BIS might be the most important and influential bank in the world, and yet few even know of its existence.

Founded in 1930 by Norman and Reichsbank head Hjalmar Schacht to coordinate German reparations payments from World War I, the BIS quickly came to serve as a central bank for the world’s central banks, setting key policies for global banking and eventually playing a major role in the creation of the European Union.

But this massively influential and powerful bank is also shrouded in secrecy and accountable to no one.
There are, not doubt, legitimate reasons to challenge the desirability of the Keystone pipeline. But when some very rich shit baldly states that he's gonna stop the pipeline whatever the Hell anyone else thinks, you know America ain't no democracy and that all indications to the contrary are part of a charade.

Not that billionaire bastards always get their way. Sheldon Adelson, who made his money with casinos,  spent $150 million to oust Obama from the White House and failed, which is a good joke.

But next time, Adelson threatens he'll spend twice as much, though that ain't much at all to a guy worth $22 bill. And of course, the object of the expenditure is to ensure lower taxes for billionaires, so in fact the expenditure can be considered an investment — and tax deductible.

Sunday, June 2, 2013

Woolwich Killer's Brother In the Pay of MI6

Daily Mail, June 6, 2013: The younger brother of one of the men accused of murdering Drummer Lee Rigby was paid thousands of pounds by MI6 as part of spying operations in the Middle East, The Mail on Sunday has discovered.

Jeremiah Adebolajo, who uses the name Abul Jaleel, was also asked to help ‘turn’ his brother, Michael, to work for MI5, who were already aware of Michael’s close links to extremist groups.

The claims are made by the Adebolajo family and a well-placed source who contacted The Mail on Sunday.

Jeremiah Adebolajo, 26, who works as an English teacher at a university in Saudi Arabia and returned to Britain this week, is to be questioned about his brother by Scotland Yard counter-terrorism detectives today.

Government sources have already confirmed that Michael Adebolajo was known to MI5. Last week it was alleged that he rebuffed efforts by the security service to recruit him as a spy.

Michael, 28, was discharged from hospital on Friday and was yesterday charged with the murder of Drummer Rigby and attempted murder of two police officers on May 22 in Woolwich, South London.

Read more

Saturday, June 1, 2013

Wales Police Order Removal of “Obey Our Laws / Respect Our Beliefs / Or Get Out of Our Country”

The Voloch Conspiracy, June 1, 2013:

So reports the South Wales Argus (thanks to Prof. Bill Poser for the link):
A NEWPORT shopkeeper has been forced by police to remove a T-shirt from his shop window because they felt it “could be seen to be inciting racial hatred.”

Matthew Taylor, 35, the owner of Taylor’s clothes store on Emlyn Walk in the city, printed up and displayed the T-shirt with the slogan: “Obey our laws, respect our beliefs or get out of our country” after Drummer Lee Rigby, 25, was killed in near Woolwich barracks in London last week.

But following a complaint from a member of the public, police came to his store and threatened to arrest him unless he removed the Tshirt from sight....

A spokeswoman for Gwent police confirmed: “We did have a call from a member of the public. We visited the shop and asked him to remove it (the T-shirt) as it could be seen to be inciting racial hatred.” ...

Newport city councillor, Majid Rahman said: “I believe in freedom of speech and defend his rights to say what he wants, but once it starts offending people then it’s a police matter and it’s up to them whether they think it’s broken any laws.”
But of course — freedom of speech is all well and good, but once it starts offending people ....

Friday, May 31, 2013

Will Only a Greek Speak for England?

By Taki Theodoracopulos

Taki's Mag, May 31, 2013: Do any of you still like the dreaded word “diversity,” which is proudly flung around by those who squirm when the great Enoch Powell’s name comes up? If anything, Powell was a prophet, and after the latest London outrage, his so-called “Rivers of Blood” speech sure comes to mind. He got it right while midgets such as Heath and Howe sold and keep on selling the country out to diversity. Can any of you imagine a time when a British soldier was unsafe wearing a military uniform in his own country? Well, yes, when the IRA was blowing up horses and soldiers off the Hyde Park barracks, but Tony Blair made nice with them and those same nice guys collect English pounds and don’t even bother to attend Parliament. This same war criminal Blair, who lied and got Britain into two unnecessary wars so he could play big international statesman alongside the idiotic George W., is out collecting millions, none of which will go toward Drummer Lee Rigby’s two-year-old son or the rest of his family.

There is something very, very wrong here. Blair lies and plots and ends up getting thousands killed and crippled, making millions out of it. Rigby follows orders, does his duty, and gets hacked to death.

Channel 4 News invited the scumbag Choudary, a self-proclaimed imam, to speak his mind, and he sure did. Not a word about the victim and the cowardly crime of hacking a defenseless man to death with knives and meat cleavers, but plenty about what victims he and his fellow Muslims are. The idiotic woman interviewing him should have jammed the microphone in his ugly bearded face, gouging his eye out; instead she politely let him get on with it. Yet as a fellow panelist pointed out, the scumbag Choudary makes more than 25,000 pounds a year on benefits alone, far more than Private Rigby ever made while risking his life for his country. But I have yet to hear one of those pompous assholes in Parliament stand up and ensure that hatemongers such as Choudary have their benefits rescinded.

Britain is paying more to those who preach hate and encourage scum to go out and kill in cold blood than their victims earn while working and making an honest living. This is such an outrage, I’m happy not to be in London as I write this. Especially not in the vicinity of those pretentious types who sprinted toward the microphones to tell us that this murder most foul will make our community stronger. Like hell it will. Not as long as filth such as Choudary are allowed to live among us.

Socrates was the greatest of philosophers because he was the first to recognize and teach that virtue is knowledge and that we cannot be good until we know what is good. Enoch Powell knew full well what England was getting into by opening her borders to Muslims and Afro-Caribbean races. He also knew that the welfare state encourages indolence, lack of initiative, and the exploitation of the public purse. It also discourages an independent mind. The two subhumans who hacked an innocent young man to death are ignoramuses. They believe the rubbish that their hate preachers instill in their mini minds—hate preachers that our elites have tolerated all these years out of fear of being called racists.

The media is in cahoots with the PC scum, which silences those who don’t think alike and uses the very same media to do its dirty work. (While a white soldier is being hacked to death in London, top golfer Sergio Garcia may lose his sponsors because he makes a joke about fried chicken and Tiger Woods.)

Racism is a slogan designed to suppress constructive thought. Suppressing free thought has always been around. In the Middle Ages it was the “H” word, as in “heretic.” Now it’s the “R” word for “racist.” That’s how they got Enoch and that’s how they’ve managed to bring Europe to the state it is in today.

I write this in the airport in Nice just after seeing the news of the murder. As I write there are riots in Sweden—race riots, but the media are not reporting the fact that African and Muslim crowds—who came to Sweden solely to collect generous benefits—are attacking the police after a knife-wielding criminal was shot. There is no greater welfare state than Sweden in the whole wide world, yet African and Muslim immigrants on benefits with medical care and free housing—plus four youth centers within a radius of a few miles in northern Stockholm—are rioting because they cannot be provided with jobs adjacent to their housing! The Swedes deserve what they’re getting for having open borders where Africa and the subcontinent are concerned. But heaven forbid if one writes that in a Swedish newspaper. In America, as over here, the newspapers and television do not report a person’s color after a crime has been committed, only what kind of baseball cap he was wearing. See what I mean by oppressing free speech?

Nothing will come from the horror in Woolwich. Pompous politicians will give pompous speeches on television. No real measures—such as immediate deportation for anyone carrying a sign that incites violence—will be taken. Hate speech in mosques will not be monitored, nor will the hate preacher be arrested and deported. None of this will happen because the lefties in the Guardian might object. Our elites are as anxious to denounce the English Defence League as they were the bloody horror perpetrated in the name of Islam by those two black hoodlums.

A lot of people ask me why I don’t live in London anymore. Now you know. PC drove me out five years ago.

Source

Van Gogh's Paintings Brought to Life



Source: Luca Agnani via wimp.com

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Victims of the Boston Marathon Bombing: Real or Fake

The number of those reported killed or injured by the Boston Marathon bombs has varied, but on April 22, the Boston Globe reported 281 casualties including three dead, while on the same date, Reuters gave the slightly smaller total of 264.

But According to Professor James Tracy of Florida Atlantic university these are exorbitant figures differing sharply with the tallies provided on April 23 by the Boston Globe-owned website Boston.com, which listed only 54 bombing victims.

The 230 names added to the overall City of Boston count of April 23 appear, says Tracy, "to be phantom victims who might have sought care for modest injuries in the week following the incident but for which no records have been made publicly available."

Curiously, Tracy then quotes what he calls the "arguably excessive" eyewitness account of Roupen Bastajian, an off-duty Rhode Island State Trooper who told the Associated Press that on hearing the first detonation.
I started running toward the blast. And there were people all over the floor. We started grabbing tourniquets and started tying legs. A lot of people amputated. … At least 25 to 30 people have at least one leg missing, or an ankle missing, or two legs missing.
Since Tracy fails to explain why he calls this account "excessive," it can be taken to corroborate media reports of a large final casualty count. In particular, it establishes that there was a substantial number of serious injuries at the location of just one of the two explosions, consistent with a final count of serious plus lighter injuries resulting from both explosion mounting into the hundreds.

In sum, Tracy concludes with seeming illogic, "the photos, videos, stories and figures comprising the mediated Boston Marathon bombings do not add up and suggest elements of a manufactured event."

If, however, we turn to Tracy's MemoryHole Blog, we do find a rationale for the belief in "elements of a manufactured event." There we find a lengthy post analyzing photographic evidence suggesting that broadcast scenes of blood and mayhem are, in fact, pictures of actors, fake blood and phony heroics.

It is, therefore, a question of importance whether, as Professor Tracy contends, the injury toll from the Boston Marathon Bombings  were inflated if not entirely fictitious.

In that connection we have the testimony of Professor Michael B. Yaffe, David H. Koch Professor of Biology and Biological Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Chief Scientific Editor of the journal Science Signaling, who gave an interview to Science magazine concerning his experience on the day of the Boston Marathon Bombings.

Beside his role as a scholar, Professor Yaffe holds a position as a trauma surgeon at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, where he was summoned to attend victims of the bombings.

Concerning that day's events at the Beth Israel Medical Center, Professor Yaffe stated:
There were a total of 25 patients ... a number had traumatic amputations ... Extremities missing. Many of them had combinations of injuries: broken bones, soft tissue injuries with significant tissue loss. Some burns. A lot of ... it was pretty horrendous.
In response to a question about the role his scientific background played, professor Yaffe remarked:
When you take care of polytrauma patients you have to think integratively, because it is not just a broken bone or a laceration. You have to think about ... all the interactions between [body] systems ...
So here we have a top surgeon and a science scholar talking about the science behind the care of the Boston Marathon Bombings victims. That Professor Yaffe spoke to Science in his capacity not only as a surgeon but as a scientist is of relevance to the question of what really happened that day, because there is a rule of scientific discourse that no one is assumed to lie.

A scientist may be as dumb as a bag of hammers, or as mistaken about simple facts as it is possible to be, but it is assumed, among scientists, that another scientist talking as a scientist, however, dumb or plain wrong he may be, is honestly dumb or honestly plain wrong.

The corollary to that assumption, as with the similar assumption applied to parliamentarians, is that if a scientist speaking as a scientist is found beyond reasonable doubt to have deliberately lied about a matter of fact, he has broken a cardinal rule of his profession and is finished as a scientist.

Thus, as a former scientific person with some insight into the scientific mentality, my own conclusion is that Professor Yaffe was not lying through his teeth when he stated that the Beth Israel Hospital handled 25 Marathon Bombings victims, many seriously injured.

But the Beth Israel hospital was only one of Boston's five level-1 trauma centers that treated victims of the Marathon Bombings. In an interview with a University of British Columbia alumni magazine, Dr. Ron Walls, former Head of Emergency Medicine at UBC, now Chair of the Emergency Department at Boston's Brigham and Women's Hospital, states that 28 patients arrived for treatment at his hospital within the first hour of the emergency, three others arriving later.

Speaking of the emergency vehicle sirens, Walls said:
I've never heard anything like it. It was as if every vehicle with a siren turned its siren on and started moving at the same time.
Of the patients, Walls said,
Many had severe blast wounds to their lower bodies and partial amputations. Others had shrapnel wounds, including a penetrating neck injury that threatened the patient's ability to breath, a head injury, blown ear drums, smoke inhalations and burns. We had patients with ... large pieces of the muscle and skin and bone missing... Very bad fractures, the type of fracture you can only get with a tremendous amount of force.
Within minutes, Walls has seven operating rooms and surgical teams available to treat the wounded. None of the patients received died, a fact that Walls attributed to Marathon spectators who staunched wounds and paramedics who applied tourniquets at the bombing sites.

So, what to believe? That the reported casualty figures were "exhorbitant," or that the top surgeons at two of the five medical centers that received victims of the bombings are honest men of exceptional dedication reporting the truth.

For me the question is easily answered: whoever was behind the Boston Marathon Bombings and whatever their motivation, I accept the testimony of the Scholar, Professor Yaffe, and the distinguished former British Columbian, Dr. Ron Walls, that there were many seriously injured victims, with a total of 56 victims treated at just two of Boston's five level-1 trauma centers where victims were treated during the first hours after the bombings occurred.

So what of claims that videoed scenes of blood and mayhem were faked? It is a possibility, but to give the hypothesis credibility one needs a rationale for the fakery. But what rationale can there be for faking blood and mayhem if it has been established beyond reasonable doubt that Boston experienced the real thing that day?

Sunday, May 26, 2013

Woolwich Killer: Just a Nice Muslim Lad Pushed Over the Edge By Britain's Beastly Security Service

The Independent on Sunday, reports from a café in the shadow of a mosque in an east Lancashire town, just before midday prayers, a conversation with Mr. Zubyr, brother-in-law of Michael Adebolajo, the Woolwich decapitator:
"Why did he suddenly flip?" Asked Mr. Zubyr.

As family members struggled for explanations for Mr Adebolajo's actions, they speculated that pressure from the security services to turn informer may have pushed him to act.
There you are, poor lad, he'd been pestered. It'd be enough to make anyone take to hacking off heads.

Not that the Security Services had nothing to pester the lad about.

According to The Independent on Sunday, their own  investigation has revealed that Mr Adebolajo, the decapitator:
was one of seven youths arrested by Kenyan police on suspicion of trying to join the ranks of the al-Shabaab terrorist group in Somalia.

The young men had gone on a speedboat from Lamu island to Kizingitini, Pate island, where they were arrested by police who were waiting for them after a tip off. The group he was travelling with, which included two secondary-school boys, had been radicalised during weekly visits to a mosque in Mombasa, according to police sources.
Mr. Zuybyr, himself claimed to have been pestered by MI5 about informing for them after he returned from Yemen four years ago where he went, so he claims, to learn Arabic with his new wife.

In Yemen, apparently, his innocent intentions were so much misconstrued that he was "rounded up" and interrogated at gunpoint.

Then, on his return to England, he told the Independent on Sunday,
MI5 contacted me and showed significant interest in Michael. I was harassed for a while, with constant calls from people claiming to be from the FBI."
Mr Zuybyr and his wife then left their family in London and moved to Lancashire, but so he says, MI5 still tracked him down to question him about his brother-in-law.

Wow, kudos to MI5. They managed to track a man down from London to an unidentified town in East Lancashire.

Then there's Mr Adebolajo's elder brother, Jeremiah, who went to Saudi Arabia to teach English, where he was arrested and harassed by the authorities about his brother.

 So that's the kind of place multi-racial, multi-culti, super-tolerant Britain is nowadays. Lots of folks listening to Islamic preachers who hate the West then zipping around the most terrorist infested spots in the World and then getting so deeply upset when questioned by the authorities that they feel justified in hacking off someone's head.

Only a far-right-wing extremist, racist, Nazi-loving fascist could be against swamping the homeland of the English with millions of third world nutters, maniacs and haters of Western civilization for the purpose of rubbing people's noses in multiculturalism.

Friday, May 24, 2013

Fake Terror: Britain Follows in the Path of the United States of Acting?

Pioneered by the United States of Acting on 9/11, or was it in Dallas on 11/22, 1963, phony terrorism appears set to play a greater role in driving the Brits down the road to home grown tyranny, which is to say the tyranny of people like David Cameroon, leader of the Swivel-Eyed Loon (SEL) Party who seek to transform the English masses into a deracinated, deculturated, morally depraved and intellectually stunted slave caste at the disposal of, or quite probably for disposal by, the globalist elite who see no need for the English or any other race, preferring instead the company of other billionaires.  


After Woolwich: what's coming up for the Brits.

In this analysis by Truth Frequency Radio, it is suggested that the Woolwich hoax will prove to be a prelude to the roll out of a British equivalent of the TSA: you know, blue-gloved goons feeling your balls.

Presumably the Mengele branch of the Psychiatric profession has advised the British Security Service that once people allow themselves to be sexually humiliated in public on a regular basis, all resistance to authority is undermined.

It is possible, however, that some of the apparent Woolwich beheading fakery is itself fake, which can be debunked at a later date, thereby revealing the skeptics to be nothing more than swivel-eyed loons.

Still the entire story is so wacky that it is surely mostly bunk. Consider:

Loony African converts to Islam run over a soldier in London, on Wellington St. just round the corner from the Woolwich Arsenal, then they slash him to pieces with hatchets and knives without any interference from the public who seem either oblivious or totally indifferent to what is occurring. Afterwards, folks either walk right by the killers as if public decapitations were a normal part of London life, or they stop to engage the killers, still wielding bloody knives and meat cleavers, in lengthy conversation, while filming the proceedings for the evening television news. Then, twenty-minutes later, the cops arrive and shoot the perps as they engage in a suicide attack on their armed opponents.

Is this weird or what? Either Londoners have mutated into something totally zombiefied, or this was a performance by the British counterpart of the U.S. of Acting's Crisis Actors, self-proclaimed Trained Players and Actors Making It Real.

See Also:

21st Century Wire: Britain’s MI5 Connection to Woolwich Slasher Michael Adebolajo

BBC: Woolwich murder sparks anti-Muslim backlash
Since the attack, a number of people have been charged by police after allegedly offensive messages were posted on social media websites.

These include a 22-year-old man from Lincoln, a 28-year-old man from London, a 23-year-old woman from Southsea, and a 19-year-old man from Woking.

Three men - two from Gateshead and one from Stockton - have been arrested by Northumbria Police on suspicion of posting racist tweets.
See, it's really no prob. Bring in a few million people of an alien race, a religion of intolerance and a settler mentality and, when the natives become restless, just apply more political correctness.

Squeeze his balls once or twice, and the average Englishman will shut-the-fuck up and never do another racist tweet.

The British Security State now employs an army of spies not only to watch you every minute on ten million spy cameras, but to monitor your tweets, whatever the heck a tweet may be.

Britain, the land of freedom and free speech, not.

And in fact, those fellows from Gateshead were arrested solely on suspicion of posting racist tweets.

Brilliant, really, innit. Islamic colonists kill an English soldier in cold blood, then the politically correct state has a justification for a crack down on the indigenous population.

Sadly, your native Brit. is today, such a clueless, mentally, morally, spiritually and physically poisoned creature that he takes any amount of abuse from puppets of the globalist plutocracy, whereas what they should do, obviously, is apply tar and feathers to the creature at No. 10 Downing St and all the others aspiring to reside at the same address.

BBC: Friend Says MI5 Wanted Woolwich Killer to Work For Them
Friend promptly arrested.

Daily Mirror: Police Shoot Woolwich Killers
There's nothing fake about that, then. Or is there?

Could be that MI5 prospect with the knife is just a pretty good actor, as well as quick on his feet, and the cops were firing blanks.

Either way, the geniuses running the country have managed to bring the South African race war, or a simulation of it, home to England. Well done Cameroon/Brown/Blair/Major/Thatcher and all the other seriously bizarre leaders going back to that queer bugger Ted Heath.

Before It's News: Woolwich Beheading Video – THE MAN WITH BLOOD ON HIS HANDS

Eyre International: London’s false flag even more pathetic than the Boston Bombing
TV interview with British PM: David Cameroon, Leader of the Swivel-Eyed Loon (SEL) Party, confirmed that the government is considering the beheading a terrorist incident. Cameroon rushed to London to chair an emergency meeting on the incident:
Note: Yes he and his cabal will be conjuring up some thing rather nasty that could well bring in even more “Police State Laws” or even blame it on some group in the Middle East.

NewsFromAtlantis: Woolwich Beheading: A False Flag to usher in Internet Policing?

Merovee: Fake blood?

Aangirfan: WOOLWICH: FALSE FLAG: INSIDE JOB: FAKE

CluesForum: Woolwich 'Terror Attack' - SE London, 22.5.13

I asked the on-site police officer in our school:

I bet your briefing this morning at the station was an intense one.

Officer:

I was expecting exactly that, but it was just too odd. I asked why there's no briefing, believing we'd be told which streets to be in and what to look out for, but no. Nothing. It was as if it hadn't happened. In fact, the skipper said 'it didn't happen.'

He told me he didn't recognise any of the officers on his own patch at the scene either nor any of the members of the public, despite always seeing the same people.

In the school - in class - one pupil (14) said to me: Why isn't there any mention of the naked woman? - I asked the boy what he was talking about and he said 'there was a naked woman walking up the street, just all casual-like and then the next minute, there was this smashed up car and a bloke holding a wobbly body against a wall.'

Now these kids can tell a tale, but you know when they're lying and this didn't seem to be one of those times. Another pupil said: The Somali Woolwich Boys (local gang) cut each other up and shoot each other all the time and that never makes the news.'


Smoke and mirrors. Sleight of hand. Distract the public over there, while preparing something else..

All very odd. Last day before end of term tomorrow. I think next week will bring more craziness.
But at least the Daily Mail got the message right with the following Sub-Head:
'You and your children will be next': Islamic fanatics wielding meat cleavers butcher and try to behead a British soldier, taking their war on the West to a new level of horror
James Tracy: Media Disinformation and the “Conspiracy Panic” Phenomenon

Disclose TV: WOOLWICH FALSE FLAG BULLSHIT. MASSES ARE IN A TRANCE

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Sandy Hook Massacre: State Law Being Prepared in Secret to Keep Evidence From Public — Forever

Hartford Courant, May 21, 2013: The staffs of the state's top prosecutor and the governor's office have been working in secret with General Assembly leaders on legislation to withhold records related to the police investigation into the Dec. 14 Newtown elementary school massacre — including victims' photos, tapes of 911 calls, and possibly more.

The behind-the-scenes legislative effort came to light Tuesday when The Courant obtained a copy of an email by a top assistant to Chief State's Attorney Kevin Kane, Timothy J. Sugrue. Sugrue, an assistant state's attorney, discussed options considered so far, including blocking release of statements "made by a minor."

"There is complete agreement regarding photos etc., and audio tapes, although the act may allow the disclosure of audio transcripts," Sugrue wrote to Kane, two other Kane subordinates and to Danbury State's Attorney Stephen Sedensky, who is directing the investigation of the killings.
 
The bill that's being crafted has not been handled under routine legislative procedures — it hasn't gone through the committee process, which includes a public hearing, for example. Sugrue's email Tuesday indicated that a draft of the bill was being worked on by leaders in both the House and Senate, and might be ready as soon as the end of the day.

Read more 

Editorial: Why Is Newtown Investigation A Police Secret?
... Secrecy-obsessed prosecutors may seek to extend the 90-day court order sealing search warrant affidavits for the cars of shooter Adam Lanza and his mother, Nancy, as well as their Newtown home. Why should those affidavits be sealed? The Courant and several other media outlets are asking that they be made public. ...

Monday, May 20, 2013

Is David Cameron the Worst British Prime Minister Ever?


Islam to Supplant Christianity in Britain within a decade: Christianity has long been, and still is, the dominant religion in the U.K., but stats from a 2011 census study have recently emerged which suggest soon those Brits could be ditching it in favor of Islam. According to the Office for National Statistics, although 50 percent of Brits say they’re a Christian right now, aging believers and an influx of Islamic immigrants over the past decade means that experts predict there’ll be more Muslims than Christians in 10 years.

Meantime, Britain's PM and friends call Party Rank and File "Swivel-Eyed Loons."

And Cameron's big idea, gay marriage, heads for parliamentary defeat.

Breaking news: Cameron the worst British Prime Minister Ever. Even worse than Ted Heath.

And he may be the last British Prime Minister Ever.

David Cameron is judged by the British public to be weak, clueless, indecisive, out of touch and unpleasant.

Mish: Merkel pins Cameron.

Archbishop Cranmer: David Cameroon's Gay Marriage Bill is a threat to religious freedom

Cameron's biggest mistake? Being born, according to Tory MP Patrick Mercer.  

Friday, May 17, 2013

Did New World Order Critic, U.S. Congressman Larry MacDonald, Survive The 'Shootdown' Of KAL 007?

The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control.... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.
Rep. Larry McDonald
There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an institutional Anglophile network which opperates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups(Lord Milner's crew), has no aversion to cooperating with the communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the opperations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years in the early 1960s to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known."
Carroll Quigley, author of Tragedy and Hope (1966), Council on Foreign Relations member, professor and mentor to Bill Clinton at Georgetown University.
It’s a name that most people today aren’t familiar with, yet he was a man so far ahead of his time, one of those rare American individuals who could not only see what direction society and world was moving, but was courageous enough to challenge the elite power structure through his public life.


Some 30 years ago in September of 1983, Korean Airliner KAL007 was shot down in one of the most mysterious and murky episodes in modern history. Among the passengers on the ill-fated flight was as a U.S. representative from northwest Georgia’s 7th Congressional District, Congressman Lawrence Patton McDonald M.D.

As it turns out, Larry McDonald was right about so much, and possessed the foresight to see today’s globalization, WTO, the EU super state and the disintegration of the United States as a constitutional republic. Incredibly, McDonald also outlined (in the video interview below) how the US federal government would eventually move towards socialism, and restrict the Second Amendment and gun ownership in America. A visionary, to say the least.