Monday, February 3, 2025
Trump's Great Idea
Trump As Hitler
As Karl Marx wrote, "history repeats, first as tragedy, then as farce."
Confirming this, we have just witnessed President Trump's attempted emulation of Hitler's 1938 Anschluss, or annexation, of a neighboring state.
In Hitler's case the neighbor, Austria, was a mere one eighth the size of Germany. Trump, in comparison, has displayed far grander ambition. He seeks to acquire Canada, a territory larger even than the United States itself, and more than 100 times larger than the Austrian territory occupied by Hitler's Germany.
Oh, and while he's about it, Trump demands control of Greenland, with its abundance of ice, oil and fish and an area 25 times that of Austria. Plus he intends to take back the Panama canal.
As yet, no one seems to be taking Trump entirely seriously. Still I worry. Canada is not a perfect society -- far from it. Still after more than sixty years since arriving in my early twenties, I'm used to it and would hate to see it become merely a rather cool part of the United States of Aggression.
Saturday, January 18, 2025
Granddaughter of a pro-Nazi Newspaper Editor, Seeks to Lead Canada
Chrystia Freeland’s family connections to Ukrainian Nazis revolve around her maternal grandfather, ‘Michael’ Mykhailo Chomiak.
Chomiak was an editor of a Ukrainian-language Nazi propaganda newspaper called Krakivski Visti, published in Nazi-occupied Poland and later in Austria. It promoted anti-Semitic views and supported the German war effort against Jews and other groups.
Like so many other Ukrainian Nazis, Chomiak immigrated to Canada, where he reportedly became a ‘prominent member’ of the Ukrainian Canadian community. Source
But then Freeland is probably no more Fascistic than Justin Trudeau, the man who liked to wear blackface and wear a Nazi uniform. Fortunately, it probably won't matter who leads the "Liberal" Party of Canada during the next few years as it is not likely to regain power anytime soon, if ever.
Thursday, January 16, 2025
Britain's Woke, PC Government of DEI Fanatics
Far Left UK Government Proposes Banning "Controversial" Conversations
Yet:
Sticks and stones may break my bonesBut words shall never hurt meAn old English saying
I learnt those words at my mother's knee around seventy-five years ago. My mother, born in 1911, was raised on a farm. Folks were evidently harder-headed in those days, country folk, anyhow. Perhaps because, for most, life was harder then than it is today. My mother left school at 13 to earn a living. She took a job, arranged by a rich aunt, to work as a cashier at William Whiteley's department store in London's West End.
![]() |
William Whiteley's Bayswater store. Built in 1911, it was claimed to be the largest store in the world. The building was destroyed by German bombing during the the Blitz of World War II. |
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
The Rise in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Concentration Is No Delusion. And It Matters
Below, I have reproduced, copied, copyright-stolen, whatever, part of an editorial by Wall Street Journal opinion columnist Holman Jenkins, Jr. in which he suggests that efforts to limit, human-caused increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration are basically pointless.
True, efforts to limit human-caused increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration are effective only to the extent that they are designed in such a way as to be effective. But limiting the rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration is not impossible. Here's one way that would work.
Impose a carbon capture charge (CCC) on everything the production or use of which results in the release of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. Then use the revenue generated to capture atmospheric carbon dioxide and sequester it underground or convert it to mineral form.
So what of the cost? The lowest estimate of the cost of large scale direct air capture and sequestration of carbon dioxide is around US$100 per ton, or 10 Cents per kilogram. That means a carbon capture charge for gasoline, for example, would be US$0.23 per litre or US$0.89 per US Gallon.
Other products, meat, wool, cotton, lumber, etc., mostly generate less carbon per kilogram consumed than gasoline, or other fuels, including natural gas, diesel, and coal. What that means is that most or all human caused atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions could be recaptured without bankrupting the world.
How would governments deploy CCC revenue to achieve sequestration of human-caused carbon dioxide emissions? By inviting tenders and placing contracts with multiple bidders. In this way a variety of technologies could be evaluated at scale, until the best methods are identified and deployed.
Simple, really. So no need for Homan Jenkins of the Wall Street Journal to shrug off the problem of rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. A clear and simple path exists that allows mankind to end the transformation of the chemical composition of the air we breath.
True, not all governments will adopt such a program at once. But for those who take the lead, the cost of free riders can be eliminated by applying a carbon capture charge to goods from countries that fail to impose their own carbon capture charge, or other means to eliminate net carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere. The charge on imports could then be applied to the capture and sequestration of carbon dioxide, as with the carbon capture charge imposed on domestic goods and services.
Related
Canspeccy:
Rising Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Concentration, Part I: Carbon Dioxide Is Not a Greenhouse Gas
About Carbon Dioxide: We Got One Thing Right
End of a Climate Delusion
I may be stating the obvious but it needs to be pointed out. Voters and even political leaders are surprisingly poorly informed on this point. Emissions cuts in California don’t have any significant effect on California’s climate. They also have no global effect. California’s cuts are too small relative to the global whole; they also are largely illusory.
Emitting industries leave the state. They don’t stop emitting. If California imports Canadian hydro to charge its electric vehicles, consumers elsewhere have to burn more coal and gas. If Californians drive EVs, more gasoline is free to be burned by others, releasing more CO2 that influences climate change in California and everywhere else.
Green-energy subsidies do not reduce emissions. This will be news to millions of California voters. It contradicts a central tenet of state policy. It isn’t news to the actual enactors of these subsidies. A National Research Council study sponsored by congressional Democrats in 2008 concluded that such handouts were a “poor tool for reducing greenhouse gases” and called for carbon taxes instead.
Unfortunately, the incoming Obama administration quickly discovered it favored climate taxes only when Republicans were in charge. Backers would later engage in flagrant lying to promote Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act, knowingly citing bogus predictions that its trillion-dollar spending profusion would reduce emissions.
A 2019 University of Oregon study had already revealed the empirical truth: Green energy doesn’t replace fossil fuels, it enables more energy consumption overall. That same year the EPA calculated that the potential emissions savings from subsidizing electric vehicles had been offset five times over by the pickup truck and SUV boom Team Obama facilitated to assure the success of its auto bailout.
Last year, the premier journal Science put a nail in the question: 96% of policies supported worldwide as “reducing” emissions failed to do so, consisting mostly of handouts to green-energy interests.
Monday, January 13, 2025
The Cheapest House in Victoria, British Columbia
Sunday, January 12, 2025
Why Elon Musk Loves Britain But Hates Keir Starmer, by David Starkey
Friday, January 10, 2025
Canadian Commandos Slaughtered in Ukraine
Why is Canada's participation in the Ukraine war never discussed in either Parliament or the national media?
Short answer: because democracy in Canada is a fraud. Or as remarked by British Prime Minister, David Lloyd George during the course of World War 1:
"If people really knew what is happening on the battlefield, the war would be stopped tomorrow. But of course they don't know, and can't know. The correspondents don't write and the censorship wouldn't pass the truth. What they do send is not the war, but just a pretty picture of the war with everybody doing gallant deeds. The thing is horrible and beyond human nature to bear and I feel I can't go on with this bloody business."Needless to say, Lloyd George went on quite happily with the bloody business, remaining Prime Minister for as long as he could, as is the case with our very own wartime leader, Justin Trudeau whose multiple financial contributions on your and my behalf helps finance the ongoing bloody business in Ukraine.
Thursday, January 9, 2025
Robert Jenrick, UK Conservative Shadow Justice Minister: Britain's Unpunished Rape Gangs & Their Enablers
For decades the most appalling crimes from predominantly British-Pakistani men were legalised and actively covered up to prevent disorder.
The rule of law was abandoned to sustain the myth that diversity is our strength, destroying the lives of thousands of vulnerable white working class girls in the process.
This appalling affair is the final nail in the coffin for liberals who still cling to the argument that Britain is an integration success story.
The scandal started with the onset of mass migration. Importing hundreds of thousands of people from alien cultures, who possess medieval attitudes towards women, brought us here. And after 30 years of this disastrous experiment, we now have entrenched sectarian voting blocs that make it electoral suicide for some MPs to confront this. This scandal shows why we must end it.
The foreign nationals responsible must be deported - no ifs, no buts. And the officials that covered up must be sent to jail for their appalling cowardice.
Even that won’t be enough for the victims.
Bill Gates Calls for ‘Death Panels’ to Euthanize Citizens Not ‘Worthy of Healthcare’

Wednesday, January 8, 2025
In Politics There Are No Friends
Why has Trump abandoned his "friend" Farage? Probably because he sees Britain's Conservative Party making a comeback under the leadership of the feisty, pure Nigerian blooded, Kemi Badenock, daughter of a Nigerian political elite mother who flew to Britain a day before giving birth so that her child would have British birthright citizenship.
Kemi Badenock, born as Olukemi (later shortened to Kemi) Olufunto Adegoke, is certainly an impressive personality and a formidable opponent of Saint Keir Sanctimonious, leader of the British Government. More formidable, so Donald Trump has evidently concluded, than Nigel Farage, who now has reason to reflect on the truth of a remark by David Lloyd George, Britain's First-World-War Prime Minister: "In politics there are no friends."
Tuesday, January 7, 2025
Dutch MP: ‘Population Replacement In the Netherlands is a Fact’ Also in Canada Britain and Across the West
During the Asylum and Migration Budget Debate for 2025, van Meijeren delivered a searing critique of the Netherlands’ immigration policy, exposing its devastating societal and cultural impacts. Central to his speech was his use of the term “population replacement,” a phrase that has sparked intense debate and controversy in the parliament, with prior motions even attempting to ban its use*.
[*The attempted censorship confirms that the genocide of the Dutch people by mass immigration and suppression of the fertility of the indigenous population is deliberate, treasonous policy.]
Meijeren, while acknowledging the humanitarian responsibility to aid those fleeing violence, pointed to the obvious fact that uncontrolled immigration over decades had led to disastrous consequences. Citing data assembled by the Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), he highlighted a stark demographic shift: “Since 2000, the population of the Netherlands has grown by more than 2 million people, of whom about 95 percent are either migrants or the children of migrants. During the same period, the population of Dutch ethnic origins has decreased, with deaths exceeding births.”
Same in all the globalist-led nations, including Trudeau's Canada, Starmer's UK, Oaf Sholz's Germany, etc.
Sunday, January 5, 2025
Farage Spurns Musk's Suggestion of Gold for Subservience
Elon Musk, a techie of vast wealth and apparent genius, has embarked on a course of political action demonstrating crass ineptitude to an astonishing degree. His idea, it seems, is to dictate the course of nations by purchasing the allegiance of its politicians, with talk of, here a hundred million dollars, there a hundred million dollars. But in the case of Britain's Nigel Farage, Musk has stubbed his toe.
Farage is intent, evidently, on accomplishing what his millions of British supporters want; namely, to see an end to the flood of migrants to Britain's crowded shore; a flood currently flowing at the rate of more than a million a year, which is about 50% higher than the birth rate. Hence Farage's refusal of Musk's demand that he campaign for the release from prison of Tommy Robinson, otherwise known by his classier birth name, Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon. Robinson, who has protested mass migration to Britain, has also earned a string of criminal convictions and is currently serving an 18-month jail term after admitting to contempt of court in a long-running libel case involving a Syrian refugee.
So what Musk demanded of Farage, a demand that Farage declined, was to abandon his own campaign against mass immigration, a campaign that has brought the Reform Party, of which Farage is the leader, to a near dead heat opinion poll ranking with the opposition Conservative Party, in order to support a campaign for the release of a convict of dubious character who can only bring Farage and his Reform Party into disrepute.
Adding to the foolishness, if not malice, Musk then swanned over to Germany to give a thumbs up to the Alternative für Deutschland, a polical party widely held to be tainted by Hitlerism. Farage's response to Musk's stupid comments has been remarkably mild, demonstrating thereby that whereas Musk can be an idiot and an intellectual thug, Farage is a seasoned, astute, and rather forgiving politician.
Taki's Mag: Reap On, ElonSaturday, January 4, 2025
Dark Energy May Not Exist: Something Stranger Might Explain The Universe
There might not be a mysterious 'dark' force accelerating the expansion of the Universe after all. The truth could be much stranger – bubbles of space where time passes at drastically different rates.
The passage of time isn't as constant as our experience with it suggests. Areas of higher gravity experience a slower pace of time compared with areas where gravity is weaker, a fact that could have some pretty major implications on how we compare rates of cosmic expansion according to a recently developed model called timescape cosmology.
Discrepancies in how fast time passes in different regions of the Universe could add up to billions of years, giving some places more time to expand than others. When we look at distant objects through these time-warping bubbles, it could create the illusion that the expansion of the Universe is accelerating.
Two new studies have analyzed more than 1,500 supernovae to investigate how likely the concept could be.
Friday, January 3, 2025
"Should be in Prison": Britain's "Safeguarding" Minister Refuses to Investigate Rape Gangs
The UK's Labour party is under fire for its refusal to back a public inquiry into historic sexual abuse by grooming gangs in Oldham, with critics accusing the party of prioritizing political optics over justice for victims.
The decision has sparked outrage, with Elon Musk branding it "disgraceful" and Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch calling for a long-overdue national inquiry into rape gangs. "2025 must be the year the victims start to get justice," Badenoch declared.
At the center of the controversy is Labour’s safeguarding minister Jess Phillips, who insisted that the decision to launch an investigation was "for Oldham Council alone."

This comes despite a 2022 report revealing that children in Oldham were failed by agencies meant to protect them amid allegations of grooming by “predominantly Pakistani offenders” in council homes, shisha bars, and taxis.
Oldham Council’s Labour group previously agreed to support an independent inquiry, even writing to Phillips twice to urge the Home Office to back the move.
Tommy Robinson Speaks Out from PrisonWednesday, January 1, 2025
Time To X X?
Elon Musk Continues to Demonetize Critics on X, Remove Their Blue Checkmarks
About Musk's bud, Vivek
Tuesday, December 31, 2024
Crime and Nourishment
@ValerieAnne1970
In Prisons, Replacing Junk Food With Whole Foods Reduced Violence By 80%
In Juvenile Detention Centers, Replacing Junk Food With Whole Foods Reduced Violence By 91%
Sunday, December 29, 2024
Are You What Elon Musk Calls a "Hateful Unrepentant Racist"?
In a statement concerning the opposition of some Republicans to immigration of tech workers to the US, Elon Musk stated:
"Hateful, Unrepentant Racists" Should Be Removed from the Republican Party "Root and Stem"
But the meaning of this statement is not at all clear.
For one thing, why does Musk qualify "Racist" with the term "Unrepentant"?
My guess is that he does so for the same reason he would never refer to a liberal with views similar to his own as "unrepentant," repentance being only for those who are in the wrong. So to talk of an "unrepentant racist" is simply a fancy way of saying that a racist is someone who is willfully wrong, or as one might say, "depraved."
For another thing, why exactly does Musk call racists "Hateful"? The term is ambiguous. It can mean filled with hate or, quite differently, deserving of hatred. Is Musk even sure what he means? Perhaps he is merely seeking to establish his PC moral cred, in which case the actual meaning, if any, is irrelevant. But if he means to convey a significant message, then he needs to speak more clearly. But since we are unlikely to receive clarification of his statement from Musk himself, we'll do our best here to unravel its meaning here.
To a liberal, the implication that a racist person is corrupt or depraved may be an article of faith. But is it correct? To answer that, we need to be clear as to what a "Racist" is. That's difficult to state succinctly because the term has more than one definition. Merriam-Webster's dictionary, for example, says a racist is:
someone who holds the belief that race is a fundamental determinant of human traits and capacities.
Rather differently, however, the Cambridge Dictionary says that a racist is someone who:
believes that their race makes them better, more intelligent, more moral, etc. than people of other races.
Thus, according to Webster, a racist is simply an unrepentant scientific realist. But Musk is surely not presuming to repudiate the science of evolutionary biology. Therefore, we must conclude that his disdain is directed at racists of the Cambridge Dictionary variety, aka racial supremacists.
Inconveniently for Musk, however, it is the case that the human races do differ objectively in many respects including moral precepts, intellect, and physique. To take one of a vast number of possible examples, Australian aborigines are good at finding their way in the bush, a capacity related to the fact that they have a larger visual cortex than either mine or yours dear reader. They are, in other words, in some particular way at least, more intelligent, intellectually superior one might say, to other races.
Furthermore, vast cultural differences may divide racial groups, as for example between adherents of, say, Western, aka Christian, civilization, and practitioners of Voodoo.
As the result of natural selection operating in different environments and in response to random genetic change, human populations that have long existed in relative isolation differ from one another not only culturally but genetically. As a result, these long separated human populations, aka races, can be differentiated on numerous scales from IQ, to cultural sophistication, and from cranial capacity to skin color and resistance to cancer due to solar radiation. These differences have huge implications for the consequences of human population migration. Humans, like all living creatures, exist only as the result of perpetual reproduction. Loss of the capacity to reproduce, whether by a species, a race, a variety, or a family means extinction. Thus, when populations migrate to places already populated they threaten the survival of the resident population by competing for the resources necessary to existence.
If migrants to an inhabited area look and behave like the locals, friction will be at a minimum. But when migrants look or behave differently than the natives, then expect trouble. Each of the Earth's multitude of life forms pesists only by maintaining their gene pool from one generation to the next. Through competition for living space and other resources mass human immigration reduces the reproductive opportunity of a native population. Immigration is thus always a threat. Moreover, immigration not only reduces the size of the native gene pool by reducing the resources available to support the native population, it also transforms the native gene pool through interracial breeding.
It is because ordinary folk understand its consequences for their own race that anywhere and everywhere they push back against mass immigration -- for example, against the ten million illegals to the US during Biden's last year, or several million mostly unemployed migrants to Starmer's Britain. So what Musk calls "Hateful Unrepentant Racism" is what any Darwinian will recognize as adaptive behavior conducive to the perpetuation of a native population, its genes, its culture, language, and religion undiluted by genetic and cultural introjection.
-----------
LOL, Steve Bannon calls Musk a globalist: "You'd take a cheque from Adolph Hitler."
Meantime, Musk has doubled down, stating: "The reason I’m in America along with so many critical people who built SpaceX, Tesla and hundreds of other companies that made America strong is because of H1B. Take a big step back and FUCK YOURSELF in the face. I will go to war on this issue the likes of which you cannot…"
Such comment makes clear why, despite the cash they might bring to the table, appointing a tech tycoon with Aspergers to any significant political role would be a mistake.
And Musk is mistaken if he thinks that it's the trickle of genius migrants to which ordinary folk in any country object. It's not. It's the mass immigration of cheap labor, such as the the nine-dollar-an-hour Indian programmers (and here) who wrote the so-called MCAS software that crashed two Boeing 737s in 2019. These people, like the migrants to Britain who account for 42% of the National Health Service's staff, compete directly with native labor, driving down wages and driving up unemployment, while they compete with the native working class for housing, thus driving the cost of housing sky high.
Related:
French Intel Chief Says Muslim Brotherhood is Working to Turn France Into an Islamic Caliphate