It’s truly unsettling to think that he might have the opportunity to help lead America. #VOTETRUMPVANCE2024
Monday, September 23, 2024
Putin Threatens Armageddon: Biden Backs Off
Losing his war with Russia badly, Zelensky's sought to hand it off to NATO by making Ukraine the launch pad for NATO missile strikes deep inside Russia.
Low-IQ NATO enthusiasts such as Kwier Stormer and Justintelligent (Barely) Trudeau applauded.
But then Putin drew Biden's attention to Russia's nuclear war doctrine:
Threaten the survival of the Russian state and the nukes fly: all of them.
Biden, though in evident cognitive decline, got the message. So no mushroom clouds in your neighborhood -- for now.
Meantime, Zelensky, in America. snears at those who oppose the launch of World War Three on behalf of his shitty, self-destructing, lunatic-asylum country.
Pray for Peace, as the Madmen of the West are About to Plunge the World into a Mass-Death Scenario
Low-IQ NATO enthusiasts such as Kwier Stormer and Justintelligent (Barely) Trudeau applauded.
But then Putin drew Biden's attention to Russia's nuclear war doctrine:
Threaten the survival of the Russian state and the nukes fly: all of them.
Biden, though in evident cognitive decline, got the message. So no mushroom clouds in your neighborhood -- for now.
Meantime, Zelensky, in America. snears at those who oppose the launch of World War Three on behalf of his shitty, self-destructing, lunatic-asylum country.
Pray for Peace, as the Madmen of the West are About to Plunge the World into a Mass-Death Scenario
Saturday, September 21, 2024
Thursday, September 19, 2024
Tuesday, September 17, 2024
Saturday, September 14, 2024
Justin Trudeau For World War III
So when NATO follows our Justin's advice and lobs a missile deep inside Russian territory, you folks on Parliament Hill should remember that Putin can take out the Peace Tower with a world-circling, nuclear-powered cruise missile.
Wednesday, September 11, 2024
The 9/11 Hoax
When I was in school in the early 1950's, the head of my school took a sabbatical in Moscow, Russia. On his return he was asked what life was like for ordinary Russians, to which he replied that the Russian people, were "living with lies." Today, the American people suffer likewise.
Is The Migrant Invasion Part Of The Cloward-Piven Strategy To Collapse The Nation? That's certainly consistent with Justin Trudeau's manifest desire to rule as a dictator -- Just like Xi of China, whose regime he so much admires. Tuesday, September 10, 2024
Billionaires For More Babies: How to Feed Them (the babies that is)
Both Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos say that the human population needs to be greatly increased. Their argument summarized is that "If we had a trillion people we would have a thousand Mozarts at any one time."
Apart from the implied assumption that a decent quality of life could be maintained in a world with one hundred times as many people as exist on Earth today, the claim is startling in its assumption that such a massive increase in population density is even feasible. But remarkably, as I show here, it probably is.
The Earth's surface area is five hundred million square kilometers. Of that, dry land accounts for only one third, or one hundred and sixty-six million square kilometers. Of that total land area, only about two-thirds, or about 11 billion hectares, might ever be considered habitable.
An increase in global population from the current seven billion persons to one trillion would mean a reduction in habitable land per person from 17,000 square meters to just 110 square meters, or less than half the size of a tennis court. A bit crowded that at about twice the density of present-day Greater London, although still three times as spacious as Manhattan Island.
Which raises the question, where would food be grown. Well, consider Manhattan, all residents could be accomodated in a total of 444 100-storey tower apartments with an average of 36 residents per floor. Occupying just 5% of Manhattan's total area, these buildings would leave nearly all of the Island free for agriculture and recreation.
Alternatively, the entire population of Manhattan might be accomodated in a total of just 16 one-mile-high buildings such as proposed by Frank Lloyd Wright.
So one trillion people could be accommodated on around one-third of the world's habitable land leaving the remaining two-thirds unoccupied.
But this may not be the optimal arrangement. Why live on the land at all? The oceans cover twice as much of the Earth's surface as the land. So why not create floating structures, fully engineered human habitats, where transportation, resource-use efficiency, and food production can be optimized? That would leave the World's continents free for recreation.
The oceans could be colonized by the creation of a network of "floats" arranged around "lagoons" in the shelter of which all kinds of much less massive floating structures could be safely harbored. Thus, for example, a network of hexagonal lagoons surrounded by floats 10 km long and one km wide. If each float were occupied at the density of present-day Manhattan Island, each floating cell would accomodate 1.1 million people, or about 3,666 people per square kilometer of ocean surface. At that density, one trillion people would occupy about 273 million square kilometers or about 80% of the entire ocean surface area.
Much of the ocean is not well suited to human occupation, because of low temperatures, stormy weather, etc. It would be necessary, therefore, to raise the population density to around 7,500 per square km, which is comparable to the density of today's Greater London. This could be achieved by covering around 5% of the area of each lagoon with houseboats. The rest of the lagoon would be available for floating factories, farms, and solar panels.
Energy
Current global energy consumption is around 2.5 kW per person. At that rate the Trillion Person World (TPW) would require 2,300 TW of power, or about 154 times as much as currently produced worldwide. Oil reserves are about to run out. Gas and coal reserves, though much greater than those of oil, would not last until the transition to a TPW. Nuclear fusion might provide energy for a TPW, but solar power will be adequate.
The Earth's receives a year-round-average of around 0.25 KW of solar radiation per square meter. The total solar energy imput to earth is, therefore, 1.25 ✕ 108 TW, or just over eight thousand times current energy consumption and 50 times the anticipated requirement of the TPW. Thus, assuming advanced solar cells with an energy conversion efficiency of 50%, the entire energy requirement of the TPW could be met with solar cells covering about 2% of the Earth's surface.
Food
Human food requirements vary with body weight, age, and activity. For an entire population, I will assume an average consumption of 2400 Calories oer day, which is equal to 2.79KWh per day, or as a rate, 0.116KW.
All human food is, directly or indirectly, of plant origin and therefore its energy content derives from the conversion of solar radiation. Plants vary in the efficiency with which they convert solar radiation into the chemical energy of biomass. The highest conversion efficiency under ideal conditions is around 7%, although for field-grown plants year-round efficiencies are lower: probably around 2%. However, only about half of crop biomass comprises edible matter. Therefore, humans derive energy fromn sunlight falling on cultivated crops with an overall efficiency of about 1%.
To derive 0.116 KW of energy from sunlight by way of a vegetarian diet, each human thus requires a year-round mean solar energy flux of about 11 KW, which equals the sunlight falling on approximately 40 square meters of the Earth's surface in the temperate and tropical zones.
Today, arable crop lands comprise around 11% of earth's land area, or just under 16 million square kilometers. That is only 39% of the area needed to feed one trillion people with a vegetarian diet. However, the land area devoted to arable crops is a function of demand. If food demand increases, so also will the area of land developed for crop production. Urban expansion at the expense of crop land may be reversed. Lower grades of land will be converted to arable production. Mountain sides may be terraced, deserts irrigated, swamps drained, forests cleared. A 150% increase in the proportion of the Earth's land area devoted to crop production, from 10% to 25% of total area, is thus quite feasible given sufficient time and capital.
Theoretically, therefore, a population of one trillion could be fed, barely, by extension of conventional field crop production. However, food production need not be limited to the land, and if most of the population is located on the ocean, food production will likely also take place there.
Populations living on floats surrounding a network of oceanic lagoons, would grow food crops within the shelter of the lagoons on low-cost floating structures. Most crops would likely be protected by greenhouses, which by optimizing climatic conditions, achieve the most efficient use of solar radiation. With only modest advances in crop plant genetics, and crop management techniques, one could expect light utiliztion efficiency of three to four percent, meaning that a minimal diet for one trillion people could be produced with a growing space of about 11 million square kilometers. That is about 8% of the ocean surface covered by the proposed network of lagoons, or an average of about 2,000 hectares (4,500 acres) per lagoon.
An implication of the foregoing calculations is that global food production could be increased to support a population of two, four, or even eight trillion. Beyond that point food production would be limited by the solar radiation interecepted by the Earth: a limit that could be exceeded only by the adoption of a radical new energy source for food production.
Water
For a population living near the ocean, water supply is not a significant problem as sea water desalination by reverse osmosis is cheap, around $0.60 per cubic meter, or six one hundredths of a cent per liter. This is much less than the cost of desalinated water on land because it avoids the energy cost of pumping desalinated water up hill, which over a significant elevation greatly exceeds the cost of desalination.
In a totally engineered floating habitat, the cost of fresh water should be well below that of desalinated sea water, as sanitary, industrial and agricultural sources of waste water, plus rainwater would would flow into separate sewer systems each to be purified in the most efficient way, with the recoverty of useful constituents, including metal ions, and plant nutrients.
Other Resources
The main resources required in the construction of a floating habitat are abundant: these include limestone from which to manufacture cement, and sand from which the concrete floats would be built. Use of aerated concrete would reduce the quantity of concrete used and make all floating structures unsinkable, even if flooded.
The demand for other resources, in particular metals and feedstocks for plastics and organic chemicals would be enormous compared with the present day. However, structures and processes would be designed to minimize the requirement for limiting resources. Plastics made from plant matter such as cellulose and starch would likely be used widely, as would abundant metals such as aluminum and iron, the third and fourth most abundant elements in the Earth's crust.
Monday, September 9, 2024
Canada's Reproductive Failure
Canadians are a dying nation with a death rate twice the birth rate.
Canada's rapid population growth despite a dying population is driven by mass immigration.
The immigrants, no doubt good people for the most part, have no hereditary relationship with the historic Canadian nation. They are a replacement for the historic Canadian nation, which, under the psychopatic leadership of the Trudeauvian Liberal Party, is being quietly driven to extinction.
For the survival of the Canadian nation, Canada needs not more immigrants but more babies. But this would cost. More maternity hospital beds, more schools and universities. Thus say the Trudeauvians, better to import people fully grown with expertise, diplomas and university degrees acquired at some other nation's expense.
Thus Canada lives by the infusion of talent from other nations, the newcomers themselves becoming part of a dying nation.
What to do?
The election of a Conservative government headed by Pierre Poilievre, the bastard child of an unmarried teenager, might be a good start. But what is the Conservative Party's population policy? Will a Tory government get the condom dispensers out of high school washrooms? Will they outlaw abortion as birth control?
Contrary to Trudeau's genocidal policy of mass immigration, Canada should slash immigration rates to improve employment opportunity and lower housing costs for the native-born, with positive effects on the fertility of native-born Canadians. Such measures should be maintained until such time as the fertility rate catches up with the death rate. The rest of the West, dying nations including Germany, Britain, France, Italy, and the United States, need to adopt similar measures.
Here, for Germany, is how the West's drive for national suicide looks in a chart:
Friday, September 6, 2024
Kamala's Multi-Talented Veep
Here's the man only a heart-beat away from the American Presidency and the "Leadership of the Free World."
But the good news:
Phew. Thank heaven for that.
Meantime:
And:
Wednesday, September 4, 2024
Thursday, August 29, 2024
Wednesday, August 28, 2024
Richard Gage: 10 Facts You May Not Know About 9/11
Watch this 17-second video first:
Now, what are those facts?
1. …that the third Tower, 47-story WTC Building 7, not hit by a plane, collapsed at 5:20pm on 9/11.
2. …that Building 7 fell at free-fall acceleration, which means that not one of its 81 columns gave any resistance. Where did they go?
3. …that Building 7 fell symmetrically — in the exact manner of a classic controlled demolition.
4. …that molten iron, the byproduct of the incendiary thermite, was found by first responders in pools throughout the debris pile of all 3 towers, and pouring out of the South Tower minutes prior to its collapse.
5. …that witnesses heard and felt explosions prior to the collapse of Building 7.
6. …that 186 First Responders were recorded hearing, seeing, feeling, explosions as well as flashes of light prior to the "collapses" of the Twin Towers.
7. …that the Twin Towers came down in 2/3rds of free-fall acceleration, meaning that the structural integrity of the buildings was destroyed by means other than by the falling debris produced by building fires or the impact of an aicraft.
8. …that most all of the 100,000 tons of steel in each tower was displaced laterally at 80mph, landing up to 600 feet in every direction, so it was not available to crush the building below.
9. …that most all of the 90,000 tons of concrete in each tower was pulverized to a fine powder and distributed laterally from river to river across Lower Manhattan in a 3" thick blanket, meaning that it was unavailable to crush the building beneath it.
10. …that the US Geological survey and RJ Lee both independently confirm the discovery of what amounts to about 4 tons of previously molten iron microspheres in the WTC dust samples, indicating temperatures exceeding 2,800º F — and they don't know where they could have possibly come from.
And, a bonus fact:
11. …that a team of 8 international scientists discovered what amounted to several tons of high-tech nano-thermite in the WTC dust samples, in the form of small red-gray chips that produce molten iron microspheres after ignition in a DSC at 850º F, with the same chemical signature as the iron microspheres discovered by the USGS.
Now, what are those facts?
1. …that the third Tower, 47-story WTC Building 7, not hit by a plane, collapsed at 5:20pm on 9/11.
2. …that Building 7 fell at free-fall acceleration, which means that not one of its 81 columns gave any resistance. Where did they go?
3. …that Building 7 fell symmetrically — in the exact manner of a classic controlled demolition.
4. …that molten iron, the byproduct of the incendiary thermite, was found by first responders in pools throughout the debris pile of all 3 towers, and pouring out of the South Tower minutes prior to its collapse.
5. …that witnesses heard and felt explosions prior to the collapse of Building 7.
6. …that 186 First Responders were recorded hearing, seeing, feeling, explosions as well as flashes of light prior to the "collapses" of the Twin Towers.
7. …that the Twin Towers came down in 2/3rds of free-fall acceleration, meaning that the structural integrity of the buildings was destroyed by means other than by the falling debris produced by building fires or the impact of an aicraft.
8. …that most all of the 100,000 tons of steel in each tower was displaced laterally at 80mph, landing up to 600 feet in every direction, so it was not available to crush the building below.
9. …that most all of the 90,000 tons of concrete in each tower was pulverized to a fine powder and distributed laterally from river to river across Lower Manhattan in a 3" thick blanket, meaning that it was unavailable to crush the building beneath it.
10. …that the US Geological survey and RJ Lee both independently confirm the discovery of what amounts to about 4 tons of previously molten iron microspheres in the WTC dust samples, indicating temperatures exceeding 2,800º F — and they don't know where they could have possibly come from.
And, a bonus fact:
11. …that a team of 8 international scientists discovered what amounted to several tons of high-tech nano-thermite in the WTC dust samples, in the form of small red-gray chips that produce molten iron microspheres after ignition in a DSC at 850º F, with the same chemical signature as the iron microspheres discovered by the USGS.
12. And Here's Larry Silverstein, owner of WTC Building 7, explaining how that building was brought down with explosives on 9/11, except he doesn't say how that was arranged at a moment's notice. Which is not surprising, since it could not have been. Meaning that WTC7 had been prepped for demolition before 9/11. And if WTC7 had been prepped for demolition before 9/11, then so also could have been WTC Trade Center Towers 1 and 2.
Sunday, August 25, 2024
Starmer's Britain: An Anti-White, Anti-Christian Tyranny
By Vince Coyner
At the same time, London has become a killing ground for knife attacks, the overwhelming number being committed by minorities. Indeed, the country has become beset with machete attacks, a crime that was historically unheard of in Britain but which is common in the third world.
In July, the 17-year-old son of Rwandan immigrants knifed ten little girls, killing three of them. With the government withholding information on the killer, online posts asserted he was an immigrant. Tensions rose, and, across the UK, Brits protested the unfettered invasion of immigrants, the violence being perpetrated by immigrants and Muslims, and the system’s seeming duplicitous, two-tiered approach to justice when it came to immigrants and Muslims vs. white Brits, all of whom the government and the state-run media invariably characterize as “far right.”
These protests drew the new Labour government’s ire, and it launched a wave of arrests and a propaganda campaign against the “far right” anti-immigration “racists.” People were sentenced to prison for chanting “who the f*** is Allah” (although they were neither violent nor making threats), shouting “You’re not English anymore” at the police, or selling stickers that say “It’s OK to be white.”
Seeking to curtail what it claims is misinformation and incitement, the government warned the British citizenry, “You may be committing a crime if you repost, repeat or amplify a message which is false, threatening, or stirs up racial / religious hatred.” They also warned potential anti-immigration protesters, “We’re watching you.”
So basically, the government decides what’s false, threatening, or hate speech, and if you post anything about it online, you could end up in jail. And if threatening Brits’ freedom of speech wasn’t enough, the government threatened online platforms (and Musk) if they allowed prohibited speech.
Nor did the government stop there. It promised to extradite citizens of other countries if they engage in such prohibited online speech, even if not in Britain at the time. And because there’s not enough room in British jails to hold all of these anti-immigration “racists,” the government plans to release 5,000 criminals from jail to make room for those guilty of “wrongthink.”
While the Tories are responsible for the unfettered immigration over the last one-and-a-half decades, July’s election, which put Labour in power, represented a leap in transforming Britain into a tyranny. A free Britain, which took over 1,000 years to evolve, essentially became a Stalinist police state in less than two months.
While Britain is not the United States, our shared history, language, and similar cultural and political trajectory over the last 20 years suggests that what is happening there could easily happen here. Contrast the kid glove treatment given the 2020 BLM / Antifa rioters with the draconian treatment J6ers received, recall Democrats’ ill-fated Disinformation Governance Board, and look at what’s been done to Donald Trump and you see the writing on the wall as we head down that dark authoritarian path.
Like Turkey and Venezuela before it, Britain demonstrates that a single election can make the difference between freedom and tyranny. As we approach November 5th, we just might want to take note…
Follow Vince on Twitter at ImperfectUSA
BRITISH TYRANNY: Police Raid and Arrest 11-Year-Old Child For Attending Recent Anti-Immigration Protest
“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction”—Ronald Reagan
When I grew up, Great Britain was exotic. There were the red telephone booths, Buckingham Palace, black cabs, and, of course, the Bobbies (police) and the Beefeaters. England was the land of Shakespeare, Queen Elizabeth I, and Henry IV. For me, Britain was history incarnate.
Obviously, part of that comes from the fact that, as Americans, we share a great deal of history with the British. Not only did we split from Britain in 1776, but our history continued to stay close until modern times…from the US joining Britain in the fight to end slavery to fighting two world wars together to the British Invasion in the 1960s that brought us the Beatles, the Rolling Stones, and the Kinks.
Modern England largely dates back to 1066, when William the Conqueror crossed the English Channel and put the finishing touches on a unification that had been evolving since the Romans abandoned the island in 410 AD. The 1,000-year span since has seen Britain, like the rest of the world, evolve—always, however haltingly, in the direction of freedom. This journey began with the Magna Carta, agreed to by King John in 1215. A watershed event in Western culture, it limited the King’s powers and declared he was subject to the law, guaranteed church rights, access to an impartial system of justice, and limited taxes.
Although the Magna Carta would have a rough beginning, it was an enormous step in the drive towards liberty. The document would set the stage for Parliament to evolve from councils that advised the King into a representative body that began taking a more active and powerful role in governing.
It was just the first in a line of steps that would make Britain the freest nation on the planet for centuries. The Habeas Corpus Act of 1679 would guarantee the right to trial and demand the state show cause for holding someone. A decade later, the English Bill of Rights would set out Parliamentary rights, the right to petition the king, and the freedom from cruel and unusual punishment.
Over subsequent centuries, the British commitment to freedom would expand, eventually including all her citizens, not just the barons who first held King John’s feet to the fire.
Over that march to freedom, England would produce an extraordinary array of freedom advocates, some of whom inspired our Founding Fathers. Men such as John Locke, Edmund Burke and, later, William Wilberforce, the man who led the fight against the slave trade. It is this incessant march towards freedom that has always given England an aura of consequence that few other nations share.
And that’s what makes today’s Britain so sad.
The genesis of today’s dystopia began almost three decades ago when immigration took off in the late 1990s and early 2000s. The number of non-EU immigrants averaged over 200,000 per year for a decade and then skyrocketed after 2020. A nation of 55 million in 2000 is today over 65 million, with almost all of that growth coming from immigration, a majority from non-EU nations, particularly from the Middle East and Africa, countries that don’t share British culture or, importantly, religion. (It’s also likely that many of the ostensibly EU immigrants originated in non-EU countries.)
As a consequence, London, home to 20% of England’s population, has gone from approximately 80% native white British in 1991 to approximately 36% in 2021. The native population has surely shrunk more since then.
The result of this transformation of Britain from a largely British nation to something else has been monstrous. Possibly the single most despicable example is the 20-plus-year Rotherham child rape scandal that saw hundreds of Pakistani Muslims rape over a thousand British girls right under the noses of police who did nothing for fear of being called racists. As if that wasn’t bad enough, those who dared report on the various trials—see, e.g., here and here—found themselves jailed for doing so.
At the same time, London has become a killing ground for knife attacks, the overwhelming number being committed by minorities. Indeed, the country has become beset with machete attacks, a crime that was historically unheard of in Britain but which is common in the third world.
In July, the 17-year-old son of Rwandan immigrants knifed ten little girls, killing three of them. With the government withholding information on the killer, online posts asserted he was an immigrant. Tensions rose, and, across the UK, Brits protested the unfettered invasion of immigrants, the violence being perpetrated by immigrants and Muslims, and the system’s seeming duplicitous, two-tiered approach to justice when it came to immigrants and Muslims vs. white Brits, all of whom the government and the state-run media invariably characterize as “far right.”
These protests drew the new Labour government’s ire, and it launched a wave of arrests and a propaganda campaign against the “far right” anti-immigration “racists.” People were sentenced to prison for chanting “who the f*** is Allah” (although they were neither violent nor making threats), shouting “You’re not English anymore” at the police, or selling stickers that say “It’s OK to be white.”
Seeking to curtail what it claims is misinformation and incitement, the government warned the British citizenry, “You may be committing a crime if you repost, repeat or amplify a message which is false, threatening, or stirs up racial / religious hatred.” They also warned potential anti-immigration protesters, “We’re watching you.”
So basically, the government decides what’s false, threatening, or hate speech, and if you post anything about it online, you could end up in jail. And if threatening Brits’ freedom of speech wasn’t enough, the government threatened online platforms (and Musk) if they allowed prohibited speech.
Nor did the government stop there. It promised to extradite citizens of other countries if they engage in such prohibited online speech, even if not in Britain at the time. And because there’s not enough room in British jails to hold all of these anti-immigration “racists,” the government plans to release 5,000 criminals from jail to make room for those guilty of “wrongthink.”
While the Tories are responsible for the unfettered immigration over the last one-and-a-half decades, July’s election, which put Labour in power, represented a leap in transforming Britain into a tyranny. A free Britain, which took over 1,000 years to evolve, essentially became a Stalinist police state in less than two months.
While Britain is not the United States, our shared history, language, and similar cultural and political trajectory over the last 20 years suggests that what is happening there could easily happen here. Contrast the kid glove treatment given the 2020 BLM / Antifa rioters with the draconian treatment J6ers received, recall Democrats’ ill-fated Disinformation Governance Board, and look at what’s been done to Donald Trump and you see the writing on the wall as we head down that dark authoritarian path.
Like Turkey and Venezuela before it, Britain demonstrates that a single election can make the difference between freedom and tyranny. As we approach November 5th, we just might want to take note…
Follow Vince on Twitter at ImperfectUSA
BRITISH TYRANNY: Police Raid and Arrest 11-Year-Old Child For Attending Recent Anti-Immigration Protest
Friday, August 23, 2024
Tuesday, August 20, 2024
Amazing Trump:Harris Debate
In voice, vocabulary and verbal diarrhea, the Trump guy's impersonation is superb.
Beside being much better looking than the original, the Harris woman's script perfectly reflects the Harris policy drivel.
Sunday, August 18, 2024
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)