Why US Oligarchs and the Democratic Party Are Attempting a Coup d'Etat Against Trump

The following was written in December 2016, immediately after the election of Donald Trump as President of the United States, when it seemed possible to believe that Trump ("wouldn't it be nice if we actually got along with the Russians")represented an alternative to the globalist scheme for world empire. Events have proved that on the contrary, Trump is simply a more militaristic replacement for the former frontmen for world empire, the Rapist-in-Chief, the Bush, the Shrubs and the wannabe Hillary. or as H.L. Mencken said of FDR, Trump, is simply "a fraud from snout to tail." That, however, does not invalidate the thrust of the following commentary, which deals with the plan for the take-down and dismemberment of Russia as a preliminary to a shoot-out with China.

In 1971, when the Soviet Union was at the height of its power, the fear in the West was of Soviet tanks rolling Westward to the Atlantic, leaving the United States with the choice of resolving the issue either by means of an all out nuclear war, or accepting Russian global hegemony.

To counter the threat, the US gave diplomatic recognition to Red China, the implication being: if Russia moved West, China, with US support, would move West also, to regain vast swaths of territory and the underlying energy and mineral resources lost to Russia under the, so-called, unequal treaties of the 19th Century.

Today Russia is weak, but China is strong and rapidly growing stronger. To the plutocratic class, both in America and China, Russia's weakness creates a golden opportunity: an opportunity to strip Putin's circle of crony capitalists of the vast resource wealth of Russia. Or as Canadian wannabe oligarch, Conrad Black wrote in the National Post:

The West must always resist oppression, and must now embrace and assist its friends in Ukraine, not only from compassion for them, but to bring closer the adherence of Holy Mother Russia to the West and to stretch the West from the Americas across the Eurasian land mass to the Far East and Australasia.

A statement that, as we wrote earlier, when stripped of the motherhood phrases about resisting oppression, assisting friends, etc., amounts to a clear statement of New World Order policy, i.e.:

the unrelenting assimilation of the former Soviet Empire in successive slices. First the Soviet satellites were assimilated by the EU and NATO, then the Baltic states, then the Balkans, now is the turn of Ukraine, to be followed most likely by Belarus, and then the Caucuses, and on, and on.

A policy that, as we explained, is to be accomplished:

By a new kind of imperialism as spelled out years ago in a newspaper article by Tony Blair’s then foreign policy advisor, Robert Cooper.

The most logical way to deal with chaos, and the one employed most often in the past, is colonisation. But this is unacceptable to postmodern states. Empire and imperialism are words that have become a form of abuse and no colonial powers are willing to take on the job, though the opportunities – perhaps even the need – for colonisation is as great as it ever was in the nineteenth century. Those left out of the global economy risk falling into a vicious circle. Weak government means disorder and that means falling investment.

All the conditions for imperialism are there, but both the supply and demand for imperialism have dried up. And yet a world in which the efficient and well-governed export stability and liberty seems eminently desirable.

What is needed is a new kind of imperialism, one compatible with human rights and cosmopolitan values: an imperialism which aims to bring order and organisation but which rests today on the voluntary principle.

We already have voluntary imperialism of the global economy through institutions such as the IMF and the World Bank. These multilateral institutions provide help to states wishing to find their way back into the global economy and into the virtuous circle of investment and prosperity. In return they make demands which, they hope, address the political and economic failures that have contributed to the original need for assistance.

Other tactics include provoking the legitimate authorities to violence against agitators, if necessary using sharpshooters to kill demonstrators and police* to excite the mob to a state of hysteria and the police or military to a state of trigger-happy anger.

Then, if all else fails, resort is made to the NWO standby policies of economic blockade such as cost half a million children’s lives in Iraq under the Clinton administration, and R-2-P, the alleged responsibility to protect allegedly oppressed people, a totally non-existent principal of international law, deployed to justify murderous aerial bombardment of any government that remains standing after prolonged internal subversion from abroad, e.g., Saddam’s Iraq, Gaddhafi’s Libya, or Assad’s Syria.

Again, forget the self-justifying verbiage about, for example, “The most logical way to deal with chaos,” which assumes that which has to be demonstrated, namely, that one county or imperialist block has the right, let alone the responsibility, to determine the future of another. And forget the crocodile tears about weak government meaning falling investment, which actually refers to the profit opportunities currently denied to international finance, which drives the NWO. Then you have a plain statement of the new imperialist strategy, which is to provoke, within target states, a popular demand, or at least the appearance of a popular demand, for “human rights and cosmopolitan values,” which is to say, promotion of homosexuality and every other form of non-reproductive recreational sex, pornography and Western atheistic decadence, to be undertaken in parallel with the covert multi-billion-dollar financing of opposition groups headed by fifth columnists with an eye to the main chance.

Other tactics include provoking the legitimate authorities to violence against agitators, if necessary using sharpshooters to kill demonstrators and police to excite the mob to a state of hysteria and the police or military to a state of trigger-happy anger.

Then, if all else fails, resort is made to the NWO standby policies of economic blockade such as cost half a million children’s lives in Iraq under the Clinton administration, and R-2-P, the alleged responsibility to protect allegedly oppressed people, a totally non-existent principal of international law, deployed to justify murderous aerial bombardment of any government that remains standing after prolonged internal subversion from abroad, e.g., Saddam’s Iraq, Gaddhafi’s Libya, or Assad’s Syria.

There is basic flaw, however, in the plan for the breakup and looting of Russia, which is that China is now the greatest long-term threat to US global hegemony, not Russia. What that means is that the Soros/Bezos/Google/McCain/etc., plan for the rape an pillage of Russia risks handing the whole game to China.

What then to do? The West should adjust its relationship with Russia. By partnering with Russia, Euro-America is invulnerable for the foreseeable future to any threat to their security that China might pose.

The adjustment can be made at a moment's notice. Russia has made it clear: (a)  that it has no hostile intent toward the West, for otherwise, they would have responded to the Western sponsored anti-Russian aggression in South Ossetia and the anti-Russia coup in Kiev, by restoring to Russian rule the entirety of both Georgia and Ukraine, something that the West would have been powerless to prevent; and (b) that it shares with the majority of citizens of both the United States and Europe the desire to see the West remain a region of sovereign nation states, not a genocidal tyranny intent on exterminating the European peoples by the current policy of suppressed indigenous reproduction and mass replacement immigration.

There are two reasons, however, why the US has until now refused to take this obvious and necessary step.

First, the US Democrats and their oligarchic backers, who lead the drive for a New World Order cannot tolerate Russia's commitment to either preserving the Russian nation or restoring the Russian Orthodox Church. The globalist cabal that controls the Clinton's, the Obama's and the EU elite are intent on destroying both the Christian faith and the racial and cultural identities of the European peoples, including obviously, America's European majority.

Second, is the matter of sheer greed. Russia is a cornucopia ripe for the looting: vast tracts of land, beautiful white women, gigantic energy and mineral wealth. What plutocrat will not demand someone else's sons and daughters fight to get them a piece of that?

But money is not the only form of power. It is the military that have to do the imperialists' dirty work, in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Yemen, Somalia, and potentially on a gigantic scale, against Russia in Ukraine or elsewhere. And it is the military that has the option of landing a fleet of black helicopters on the White House lawn, arresting the occupant and shooting anyone who gets in their way.

Amazingly, Trump, the anti-anti-Russian, won the election with an assist from Hillary who  demonstrated unexpected stupidity throughout the campaign.

But, for the oligarchs, nothing could be more outrageous than being defeated by the will of the goddamn people. Hence the push-back and the counteraction.

Already Trump has declared the word of the CIA on Russian hacking to be null and void: they are, he has pointed out —the CIA that is: "the same people who said Saddam had WMD's". That's a declaration of war. What can he do now other than "splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the winds" to quote another President who wouldn't wage war on Russia.

Which means Donald Trump cannot be sure of becoming President of the United States until after the inauguration. And even then he will be living from day to day, not knowing where or when a "lone nut" may blow his brains out.

But if he survives, watch for a new alignment in the global balance of power. Hope, even, perhaps for the survival of the white race and the Christian faith.

Related:

Moon of Alabama: The "Elite" Coup Of 2016

Justin Raimondo: top the CIA Coup

Kissinger warns against pre-judging Donald Trump



Zero Hedge: There's A Psy-Op, All Right; But It Isn't "The Russians"

IWB: The CIA Says They Did NOT TELL The WASHINGTON POST That “Russia Hacked Election In Favor Of Trump”!

TruePundit: CIA: Washington Post Report Linking Russian Government to Trump & Election Hacking Is “Outright Lie”

John Rappoport: The sequence by which major media went stark raving mad