How the Banks Rob Your Savings of Value by Printing Money and Creating the Inflation that Drives Up Housing Costs that Force Millions Into Debt Slavery

The end of democracy and the defeat of the American Revolution will occur when government falls into the hands of lending institutions and moneyed incorporations.  Thomas Jefferson

Banks create money out of thin air by creating loans.

You get a mortgage for, say, half a million, and the bank adds $500,000.00 to the balance in your account. Where'd that money come from? Nowhere. The bank just created it with a book-keeping entry, and now it's charging you interest on the strength of that book-keeping entry. Let the banks keep creating their own money and soon you've got real inflation.

From the graph below, you can see that the Canadian money supply has grown at the rate of around 7.5% a year for the last 30 years. The Canadian economy, however, has grown at the rate of only around 2.5% a year. So monetary inflation has exceeded economic growth by about 5% a year, meaning, very roughly and ignoring many complications, that what cost a dollar in 1990 will cost around four dollars today.

Image Source

Good business, banking, innit. Create money at no cost and lend it to the suckers at interest. The suckers spend the money, thereby driving up prices, which creates the need for more borrowing, so more money creation and ever bigger bank profits.

Muslim Congresswoman who called Trump "the Motherfucker" is no MILF

Just hours after being sworn in, Democratic Michigan Rep. Rashida Tlaib promised to go after President Trump, telling a group of left-wing supporters at a rally held by MoveOn near Capitol Hill, she would help Democrats “impeach the motherfucker.”

Source

Related:

CanSpeccy: Once You Let the Alien In, He'll Seek to Take Control

Why the Diversity Cucks and Death-to-the-Nation Globalists Are Headed for the Trash Heap of History

As Thereason May, the fake Brexiteer, and leading British war criminal, Phony Blair, strive to keep Britain chained to the Yellow-Vest-infested European Disunion, Theodore Beale explains why it's game over for the diversity cucks and globalist con-men.

Once you figure out that the other side really, genuinely, and truly wants to destroy your religion and your race, only the suicidal and the delusional will persist in trying to "come together" and seek to "discuss our differences". You can brag about being anti-racist, apolitical, post-ideological, colorblind, or even apathetic all you like, but once it finally registers that the other side is literally hell-bent on destroying everything and everyone you value, it's no longer possible to continue lying to yourself. I saw this in a microcosm in my interview with Bleeding Cool editor-in-chief Mark Siefert. He simply could not, and would not, believe what I was telling him about the SJWs in comics. He insisted that there must be a place at the table for everyone, that it didn't have to be war to the knife. I assured him that he was wrong, and that the SJWs could not be reasoned with, and the next day, he discovered the truth when he was ejected from his position by the very SJWs he'd been defending as reasonable the day before. The cuckspace is shrinking. The middle ground is rapidly vanishing and nothing is going to bring it back. There is nothing to bring it back, because diversity is, quite literally, disintegration. It won't be long before those who believed they were morally superior for denouncing nationalists as fascists and Nazis will be crying for those nationalists to save them... if they are not proclaiming themselves to have been nationalists all along. The real lesson of the Spanish Civil War is this: you will not save your nation without fighting for it. Source

Wikipedia, Trikipedia: The Great Misinfopedia

What Wikipedia doesn't tell you:

On the downing of Malaysia Airways Flight MH17:

Wikipedia's account
Another account that Wikipedia doesn't mention

Or on 9/11:

Wikipedia's account
The Account by Architechts and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Transgender Rights = Civil Rights for Mental Illness

Proof That the Lunatics Have Taken Over the Insane Asylum, aka the American University

The University of Michigan Has At Least 82 Full-Time Diversity Officers at a Total Annual Payroll Cost of $10.6M.

Here`s the list.

Source. 

Related: 

CanSpeccy: The Rot at the Head of the University

The Return of Louis XVI: Emmanuel Macron, Roi de L’Ancien Regime

Martin Sieff

Strategic Culture Foundation, December 29, 2018: It is easy to imagine ridiculous young President Emmanuel Macron of France as his fellow-free trading liberal King Louis XVI. Macron’s extraordinary pretensions to regal “dignity” and to god-like authority, far from elevating him have stripped him of all the bogus credibility that the corrupt, servile and stupid mainstream media of Europe and the United States tried to give him.

Far from raising the embattled Fifth Republic to new heights of achievement and success, it is already clear that Le Jeune Macron is destroying it. The contrast with the founder of the Republic, the great and truly regal Charles de Gaulle could not be greater.

Read more

Once You Let the Alien In, He'll Seek to Take Control

Thereason May's Home Secretary, the Muslim, Savid Javid, son of Pakistani immigrants, and a man with a good chance of becoming Britain's next Prime Minister, makes it clear that Brexit does not mean and end to the open door for Muslims settlers in Britain, even though, according to former Prime Minister David Cameron, the reason the Brits voted for Brexit was to end mass immigration.



And here's the "Justice Minister" in the government of former Treason Party Prime Minister Tony Bliar demanding a Muslim Prime Minister for Britain.


Meantime, Angela Merkel, the former East German Communist, declares that the nation states must give up their sovereignty, meaning that Europe must open its border and be inundated by immigration without end.

European Union Idiocy: EU Parliament urges MEPs to say "Humanity" not "Mankind"

Officials and members in the parliament have been sent guidebooks on using gender-neutral language in all of their official EU-related work and communications, the Telegraph reported on Thursday. Under the new guidelines, European lawmakers will be strongly encouraged to say “chair” instead of “chairman”, “artificial” instead of “man-made”, and “humanity” instead of “mankind.”RT

Idiots.

man·kind
noun
1. human beings considered collectively; the human race.

hu·man·i·ty
noun
1. the human race; human beings collectively.

Both words include the three letter word "man" both refer to the same thing, the huMAN species.

But according to "officials and member so the EU Parliament," to speak of "humMANity" is OK, but to speak of MANkind is to use vile sexist language. Is that stupid, or what?

Actually it is quite correct to refer to humanity or mankind by the monsyllabic word "man". Man is the common name for the human species or Homo sapiens, which includes both males and females (Oops, what's the EU gonna do about that horrible sexist word feMALE?).

"HOMO," the genus to which the species man belongs, is the Latin word for "MAN," while "SAPIENS," the specific name assigned to the human species under the Linnaean system of classification is the Latin word for "WISE." Evidently the huMAN species was badly mislabelled by Carl Linnaeus, since far from being wise, we are clearly idiots, or at any rate led by idiots.

In fact, only a dim-witted and ignorant feminist cuck like Justin Trudeau could fail to see that the word MANkind refers to all huMANity:

which tells you how desperately Britain needs to get the Hell out the EU, and how urgently Canada needs a new Prime Minister.

Otherwise, Canadians are gonna have to start saying huPEOPLEity for huMANity and fePERSON for feMALE and woPERSON for woMAN, like the idiots they would be if the voted Trudeau into power again in 2019. And watch out with feperSON and woperSON, which under the tyrrany of idiot PC-dom will have to be replaced by feperDAUGHTER and woperDAUGHTER.

Christmas Travel in the Land of the Free

Crapademia, No. 79: The Higher Education System That Rates All Students Above Average

British university degree exam results are ranked on a six-point scale: First, Upper Second, Lower Second, Third, Pass and Fail. In my day, first class degrees were somewhat rare. In my class of over 100, just one first class degree was awarded (mine — to take this opportunity to boast of the fact, albeit anonymously). Of upper seconds, I recall only a couple. So the lower three grades accounted for well over 90% of the class (good folks, incidentally, one of whom was recently awarded a knighthood by her Majesty the Queen). Today, apparently, things are different, with 78% of British university students graduating with a first or upper second class degree.

What makes this vast improvement in university grades over a period of 50 years particularly remarkable is that, over that period of time, the proportion of the school-leaving population receiving a university education has increased from two or three percent to probably more than half today. In other words, the majority of students, including a substantial number who must as a matter of logical necessity be of below average academic ability, are being graduated by the British universities as scholars of high academic standing. How can that be possible? It is an obvious absurdity beyond the comprehension, apparently, of our academic elite.

Apparently, some universities in Britain have attempted to deal with grade inflation by creating a new grade above First Class, namely First Class Starred. But why only one star? Why not have five classes denoted by one to five stars, while dropping the traditional classification with its weird segregation of the second class into uppers and lowers, thereby, presumably, to save the lowers from the humiliation of being classified as Third Class, while allowing those of the fourth class to pass for Third Class, and those of the Fifth Class to pass as having, well, just passed.

Whether new nomenclature would put an end to ludicrous grade inflation is open to question. However, it would certainly seem better to graduate with a single star than a mere pass, while two stars seems very promising compared with "a Third."

Related:

CanSpeccy: The Rot at the Head of the University

UK Ambassador Craig Murray: British Security Service Infiltration, the Integrity Initiative and the Institute for Statecraft

His crackpot opinions and obsessions aside, Craig Murray is among the most perceptive and well-informed critics of the deeply corrupt British state. In this piece he documents the fraudulence of Britain's supposedly democratic government, which deploys the security services to corrupt the so-called free press, thereby subjecting a supposedly free people to the will of the state.

Richard Feynman on Quantum Mechanics: Don't Even Try to Understand It

Gender Studies Versus Quantum Physics

Hearing Richard Feynman talking of quantum physics, I am reminded of his view that university degrees in some of the softer disciplines offered at the university, Home Economics for example, might not be fully equivalent in difficulty of attainment to degrees in, say mathematics or physics.

Today, most universities seem to have phased out Home Ec., but with the rise of Womens' Studies, Gender Studies and other "Studies" programs, universities now seem to offer even more soft options than in Feynman's day. That some of these programs are entirely vacuous is rather clearly demonstrated by this report on what passes for scholarship at the mushier edge of the academic community.

 

For those interested in deciding for themselves the validity of present-day academic research in the "gender studies" field, here's a link to one such contribution, as it happens a spoof paper, that was accepted and published in a peer-reviewed journal published by Springer, an old-established publisher of scholarly journals.

Another European Treason Party Leader Bites the Dust

Dispute over migration brings down Belgian government Belgium’s liberal prime minister Charles Michel has resigned in the wake of a bitter falling out with his erstwhile Flemish coalition partner. ... The [Flemish NVA] party objected to Mr Michel’s support for what it claimed was a legally binding UN compact on migration, which was approved at a summit of 180 states in Marrakesh last Monday. The Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration is a first attempt at the UN to agree a common global approach to migration but was seen by populists as too sympathetic to migrants. Bart de Wever, leader of the NVA and the mayor of Antwerp, attacked the compact which he claimed, although non-binding, “will serve as an argument in court”. The NVA ... argued that the compact would undermine the government’s tough stance against illegal migrants. The Irish Times

Naturally the UN wants open borders world-wide. Open borders will destroy the nation state and lead to the creation of a world empire under the control of the corrupt bureaucratic idiots who run the UN.

Fortunately, it ain't gonna happen. 

The more loudly the UN and it's Treason Party allies in the Western nations agitate for the Western nations to open their borders the poverty-stricken masses without, the more aware the people have become of the traitors within their ranks who smear opponents of national destruction as racist. 

What the gilets jaunes of France, the Flemish nationalists of Belgium, the Build-the-Wall Trumpsters, and indeed the great majority in every Western nation now see is that they have been targeted by the UN and their globalist allies for genocide both as racial groups and as distinct cultural entities with a unique history and religious tradition.  

What the people of the world's poorest nations need to demand is not that they be allowed to enter and impoverish the rich countries, but that their own lands, which possess vast natural resources be properly governed. Why, for example, should 400 million Latin Americans be granted the unrestricted freedom to migrate to North America when they have a continent of their own no more densely populated than North America and with natural wealth that is at least comparable. Ditto Africa, a continent of vast natural riches, three times the size of China with only two-thirds of China's population.

What's needed is not to diversify the successful countries with countless millions from failed states, but for the failed states to pay attention to the way the Western nations got rich, which was primarily through adherence to the rule of law, democracy, and market capitalism. The Latin American, African and Muslim states should boot their corrupt oligarchs and dictators and give the Western approach to government a try.

Related:

Is Trudeau next?

Globalist Elite to EuroAmerican White Trash

What this guy is not saying is:

(1) Migrants take below-minimum-wage jobs in the cash (untaxed) economy, which means bigger profits for son-of-a-bitch employers like me.

(2) In a World of seven billion mostly very poor people, there's a potential immigrant better qualified for almost every job in the UK, Canada and the rest of the developed world than the existing job holder — including mister Fat-Cat Son-of-a-Bitch himself.

(3) Or as Mr. Fat-Cat Son-of-a-Bitch is really saying:

"I don't give a shit about destroying the European peoples, as racial and cultural entities, I just want cheap labor, so fuck off you anti-immigrant racist."

Theresa May Got One Thing Right: Tony Blair Is An Interferring Jackass

In an astonishing broadside, [Theresa May] lashed out at her predecessor’s treacherous trip to meet EU chiefs in Brussels while Brexit talks were taking place. “For Tony Blair to go to Brussels and seek to undermine our negotiations by advocating for a second referendum is an insult to the office he once held and the British people he once served. “We cannot, as he would, abdicate responsibility for this decision. Parliament has a democratic duty to deliver what the British people voted for.” The Sun

May also "reminded Blair that it was his own open-door immigration policy which spurred millions of Britons to vote to leave the European Union." However, those for Brexit should never for a moment forget that May, hereself, is a Remainer and hence no opponent of of the EU's own open-door immigration policy, a policy now driving the EU into a state of internal strife and disintegration.

And writing in today's Daily Mail, former Finance Minister Lord Nigel Lawson writes of Blair:

A recent poll showed that only two per cent of the British population have a 'very favourable' opinion of Mr Blair. It is the sort of approval rating a mass-murderer might be expected to get — which happens to be how many members of his own party describe him, in the wake of the Iraq war. Daily Mail

Why Paris is Burning Down

Trump blames the Yellow Jacket riots in France on the Paris Agreement to Combat Climate Change, an international agreement mandating massive public expenditures to combat what are alleged to be climate-changing emissions of carbon dioxide.

But French generals beg to differ as to the cause of France's civil unrest, warning Macron that signing the UN Pact on Migration will be an act of treason.

Specifically, the generals state:

By deciding alone to sign this pact, you would add an additional reason for revolt to the anger of an already battered people. You would be guilty of a denial of democracy or treason against the nation.

What next? Will the generals place the traitor under arrest?

Meantime, the French police union has declared its solidarity with the gilets jaunes.



It's difficult to see how France can avoid a new revolution unless Macron, the former Rothschild banker and globalist stooge, is ousted without further delay.

As to the rest of the gang of globalist traitors, Merkel is heading out the door, Thereason May is on the ropes, and Trudeau's perpetual asininity will surely terminate his disaster- and humiliation-strewn reign when Canada votes next year.

But nationalists would be foolish to claim victory any time soon. All political parties in the West have been co-opted by the globalist Money Power, so whoever replaces the current batch of traitors is unlikely to undertake any meaningful change of direction unless subject to continual challenge.

Otherwise, the destruction of the Western nations as  cultural and racial entities will continue, with programs of suppressed reproduction combined with mass replacement immigration. Thus, in Canada, Trudeau, via the Canadian state broadcaster, the CBC, advocates for further reduction in the fertility of the already reproductively dysfunctional Canadian population, while calling for ever more rapid immigration. And in Britain, non-European immigration this year has reached a peak not seen since the days of the Traitor Tony Blair whose government accelerated non-European immigration to, so they said privately,  "rub the noses of the Right in multiculturalism," which is just another way of saying to destroy the British people and erase their cultural and religious traditions.

Meantime in South Africa the Rise of Good Racism:

If you don't believe our rulers support white genocide, just listen to the silence from May, Merkel, Micron and Trudeau among others about the call for white genocide in South Africa.

Related:

Daily Star: Yellow Vests in London

Scott Adams challenges Google to show that they have not maliciously, and criminally, targeted his reputation for destruction

The evidence: This Google image search "for Scott Adams". Donald Trump might issue the same challenge: see this Google image search for "idiot".

Google uses location data that puts entire ZIP codes in politically biased 'filter bubbles'

DuckDuckGo — a privacy-focused search engine company that competes with Google Search— released a study last week that claims Google is inadvertently introducing bias into its results.

"Google's collection and use of personal data, including location, which is then used to filter specific search results, is having an effect akin to the effects of a political bias," DuckDuckGo CEO Gabriel Weinberg told Business Insider on Tuesday.

The company's study found participants saw vast differences in search results when searching for the same keywords (like "gun control" or "immigration") from different locations across the country.

Full story

Why Islam Should Be Banned in the Western World

The Freedom and Direct Democracy party of the Czech Republic has called for a complete ban on Islam.

Speaking in the Czech Parliament, party member, Jiri Kobza, stated that Islam is a colonizing ideology that promotes violence and hatred.

That is the case. Muslims in Europe are settlers and colonizers who work with traitors in government such as Tony Blair, whose "Justice Minister" called for a British parliament solely of Muslims, Theresa May, an advocate for Sharia courts in Britain, and Justin Trudeau, a warm advocate for Canada's Islamists, including ISIS Jihadis.



Islam is not merely a religion. It is a political system that is incompatible with free society. As Winston Churchill stated:

The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.”

“Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyzes the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.

The spread of Islam to the Western nations represents and existential threat to free society and should be resisted by all means.

Meantime:

The European Court of Human Rights ruled that criticism of Muhammad constitutes incitement to hatred

But if you want to piss on Christ, no prob.

Related

Is the UK Ready for a Muslim Takeover Prime Minister

 

CanSpeccy: Are you a far-right-wing extremist, racist, anti-Semite against the genocide of your own race and nation?

Russia Insider: Yellow Vest Rising in Europe a US-Incited Color Revolution

Five Lies Sundar Pichai, the Shit CEO of Google Just Told

Google CEO Sundar Pichai testified on Tuesday before the House Judiciary Committee. Despite testifying under oath, Pichai’s statements were riddled with demonstrable falsehoods — here are some of Pichai’s biggest whoppers.

1. The Google CEO leads the company “without political bias”
2. Google did not try and turn out Latino voters in key states
3. Users can opt out of Google’s invasive tracking services
4. Google does not discriminate against competitors
5. Google has diverse perspectives

See the details here

Related:

Google CEO Gets Grilled During Congressional Hearing

Ding-Dong, the Witch Isn't Dead. May Lives to Ruin Brexit

By James Delingpole

Against all reason, Theresa May – the worst Prime Minister in British history – has yet again survived an attempt to boot her out of office.

This has nothing to do with her merits: she has none.

It is entirely due to the short-termism, cowardice and depressing lack of soundness among all those Conservative MPs who voted to keep her in office – despite being perfectly aware (as who can not be?) that she is a lame duck Prime Minister causing little but harm and embarrassment to her party, her electorate and her country.

All day in the run up to the vote, May’s MPs have been dressing up their pusillanimity and self-serving weaselry as a mix of pragmatism, patriotism and high principle.

Read more

Trump Prepares for 2020

Source

Global Warming humbugs with private jets

The DCNF asked 31 businesses, foundations and individuals agitating for climate action if they’d support banning private jets. Most companies and individuals the DCNF reached out to did not respond, including Facebook, Apple, Google and other companies that often tout their “green image.” Not even former Vice President Al Gore, the father of climate activism, responded to TheDCNF’s question. In fact, all but two of the 26 corporations were silent when asked by TheDCNF if they would support a ban on private jets to help cut greenhouse gas emissions in line with what the United Nations says is needed to meet the Paris accord. The Daily Caller

My "12 Rules for Life": No. 2, SHOW LEADERSHIP — MANAGE YOURSELF

 Anyone who has had the task of reviewing applications for entry-level non-managerial employment will be aware of how many inexperienced people boast of their leadership skills. Moreover, anyone experienced in dealing with those newly recruited to the world of employment will likely have come across the novice intent on assuming direction of the operation within days of joining the team. An example that comes to mind is America's latest political sensation, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, already, it seems, running for President.

Such naive eagerness to lead is generally unappreciated by those with actual responsibility for the smooth operation of an administrative process or the turning of a profit. Rather, what is most valued is intelligent self-regulation to fulfill the objectives laid down by those with actual responsibility for end results. Thus, the leadership skill most appreciated by management is the capacity for leadership of an army of one, namely oneself.

Self-regulation is not a simple matter. Hard work is, well, hard. The temptation to break for a snack,  to check the Internet, or to engage co-workers in chat is at times all but irresistible. Moreover, to work effectively, one must be adequately prepared, both physically and mentally. That means no late nights or heavy drinking from Sunday to Thursday. It also means thinking in advance of how best to tackle the work ahead.

How, then, given the sensations, emotions and rationalizations that flood the mind, is one to achieve consistent self-mastery? To that question, one might expect psychology to have an answer, which indeed it does, although not necessarily the correct one. Indeed, psychology has, during the modern era, taken three shots at defining the springs of human action, the first two unquestionable duds. First, was the Freudian unconscious mind, now correctly written off as a farrago of fantastic nonsense. Then there was the much more scientific-seeming theory known as behaviorism, that held human action to be the product of reflexes induced by specific experiential regimes.

My "12 Rules for Life," No. 1: CUT OUT SUGAR

A hundred years ago, Americans consumed an average of ten pounds of sugar a year. Today they consume an average of one hundred and ten pounds, or 50 kilograms, of sugar a year. That is close to 100% of the healthy weight of a a woman of average height, and provides about one third of the calories required to meet the needs of most North American adults.

What is the result of making sugar the largest single component of the diet? An epidemic of obesity, diabetes, and general disability, including a lack of both physical fitness and mental sharpness. Yes, it's a fact, diabetes lowers your IQ. Rome it has been suggested fell because of lead in the water. The Western World is surely headed for demise because of surfeit of sugar.

Cutting sugar from your diet is not easy. First, because sugar is addictive. Second, because sugar is added to almost every kind of processed food you can buy, which makes it difficult to eliminate from your diet even if you try. There are two compelling reasons why sugar is in almost every processed food item: because, first, as an addictive substance, it tends to hook you on whatever branded product to which it is added; and second, it is one of the cheapest food commodities there is, and thus ideal for bulking up more expensive ingredients.

Vivre Les Gilets Jaunes: Or How the Plebs Are Turning on the Globalist Elites

For years we have lived in a climate of ‘You can’t say that’. You can’t criticise mass immigration — that’s xenophobia. You can’t oppose the EU — that’s Europhobia. You can’t raise concerns about radical Islam — that’s Islamophobia. You can’t agitate against climate-change policy — that’s climate-change denialism, on a par with Holocaust denialism, and anyone who dares to bristle against eco-orthodoxy deserves to be cast out of polite society. And yet now, in this populist moment, people are daring to say precisely these unsayable things. They’re standing up to the EU. They’re demanding that immigration become a democratic concern rather than something worked out for us by unaccountable bureaucrats in Brussels. And now they’re even grating against the hitherto unquestionable religious-style diktat that we must all drive less, shop less and do less in order to ‘save the planet’. Brendan O'Neill, Spectator Blogs

Instead of the confident leader, lecturing and preening on the global stage, [Macron] is barricaded in his palace, a sort of latter-day Marie Antoinette. French people can’t afford diesel? Let them buy Teslas. Jonathan Miller, Spectator Blogs

CBC Warns Trudeau He Risks Yellow Jacket Rebellion with His Contempt for the Canadian Nation

Amazingly, even the hyper-Liberal Canadian state broadcaster, the CBC, grasps that Justin Trudeau's globalist contempt for what he considers the passé Canadian nation, invites rebellion. Thus in an article illustrated with images of yellow-vested French rioters, they write:

In an astonishing statement to the New York Times in 2015, Justin Trudeau declared, "There is no core identity, no mainstream in Canada,'' and consequently that "makes us the first post-national state." ... One only has to look to recent events in France and the European project, in general, with Brexit a clue as to why nations are no longer keen on abandoning their autonomy for the lofty ambitions of leaders on the world stage. ... Brian Mulroney, one of our nation's elder statesmen, recently offered Trudeau some wisdom: It's the job of the Canadian prime minister to look after Canada first and the rest of the world next. Source: CBC

Deep State Treason

By James Howard Kunstler

... the Obama White House, along with CIA director John Brennan, and Director of National intel James Clapper, used the FBI and the DOJ (with support from the nation’s two leading newspapers), and help from Britain’s MI6 intel shop, to run illegal operations against Mr. Trump during the 2016 election, and then persisted in acts to delegitimize him after Jan 20, 2017.

Read article

Germany: The Face of the New Genocide

Anetta Kahane is a former secret police informer for the Communist 

Government of East Germany. She now heads Germany's cyber spy 

force charged with rooting out Nazi's, as identified by such signs as

sending the daughters to school with braided hair, or of having 

athletic sons. 

Anetta Kahane (Right), a one time informer for the Communist Government of East Germany, now heads Mutti Merkel's cyber spies, tasked with rooting out Nazis.

Frau Merkel, like Kahane, is a former East German citizen and Communist who served as secretary for "Agitation and Propaganda" in the youth wing of the East German Academy of Sciences.

Apparently, Kahane's agency is able to identify Nazis by noting such things as who sends their daughters to school with braided hair or who have athletic sons.

Kahane, so Breitbart reports, is "a fanatic supporter of open borders and has declared it vital that the European Union change its immigration policy so as to eventually make natives of the continent a minority."

Time for the Germans, what's left of them, to get a few million of those gilets jaunes.

Theresa May's Theresonous Brexit Deal

This "deal" will cost the British taxpayer £60 billion; require that the British still comply with EU rules without having any say in what those will be, and worst of all, it permits the British to leave the EU only if the EU agrees. It commits the British effectively to subjugation by the EU in perpetuity, with no recourse should the British change their mind. It is a prison. It is also the first step of the EU toward its dream of global governance: unaccountable, untransparent, unelected by the public, and with no way out. David Brown, Gatestone Institute

What's the alternative? No deal, obviously. Without a "deal," the UK's membership of the EU will lapse on March 29, 2019, without, according to the House of Lords, any legal obligation for the UK to make any payment to the EU. After that, the UK should just trade with the EU on a tit-for-tat basis. The EU with an $11 billion trade surplus with the UK is not going to screw its own exporters by putting tariffs on British Biscuits and Whiskey if that means equal tariffs on German cars and French wine.

As for Ireland, yes there'll have to be a border between North and South to protect the UK from uncontrolled migration, unless of course, the Irish decide to exit the EU and enter into a migration control agreement with the UK. This the Brits should encourage, for example by offering to pay 90% or more of the cost of a bridge between Ireland and Britain, thereby making it possible to drive all the way from Dublin, via the Channel Tunnel, to Paris, Berlin and Beijing.

Maybe the Irish would even consider a highly devolved political union with the UK to create an independent Federation of the British Isles: a federation to preserve and perpetuate the languages and cultures of the ancient nations of England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales — a friend-of-all-the-World, without entangling alliances, a danger to none but those who would harm her, for which purpose Britain's independent nuclear deterrent would be retained pending a safer means to insure national security.

Related: 

Mish: UK Debates the Meaning of "Temporary" as Legal Review Reviews Permanent Trap

Vox Pop: parliament betrays the British people

We've Called Theresa May Thereason May for Some Time. Here's the Proof She's a Traitor

The May Government was found in contempt of Parliament for failing to reveal to Parliament the advice it had received on May's Brexit "deal" with the EU. Thus compelled, the government released a portion, though not all, of the advice it had received on May's Brexit deal. From what has been released it is apparent, as related in this Spectator blog post, that the "deal" is an absolute betrayal of the public who voted to leave the European Union.

1. This is not the full legal advice on the May’s deal. It is a very selective piece of advice solely on the Protocol, art. 184 and 5. So no other issues are considered. Parliament asked for the full legal advice on the deal, not just part of the deal. Where is it?

2. May’s deal envisages the UK being in backstop indefinitely. It is staggering that she sought to conceal this advice from MPs or the public. “The Protocol is intended to subsist even when negotiations have clearly broken down…. despite statements in the Protocol that it is not intended to be permanent, and the clear intention of the parties that it should be replaced by alternative, permanent arrangements, in international law the Protocol would endure indefinitely. It is May’s duty to inform parliament in unambiguous terms. How can she claim to have fulfilled this duty? (Para. 16)

3. The backstop is not an insurance. It is the expected destination. Remember when we were told that the backstop is “just an insurance”, that it was unlikely that we’d need it? The legal advice makes clear that the backstop is both likely and in full contemplation of the parties (Para. 5). So everyone knows we are likely to go in. It is wholly wrong to for the government to pretend otherwise.

4. May says that promising to negotiate ‘in good faith’ will result in a future deal. The legal advice accepts that this phrase is meaningless. Her deal places the EU under no obligation at all. “All they [the EU] would have to do to show good faith would be to consider the UK’s proposals, even if they ultimately rejected them. This could go on repeatedly without such conduct giving rise to “bad faith” or failure to use best endeavours.”

5. The UK will never be able to leave the Customs Union without the EU’s agreement. May’s deal “does not provide for a mechanism that is likely to enable the UK lawfully to exit the UK wide customs union without a subsequent agreement.” And as for the time limit? Forget it. “This remains the case even if parties are still negotiating many years later, and even if the parties believe that talks have clearly broken down and there is no prospect of a future relationship agreement. The resolution of such a stalemate would have to be political.”

6. May’s deal may violate EU law. Under Article 50, the mechanisms that EU member states are allowed to leave, a transition agreement cannot be open-ended because that means it is not temporary. So this dodgy backstop might be illegal under EU law. “There may be, therefore, some doubt as to whether the proposed Protocol is consistent with EU law, and that uncertainly will increase the longer it subsists.”

7. The EU may have the power to tap the UK for even more money given the expense of the ties that will still bind us. “The legal and administrative arrangements required to underpin the Protocol would be enormously complex, particularly in the light of proposed GB / NI flexibilities and will require considerable resources. These are not something to which the Commission will readily commit in the long term.”

8. The UK has no proper legal protection so is being asked to ‘trust’ the EU. “Given the lack of any effective means of termination” to the backstop, “the UK may have to trust in seeking a satisfactory outcome from negotiations.”

9. The ‘arbitration panel’ is useless in practice (Paras. 25 to 28) certainly when it comes to deciding if the UK can ever escape. “ it is extremely difficult to see how a five member arbitral panel made up of lawyers who were independent of the parties would be prepared to make a judgment as political as whether the Protocol is no longer necessary.

10. There is no legal protection for the UK: a solution to this (if it comes) would have to be political. But if we sign May’s deal, we are in a legally binding treaty – the EU now refuses to bend or change rules for us. It has refused every day of the negotiation. There is no basis to conclude the EU will change once we are controlled by them in the backstop.

Such is the swindling shyster who today rules as Britain's Prime Minister. Time for someone to command her, in the name of God, to go.

Quote of the Day: No. 79 The Evils of Bureacracy

Camille Paglia on the evil consequences of unconstrained bureaucracy:

A persistent characteristic of civilizations in decline throughout history has been their self-strangling by slow, swollen, and stupid bureaucracies. The current atrocity of crippling student debt in the US is a direct product of an unholy alliance between college administrations and federal bureaucrats — a scandal that ballooned over two decades with barely a word of protest from our putative academic leftists, lost in their post-structuralist fantasies. Political correctness was not created by administrators, but it is ever-expanding campus bureaucracies that have constructed and currently enforce the oppressively rule-ridden regime of college life. In the modern world, so wondrously but perilously interconnected, a principle of periodic reduction of bureaucracy should be built into every social organism. Freedom cannot survive otherwise. Source

Four Questions Google the Crooked Search Company Won't Answer

Google has declined to answer the following questions related to an internal debate among Google employees about suppressing The Daily Caller and Breitbart in the company’s search function.

From Google's failure to respond, the inference is clear, Google is not a neutral information source, it is a crooked search engine that seeks to manipulate public opinion.

Here are the questions Google has declined to answer:

1. Is Google aware of other instances in which employees advocated for suppressing The Daily Caller or Breitbart?

2. [Google engineer Scott] Byer wrote in his post: “Let’s make sure that we reverse things in four years.” He seems to indicate that Google employees should take actions to make sure Donald Trump doesn’t win re-election in 2020. Is that a use of official Google communications that the company approves of?

3. Have other Google VPs been part of internal conversations about potentially suppressing conservative media outlets, or just [engineering vice president David] Besbris?

4. Previous reporting by the Wall Street Journal demonstrated that Google employees brainstormed ways to manipulate search results in response to President Trump’s travel ban. Can Google guarantee that there won’t be a third example of Google employees seeking to manipulate search functions for anti-Trump purposes?

Source

Related: 

CanSpeccy: Google: The Crooked Search Engine

Bush Dead: The Evil Has Died

A bit of good news: George H.W. Bush is dead, finally. At least he’ll do no more harm. But the harm he did do was enough.

Like the Nazis his father did good business with, Bush wanted a New World Order – and spoke of it lovingly and often. And now it’s upon us, in no small measure because of his machinations and those of his frog-torturing, mass-murdering, war criminal son – who was elevated to the position from which he was able to commit mass murder solely on the juice provided by his connected father.

The entire Bush family is a crime syndicate that puts the Corleones to shame (with George W. Bush playing the role of Fredo).

Bush Sr. – who wasn’t in Dallas on November 22, 1963 and not a CIA officer at the time – was later proved to be both of those things. His leprous fingerprints are all over the termination of the last American president who wasn’t a wholly owned subsidiary of the military industrial complex.

Read more

WW 1: British troops thoughts on german soldiers

Thereason May's Lousy, Stinking Brexit Swindle

THERESA MAY is ­banking on the BOBs – the people “bored of Brexit”, who are sick and tired of all the ­endless bickering and want Nanny May to “just get on with it.”

Even if “just getting on with it” means becoming a non- voting member of the EU?

Even if “just getting on with it” means our country — not invaded for 1,000 years — becomes a colony of Brussels?

No thanks, Nanny May!

It is not Brexit that the ­British people are bored with.

The British people are sick of being BULLIED.

Bullied by politicians like that eternal glumbucket Philip Hammond, a Chancellor of the Exchequer with the demeanour of a coffin chaser, who has never ever accepted the result of the largest poll in British history.

Bullied by Bank of England boss Mark Carney, who warns that daring No Deal will cause unemployment to soar, house prices to tumble and inflation to come over all giddy.

And more from the Sun

The Treason of the Bush Family

The Oligarchical Bush Family of Generational Treason

How Bush’s grandfather helped Hitler’s rise to power

The Bush Crime Family: Four Generations of Wall Street War-Making and War-Profiteering August, 2004 By Dr. Eric Karlstrom

We are witnessing Operation Mockingbird in real time as it shapes the public opinion on the death of President Bush

Lost Interview Reveals Bush’s Plans to Invade Iraq – 2 Years Before 9/11

re: The Bush Family Cabal-and the million dollar question

The Bush Drug Sting, The Sins of the Father, The Sins of the Son and -- The Smoking Airplane

George Herbert Walker Bush and the myth of the 'good' Gulf War

The Bin Ladens and the Bushes: On 9/11 George Herbert W. Bush Meets Osama’s Brother Shafiq bin Laden

The Western Nations Continue Down the Road to Tyranny and State-directed Self-Destruction

The EU will criminalize spoken opposition to European genocide by mass replacement immigration:

The EU is set to criminalize speech that criticizes migration. In a press conference, European Parliament Member, Marcel de Graaff, raised the alarm over an international conference in Marrakech, Morocco on Dec. 11 and 12 where the U.N. Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration is to be signed:  “The criticism of migration will be a criminal offense...Media outlets that give room for criticism of migration,can be shut down. ... It will become impossible to criticize Ms. Merkel's 'Welcome Migrants Politics' without risk of being jailed for hate speech.” Source

While the US criminalizes the mention of Christ at Christmas:

To celebrate the birthday of Jesus Christ, the Robious Middle School in Midlothian, Virginia, has banned any Christmas carols that mention the name of Jesus. School administrators reportedly explained they had made the decision to “avoid singing anything of a direct sacred nature” in order to be “more sensitive to the increasing diverse population at the school.” Source

Meantime, Google's fucking robot is set to teach you manners.

And then there are those self-hating Swedes:

Swedish school bans centuries-old Christian tradition but celebrates Muhammad’s journey to heaven

Quote of the Day, No. 48

... those who existed during the distant time in which the fundamental epics of our culture emerged were much more concerned with the actions that dictated survival that with anything approximating what we now understand as objective truth. Before the dawn of the scientific world view, reality was construed differently.

Jordan B. Peterson: 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos

As anyone who has ever read the great Greek, Roman, or Chinese philosophers knows, as anyone who is familiar with the great Christian theologians and philosophers of the Middle Ages will recognize, it is massively false to assert that objective truth was invented circa 1518 AD, or that reality was construed differently before then. This leads the critical reader to wonder who, or what, could possibly be the source for this astonishingly incorrect claim.

Why, it is Jordan Peterson himself. The endnote on the page literally cites one J.B. Peterson.

I outlined this in some detail in Peterson, J.B. (1999). Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief. Routledge, New York. 

This is a remarkable hall of mirrors that Peterson is building around himself. He goes the New Atheists one better. Whereas Richard Dawkins liked nothing better that to quote Daniel Dennett quoting Richard Dawkins, and to praise a Sam Harris book chock full of quotes from Richard Dawkins, Peterson simply cuts out the middle man and appeals directly to himself as the relevant authority on the nature of reality.

T.R. Beale, aka Vox Day: Jordanetics

Unraveling the riddle of Jordan B. Peterson

“Much of today's incivility and contempt for personal liberty has its roots on college campuses, and most of the uncivil and contemptuous are people with college backgrounds.” Walter E. Williams

Professor Jordan B. Peterson came to public attention as the result of the stand he took against bullying campus radicals, the Ontario Human Rights Commission and the Government of Canada, all apparently seeking to compel the use of specific terms with reference to transgender persons.

In this stand, Peterson achieved recognition as a staunch defender of the right of free speech and an able debater, who at his best, easily demolished opponents at the BBC, in the Canadian Senate, and on the university campus.

Yet Peterson is no hero to many who share his opposition to the radical left. Rather he has been decried by conservatives as a demagogue, a fraud, and even a madman.

Why the apparent contradictory response? The reason I believe, at least in part, is that Peterson is mentally unstable, specifically, the victim of bipolar disorder. This conclusion is consistent with Peterson's admitted use of anti-depressants. Moreover, although in his public appearances Peterson usually makes very good sense, during the presumed manic phase of manic-depressive illness, Peterson may make very little sense, or none at all. At such times his assertions become increasingly bizarre, and indeed fantastic, while in tone he becomes increasingly messianic, his voice rising at the end of each declamatory statement to something like a shriek.

But that may not be all one needs to know to understand the rise of Jordan Peterson to the status of Canada's first internationally signficant public intellectual since Marshall McLuhan. For example, in the following video Luke Rudkowski of "We Are Change" informs us that Peterson has closely associated with agents of the New World Order, which is to say the proponents of global governance, including the Trilateral Commission, and the United Nations:

More about Peterson's globalist connections here.

Quote of the Day: No. 79

Watergate had tragic Shakespearean overtones, with Nixon as King Lear, but Russia-Gate — perhaps the last gate America goes through on its giant slalom run to collapse — is but a Chinese Fire Drill writ large.

James Kunstler

Left-Wing Virtue Signaling, Right-wing Hate Speech

Source

The Art of Trolling with Dr. James Sears

Not all Canadian intellectuals are are as weird as Jordan Peterson …

Dr. Sears is the editor of the satirical publication, Your Ward News, that the PC political parties and their media enablers seek to suppress.

Jordan Peterson: The Intellectual We Deserve

Jordan Peterson’s popularity is the sign of a deeply impoverished political and intellectual landscape…

by NATHAN J. ROBINSON

If you want to appear very profound and convince people to take you seriously, but have nothing of value to say, there is a tried and tested method. First, take some extremely obvious platitude or truism. Make sure it actually does contain some insight, though it can be rather vague. Something like “if you’re too conciliatory, you will sometimes get taken advantage of” or “many moral values are similar across human societies.” Then, try to restate your platitude using as many words as possible, as unintelligibly as possible, while never repeating yourself exactly. Use highly technical language drawn from many different academic disciplines, so that no one person will ever have adequate training to fully evaluate your work. Construct elaborate theories with many parts. Draw diagrams. Use italics liberally to indicate that you are using words in a highly specific and idiosyncratic sense. Never say anything too specific, and if you do, qualify it heavily so that you can always insist you meant the opposite. Then evangelize: speak as confidently as possible, as if you are sharing God’s own truth. Accept no criticisms: insist that any skeptic has either misinterpreted you or has actually already admitted that you are correct. Talk as much as possible and listen as little as possible. Follow these steps, and your success will be assured. (It does help if you are male and Caucasian.)

Jordan Peterson appears very profound and has convinced many people to take him seriously. Yet he has almost nothing of value to say. This should be obvious to anyone who has spent even a few moments critically examining his writings and speeches, which are comically befuddled, pompous, and ignorant. They are half nonsense, half banality. In a reasonable world, Peterson would be seen as the kind of tedious crackpot that one hopes not to get seated next to on a train.

Read more

First Life Found on Mars

NASA's Insight rover greeted by denizen of Mars

Socialism versus Capitalism

Source

Ambassador Craig Murray: Assange Never Met Manafort; the Guardian Is Publishing Blatant MI6 Lies

The right wing Ecuadorean government of President Moreno continues to churn out its production line of fake documents regarding Julian Assange, and channel them straight to MI6 mouthpiece Luke Harding of the Guardian.

 Amazingly, more Ecuadorean Government documents have just been discovered for the Guardian, this time spy agency reports detailing visits of Paul Manafort and unspecified “Russians” to the Embassy. By a wonderful coincidence of timing, this is the day after Mueller announced that Manafort’s plea deal was over.

The problem with this latest fabrication is that Moreno had already released the visitor logs to the Mueller inquiry. Neither Manafort nor these “Russians” are in the visitor logs.

This is impossible. The visitor logs were not kept by Wikileaks, but by the very strict Ecuadorean security. Nobody was ever admitted without being entered in the logs. The procedure was very thorough. To go in, you had to submit your passport (no other type of document was accepted). A copy of your passport was taken and the passport details entered into the log. Your passport, along with your mobile phone and any other electronic equipment, was retained until you left, along with your bag and coat. I feature in the logs every time I visited.

Read more

Nobody Left to Lie To: Christopher Hitchens on the Triangulation of William Jefferson Clinton

By Whom Will You be Ruled: God or the Tyranny of Tech?

Civilization in all its magnificent complexity requires collaboration not only among family, friends and neighbors, but among strangers. That is possible only with a civilized people, which is to say a people that adheres to a universal moral code.

That code, in basic form, is this:

The Universal Moral Code: 1. Don't lie 2. Don't steal 3. Don't shag your neighbor's wife 4. Don't kill people And, reinforcing the second and third commandments: 5. Don't even think about stealing your neighbor's ox or his ass or grabbing his wife's ass And, reinforcing those ideas: 6. Respect your parents (i.e., the conservatives who are the upholders of the moral tradition)  7. Honor the source of moral authority 8. Have no allegiance to any but the one true moral authority 9. Don't engage in idolatry, i.e., the worship of money, or celebrities, or any material thing including nature (Gaia) herself  10. Take one day each week to rest and to reflect on how well your conduct conforms to the code

The code of civilized people allows harmonious and productive collaboration among total strangers, people who may live far from one another, speak different languages and worship different gods.

 In addition to this code, the Christianized peoples of Europe — the people who created the greatest civilization the world has yet seen — added another rule, a rule that was never formulated as a rule but which was widely adopted by a process of emulation.

11. Be prepared to sacrifice your own interest for the good of others.

This last was the essential novelty that Christianity introduced into the relations among men, a rule exemplified by the master of it all, Jesus of Nazareth, who so the Church has always taught, "died for our sins." What that means, simply, is that Jesus underwent crucifixion as a necessary prelude to the miracle of resurrection, thereby showing sinful mankind that there really was a God in heaven into whose kingdom they might enter.

But today the Western nations have trashed Christ and thereby destroyed faith in the Christian moral code, including the notion of self-sacrifice for the good of the others. The media exist to lie as a means of plutocratic government control, not as a means to broadcast the truth. Words uttered in public, are seen by the elite as instruments to control the conduct of the proles, not as a means to communicate truth.

And indeed the views that deception is the primary use of language has now become almost universal. Mark Twain held that the essence of a joke is a lie badly told, a principle well exemplified by any episode of the Seinfeld sitcom. And the popularity of Seinfeld proves both how normal lying has become, and how little folks seem to care.

Theft may still, in principle, be deplored, yet there is a widespread belief that wealth is unfairly distributed and should be redistributed by the force of law, which is to say, a sort of collective theft justified on the basis of some political process.

As for adultery, its depiction is mainstream entertainment and hence a most powerful incitement to sexual covetousness.

As for coveting one's neighbor's ox or his ass, the average person may see as many as 5000 ads per day, a more potent stimulus to envy and unsatisfied material desire than seeing your neighbors ox over the fence.

Honor of parents is, of course, to be derided and indeed legally obstructed, since it results in adherence to out-dated, sexist, racist, misogynistic, homophobic, Islamophobic, you name it, deplorable ideas.

As for honoring God, forget it. The Christian God has been unmasked. He is that old, ignorant, vain, sadistic racist bastard, the Jewish god, Yahweh. No, the source of moral authority today is the academy. The professors of Women's studies, Gender studies, and of many other faculties beside, where upholders of the Christian tradition are as rare as the Great Auk. In today's Western university it is vastly more respectable to be an anti-white racist than an upholder of traditional Christian belief.

Hence my question. Which do you prefer: self control based on acceptance of Christian ideology, the traditional religion of the West; or external control, based on snitchery, brainwashing as education, and legally enforced political correctness? It is a choice between, on the one hand, self-control based in Christian faith, and, on the other hand, external control leading inevitably to a high-tech slave state, where freedom of thought must die and speech be controlled.

China, a great nation with a tradition of adherence to the words of the wise, and subservience to age and authority, has opted for a system of high-tech surveillance combined with reliance on millions of informers, a return to among the most horrendous features of Communist dictatorship. The West is clearly moving in the same direction: our emails are scanned for incriminating words and permanently recorded by intelligence agencies for later review, our conversations are overheard by Amazon's Alexa, or our Android cell phone, constantly urging us to initiate a conversation by saying "OK Google." Even lampposts in England now have ears, so morally degraded has become the home of Western freedom.

So will we abandon Western civilization, a civilization that it was the intention of Western globalists to spread throughout the world? Or will we succumb to a tech-based system of tyranny? In the Western World, the choice is still ours  to make, or so it would be if people understood there was a decision to make.

Hungarian Foreign Minister Handles CNN's Insolent Interrogation