Related:
Steve Bannon: Hammer was the single most important, and the single most sophisticated system that came up after 9/11 for intelligence or counter-intelligence about radical Islamic jihad and the ability to monitor that... Lieutenant Thomas McInerny: "It was then adapted to the voting business. It was to be used, and it was used, in foreign countries. ... it was then moved over into the CIA and they started looking at US citizens. That is illegal. The CIA can not look at US citizens .. only the FBI with the proper FISA warrants, etc. This (vote hacking system) was taken out of CIA when the Obama Administration left, they used some Kabuki to get it out, they still have it up and running, we know where it is located... they are looking around, and they are trying to set up, this voting thing that happens on Tuesday night. It's going to look good for President Trump, but they're going to change, and that's the danger that America and everyone must realize. |
.
Colorado Professor Compares Questioning Voting Results To Holocaust Denial
Is there a special dumbness test that university professors have to pass now-a-days?
American Thinker: The Georgia recount may be as corrupt as the election itself
Dmitry Orlov: Watch This
Dmitry Orlov: Watch This
Pepe Escobar: First comes a rolling civil war
Graham Alison: Donald Trump's Stealthy Road to Victory
Google Search: Trump + Coup (LOL)
Lou Dobbs interview with Sidney Powell:
Giuliani: Presidential Election: Detroit a Cesspool of Corruption:
I'm listening to the Steve Turley YouTube presentation at top, but only partially agreeing.
ReplyDeleteI've been encouraged to see some rabid anti-Trump people acknowledge election fraud and questioning whether the country is well-served allowing a dirty cheater to sit the office of the POTUS. In other words, the liberals are not universally so stupid as ignore what's going on and deny its serious implications, nor are they so stupid as to see Trump's contestation of what's being done to him as their victimization.
I also didn't really appreciate the idea people who had a hard time accepting camo-wearing Federal Agents dispatched to Portland were no better than Antifa and through their caution betrayed Republican ideas.
I would say sending Federal Agents to various places in the US during the summer was a smart idea by Trump and probably bolstered his popularity throughout the country as the riots and property damage, on top of the planned-demic's ravages, were ruining their livelihoods. At the same time, it is the conservatives' long-standing political position the federalization of law enforcement is to be opposed. If it is necessary in some situations-- and we've seen one of them-- it isn't to be above scrutinization or the good old fashioned conservative practice of being vigilant of government intrusions.
Take this,
"Federal agents wearing camouflage without clear identification hit the streets in Portland to protect federal property amid demonstrations against police brutality. Some of the agents were accused of beating unarmed protesters, even throwing some into unmarked vehicles." ---
https://tinyurl.com/y2k42nne[Open in new window][Copy to clipboard]
These are the sorts of claims we rarely or never hear followup on. I am certainly concerned by their wearing camo and not having ID as well as beating people and especially throwing some into unmarked vehicles.
There is irony, which I do not appreciate, to these actions occurring against protests of police brutality.
Also, these were the largest emergency dispatches of Federal Agents, ever.
You may have a point. Certainly, if I am arrested for jaywalking or stopped for a breath test, I'd like to know on what authority I am being detained. However, when the Feds are faced by rioters whose Web address antifa.com links directly to the website of Joe Biden, creator of the largest vote fraud operation in history, maybe seeking to contain them while dressed as representatives of the Trump Administration is not a wise thing to do.
DeleteCurious. As my all-time record of hits approached one million, the gadget showing the total on my home disappeared. Now the entire right-hand side bar with links to older posts and other web sites has gone.
ReplyDeleteYou're right, CS, they have disappeared.
DeleteI notice, though, some of this reappears beneath the comments boxes. (See below) Has that always been there and I never noticed it before today?
"I notice, though, some of this reappears beneath the comments boxes." Weeirrrd! Time, perhaps, to move over to WordPress. Or maybe just follow the example of the old woman who said: "whenever I feel a worry coming on, I just close my eyes and doze a while." Even without my advice, the world will probably keep turning.
DeleteAnd now the side bar is back where it should be, and the total no. of page views displays on a Mac, but not on a PC!
Delete"... it was then moved over into the CIA and they started looking at US citizens. That is illegal. The CIA can not look at US citizens .. only the FBI with the proper FISA warrants, etc."
ReplyDeleteThis is precisely the sort of statement signalling to me there will be no pitched battle against the perpetrators of this fraud.
These kinds of people (fools?) continue to cite the rule of law as if it were a real thing, an effective thing.
What that means is they will think this rule of law is going to save the situation and they won't have to rely on their own blood and guts or trust their own mature intelligence when the chips are down.
What would have to happen now would be for the Trump supporters to audaciously attack and overturn what they've spent their lifetimes worshiping as "authority." Kowtowing to, blindly following, seeing no evil, hearing no evil--even no rape or murder-- when the "authorities" are doing it and telling them, "Hey, no problem! we are the good guys! It is the others who are victimizing and threatening us! We have to do this!"
In other words, this will be overturned if and only if the people who object to this level of fraudulence and tyranny have the courage of their convictions to such a degree they will kill and be killed.
Just as one example: they would need to clash with police. It will be a battle, a pitched one, and there will be killing and being killed. This, from the people who have spent the last six months or so fervently reaffirming the cops are justified, no matter what they do, and "civilians" need to stay out of it. Though it is a public affair what the cops do, and in a democracy, the duty of a civilian is to get into it, must get into it, if the civilian has a concern. (Let the public processes sort out whether or not that concern is legitimate.)
I for one knew what the CIA did overseas as early as 1970-1972, with the publication of the Pentagon Papers. (If I'd been really smart, I might have seen it earlier, along with Graham Greene, and The Quiet American, published in 1955. As well as being smarter, I would have had to been born then.)
I also always heard the warning: they are doing it over there but someday they'll be doing it here, too. And then in that very same decade: here it came-- news they were doing it here. Americans are so smart about this? How is it Allen Dulles, the CIA man fired by Kennedy, was on the Warren Commission, investigating the assassination of Kennedy? Amidst vague grumblings about Kennedy from the intelligence community concerning the handling of the Bay of Pigs invasion (and what was that?) and other matters where Kennedy did not seem to wish to be co-President or sub-President with these evil people.
As far as the FBI and FISA-- didn't these people pay attention to the way the FBI operates under this FISA crap? We just had Comey tell us he authorized wire taps and investigations which shouldn't have been authorized. He got away with chalking it up to "mistakes have been made."
We're seeing a lot of misdirection and distraction from the main event, CS. I'm going to put my ear to the ground and locate where the main event is happening. It isn't here.
"this will be overturned if and only if the people who object to this level of fraudulence and tyranny have the courage of their convictions to such a degree they will kill and be killed"
ReplyDeleteHave to say, I don't feel like going out and getting killed this morning. Maybe if the rain stops and weather brightens up a bit!
But realistically, who am I gonna fight? Here in the Soviet Socialist Republic of Trudeaustan, it's not obvious how I can strike a blow for freedom except, perhaps, by steadfastly not wearing a mask. Trouble is, when asked to do so, being a polite person, I put one on.
And I really don't see how shooting a Royal Canadian Mounted Police Officer, if I had a gun, which I don't, would help. My experience of RCMP officers is that they are pretty decent straight-laced guys who I would generally trust more than any politician. So I suppose I could shoot a politician, except I hardly ever see one.
I guess this is an unsatisfactory response to your challenge, in part perhaps, because I have this idea that physical force in the age of cyberwarfare may be irrelevant. Now if I were a genius programmer, instead of a dope who never had a computer until the age of 45, I might very well seek to engage the enemy.
I don't feel like getting myself killed either, especially in an act of futility.
DeleteYet that being said, how could this be effectively opposed? There must be some way.
Whatever way, there is going to be some level of regrettable ugliness, mess, and indecorum.
Otherwise, we're reduced to saying, politely and meekly, "Hey cheater people, murderer-torturer-pedophile-liar-thief people, please don't do that anymore! It is against the law! We don't like it when you do those things!
"If you keep doing this, we are going to go skulking around and for sure be much less compliant and willing to go along with your schemes...We might even hesitate to pay income taxes...If we still had incomes...Keep that in mind!"
There has to be a way, though. I have a theoretical commitment to the notion THERE IS AN ALERNATIVE!
Yes, flippancy aside, I think at this stage, individual action would be counterproductive. Any act of violence by a Trump supporter will be latched onto by the media as proof that Trumpsters are Fascist thugs, etc.
DeleteLeadership is needed and Trump is the apparent leader of the counter-revolution. His position, though, is tricky. As head of the armed forces he could, presumably, lock up Bill Gates, George Soros and a few hundred other key shysters for global governance (aka for World Communism with Billionaire Characteristics) but that would immediately convince the brainwashed masses that Trump was what the media has all along claimed, namely, a fascist dictator wannabe.
It would seem, therefore, that what Trump has to do is illuminate the massive and widespread fraud by the Chinese Communist-backed globalists for the Great Reset. Only then can he act. And until then, he remains open to virulent media assault and sabotage.
In that connection, is Trump's decision to end all the wars a sign of weakness or a clever propaganda move. Does it mean he's trying to make a difference before he's finally brought to the canvas, or is it designed to prove he's not fascist imperialist monster before turning on the enemy within?
"In that connection, is Trump's decision to end all the wars a sign of weakness or a clever propaganda move. Does it mean he's trying to make a difference before he's finally brought to the canvas, or is it designed to prove he's not fascist imperialist monster before turning on the enemy within?"
DeleteIt could be that genius level move of statesmanship which will combine smacking the ball out of the park politically and at the same time make the world a much, much better place. Whatever the case, I hope in these perhaps final days of Trump's administration his supporters will be incessantly and insistently pointing out to everyone at every possible opportunity he is doing this. There are going to be a lot of people (the people who mean well but got suckered) who are going to get squeamish seeing such a man removed from office under false pretenses. Squeamish to the extent they might for the first time look critically at Biden's voting record and the role he's played in these wars/messes messes/wars, and will play even more so as soon as he's been installed. This really might be the key CS. This might be the way to derail Biden and the fraud.
"I guess this is an unsatisfactory response to your challenge, in part perhaps, because I have this idea that physical force in the age of cyberwarfare may be irrelevant. Now if I were a genius programmer, instead of a dope who never had a computer until the age of 45, I might very well seek to engage the enemy."
ReplyDeleteWe could seek out such genius programmers and find ways to support their efforts. We could also help round out what they brought to the table, even if theirs was to be the major contribution.
I can see it now. Prior to the electoral college certification of the election results, a genius hacker goes in and hacks everything so that not only are the previously-tallied votes changed, but the manner of the changing is disguised, and in the manner of the previous hacking having been detected and deleted, as if the voting systems and software had self-corrected, as we are all familiar they are capable of this.
It just took the voting systems a little long to self correct, that's all. (Six weeks.) A little strange, maybe, but so what? What's wrong with that? It's all good!
I think that would make a great movie script. Is there anyone who could do that? According to General James McInerny, there probably is (at around 6 minutes and 45 seconds).
Delete