Monday, November 15, 2021
Jordan Peterson to Justin Trudeau: "I Got the Vaccine, Now You Fucking Leave Me Alone"
Friday, November 12, 2021
Covid Vaccination to Promote the Spread
Wednesday, November 10, 2021
The Definition of a Vaccine (New World Ordure Dictionary)
Vaccine, n.
An untested substance which:has already killed and injured hundreds of thousands;
fails to prevent either infection or transmission of a virus posing no mortal threat to 99.75% of the population;
Get the shot now or live in endless misery, denied the right to work, to travel, or to mix with your fellow human beings except with your face covered like that of an obedient Muslim woman.
Monday, November 8, 2021
Is There a Camel In Your Future?
And his reply was, “Hard times create strong men, strong men create easy times. Easy times create weak men, weak men create difficult times.
Many will not understand it, but you have to raise warriors, not parasites." And add to that the historical reality that all great empires...the Persians, the Trojans, the Egyptians, the Greeks, the Romans, and in later years, the British...all rose and perished within 240 years.
They were not conquered by external enemies; they rotted from within. America has now passed that 240 year mark, and the rot is starting to be visible and is accelerating. We are past the Mercedes and Land Rover Years….the camels are on the horizon.
The greatest generation consisted of 18 year old kids storming the beaches at Normandy. And now, two generations later, some 18-year-old kids want to hide in safe rooms when they hear words that hurt their feelings. They also want free stuff from the government because they think they are entitled to it.
The "camels are on the horizon" for sure.
Sunday, November 7, 2021
Covid Hoaxsters, No. 79: UK's National Health Service Boss and Liar-in-Chief, Amanda Prichard
"There is no doubt that the NHS is running hot and there are some very real pressures on health and social care. We have had 14 times the number of people in hospital with COVID-19 than we saw this time last year."Needless to say, this was faithfully reported by various media outlets. For instance, ITV News ran a story on it headlined: “Hospital Covid admissions 14 times higher than this time in 2020.”
There was only one problem: it isn’t true. The number of COVID-19 patients currently in English hospitals is 7,510 according to the Government’s Coronavirus Dashboard, whereas the number in November 2020 was over 11,000.
But for even more shocking proof of official Covid lies, see this:
For Whom Do The COVID "Fact-Checkers" Really Work?
Naturally-Acquired Immunity Versus Vaccine-Acquired Immunity
MIT Scientist and Professor on Exposing COVID-19 Vaccine Injuries: “You Have to be Careful Because You Could be Eliminated”
Why QE II Will Be the Last British Monarch
In recent times, the British monarchy has served more than one useful purposes.
Most importantly it has kept clowns like Boris Johnson and egomaniacs like Phony Blair from occupying the palace, which they might very well have turned into a brothel or a venue for pop concerts. Furthermore, the Monarchy prevents such oafs and fantasists as these from heading either the armed forces or the Church of England, in which capacities they would be capable of untold harm. As it is, the harm that they can do in the military or religious sphere is limited to what they can persuade the Monarch to give consent.
In addition to these restraints on the political powers that be, the Monarchy has another and more important role, which is to serve as a bastion of the British Constitution. The Monarch has this role by virtue of the fact that whatever Britain`s Parliament seeks to enact, becomes law only with the Monarch's approval.
True, the British Monarch has given the nod to every act of Parliament since Queen Anne refused assent to the Scottish Militia Bill in the year 1708. Still the power of the Monarch to refuse passage of an act of Parliament exists and must exert a modicum of restraint on Parliament.
As is well known, Britain's constitution is unwritten and thus not generally well understood. It's essence, however, was defined by Robert Arthur Talbot Gascoyne-Cecil, 3rd marquess of Salisbury and three-times British Prime Minister during the late Nineteenth Century. It was Lord Salisbury's considered opinion that any action by Parliament that is strongly opposed by a majority of the people constitutes a breach of the Constitution. In the event that a government pursued such action, it would thus be the responsibility of the Monarch to reject the enabling legislation.
But the Monarch would be successful in applying such restraint on the action of Parliament only if known for political neutrality and fairness of judgement, which is to say a monarch trusted by a large majority of the people. Without the authority granted by the public will, the power of the Monarch over Parliament is void. Moreover, such general public approval will never be earned by a politically active monarch. Yet, disastrously, since the death of the Duke of Edinburgh, Britain`s Royal Family has turned highly and controversially political.
Only the other day, the Queen lectured heads of state gathered in Glasgow on their responsibilities, while jet-setting Prince Charles yammers endlessly (and here, and here and etc.) about "setting ourselves on a new and more sustainable course" (i.e., a less carbon intensive and generally lower standard of living, himself and his Davos friends excepted, naturally). Meantime, Meg and Prince Harry push the same message as they jet private in pursuit of pleasure, profit, privilege, public adulation, and political influence.
Prince William, it is true, has thus far demonstrated some self-control over the expression of his political opinions* and has even taken cheap commercial flights along with the hoi polloi. But for all the sense that he and Princess Catherine can muster, his chance at the monarchy is surely doomed by his father's inane political interventionism.
Thus the only sensible course for the Brits is to jettison the monarchy, something that the sovereign nation state of Barbados is doing this month. Out of respect for the lifelong service of Her Majesty the Queen, the transition should be deferred until the reign of QEII reaches its natural end. But the time to plan the transition is now.
With an end to monarchy, the assets of the Monarch, vast land holdings, the Crown Jewels and much else, must be nationalized. At the same time, the role of Head of State must be transferred to an appointed President who will be selected by the Government as is the practice in Canada, Australia and several other countries, including the nation of Tuvalu (Pop. 11,646).
The transition from Monarchy to Constitutional Republic will give formal recognition to the end of England's age of greatness neatly book-ended by the Queens Elizabeth. Marking this transition by an end to the Monarchy will help concentrate minds on the question of where Britain's future is to lie.
_________________________________
* Sadly, William has now flunked the test of political neutrality with his recent statement that "The increasing pressure on Africa’s wildlife and wild spaces as a result of human population presents a huge challenge for conservationists, as it does the world over,” a clear expression of preference for animals over black people. True, Africa's ongoing population explosion is a matter for widespread concern. But it is not for the heir to the British throne to raise the issue.
Related:
Maxime Bernier: Should Canada leave the Monarchy behind?PETER HITCHENS: Our Green Queen has just made a terrible mistake by taking a side in politics
Saturday, November 6, 2021
Is Ivermectin plus doxycycline Better than Pfizer's Seven-Hundred-Dollar Covid Pill?
This report on an Australian trial with 600 PCR positive Covid cases indicates that ivermectin with doxycycline reduced mortality in Covid patients by 92.9%.
Will that report pass peer review? Will the result be replicated in further trials?
Meantime, Pfizer claims less than 90% reduction in hospitalization and death for its seven-hundred-dollar pill.
Related:
Pfizer “vaccine” may kill 200 kids to ‘save’ one?Friday, November 5, 2021
The Covid Hoax: Italy Cuts Official Death Toll by 97%
Remember early 2020, when the virus that had the Chinese dropping and twitching in the streets went global, causing mass death and hospital chaos in Northern Italy and worldwide panic, with folks locked-down, and in China even welded, in their homes to stop the spread.
Well it was all lies.
Of the mass Covid deaths reported in Italy, 97%, Italy's Institute of Health now reports (and here), were "with Covid" not "by Covid".
But the waves? What about the waves? The multiple epidemic waves?
All rubbish. Epidemic pathogens don't do waves. Waves are the creation of bogus PCR tests and lockdowns that promoted household transmission of the synthetic Corona virus (that is, a virus of the common cold family) of limited virulence.
But in that case, why?
Hysteria?
Hysteria of the political class?
For sure, they're mostly brain dead, clowns or wannabe dictators: President Brandon, BoJo, Justin Trudeau, New Zeland's zero-Covid fanatic, and the inimitable, no longer New South Wales Premier, Gladys Berejiklian.
But there's been one absolutely consistent theme: Get The Vax.
No Vax no job, no rights, just stay quarantined at home forever and die for lack of food for all Gnome Chomsky or anyone in government cares.
But why the Vax?
To save your life.
Save it from what? A virus that didn't kill almost one hundred thousand Italians, but just 3000 -- fewer than typically die from the flu each year?
A vax that doesn't stop the spread — it clearly promotes the spread (see Table 2 on Page 13, of this UK Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report, Week 42)?
Surely, it has to be the Vax: the vax with the spike protein that can enter the nucleus of any cell, liver, brain, skin, testicle or ovary, and disrupt the the machinery of DNA damage repair.
That's the machinery that prevents your genetic blueprint from getting scrambled. Once that's disrupted, expect trouble. Big trouble: every conceivable metabolic disease, plus cancer and sterility.
Yes, well, as Prince Charles, Britain's leading politician, reiterated among his jet-setting friends at COP26 (aka Cut Our Population), we have to place ourselves (i.e., you, not my jet-setting friends) on a lower and more sustainable course.
How?
Have lot fewer of you, obviously.
Could we then already be on that "more sustainable" course, embarked now, thanks to the vax, on a great dying?
Related:
More than 38 million people worldwide have been infected with the coronavirus, and as of Monday (i.e., October 12, 2020), fewer than five of those cases have been confirmed by scientists to be reinfections.
Thursday, November 4, 2021
How Biden and the Democrats Are Committing Political Suicide: Well Done Brandon!
Voters are moved by things that affect them personally more than anything else. “It’s the economy, stupid” was a slogan that was invented by Clinton campaign strategist James Carville all the way back in 1992. If people believe that voting for a particular political party is going to improve their ability to make a living, that political party is going to get a lot of votes. Alternatively, if people believe that voting for a particular political party is going to hurt their ability to make a living, that political party is going to lose a lot of votes.
Joe Biden made a catastrophic political error when he went after people’s jobs. Countless Americans have already lost jobs due to various mandates, and approximately 80 million American workers will be covered by the big OSHA mandate that is about to go into effect.
Wednesday, November 3, 2021
SARS–CoV–2 Spike Protein Impairs DNA Damage Repair — Or How Covid-19 Was Designed to Kill You?
Here's the paper in the journal Viruses:
SARS–CoV–2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair ...1. Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner–Gren Institute, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
2. Department of Clinical Microbiology, Virology, UmeĂ¥ University, SE-90185 UmeĂ¥, Sweden
PROFS: MARTIN KULLDORFF AND JAY BHATTACHARYA: How Fauci Fooled America:
mRNA Vaccines Raise the Spontaneous Abortion Rate 7- to 8-fold
Here's the paper: Spontaneous Abortions and Policies on COVID-19mRNA Vaccine Use During Pregnancy, which refutes CDC-sponsored lies published earlier this year.
Monday, November 1, 2021
Billionaire Hypocrisy Watch: Headline of the Week
Saturday, October 30, 2021
Are We Governed By Imbeciles or Criminals?
Increasingly, politicians and medical bureaucrats are entranced by a bizarre pandemic ideology. Like most ideologies, it remains oblivious to evidence and argument, holding that the risk of severe outcomes from Corona infection is far more evenly distributed across the population than it is; and allowing only universal solutions, such as quarantining and vaccinating entire populations. These obtuse views, which just won’t go away, are at the root of our failed and destructive policies. For 20 months now, this pandemic ideology has blinded everyone in charge to the possibility of shielding the vulnerable, leveraging seasonal patterns in infection, and leaving the kids alone. The stratified nature of Corona risk is the key to unravelling the pandemic, and it’s the one thing nobody will recognise.
Covidiocy, or the Drive to jab Everyone
British Medical Journal:
Vaccinating people who have had covid-19: why doesn’t natural immunity count in the US?
By Jennifer BlockWhen the vaccine rollout began in mid-December 2020, more than one quarter of Americans—91 million—had been infected with SARS-CoV-2, according to a US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimate.1 As of this May, that proportion had risen to more than a third of the population, including 44% of adults aged 18-59 (table 1).
Table 1
Estimated total infections in the United States between February 2020 and May 2021*
Age group (years) | No of infections (millions) (95% uncertainty interval) | Population in 2019 (millions) | % previously infected (95% uncertainty interval) |
---|---|---|---|
0-17 | 26.8 (22 to 33.1) | 73 | 37 (30 to 45) |
18-49 | 60.5 (50.4 to 73.2) | 138 | 44% (36 to 53) |
50-64 | 20.4 (17.0 to 24.6) | 63 | 32% (27 to 39) |
65+ | 12.3 (9.9 to 15.5) | 54 | 23% (18 to 29) |
All ages | 120.3 (103.3 to 140.9) | 328 | 37% (31 to 43) |
Read more
Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections
"Conclusions This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity. ..."
Friday, October 29, 2021
Lancet Study: Vaccination Doesn't Prevent Covid Infection or Transmission: So What, Again, Is the Point of Vaccine Passports?
A report in the current issue of the Lancet demonstrates that those vaccinated against the Covid-19 virus (SARS-COV2) are not only highly susceptible to infection, but carry as high a viral load as the unvaccinated and are likely to spread the virus to other members of their household. Moreover, vaccinated individuals are only marginally less susceptible to infection within the household than unvaccinated individuals.
The study did not address the question of susceptibility to transmission of those with immunity from a past Covid-19 infection, which is understandable since to do so would have negative implications for the drive for universal vaccination. As it is, the billion or so Covid recovereds World-wide represent a huge target that the vax vendors will make every effort to see jabbed. This they will do regardless of whether the benefit exceeds the cost, either financial or as measured by adverse events including the possibility of many thousands of vaccine-caused deaths.
Related:Meg and Harry gonna end the pandemic all by themselves
US Catholic Archbishop Condemns Covid jab: Warns Globalists want ‘billions of chronically ill people’
The silence of so many cardinals and bishops, along with the inconceivable promotion of the vaccination campaign by the Holy See, represents a form of unprecedented complicity that cannot continue any longer. It is necessary to denounce this scandal, this crime against humanity, this satanic action against God.
With every passing day, thousands of people are dying or are being affected in their health by the illusion that the so-called vaccines guarantee a solution to the pandemic emergency. The Catholic Church has the duty before God and all of humanity to denounce this tremendous and horrible crime with the utmost firmness, giving clear directions and taking a stand against those who, in the name of a pseudo-science subservient to the interests of the pharmaceutical companies and the globalist elite, have only intentions of death. How Joe Biden, who also defines himself as “Catholic,” could impose vaccination on 28 million children aged 5 to 11,[30] is absolutely inconceivable, if only for the fact that there is practically zero risk of them developing the SARS-CoV-2 disease. The Holy See and the Bishops’ Conferences have the duty to express a firm condemnation in this regard, and also in relation to the very serious side effects that can result for children who are inoculated with the experimental gene serum.[31]
Related:
Tuesday, October 26, 2021
Why the US Center for Disease Control Is Lying About Natural Covid Immunity
Source Michael Leunig, creator of this cartoon illustrating the plight of the unvaxxed, has been axed from his prime spot in The Age newspaper |
By Aaron Kheriaty
Human Flourishing, October 23, 2021: The science on the efficacy and durability of natural immunity is now overwhelming. Yet the CDC continues to recommend lifting restrictions on the vaccinated but not those who have recovered from Covid and have superior natural immunity. Vaccine mandates across the country likewise ignore natural immunity simply because the CDC is ignoring it. Those promulgating vaccine mandates feel no need to actually address the science on this question; instead, they simply fall back on the CDC’s recommendation that everyone—regardless of immunity status—get vaccinated.There are many political reasons the CDC continues to ignore the scientific evidence on this issue. Here is a sampling of of these reasons, which are neither compelling nor grounded in scientific findings:
Public health officials worry that acknowledging natural immunity will lead people to deliberately try to get infected with Covid rather than getting vaccinated. The obvious response to this worry is that the natural immunity question is not about whether people should try to acquire natural immunity by deliberately getting infected; nobody is suggesting this. It is about the level of immunity afforded to those who have already recovered from Covid as compared to immunity from the vaccine.
Public health officials worry that establishing whether a potential vaccine recipient has already had Covid is too inefficient and cumbersome: officials downplay anything that might slow the efficiency of vaccination campaigns or complicate the simplistic “needle in every arm” public messaging. The response to this worry is likewise straightforward. Vaccination centers need not take on the burden of testing prior to vaccination; simply place the burden of proof on the vaccine recipients. Some people with prior infection may still want the vaccine; as long as they are provided accurate information regarding risks and benefits of vaccines in this population, they are free to get vaccinated. For those with natural immunity who consider their individual risks and benefits and decide to decline vaccination, policies can specify that it’s their responsibility to establish prior immunity. Simply provide the option to them of presenting previous positive PCR test results, or obtaining antibody testing or a T-cell test (which remains positive after antibodies inevitably decline). While there are many other problems with vaccine passports, if officials insist upon them, at the very least these should be immunity passports rather than vaccine passports: this model has has already been implemented in several European countries.
Public health officials worry that acknowledging natural immunity will amount to admitting the failure of their prior policies, which were implemented to slow or halt the spread of the virus. The two most basic numbers in immunology are incidence and prevalence: the former designates the rate of new cases over a given period of time, whereas the latter designates the rate of overall cases for a given period of time. Once the CDC acknowledges natural immunity, the obvious question is then about prevalence: how many Americans have already been infected with Covid since the pandemic began? That 20 months into the pandemic we don’t have an answer to this most basic question is astonishing, since it could easily be answered by randomly sampled population-based T-cell testing, or antibody testing sampled sequentially in a cohort every few months. If the CDC got back to epidemiological basics and finally did these essential studies, most scientists estimate that somewhere between 50% and 60% of the population will turn out to have natural immunity, including many who were vaccinated (which artificially elevates estimates of vaccine efficacy, by the way). In the mind of officials who never want to admit that they may have been wrong, this will suggest that—despite draconian lockdowns, social distancing, masking, scrubbing of surfaces, etc.—the virus nevertheless did what viruses do: over half of Americans got infected anyways. Self-interested public health agencies will see this as bad news. (The silver lining is that, of this huge number of people who have been infected with Covid, 99.8% will have survived, including 99.9996% of those under 50.)
There are other political and financial considerations unduly influencing public policy agencies like the CDC on Covid policies, which I will explore in later posts. Against these non-scientific roadblocks, which have little to do with public health and sound policymaking, how can responsible scientists help move the needle on the CDC’s position? Can legal pressure be applied to require the CDC—in an open and publicly transparent manner—to examine the science on natural immunity and give credible reasons for their policies on this issue?
In fact, precisely such legal pressure is already being applied, by a group of academic physicians and researchers (including yours truly) with the help of my team of lawyers at Siri & Glimstad. In my next post for subscribers, I will recount what has transpired with these efforts over the last several months and bring you up-to-date on where we are going next. This next post will also include links to the best summaries on the science of natural immunity, which we have submitted to the CDC. Stay tuned, and if you have not yet done so, consider subscribing for access.
Related:
FDA Adviser Explains Why He Abstained From Vote on Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine for Young Children The abstainer, Dr. Michael Kurilla, explained his abstension saying “A ‘no’ vote would have been misconstrued as my opinion about the vaccine”.