Thursday, October 26, 2017

Did Thereason May's Tory Government Try to Swing the US Election for the Sake of the New World Order?

George H. W. Bush announced the birth a "New World Order" following the 1991 fall of the Soviety Union, but the plan for an Anglo dominated New World order goes back to a time 100 years earlier, when the British empire builder, gold- and diamond-miner and one-time South African premier, Cecil Rhodes, conspired with Lord Rothschild to create a secret society that would use Rhodes' great wealth to promote global governance in accordance with the British legal and cultural tradition, while securing global domination for London-based capital.

By the end of World War 1, however, it was clear that Britain was in no position to pursue Rhodes' globalist project single-handedly, so it was handed off to the Americans through the creation of the New-York-based Council on Foreign Relations, the world's most influential think tank, to which most 20th Century American presidents have belonged, John F. Kennedy being a notable exception.

But while playing second fiddle to the United States, Britain by no means abandoned its commitment to globalization and indeed the British Government under various Tory administrations has done whatever was necessary to promote the globalist interests of the City of London, which remains as it was at the turn of the 19th Century, the world's largest financial center.

Consistent with this globalist commitment, the British Government under both Tory and pseudo-Labour (aka New Labor) governments has been a staunch ally of the US in the drive for world empire, both as a participant in American wars for global domination in the Balkans, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, etc., etc., and in the drive to destroy the European peoples, whose sovereign, democratic nation states are the greatest barrier to the globalist project. In particular, British Governments have led the World in the genocide of their own people by a combination of suppressed fertility combined with mass replacement immigration to create a pro-globalist home electorate.

The current childless British Prime Minister, Theresa May, has amply demonstrated her loyalty to the treasonous globalist policy by continuing, abroad, British support for every US imperialistic aggression,  and at home, the genocidal policy of national self-hatred, compulsory K–post-graduate sex "education" to inculcate the belief that the only sexual vice is reproduction, and virtually uncontrolled replacement immigration.

It would not be surprising, therefore, to learn that the British state may have engaged in criminal acts, aimed at preventing "build-a-wall," "America-First" Donald Trump from winning the US presidency. And indeed such has been alleged concerning the so-called Trump dossier prepared by the MI6-connected British spy, Christopher Steele. An outline of the postulated conspiracy between a British agent and the Clinton campaign is presented here.

Related: 

State of the Nation: It wasn’t Russia that tried to fix the 2016 U.S. presidential election; it was the British

RT: Migration main cause of ‘frightening’ growth in UK population, official figures reveal
This headline is quite misleading. The population of the indigenous population of the UK is not growing at all, it is aging and declining, with a fertility rate far below replacement. All of the increase in UK population is due to migration.

Without migration the UK would have a much smaller and a rapidly declining population. Under those circumstances, housing would be dirt cheap, wages would be high and taxes would be much lower since there would be no need for additional maternity hospitals, schools, universities, etc. to accommodate the immigrant population that is expected to outnumber the British people within a generation.

Without immigration, the conditions of life in Britain would have greatly improved, with a resulting increase in birth rate and stabilization or growth in the population of the indigenous British people, the occupants of the Isles for many thousands of years.

No comments:

Post a Comment