Showing posts with label infection-specific mortality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label infection-specific mortality. Show all posts

Thursday, May 14, 2020

Covid-19 in Britain: Herd Immunity Achieved

A team of researchers from The University of Manchester, Salford Royal and Res Consortium, have shown that a significant proportion of people in the UK—over 25%—is likely to have been infected already by the COVID-19 virus.

The study—published this week in the International Journal of Clinical Practice—is the first to use the published local authority data to assess the cumulative impact of infection since the COVID-19 outbreak began.

This has enabled them to calculate the R-value—the number of people infected by one person with COVID-19—within each local authority area.

The published case data from the 144 Local Authorities analyzed by the team now gives an R value of well below 1.

Source
So,  with a reported UK Covid19 death toll, so far, of 33,614, a 25% infection rate, and a population of 67 million, the infection-specific Covid19 mortality rate is just under one in 2000, or 0.05%, about the same as the seasonal flu.

If, as in Canada, Italy, the US, and many other countries, most Covid 19 deaths in the UK are among elderly residents of care-homes, those numbers imply a Covid19 death toll among the non-care-home-residents of between 0.01 and 0.25%, or one per 40,000.

Ample justification for wrecking the economy, and driving people nuts due to weeks of pointless incarceration, no doubt, but time now to end the insanely obsessive caution and allow people to get on with their lives.

Related:
Attempt to eradicate covid could bury us
Doctors raise alarm about health effects of continued coronavirus shutdownChinese Firm Shows Neutralizing Antibodies Stop Corona Virus
 Delingpole: Killing the Elderly In Care Homes to Save the NHS. Nice Work, Boris!Cambridge U. Cancels "Face-to-Face" Lectures Until September 2021
Almost 5% of Los Angeles Residents Positive for Covid Antibodies
10 Steps To Turn A Pandemic Into The Brave New Normal
The COVID-19 "Dark Winter" PsyOp: Question Everything...
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: CATASTROPHE: 20% Of Human Test Subjects Severely Injured From Gates-Fauci Coronavirus Vaccine By Moderna
Catte Black: 10 Steps to Turn a Pandemic into the Brave New Normal

Opposed to Vaccination?: Bill Gates Has a Message for You


UK: Former Supreme Court Justice: Why the Lockdown Should End Now


10 Numbers That Show The U.S. Has Fallen Into A Horrifying Economic Depression
Ron Paul: istening to the Coronavirus 'Experts' Has Led to Death and Despair
The Unspoken Reason for Lockdowns
Lockdown Zealots Are Behaving Like Cult Members; Psychotherapist Warns
UK Govt. Totalitarian Plan to Use Media by Terrify the Population into Submission
BMJ: “Staggering number” of extra deaths in community is not explained by covid-19

Here’s why Bill Gates wants indemnity… Are you willing to take the risk?


Enzyme that will make Bill Gates’ vaccine microchip implant work known as LUCIFERASE
Why The COVID-19 Model That Inspired UK's Lockdown May Be "The Most Devastating Software Mistake Of All Time"
Italian Politician Demand Bill Gates Arrest For Crimes Against Humanity
Why American life went on as normal during the killer pandemic of 1969
PETER HITCHENS: We’re destroying the nation’s wealth – and the health of millions
French Coronavirus Strand Not From China, Hit In November
Coronavirus and Dodgy Death Numbers

If you stop the virus dead with a lockdown, how do you end
the lockdown without a resumption of the epidemic:


London's coronavirus R rate was already falling BEFORE lockdown was introduced on March 23 because of social distancing measures and policy to work from home, analysis shows

Thursday, April 30, 2020

Covid-19, and the Weird World of Ron Unz

Ron Unz, publisher of the Unz Review, a web-based collection of articles -- many by odd-ball Hitler admirers, anti-Semites, and advocates of Communism -- has run a series of posts concerning Covid-19 in which it is asserted (a) that Covid-19 is a biowarfare agent directed by the US at China, and (b) that Covid-19 is a truly terrifying disease, and that those who compare it with the seasonal flu are hoaxers. Furthermore, comments of said hoaxers are mostly, if not always, deleted from Ron's Review.

Thus, on finding a statement in an article at Zero Hedge asserting, on reliable authority, that the Covid-19 death toll has been comparable to that of the seasonal flu, I was overcome by an irresistible impulse to post it at the Unz Review, as a comment on an article by Ron himself:
Here's a quote that Ron Unz will have to delete, unless, that is, he's an honest man:

"... researchers at the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at Oxford University estimate Covid-19 to have an infection fatality rate (IFR) of between 0.1% and 0.36%. Similar to seasonal flu.

Source
Did Ron approve it?

Nah!

Here's another comment I attempted to make at Ron's Review, in response to a comment referring to a WHO tweet that was subsequently deleted:

"There is currently no evidence that people who have recovered from #COVID19 and have antibodies are protected from a second infection."
First, to say that there is no evidence of X is no evidence of of not X. But in any case the tweet [by the WHO] was deleted, so it would appear that their claim (the WHO's claim, that is) was either unsupported by evidence or known to be false.

Second, to claim, as you do, that antibodies for Covid19 are short-lived is not the same as saying they are non-existent.

Third, if antibodies to Covid19 exist -- as they must or immunological tests for the disease would be impossible -- and as even the WHO now acknowledges, that implies a degree of immunity in those who have been infected. And remember, without an immune system response, every case of Covid19 would be fatal.

The fact is, Covid19, like the flu, a virus of the same family*, is a relatively mild disease except in a minority of cases (chiefly the elderly afflicted by one or several other serious diseases).

The usual mildness of the disease is evident from the fact that although a substantial proportion of the population where serological surveys have been conducted have been shown to have been infected, the death rate as a proportion of those with antibodies is low, in the order of no more than about 0.3%. However, the antibody tests are not known to be highly reliable and the actual death rate is likely much lower. So far, the reported US death toll is just over 60,000 of 328 million Americans, and with the daily totals trending down, the total is thus unlikely to exceed 120,000. If so, the disease will prove considerably less lethal than both the Asian flu of 1957/58 that killed 70,000 of 149 million Americans, or the 1968 Hong Kong flu (H3N2 virus) that killed about 100,000 out of 200 million Americans.

Does that sound like the comment of a hoaxer, or does it sound like the sort of comment that a hoaxer might delete in order to suppress the truth?

 Yes, the Unz Review is a weird world, which deserves further scrutiny.

Related:
Vox Popoli: Facebook bans The Unz Review

Ron Unz, has said he believes the reason for his being banned on Facebook is " 

Facebook’s plans to crack down on misinformation related to our ongoing Covid-19 epidemic."
Having been banned by Ron Unz for what I assume he considered to be "misinformation related to our ongoing Covid-19 epidemic," I am inclined to think that justice has in some way been served -- not that I would consider Facebook a reliable guide to what I personally should or should not read.