The U.S. Department of Clinton

Or, 

How Can the Democratic Party Run a Crook for President? 

Easily, as the Clinton Supporters commenting over at the WST make clear.

By Kimberly A. Strassell

Wall Street Journal, August 25, 2016: This is the week that the steady drip, drip, drip of details about Hillary Clinton’s server turned into a waterfall. This is the week that we finally learned why Mrs. Clinton used a private communications setup, and what it hid. This is the week, in short, that we found out that the infamous server was designed to hide that Mrs. Clinton for three years served as the U.S. Secretary of the Clinton Foundation.

In March this column argued that while Mrs. Clinton’s mishandling of classified information was important, it missed the bigger point. The Democratic nominee obviously didn’t set up her server with the express purpose of exposing national secrets—that was incidental. She set up the server to keep secret the details of the Clintons’ private life—a life built around an elaborate and sweeping money-raising and self-promoting entity known as the Clinton Foundation.

Had Secretary Clinton kept the foundation at arm’s length while in office—as obvious ethical standards would have dictated—there would never have been any need for a private server, or even private email. The vast majority of her electronic communications would have related to her job at the State Department, with maybe that occasional yoga schedule. And those Freedom of Information Act officers would have had little difficulty—when later going through a state.gov email—screening out the clearly “personal” before making her records public. This is how it works for everybody else.

An Unidentified FBI Analyst on the Incredible Corruption Surrounding the Clinton Foundation

Here is a 4chan discussion with  an "FBI analyst" in a photo-image … the comments by the ‘FBI analyst’ are highlighted in peach-orange colored boxes. Click the image to expand it.

The link is from a comment by Brabantian on today's Unz.com article on The Clinton Foundation by Michael Hudson.

Here's an easier to read transcript of the alleged "FBI Analyst"'s comments.

But is this alleged FBI analyst for real? Almost certainly not, unless he's an agent tasked with a disinformation role.

Even the NY Times Now Reporting How the Clinton's Cashed in on Sale of One Fifth of America's Uranium Reserve to a Russian State Corporation

In today's article, Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal, the New York Times quotes the Russian newspaper Pravda:

... the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company [Uranium One] with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West.

Which deal, the Times reports

... gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.

And "At the heart of the tale" reports the Times:

... are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family.

And, reports the Times:

Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

And the Times continues:

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

But the US establishment, i.e., the plutocracy who only like politicians they can buy, still prefer Hillary to one of their own, Donald Trump, with a reform agenda.

Related: 

Breitbart: Devastating Timeline Reveals the Transfer of Half of U.S. Uranium Output to Russia as Hillary Clinton’s Foundation Bags $145 Million