That Davos Deconstructed "The Great Reset" stuff was genuinely nauseating. I really did feel like vomiting, and that was before the guy mentioned the "vomit-inducing nature" of that one advertisement he presented. (Did you get who did that advertisement? Sometimes it was hard for me to get the references. If you didn't off the top of your head, I'll go back and look again.)
I hadn't seen Prince Charles in a long, long time and it was remarkable to me how old he looks. He also at least sounded very dignified and aristocratic here. I guess we all forget how much he "marked up his playbook", if that's the correct rendition of that phrase you Brits use. If he marked up his playbook so much he would never be allowed to become monarch, he should have marked up his playbook enough not to be allowed to fiddle faddle in such dangerous global politics. I did not share the announcer's confidence in the queen to pull Charles back out of this however.
I thoroughly endorse the announcer's linking of these phenomena together, and also to the rise of China to world dominance, and the implementation of Chinese modes of governance for what we will all live under. I pull all of this apart in the same way the announcer does and arrive at the end in precisely the same place.
I wish these things weren't real. They don't feel real. Yet they are deadly real.
I don't think it is explicitly stated who created that ad. but it seems to me it must have been the World Economic Forum, whatever exactly that is.
Prince Charles seems never to have grasped the function of the Britain's constitutional monarchy, or if he did, he aimed to subvert it. Either way, he is unfit to be king. Furthermore, his eyes are much too close together.
It seems to me that the Money Power has now so invaded and occupied the public mind that it can do exactly as it pleases. Destroying jobs, destroying the savings of simple-minded workers through a new and massive blast of money creation, destroying small businesses by the million looks like the first stage of a program to vastly reduce human environmental impact by permanently crushing consumption.
Psyching the mass of people into wearing muzzles provides a useful gauge of propaganda effectiveness. As long as the sheep wear the muzzle, the conspirators know the "unique opportunity" to shaft the masses and converge with China is still good.
It is entering the mass consciousness that this is going down.
Short a miracle, too fucking bad for you, masses.
If I was in the business of miraculating, I might even hold off, to be honest. The masses have shown their true face, and it has not been one of innocence, competence, caring, or loving one another, or of virtue.
Yet there is so damned much good, so much that is great. So much I would fight to preserve if I only knew how.
I suppose the emergence of prince Charles as a face of globalization is something in which one can find hope. I mean, what hope can there be for a project reliant on the advocacy of a man who, by virtue of his advocacy, is seen to be a traitor to his own nation.
The British voted to leave the EU because they wished to remain an independent, self-governing democratic nation state. The British support the monarchy because it symbolize the nation and their pride in it. They support the work of the Royal Family in connection with the British Commonwealth because the British are an amiable people to whom the idea of Britain as friend of all the world, or at least big chunks of it, appeals.
Globalization is thus anathema to I would say a huge proportion of the British population. By allowing himself to be used as spokesperson for an anti-democratic takeover of the world by a a bunch of billionaires Charles has surely sealed his own fate.
The first King Charles of England was deemed the wisest fool in Christendom. The second King charles of England was such a fool as to provoke a civil war leading to his own execution. The prospective third King Charles is proving to be such an unwise fool that his accession to the throne will surely be in some manner prevented.
"The first King Charles of England was deemed the wisest fool in Christendom. The second King charles of England was such a fool as to provoke a civil war leading to his own execution."
I realize this is not the main point, but this history is quite garbled, and garbled enough to detract from the argument. You've gotten your Stuarts completely confused. It may be better to just delete the paragraph.
"The Division of Elections wants voters to know that recently, a court decided that voters do not need to have their by mail ballot witnessed. This is only for the November 2020 general election. Voters must still sign and provide an identifier on the back of the envelope. It is recommended for voters to date their signature.
For more information please see the press release."
I remember when I was fifteen and my friends and I were discussing what we'd do if we thought the world was ending tomorrow. We agreed we'd make sure to get laid. I succeeded in that in the meantime, and that isn't on my mind now at all.
I also succeeded in loving. That's what's on my mind now, loving.
I take some hope in the general contempt of young people for masked fools and charlatans pushing the Covid terror campaign. Yes, Covid is a nasty flu-like illness, and yes at my age, it could be lethal. But for young people it is little worse than a nasty cold and therefore I am pleased to see that young people are treating with contempt the efforts to destroy their lives with lockdowns, quarantines school closures and the rest.
"The pandemic is continuing to take a toll on higher education, with U.S. undergraduate enrollment dropping 4%, according to the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. Most of the move came from a sharp decline in first-year students, who were down 16%, as potential students face mounting concerns over finances, traveling to areas where virus cases are high or studying online. The declines were even steeper at community colleges, where there was a 9.4% overall drop and a 22.7% fall in first-year students. Graduate enrollment picked up slightly, however."
One thing I note, or I should say assume, is the schools with large endowments are the least threatened. The private colleges with no endowments are at risk of imploding.
Rowan claims he is a billionaire. According to Forbes Magazine, Bono has a net worth of 700 million. I call that close enough. How does a guy like that get that rich? See, what I see is charity is the way to go...You can do no wrong, people love you for it, and it is in no way incompatible with growing your wealth.
Back in 2005 when Bono and Bill Gates shared "Person of the Year" and a cover on Time magazine, Bono had a net worth of 150 million, according to Time. In the last fifteen years he has increased his net worth by 4.7 times. Phenomenal. Phenomenal what this society lavishly rewards. I do not see it as merit.
If you're really smart you can use that charitable foundation which seems so saintly and kind and leverage the influence you are buying to become maybe one of the most powerful people in the world, as we see Bill Gates has done. (At least in appearance, assuming he isn't run.)
When that 2005 Time edition came out, I saw the coupling of Gates and Bono as contrived and I wondered why. I knew Gates and Bono really had very little to do with each other, at least on the surface. Now, especially right now, it is beginning to make much more sense.
That Davos Deconstructed "The Great Reset" stuff was genuinely nauseating. I really did feel like vomiting, and that was before the guy mentioned the "vomit-inducing nature" of that one advertisement he presented. (Did you get who did that advertisement? Sometimes it was hard for me to get the references. If you didn't off the top of your head, I'll go back and look again.)
ReplyDeleteI hadn't seen Prince Charles in a long, long time and it was remarkable to me how old he looks. He also at least sounded very dignified and aristocratic here. I guess we all forget how much he "marked up his playbook", if that's the correct rendition of that phrase you Brits use. If he marked up his playbook so much he would never be allowed to become monarch, he should have marked up his playbook enough not to be allowed to fiddle faddle in such dangerous global politics. I did not share the announcer's confidence in the queen to pull Charles back out of this however.
I thoroughly endorse the announcer's linking of these phenomena together, and also to the rise of China to world dominance, and the implementation of Chinese modes of governance for what we will all live under. I pull all of this apart in the same way the announcer does and arrive at the end in precisely the same place.
I wish these things weren't real. They don't feel real. Yet they are deadly real.
I don't think it is explicitly stated who created that ad. but it seems to me it must have been the World Economic Forum, whatever exactly that is.
DeletePrince Charles seems never to have grasped the function of the Britain's constitutional monarchy, or if he did, he aimed to subvert it. Either way, he is unfit to be king. Furthermore, his eyes are much too close together.
It seems to me that the Money Power has now so invaded and occupied the public mind that it can do exactly as it pleases. Destroying jobs, destroying the savings of simple-minded workers through a new and massive blast of money creation, destroying small businesses by the million looks like the first stage of a program to vastly reduce human environmental impact by permanently crushing consumption.
Psyching the mass of people into wearing muzzles provides a useful gauge of propaganda effectiveness. As long as the sheep wear the muzzle, the conspirators know the "unique opportunity" to shaft the masses and converge with China is still good.
Yeah, man, we're fucking dead.
DeleteIt is entering the mass consciousness that this is going down.
Short a miracle, too fucking bad for you, masses.
If I was in the business of miraculating, I might even hold off, to be honest. The masses have shown their true face, and it has not been one of innocence, competence, caring, or loving one another, or of virtue.
Yet there is so damned much good, so much that is great. So much I would fight to preserve if I only knew how.
"Yeah, man, we're fucking dead."
DeleteI suppose the emergence of prince Charles as a face of globalization is something in which one can find hope. I mean, what hope can there be for a project reliant on the advocacy of a man who, by virtue of his advocacy, is seen to be a traitor to his own nation.
The British voted to leave the EU because they wished to remain an independent, self-governing democratic nation state. The British support the monarchy because it symbolize the nation and their pride in it. They support the work of the Royal Family in connection with the British Commonwealth because the British are an amiable people to whom the idea of Britain as friend of all the world, or at least big chunks of it, appeals.
Globalization is thus anathema to I would say a huge proportion of the British population. By allowing himself to be used as spokesperson for an anti-democratic takeover of the world by a a bunch of billionaires Charles has surely sealed his own fate.
The first King Charles of England was deemed the wisest fool in Christendom. The second King charles of England was such a fool as to provoke a civil war leading to his own execution. The prospective third King Charles is proving to be such an unwise fool that his accession to the throne will surely be in some manner prevented.
This comment has been removed by the author.
Delete"The first King Charles of England was deemed the wisest fool in Christendom. The second King charles of England was such a fool as to provoke a civil war leading to his own execution."
DeleteI realize this is not the main point, but this history is quite garbled, and garbled enough to detract from the argument. You've gotten your Stuarts completely confused. It may be better to just delete the paragraph.
"The Division of Elections wants voters to know that recently, a court decided that voters do not need to have their by mail ballot witnessed. This is only for the November 2020 general election. Voters must still sign and provide an identifier on the back of the envelope. It is recommended for voters to date their signature.
ReplyDeleteFor more information please see the press release."
-- from noreply@alaska.gov
I remember when I was fifteen and my friends and I were discussing what we'd do if we thought the world was ending tomorrow. We agreed we'd make sure to get laid. I succeeded in that in the meantime, and that isn't on my mind now at all.
ReplyDeleteI also succeeded in loving. That's what's on my mind now, loving.
I take some hope in the general contempt of young people for masked fools and charlatans pushing the Covid terror campaign. Yes, Covid is a nasty flu-like illness, and yes at my age, it could be lethal. But for young people it is little worse than a nasty cold and therefore I am pleased to see that young people are treating with contempt the efforts to destroy their lives with lockdowns, quarantines school closures and the rest.
DeleteI will never wear a mask again. God love you, brother.
Delete"The pandemic is continuing to take a toll on higher education, with U.S. undergraduate enrollment dropping 4%, according to the National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. Most of the move came from a sharp decline in first-year students, who were down 16%, as potential students face mounting concerns over finances, traveling to areas where virus cases are high or studying online. The declines were even steeper at community colleges, where there was a 9.4% overall drop and a 22.7% fall in first-year students. Graduate enrollment picked up slightly, however."
ReplyDeleteOne thing I note, or I should say assume, is the schools with large endowments are the least threatened. The private colleges with no endowments are at risk of imploding.
There's that damned Bono again.
ReplyDeleteRowan claims he is a billionaire. According to Forbes Magazine, Bono has a net worth of 700 million. I call that close enough. How does a guy like that get that rich? See, what I see is charity is the way to go...You can do no wrong, people love you for it, and it is in no way incompatible with growing your wealth.
Back in 2005 when Bono and Bill Gates shared "Person of the Year" and a cover on Time magazine, Bono had a net worth of 150 million, according to Time. In the last fifteen years he has increased his net worth by 4.7 times. Phenomenal. Phenomenal what this society lavishly rewards. I do not see it as merit.
If you're really smart you can use that charitable foundation which seems so saintly and kind and leverage the influence you are buying to become maybe one of the most powerful people in the world, as we see Bill Gates has done. (At least in appearance, assuming he isn't run.)
When that 2005 Time edition came out, I saw the coupling of Gates and Bono as contrived and I wondered why. I knew Gates and Bono really had very little to do with each other, at least on the surface. Now, especially right now, it is beginning to make much more sense.