Sunday, December 11, 2016

UK Ambassador Trashes Claim Russia Hacked US Election

Hillary Clinton, in October, was the first to accuse Russia of meddling in the US Presidential election in order to prevent her winning, and to impose Donald Trump on the American people.

Now US "intelligence officials" are informing trusty mainstream media (i.e., globalist propaganda) outlets such as mostly-billionaire-Thomson-owned Reuters that:
U.S. intelligence agencies have assessed that as the 2016 presidential campaign progressed, Russian government officials devoted increasing attention to assisting Trump's effort to win the election.
Specifically, Reuters claims, based on statements from unnamed "U.S. officials briefed on the matter," and as reported in the Washington [Com]Post, on Friday that:
intelligence agencies had identified individuals with connections to the Russian government who provided thousands of hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee and others, including the chairman of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, to WikiLeaks.
In a pithy response, a representative of Donald Trump noted that:
These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction...
More directly, the story was repudiated by friend of Julian Assange, former UK Ambassador, Craig Murray, in a blog post of October 19, 2016, in which he states:
WikiLeaks never reveals or comments upon its sources, but as I published before a fortnight ago, I can tell you with 100% certainty that it is not any Russian state actor or proxy that gave the Democratic National Committee and Podesta material to WikiLeaks. The claim is nonsense.
Today, December 11, 2016, Murray returned to the topic of Russia's alleged intervention in the US Presidential election, stating:
I have watched incredulous as the CIA’s blatant lie has grown and grown as a media story – blatant because the CIA has made no attempt whatsoever to substantiate it. There is no Russian involvement in the leaks of emails showing Clinton’s corruption. Yes this rubbish has been the lead today in the Washington Post in the US and the Guardian here, and was the lead item on the BBC main news. I suspect it is leading the American broadcasts also.

A little simple logic demolishes the CIA’s claims. The CIA claim they “know the individuals” involved. Yet under Obama the USA has been absolutely ruthless in its persecution of whistleblowers, and its pursuit of foreign hackers through extradition. We are supposed to believe that in the most vital instance imaginable, an attempt by a foreign power to destabilise a US election, even though the CIA knows who the individuals are, nobody is going to be arrested or extradited, or (if in Russia) made subject to yet more banking and other restrictions against Russian individuals? Plainly it stinks. The anonymous source claims of “We know who it was, it was the Russians” are beneath contempt.
and with reference to Britain's Globalist Shill of Record, The Guardian, he refers to a "ludicrous" article:
repeating the mad CIA allegations against Russia and now claiming – incredibly – that the CIA believe the FBI is deliberately blocking the information on Russian collusion. Presumably this totally nutty theory, that Putin is somehow now controlling the FBI, is meant to answer my obvious objection that, if the CIA know who it is, why haven’t they arrested somebody. That bit of course would be the job of the FBI, who those desperate to annul the election now wish us to believe are the KGB.
With reference to the latter blog post, Murray has another post of the same date in which he writes:
So far 564 people believe they have shared on Facebook my article conclusively refuting the CIA’s invention of lies about Russia hacking the DNC, using the share button on this site. Another 78 have tried to share it from my Facebook page. Between them those 650 people will have. according to the Facebook average, about 200,000 friends. The total amount of incoming traffic from these 200,000 friends? 22 people. Almost nobody can currently reach this site through Facebook, as the “came from” interface on my statcounter below shows. Nothing from Facebook. Facebook are actively colluding in preventing social media from contradicting the mainstream media lies about Russian involvement in the US election campaign.
Hence, the title of this post.

Amusingly, while Hillary bleats pitifully about hateful fake news that has ruined her life by denying her her rightful, deserved, place as President of the United States, she is accusing the Russians of ruining her life not with fake news but by revealing the truth about the way in which the Democratic National Committee conspired, on her behalf, to deny Bernie Sanders the Democratic Party nomination for President.


Intellihub: Why liberals can’t handle the truth about Russia hacking the election

Craig Murray: The Russian Bear Uses a Keyboard

Daily Mail: EXCLUSIVE: Ex-British ambassador who is now a WikiLeaks operative claims Russia did NOT provide Clinton emails - they were handed over to him at a D.C. park by an intermediary for 'disgusted' Democratic whistleblowers

Zero Hedge: FBI Disputes CIA's "Fuzzy And Ambiguous" Claims That Russia Sought To Influence Presidential Election

Zero Hedge: Saudi Arabia Has Funded 20% Of Hillary's Presidential Campaign, Saudi Crown Prince Claims

Joint DHS and ODNI Election Security Statement (October 7. 2016):
The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. ...

HuffPo: Who Cares If Russia Leaks Clinton’s Emails? 5 DNC Officials Resigned For Cheating Bernie Sanders
Voters should focus upon the corruption exposed by these leaks, not the country or people suspected of uncovering such data.
Washington's Blog: Former US Ambassador to the UN, Head of NSA’s Global Surveillance Program and British Ambassador Say DNC Hacks May Have Been By AMERICAN Insider

NaturalNews: Washington Post goes “full treason” – fabricates entire story falsely claiming Trump won because of Russian hacks

IWB: DNC hack blamed on Russia may have been Obama’s false flag operation – former US ambassador Bolton
IWB: Trump Names CNN And CIA Perpetrators Of ‘Fake News’

IWB: Americans Are Witnessing An Attempted CLINTON/CIA Coup Against DONALD TRUMP

IWB: PropOrNot Website Exposed As CIA And Ukrainian Operation

No comments:

Post a Comment