Friday, May 21, 2021

Covid Update: May 23, 2021




UK government is paying the Sun and Daily Mail for positive coverage of its coronavirus response


Nobel Prize winner, Luc Montagnier, says covid vaccination is an “unacceptable mistake” that’s spreading “variants”

“It is clear that the new variants are created by antibody-mediated selection due to the vaccination. ....

Ever since Chinese Virus injections were introduced, the disease and death rate has only continued to skyrocket, the latest data shows. Especially among young people, the death count has “exploded” in every county where the jabs are now being widely administered.

The fake news media is calling each of these cases “breakthrough,” the sentiment being that they are abnormal. The truth, however, is that vaccine-caused variants are the norm, and more people would realize that if only they would take the time to look at the science for themselves."

cf.: 
CanSpeccy: Covid 19 Vaccination: Leading to a Global Viral-Immune-Escape Catastrophe?

Plos One (April 28, 2021): Risk of rapid evolutionary escape from biomedical interventions targeting SARS-CoV-2 spike protein


CDC Caught Manipulating Data to Hide New COVID Cases Among those Who Were Already Vaxxed

Tucker Carlson: Know potential risks of coronavirus vaccines before getting vaccinated

If people get jabbed after watching this they are beyond saving






...all four vaccines in use in Europe contain a fatal design flaw: they cause the fusogenic, pro coagulation spike protein to be expressed wherever the vaccine is taken up. In some people, especially those so young that they’re at no measurable risk of death if infected by the virus, vaccination results in their deaths from thromboembolic events. Permitting the inexpert population to walk into this trap is unconscionable: there will be thousands of further vaccine-induced deaths of young people.

It is my deduction and conclusion that the only motivation that fits all the observations is the intention to ‘herd’ every citizen into a VaxPass system. This is a completely novel system. Never before have all individuals been represented in a single, interoperable database as a unique digital ID, accompanied by an editable health-related field. Whoever controls that database, and the algorithms which govern what it permits and denies, has literally totalitarian control of the entire population.


Jim Jordan: Where did the Covid-19 virus come from:



Leave Our Kids Alone


... notice the deliberately-misleading moniker the media invented for the people who get Covid after being vaccinated. They call them “Breakthrough cases”.

“Breakthrough”? Really?

If cases surge in nearly every country that launches a mass vaccination campaign, then there’s nothing “breakthrough” about it. It’s the predictable result of a failed experiment.
 


10 comments:

  1. It's funny because the virus Covid19 has one of the most astonishingly high transmissivity or infectivity, or whatever it is called, ever. And transmissivity is a gain-of-function parameter.

    Wuhan struck gold on that one-- they done did it on the transmissivity parameter.

    And the human race very likely done lucked out-- though I call it the providence of the divine-- the virus Covid19 isn't particularly lethal in the worldwide population, at large. (Most people who die were going to die anyway-- not that anyone, including Fauci and Gates, particularly wanted to dictate those people who die to die at this specific time, in 2020 and 2021.)

    This, if properly understood, and I pray it be so, be a call to global humanity, as such we be, to realize we are a global humanity, and science-- and government, and even Bill Gates-- are part of us, and at service to us, or they are nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Another funny thing about the "breakthrough" "cases" of Covid19 is this funny little thing about the uselessness of the PCR test for Covid19. I mean, the same test, with the same ridiculously high percentage of false positives, used to track the pandemic is still being used in the post-vaccination era, and the same misuse of the word "case" is still happening...So there's nothing surprising about "breakthrough" "cases"...Nothing strange or surprising, in the slightest.

    It doesn't help the "vaccine" is known not to prevent Covid19, or much of anything else, but ultimately my conclusion is we've been flying blind and that hasn't changed. We're still flying blind.

    Our captain on this flight, the noble and courageous and brilliantly intelligent beyond intelligent Bill Gates, is flying blind, too. I see his fingerprints all over this mess. I think what that means is we have a kamikaze piloting flight planet earth, a blind one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The idea that someone who manages to accumulate a large amount of money must be highly intelligent seems questionable to me.

      Success in business is in large part a matter of luck and, as I mentioned in a comment elsewhere, Gates wad dead lucky in many ways: in the timing of his birth in relation to the microcomputer revolution, parental influence, parental financial backing.

      True he has proved to be a calculating SOB who managed to create a monopoly, but that again was chiefly luck. The business he was in provided a massive first-mover advantage.

      And it is no doubt true also that Gates showed mental energy in deploying the few mundane tricks of swindling that Mencken referred to in his account of business success, but that surely requires nothing much above an average IQ and the capacity for the relentless pursuit of self-interest.

      And now Gates is revealed in his personal life to be, not a saint, as he would wish the world to believe, but a contemptible sleazeball. That the discrepancy has been so blatantly exposed, suggests that Gates is entirely lacking in exceptional intelligence.

      So, yes, relying on Gates for our salvation seems like a catastrophic blunder: especially when there are people with professional expertise in epidemiology who have long and consistently argued for different measures.

      Delete
    2. And you make a good point about the meaninglessness of breakthrough cases. You cannot get valid data with an invalid method.

      But clearly the authorities don't want valid data. They want fake data that drives their agenda, which is to vaccinate everyone, often, and use the vaccine passport as a means to impose Chinese style social credit tyranny.

      If that were not the case, they would have screened the population for covid antibodies. That would have eliminated the need to vaccinate a large part of the population which has had covid in a mild or asymptomatic for.

      They would also have made a serious effort to develop a test for corona virus T-cell immunity -- to be found in up to half the population -- which also eliminates the need for Covid vaccination.

      Delete
  3. I heard Joe Biden wants 70% of the US population vaccinated by July 4th.

    Assuming he'll get that, imagine the havoc if the vaccine is as flawed as in the worst case scenario.

    There will be survivors, but there's always the question whether the survivors will survive the vastly different conditions they'll face in a world where 70% have either died or been seriously impaired.

    See, Bill Gates is nothing but a money-making machine. He reminds me in certain ways of J.D. Rockefeller. (Referred to as "wreck-a-feller" by those other oil field operators destroyed by J.D.'s own ruthless monopoly-making practices.) Gates does nothing and is nothing but this money-making machine.

    He sees the world and its inhabitants as nothing but money-making substrate. In a way, he is beyond good and evil. There's clearly some as yet unquantifiable risk associated with the vaccine, but there's also a clearly indentifiable reward-- for Bill Gates personally.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "The idea that someone who manages to accumulate a large amount of money must be highly intelligent seems questionable to me."

    I see it as nearly entirely false.

    I've known lots of highly intelligent people, and they've tended to make a decent living, but what I notice more is they tend to live what I would call a "cool" life.

    I've known a few rich people, and while not stupid, they tend not to be much interested in the arts, what's happened or happening in the world, or intellectual pursuits. (Not that intellectual pursuits necessarily require great intelligence.)

    They wanted money, had luck, and got money.

    But their lives are not what I call "cool". It is not that much fun having a house bigger than everyone else's, especially if the house is a gaudy McMansion or other form of monstrosity. It isn't that fun to have a bunch of these McMansions spread out over the world, nor is it that great to have a bunch of luxury apartments in metropolitan areas here and there. It is not that much fun to have a fleet of luxury cars which mainly sit in the garage. It isn't that cool to have a grand piano no one genuinely enjoys playing, or an arm-candy wife who can only tolerate her life with you by imbibing booze or an assortment of chemicals.

    In Bill Gates's case, he has a huge number of people who depend on him for their paycheck. He also has bought the favor of huge numbers of organizations and institutions. He's bought the World Health Organization. I notice time and time again, none of these people are going to criticize him in the slightest way. I also notice lots of other people who appear to have a keen desire they become dependent on him for their pay, or who devoutly wish to be bought by him. They kiss his ass.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I've recently purchased a Lenovo ThinkPad. Bundled with it was the latest edition of Microsoft Office.

    I haven't had a new computer since 2009 because the old computer did what I wanted and I knew how to do everything on it I needed to do.

    Now I know how to do some of the things I need to do, but not all. There's quite a bit I need to relearn. It takes time away from what I need to do.

    In some cases, I find the new ways less efficient. They're new, but they aren't necessarily improvements.

    To whose advantage is this, anyway? Mine? I don't think so.

    Microsoft has made money for decades now by offering, and in some cases requiring, new software which isn't much improved from the old software, if at all.

    What I conclude is this razzamatazz is to the benefit of Microsoft more than anyone else. I acknowledge over time there are remarkable improvements overall. I still question the "new model" approach in software marketing. I question it in automobiles, too, but I question it more in software.

    You had the problem with needing to be logged into your Google account to make a post. I am getting a lot of similar problems with this new computer. It is fascinating the kind of jockeying going on behind the scenes.

    I'm going off on this, but it interests me greatly.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I got fed up trying to work on a complex manuscript with MS Word, so I cut and pasted to Google docs and within about five minutes I was more at home and in greater control.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think, as per your link above, they are going to jimmy the numbers so the vaccine appears both more safe and more effective than it actually is.

    I also see strong indications their efforts to explain the failure to end the pandemic will be two pronged, blaming:

    (1) Unvaccinated children;
    (2) Vaccine "hesitancy".

    They are going to vaccinate children regardless of what vaccinating children does to the health of children. From their point of view, they must do this.

    It looks as if the government understands people are fed up with being masked and practicing social distancing, so there is a strong motivation now to lessen the restrictions-- for those vaccinated.

    It is so terrible sitting on the sidelines and watching all this transpire.

    I have started to discover some inner reserve allowing me to get over my despair.

    ReplyDelete