Gender Studies Versus Quantum Physics

Hearing Richard Feynman talking of quantum physics, I am reminded of his view that university degrees in some of the softer disciplines offered at the university, Home Economics for example, might not be fully equivalent in difficulty of attainment to degrees in, say mathematics or physics.

Today, most universities seem to have phased out Home Ec., but with the rise of Womens' Studies, Gender Studies and other "Studies" programs, universities now seem to offer even more soft options than in Feynman's day. That some of these programs are entirely vacuous is rather clearly demonstrated by this report on what passes for scholarship at the mushier edge of the academic community.

 

For those interested in deciding for themselves the validity of present-day academic research in the "gender studies" field, here's a link to one such contribution, as it happens a spoof paper, that was accepted and published in a peer-reviewed journal published by Springer, an old-established publisher of scholarly journals.

Another European Treason Party Leader Bites the Dust

Dispute over migration brings down Belgian government Belgium’s liberal prime minister Charles Michel has resigned in the wake of a bitter falling out with his erstwhile Flemish coalition partner. ... The [Flemish NVA] party objected to Mr Michel’s support for what it claimed was a legally binding UN compact on migration, which was approved at a summit of 180 states in Marrakesh last Monday. The Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration is a first attempt at the UN to agree a common global approach to migration but was seen by populists as too sympathetic to migrants. Bart de Wever, leader of the NVA and the mayor of Antwerp, attacked the compact which he claimed, although non-binding, “will serve as an argument in court”. The NVA ... argued that the compact would undermine the government’s tough stance against illegal migrants. The Irish Times

Naturally the UN wants open borders world-wide. Open borders will destroy the nation state and lead to the creation of a world empire under the control of the corrupt bureaucratic idiots who run the UN.

Fortunately, it ain't gonna happen. 

The more loudly the UN and it's Treason Party allies in the Western nations agitate for the Western nations to open their borders the poverty-stricken masses without, the more aware the people have become of the traitors within their ranks who smear opponents of national destruction as racist. 

What the gilets jaunes of France, the Flemish nationalists of Belgium, the Build-the-Wall Trumpsters, and indeed the great majority in every Western nation now see is that they have been targeted by the UN and their globalist allies for genocide both as racial groups and as distinct cultural entities with a unique history and religious tradition.  

What the people of the world's poorest nations need to demand is not that they be allowed to enter and impoverish the rich countries, but that their own lands, which possess vast natural resources be properly governed. Why, for example, should 400 million Latin Americans be granted the unrestricted freedom to migrate to North America when they have a continent of their own no more densely populated than North America and with natural wealth that is at least comparable. Ditto Africa, a continent of vast natural riches, three times the size of China with only two-thirds of China's population.

What's needed is not to diversify the successful countries with countless millions from failed states, but for the failed states to pay attention to the way the Western nations got rich, which was primarily through adherence to the rule of law, democracy, and market capitalism. The Latin American, African and Muslim states should boot their corrupt oligarchs and dictators and give the Western approach to government a try.

Related:

Is Trudeau next?

Globalist Elite to EuroAmerican White Trash

What this guy is not saying is:

(1) Migrants take below-minimum-wage jobs in the cash (untaxed) economy, which means bigger profits for son-of-a-bitch employers like me.

(2) In a World of seven billion mostly very poor people, there's a potential immigrant better qualified for almost every job in the UK, Canada and the rest of the developed world than the existing job holder — including mister Fat-Cat Son-of-a-Bitch himself.

(3) Or as Mr. Fat-Cat Son-of-a-Bitch is really saying:

"I don't give a shit about destroying the European peoples, as racial and cultural entities, I just want cheap labor, so fuck off you anti-immigrant racist."

Theresa May Got One Thing Right: Tony Blair Is An Interferring Jackass

In an astonishing broadside, [Theresa May] lashed out at her predecessor’s treacherous trip to meet EU chiefs in Brussels while Brexit talks were taking place. “For Tony Blair to go to Brussels and seek to undermine our negotiations by advocating for a second referendum is an insult to the office he once held and the British people he once served. “We cannot, as he would, abdicate responsibility for this decision. Parliament has a democratic duty to deliver what the British people voted for.” The Sun

May also "reminded Blair that it was his own open-door immigration policy which spurred millions of Britons to vote to leave the European Union." However, those for Brexit should never for a moment forget that May, hereself, is a Remainer and hence no opponent of of the EU's own open-door immigration policy, a policy now driving the EU into a state of internal strife and disintegration.

And writing in today's Daily Mail, former Finance Minister Lord Nigel Lawson writes of Blair:

A recent poll showed that only two per cent of the British population have a 'very favourable' opinion of Mr Blair. It is the sort of approval rating a mass-murderer might be expected to get — which happens to be how many members of his own party describe him, in the wake of the Iraq war. Daily Mail

Why Paris is Burning Down

Trump blames the Yellow Jacket riots in France on the Paris Agreement to Combat Climate Change, an international agreement mandating massive public expenditures to combat what are alleged to be climate-changing emissions of carbon dioxide.

But French generals beg to differ as to the cause of France's civil unrest, warning Macron that signing the UN Pact on Migration will be an act of treason.

Specifically, the generals state:

By deciding alone to sign this pact, you would add an additional reason for revolt to the anger of an already battered people. You would be guilty of a denial of democracy or treason against the nation.

What next? Will the generals place the traitor under arrest?

Meantime, the French police union has declared its solidarity with the gilets jaunes.



It's difficult to see how France can avoid a new revolution unless Macron, the former Rothschild banker and globalist stooge, is ousted without further delay.

As to the rest of the gang of globalist traitors, Merkel is heading out the door, Thereason May is on the ropes, and Trudeau's perpetual asininity will surely terminate his disaster- and humiliation-strewn reign when Canada votes next year.

But nationalists would be foolish to claim victory any time soon. All political parties in the West have been co-opted by the globalist Money Power, so whoever replaces the current batch of traitors is unlikely to undertake any meaningful change of direction unless subject to continual challenge.

Otherwise, the destruction of the Western nations as  cultural and racial entities will continue, with programs of suppressed reproduction combined with mass replacement immigration. Thus, in Canada, Trudeau, via the Canadian state broadcaster, the CBC, advocates for further reduction in the fertility of the already reproductively dysfunctional Canadian population, while calling for ever more rapid immigration. And in Britain, non-European immigration this year has reached a peak not seen since the days of the Traitor Tony Blair whose government accelerated non-European immigration to, so they said privately,  "rub the noses of the Right in multiculturalism," which is just another way of saying to destroy the British people and erase their cultural and religious traditions.

Meantime in South Africa the Rise of Good Racism:

If you don't believe our rulers support white genocide, just listen to the silence from May, Merkel, Micron and Trudeau among others about the call for white genocide in South Africa.

Related:

Daily Star: Yellow Vests in London

Scott Adams challenges Google to show that they have not maliciously, and criminally, targeted his reputation for destruction

The evidence: This Google image search "for Scott Adams". Donald Trump might issue the same challenge: see this Google image search for "idiot".

Google uses location data that puts entire ZIP codes in politically biased 'filter bubbles'

DuckDuckGo — a privacy-focused search engine company that competes with Google Search— released a study last week that claims Google is inadvertently introducing bias into its results.

"Google's collection and use of personal data, including location, which is then used to filter specific search results, is having an effect akin to the effects of a political bias," DuckDuckGo CEO Gabriel Weinberg told Business Insider on Tuesday.

The company's study found participants saw vast differences in search results when searching for the same keywords (like "gun control" or "immigration") from different locations across the country.

Full story

Why Islam Should Be Banned in the Western World

The Freedom and Direct Democracy party of the Czech Republic has called for a complete ban on Islam.

Speaking in the Czech Parliament, party member, Jiri Kobza, stated that Islam is a colonizing ideology that promotes violence and hatred.

That is the case. Muslims in Europe are settlers and colonizers who work with traitors in government such as Tony Blair, whose "Justice Minister" called for a British parliament solely of Muslims, Theresa May, an advocate for Sharia courts in Britain, and Justin Trudeau, a warm advocate for Canada's Islamists, including ISIS Jihadis.



Islam is not merely a religion. It is a political system that is incompatible with free society. As Winston Churchill stated:

The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.”

“Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyzes the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.

The spread of Islam to the Western nations represents and existential threat to free society and should be resisted by all means.

Meantime:

The European Court of Human Rights ruled that criticism of Muhammad constitutes incitement to hatred

But if you want to piss on Christ, no prob.

Related

Is the UK Ready for a Muslim Takeover Prime Minister

 

CanSpeccy: Are you a far-right-wing extremist, racist, anti-Semite against the genocide of your own race and nation?

Russia Insider: Yellow Vest Rising in Europe a US-Incited Color Revolution

Five Lies Sundar Pichai, the Shit CEO of Google Just Told

Google CEO Sundar Pichai testified on Tuesday before the House Judiciary Committee. Despite testifying under oath, Pichai’s statements were riddled with demonstrable falsehoods — here are some of Pichai’s biggest whoppers.

1. The Google CEO leads the company “without political bias”
2. Google did not try and turn out Latino voters in key states
3. Users can opt out of Google’s invasive tracking services
4. Google does not discriminate against competitors
5. Google has diverse perspectives

See the details here

Related:

Google CEO Gets Grilled During Congressional Hearing

Ding-Dong, the Witch Isn't Dead. May Lives to Ruin Brexit

By James Delingpole

Against all reason, Theresa May – the worst Prime Minister in British history – has yet again survived an attempt to boot her out of office.

This has nothing to do with her merits: she has none.

It is entirely due to the short-termism, cowardice and depressing lack of soundness among all those Conservative MPs who voted to keep her in office – despite being perfectly aware (as who can not be?) that she is a lame duck Prime Minister causing little but harm and embarrassment to her party, her electorate and her country.

All day in the run up to the vote, May’s MPs have been dressing up their pusillanimity and self-serving weaselry as a mix of pragmatism, patriotism and high principle.

Read more

Trump Prepares for 2020

Source

Global Warming humbugs with private jets

The DCNF asked 31 businesses, foundations and individuals agitating for climate action if they’d support banning private jets. Most companies and individuals the DCNF reached out to did not respond, including Facebook, Apple, Google and other companies that often tout their “green image.” Not even former Vice President Al Gore, the father of climate activism, responded to TheDCNF’s question. In fact, all but two of the 26 corporations were silent when asked by TheDCNF if they would support a ban on private jets to help cut greenhouse gas emissions in line with what the United Nations says is needed to meet the Paris accord. The Daily Caller

My "12 Rules for Life": No. 2, SHOW LEADERSHIP — MANAGE YOURSELF

 Anyone who has had the task of reviewing applications for entry-level non-managerial employment will be aware of how many inexperienced people boast of their leadership skills. Moreover, anyone experienced in dealing with those newly recruited to the world of employment will likely have come across the novice intent on assuming direction of the operation within days of joining the team. An example that comes to mind is America's latest political sensation, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, already, it seems, running for President.

Such naive eagerness to lead is generally unappreciated by those with actual responsibility for the smooth operation of an administrative process or the turning of a profit. Rather, what is most valued is intelligent self-regulation to fulfill the objectives laid down by those with actual responsibility for end results. Thus, the leadership skill most appreciated by management is the capacity for leadership of an army of one, namely oneself.

Self-regulation is not a simple matter. Hard work is, well, hard. The temptation to break for a snack,  to check the Internet, or to engage co-workers in chat is at times all but irresistible. Moreover, to work effectively, one must be adequately prepared, both physically and mentally. That means no late nights or heavy drinking from Sunday to Thursday. It also means thinking in advance of how best to tackle the work ahead.

How, then, given the sensations, emotions and rationalizations that flood the mind, is one to achieve consistent self-mastery? To that question, one might expect psychology to have an answer, which indeed it does, although not necessarily the correct one. Indeed, psychology has, during the modern era, taken three shots at defining the springs of human action, the first two unquestionable duds. First, was the Freudian unconscious mind, now correctly written off as a farrago of fantastic nonsense. Then there was the much more scientific-seeming theory known as behaviorism, that held human action to be the product of reflexes induced by specific experiential regimes.

My "12 Rules for Life," No. 1: CUT OUT SUGAR

A hundred years ago, Americans consumed an average of ten pounds of sugar a year. Today they consume an average of one hundred and ten pounds, or 50 kilograms, of sugar a year. That is close to 100% of the healthy weight of a a woman of average height, and provides about one third of the calories required to meet the needs of most North American adults.

What is the result of making sugar the largest single component of the diet? An epidemic of obesity, diabetes, and general disability, including a lack of both physical fitness and mental sharpness. Yes, it's a fact, diabetes lowers your IQ. Rome it has been suggested fell because of lead in the water. The Western World is surely headed for demise because of surfeit of sugar.

Cutting sugar from your diet is not easy. First, because sugar is addictive. Second, because sugar is added to almost every kind of processed food you can buy, which makes it difficult to eliminate from your diet even if you try. There are two compelling reasons why sugar is in almost every processed food item: because, first, as an addictive substance, it tends to hook you on whatever branded product to which it is added; and second, it is one of the cheapest food commodities there is, and thus ideal for bulking up more expensive ingredients.

Vivre Les Gilets Jaunes: Or How the Plebs Are Turning on the Globalist Elites

For years we have lived in a climate of ‘You can’t say that’. You can’t criticise mass immigration — that’s xenophobia. You can’t oppose the EU — that’s Europhobia. You can’t raise concerns about radical Islam — that’s Islamophobia. You can’t agitate against climate-change policy — that’s climate-change denialism, on a par with Holocaust denialism, and anyone who dares to bristle against eco-orthodoxy deserves to be cast out of polite society. And yet now, in this populist moment, people are daring to say precisely these unsayable things. They’re standing up to the EU. They’re demanding that immigration become a democratic concern rather than something worked out for us by unaccountable bureaucrats in Brussels. And now they’re even grating against the hitherto unquestionable religious-style diktat that we must all drive less, shop less and do less in order to ‘save the planet’. Brendan O'Neill, Spectator Blogs

Instead of the confident leader, lecturing and preening on the global stage, [Macron] is barricaded in his palace, a sort of latter-day Marie Antoinette. French people can’t afford diesel? Let them buy Teslas. Jonathan Miller, Spectator Blogs

CBC Warns Trudeau He Risks Yellow Jacket Rebellion with His Contempt for the Canadian Nation

Amazingly, even the hyper-Liberal Canadian state broadcaster, the CBC, grasps that Justin Trudeau's globalist contempt for what he considers the passé Canadian nation, invites rebellion. Thus in an article illustrated with images of yellow-vested French rioters, they write:

In an astonishing statement to the New York Times in 2015, Justin Trudeau declared, "There is no core identity, no mainstream in Canada,'' and consequently that "makes us the first post-national state." ... One only has to look to recent events in France and the European project, in general, with Brexit a clue as to why nations are no longer keen on abandoning their autonomy for the lofty ambitions of leaders on the world stage. ... Brian Mulroney, one of our nation's elder statesmen, recently offered Trudeau some wisdom: It's the job of the Canadian prime minister to look after Canada first and the rest of the world next. Source: CBC

Deep State Treason

By James Howard Kunstler

... the Obama White House, along with CIA director John Brennan, and Director of National intel James Clapper, used the FBI and the DOJ (with support from the nation’s two leading newspapers), and help from Britain’s MI6 intel shop, to run illegal operations against Mr. Trump during the 2016 election, and then persisted in acts to delegitimize him after Jan 20, 2017.

Read article

Germany: The Face of the New Genocide

Anetta Kahane is a former secret police informer for the Communist 

Government of East Germany. She now heads Germany's cyber spy 

force charged with rooting out Nazi's, as identified by such signs as

sending the daughters to school with braided hair, or of having 

athletic sons. 

Anetta Kahane (Right), a one time informer for the Communist Government of East Germany, now heads Mutti Merkel's cyber spies, tasked with rooting out Nazis.

Frau Merkel, like Kahane, is a former East German citizen and Communist who served as secretary for "Agitation and Propaganda" in the youth wing of the East German Academy of Sciences.

Apparently, Kahane's agency is able to identify Nazis by noting such things as who sends their daughters to school with braided hair or who have athletic sons.

Kahane, so Breitbart reports, is "a fanatic supporter of open borders and has declared it vital that the European Union change its immigration policy so as to eventually make natives of the continent a minority."

Time for the Germans, what's left of them, to get a few million of those gilets jaunes.

Theresa May's Theresonous Brexit Deal

This "deal" will cost the British taxpayer £60 billion; require that the British still comply with EU rules without having any say in what those will be, and worst of all, it permits the British to leave the EU only if the EU agrees. It commits the British effectively to subjugation by the EU in perpetuity, with no recourse should the British change their mind. It is a prison. It is also the first step of the EU toward its dream of global governance: unaccountable, untransparent, unelected by the public, and with no way out. David Brown, Gatestone Institute

What's the alternative? No deal, obviously. Without a "deal," the UK's membership of the EU will lapse on March 29, 2019, without, according to the House of Lords, any legal obligation for the UK to make any payment to the EU. After that, the UK should just trade with the EU on a tit-for-tat basis. The EU with an $11 billion trade surplus with the UK is not going to screw its own exporters by putting tariffs on British Biscuits and Whiskey if that means equal tariffs on German cars and French wine.

As for Ireland, yes there'll have to be a border between North and South to protect the UK from uncontrolled migration, unless of course, the Irish decide to exit the EU and enter into a migration control agreement with the UK. This the Brits should encourage, for example by offering to pay 90% or more of the cost of a bridge between Ireland and Britain, thereby making it possible to drive all the way from Dublin, via the Channel Tunnel, to Paris, Berlin and Beijing.

Maybe the Irish would even consider a highly devolved political union with the UK to create an independent Federation of the British Isles: a federation to preserve and perpetuate the languages and cultures of the ancient nations of England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales — a friend-of-all-the-World, without entangling alliances, a danger to none but those who would harm her, for which purpose Britain's independent nuclear deterrent would be retained pending a safer means to insure national security.

Related: 

Mish: UK Debates the Meaning of "Temporary" as Legal Review Reviews Permanent Trap

Vox Pop: parliament betrays the British people

We've Called Theresa May Thereason May for Some Time. Here's the Proof She's a Traitor

The May Government was found in contempt of Parliament for failing to reveal to Parliament the advice it had received on May's Brexit "deal" with the EU. Thus compelled, the government released a portion, though not all, of the advice it had received on May's Brexit deal. From what has been released it is apparent, as related in this Spectator blog post, that the "deal" is an absolute betrayal of the public who voted to leave the European Union.

1. This is not the full legal advice on the May’s deal. It is a very selective piece of advice solely on the Protocol, art. 184 and 5. So no other issues are considered. Parliament asked for the full legal advice on the deal, not just part of the deal. Where is it?

2. May’s deal envisages the UK being in backstop indefinitely. It is staggering that she sought to conceal this advice from MPs or the public. “The Protocol is intended to subsist even when negotiations have clearly broken down…. despite statements in the Protocol that it is not intended to be permanent, and the clear intention of the parties that it should be replaced by alternative, permanent arrangements, in international law the Protocol would endure indefinitely. It is May’s duty to inform parliament in unambiguous terms. How can she claim to have fulfilled this duty? (Para. 16)

3. The backstop is not an insurance. It is the expected destination. Remember when we were told that the backstop is “just an insurance”, that it was unlikely that we’d need it? The legal advice makes clear that the backstop is both likely and in full contemplation of the parties (Para. 5). So everyone knows we are likely to go in. It is wholly wrong to for the government to pretend otherwise.

4. May says that promising to negotiate ‘in good faith’ will result in a future deal. The legal advice accepts that this phrase is meaningless. Her deal places the EU under no obligation at all. “All they [the EU] would have to do to show good faith would be to consider the UK’s proposals, even if they ultimately rejected them. This could go on repeatedly without such conduct giving rise to “bad faith” or failure to use best endeavours.”

5. The UK will never be able to leave the Customs Union without the EU’s agreement. May’s deal “does not provide for a mechanism that is likely to enable the UK lawfully to exit the UK wide customs union without a subsequent agreement.” And as for the time limit? Forget it. “This remains the case even if parties are still negotiating many years later, and even if the parties believe that talks have clearly broken down and there is no prospect of a future relationship agreement. The resolution of such a stalemate would have to be political.”

6. May’s deal may violate EU law. Under Article 50, the mechanisms that EU member states are allowed to leave, a transition agreement cannot be open-ended because that means it is not temporary. So this dodgy backstop might be illegal under EU law. “There may be, therefore, some doubt as to whether the proposed Protocol is consistent with EU law, and that uncertainly will increase the longer it subsists.”

7. The EU may have the power to tap the UK for even more money given the expense of the ties that will still bind us. “The legal and administrative arrangements required to underpin the Protocol would be enormously complex, particularly in the light of proposed GB / NI flexibilities and will require considerable resources. These are not something to which the Commission will readily commit in the long term.”

8. The UK has no proper legal protection so is being asked to ‘trust’ the EU. “Given the lack of any effective means of termination” to the backstop, “the UK may have to trust in seeking a satisfactory outcome from negotiations.”

9. The ‘arbitration panel’ is useless in practice (Paras. 25 to 28) certainly when it comes to deciding if the UK can ever escape. “ it is extremely difficult to see how a five member arbitral panel made up of lawyers who were independent of the parties would be prepared to make a judgment as political as whether the Protocol is no longer necessary.

10. There is no legal protection for the UK: a solution to this (if it comes) would have to be political. But if we sign May’s deal, we are in a legally binding treaty – the EU now refuses to bend or change rules for us. It has refused every day of the negotiation. There is no basis to conclude the EU will change once we are controlled by them in the backstop.

Such is the swindling shyster who today rules as Britain's Prime Minister. Time for someone to command her, in the name of God, to go.