Thursday, June 27, 2024

Tucker Carlson: Native-Born Americans Are Being Replaced By Immigrants -- Same in Canada But More So


The situation in Canada is similar to that in the US as described by Tucker Carlson -- but worse.  

Except for immigration, Canada's population would be falling.

Without immigration, population maintenance requires a total fertility rate of 2.1. In 2023, Canada's total fertility rate was less than 1.5, 40% below the replacement rate and even lower than the American rate which in the same year was 1.62.

But despite the low fertility rate, Canada's population is growing. How come? Because of a massive influx of immigrants, at a rate that greatly exceeds the birthrate.

In 2023, births in Canada totalled 356,903, but there were 437,000 immigrants. That's 122 thousand immigrants in excess of births. 
 
Under Justin Trudeau, Canada's population policy is thus a policy of native population replacement. 

The deficit in Canadian fertility is intensified by immigrant competion for jobs and housing which lowers wages while raising housing costs.

Without decent incomes and the security of home ownership which good wages allow, many young Canadian couples defer starting a family or simply never make a start. Immigrants, of course, face the same problems. 

Thus Canada's Trudeauvian policy of mass immigration amounts to a program of national self-genocide, the native population being progressively replaced by people from elsewhere. For the most part, good people from elsewhere, no doubt, but they're not native-born Canadians.

What's the solution?

Simple

Cut the immigration rate by something like 90% and keep it at that greatly reduced rate until the Canadian total fertility rate rises from its current rate of less than 1.5 to the replacement rate of 2.1.

Boeing: Once a Company of Engineers

Yes, the COVID Vax May Have Damaged Your Brain

_______________________________________________

QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, May 28, 2024 

A potential association between COVID-19 vaccination and development of alzheimer's disease




Jee Hoon Hong Jin Kim, Min-Ho Kim, Myeong Geun Choi, Eun Mi Chun

Wednesday, June 26, 2024

American Psychologists for Official Truth: 9/11 and the Murder of JFK

American psychologist and Harvard Professor, Steven Pinker, has suggested that those who question the official account of either the destruction of New York's Twin Towers on September 11, 2001, or the 1963 assassination of US President J.F. Kennedy are holders of "weird beliefs," or nutters as others might say. In this, Pinker is not alone in the Psych community. For example,  in his Psych. The Story of the Human Mind, University of Toronto Professor and Yale Emeritus Professor Paul Bloom writes:
If we're smart, why do we often seem so dumb? Take conspiracy theories. There are those who deny the existence of the Holocaust, who believe that the September 11 attacks were an inside job, who think that the COVID pandemic is a fraud.
How remarkable this is. First, note how it conflates a number of quite plausible beliefs with the discreditable denial of the Holocaust and the silly idea that the COVID pandemic never occurred (I know it did. I had Covid -- twice). Second, note how this statement is based on the implicit assumption that any rational person going to the trouble of learning what happened on 9/11 will unquestioningly accept the conclusion of the 9/11 Commission Report, notwithstanding that Thomas Kean, Chair of the 9/11 Commission, wrote a book expressing his personal doubts as to the published conclusions of the Commission that he had headed. 

So for those too young to remember the assassination of President Kennedy, and with better things to do than to research either the Kennedy assassination, or the attacks of 9/11, here are key tests of the validity of the official accounts of those events. 

First, the Kennedy assassination. The official story, as presented in the report of the Commission headed by Earl Warren, Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, was clear and simple: President Kennedy was killed by a head shot fired by Lee Harvey Oswald located at a sixth floor window of the Texas School Book Depository building, which stood directly behind the President's open car as it passed through Dallas's Dealey Plaza. 

The problem with this claim is that it is contrary to the facts.

First, there is the Zapruder film, an amateur video of the President's car at the time of the shooting. The video shows that immediately after the President received a shot to the head, Jacqueline Kennedy, who was seated beside the president in the open car in which they were riding, climbed onto the trunk of the car to retrieve a piece of the President's scull. The implication is clear: the fatal shot to the President's head was from the front, not from behind, which is where Oswald was located. That is true, whatever Oswald may have been doing, including, quite probably, shooting at the President. In fact, it is likely that a bullet from Oswald's gun accounted for Kennedy's neck wound, and also for a bullet wound suffered by Texas Governor Connally, who was riding in the front passenger seat of the car in which the Kennedys were riding. 

That the fatal shot to President Kennedy's head was from the front is confirmed by the testimony of all the doctors who examined Kennedy at the Parklands Hospital where he was taken immediately after the shooting. Here, for example, is  Doctor Robert MacClelland, a Parklands Hospital surgeon describing the President's wounds:


So what you gonna believe. The Official account according to which the fatal shot to the President's head was from behind, or Dr. MacClelland's lyin' eyes?

As for the theory that the Twin Towers were wired for demolition on 9/11, why not? New York Trade Center Building 7, the third building to collapse on 9/11, was certainty wired for controlled demolition. How do we know? Straight from the mouth of Larry Silverstein, the building's owner. 


Thing is, wiring a block-long building for controlled demolition involves placing dozens of explosive charges. That's not something that can be done in minutes, or in an afternoon.  So Building 7 had to have been wired for demolition prior to 9/11. That being so, why not also the Twin Towers?

What is the moral of this tale? One at least is that psychologists, in their professional capacity, should stick to pychology. Their expertise rarely has application in adjudicating the truth of the historical record. 

Monday, June 24, 2024

British Speech Control: Tell the Truth, Be Accused of Treason

 Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has accused a prominent legacy media outlet of printing falsehoods and “collaborating” with the Kremlin to smear him to protect the “dying Conservative Party”.

The Mail on Sunday, the sister paper of the Daily Mail, may be facing a lawsuit from Nigel Farage over its headline over the weekend which read: “Zelensky: Farage Is Infected with ‘Virus of Putin’,” after the Brexit leader stated the West played a role in provoking the Russian invasion with EU and NATO expansionism.

Mr Farage said that the headline was “totally untrue” and said he instructed the Carter-Ruck law firm to “deal with it”.

Source

As a matter of historical fact, Farage's statement about the origins of the Ukraine War is correct. In 2021, a Nazified Ukrainian military force of over 100,000 assembled in Eastern Ukraine for the purpose of destroying Ukraine's self-governing and largely ethnic Russian Donbas republics. This after seven years of Ukrainian shelling and missile attacks on the Donbas that killed over 13,000 men, women and children. 

Nazified Azov Batallion: Yes, they really do identify as Nazis,
as the swastica and the wolfsangel on the banners they display confirm
 Image Source

And yes, the Donbas republics are entitled, under the terms of the UN Charter, to have the governments of their own choosing. Unfortunately for the Ukrainians, they don't get the government of their own chosing, they get to keep Amerika's term-expired, anti-Russian, coke-snorting puppet and Trudeau Friend, Zelenski.  


Meantime: Ukaine uses cluster munitions against Crimea beach-goers

Saturday, June 22, 2024

Who You Gonna Believe About the Ukraine War: Those Losers, Sunak and Starmer or Nigel Farage

 Sir Keir Starmer and Rishi Sunak have condemned Nigel Farage for his claim the West provoked the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Mr Sunak said the Reform UK leader was “completely wrong and only plays into Putin’s hands”.

Labour leader Sir Keir called the remarks “disgraceful” and said anyone standing for Parliament should make clear Russia is the aggressor.

During interview on BBC's Panorama on Friday, Mr Farage was questioned about his opinion of Mr Putin.

He replied: “I said I disliked him as a person, but I admired him as a political operator because he’s managed to take control of running Russia."

Mr Farage, a former member of the European Parliament, also said: “Right, I’ll tell you what you don’t know, I stood up in the European Parliament in 2014 and I said, and I quote, ‘There will be a war in Ukraine’.

“Why did I say that?“It was obvious to me that the ever-eastward expansion of Nato and the European Union was giving this man a reason to his Russian people to say, ‘they’re coming for us again’ and to go to war.”

Speaking to reporters during a campaign visit in London, Sir Keir said: “On the question of Farage, his comments were disgraceful.

“Anyone who is standing for Parliament ought to be really clear that Russia is the aggressor, Putin bears responsibility, and that we stand with Ukraine, as we have done from the beginning of this conflict, and Parliament has spoken with one voice on this since the beginning of the conflict.”

Read more

Boris Johnson Pressured Zelenskyy to Ditch Peace Talks With Russia: Ukrainian Paper

Who'd You Prefer? This Guy, or the Man With No Brain

Wednesday, June 19, 2024

Making Cars Net Zero Now

Many people worry about rising atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations. They should. Elevated atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, which  are normal in office buildings, school rooms, hospital operating rooms, and the White House Oval Office impair cognitive performance. An increase in ambient carbon dioxide concentration can only further impair the mental capacity of the office-bound functionaries who run the world.

Furthermore, increased atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration raises plant productivity. That's great if you're a farmer, but not so great if you worry about population growth, which is mainly occurring in places where population is food limited -- resulting, naturally, in well intentioned efforts to increase food production even more, which tends to result in people still going hungry but in greater numbers. 

Then there's climate change anxiety. Does anyone know for sure what a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide, which we are on course to achieve, will do to the climate and, as a result, to us. Well, there are lots of people to warn of the consequences, but the reality is that we don't know: we're just playing with fire.

What then to do. Easy, just suck it up -- the carbon dioxide, that is. How? Atmospheric carbon dioxide capture and sequestration is already being implemented on a substantial scale. But it costs. So a carbon tax applied in full to direct-air carbon dioxide capture (DAC) provides the solution. 

Current estimates of cost are in the region of US$0.70 per kilogram of carbon dioxide. So just apply a tax of around $1.50 per litre to gasoline and the equivalent to other sources of carbon dioxide and invest the proceeds in massive DAC plants. That will make using a car more expensive -- on average about an additional US$0.30 per kilometer -- but IT'S NOT PROHIBITIVE. And as a plus, folks will drive less, though remaining free to drive as much as they want -- at a price. 

Canada and 40 other national or sub-national jurisdictions already have a carbon price. What remains to be done is to apply the tax revenue to direct air carbon dioxide capture and sequestration.

As for those expensive, overweight electric cars that you can't fast-charge if you're out in the boonies, forget 'em.

Other carbon-emission-free options for the future include vehicles powered by an internal combustion engine burning either ammonia, yielding nitrogen and water vapor, or methanol synthesized by hydrogenation of carbon dioxide captured from the atmosphere.

Huge percentage of EV owners want to go back to normal cars

Barking Mad

Monday, June 17, 2024

The Leader of the "Free World," Has No Brain

By James Howard Kunstler

“Biden is not well. Everyone knows this even those who support him…the difference is they don’t care and that’s the most frightening aspect of this situation.” — Edward Dowd

They’re kidding, right? That “Joe Biden” is capable of being president? Not just for another four-year term, but right here and now? This has got to be the most pitiful case of national gaslighting since 218-AD when the Romans installed 14-year-old Heliogabalus to front for their empire. Like “JB,” he reigned for four years (before the praetorian guard offed him). The Danish historian of ancient Rome, Barthold Niebuhr, said of him: “. . . [He] had nothing at all to make up for his vices, which are of such a kind that it is too disgusting even to allude to them.”

     Lately, even the news media has begun to report “Joe Biden’s” senile mishaps. On Thursday at an outdoor photo op during the G7 meet-up in Italy, the ol’ dawg just wandered off from the assembled pack of world leaders until Italy’s PM Giorgia Meloni went and reeled him back in.

     Do you think that folks are starting to notice?  Even many mind-fucked Democrat Party regulars who have been just fine with the controlled demolition of our country under this human door-stop of a president are murmuring ominously that the scam has become too obvious. Not Rachel Maddow, though. America’s Woke lunatic-in-chief reigning on MSNBC warned this week that the return of Trump would lead to her (and millions of her fans) getting jammed into “concentration camps.”

      Maybe you’ve already noticed that Rachel Maddow lives in a concentration camp of-the-mind located inside her own batshit-crazy skull. Dunno about you, but for the first time in a life lived through many decades of purportedly rational post-war Modernity, I’ve developed a sympathetic view of how come people in earlier eras resorted to burning witches. They are obdurate public nuisances. Their “magic” lately is the ability to provoke a mass formation psychosis, an actual “threat to our democracy” or, more precisely, to our republic. Maddow, the proudly out-front lesbian non-breeder is living proof that renouncing motherhood is a predictor of Cluster-B personality disorder — the condition that defines the “progressive” Wokery of these times.

Read More

Swiss Summit Morons: East Ukraine Oblasts That Voted to Exit Genocidal Ukraine Must be Returned to Ukraine: Expect World War First

Sunday's major Ukraine peace conference in Switzerland, where some 100 countries were represented, has rejected the conditions named by Russia's Vladimir Putin for immediately ending the war.

A final document produced by the summit, which 78 of the countries signed off on, asserted that the basis of any future Ukraine-Russia peace deal to end the war must preserve the "territory integrity" of Ukraine.

Read More