Showing posts with label vaccination. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vaccination. Show all posts

Thursday, March 11, 2021

Why You Should Refuse the "Vaccine"

You should resist the RNA Covid vaccine because: 

First, there are well defined potential dangers to health consequent on such inoculation, dangers that have not been excluded through long-term safety testing. Hazards include:

Anaphylactic shock leading to possible death, and;

Antibody-dependent enhancement of susceptibility to virus infection and disease manifestation, with reference to which see: 
 
 

Second, vaccine efficacy is not well defined and may be minimal. Hence, the US Center for Disease Control advises those who have been fully vaccinated, meaning those having had two RNA vaccine shots, to:

keep taking precautions in public places like wearing a mask, staying 6 feet apart from others, and avoiding crowds and poorly ventilated spaces until we know more.

So what, really, is the point? 

 Third, unless you are in hospital or a care home, your risk of death from Covid-19 is negligible. 

How so, did you ask?  

Because,

First, more than half of all severe Covid-19 cases are likely hospital-acquired, as this study in Scotland shows to have been the case in December 2020.

Second, in most if not all Western countries, between 40 and 70% of Covid-19 deaths are reported to have occurred in nursing homes.

So excluding hospital-acquired infections and care-home-acquired infections, how many serious infections were prevented by lockdown? Well actually, probably less than none since lockdown itself promoste infection spread within households.  

Fourth, vaccination is being pushed to enforce a requirement for what, in time, will likely become a universal internal passport that every citizen will be required to carry and which will define your social credit score as tech-empowered governments seek to reduce citizenship to helotry.  

Thursday, March 4, 2021

Is the Vaccine More Deadly Than the Virus?

Arutz Sheva, February 18, 2021: Vaccination in Israel: Challenging mortality figures?

A front-page article appeared in the FranceSoir newspaper about findings on the Nakim website regarding what some experts are calling "the high mortality caused by the vaccine."

The paper interviews Aix-Marseille University Faculty of Medicine Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit's Dr. Hervé Seligmann and engineer Haim Yativ about their research and data analysis. They claim that Pfizer's shot causes "mortality hundreds of times greater in young people compared to mortality from coronavirus without the vaccine, and dozens of times more in the elderly, when the documented mortality from coronavirus is in the vicinity of the vaccine dose, thus adding greater mortality from heart attack, stroke, etc."

Dr Hervé Seligmann works at the Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France. He is of Israeli-Luxembourg nationality. He has a B. Sc. In Biology from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and has written over 100 scientific publications.

FranceSoir writes that they follow publications, data analyzes, and feedback from various countries on vaccination, and have therefore taken an interest in the Nakim article, asking to interview them in order to understand their analysis and its limitations.















The authors of the article declare they have no conflicts or interests other than having children in Israel.

After a presentation, the authors discussed their data analysis, the validations carried out, limitations, and above all, their conclusions that they compare with data received via a Health Ministry Freedom of Information Act request.

Their findings are:

  • There is a mismatch between the data published by the authorities and the reality on the ground.
  • They have three sources of information, besides the emails and adverse event reports they receive through the Internet. These three sources are Israeli news site Ynet, the Israeli Health Ministry database, and the U.S. federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database.
  • In January 2021, there were 3,000 records of vaccine adverse events, including 2,900 for mRNA vaccines.
  • Compared to other years, mortality is 40 times higher.
  • On February 11, a Ynet article presented data related to vaccination. The authors of the Nakim article claim to have debunked this analysis based on data published by Ynet itself: “We took the data by looking at mortality during the vaccination period, which spans 5 weeks. By analyzing these data, we arrived at startling figures that attribute significant mortality to the vaccine."
  • The authors say “vaccinations have caused more deaths than the coronavirus would have caused during the same period."
  • Haim Yativ and Dr. Seligmann declare that for them, "this is a new Holocaust," in face of Israeli authority pressure to vaccinate citizens.

They also invite specialists to complete their analyses, and intend to pursue legal follow-up to their discovery. The Health Ministry was not available for comment on a FranceSoir query regarding the findings.

The authors also deplored "the fact of not being able to communicate on this vital information" to their fellow citizens.

On their site, Nakim writes: "On February 11, 2021, Ynet (the most known Israeli News website) published a confused and confusing article entitled 'Vaccination efficiency data in Israel, and its rapid effects on the young'.

"Our reanalyses of these data explain why during the massive vaccination project initiated mid-December 2020 during a confinement, daily new confirmed COVID-19 cases failed to decrease as they do during confinements, and, more importantly, why numbers of serious, critical, and death cases increased during that period that covered at least one month. From mid-December to mid-February (two months), 2,337 among all Israeli 5,351 official COVID-deaths occurred. Our analyses indicate orders of magnitude increases in deaths rates during the 5-week long vaccination process, as compared to the unvaccinated and those after completing the vaccination process. Presumably, asymptomatic cases before vaccination, and those infected shortly after the 1st dose, tend to develop graver symptoms than those unvaccinated.

"The Ynet article is organized in an exciting way and uses data provided in an erroneous way by the Ministry of Health. It is unclear whether this was intentional to prove the vaccine's efficiency or if this was done erroneously because the provided data were misunderstood. Note that in Israel, all vaccines are from Pfizer.

"The data in the table, rather than indicating the vaccine efficacy, indicate the vaccine's adverse effects," the authors conclude.

Sources:

http://www.nakim.org/israel-forums/viewtopic.php?t=270812

https://www.francesoir.fr/videos-debriefings/vaccination-en-israel-des-chiffres-de-mortalite-qui-interpellent-video

Related: 

British Government Study Confirms Covid-19 Vaccine Risk: Infections INCREASE in Fortnight after Jab

90% of ALL coronavirus fatalities have occurred in countries where HALF of people are fat

Big Pharma’s COVID Vaccine

53 Dead in Gibraltar in 10 Days After Experimental Pfizer mRNA COVID Injections Started

Thursday, August 27, 2020

Covid19: A Mechanism to Drive New World Order Tyranny?

By Brandon Smith

AltMarket.com, August 26, 2020: All over the Western world ever since 9/11 there have been incremental steps towards what many liberty advocates would call a “police state”; a system in which governments are no longer restricted by the boundaries of civil liberties and are given the power to do just about anything they want in the name of public safety. The use of “the law” as a tool for injecting tyranny into a culture is the first tactic of all totalitarians.

The idea is that by simply writing government criminality into the law books, that criminality somehow becomes justified by virtue of legal recognition. It's all very circular. Whenever government abuse of the people is initiated, it's always initiated in the name of what's “best for society as a whole”. To save society, the individuals that make up a society must be sublimated or destroyed. This mentality is the complete opposite of what the Founding Fathers in America fought and died for, but as Thomas Jefferson once said:
“Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add ‘within the limits of the law’ because law is often but the tyrant’s will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.”
In countries like Australia, which claim to value Western democratic principles of liberty and rule by the people, the perception is that civil rights are codified into the legal framework just as they are in the US. However, there are some glaring differences and issues; specifically, Australian citizens (like many European citizens) have absolutely no means to compel their government or the elites that influence their government to limit themselves. It is these nations, in which the populations have been mostly disarmed and pacified, that any agenda for tyranny will first be established. But we will get to that in a moment...

Saturday, July 18, 2020

Bill Gates and the Billionaires Behind the Drive for Global governance

There are a couple of comments in response to an earlier post on the Corona virus pandemic that I want to respond to with the convenience of a regular post rather than dependence on Blogger's spavined comment software.  

First:
YusefJuly 18, 2020 at 12:10 PM
I'm going to take a stab at explaining what's going on from a more "structural" perspective. I want to steer clear of the more lurid conspiracy theory aspects of my understanding to this point. I will explain why.

The first structural feature: the concentration of worldwide wealth, first to a small number of nation states; then, within those nation states to a remarkably small number of individuals.

The second structural feature: globalization as a fait accompli. It is a done deal now and the global economy and political organization is the reality. Most of what we grew up believing about the economy and political organization (the nation state, democracy, totalitarianism, or communism-- you name it-- it is all obsolete.)

About the first structural feature: concentration of wealth. What I want to call attention to is a phenomena we can all agree on: the emergence of a single man named Bill Gates as a world leader of epic power and sway.

When I say we can all agree on it, I mean no one doubts Gates is one of the most wealthy and powerful people in the world. (Some people claim he is the second most wealthy--it wouldn't surprise me.) It is not controversial he is heavily invested in vaccines: vaccine research and development, production, and dissemination. This investment is both through his charitable foundation, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and in for-profit private companies. (I recall several years ago reading he'd invested 11 billion in a for-profit private company. He likely has increased this. I need to check to see if I can find out where he's at now.)

It is not controversial this one man, Bill Gates, contributes more to the funding of the World Health Organization,(WHO) than all but one of the 193 nation-state members.

As an aside, note the confluence of structural element number one and number two in this truly extraordinary state of affairs: One man contributing more than all of those nation-states to an organization which is an outgrowth of the United Nations, a signal or earlier attempt (failed) toward a global governance.
That through the investment of vast personal resources, Bill Gates seeks a pivotal role in the global response to a pandemic confirms the role of the money power in the drive for global governance.

Almost 120 years ago, Cecil Rhodes, with the backing of Lord Rothschild and other bankers, created a secret society with the goal of bringing the entire world under British rule. The society still exists and is known by its public face as the British Institute for International Affairs, or Chatham House, and its American spin-off, the Council on Foreign Relations. Rhodes' project, backed as it was by Lord Rothschild and other bankers, thus set the world on course for control by what Carrol Quigley referred to, in his magnum opus, Tragedy and Hope, as the Money Power.

Writing in the 1960's, Quigley assumed that, as at the founding of Rhodes' Secret Society, banks would remain central to the Money Power. However, as the Canadian economist, John Kenneth Galbraith, realized, by the 1960s corporations were increasingly able to control competition and hence fix prices and were thus able to accumulate capital sufficient to their investment needs without resort to the banks. Thus, the Money Power came increasingly to be dominated by corporate managers who pursued globalization for the sole purpose of  profit maximization.

The vast importance of corporations in the process of globalization became evident following the 1994 General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade to which 128 countries were a party. Under that agreement, great corporations based in Europe, America and Japan were free to move capital and technology to where labor was cheapest, environmental and workplace safety regulations were least onerous, while shipping goods to where prices were highest, and taking profits where taxes were lowest.

Since 1994, however, there has been a further evolution of the Money Power, as vast personal fortunes have been accumulated by entrepreneurs such as Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, and dozens of others. What we are seeing now, as you show in the case of Bill Gates and global health policy, is that the globalization project is taking on a more idiosyncratic course as individual plutocrats are able to impose their personal judgment on how the future of the world should unfold.

Second:
YusefJuly 18, 2020 at 12:11 PM
Now we have this one man, Bill Gates, exercising influence and power. The exact nature of the way Gates is exercising influence and power IS CONTROVERSIAL. I don't deny it. What needs to be remembered, though, is something which wasn't controversial very long ago in the US, Canada, Britain or any other western democracy: systems of checks and balances and other forms of restraint on ALL exercises of public power and influence. I have to wonder how hard it would be to get people to see, in the case of Bill Gates and this pandemic, we do not have such systems in effect.

We don't need the idea of Bill Gates as a psychopathic madman conspiring to depopulate the planet and make himself a trillion dollars richer by manipulating a crisis. All we actually need is recognition he is no longer "one man throwing his two cents into the pot, along with everyone else's two cents." We don't have a war of, or marketplace, of words and ideas duking it out on a level playing field so that in the long run the better ones win.

We have one guy, who may very well have the best intentions, pulling strings here and there in the way he thinks is best-- but without any contest of ideas-- not likely the best FOR EVERYONE or, failing that, FOR THE GREATER GOOD. He can't! He has his narrow perspective, his personal experiences, his unconscious desires and drives, his imperfections, limitations, defects of character, intelligence, and personality-- just like all us slobs. (Here and there he may have some quality to recommend him so what, but I alone know at least a dozen smarter and better men.)

There are corollaries to this. Gates is not where he is due to his merits. (Not really.) The people beneath him aren't necessarily there due to their merits, either. Gates has business skills, I would say, probably some very rusty computer skills, and he has less knowledge of biology and medicine, I think, than you or I. He is to some degree or other unable to evaluate who is best and what is best. (This is true for so many of our "leaders". They are so out of their depth it is painful. I even felt sorry for Trump. He just plain doesn't know what's going on and he's too old and too stressed to learn.) Gates is going to feel comfortable working with some people, not others, and will, as we all may tend to do, think those are the best. He is going to have, as many wealthy and powerful people do, a bias in favor of those who obtain access to him personally. These people are also not necessarily the best and may be among the worst. They may very well have access because they are powerful enough, or corrupt enough, to get it.

I have to stop here. Hopefully you can see where I am going.

Every time I have seen a goof-- and there have been so many-- (the 20% hospitalization rate for those infected is an example; so are Neil Ferguson's modeling results), I have been angered and seen it all as a hoax (and conspiracy.) There is plenty of evidence of hoax, conspiracy, gross negligence, and corruption, but what I am thinking now is it has more to do with our global abandonment OF WHAT WORKED WELL ENOUGH for what we all knew had to be avoided and guarded against.
Yes, the problem well stated.

Unfortunately, there seems no obvious way back. Money has always had political influence, and with so much money held by so few, the influence of egocentric, idiosyncratic, or truly insane individuals seems certain to grow.

But Bill Gates`s  strange, not to say Strangeloveian manner and impulses, gives warning to the world, so none can claim ignorance of what may lie ahead.

But what to do?

What do others think?

Meantime:


      Related     
Tom Chivers: Why Covid will become the new common cold
National Post: Does humanity have an unseen ally against COVID?

Saturday, March 21, 2020

The Novel Corona Virus: the Biggest Mass Killer That Kills Almost No One Since Mad Cow Disease

Is the novel Corona virus scare a hoax to change public attitudes about the care and maintenance of the elderly, or to facilitate acceptance of compulsory vaccination?

Here's one doctor's assessment (if the video doesn't play for you here, you can get it directly from U-Tube, unless it's been flushed).



And has the risk of contracting the novel Corona virus, Covid-19, been massively exaggerated by media and governments? So it would appear from this analysis of the epidemic aboard the Diamond Princess cruise ship.

What that article shows is that despite the near ideal conditions for disease transmission, a closely confined and highly social population, 83% of passengers aboard the Diamond Princess were uninfected.

Of those infected, almost half were without disease symptoms. Of those made ill, mortality was 1.2%. And of those who died all were over 70 years of age.

Does a disease like that seem like a good reason for shuttering the economy, flinging public funds in all directions, stiffing the people with massive new debt while debasing the currency, and imposing a near police-state level of supervision to prevent people from going about their lives as they see fit?

But if you are still worried about dying of what can certainly be a nasty illness, we'd advise taking 2000 units of Vitamin D, daily. Vitamin D upregulates production of innate antibiotics by the endogenous immune system, and in a controlled study has been shown to massively reduce susceptibility to flu infection. For details, we recommend this lucid and informative paper: John J. Cannell, and others: On the epidemiology of influenza.

Meantime: Israel Embraces the Plan that Boris Johnson and Donald Trump Chickened Out Of:


Related:
Peter Hitchens: Is shutting down Britain – with unprecedented curbs on ancient liberties – REALLY the best answer?

Saturday, March 14, 2020

How Herd Immunity Is Supposed to Work: Pretty Cool — If It Works

This three-minute video explains how vaccination works to protect a population, even when many, perhaps most, are not vaccinated.



The same logic applies in the case of naturally acquired immunity within a population.

Here's the explanation of the UK Government's policy in response to the bat flu, as provided by Guido Fawkes:

The government’s internationally unique strategy is premised on the idea that the majority of us will inevitably get the coronavirus and for most of us it will be merely an unpleasant experience from which we will recover. Letting the healthy get it, with the more vulnerable kept physically separated from the majority, in the expectation Britons will develop herd immunity and because immune people cannot infect others. [Thus], in the long run, [there will be fewer] fatalities.

The British Government policy reponse to COVID19 benefits from the Chinese experience. What that experience shows is that the virus-caused demand for hospital care and mortality rises sharply with age, doing so strongly over the age of 60. The UK response reflects this fact.

Thus, the authorities are allowing the infection to spread throughout the population to the point it impacts a substantial number of the elderly. At that point, the elderly will be required to go into quarantine for four months for their own protection.

Quarantining the elderly will have two effects:

(1) it will prevent mass infection of those most liable to life-threatening disease symptoms, thereby limiting both mortality and demand for hospital care;

(2) it will reduce the average number of people each infected person will infect, i.e., the reproduction rate or R_nought. The latter effect, combined with the rise in the proportion of the under-65 population who by then will have acquired immunity, will drive the reproduction rate down, hopefully below 1.0, at which point the epidemic will die out.

Perhaps Britain's current crop of bureaucrats and government advisers are smarter than the old guard:



But: Did they get the timing wrong?

Related:
Buzzfeed: 
The UK Only Realised "In The Last Few Days" That Its Coronavirus Strategy Would "Likely Result In Hundreds of Thousands of Deaths"
Business Insider: People over 70 in the UK will be quarantined at home for 4 months in a 'wartime' effort to tackle coronavirus