Tuesday, September 8, 2020

Covid19: Some Random Links

University of Waterloo professor calls pandemic 'COVID fake emergency

Yikes: New York Times Estimates 90% of ‘Positive’ COVID Test Results Really Are Negative!


Coronavirus: Oxford University vaccine trial paused after participant falls ill

But fortunately:

And if you take 1000 units of Vitamin D every day before you get Covid19 then you may not even have to go to hospital.

And: 

Furthermore:

And to end on a cheerful note:
Flu is killing more people than Covid19, and has been for months

15 comments:

  1. The article about the Gates-backed Covid vaccine producing adverse reactions is from May 20th. This is the first time I'd heard anything about this.

    The article is written by Robert Kennedy. I have begun to have considerable respect for him due to his work on issues of vaccine safety. I find him very credible.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Robert F. Kennedy III, has the courage of the Kennedy's and their rashness too. He has openly attributed the murder of his grandfather to the CIA.

      Delete
    2. Kennedy said at the end of the article he was going to send the information to some securities lawyers for review-- there's only so much lip stick a publicly-traded corporation can legally put on a donkey. Moderna was certainly stretching in the way they brightened their disturbing test results. Enough time has lapsed I would imagine the lawyers have returned their opinion on the matter. I may contact Kennedy to see what's happened.

      Delete
  2. On the note of random, have you seen the Wells Fargo Bank ads showing they've converted many of their branches into drive-in food banks?

    I don't know if you have them in Canada, but in the US, you can do your banking from your car. A pneumatic tube system allows you to do your transaction without being in direct contact with the teller.

    Now, you can get your food bank meal in a special bag in the same drive through. How wonderful!

    Wells Fargo is doing its best to get us through these terrible times. ("Unthinkable" times is the way Wells Fargo describes it.)

    BTW: I liked the cartoon. Why did you take it down?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The late Malcolm Muggeridge once sadly remarked that the trouble with being a humorist is that real life is so much funnier than anything you could invent.

      That Warren Buffet's favorite bank, having impoverished its clients through reckless lending, is now keeping them alive -- and hence able to go on making the interest payments -- by providing a bag of beans (Taxpayer funded) at the press of button provides an grim example of life exceeding in absurdity anything one might imagine.

      I removed the cartoon in a more or less mindless attempt to tidy up the page. Now I cannot find it to put it back. But there are some articles here that deal with the motivation behind the officially sanctioned covid panic:

      COVID 19 – Scamdemic – Part 1, and Part 2.

      Delete
  3. The Wells Fargo commercial:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZYaumiG_-8

    Wells Fargo tells us we can "make a difference" by becoming volunteers to Wells-Fargo (we'll get a nifty T-shirt out of the deal, too) and help them to distribute food "to those in need." Imagine volunteering to a bank! Bank and food bank wonderfully merged as is humanitarianism and the most ruthless financial exploitation in world history.

    On a related note, this Wells Fargo ad is the first time I have seen in the venue of mass media any indication or recognition there are Americans going hungry.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't want the goddam T-shirt, I want the bag of beans.

      This is Communism with American characteristics. For-profit food-ration distribution by beneficent corporations. Thank the Lord for Wells Fargo.

      Delete
  4. Somehow this is on my mind. You talked about how Unz.com might be a set up to get a reading on out-of-the-mainstream opinions and identify some of the individuals who have these views. Somehow this caused me to remember Gloria Steinem's work for the CIA in Europe, I believe in the early 60's. She organized conferences, ostensibly leftist and socialist, in order to attract left-leaning students to attend. By attending the conferences, their identity became known to the CIA and they could then be more easily monitored. My source for this information is Gloria Steinem herself. She has never criticized herself for her CIA involvement, and has gone so far as to claim these efforts were some of the best work the CIA has ever done.

    Not that anyone ever notices how peculiar it is for Gloria Steinem to emerge seemingly from out of nowhere to become the most famous feminist in the entire world, and the most influential.

    She came to the University of Alaska a few years ago to give a short lecture on feminism. The state of Alaska paid her $35K speaking fee, as well as all expenses. The auditorium was standing room only, and the looks of fawning adoration on the faces of academia's wonderful critical thinkers was a sight to behold. To them, she's a superstar. (It was amazing to me to see this 80 y.o. woman dressed in black turtleneck, shimmering black slacks, a silver concho belt, looking that sexy.) Malcolm Muggeridge was right-- you can't make funnier things up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's interesting. I never took any notice of Steinem -- feminism has never seemed to me to enhance female attractiveness.

      And presumably many others were used in the same way: visiting Latin America, for example, chatting up the local lefties and Commies then marking them by way of the CIA for elimination by the local junta.

      Now, of course, Google does the job in an immensely more comprehensive way, throttling blogger sites as appropriate, while indentifying potential trouble-makers merely by their use of google search terms.

      Delete
    2. As for Ron Unz, he's an enigma to me. To judge by the rather limited number of names that come up in the comments sections at the Unz Review, I assume that the impact of his mag is quite small. In the age of blogger, FB, Twitter etc., I cannot see such an operation being of much use to the intelligence services as a means of outing potential trouble-makers. Perhaps he's just a rich crank with definite opinions but without anything sensible to say.

      Delete
  5. You're right-- Unz is drawing far fewer comments nowadays. Back at around the start of the pandemic some of the articles there received thousands. Unz himself may be getting throttled. If so, that does kinda mean he's not being used, or at least not being used the way he was before. I don't know, either.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unz is either a nut or a propagandist: I think the latter, in particular, a propagandist for Covid terror and the Communist Party of China.

      I just made a reasonable comment on Unz's latest post with a link back to my own latest post which presents data showing that the death toll from flu in the UK is now running far ahead of that from Covid 19 which as subsided to near zero. The implication seems clear: Unz is not an honest man.

      According to UK Government data, Covid 19 was mentioned with reference to 101 deaths in the most recent weekly interval (Week 35) or about 0.8% of average weekly deaths. Influenza and pneumonia, on the other hand were mentioned in the case of 12.5% of deaths in week 35. Apparently, Unz cannot allow this information to be known.

      Delete
    2. But here's my latest post at Unz.com. It will be interesting to see if it passes the censor.

      So Ron, you deleted my comment which stated that Covid 19 is not like the seasonal flu, but rather less deadly.

      Maybe you think I am simply wrong in that assertion, but the British Government data I referred to indicate that in the most recent recording period, Week 35, Covid 19 was mentioned in relation to 101 deaths out of 9,032, whereas 12.6% of all deaths mentioned "Influenza and Pneumonia."

      Now are you an honest man merely confused, or are you just another propagandist dishing the Covid terror?

      Delete
    3. Yeah, Unz trashed it. Now we know: he's not an honest man.

      Delete
    4. He can't go man to man. Not even once have I seen him really get into it with anybody. I am pretty sure he is aware of you. But he isn't going to say "look, that's your point, and I see why you think that, but consider this..." And then you could say your say and we might have a bit of learning and figuring this thing out. He wants to lurk in the background and, equipped with an IQ of 214, game the thing. I'm glad you're still talking about him. I find this guy fascinating. He's the typical idiot savant. He has wonderful talents and blind spots miles wide.

      Delete