Prince Harry, the Direct Descendant of George the Third, In His Open Declaration of Contempt for the First Amendment, Backs the Woke Revolution to Intimidate the People and Recognize the Money Power as the Permanent Government of Amerika

Proving that royalty can be stupid beyond belief and highly toxic, Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, is reported to have offered the following botched attempt at intelligent speech in something called a podcast:

"I don't want to start sort of going down the First Amendment route because that's a huge subject and one in which I don't understand because I've only been here a short period of time," Harry said. "But, you can find a loophole in anything. And you can capitalize or exploit what’s not said rather than uphold what is said." He said. "I’ve got so much I want to say about the First Amendment as I sort of understand it, but it is bonkers," he continued.

 

So now you know.

If you are an anti-masker, Harry does not want to hear from you.

If you have a religious scruple against the taking of human life in the womb, Harry does not want to hear from you.

Harry is a counter-revolutionary who dreams, apparently, of becoming the ruler, nominal or otherwise, of an anti-democratic, Amerikan Empire.

He is, it would appear, a poorly educated and confused puppet of America's plutocracy that has become impatient with the democratic charade and wishes to govern directly and without the uncertainties and embarrassments of rule by bribery and blackmail of what are nominally the elected representatives of the people.

Related: 

Johnathan Turley: The "Bonkers" Interview Of Bonny Prince Harry: Why The Attack On The First Amendment Should Concern All Americans

“Free Speech Is A Digital Black Plague”: Bishop Garrison is Key Mercenary in Biden’s Dark War Against The First Amendment

Harry and Meghan, the Super-Sensitive Royals

Harry and Meghan claim to have been driven from Harry's native Britain by British racism, the Daily Mail reporting that:

... In November 2016, Harry lashed out at the 'wave of abuse and harassment' the US actress had faced from the media – citing the 'racial undertones of comment pieces' among his concerns.

Oh dear, what a sad state of affairs we have reached when even members of the Royal Family claim victim status.

The mail further reports that:

...The couple are said to see their long-term future in the US – but not, while President Donald Trump is President with friends claiming while the couple plan to live in Canada at first their ultimate aim is to have a home and business in Los Angeles.

So Canada is not exactly where they want to be, just a kind of holding zone until the US of A has a president they find more acceptable than the one elected by the American people.

Meantime, the Mail reports, poor Liz II is under the gun:

... to find a way forward because the Sussexes could give a tell-all interview to their friend Oprah Winfrey... if they do not get their way...

Which sounds like, you know, blackmail. 

And just to give the threat greater credibility, Harry's close friend, broadcaster Tom Bradby, warned that in an interview with Oprah Winfrey they could:

... 'sound off' about the royal family's 'racism and sexism'

And blackmail with a big prize at stake:

... The Duke of Sussex wants his 93-year-old grandmother, father and brother to let him and his wife keep their royal titles while living abroad and grabbing 'financial independence' to earn their own money using the Sussex brand, which experts say could be worth £400million.

And there you have it. All that lubbly jubbly to be grabbed selling the SussexRoyal insignia while telling those stuffy Royal Brits to go stuff themselves. 

Unfortunately, for the SussexRoyal pair, they may find Canadian "racism" as appalling as British Racism, if comments in the Vancouver Sun are anything to go by. Thus one Jannick Slavik writes:

... So Trudeau has approved an initial 1,000,000 RCMP security expense for these leaches? What a joke And airhead Megan says she wants to stay in Canada until After Trump is gone? It’s going to be another 5 years of expense for these losers

And that comment raises another question. In their declared intention to live outside the United States as long as Donald Trump remains President, Harry and wife are taking a political stance that is  clearly incompatible with the political impartiality of Britain's constitutional monarchy.

The implication is clear: Prince Harry should give up his Royal title. Then, he and Mrs Harry Mountbatten Windsor* can live wherever they want for whatever reason they want, whether their reasons, however political, are privately held or publicly declared.

This necessary transition from public figures to private individuals will free Harry and Meg to get as rich as croesus without causing Britain's constitutional monarchy any taint of either  commercialization or politicization.

_____
* The original family name was Battenberg, which might suit Harry, reduced to the status of a regular Canadian, better than Mountbatten Windsor, the cumbersome made-up name that he currently goes by.

Related:
Daily Mail: Harry regrets

Daily Mail: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle STILL call themselves 'Their Royal Highnesses' in statement released on SussexRoyal.com website minutes after the Palace announces they are quitting royal life , dropping HRH titles and won't receive any more taxpayers' cash

Globe and Mail: 
Harry and Meghan, and why members of the Royal Family can’t live in Canada

Globe and Mail:
The Canadian Crown meets residual royalty: The awkward truth about Harry and Meghan in Canada

Globe and Mail:‘Meghan and Harry: If you are reading these comments, please take them to heart and stay in Britain!’ Readers debate: Can the royal couple live in Canada?

Angus Reid Institute: 
Royal Tab: Vast majority of Canadians don’t want to pay costs associated with the Sussexes’ move to Canada

Globe and Mail: 
The Canadian Crown meets residual royalty: The awkward truth about Harry and Meghan in Canada

Globe and Mail:
Meghan and Harry move to Canada: The plan so far, and the questions it raises

Globe and Mail:
Meghan Markle’s father to testify in legal row with tabloid

CanSpeccy:
The Crackbrained Sussexes: Dictating Terms to the Queen

The Crackbrained Sussexes: Dictating Terms to the Queen

Here's the website of Prince Harry and Meghan. Future arrangements between themselves and the British Head of State, Queen Elizabeth II, is a matter, they seem to believe, that they can dictate to her Majesty the Queen without discussion or negotiation. Thus, after explaining their rights as they see them, and their entitlement to funding from the British state, they proclaim their fealty to Her Majesty the Queen thus :

... The Duke and Duchess proudly carry out official overseas visits in support of Her Majesty The Queen

Very good of them, I'm sure.

But do they not understand that the Queen is not some old lady in need of "support," but is, rather, the embodiment, and head, of the British State and, therefore, as British subjects, it is not for Harry and Meghan to graciously extend their support to the Queen, but rather for them to support Her Majesty the Queen to any degree and in any way that Her Majesty may request or require.

Sadly, therefore, the presumption of the Sussexes in attempting to dictate their relationship with the Monarchy is completely nutty and potentially very dangerous to their own future well-being.

The British State will not be dictated to by anyone, and certainly not by crackpots, even crackpot members of the Royal family.

Sadly, Harry seems to be following in the footsteps of his mother, Princess Diana, who in her own crazy way did her best to destroy the British Monarchy and ended up dead.

Related: 
The Daily Mail Reports:

The couple secretly registered their new Sussex Royal website as early as last March without telling the Royal Family;

Harry ignored a personal request by the Queen to keep negotiations about his wish to break free private and not make a public statement;

The couple also chose to disregard pleas from their closest aides on Monday night that they should hold off from releasing a statement out of respect for his grandmother;

Sources said Harry had even suggested his mental health would be at risk if he didn't facilitate a change in his position;

The Royal Family are not planning to strip Harry and Meghan of their titles as courtiers fear it would look vengeful and reminiscent of the treatment meted out to Harry's mother, Princess Diana;

Scotland Yard will carry out a full review of the couple's security as the costs of their taxpayer-funded police protection looked set to spiral into the millions.