|Germans opposed to cultural genocide by mass immigration|
Germany has less than five million female citizens between the ages of 20 and 30, so by opening the door to one million young, middle-eastern, Islamic males, with millions more to come, the Merkel government has cuckolded the male youth of Germany.
Presumably the intention is to follow this with ever more energetic promotion of homosexuality as an outlet for the cucked, while welcoming Islam, a faith that sanctions the brutal execution of homosexuals, as a religion of peace and love eminently compatible with European civilization.
This is a policy of suicidal madness, driven by what appears to be the genocidal self-hatred of Frau Merkel, a leader whose family name might be Treason. At the height of the Cold War, her father, Horst Kasner, emigrated from West Germany to Communist East Germany, where he established a "sympathetic" relationship with the Communist regime, which rewarded him with various privileges including two cars. Meantime, the young Angela joined the Communist Youth. Later, at the East German Academy of Sciences, the future Chancellor of Germany became a member of the Free German Youth district board and secretary for "Agitprop" (Agitation and Propaganda). But then East Germany was re-united with West Germany wherupon Angela Merkel morphed easily into a democrat: the rest, as they say, being history.
And history brings us to yesterday's riots in Leipzig, the home of Angela Merkel's East German Communist youth, where hundreds rampaged through the town smashing ethnic restaurants. This, the Daily Mail, and no doubt the rest of the Presstitute media, attributes to "far right-wing elements." There's a problem with this part of the MSM narrative, however, as the New York Times revealed when quoting the "Influential Hamburg broadcaster NDR," which is that such crimes (the sexual assaults committed on News Year's Eve by Muslim "refugees" in Cologne and other German cities):
threaten to push xenophobia toward the "middle of the population" — which could lead to a backlash against refugees.Meaning that the furious reaction of Germans to state engineered invasion is not a manifestation of far right wingism, but is driven by the the natural and inevitable anger of the vast majority of German people and thus defeats the heretofor successful boiling frogs method of genocide by importing a new people. When virtually the entire population is aroused to anger, calling them far-right-wing extremists exposes the media hacks not only as liars but as stupid fools.
What's more, the New York Times, normally a leader of the cucks, seems to be losing its nerve about the promotion of European genocide by mass migration, for on January 9 an Op-Ed columnist wrote:
In the German case the important number here isn’t the country’s total population, currently 82 million. It’s the twentysomething population, which was less than 10 million in 2013 (and of course already included many immigrants). In that cohort and every cohort afterward, the current influx could have a transformative effect."Could have a transformative effect." LOL
How transformative depends on whether these men eventually find a way to bring brides and families to Europe as well.Which they won't. Much better, obviously, to marry a German girl or two, or three or four, who speaks the local lingo and can protect the cuckolds from the backlash of the native population.
But it could also double or treble this migration’s demographic impact, pushing Germany toward a possible future in which half the under-40 population would consist of Middle Eastern and North African immigrants and their children.Which is clearly the objective. Which is to say, the objective is European genocide.
But even the writer realizes that the worst outcome is inevitable, for he continues:
If you believe that an aging, secularized, heretofore-mostly-homogeneous society is likely to peacefully absorb a migration of that size and scale of cultural difference, then you have a bright future as a spokesman for the current German government.
You’re also a fool.And continues:
Such a transformation promises increasing polarization among natives and new arrivals alike. It threatens not just a spike in terrorism but a rebirth of 1930s-style political violence.What to do? Our panicky NY Timeser urges:
closing Germany’s borders to new arrivals for the time being. It means beginning an orderly deportation process for able-bodied young men.And he writes:
It means giving up the fond illusion that Germany’s past sins can be absolved with a reckless humanitarianism in the present.The last sentence giving the game away: the object of the game is the destruction of the people and culture of the Germans and the rest of the Europeans all in the name of avenging the Holocaust.
Deep Resource: “Easy Meat” the industrial-scale abuse of children in England by Muslims