The Daily Express, May 2, 2013: BRITAIN will be the Western world’s most ethnically diverse nation after 2050, according to an explosive academic study.
Prof Coleman said migration has become the “primary driver of demographic change”
It lays bare the effect of decades of immigration and claims that white Britons will be in a minority by 2066.
A mass influx of migrants has given the UK the fastest-rising percentage of ethnic minority and foreign-born populations.
The report – which also reveals the huge impact of Labour’s open-door policy to immigration between 1997 and 2010 – says foreigners and non-white Britons living here will double by 2040 and make up one third of the UK population.
Report author Professor
David Coleman said: “On current trends European populations will become
more ethnically diverse, with the possibility that today’s majority
ethnic groups will no longer comprise a numerical majority.”
The findings mean that the UK could overtake the United States as the world’s melting pot, with fewer people describing themselves as British or white.
The projection comes after David Cameron sought to reassure voters that the influx of migrants from Bulgaria and Romania will be “nothing like” the levels seen when Poland joined the European Union.
The professor of demography at Oxford made his findings from a study of international population projections, carried out for the academic organisation Migration Observatory.
In the study, minorities are classed as people who also describe themselves in censuses as Irish or another nationality, as well as by their skin colour.
Prof Coleman said migration has become the “primary driver of demographic change”.
According to the data, around a fifth of people in the UK are non-white or non-British. But this is expected to rise to a quarter by 2025, a third by 2040 and reach up to 38 per cent by 2050.
The increase from 2010 to 2050 in the UK – by 22 percentage points – is the highest of the main western countries analysed.
Over the same period, the proportion of non-whites and migrants in Denmark will rise from 10 per cent to 14 per cent.
Declining birth rates among white Britons is another factor.
In England and Wales, 25 per cent of births are to foreign-born mothers, the report said. A similar trend is seen in France and Germany.
We now need concrete proposals to reduce immigration. No less important is the task of integrating such huge numbers into society
The calculations are based on the current net rates of immigration, which have been running at more than 200,000 a year.
Prof Coleman pointed to a study which suggests “the crossover for the whole country when the combined population of all ethnic minority groups together would exceed the population of white British will occur at around 2066.
However, he says the Coalition’s plans to limit net migration could have an enduring effect on the impact on the make-up of the British population. Immigration campaigners yesterday raised concerns about newcomers’ ability to integrate into society, and their impact on the health and education systems.
The UK’s population is estimated to hit 77 million by 2051.
Andrew Green, from campaign group MigrationWatch, praised the importance of the study.
He said: “It brings out the consequences if the mass immigration triggered by Labour is not rapidly brought under control.
“Nearly four million immigrants have arrived since 1997 and the impact is felt in maternity units, housing and primary schools.
“We now need concrete proposals to reduce immigration. No less important is the task of integrating such huge numbers into society.”
The Government has promised to control the impact of new arrivals from Romania and Bulgaria next year.
Mr Cameron said the huge number coming from Poland since it joined the EU in 2004 – put at 1.1 million – was due to Britain putting no controls on immigration. He said: “When a country joins the European Union you can put in place transitional controls. You can say to that country, ‘You can’t all come here for the first seven years’.
“The last government, when Poland and a lot of other countries joined, didn’t put those controls in place.
“Because other European countries did, we did have an enormous influx of people from Poland and those other countries. This time, because the transitional controls have been put in, we are not lifting the restrictions on Romania and Bulgaria alone, it’s happening across Europe.
“So I don’t think we’ll have anything like the situation we had in the Polish situation."
See also:
Robert Henderson: Bruges Group meeting 23rd April 2013 – Immigration: Can we control it?
Paul Weston: Genocide of the English
Watching the Liberal Left Over at the Guardian Smearing the Messenger
"Declining birth rates among white Britons is another factor."
ReplyDeleteThe whole point, I think.
The Warsaw Pact nations from the 50s to the 80s had crappy birthrates because the regime was lousy and there were few opportunities for kids, once born. The Soviet regime created a zero-sum game in lands once fecund with opportunity.
Under mass migration, the same rules must apply. Every boatload of migrants is another reason for native born mothers to abort. Global capitalism creates zero-sum games in lands once fecund with opportunity.
Americans are not happy to see the "melting pot" hooey going elsewhere, it caused us enough trouble just destroying Detroit. The term itself, "melting pot", was coined by a Zionist Jew who had no intention in living in a multi-ANYTHING.
Legalization of abortion was a key step in the destruction of the British race. It destroys about 190,000 unborn children a year. Roughly equal to the net immigration number. The Muslim immigrants, however, don't tolerate abortion, so mass abortion means population replacement.
DeleteAnd, in addition, schools teach oral sex and every other kind of non-reproductive perversion, which, since it is contrary to Muslim teaching, further diminishes the relative reproductive success of the indigenous people, who have been indoctrinated from birth to despise Christianity, the culture of what is now the defunct Western civilization.
Meantime the Guardian, the New Statesman, Cameron, Blair, Miliband and Clegg smear opponents of immigration as bigots and closet racists.
Amazing how easily a once great nation can be destroyed by the effective placement of a few puppets of the globalist entity.
We live in a world past peak resources. England can only support about 12 million people on a long term sustainable basis.
ReplyDeleteWhat is the response of the elite? Cull the plebs.
How to do it? All multicultural countries end in civil war, so lets have a multicultural country. The third world plebs and the English plebs can wipe each other out. All useless eaters anyway. Plus no blood on the hands of the elite. Just their own fault due to typical pleb behaviour. End result is enough resources left for the elite. Success.
The inevitable civil war isn't the problem, its the whole point of the game. Final solution of elite to the problem of surplus plebs.
Gavinthornbury
Re: "England can only support about 12 million people on a long term sustainable basis."
DeleteAs I have pointed out in a discussion with you before, England's carrying capacity is far greater than it was in times past due to advances in agricultural and energy technology. Britain is, in fact, a net exporter of grains, and could be entirely self-sufficient in energy even with a population rising to 70 million.
But the value of a pair of hands isn't what it was, and the elite see no point in maintaining a consumer society comprised of plebs taking in each others' washing machines. The masses take up space and damage the environment, which the elite would like to return to a more pastoral state for their own enjoyment.
The goal is not, however, merely to reduce the population, but also to destroy the nation state, which is the only thing that stands in the way of global control by the money power.
Once England is reduced to a seething mass of mutually loathing cultural and racial groups, no one, least of all the Government, will speak for England, or assert the nation's sovereignty. The Camerons and Blairs, the PR flacks for the money power, will then be free to do exactly as they are told, without giving the least consideration to the interests of the people. Actually, that's about the way they govern now.
Something jumped out at me from your comment, CS:
ReplyDelete"Once England is reduced to a seething mass of mutually loathing cultural and racial groups..."
Change to --
"Once the Americas are reduced to seething masses of mutually loathing cultural and racial groups..."
-- They'll be just as they were when Columbus got here.
Within a few generations, even the infrastructure could be gone. Former industrial states in the US are giving whole cities back to the squirrels.
Spooky.
Multi-culturalism is always self limiting because it will inevitably be defended by an army made up of "a seething mass of mutually loathing cultural and racial groups"; which is easily defeated by any tightly knit homogenous enemy, even if that enemy is much smaller.
ReplyDeleteSee the late Roman Empire fighting the Huns. Or over 140,000 western troops in Afghanistan,superbly armed with total air superiority; fighting a mere 5,000 Pushtun nationalist Taliban in flip-flops with AK47s. Outcome has been a crushing defeat for the western troops.
Especially see the USA army, which was integrated in 1948 and has has never won a war since. Not in Korea, Vietnam, Somalia, Iraq or Afghanistan. No matter how small or weak the enemy, the USA army has always been a failure.
An example for a probable future "diverse" UK army. Easy prey for determined future insurgents of any persuasion.
Gavinthornbury
And, to make things more interesting, they've now lifted the ban on women in combat!
Delete